Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🧠 "I'm not here to change your mind." That's the first thing Professor Dan Ariely tells antisemites. On the latest episode of ALL CAPS, the renowned behavioral scientist explains the surprising approach he uses when speaking with people who hold deeply anti-Israel or antisemitic beliefs—and why trying to win... show more

Shurat HaDin - שורת הדין

24,342 subscribers

17,514 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Did he just reveal the entire plot? From sacrificing their own citizens to blaming Israel for the very tactics they carry out, the pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. The panel reacts to a contentious Piers Morgan interview with a Hamas representative who denied intentionally committing crimes against civilians on October 7. The discussion focuses particularly on his argument that the attack helped isolate Israel internationally and return the Palestinian issue to the center of global attention. Watch the full episode of ALL CAPS featuring Nitsana Darshan-Leitner (Nitsana Darshan-Leitner ניצנה דרשן-לייטנר) Sarai Givaty (Sarai Givaty), Yityish Titi Ayanaw (Titi ayanaw. טיטי איינאו) and India Naftali (India Naftali) #PiersMorgan #Hasbara #TruthExposed #MiddleEast #CurrentEvents #Perspective #MediaAnalysis #ynetGlobal

Did he just reveal the entire plot? From sacrificing their own citizens to blaming Israel for the very tactics they carry out, the pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. The panel reacts to a contentious Piers Morgan interview with a Hamas representative who denied intentionally committing crimes against civilians on October 7. The discussion focuses particularly on his argument that the attack helped isolate Israel internationally and return the Palestinian issue to the center of global attention. Watch the full episode of ALL CAPS featuring Nitsana Darshan-Leitner (Nitsana Darshan-Leitner ניצנה דרשן-לייטנר) Sarai Givaty (Sarai Givaty), Yityish Titi Ayanaw (Titi ayanaw. טיטי איינאו) and India Naftali (India Naftali) #PiersMorgan #Hasbara #TruthExposed #MiddleEast #CurrentEvents #Perspective #MediaAnalysis #ynetGlobal

Ynet Global

43,295 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Susanna Reid: from the river to the sea is an erasure of Israel, death to IDF is death to Israelis Kevin Maguire: in Israel some want Palestinians out from the river to the sea Kwasi Kwarteng: that doesn't make it right Kevin Maguire: the terrible things happening in Gaza, and the IDF is doing them, more than 400 people killed queing for food Susanna Reid: criticism of those things is understandable Kevin Maguire: criticising Israel is not automatically anti-semitic when you look at what Israel has done. If a community in Britain is feeling under attack, we have to respect that Kwasi Kwarteng: it's not about Israel's policy, they're trying to wipe out Israel, river to the sea, that's why Rob Rinder and others are frightened about that chant Susanna Reid: when you say it's not anti semetic to criticise Israel, what the Jewish community say is things that are aggressive or violent against Israel are tolerated in a way which if said about other groups would not be tolerated is an example of anti semetism Kevin Maguire: we've got to be careful not to conflate Jewish and Israel. You hear people say destroy hamas, eradicate, eliminate hamas, we all know what that means. Is that anti Muslim? No Kwasi Kwarteng: you can criticse Israel, you can criticise their policies, but you can confirm and support its right to exist. River to the sea means you just wipe our the state of Israel, that is what people find offensive Kevin Maguire: the people who use that phase, some do not want to erradicate Israel, and do not want to eradicate Jewish people. What they're saying is Palestinians live between the river and the sea, including Arab citizens of Israel Kwasi Kwarteng: no no no no no, you're putting a very pleasant interpretation, Israel is between the river to the sea, that means get rid of Israel Kevin Maguire: not everybody who uses that phrase means that

Susanna Reid: from the river to the sea is an erasure of Israel, death to IDF is death to Israelis Kevin Maguire: in Israel some want Palestinians out from the river to the sea Kwasi Kwarteng: that doesn't make it right Kevin Maguire: the terrible things happening in Gaza, and the IDF is doing them, more than 400 people killed queing for food Susanna Reid: criticism of those things is understandable Kevin Maguire: criticising Israel is not automatically anti-semitic when you look at what Israel has done. If a community in Britain is feeling under attack, we have to respect that Kwasi Kwarteng: it's not about Israel's policy, they're trying to wipe out Israel, river to the sea, that's why Rob Rinder and others are frightened about that chant Susanna Reid: when you say it's not anti semetic to criticise Israel, what the Jewish community say is things that are aggressive or violent against Israel are tolerated in a way which if said about other groups would not be tolerated is an example of anti semetism Kevin Maguire: we've got to be careful not to conflate Jewish and Israel. You hear people say destroy hamas, eradicate, eliminate hamas, we all know what that means. Is that anti Muslim? No Kwasi Kwarteng: you can criticse Israel, you can criticise their policies, but you can confirm and support its right to exist. River to the sea means you just wipe our the state of Israel, that is what people find offensive Kevin Maguire: the people who use that phase, some do not want to erradicate Israel, and do not want to eradicate Jewish people. What they're saying is Palestinians live between the river and the sea, including Arab citizens of Israel Kwasi Kwarteng: no no no no no, you're putting a very pleasant interpretation, Israel is between the river to the sea, that means get rid of Israel Kevin Maguire: not everybody who uses that phrase means that

