Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
I’m more interested in AI courses that react to what I do than lectures I can play at 2x. Gauth generates 3D simulations and adapts lessons in real time. That changes the student’s role: you get to experiment, not just press play.
14,024,977 просмотров • 6 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 23

Syncing board notes, voice narration, and quick checks on one freeform surface reduces the overload of jumping between slides and chat windows. A canvas playback slider would be great too—teachers could scrub through a student’s work and see exactly where a misconception started.

The solids of revolution demo caught my attention. I’d want to rotate the shape myself to understand where the volume comes from

This is the shift that matters: AI isn’t just changing how courses are delivered, it’s changing what a course can actually be.

The future course may not be a collection of videos at all. It could be a dynamic environment that teaches, tests, and adapts.

3D simulations + real-time adaptation could completely change how difficult concepts are taught.

the gap between watching a concept and breaking it yourself is the whole learning curve honestly

Traditional courses deliver the same path to everyone. AI-native courses can dynamically respond to how someone is actually learning.

The web digitized classrooms. AI has the potential to make classrooms responsive.

The simulation layer is particularly interesting. Some concepts are dramatically easier to understand when you can manipulate them yourself.

Technology keeps getting more interesting.

Passive consumption to active simulation” is the key idea here. That’s a meaningful change in the learning loop.

This feels much closer to learning by doing than conventional online education.

AI-native education feels less like attending a lecture and more like interacting with a responsive learning environment.

Static video teaches you what someone knows. Interactive simulation lets you actually explore how something works. Huge difference.

Education could be moving from content consumption → concept exploration.

We’ve spent years putting classrooms online. Now AI gives us a chance to rethink what an online classroom actually is.

This is a much more compelling use of AI than simply putting a chatbot beside a video library.

This is the kind of AI-native education I’d actually want to experiment with:

If the course can react to what you do, ask questions, and adapt the experience, the course itself becomes part of the teacher.

Such a powerful example.

This is actually fascinating.

I love that the quick checks push active mastery instead of passive scrolling. When element-level Q&A arrives, could parents get a simple summary showing how many follow-up questions their child needed to master a difficult concept?

The Sokoban A* visualization made pathfinding deadlocks click way faster than my professor’s 50-slide deck. Having the AI tutor show alternative search paths right under the diagram when I asked a question was especially cool. It’d be even better if we could compare two canvas solutions side-by-side to see exactly where our logic diverged.

