Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Ilya Sutskever explains why AI will do 100% the work that human can do within few years. "Slowly but surely, or maybe not so slowly, AI will keep getting better. The day will come when AI will do all of our, all the things that we can do, not... just some of them, but all of them. Anything which I can learn, anything which any one of you can learn, the AI could do as well. How do we know this, by the way? How can I be so sure? How can I be so sure of that? The reason is that all of us have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer. That's why we have a brain; the brain is a biological computer. So why can't the digital computer, a digital brain, do the same things? This is the one-sentence summary for why AI will be able to do all those things: because we have a brain, and the brain is a biological computer." --- Full Video on 'University of Toronto' YT Channel (link in comment)show more

Rohan Paul

103,312 subscribers

334,691 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Ilya Sutskever, in his speech at UToronto 2 days ago: "The day will come when AI will do all the things we can do." "The reason is the brain is a biological computer, so why can't the digital computer do the same things?" It's funny that we are debating if AI can "truly think" or give "the illusion of thinking", as if our biological brain is superior or fundamentally different from a digital brain.

Ilya Sutskever, in his speech at UToronto 2 days ago: "The day will come when AI will do all the things we can do." "The reason is the brain is a biological computer, so why can't the digital computer do the same things?" It's funny that we are debating if AI can "truly think" or give "the illusion of thinking", as if our biological brain is superior or fundamentally different from a digital brain.

Yuchen Jin

3,094,305 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ilya Sutskever says the real challenge of AI is how fast and extreme its growth will be it still has limits, but it already speaks, codes, and interacts in ways once impossible soon, perhaps within 3 to 10 years, AI will be able to do everything humans can do the reason: "the human brain is a biological computer, so why can't a digital brain do the same?"

Ilya Sutskever says the real challenge of AI is how fast and extreme its growth will be it still has limits, but it already speaks, codes, and interacts in ways once impossible soon, perhaps within 3 to 10 years, AI will be able to do everything humans can do the reason: "the human brain is a biological computer, so why can't a digital brain do the same?"

Haider.

144,887 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Ilya Sutskever predicts that in the coming years—whether it’s three, five, or ten—AI will be able to do everything humans can do. He argues that since the brain is a biological computer, a digital computer should, in theory, be capable of learning and performing all the same tasks. This belief underpins his confidence in the arrival of truly general AI.

Wes Roth

14,017 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: WILL OUR LIVES STILL HAVE MEANING IF COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS OUTPERFORM US? “At some point, as AI and robotics get better, eventually AI will be able to do everything that humans can do. Any task you do will be optional, like a hobby. It does beg the question, will our lives have meaning if the computers and the robots can do everything better than we can? That is a real question. I do wonder about that myself. That's maybe why we need the Neuralink, so we can enhance human capability, so we can keep up with the machines.” Source: Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

ELON: WILL OUR LIVES STILL HAVE MEANING IF COMPUTERS AND ROBOTS OUTPERFORM US? “At some point, as AI and robotics get better, eventually AI will be able to do everything that humans can do. Any task you do will be optional, like a hobby. It does beg the question, will our lives have meaning if the computers and the robots can do everything better than we can? That is a real question. I do wonder about that myself. That's maybe why we need the Neuralink, so we can enhance human capability, so we can keep up with the machines.” Source: Interview with Mark Penn at CES, January 8, 2025

Mario Nawfal

329,978 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ilya Sutskever delivered the most intense AI wake-up call ever "We live in the most unusual time in history—because AI will soon do EVERYTHING humans can do. Why? Because your brain is a biological computer... so a digital one can match it. Jobs, skills, economy—everything changes when AI masters all human abilities. Then progress explodes at unimaginable speed. This is humanity's greatest challenge... and greatest reward." Even Ilya admits it's hard to emotionally grasp—yet the logic is inescapable. The future is coming fast—ignore it at your peril. 6:07 speech inside—must watch.