Farrukh

1,353,426 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Why Are You Upset At Itamar Ben Gvir and His Treatment of Flotilla Activists?” Question: What do you think is the goal of the flotilla activists? If you think it’s to bring aid to Gazans, do I have a bridge for you! No! Obviously their goal is the destruction of Israel. Just like every terrorist who aims to destroy Israel through murder and mayhem, the activists are trying to accomplish the same through a different sort of mayhem. And you’re upset why? Because Ben Gvir is humiliating them? Mocking them? Treating them poorly? Would you say the same if they were outright shooting and murdering Israelis? Or is it somehow more acceptable to you that they weapons are propaganda, heads of state who wish for the similar destruction of Israel, and a willing media who likewise wish to see the annihilation of Israel and every Jew therein? Ben Gvir—for his many faults—does one thing better than any other Israeli politician: He doesn’t give a flying fuck about what others think of him and Israel. What? You think if Israel treats this annihilationist propagandists with kiddie gloves that all of a sudden the rhetoric and perception about Israel will change? Grow up and check the status quo. Israel doesn’t lose its humanity when it acts like Ben Gvir; it loses its humanity when it bends over backwards and sacrifices its own humans for a world that will hate it no matter what. This isn’t a chicken and egg issue. This is a “they hate Israel so will use anything to hate Israel” issue. Disagree? Don’t care. I’ll state it plainly: It doesn’t matter what Israel does, the majority of the world will hate Israel. Stop trying to placate the haters, and start making hating Israel painful. Treat them like the terrorists they are. They’re using violence—the breaking of legal blockades—to try and destroy Israel. Treat them with the respect they deserve, which is to say none. You might Ben Gvir and his actions, but I hate people who wish for the annihilation of my country and people even more. America and Americans shouldn’t have to deal with it, why should Israel?

“Why Are You Upset At Itamar Ben Gvir and His Treatment of Flotilla Activists?” Question: What do you think is the goal of the flotilla activists? If you think it’s to bring aid to Gazans, do I have a bridge for you! No! Obviously their goal is the destruction of Israel. Just like every terrorist who aims to destroy Israel through murder and mayhem, the activists are trying to accomplish the same through a different sort of mayhem. And you’re upset why? Because Ben Gvir is humiliating them? Mocking them? Treating them poorly? Would you say the same if they were outright shooting and murdering Israelis? Or is it somehow more acceptable to you that they weapons are propaganda, heads of state who wish for the similar destruction of Israel, and a willing media who likewise wish to see the annihilation of Israel and every Jew therein? Ben Gvir—for his many faults—does one thing better than any other Israeli politician: He doesn’t give a flying fuck about what others think of him and Israel. What? You think if Israel treats this annihilationist propagandists with kiddie gloves that all of a sudden the rhetoric and perception about Israel will change? Grow up and check the status quo. Israel doesn’t lose its humanity when it acts like Ben Gvir; it loses its humanity when it bends over backwards and sacrifices its own humans for a world that will hate it no matter what. This isn’t a chicken and egg issue. This is a “they hate Israel so will use anything to hate Israel” issue. Disagree? Don’t care. I’ll state it plainly: It doesn’t matter what Israel does, the majority of the world will hate Israel. Stop trying to placate the haters, and start making hating Israel painful. Treat them like the terrorists they are. They’re using violence—the breaking of legal blockades—to try and destroy Israel. Treat them with the respect they deserve, which is to say none. You might Ben Gvir and his actions, but I hate people who wish for the annihilation of my country and people even more. America and Americans shouldn’t have to deal with it, why should Israel?

Jake Donnelly

10,562 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨WAR ON IRAN: After Gaza, Israel returned to its ‘muscle memory of fighting against ALL of the Arabs’-Mohammed Baharoon🇦🇪 ‘Saudi Arabia was very close to a deal, or an understanding, with Israel. What made it fall apart was not only Israel’s attack on Gaza, but also the fact that Israel does not want to acknowledge or accept any future for the Palestinians as a state. We in the UAE, through the Abraham Accords, were trying to create a reality where this is not a threat to the Israelis. The Israelis maintained this for a long time, that a Palestinian state is a threat to Israel. And our view was that, in an integrated situation where all of the countries don’t fight each other over religion, and we are capable of being part of a wider network, then that will change the dynamics. Unfortunately it didn’t. We were close to that. The Gaza attack sort of dismantled this and brought Israel back to their muscle memory of fighting against all of the Arabs. And I think that’s where we’re seeing this new approach of Greater Israel.’ -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of Going Underground, as the UAE🇦🇪 deals with the regional crisis unleashed by the war on Iran. Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇 b'huth بحوث

🚨WAR ON IRAN: After Gaza, Israel returned to its ‘muscle memory of fighting against ALL of the Arabs’-Mohammed Baharoon🇦🇪 ‘Saudi Arabia was very close to a deal, or an understanding, with Israel. What made it fall apart was not only Israel’s attack on Gaza, but also the fact that Israel does not want to acknowledge or accept any future for the Palestinians as a state. We in the UAE, through the Abraham Accords, were trying to create a reality where this is not a threat to the Israelis. The Israelis maintained this for a long time, that a Palestinian state is a threat to Israel. And our view was that, in an integrated situation where all of the countries don’t fight each other over religion, and we are capable of being part of a wider network, then that will change the dynamics. Unfortunately it didn’t. We were close to that. The Gaza attack sort of dismantled this and brought Israel back to their muscle memory of fighting against all of the Arabs. And I think that’s where we’re seeing this new approach of Greater Israel.’ -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of Going Underground, as the UAE🇦🇪 deals with the regional crisis unleashed by the war on Iran. Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇 b'huth بحوث

Going Underground

55,173 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🗺️ TOUR TUESDAY: TOURING ISRAEL CAN ALSO MEAN VOLUNTEERING (Part of our scheduled daily content lineup — always pinned.) This week, My friend Oren from TravelingIsrael dot com heads into the hills of Samaria to visit The Israel Guys at their new center in Har Bracha. Most people think of touring Israel as visiting Jerusalem, Masada or the Sea of Galilee. But there is another way to experience the country: Come volunteer. Work the land. Meet the people. Become part of the story. Oren sits down with Joshua Waller, CEO of The Israel Guys, whose family came from Tennessee and has spent more than two decades bringing Christian volunteers to Israel. Their volunteers have helped develop roughly 120 farms across Judea and Samaria, with more than 5,000 long-term volunteers coming from dozens of countries. Joshua explains why they believe Christians should come to Israel not to change the Jewish people, but to serve them, strengthen them and help rebuild the land of Israel. He also addresses the claim that Christians are unwelcome or unsafe in Israel — speaking from more than 20 years of his own experience living among religious Jews in Har Bracha. For anyone planning a trip to Israel, this is worth considering: Don’t just come to see Israel. Come help build it. WATCH Oren’s full visit and interview. Subscribe to TravelingIsrael dot com on YouTube — link in comments. Interested in volunteering with The Israel Guys? That link is also in the comments. Traveling israel The Israel Guys

🗺️ TOUR TUESDAY: TOURING ISRAEL CAN ALSO MEAN VOLUNTEERING (Part of our scheduled daily content lineup — always pinned.) This week, My friend Oren from TravelingIsrael dot com heads into the hills of Samaria to visit The Israel Guys at their new center in Har Bracha. Most people think of touring Israel as visiting Jerusalem, Masada or the Sea of Galilee. But there is another way to experience the country: Come volunteer. Work the land. Meet the people. Become part of the story. Oren sits down with Joshua Waller, CEO of The Israel Guys, whose family came from Tennessee and has spent more than two decades bringing Christian volunteers to Israel. Their volunteers have helped develop roughly 120 farms across Judea and Samaria, with more than 5,000 long-term volunteers coming from dozens of countries. Joshua explains why they believe Christians should come to Israel not to change the Jewish people, but to serve them, strengthen them and help rebuild the land of Israel. He also addresses the claim that Christians are unwelcome or unsafe in Israel — speaking from more than 20 years of his own experience living among religious Jews in Har Bracha. For anyone planning a trip to Israel, this is worth considering: Don’t just come to see Israel. Come help build it. WATCH Oren’s full visit and interview. Subscribe to TravelingIsrael dot com on YouTube — link in comments. Interested in volunteering with The Israel Guys? That link is also in the comments. Traveling israel The Israel Guys

Mossad Commentary

24,875 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Ta-Nehisi Coates: "I don't know how you stay consistent by claiming an anti-apartheid legacy here in the United States of America while enforcing it abroad." Coates is implying that Israel, a state that guarantees full rights to all citizens regardless of background, is an apartheid. This isn't the first time. Coates once made a trip to the West Bank, which he concluded is an apartheid. There are problems in the West Bank, that's for sure, but Coates assigns all blame to Israel for attempts to protect its citizens, and none to Palestinian leadership who pay salaries to terrorists. Of course, to Coates, the specifics hardly matter, as he admits this is less about what you believe, and more about getting elected. When the truth doesn't matter, when Jewish life isn't considered worthy of protection, and when winning elections is straightforwardly the goal, Coates is right about one thing. That is not a continuation of a legacy of fighting for justice. Not at all.

Ta-Nehisi Coates: "I don't know how you stay consistent by claiming an anti-apartheid legacy here in the United States of America while enforcing it abroad." Coates is implying that Israel, a state that guarantees full rights to all citizens regardless of background, is an apartheid. This isn't the first time. Coates once made a trip to the West Bank, which he concluded is an apartheid. There are problems in the West Bank, that's for sure, but Coates assigns all blame to Israel for attempts to protect its citizens, and none to Palestinian leadership who pay salaries to terrorists. Of course, to Coates, the specifics hardly matter, as he admits this is less about what you believe, and more about getting elected. When the truth doesn't matter, when Jewish life isn't considered worthy of protection, and when winning elections is straightforwardly the goal, Coates is right about one thing. That is not a continuation of a legacy of fighting for justice. Not at all.

Hen Mazzig

65,506 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨GREATER ISRAEL PLAN: ‘Israel wants to be surrounded by failed, fragmenting, or co-opted states. Its goal in Iran is STATE COLLAPSE, NOT regime change.’ —Former Israeli Peace Negotiator Daniel Levy ‘What I’m suggesting is that the notion of a Greater Israel dominion, a project of domination in the region, is not just about territory. It’s about how far Israel can extend its hard power hegemony. And to do that, it wants to create a situation where it is surrounded by states that are either collapsed, in the process of fragmenting and dismantling, and therefore cannot prevent any challenge to that hard power Greater Israel project… Or states which find themselves easily co-opted by Israel because of vulnerabilities and dependencies that are brought into play, often actively by Israel. What Israel is trying to do is not some dream of regime change in Iran. It doesn’t really believe that. It’s going for regime and state collapse, chaos that then spills over. So that deals with Iran. Saudi Arabia being attacked in the war on Iran was by design as far as the Israelis are concerned. Because part of the goal here is to weaken the Gulf states so that they look around and they say, ‘America couldn’t deliver for us. We may not all like it, but there is a major regional power here and we are going to have to get on board with its project.’ Israel has talked openly about not only being a regional superpower, but Netanyahu has said becoming a global superpower. It’s talked about corridors for transporting Gulf oil to market that would run through to Israel’s Mediterranean ports. So it is trying to create Gulf dependencies on Israel. I’m not saying it will succeed.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨GREATER ISRAEL PLAN: ‘Israel wants to be surrounded by failed, fragmenting, or co-opted states. Its goal in Iran is STATE COLLAPSE, NOT regime change.’ —Former Israeli Peace Negotiator Daniel Levy ‘What I’m suggesting is that the notion of a Greater Israel dominion, a project of domination in the region, is not just about territory. It’s about how far Israel can extend its hard power hegemony. And to do that, it wants to create a situation where it is surrounded by states that are either collapsed, in the process of fragmenting and dismantling, and therefore cannot prevent any challenge to that hard power Greater Israel project… Or states which find themselves easily co-opted by Israel because of vulnerabilities and dependencies that are brought into play, often actively by Israel. What Israel is trying to do is not some dream of regime change in Iran. It doesn’t really believe that. It’s going for regime and state collapse, chaos that then spills over. So that deals with Iran. Saudi Arabia being attacked in the war on Iran was by design as far as the Israelis are concerned. Because part of the goal here is to weaken the Gulf states so that they look around and they say, ‘America couldn’t deliver for us. We may not all like it, but there is a major regional power here and we are going to have to get on board with its project.’ Israel has talked openly about not only being a regional superpower, but Netanyahu has said becoming a global superpower. It’s talked about corridors for transporting Gulf oil to market that would run through to Israel’s Mediterranean ports. So it is trying to create Gulf dependencies on Israel. I’m not saying it will succeed.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

47,005 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“Why Is the GOP Using Leftist Talking Points?” JD Vance wants the world to know there’s a difference between anti-Zionism (hatred of Israel) and antisemitism (Jew hatred)… And in doing so, he’s showing exactly why the GOP is increasingly adopting leftist talking points on Israel and Jews. The problem with that is simple: who is an anti-Zionist who isn’t an antisemite? I’ve yet to find someone who hates Israel and loves Jews. I have found plenty of people on the left who hate both, but shield themselves from pushback with the pathetic trope of “anti-Zionism isn’t antisemitism.” When you, VP, dismiss the rise of antisemitism on the right by saying it doesn’t show up in the demographics, you’re not being an anti-Zionist. You’re avoiding the argument altogether. Because if you actually looked, you’d see a wicked rise in Jew hatred among younger voters across the aisle. The Zoomers aren’t just being anti-Zionists. You know who knows this? The person you were chatting with last night at your Noel-themed Hanukkah party. Yes! When an avowed White Nationalist and founder of Vanguard University’s Turning Point USA chapter, Sarah Stock ✟, engages in identity politics and says, “White… Zoomers don’t really like Israel anymore,” she’s not being an anti-Zionist. When Theo Von lies about Israel “murdering” children and committing genocide TO YOUR FACE, he’s not being an anti-Zionist. When Tucker Carlson lies about Israel—while promoting terror-supporting (and U.S.-ally) Qatar—he’s not being an anti-Zionist. You’re turning the GOP into the Left. You’re undoing almost all the good work Donald Trump has done waging—and winning—the culture wars. The GOP is weak. Feckless. And YOU are Lord Cardigan at the front of the Light Brigade, leading your own side straight into certain doom. I don’t know why you’re doing this. I just know what I’m seeing. And what I’m seeing is a catastrophe in the making. The great news is there’s a way to fix this. Just stop. Show some bravery. Show some introspection. Change course. Or, ya know, keep parroting leftist talking points, keep fanning the flames of hatred, and charge straight into that artillery fire. I’m sure it’ll work out just fine for you… and for the GOP.

“Why Is the GOP Using Leftist Talking Points?” JD Vance wants the world to know there’s a difference between anti-Zionism (hatred of Israel) and antisemitism (Jew hatred)… And in doing so, he’s showing exactly why the GOP is increasingly adopting leftist talking points on Israel and Jews. The problem with that is simple: who is an anti-Zionist who isn’t an antisemite? I’ve yet to find someone who hates Israel and loves Jews. I have found plenty of people on the left who hate both, but shield themselves from pushback with the pathetic trope of “anti-Zionism isn’t antisemitism.” When you, VP, dismiss the rise of antisemitism on the right by saying it doesn’t show up in the demographics, you’re not being an anti-Zionist. You’re avoiding the argument altogether. Because if you actually looked, you’d see a wicked rise in Jew hatred among younger voters across the aisle. The Zoomers aren’t just being anti-Zionists. You know who knows this? The person you were chatting with last night at your Noel-themed Hanukkah party. Yes! When an avowed White Nationalist and founder of Vanguard University’s Turning Point USA chapter, Sarah Stock ✟, engages in identity politics and says, “White… Zoomers don’t really like Israel anymore,” she’s not being an anti-Zionist. When Theo Von lies about Israel “murdering” children and committing genocide TO YOUR FACE, he’s not being an anti-Zionist. When Tucker Carlson lies about Israel—while promoting terror-supporting (and U.S.-ally) Qatar—he’s not being an anti-Zionist. You’re turning the GOP into the Left. You’re undoing almost all the good work Donald Trump has done waging—and winning—the culture wars. The GOP is weak. Feckless. And YOU are Lord Cardigan at the front of the Light Brigade, leading your own side straight into certain doom. I don’t know why you’re doing this. I just know what I’m seeing. And what I’m seeing is a catastrophe in the making. The great news is there’s a way to fix this. Just stop. Show some bravery. Show some introspection. Change course. Or, ya know, keep parroting leftist talking points, keep fanning the flames of hatred, and charge straight into that artillery fire. I’m sure it’ll work out just fine for you… and for the GOP.

Jake Donnelly

51,701 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

This was a pro-Palestine rally in New York. As you can see, it was only during the BLM protests three years ago that we had such a large crowd. I've been trying to understand what's going on. What changes are taking place? What messages are being sent? The government was saying, we stand with Israel. The media outlets were saying, we stand with Israel. The New York City Mayor also said we stand with Israel. Online influencers were saying, we stand with Israel. But across the country and the world, pro-Palestinian rallies were growing in numbers and attendance in the streets. Many people were dismissing them as terrorists or terrorists' sympathizers. But, very few people really tried to understand the social movement or change that was taking place. My question has been the same, how is it that the people on the street are going against the recommendations and advice of politicians in Washington, London, Paris, and everywhere else across the world? Why are they not simply listening to the mainstream media? It seems to me that this is not just about Palestine and Israel. This is something much bigger, much deeper, and widespread, which we do not yet understand, despite some simple explanations thrown out here and there by people who have not even been at any of those rallies and rely only on some online clips.

This was a pro-Palestine rally in New York. As you can see, it was only during the BLM protests three years ago that we had such a large crowd. I've been trying to understand what's going on. What changes are taking place? What messages are being sent? The government was saying, we stand with Israel. The media outlets were saying, we stand with Israel. The New York City Mayor also said we stand with Israel. Online influencers were saying, we stand with Israel. But across the country and the world, pro-Palestinian rallies were growing in numbers and attendance in the streets. Many people were dismissing them as terrorists or terrorists' sympathizers. But, very few people really tried to understand the social movement or change that was taking place. My question has been the same, how is it that the people on the street are going against the recommendations and advice of politicians in Washington, London, Paris, and everywhere else across the world? Why are they not simply listening to the mainstream media? It seems to me that this is not just about Palestine and Israel. This is something much bigger, much deeper, and widespread, which we do not yet understand, despite some simple explanations thrown out here and there by people who have not even been at any of those rallies and rely only on some online clips.

Simon Ateba

1,016,879 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?

Tucker: "Neocons" like Ben Shapiro only care about money for Israel. Fuentes: Jews like Shapiro are only "here" to... get money for Israel. Tucker didn't just interview Fuentes; he has adopted his language and framing, but with "neocons" instead of Jews. In the clips below, both use ad hominem attacks to escape engaging any actual argument over the efficacy of U.S. support for Israel. Of course, Fuentes and Tucker utilize the oldest of anti-Semitic tropes, the notion of Jews (or "neocons") having dual loyalties, which has been weaponized for thousands of years to sow distrust and eventually hatred for thousands of years. Opposing financial support of Israel is an entirely legitimate position that can easily be justified using conservative principles. Plenty of conservatives have been opposed to the U.S. annual military aid to Israel, including figures as diverse as Rand Paul and, yes, Ben Shapiro. Maybe that's why the primary defense of Tucker by Megyn Kelly and others has been that he's somehow just "criticizing Israel." But when Fuentes said in 2023 that Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Mark Levin, and Joel Pollak "are running American media" and are "here (apparently living in the U.S.) to make sure Americans support the country they really care about," what possible argument is he making about policy? The same holds true when Tucker Carlson just this month said that "Shapiro and all of these guys" don't "care" about their own audiences "at all" (or, by implication, America at large) because their supposed tactic is "give us money for our preferred little country, or we're going to denounce you!" Put another way, what could Fuentes or Tucker possibly be trying to advance besides the notion that the views of Shapiro/Jews/"neocons" should not be trusted on any issue, even those having nothing to do with Israel?

Joel Mowbray

165,513 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Ben Dismantles the Online Narrative Around His Tiff With Megyn Kelly! "The reason they’re doing that is to misdirect away from their lack of basic moral character and basic moral sense." ~ Ben Shapiro In a sharp, no-holds-barred segment, Ben made it crystal clear the whole thing had zero to do with Israel. “She started saying things like, ‘I can’t even be critical of Israel.’ Well, that’s the get-out-of-jail-free card,” he explained. The real trigger, he said, was Megyn’s refusal to criticize Candace Owens for slandering Charlie Kirk’s widow. Recalling their onstage exchange about Tucker Carlson, Ben remembered pressing her: “I’d be happy to go fishing with Tucker, but that has nothing to do with whether he is right or wrong on principle… that’s what friendship very often is—actually course-correcting people.” When he asked why she wouldn’t call out the slander against Erica Kirk, the response flipped to “Ben only said that because he’s Israel-first.” Ben fired back: “In that entire narrative, I never brought up Israel. Literally, not once.” He pointed out that in his TPUSA speech he never mentioned Israel at all; his only antisemitism call-out was directed at self-described antisemite Nick Fuentes. Yet critics like Megyn spun it as dual-loyalty proof. “The reason they’re doing that is to misdirect away from their lack of basic moral character and basic moral sense,” he said, “and of course to not so subtly imply that the only thing that I care about in the world is Israel because I’m an Israel-first with dual loyalty and all the usual tropes.” Tafsik Organization and Stop Antizionism are proud to announce the World Symposium Against Antizionism, a landmark full-day conference that took place on May 17th, 2026. As the first conference in the world specifically dedicated to combatting Antizionism, this event brought together world-renowned advocates, leaders, and speakers for a day of critical dialogue and action. Ben Shapiro was the keynote speaker to start the conference. Many more high-profile speakers also were featured at the event.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

46,157 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“Mehdi Hasan DEBUNKS Bret Stephens’ “Gaza Isn’t Genocide” Argument” Mehdi Hasan: The genocide in Gaza is “farcical.” That's the view of New York Times columnist Bret Stephens. So let's take on his viral arguments and rebut each of them. Bret Stephens: If Israel wanted to commit genocide, if Israel wanted to kill every single Palestinian, it could have. It is a nuclear power. Mehdi Hasan: I can't say this often enough: killing every single person is not actually the definition of genocide. The legal definition under the 1948 Genocide Convention is acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Four of those five criteria don't mention killing at all. We don't apply this “kill every single person” definition to other genocides. The US government declared the killing of the Rohingyas in Myanmar a genocide, but Myanmar didn't kill all of them. The US also declared the persecution of the Uyghurs in China a genocide, but China hasn't killed every Uyghur. Joe Biden called Russia's war on Ukraine a genocide. Russia is a nuclear power. Putin could nuke all of the Ukrainians if he wanted to. He has not. Bret Stephens: If Israel were trying to commit genocide in Gaza, why did it distribute polio vaccines? Mehdi Hasan: First off, Israel did not distribute polio vaccines in Gaza in 2024; the World Health Organization did. Israel simply agreed to occasionally pause its bombing campaign to allow the WHO to do their work. And why? Not simply out of the goodness of their hearts. Israel's own officials said the vaccination campaign was important to stop the disease spreading into Israel. Human Rights Watch also said Israel's attacks on healthcare infrastructure and water supplies, and its blocking of humanitarian aid, had inflamed the polio outbreak. Bret Stephens: If Israel were trying to commit genocide in Gaza, why did it allow any food at all? Mehdi Hasan: Well, not because they wanted to, Bret. Israel was pressured by the Biden administration into allowing in tiny amounts of food. Netanyahu agreed to let in only a small amount of supplies and even asked that this concession remain secret. Yeah, that's not genocidal at all.

“Mehdi Hasan DEBUNKS Bret Stephens’ “Gaza Isn’t Genocide” Argument” Mehdi Hasan: The genocide in Gaza is “farcical.” That's the view of New York Times columnist Bret Stephens. So let's take on his viral arguments and rebut each of them. Bret Stephens: If Israel wanted to commit genocide, if Israel wanted to kill every single Palestinian, it could have. It is a nuclear power. Mehdi Hasan: I can't say this often enough: killing every single person is not actually the definition of genocide. The legal definition under the 1948 Genocide Convention is acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Four of those five criteria don't mention killing at all. We don't apply this “kill every single person” definition to other genocides. The US government declared the killing of the Rohingyas in Myanmar a genocide, but Myanmar didn't kill all of them. The US also declared the persecution of the Uyghurs in China a genocide, but China hasn't killed every Uyghur. Joe Biden called Russia's war on Ukraine a genocide. Russia is a nuclear power. Putin could nuke all of the Ukrainians if he wanted to. He has not. Bret Stephens: If Israel were trying to commit genocide in Gaza, why did it distribute polio vaccines? Mehdi Hasan: First off, Israel did not distribute polio vaccines in Gaza in 2024; the World Health Organization did. Israel simply agreed to occasionally pause its bombing campaign to allow the WHO to do their work. And why? Not simply out of the goodness of their hearts. Israel's own officials said the vaccination campaign was important to stop the disease spreading into Israel. Human Rights Watch also said Israel's attacks on healthcare infrastructure and water supplies, and its blocking of humanitarian aid, had inflamed the polio outbreak. Bret Stephens: If Israel were trying to commit genocide in Gaza, why did it allow any food at all? Mehdi Hasan: Well, not because they wanted to, Bret. Israel was pressured by the Biden administration into allowing in tiny amounts of food. Netanyahu agreed to let in only a small amount of supplies and even asked that this concession remain secret. Yeah, that's not genocidal at all.

Jeff

41,157 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Mehdi Hasan & Bassem Youssef TEAR Into Bill Maher Over His Obsession With Israel Mehdi Hasan: Before we finish, I've got to throw one last name in here: Bill Maher. Bill Maher recently said, "Israel's never started a war, it's always attacked first," and called claims of colonization and genocide antisemitism. He said, if he has to be on one side of MAGA Trump or Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes he'll be with Trump. Bassem Youssef: He's adopting your same side. Mehdi Hasan: The thing that pisses me off is Bill Maher saying Joe Kent said, "The Jews made us do it." He didn't say that. He referred to Israel. It's actually antisemitic to conflate Jews with Israel, which is what Bill Maher's doing. It's always about Israel, and then they say it's about antisemitism. Bassem Youssef: What is really pissing me off is, why are we still speaking about Bill Maher in any other capacity other than that he is a 100% pro-Israel asset? Mehdi Hasan: I think you're actually doing him a favour with that argument. I don't think he needs to be paid. He's an ideologue. He's believed this stuff all his life. I think he's a hardcore Zionist in his heart. Bassem Youssef: Bill Maher has a famous documentary called Religulous. He went and made fun of all religions. He went to the Muslims and made fun of them. Then he went to the Christians and made fun of them. And when he went to the Jews, who did he make fun of? Neturei Karta the anti-Israeli Jewish group. Mehdi Hasan: For him, Israel is everything. He's a noted atheist, but he's fine with the Jewish state run by theocrats. Bassem Youssef: He's an atheist who's like, "Well, it was given to them by God!" What is wrong with you? Mehdi Hasan: My biggest objection to Bill Maher is not his Zionism, it's not his Islamophobia, it's not his racism, it's not his misogyny. It's the fact he's not funny. Bassem Youssef: He's not funny at all. Mehdi Hasan: It's like when Henry Kissinger got the Nobel Peace Prize. Bassem Youssef: That's the perfect analogy.

Mehdi Hasan & Bassem Youssef TEAR Into Bill Maher Over His Obsession With Israel Mehdi Hasan: Before we finish, I've got to throw one last name in here: Bill Maher. Bill Maher recently said, "Israel's never started a war, it's always attacked first," and called claims of colonization and genocide antisemitism. He said, if he has to be on one side of MAGA Trump or Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes he'll be with Trump. Bassem Youssef: He's adopting your same side. Mehdi Hasan: The thing that pisses me off is Bill Maher saying Joe Kent said, "The Jews made us do it." He didn't say that. He referred to Israel. It's actually antisemitic to conflate Jews with Israel, which is what Bill Maher's doing. It's always about Israel, and then they say it's about antisemitism. Bassem Youssef: What is really pissing me off is, why are we still speaking about Bill Maher in any other capacity other than that he is a 100% pro-Israel asset? Mehdi Hasan: I think you're actually doing him a favour with that argument. I don't think he needs to be paid. He's an ideologue. He's believed this stuff all his life. I think he's a hardcore Zionist in his heart. Bassem Youssef: Bill Maher has a famous documentary called Religulous. He went and made fun of all religions. He went to the Muslims and made fun of them. Then he went to the Christians and made fun of them. And when he went to the Jews, who did he make fun of? Neturei Karta the anti-Israeli Jewish group. Mehdi Hasan: For him, Israel is everything. He's a noted atheist, but he's fine with the Jewish state run by theocrats. Bassem Youssef: He's an atheist who's like, "Well, it was given to them by God!" What is wrong with you? Mehdi Hasan: My biggest objection to Bill Maher is not his Zionism, it's not his Islamophobia, it's not his racism, it's not his misogyny. It's the fact he's not funny. Bassem Youssef: He's not funny at all. Mehdi Hasan: It's like when Henry Kissinger got the Nobel Peace Prize. Bassem Youssef: That's the perfect analogy.

Jeff

45,045 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy: ‘J.D. Vance’s anti-Israel comments are a SEA CHANGE in American politics, it’s GAME ON against the Israel lobby.’ ‘The fascinating thing for me is that J.D. Vance has clearly made a political calculation. He sees political advantage in a Republican political setting in taking these positions vis-a-vis Israel… I don’t believe that for one moment. I believe that J.D. Vance is making a political calculation, that this will help him. And that to me is an absolute sea change in American politics. Almost irrespective of whether it comes off or not. The fact that a leading Republican contender for the Presidency has said, this is how I’m going to approach trying to get the nomination. This is going to be one of the building blocks for my candidacy tells us so much about the shift in the American political scene when it comes to Israel. We know, and that’s happening on the Republican MAGA side. We know, on the Democrat side that there is this contestation between those who say, listen to our voters, listen to why Kamala Harris lost, why people weren’t mobilised, enthused. One of those reasons was our appalling position on Gaza. We have to do better, we have to change. And there are others who are saying, yeah, but we’re not actually going to change. Can we just pretend that we care and get on with policy as usual? All this is going to play out. What I’m saying is we are in unprecedented terrain when it comes to Israel in the American political debate. And at the same time, do not underestimate the capacity that the lobby still has to try and sway things in its favour. Whether that’s independent campaign expenditure, given how money can play a role in American politics, given. Given whether that is how deeply embedded in Israeli narratives American media and politics is. There’s so much that they still have going for them, but it is game on, no doubt about it.’ —Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy: ‘J.D. Vance’s anti-Israel comments are a SEA CHANGE in American politics, it’s GAME ON against the Israel lobby.’ ‘The fascinating thing for me is that J.D. Vance has clearly made a political calculation. He sees political advantage in a Republican political setting in taking these positions vis-a-vis Israel… I don’t believe that for one moment. I believe that J.D. Vance is making a political calculation, that this will help him. And that to me is an absolute sea change in American politics. Almost irrespective of whether it comes off or not. The fact that a leading Republican contender for the Presidency has said, this is how I’m going to approach trying to get the nomination. This is going to be one of the building blocks for my candidacy tells us so much about the shift in the American political scene when it comes to Israel. We know, and that’s happening on the Republican MAGA side. We know, on the Democrat side that there is this contestation between those who say, listen to our voters, listen to why Kamala Harris lost, why people weren’t mobilised, enthused. One of those reasons was our appalling position on Gaza. We have to do better, we have to change. And there are others who are saying, yeah, but we’re not actually going to change. Can we just pretend that we care and get on with policy as usual? All this is going to play out. What I’m saying is we are in unprecedented terrain when it comes to Israel in the American political debate. And at the same time, do not underestimate the capacity that the lobby still has to try and sway things in its favour. Whether that’s independent campaign expenditure, given how money can play a role in American politics, given. Given whether that is how deeply embedded in Israeli narratives American media and politics is. There’s so much that they still have going for them, but it is game on, no doubt about it.’ —Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

16,699 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

From July 2024: Nick Fuentes makes the case for sending foreign aid to Israel. -- TRANSCRIPT The president's policy is, let's make Israel independent from the United States. That's not good for the United States. And this is gonna sound, like, you know, counterintuitive, but you know, you could look it up. Last summer, all the Jews got—this sounds dumb the way I'm saying it—but look up Tablet Magazine. It's a Jewish paper. In July 2023, they did a symposium on foreign aid to Israel. And so, all of their contributors wrote, you know, for or against, whether we should get rid of it or not get rid of it. And—the guy's name is Siegel, he's, like, a prominent neocon, his dad's a big neocon, and they're connected to everybody. And the main article says, "We need to get rid of foreign aid to Israel," but not for the reason that you'd think. You know, we all thought we were based for being against foreign to aid to Israel, and for obvious reasons—"We need to spend the tax dollars here!"—True! But what Siegel—I think his name's Jacob Siegel; his dad's Fred Siegel—What Jacob Siegel argues is, no, we need to rid of foreign aid to Israel because it's acting as golden handcuffs. They're saying that as America, as the left becomes more anti-Israel—and the left is hegemonic—the United States will use the aid that they give to Israel to leverage Israel and restrain Israel. He said, "So, we need to get rid of the foreign aid so we can be completely independent. And we can do whatever we want. And the United States can't control us." So, the most militant Zionists are now actually arguing against the foreign aid. And that's why, by the way, you know, when Matt Walsh at Daily Wire says "We shouldn't send foreign to Israel," and Jeremy Boreing and Ben Shapiro say, "Oh, well, you know, you don't get fired for—" And Shapiro and Boreing say "Oh, see, we allow a rebuttal. We allow the different opinion on our show." Yeah, that's because that actually helps them. They don't want the foreign aid because they—some of these so-called revisionist Zionists, Jewish maximalists—they want to get rid of the foreign aid so they have the freedom of action. And JD Vance, looking to him—he runs a hedge fund, he was with Peter Thiel, the guy's like a Straussian—JD Vance says: We need to arm Israel so they can conduct an independent foreign policy. We need to arm them so that they can confront Iran. So like, this is the policy. And the policy is to make Israel independent of us. But, you know, we want these countries—It's actually ironically America First to make these countries dependent on us.

From July 2024: Nick Fuentes makes the case for sending foreign aid to Israel. -- TRANSCRIPT The president's policy is, let's make Israel independent from the United States. That's not good for the United States. And this is gonna sound, like, you know, counterintuitive, but you know, you could look it up. Last summer, all the Jews got—this sounds dumb the way I'm saying it—but look up Tablet Magazine. It's a Jewish paper. In July 2023, they did a symposium on foreign aid to Israel. And so, all of their contributors wrote, you know, for or against, whether we should get rid of it or not get rid of it. And—the guy's name is Siegel, he's, like, a prominent neocon, his dad's a big neocon, and they're connected to everybody. And the main article says, "We need to get rid of foreign aid to Israel," but not for the reason that you'd think. You know, we all thought we were based for being against foreign to aid to Israel, and for obvious reasons—"We need to spend the tax dollars here!"—True! But what Siegel—I think his name's Jacob Siegel; his dad's Fred Siegel—What Jacob Siegel argues is, no, we need to rid of foreign aid to Israel because it's acting as golden handcuffs. They're saying that as America, as the left becomes more anti-Israel—and the left is hegemonic—the United States will use the aid that they give to Israel to leverage Israel and restrain Israel. He said, "So, we need to get rid of the foreign aid so we can be completely independent. And we can do whatever we want. And the United States can't control us." So, the most militant Zionists are now actually arguing against the foreign aid. And that's why, by the way, you know, when Matt Walsh at Daily Wire says "We shouldn't send foreign to Israel," and Jeremy Boreing and Ben Shapiro say, "Oh, well, you know, you don't get fired for—" And Shapiro and Boreing say "Oh, see, we allow a rebuttal. We allow the different opinion on our show." Yeah, that's because that actually helps them. They don't want the foreign aid because they—some of these so-called revisionist Zionists, Jewish maximalists—they want to get rid of the foreign aid so they have the freedom of action. And JD Vance, looking to him—he runs a hedge fund, he was with Peter Thiel, the guy's like a Straussian—JD Vance says: We need to arm Israel so they can conduct an independent foreign policy. We need to arm them so that they can confront Iran. So like, this is the policy. And the policy is to make Israel independent of us. But, you know, we want these countries—It's actually ironically America First to make these countries dependent on us.

Max 📟

13,612 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

The United States of Israel is the most powerful nation in the West, Ruled over by Benjamin Netanyahu and all the freedom hating Zionists. It used to be called America until the President tore off the disguise, And we could all see that it was Israel that was hiding behind the lies. Protecting Israel is America’s number one priority and concern. They don’t care if the cost of saving it means the US Constitution will burn. American interests are overridden and not permitted to come first, As long as Israel controls the US government, and its rulers are coerced. The Deep State abandoned the First Amendment with a new anti-semitic law. Discarding free speech to stop criticism of Israel becoming an uproar! They send billions of dollars to Israel, instead of spending it at home. Why would you protect your own people, when you can pay for Israel’s Iron Dome? Why is Israel so important? Why do they get to exercise such control, When the ideology of Zionism is the most racist you can extol? Zionists claim to be the Chosen People, you may even call them the master race; Palestinians are second class humans, who God gave the Jew the right to displace. But it’s not just Palestinians, its anyone who holds a different view, That includes every single Christian and every non-Zionist Jew. They have perverted their own religion and the message which it’s meant to teach. Looking down on other races is a fundamental part of their hate-preach. America should be free but has been imprisoned by a Zionist elite, Sponsored by a financial cartel who rule the world through nefarious deceit. They control the Federal Reserve, the Deep State, and all the politicians too, As they disgrace their own religion and betray every genuine Jew! America has been captured by a foreign power that rules over their land, It bows and scrapes to their orders, obeying their every whim and command. The Israeli lobby means Americans don’t have proper representation, Like the Palestinians, Americans have been occupied and left without a nation. Subscribe & Follow The Mama Schwab Parody on Rumble:

The United States of Israel is the most powerful nation in the West, Ruled over by Benjamin Netanyahu and all the freedom hating Zionists. It used to be called America until the President tore off the disguise, And we could all see that it was Israel that was hiding behind the lies. Protecting Israel is America’s number one priority and concern. They don’t care if the cost of saving it means the US Constitution will burn. American interests are overridden and not permitted to come first, As long as Israel controls the US government, and its rulers are coerced. The Deep State abandoned the First Amendment with a new anti-semitic law. Discarding free speech to stop criticism of Israel becoming an uproar! They send billions of dollars to Israel, instead of spending it at home. Why would you protect your own people, when you can pay for Israel’s Iron Dome? Why is Israel so important? Why do they get to exercise such control, When the ideology of Zionism is the most racist you can extol? Zionists claim to be the Chosen People, you may even call them the master race; Palestinians are second class humans, who God gave the Jew the right to displace. But it’s not just Palestinians, its anyone who holds a different view, That includes every single Christian and every non-Zionist Jew. They have perverted their own religion and the message which it’s meant to teach. Looking down on other races is a fundamental part of their hate-preach. America should be free but has been imprisoned by a Zionist elite, Sponsored by a financial cartel who rule the world through nefarious deceit. They control the Federal Reserve, the Deep State, and all the politicians too, As they disgrace their own religion and betray every genuine Jew! America has been captured by a foreign power that rules over their land, It bows and scrapes to their orders, obeying their every whim and command. The Israeli lobby means Americans don’t have proper representation, Like the Palestinians, Americans have been occupied and left without a nation. Subscribe & Follow The Mama Schwab Parody on Rumble:

TheMamaSchwabParody

135,448 просмотров • 1 год назад

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

Open Source Intel

140,599 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

God gave Abraham what we believe was the first commandment ever issued to a Jew. It is an important commandment because, when I visit college campuses, I sometimes hear from Jewish students who lost their way on these campuses: “My Judaism requires me to be anti-Israel.” And I say, “Then you do not know much Judaism.” Because the first thing God commanded Abraham to do, in Hebrew, in the Bible, was “Lech Lecha.” What does that mean? “Go from your country, your people, and your father’s household to the land I will show you.” That means that Israel—the Land of Israel, the Holy Land, the land God promised—is the foundation stone of what it means to be Jewish. Everything else—the kosher laws, the Ten Commandments, Shabbat, Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah—came centuries, and in some cases millennia, later. To be Jewish is to yearn for Zion. That is what the Bible tells us over and over again. So that first migration, which follows the first commandment ever given to a Jew, is something we should all keep firmly in mind.

God gave Abraham what we believe was the first commandment ever issued to a Jew. It is an important commandment because, when I visit college campuses, I sometimes hear from Jewish students who lost their way on these campuses: “My Judaism requires me to be anti-Israel.” And I say, “Then you do not know much Judaism.” Because the first thing God commanded Abraham to do, in Hebrew, in the Bible, was “Lech Lecha.” What does that mean? “Go from your country, your people, and your father’s household to the land I will show you.” That means that Israel—the Land of Israel, the Holy Land, the land God promised—is the foundation stone of what it means to be Jewish. Everything else—the kosher laws, the Ten Commandments, Shabbat, Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah—came centuries, and in some cases millennia, later. To be Jewish is to yearn for Zion. That is what the Bible tells us over and over again. So that first migration, which follows the first commandment ever given to a Jew, is something we should all keep firmly in mind.

Roy K. Altman

29,331 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад