Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on... more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.show more

Amit Segal

83,543 subscribers

2,394,394 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

D3SL1 year ago

The only end of their program will be the end of their regime, especially now that major players like former Russian President Medvedev are openly saying there are offers to simply give Iran nuclear warheads ready to launch.

GazaGaslighter1 year ago

Amit, you’re dead right: the question now is how far back did Israel just push the clock on Iran’s bomb dreams — years, or all the way to zero?

Adammiller1 year ago

we need to explain this

3:RJbrandenburg1 year ago

BDA takes days. I would sit this one out for at least 72/96 hours.

Mitzi Rimon1 year ago

Another question is: If you were the mullahs, would you have some uranium set aside in another location(s) to be used in dirty bombs?

(((bookworm)))1 year ago

With the damage done by the US strikes, does that allow Israeli munitions to be used in follow ups?

MasterFeeds1 year ago

I’m no expert, but just wondering why there wasn’t a second run through the targets after B2 strikes—either by 🇺🇸or 🇮🇱?

Gamulán Pollero 🇮🇱 🎗 📟1 year ago

It would make no sense to move the uranium from Fordow to a less protected place like Isfahan. Also, if the uranium is in gas form, it would be in large containers. Impossible to disguise. It would have been tracked if it went outside of Fordow.

Jack Dorksey1 year ago

So the source lied to NYT, but told you the the truth? OhhhhhhKay

Related Videos

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Clash Report

53,986 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SCOTT RITTER: U.S. ADMITS IT DOESN'T KNOW WHERE IRAN'S URANIUM IS "They've blown up some empty facilities. All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden sites that we don't know where it is. The U.S. government has admitted... We don't know where Iran's enriched uranium is. All of the centrifuges that Iran needs to step that up to nuclear weapons grade are secure in facilities... Isfahan facility that was bombed and safeguarded, all of the sensitive production equipment is safeguarded. It didn't get touched."

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SCOTT RITTER: U.S. ADMITS IT DOESN'T KNOW WHERE IRAN'S URANIUM IS "They've blown up some empty facilities. All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden sites that we don't know where it is. The U.S. government has admitted... We don't know where Iran's enriched uranium is. All of the centrifuges that Iran needs to step that up to nuclear weapons grade are secure in facilities... Isfahan facility that was bombed and safeguarded, all of the sensitive production equipment is safeguarded. It didn't get touched."

Mario Nawfal

124,987 views • 1 year ago

Q: "Do you know for sure where all the highly enriched uranium is?" Vance: "Well, I think that's actually not the question before us...Uranium is something that exists in a very large supply. I think our main goal was to bury the uranium and I do think the uranium was buried."

Q: "Do you know for sure where all the highly enriched uranium is?" Vance: "Well, I think that's actually not the question before us...Uranium is something that exists in a very large supply. I think our main goal was to bury the uranium and I do think the uranium was buried."

The Bulwark

3,148,352 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

Bill Mitchell

82,791 views • 1 month ago

It was foggy yesterday. There were also contradictory statements by J.D. Vance and other officials. I think that now we can connect all the dots. Nir Dvori described the land subsidence in Fordo. We’ve already talked about the attacks on the access roads to Fordo, so that no one would come close. The incident is reminiscent of those assassinations of Hassan Nasrallah and Muhammad Sinwar, in which you actually fence off the victim and don't let anyone get close so that, in this case, he will die of suffocation. Or in the case of uranium — so no one will be able to access it . So it can be said with a high probability that most, if not all, of the enriched uranium in Iran's possession is currently buried dozens of meters underground, whether at Fordo or, a little less depth than that, at Natanz. Now the question is, who will get there first? It won't be the Iranians. And there's another very interesting thing. The one who is actually responsible for this, for preventing uranium from reaching the Iranians again, is the United States. There are many ways to prevent someone from getting there. There are intelligence methods, there are commando methods, there are bombing methods. Many ways. There are also many ways to force an agreement on the Iranians. Saying, "Do you want a ceasefire? Please, come down, we're watching you from the satellite, and bring the uranium." All of this, assuming it's possible. But the enriched uranium, the holy grail of this operation, is currently buried dozens of meters underground, after the Israeli and mainly American bombings.

It was foggy yesterday. There were also contradictory statements by J.D. Vance and other officials. I think that now we can connect all the dots. Nir Dvori described the land subsidence in Fordo. We’ve already talked about the attacks on the access roads to Fordo, so that no one would come close. The incident is reminiscent of those assassinations of Hassan Nasrallah and Muhammad Sinwar, in which you actually fence off the victim and don't let anyone get close so that, in this case, he will die of suffocation. Or in the case of uranium — so no one will be able to access it . So it can be said with a high probability that most, if not all, of the enriched uranium in Iran's possession is currently buried dozens of meters underground, whether at Fordo or, a little less depth than that, at Natanz. Now the question is, who will get there first? It won't be the Iranians. And there's another very interesting thing. The one who is actually responsible for this, for preventing uranium from reaching the Iranians again, is the United States. There are many ways to prevent someone from getting there. There are intelligence methods, there are commando methods, there are bombing methods. Many ways. There are also many ways to force an agreement on the Iranians. Saying, "Do you want a ceasefire? Please, come down, we're watching you from the satellite, and bring the uranium." All of this, assuming it's possible. But the enriched uranium, the holy grail of this operation, is currently buried dozens of meters underground, after the Israeli and mainly American bombings.

Amit Segal

35,044 views • 1 year ago

The Islamic regime in Iran cannot be allowed to keep its enriched uranium. For decades they’ve been trying to build a nuclear bomb. They currently have 60 percent enriched uranium. From that level, they can get to 90 percent which is weapons-grade in a week or so. That’s why America and Israel had to act when they did. So the real question is: what happens to that uranium? There are only two real options. Either Iran gives it up peacefully, or someone has to go in and take it by force, because this is not something that can just sit there for the Islamic regime to keep.

The Islamic regime in Iran cannot be allowed to keep its enriched uranium. For decades they’ve been trying to build a nuclear bomb. They currently have 60 percent enriched uranium. From that level, they can get to 90 percent which is weapons-grade in a week or so. That’s why America and Israel had to act when they did. So the real question is: what happens to that uranium? There are only two real options. Either Iran gives it up peacefully, or someone has to go in and take it by force, because this is not something that can just sit there for the Islamic regime to keep.

Noa Tishby

19,300 views • 4 months ago

IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi on Iran's uranium stockpile: "Even if you move part of it, you could still have amounts… enough for a few warheads. The vast majority is in Isfahan. There is also some in Natanz. More than 70%?, perhaps a little bit less. They have a very big stockpile of highly enriched uranium… very close to military-grade."

IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi on Iran's uranium stockpile: "Even if you move part of it, you could still have amounts… enough for a few warheads. The vast majority is in Isfahan. There is also some in Natanz. More than 70%?, perhaps a little bit less. They have a very big stockpile of highly enriched uranium… very close to military-grade."

Open Source Intel

139,141 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇷 🇮🇱 DEBATE CLUB: MISSING URANIUM, DESTROYED FACILITIES & THE PATH FORWARD Jonathan Conricus: “We don’t yet know where the enriched uranium is—neither does the IAEA. But even if Iran stashed it away, they still need the conversion facilities at Isfahan and Natanz…both obliterated. If you can’t convert it, you can’t weaponize it.” Scott Ritter: “Obliterated? What does that mean? The halls at Fordow may be intact. Iran has been planning for this since 2005. They know how to hide centrifuges, materials, even uranium hexafluoride. And now we’ve created a verification nightmare. Even if Iran wanted to cooperate, the destruction of evidence makes it impossible to verify anything.”

🇮🇷 🇮🇱 DEBATE CLUB: MISSING URANIUM, DESTROYED FACILITIES & THE PATH FORWARD Jonathan Conricus: “We don’t yet know where the enriched uranium is—neither does the IAEA. But even if Iran stashed it away, they still need the conversion facilities at Isfahan and Natanz…both obliterated. If you can’t convert it, you can’t weaponize it.” Scott Ritter: “Obliterated? What does that mean? The halls at Fordow may be intact. Iran has been planning for this since 2005. They know how to hide centrifuges, materials, even uranium hexafluoride. And now we’ve created a verification nightmare. Even if Iran wanted to cooperate, the destruction of evidence makes it impossible to verify anything.”

Mario Nawfal

114,575 views • 1 year ago

Retired US Army General Jack Keane once again confirms that the Americans' goal is not the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program, but the theft of valuable resources. 'China is effectively Iran's main source of funding, buying 80-90% of their oil. Russia also supports them. And you know what? We can't trust Iran, and we can't trust Russia. So, no, we're not going to hand over enriched uranium to Russia. We'll take it from Iran ourselves and ensure it's completely eliminated, that Iran doesn't own it, and we won't allow them to enrich it.'

Retired US Army General Jack Keane once again confirms that the Americans' goal is not the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program, but the theft of valuable resources. 'China is effectively Iran's main source of funding, buying 80-90% of their oil. Russia also supports them. And you know what? We can't trust Iran, and we can't trust Russia. So, no, we're not going to hand over enriched uranium to Russia. We'll take it from Iran ourselves and ensure it's completely eliminated, that Iran doesn't own it, and we won't allow them to enrich it.'

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,736 views • 4 months ago

IAEA director general Rafael Grossi 🗣️ "There is a large amount of highly enriched uranium at 60% of enrichment. To make a bomb, you need 90%." ＠MattBarbet 🗣️ "Which is what (Iran) wants?" Rafael Grossi "We don't judge intentions." ＠MattBarbet 🗣️ "Well, 60% uranium is not for creating energy." Could Kazakhstan support the transfer or management of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile? Watch 🔽 🌍 #Irannegotiations #peacetalks #nuclear

IAEA director general Rafael Grossi 🗣️ "There is a large amount of highly enriched uranium at 60% of enrichment. To make a bomb, you need 90%." ＠MattBarbet 🗣️ "Which is what (Iran) wants?" Rafael Grossi "We don't judge intentions." ＠MattBarbet 🗣️ "Well, 60% uranium is not for creating energy." Could Kazakhstan support the transfer or management of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile? Watch 🔽 🌍 #Irannegotiations #peacetalks #nuclear

Sky News

48,330 views • 2 months ago

Everything is moving at once: U.S.–Israel coordination, a louder EU, and now IAEA chief Rafael Grossi warning that Iran has buried highly enriched uranium and inspectors still lack access to key sites like Natanz and Fordow. After months of silence on the nuclear file, the narrative is back. Not because the threat is new, but because pressure is building.

Everything is moving at once: U.S.–Israel coordination, a louder EU, and now IAEA chief Rafael Grossi warning that Iran has buried highly enriched uranium and inspectors still lack access to key sites like Natanz and Fordow. After months of silence on the nuclear file, the narrative is back. Not because the threat is new, but because pressure is building.

Tousi TV

28,447 views • 6 months ago

"Iran told Steve Witkoff at the start of negotiations: we have 460 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, and we're ready to give it up, verified by American inspectors." Scott Ritter on our stream: Iran's enriched uranium is accounted for, not hidden in blown-out bunkers. Former FM Zarif just published a piece in Foreign Affairs offering the same deal, and you don't publish that without a green light from Tehran. "All the people saying Iran already built the nukes — you don't know what you're talking about."

"Iran told Steve Witkoff at the start of negotiations: we have 460 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, and we're ready to give it up, verified by American inspectors." Scott Ritter on our stream: Iran's enriched uranium is accounted for, not hidden in blown-out bunkers. Former FM Zarif just published a piece in Foreign Affairs offering the same deal, and you don't publish that without a green light from Tehran. "All the people saying Iran already built the nukes — you don't know what you're talking about."

DD Geopolitics

69,590 views • 4 months ago

"Let's talk about the Epstein stuff. I thought it got real interesting when Elon put out that tweet. And then all of a sudden, a few weeks later, what I thought was really interesting to watch Trump take over Pam Bondi....When are we going to see the list? I mean, he wrote that, you know, in the campaign and then this potentially destroying his entire base by just dismissing it and closing the case." "Not one of our 18 intelligence agencies said that there was enriched uranium there. Now, I'm not a friend of Iran. I know Iran uses terrorist groups as proxies, but I thought it was interesting that not one of our 18 intelligence agencies said that Iran had enriched uranium at those facilities." Gavin Newsom

"Let's talk about the Epstein stuff. I thought it got real interesting when Elon put out that tweet. And then all of a sudden, a few weeks later, what I thought was really interesting to watch Trump take over Pam Bondi....When are we going to see the list? I mean, he wrote that, you know, in the campaign and then this potentially destroying his entire base by just dismissing it and closing the case." "Not one of our 18 intelligence agencies said that there was enriched uranium there. Now, I'm not a friend of Iran. I know Iran uses terrorist groups as proxies, but I thought it was interesting that not one of our 18 intelligence agencies said that Iran had enriched uranium at those facilities." Gavin Newsom

Shawn Ryan

177,929 views • 1 year ago

Told ا لـحـدث that uranium is not something that can be thrown in the back of the car and moved around, that it's likely that Islamist #Iran regime stored its stock in Fordo believing it's the most fortified, that the US bombs collapsed the facility inside the mountain at which depth might make radiation less likely to be detected. Also said everyone who was saying Iran was a year away from a bomb now saying strike put it at weeks and vice versa, those who said Iran was at weeks now say it was set back years. Most of the debate is politics, not accurate depiction of outcome.

Told ا لـحـدث that uranium is not something that can be thrown in the back of the car and moved around, that it's likely that Islamist #Iran regime stored its stock in Fordo believing it's the most fortified, that the US bombs collapsed the facility inside the mountain at which depth might make radiation less likely to be detected. Also said everyone who was saying Iran was a year away from a bomb now saying strike put it at weeks and vice versa, those who said Iran was at weeks now say it was set back years. Most of the debate is politics, not accurate depiction of outcome.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

16,295 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 RUBIO TO IRAN: TURN OVER THE ENRICHED URANIUM "What they should do is say, we're not gonna have any enrichment capability in our country. Instead, what we're gonna have is a civil nuclear program like dozens of countries around the world have, where we build reactors that create electricity, and we import enriched material. And we've made very general, I'm not gonna get all the details of the offers, but there are other avenues here that would be acceptable to them. If that's what they wanted, if what they want is a civil, peaceful nuclear program, the route has always been there. The problem is that everything they're demanding has nothing to do with a peaceful program. They are all the things you would want if you want to retain the option of one day weaponizing the program." Source: CBS News

🇺🇸🇮🇷 RUBIO TO IRAN: TURN OVER THE ENRICHED URANIUM "What they should do is say, we're not gonna have any enrichment capability in our country. Instead, what we're gonna have is a civil nuclear program like dozens of countries around the world have, where we build reactors that create electricity, and we import enriched material. And we've made very general, I'm not gonna get all the details of the offers, but there are other avenues here that would be acceptable to them. If that's what they wanted, if what they want is a civil, peaceful nuclear program, the route has always been there. The problem is that everything they're demanding has nothing to do with a peaceful program. They are all the things you would want if you want to retain the option of one day weaponizing the program." Source: CBS News

Mario Nawfal

245,668 views • 1 year ago

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the country’s enriched nuclear material is now “under the rubbles” and claims there are no plans to recover it. He also stated that Iran’s previous offer to dilute enriched uranium — once described as a major concession — is no longer on the table for now. Everything, he says, depends on what happens in the future. 🌍🕊️

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the country’s enriched nuclear material is now “under the rubbles” and claims there are no plans to recover it. He also stated that Iran’s previous offer to dilute enriched uranium — once described as a major concession — is no longer on the table for now. Everything, he says, depends on what happens in the future. 🌍🕊️

THE BOLD VOICE

56,080 views • 5 months ago

🚨 DONALD TRUMP HAS JUST BEEN VINDICATED ON THE WORLD STAGE Energy Sec. Chris Wright just confirmed it: Iran was WEEKS AWAY from weapons-grade uranium, already has 60% enriched! "They have some 20% enriched uranium, and that's several more weeks behind 60%...when you're at 60%, you are, although the numbers don't sound that way, you're WAY more than 90% of the way there for the enrichment necessary for weapons-grade uranium!" "Very close. 20% uranium, which they also have a lot of, is far along as well." Trump did the right thing. They were about to unleash havoc.

🚨 DONALD TRUMP HAS JUST BEEN VINDICATED ON THE WORLD STAGE Energy Sec. Chris Wright just confirmed it: Iran was WEEKS AWAY from weapons-grade uranium, already has 60% enriched! "They have some 20% enriched uranium, and that's several more weeks behind 60%...when you're at 60%, you are, although the numbers don't sound that way, you're WAY more than 90% of the way there for the enrichment necessary for weapons-grade uranium!" "Very close. 20% uranium, which they also have a lot of, is far along as well." Trump did the right thing. They were about to unleash havoc.

Eric Daugherty

328,491 views • 3 months ago

🚨 DONALD TRUMP HAS JUST BEEN VINDICATED ON THE WORLD STAGE Energy Sec. Chris Wright just confirmed it: Iran was WEEKS AWAY from weapons-grade uranium, already has 60% enriched! "They have some 20% enriched uranium, and that's several more weeks behind 60%...when you're at 60%, you are, although the numbers don't sound that way, you're WAY more than 90% of the way there for the enrichment necessary for weapons-grade uranium!" "Very close. 20% uranium, which they also have a lot of, is far along as well." Trump did the right thing. They were about to unleash havoc.

🚨 DONALD TRUMP HAS JUST BEEN VINDICATED ON THE WORLD STAGE Energy Sec. Chris Wright just confirmed it: Iran was WEEKS AWAY from weapons-grade uranium, already has 60% enriched! "They have some 20% enriched uranium, and that's several more weeks behind 60%...when you're at 60%, you are, although the numbers don't sound that way, you're WAY more than 90% of the way there for the enrichment necessary for weapons-grade uranium!" "Very close. 20% uranium, which they also have a lot of, is far along as well." Trump did the right thing. They were about to unleash havoc.

War Correspondent

147,433 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Multiple Israeli officials are saying they “would NOT” consider the war a victory until Iran’s 400 kilos of enriched uranium is “controlled in some way.” “That does not appear to be the President’s goal here.” Trump said earlier today that Iran is now “incapable” of making a nuclear weapon, and that the US would monitor their enriched uranium from satellites and take action if Iran makes a move. “That has not been Israel’s goal at the start of this war,” reported Jim Sciutto. “I’ve been told by multiple Israeli officials that they would not consider the war a victory unless that 400 kilos of enriched uranium was controlled in some way.”

🚨 Multiple Israeli officials are saying they “would NOT” consider the war a victory until Iran’s 400 kilos of enriched uranium is “controlled in some way.” “That does not appear to be the President’s goal here.” Trump said earlier today that Iran is now “incapable” of making a nuclear weapon, and that the US would monitor their enriched uranium from satellites and take action if Iran makes a move. “That has not been Israel’s goal at the start of this war,” reported Jim Sciutto. “I’ve been told by multiple Israeli officials that they would not consider the war a victory unless that 400 kilos of enriched uranium was controlled in some way.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

148,281 views • 4 months ago