Ilya Sutskever delivered the most intense AI wake-up call ever "We live in the most unusual time in history—because AI will soon do EVERYTHING humans can do. Why? Because your brain is a biological computer... so a digital one can match it. Jobs, skills, economy—everything changes when AI masters all human abilities. Then progress explodes at unimaginable speed. This is humanity's greatest challenge... and greatest reward." Even Ilya admits it's hard to emotionally grasp—yet the logic is inescapable. The future is coming fast—ignore it at your peril. 6:07 speech inside—must watch.

Camus

188,550 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"I became very fascinated with the idea of the brain computer interface and what consequences that might bring to the world. And this is one of the reasons The Brain Show came up, so that people will have a chance to see some of the realization of these ideas, see how they feel about it, and where we should be leading things."

"I became very fascinated with the idea of the brain computer interface and what consequences that might bring to the world. And this is one of the reasons The Brain Show came up, so that people will have a chance to see some of the realization of these ideas, see how they feel about it, and where we should be leading things."

Peter Gabriel

24,897 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk on MACROHARD: "I'd be surprised if by end of this year, the digital human emulation has not been solved. That's what we mean by like, the sort of MACROHARD project is, can you do anything that a human with access to a computer could do? That's the best you can do before you have a physical Optimus, the best you can do is a digital Optimus."

Elon Musk on MACROHARD: "I'd be surprised if by end of this year, the digital human emulation has not been solved. That's what we mean by like, the sort of MACROHARD project is, can you do anything that a human with access to a computer could do? That's the best you can do before you have a physical Optimus, the best you can do is a digital Optimus."

DogeDesigner

91,178 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

How is the Web changing due to AI? This visit to TinyFish yesterday goes deeply into just how. TinyFish makes a new kind of web browser. One that is started virtually. It is like a Google Chrome in the cloud. But it is very smart, can read and use any website, and your AI agents can talk to it. Here we talk about what it all means for business and the future of robots, brain computer interfaces, and AI glasses. It lets you build systems that can look at MANY websites at the same time and build new kinds of apps to do all sorts of new things.

How is the Web changing due to AI? This visit to TinyFish yesterday goes deeply into just how. TinyFish makes a new kind of web browser. One that is started virtually. It is like a Google Chrome in the cloud. But it is very smart, can read and use any website, and your AI agents can talk to it. Here we talk about what it all means for business and the future of robots, brain computer interfaces, and AI glasses. It lets you build systems that can look at MANY websites at the same time and build new kinds of apps to do all sorts of new things.

Robert Scoble

16,341 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

X Freeze

16,839,405 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

32,810 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I don't have sales targets, revenue targets, user targets. Don't have any of these things. We just do the best work we can. A target shouldn't make me do better work. I should do better work because of the pride I take in the work that I do, and the seriousness in which I take the work that I do, and the enjoyment in the work that I do. I'm going to do the best I can. That's what I do. That's all I can do. That's all I should be doing, and I don't need something to try to tell me that I could do better had I aimed for some target. The target is the work I'm doing now. That's the best I can do."

"I don't have sales targets, revenue targets, user targets. Don't have any of these things. We just do the best work we can. A target shouldn't make me do better work. I should do better work because of the pride I take in the work that I do, and the seriousness in which I take the work that I do, and the enjoyment in the work that I do. I'm going to do the best I can. That's what I do. That's all I can do. That's all I should be doing, and I don't need something to try to tell me that I could do better had I aimed for some target. The target is the work I'm doing now. That's the best I can do."

David Senra

23,718 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”

Jack

61,457 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Geoffrey Hinton says AI models understand in the same way that people do and the best model we have of how the human brain works is large language models

Geoffrey Hinton says AI models understand in the same way that people do and the best model we have of how the human brain works is large language models

Tsarathustra

59,171 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

the blormmy brain is alive and growing you can now blorm in solana by swapping or sending tokens this is the beginning of how crypto and ai will change the way we do onchain actions more features coming soon

the blormmy brain is alive and growing you can now blorm in solana by swapping or sending tokens this is the beginning of how crypto and ai will change the way we do onchain actions more features coming soon

blormmy 🫟

60,213 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I argued in the Lords today that the assisted suicide Bill sends us down a dangerous road. We can't pick and choose which ethical principles we observe without depriving us of the most basic moral protections in future. "I urge us all to ask ourselves - are we really confident we are the generation that is so sure of its judgement, so wise, so knowledgeable, so confident we can create a good society on foundations not that we have inherited but which we ourselves have designed: are we so sure of all of those things that we can casually cast aside 2000 years of Judeo-Christian moral tradition and tell ourselves it doesn’t matter? Look around our country and ask yourselves this. I do not think so, and this is why I hope this Bill will founder."

I argued in the Lords today that the assisted suicide Bill sends us down a dangerous road. We can't pick and choose which ethical principles we observe without depriving us of the most basic moral protections in future. "I urge us all to ask ourselves - are we really confident we are the generation that is so sure of its judgement, so wise, so knowledgeable, so confident we can create a good society on foundations not that we have inherited but which we ourselves have designed: are we so sure of all of those things that we can casually cast aside 2000 years of Judeo-Christian moral tradition and tell ourselves it doesn’t matter? Look around our country and ask yourselves this. I do not think so, and this is why I hope this Bill will founder."

David Frost

142,979 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In just a few months, we've closed the gap from 21 points to 5 points in the polls. We can end political corruption. We can control AI so it works for humanity, not the oligarchs. We can have Medicare-for-all and lower the cost of living. But to do any of that, we have to change the leadership and direction of the Democratic Party, and our campaign is the only one willing to speak that truth. San Franciscans agree, and that's why we're surging. Sign up to volunteer at This is our chance.

In just a few months, we've closed the gap from 21 points to 5 points in the polls. We can end political corruption. We can control AI so it works for humanity, not the oligarchs. We can have Medicare-for-all and lower the cost of living. But to do any of that, we have to change the leadership and direction of the Democratic Party, and our campaign is the only one willing to speak that truth. San Franciscans agree, and that's why we're surging. Sign up to volunteer at This is our chance.

Saikat Chakrabarti for Congress

45,719 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Elon Musk says AI is improving at the rate of at least 10x per year and will be able to do anything a human can do in a year or two and be equal to the intelligence of all humans combined 3 years after that

Elon Musk says AI is improving at the rate of at least 10x per year and will be able to do anything a human can do in a year or two and be equal to the intelligence of all humans combined 3 years after that

Tsarathustra

160,593 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On net, is our biological hardware a help or hindrance to our intelligence? Are GPUs are to brains what fingers are to robot motors, and there’s a bunch of cognitive dexterity that our brain is uniquely good at implementing? Ala Morevac’s paradox, evolution has spent way more time optimizing nanotech than the semiconductor industry has. Or maybe it's something structural: the brain can do unstructured sparsity, and can colocate memory and compute. Or is it the other way around, because with digital computers, we can get rid of all these biological handicaps: The brain operates on a 20 W budget (and consequently runs at only 200 Hz speed in order to accommodate small voltage gaps). And it needs to do all this crazy intense molecular machinery in order to do things that take trivial amounts of code in computers: for example, update this parameter to this value. Net net, does current biological or digital computing hardware win out? I asked Adam Marblestone:

On net, is our biological hardware a help or hindrance to our intelligence? Are GPUs are to brains what fingers are to robot motors, and there’s a bunch of cognitive dexterity that our brain is uniquely good at implementing? Ala Morevac’s paradox, evolution has spent way more time optimizing nanotech than the semiconductor industry has. Or maybe it's something structural: the brain can do unstructured sparsity, and can colocate memory and compute. Or is it the other way around, because with digital computers, we can get rid of all these biological handicaps: The brain operates on a 20 W budget (and consequently runs at only 200 Hz speed in order to accommodate small voltage gaps). And it needs to do all this crazy intense molecular machinery in order to do things that take trivial amounts of code in computers: for example, update this parameter to this value. Net net, does current biological or digital computing hardware win out? I asked Adam Marblestone:

Dwarkesh Patel

26,451 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Who is doing your thinking and triggering your emotional responses? Consciousness or the body's biological computer software program? And who will be doing them when AI is connected to the human brain?

Who is doing your thinking and triggering your emotional responses? Consciousness or the body's biological computer software program? And who will be doing them when AI is connected to the human brain?

David Icke

69,230 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten