Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I'm not sure how solid this news is – it's mostly buzzing around on social media – but the real bombshell is what's coming next. In the very near future, we'll witness a mass exodus of sovereign assets from world nations, fleeing the grasping claws of the West, the...

SlavFreeSpirit's profile picture

SlavicFreeSpirit

40,047 subscribers

41,699 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨BRICS+ SUMMIT: RUSSIA🇷🇺, CHINA🇨🇳 & IRAN🇮🇷 UNDERSTAND THE THREAT FROM THE US THE MOST ‘Russia would never have started this proxy war. It was imposed on it, on Russia by the West, by the US chiefly. China is not the country pushing for confrontation with the US. It’s the US that’s pushing for confrontation against China. Iran, Russia, and China are the members of the BRICS that know from practical experience the amount of damage, military damage and economic damage that the US and the West can do, more than the other members. Brazil also knows, but we haven’t had the very tough experience that these three countries, Russia, China, and Iran, have had and are having now.’ -Prof. Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr., former Vice President of the New Development Bank, on the latest episode of Going Underground ahead of the BRICS+ Summit in Rio FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇 Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr.
1:47

🚨BRICS+ SUMMIT: RUSSIA🇷🇺, CHINA🇨🇳 & IRAN🇮🇷 UNDERSTAND THE THREAT FROM THE US THE MOST ‘Russia would never have started this proxy war. It was imposed on it, on Russia by the West, by the US chiefly. China is not the country pushing for confrontation with the US. It’s the US that’s pushing for confrontation against China. Iran, Russia, and China are the members of the BRICS that know from practical experience the amount of damage, military damage and economic damage that the US and the West can do, more than the other members. Brazil also knows, but we haven’t had the very tough experience that these three countries, Russia, China, and Iran, have had and are having now.’ -Prof. Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr., former Vice President of the New Development Bank, on the latest episode of Going Underground ahead of the BRICS+ Summit in Rio FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇 Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr.

Going Underground

59,604 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "CHINA'S SUPPORT MEANS THE WAR WILL CONTINUE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE" Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the prevailing view in the West has been to consider Russia as an economically struggling empire. Throughout the war, Western analysts have repeatedly promoted the narrative that concessions by Russia are imminent due to economic pressure. Alexander Rahr believes that the support BRICS and China will offer Russia will mean that Putin will be just as uncompromising as the West in his diametrically opposed demands. "My simple analysis would be that on the economic front, the war is being felt in the provinces. It's not happening in the cities, neither in Moscow nor in St. Petersburg. Secondly, very importantly, the war is not between the West and Russia. The BRICS countries are so much economically and psychologically supporting Russia that Russia feels strong. These countries, especially China and India, have returned Russia to the status of great power." Journalist and political scientist, Eurasien Gesellschaft
3:46

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "CHINA'S SUPPORT MEANS THE WAR WILL CONTINUE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE" Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the prevailing view in the West has been to consider Russia as an economically struggling empire. Throughout the war, Western analysts have repeatedly promoted the narrative that concessions by Russia are imminent due to economic pressure. Alexander Rahr believes that the support BRICS and China will offer Russia will mean that Putin will be just as uncompromising as the West in his diametrically opposed demands. "My simple analysis would be that on the economic front, the war is being felt in the provinces. It's not happening in the cities, neither in Moscow nor in St. Petersburg. Secondly, very importantly, the war is not between the West and Russia. The BRICS countries are so much economically and psychologically supporting Russia that Russia feels strong. These countries, especially China and India, have returned Russia to the status of great power." Journalist and political scientist, Eurasien Gesellschaft

Mario Nawfal

17,470 views • 7 months ago

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.
0:26

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 views • 3 months ago

Lavrov: We’re seeing the birth of a new world order. However, we’re seeing a fight for the contours of the future between the global majority who’d like to see a fair distribution of global wealth and civilizational diversity and the elite that are trying to use neocolonial methods of subjugation to maintain its dominance which is dying away. The hallmark of the West is the inability to embrace quality and the total inability to negotiate. The US has assumed an air of arrogance and together with Europeans they make promises, take upon themselves commitments, but do not deliver on them. As President Putin said, the West is a true Empire of Lies. In 1949 the US designed Operation Dropshot to deliver massive nuclear strikes against the USSR. The Soviet Union created its own weapons and it was only during the Cuban Missile Crisis that the idea of waging an illusional victory in a war would stop becoming the main plank of US military plans. They were never concerned that they also violated commitments as part of the OSCE not to strengthen their own security at the expense of others. We wanted to see Ukraine maintain its non-bloc status. The West continued to consistently militarize a Russophobic regime which was brought to power as part of a military coup and used to stage a hybrid war against our country. The US and European/NATO allies have declared a task to deliver a strategic blow to Russia. These politicians do not have an elementary sense of survival. They are overwhelmed and obsessed by their own impunity and lawlessness. The US-led NATO countries are trying to ramp up and upgrade their offensive capacity and are trying to weaponize space and the media landscape. The US sets up military-political mini-alliances aimed against Russia and China to undermine the inclusive regional architecture led by ASEAN. The US and Western allies have decided to add global protection to the Monroe Doctrine. These are illusory designs and extremely dangerous but the ideologists of a new edition of Pax Americana can not be halted by this. The global minority is trying to put on hold the natural development of events. President Macron expressed his sincere concern about the expansion of BRICS. They are revising the world order's principles where the West has held dominance. However, most countries will try to bolster their sovereignty and defend their national interests, traditions, cultures, and way of life. They don’t want to be lectured. They want to trade on equal and equitable terms. For the first time since 1945, we have a chance for genuine democratization in international affairs. And that inspires optimism in everyone who believes in the supremacy of international law. The US and its Western allies try to generate conflicts that would artificially divide humanity into competing blocs and prevent them from achieving shared goals. They want everyone to play according to their own nefarious rules. I would like to call on Western diplomats and politicians to re-read the UN charter, the cornerstone of the world order established after WWII as the democratic principle of the sovereign equality of states. The West still believes that it is stronger and better than the rest of humanity. The head of the EU, Mr. Borrell, is not concerned that the EU is facing an outburst of Islamophobia and intolerance to traditional values of other global religions. The West has used unilateral restrictions as a major violation of the principle of sovereign equality. And those targeted with sanctions know that these restrictions hit the most vulnerable groups of the population and trigger crises in food and energy markets. Russia demands that Western countries immediately lift economic sanctions against Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria. We can not achieve a normalization of the situation in the Middle East without the key issue: settlement of the protracted Palestinian-Israeli conflict. For more than 70 years the Palestinians have been waiting for a state that they were promised but the US is doing everything to avoid this. Decolonization must end in line with UN General Assembly resolutions. Colonial and neocolonial practices must stop. The US must reject an artificial containment of the redistribution of the voting quotas in the World Bank and the IMF. The role of the Global South must be acknowledged. We need to improve the representation of the countries from Latin America, Asia, and Africa. We need to build a new world order where there are no teachers and students, and where all questions are resolved based on consensus reflecting a balance of interests. The G20 must be depoliticized. It must focus on its initial mandate to draft mutually acceptable win-win measures in finance and the economy. We are deeply alarmed that last year Germany, Italy, and Japan voted against a UN resolution against the glorification of Nazism. Have they sincerely repented following their mass crimes against humanity? We are at a crossroads. We need to avert a global war and a disruption of the global mechanisms of cooperation that have been built over so many decades.
25:01

Lavrov: We’re seeing the birth of a new world order. However, we’re seeing a fight for the contours of the future between the global majority who’d like to see a fair distribution of global wealth and civilizational diversity and the elite that are trying to use neocolonial methods of subjugation to maintain its dominance which is dying away. The hallmark of the West is the inability to embrace quality and the total inability to negotiate. The US has assumed an air of arrogance and together with Europeans they make promises, take upon themselves commitments, but do not deliver on them. As President Putin said, the West is a true Empire of Lies. In 1949 the US designed Operation Dropshot to deliver massive nuclear strikes against the USSR. The Soviet Union created its own weapons and it was only during the Cuban Missile Crisis that the idea of waging an illusional victory in a war would stop becoming the main plank of US military plans. They were never concerned that they also violated commitments as part of the OSCE not to strengthen their own security at the expense of others. We wanted to see Ukraine maintain its non-bloc status. The West continued to consistently militarize a Russophobic regime which was brought to power as part of a military coup and used to stage a hybrid war against our country. The US and European/NATO allies have declared a task to deliver a strategic blow to Russia. These politicians do not have an elementary sense of survival. They are overwhelmed and obsessed by their own impunity and lawlessness. The US-led NATO countries are trying to ramp up and upgrade their offensive capacity and are trying to weaponize space and the media landscape. The US sets up military-political mini-alliances aimed against Russia and China to undermine the inclusive regional architecture led by ASEAN. The US and Western allies have decided to add global protection to the Monroe Doctrine. These are illusory designs and extremely dangerous but the ideologists of a new edition of Pax Americana can not be halted by this. The global minority is trying to put on hold the natural development of events. President Macron expressed his sincere concern about the expansion of BRICS. They are revising the world order's principles where the West has held dominance. However, most countries will try to bolster their sovereignty and defend their national interests, traditions, cultures, and way of life. They don’t want to be lectured. They want to trade on equal and equitable terms. For the first time since 1945, we have a chance for genuine democratization in international affairs. And that inspires optimism in everyone who believes in the supremacy of international law. The US and its Western allies try to generate conflicts that would artificially divide humanity into competing blocs and prevent them from achieving shared goals. They want everyone to play according to their own nefarious rules. I would like to call on Western diplomats and politicians to re-read the UN charter, the cornerstone of the world order established after WWII as the democratic principle of the sovereign equality of states. The West still believes that it is stronger and better than the rest of humanity. The head of the EU, Mr. Borrell, is not concerned that the EU is facing an outburst of Islamophobia and intolerance to traditional values of other global religions. The West has used unilateral restrictions as a major violation of the principle of sovereign equality. And those targeted with sanctions know that these restrictions hit the most vulnerable groups of the population and trigger crises in food and energy markets. Russia demands that Western countries immediately lift economic sanctions against Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria. We can not achieve a normalization of the situation in the Middle East without the key issue: settlement of the protracted Palestinian-Israeli conflict. For more than 70 years the Palestinians have been waiting for a state that they were promised but the US is doing everything to avoid this. Decolonization must end in line with UN General Assembly resolutions. Colonial and neocolonial practices must stop. The US must reject an artificial containment of the redistribution of the voting quotas in the World Bank and the IMF. The role of the Global South must be acknowledged. We need to improve the representation of the countries from Latin America, Asia, and Africa. We need to build a new world order where there are no teachers and students, and where all questions are resolved based on consensus reflecting a balance of interests. The G20 must be depoliticized. It must focus on its initial mandate to draft mutually acceptable win-win measures in finance and the economy. We are deeply alarmed that last year Germany, Italy, and Japan voted against a UN resolution against the glorification of Nazism. Have they sincerely repented following their mass crimes against humanity? We are at a crossroads. We need to avert a global war and a disruption of the global mechanisms of cooperation that have been built over so many decades.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

54,564 views • 2 years ago

❗️China is using Russia for super profits, but has still not transferred a single unit of weapons — Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Budanov According to Budanov, Beijing took advantage of the strengthened sanctions against Moscow and the critical need that arose in Russia for modern controllers, microchips, etc.: "China figured out how to make use of this, and Russia found a reliable partner for supplying electronics, then machine tools, then various materials from which components for weapons are produced." Budanov noted that Russia paid China significantly more than other countries, and Beijing seized this opportunity for excessive profits. On the other hand, China has been increasing its influence over Russia — as Western sanctions have intensified.
1:44

❗️China is using Russia for super profits, but has still not transferred a single unit of weapons — Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Budanov According to Budanov, Beijing took advantage of the strengthened sanctions against Moscow and the critical need that arose in Russia for modern controllers, microchips, etc.: "China figured out how to make use of this, and Russia found a reliable partner for supplying electronics, then machine tools, then various materials from which components for weapons are produced." Budanov noted that Russia paid China significantly more than other countries, and Beijing seized this opportunity for excessive profits. On the other hand, China has been increasing its influence over Russia — as Western sanctions have intensified.

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

234,169 views • 6 months ago

🌐🇧🇪Euroclear CEO warns against using frozen Russian assets to lend to Ukraine. Valérie Urbain, CEO of Belgian depository Euroclear, which manages around €185 billion in frozen Russian state assets, is urging the European Union not to touch them. In a recent interview, she warned that the plan to use the funds as collateral for a loan worth up to €165 billion for the reconstruction of Ukraine could be perceived by Russia as a confiscation, which would trigger legal and economic retaliation. “If Russia perceives this reconstruction loan to Ukraine as a confiscation of its assets, it will not stand idly by. That is why we expect legal action against Euroclear and the possible seizure of assets that we hold on behalf of our clients in Russia,” Urbain said. She added that Russia could seize Belgian assets in Russia in retaliation, which would threaten the stability of the European financial system. Euroclear, a key player in the European financial market, now holds most of the €200 billion in frozen Russian reserves since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The EU is already using the profits from these assets to prop up Kiev, but the assets themselves remain untouched. The European Commission is proposing to use them as collateral for a loan that Ukraine would repay from future Russian reparations. Belgium, where Euroclear is based, is the biggest opponent of the plan because of the risks to its economy. Urbain instead proposes using the assets as leverage in peace talks with Russia, and has implicitly ruled out legal action against the EU if the forced transfer were to take place. The European Council is expected to decide on the proposal at a summit on December 18-19.
1:09

🌐🇧🇪Euroclear CEO warns against using frozen Russian assets to lend to Ukraine. Valérie Urbain, CEO of Belgian depository Euroclear, which manages around €185 billion in frozen Russian state assets, is urging the European Union not to touch them. In a recent interview, she warned that the plan to use the funds as collateral for a loan worth up to €165 billion for the reconstruction of Ukraine could be perceived by Russia as a confiscation, which would trigger legal and economic retaliation. “If Russia perceives this reconstruction loan to Ukraine as a confiscation of its assets, it will not stand idly by. That is why we expect legal action against Euroclear and the possible seizure of assets that we hold on behalf of our clients in Russia,” Urbain said. She added that Russia could seize Belgian assets in Russia in retaliation, which would threaten the stability of the European financial system. Euroclear, a key player in the European financial market, now holds most of the €200 billion in frozen Russian reserves since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The EU is already using the profits from these assets to prop up Kiev, but the assets themselves remain untouched. The European Commission is proposing to use them as collateral for a loan that Ukraine would repay from future Russian reparations. Belgium, where Euroclear is based, is the biggest opponent of the plan because of the risks to its economy. Urbain instead proposes using the assets as leverage in peace talks with Russia, and has implicitly ruled out legal action against the EU if the forced transfer were to take place. The European Council is expected to decide on the proposal at a summit on December 18-19.

🌐geopolitics in the picture

35,598 views • 8 months ago

There it is again! 👀 Trump calls NATO a “paper tiger”, then criticizes South Korea, Japan, and Australia, for not helping us, despite benefiting from our protection. I’ve been suggesting that Trump is setting up a withdrawal of our military footprint abroad, and will consolidate our military presence to the Western hemisphere. Trump appears to be laying the ground work. I think the end goal is to withdraw from NATO, which will in turn end the war between Ukraine/Russia, then bring all the troops home to our region, then leave the areas of influence in the hands of the nations in each respective region. After Deep State destabilization assets, i.e. terrorists/cartels, have been neutralized, the need for our military presence around the globe, will no longer be necessary. I think Trump is leveraging the situation in Iran, to show the public why we need to withdraw from NATO and bring the troops home from Germany, South Korea, Japan, Australia, and more. I think Trump is using Iran to end the Cold War between the US and Russia/China, and prevent full-scale WW3 from ever happening in the future. Trump wants to make a deal with Russia and China, and this surely will include removing our standing armies from their doorstep. I think Trump is using Iran to reshape the global order to a “multi-polar world”, where a variety of nations hold spheres of influence, as opposed to the complete US hegemony. A world where we are allies/trade partners with Russia and China, not enemies on a collision course for world war. I think we are witnessing a historic global transformation.
1:53

There it is again! 👀 Trump calls NATO a “paper tiger”, then criticizes South Korea, Japan, and Australia, for not helping us, despite benefiting from our protection. I’ve been suggesting that Trump is setting up a withdrawal of our military footprint abroad, and will consolidate our military presence to the Western hemisphere. Trump appears to be laying the ground work. I think the end goal is to withdraw from NATO, which will in turn end the war between Ukraine/Russia, then bring all the troops home to our region, then leave the areas of influence in the hands of the nations in each respective region. After Deep State destabilization assets, i.e. terrorists/cartels, have been neutralized, the need for our military presence around the globe, will no longer be necessary. I think Trump is leveraging the situation in Iran, to show the public why we need to withdraw from NATO and bring the troops home from Germany, South Korea, Japan, Australia, and more. I think Trump is using Iran to end the Cold War between the US and Russia/China, and prevent full-scale WW3 from ever happening in the future. Trump wants to make a deal with Russia and China, and this surely will include removing our standing armies from their doorstep. I think Trump is using Iran to reshape the global order to a “multi-polar world”, where a variety of nations hold spheres of influence, as opposed to the complete US hegemony. A world where we are allies/trade partners with Russia and China, not enemies on a collision course for world war. I think we are witnessing a historic global transformation.

Clandestine

279,855 views • 4 months ago

Wake Up Europe ⚡️⚠️🚨🚨🚨!!!!!!!! Putin: I want ordinary Western people hear me, too. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat from your own pockets. All of that is a lie. The truth is that the problems faced by millions of people in the West are the result of many years of actions by the ruling elite of your respective countries, their mistakes, and short-sighted policies and ambitions. This elite is not thinking about how to improve the lives of their citizens in Western countries. They are obsessed with their own self-serving interests and super profits. This is evidenced by data from international organizations, which clearly demonstrate that social problems, even in leading Western countries, have only worsened in recent years, with inequality growing, the gap between rich and poor growing, and racial and national conflicts taking their toll. The myth of a Western welfare state, of the so-called golden billion, is crumbling. I repeat, today the entire planet is paying the price for the West's ambitions, for its attempts to maintain its elusive dominance by any means necessary. The imposition of sanctions is a logical continuation, a concentrated expression of the irresponsible, short-sighted policies of US and EU governments and central banks. It is they who, in recent years, have single-handedly accelerated the spiral of global inflation, their actions leading to increased global poverty and inequality, and new refugee flows around the world. And the question arises: who will now answer for the millions of deaths from starvation in the world's poorest countries due to growing food shortages? Let me repeat, this has dealt a serious blow to the entire global economy and trade, as well as to trust in the US dollar as the primary reserve currency. Thus, the illegitimate actions to freeze part of the Bank of Russia's foreign exchange reserves undermine the reliability of so-called first-class assets. In fact, both the US and the EU have declared a full-blown default on their obligations to Russia. Now everyone knows that financial reserves can simply be stolen. And, seeing this, many countries may soon begin—and I'm sure this will happen—to convert their paper and digital savings into real reserves in the form of commodities, land, food, gold, and other real assets, which will only exacerbate the shortage in these markets. I'll add that the seizure of foreign assets and the accounts of Russian companies and individuals is a lesson for national businesses as well: there is nothing safer than investing in your own country. I've personally said this repeatedly.
3:37

Wake Up Europe ⚡️⚠️🚨🚨🚨!!!!!!!! Putin: I want ordinary Western people hear me, too. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay for the efforts to counter the alleged Russian threat from your own pockets. All of that is a lie. The truth is that the problems faced by millions of people in the West are the result of many years of actions by the ruling elite of your respective countries, their mistakes, and short-sighted policies and ambitions. This elite is not thinking about how to improve the lives of their citizens in Western countries. They are obsessed with their own self-serving interests and super profits. This is evidenced by data from international organizations, which clearly demonstrate that social problems, even in leading Western countries, have only worsened in recent years, with inequality growing, the gap between rich and poor growing, and racial and national conflicts taking their toll. The myth of a Western welfare state, of the so-called golden billion, is crumbling. I repeat, today the entire planet is paying the price for the West's ambitions, for its attempts to maintain its elusive dominance by any means necessary. The imposition of sanctions is a logical continuation, a concentrated expression of the irresponsible, short-sighted policies of US and EU governments and central banks. It is they who, in recent years, have single-handedly accelerated the spiral of global inflation, their actions leading to increased global poverty and inequality, and new refugee flows around the world. And the question arises: who will now answer for the millions of deaths from starvation in the world's poorest countries due to growing food shortages? Let me repeat, this has dealt a serious blow to the entire global economy and trade, as well as to trust in the US dollar as the primary reserve currency. Thus, the illegitimate actions to freeze part of the Bank of Russia's foreign exchange reserves undermine the reliability of so-called first-class assets. In fact, both the US and the EU have declared a full-blown default on their obligations to Russia. Now everyone knows that financial reserves can simply be stolen. And, seeing this, many countries may soon begin—and I'm sure this will happen—to convert their paper and digital savings into real reserves in the form of commodities, land, food, gold, and other real assets, which will only exacerbate the shortage in these markets. I'll add that the seizure of foreign assets and the accounts of Russian companies and individuals is a lesson for national businesses as well: there is nothing safer than investing in your own country. I've personally said this repeatedly.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,858 views • 1 day ago

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin
2:31

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,786 views • 10 months ago

Countries thinking there's going to be a global reset creating a China led world order, as CCP has made everyone believe for years are mistaken. The US has already put in place a sequence of events that is going to prevent this, and put China in its place, starting with the election of Donald Trump - as I had written months before he got elected (attached post). The US has already taken control of Panama canal and Venezuela. It is a matter of time before Cuba and all of South America are in US control. The US also wants Russia on its side and Russia will mostly pivot. It knows about the China influenced US deep state that created the Ukraine war and also removed Trump in 2020. It knows China is quietly taking over Russia's north east and may invade one day. It knows China's partnership with the US was one of reasons for the fall of the USSR. For which China got rewarded with business and tech by the US. Russia will silently pivot to be friendly with the west as soon as the Ukraine war is ended (the old DS is still preventing this influencing Europe against US wishes.) The US is already at work in Iran. Once the regime goes, most of the middle east will be under US control. Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Pakistan, Bangladesh all have already been prepared to be under US fold. China has lost influence in South Asia. The US is also in control of most of the world's energy except Russia's. It is getting control of all shipping lanes and channels, especially if it exerts control on Greenland, which it is trying and may get, directly or indirectly. Those who can see all these events and connect them can understand what's happening. To think somehow China will be able to break the US hegemony, collapse the dollar without collapsing itself, and upend the world order in its favor is delusional as of now. A delusion created by the China propaganda in the last decade by influencing most of world's mainstream media and infiltrating world's social media. Not just people but many countries are still in this delusion I think. The CCP, of course, is not going to collapse without a fight causing a lot of issues in the world. Now, where this fight will be and how it will be done is anybody's guess. But my opinion has been it won't go for Taiwan. It won't go fight the US directly or indirectly. Which rules out Japan, Phillipines, and Korea. That leaves only India and Vietnam. But Vietnam's own communist party seems more aligned with China now. So that's why I say China will create conflict with India when things start going south at home. Because this conflict is manageable with no risk of US intervention and no threat of India escalating it into a devastating nuclear war as a responsible power. And by using Pakistan, it has a possibility of a limited propaganda win to keep citizens in China supporting the CCP. It already made preparation for this starting a conflict in 2020 during Covid when China was sure everything was going as per plan. It has tested India, found weaknesses and strengths, prepared itself to fill gaps, and is sitting tight for the next move. But whatever move China makes, the US will ensure it gets trapped and weakened. Be it India or Taiwan, be it another plandemic or planned dumping of US treasuries to hit the dollar, China can't escape without issues. Being a single party dictatorship, the political collapse is inevitable one day. India or the US can fight a war, lose some territory or strategic interest to China, the worst that can happen is public disillusionment, protests, a collapse of the govt and a new one elected. Think about this in China's case. This is where it is headed as economic issues hit. And that economic hit and manufactured recession is coming, mostly in the next two years (after mid terms), created by the US by Trump's actions, trade wars, and takeovers around the world.
0:29

Countries thinking there's going to be a global reset creating a China led world order, as CCP has made everyone believe for years are mistaken. The US has already put in place a sequence of events that is going to prevent this, and put China in its place, starting with the election of Donald Trump - as I had written months before he got elected (attached post). The US has already taken control of Panama canal and Venezuela. It is a matter of time before Cuba and all of South America are in US control. The US also wants Russia on its side and Russia will mostly pivot. It knows about the China influenced US deep state that created the Ukraine war and also removed Trump in 2020. It knows China is quietly taking over Russia's north east and may invade one day. It knows China's partnership with the US was one of reasons for the fall of the USSR. For which China got rewarded with business and tech by the US. Russia will silently pivot to be friendly with the west as soon as the Ukraine war is ended (the old DS is still preventing this influencing Europe against US wishes.) The US is already at work in Iran. Once the regime goes, most of the middle east will be under US control. Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Pakistan, Bangladesh all have already been prepared to be under US fold. China has lost influence in South Asia. The US is also in control of most of the world's energy except Russia's. It is getting control of all shipping lanes and channels, especially if it exerts control on Greenland, which it is trying and may get, directly or indirectly. Those who can see all these events and connect them can understand what's happening. To think somehow China will be able to break the US hegemony, collapse the dollar without collapsing itself, and upend the world order in its favor is delusional as of now. A delusion created by the China propaganda in the last decade by influencing most of world's mainstream media and infiltrating world's social media. Not just people but many countries are still in this delusion I think. The CCP, of course, is not going to collapse without a fight causing a lot of issues in the world. Now, where this fight will be and how it will be done is anybody's guess. But my opinion has been it won't go for Taiwan. It won't go fight the US directly or indirectly. Which rules out Japan, Phillipines, and Korea. That leaves only India and Vietnam. But Vietnam's own communist party seems more aligned with China now. So that's why I say China will create conflict with India when things start going south at home. Because this conflict is manageable with no risk of US intervention and no threat of India escalating it into a devastating nuclear war as a responsible power. And by using Pakistan, it has a possibility of a limited propaganda win to keep citizens in China supporting the CCP. It already made preparation for this starting a conflict in 2020 during Covid when China was sure everything was going as per plan. It has tested India, found weaknesses and strengths, prepared itself to fill gaps, and is sitting tight for the next move. But whatever move China makes, the US will ensure it gets trapped and weakened. Be it India or Taiwan, be it another plandemic or planned dumping of US treasuries to hit the dollar, China can't escape without issues. Being a single party dictatorship, the political collapse is inevitable one day. India or the US can fight a war, lose some territory or strategic interest to China, the worst that can happen is public disillusionment, protests, a collapse of the govt and a new one elected. Think about this in China's case. This is where it is headed as economic issues hit. And that economic hit and manufactured recession is coming, mostly in the next two years (after mid terms), created by the US by Trump's actions, trade wars, and takeovers around the world.

Aravind

431,734 views • 6 months ago

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that if Russia becomes "a permanent junior partner to China," it will have a bad outcome for the US and the world. "I don't know if we'll ever be successful completely at peeling them [Russia] off of a relationship with the Chinese. I also don't think having China and Russia at each other's neck is good for global stability because they're both nuclear powers," he said. According to Rubio, closer ties between Russia and China could cause "a situation where, whether Russia wants to improve its relations with the US or not, they can't because they've become completely dependent on the Chinese because we have cut them off." Sources: &
0:56

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that if Russia becomes "a permanent junior partner to China," it will have a bad outcome for the US and the world. "I don't know if we'll ever be successful completely at peeling them [Russia] off of a relationship with the Chinese. I also don't think having China and Russia at each other's neck is good for global stability because they're both nuclear powers," he said. According to Rubio, closer ties between Russia and China could cause "a situation where, whether Russia wants to improve its relations with the US or not, they can't because they've become completely dependent on the Chinese because we have cut them off." Sources: &

Anton Gerashchenko

250,522 views • 1 year ago

Any Westerner that against Israel doesn’t understand shit about Islam or geopolitics And its nothing to do with Jewish religion and you don’t have to like them Without Israel in the Middle East the west will not be able to step foot in the center of the world, it will be controlled by Nuclear Islamic caliphate together with china and Russia that will dictate the world order The Islamic caliphate alone put Europe under siege for 800 years, from Air, land and sea Why do you think there is massive propaganda campaign against Israel from China, Russia and Islam? They’re the western foothold that prevents them this leverage on the west and the power of a caliphate that want to continue the Islamic expansion by “Nuclear” Jihad
1:58

Any Westerner that against Israel doesn’t understand shit about Islam or geopolitics And its nothing to do with Jewish religion and you don’t have to like them Without Israel in the Middle East the west will not be able to step foot in the center of the world, it will be controlled by Nuclear Islamic caliphate together with china and Russia that will dictate the world order The Islamic caliphate alone put Europe under siege for 800 years, from Air, land and sea Why do you think there is massive propaganda campaign against Israel from China, Russia and Islam? They’re the western foothold that prevents them this leverage on the west and the power of a caliphate that want to continue the Islamic expansion by “Nuclear” Jihad

Bob

37,760 views • 5 months ago

There is a common misconception that I am “pro-Russia”. That is not the case. I am pro-truth, and as it pertains to this conflict, Russia have been FAR more truthful than the West and their 24/7 propaganda. Let’s look from Russia’s perspective. CIA/Deep State assets funded and armed literal Nazi paramilitary groups and conducted a color revolution in Ukraine, meddled in foreign elections, and used covert means to infiltrate and overthrow sovereign nations to claim control of their governments via proxy in Asia and Africa. If Russia did that to Canada or Mexico, the US would have invaded and every last American would have supported it. Russia didn’t bring hostilities to our border. Deep State assets embedded within the US government brought hostilities to Russia’s border, using criminal intelligence operations to destroy nations with civil war and capitalize on the chaos. Then when you add that Deep State assets were creating pathogens in their newly acquired proxy of Ukraine, which were subsequently leaking and killing Russian citizens… what exactly is Putin supposed to do? Sit there and let his citizens die, while the US are breaking International law via creating biological weapons on his nation’s border? Putin attempted to handle this situation diplomatically. Russia and China went to the UN before Russia invaded, and formally demanded that the US be investigated for biological weapons production in post-Soviet countries like Georgia and Ukraine. The US cried “disinformation” and vetoed all attempts at diplomacy. War was the final option. So when we look at the nuanced conflict in Ukraine, do I support Russia in this particular instance? Yes, I do. Not because I’m blindly pro-Russia, but because the facts indicate Russia have a legitimate reason for their actions. In addition to the fact that the US/West lied about every single thing pertaining to Trump/Russia, Covid, and Ukraine. I know there are no “good guys” in war, but Russia are significantly more in the right than the US/NATO, and if you can’t objectively admit that, you are a victim of Western propaganda.
0:35

There is a common misconception that I am “pro-Russia”. That is not the case. I am pro-truth, and as it pertains to this conflict, Russia have been FAR more truthful than the West and their 24/7 propaganda. Let’s look from Russia’s perspective. CIA/Deep State assets funded and armed literal Nazi paramilitary groups and conducted a color revolution in Ukraine, meddled in foreign elections, and used covert means to infiltrate and overthrow sovereign nations to claim control of their governments via proxy in Asia and Africa. If Russia did that to Canada or Mexico, the US would have invaded and every last American would have supported it. Russia didn’t bring hostilities to our border. Deep State assets embedded within the US government brought hostilities to Russia’s border, using criminal intelligence operations to destroy nations with civil war and capitalize on the chaos. Then when you add that Deep State assets were creating pathogens in their newly acquired proxy of Ukraine, which were subsequently leaking and killing Russian citizens… what exactly is Putin supposed to do? Sit there and let his citizens die, while the US are breaking International law via creating biological weapons on his nation’s border? Putin attempted to handle this situation diplomatically. Russia and China went to the UN before Russia invaded, and formally demanded that the US be investigated for biological weapons production in post-Soviet countries like Georgia and Ukraine. The US cried “disinformation” and vetoed all attempts at diplomacy. War was the final option. So when we look at the nuanced conflict in Ukraine, do I support Russia in this particular instance? Yes, I do. Not because I’m blindly pro-Russia, but because the facts indicate Russia have a legitimate reason for their actions. In addition to the fact that the US/West lied about every single thing pertaining to Trump/Russia, Covid, and Ukraine. I know there are no “good guys” in war, but Russia are significantly more in the right than the US/NATO, and if you can’t objectively admit that, you are a victim of Western propaganda.

Clandestine

1,272,560 views • 3 years ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On future of India-Russia ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "With all the pressure coming from the West, it is but of a challenging moment with all the pressure coming from the West and the fact that India has for now, reduced imports from Russia... One could look at the security aspects of the relationship where we've seen some delays in getting Russian military equipment to India... Energy and arms have been the key aspect of the relationship between the two... India has been trying to increase its access to Central Asia and Russia can be of help in this... China has its own influence in Central Asia. Pakistan has been trying to increase its own access to Central Asia. So with India working with Russia, its good friend, Russia could perhaps help advance India's goals in that region..."
2:51

#WATCH | Delhi | On future of India-Russia ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "With all the pressure coming from the West, it is but of a challenging moment with all the pressure coming from the West and the fact that India has for now, reduced imports from Russia... One could look at the security aspects of the relationship where we've seen some delays in getting Russian military equipment to India... Energy and arms have been the key aspect of the relationship between the two... India has been trying to increase its access to Central Asia and Russia can be of help in this... China has its own influence in Central Asia. Pakistan has been trying to increase its own access to Central Asia. So with India working with Russia, its good friend, Russia could perhaps help advance India's goals in that region..."

ANI

37,014 views • 8 months ago

Mohammed Baharoon: The UAE REFUSES to choose sides between the West and BRICS 'The UAE has been asked to choose before, and it chose not to choose. This is the whole idea of connectivity. It is not polarity anymore. This is why the UAE continues to have a very strong relationship with both the US and Russia, with Russia and Ukraine, with China and the US, with Europe and Russia. We start looking at relationships as not being forged based on ideology or political compass, but actually on what the world really needs. And in this case it's the flow of goods, of money, of people and of data.' -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Mohammed Baharoon b'huth بحوث
2:10

Mohammed Baharoon: The UAE REFUSES to choose sides between the West and BRICS 'The UAE has been asked to choose before, and it chose not to choose. This is the whole idea of connectivity. It is not polarity anymore. This is why the UAE continues to have a very strong relationship with both the US and Russia, with Russia and Ukraine, with China and the US, with Europe and Russia. We start looking at relationships as not being forged based on ideology or political compass, but actually on what the world really needs. And in this case it's the flow of goods, of money, of people and of data.' -Mohammed Baharoon, Director General of the Dubai Public Policy Research Center, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Mohammed Baharoon b'huth بحوث

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

24,661 views • 2 days ago

Hussein Askary: 'Russia🇷🇺, India🇮🇳 and China🇨🇳 must build a NEW economic security architecture in the Gulf' 'Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia have been actually involved in intensive discussions on normalising relations even with Iran and getting to some sort of a new arrangement for the Gulf. But India should not be left out of this equation. India is also an important partner for all these nations. Russia is in the background. China is in the background. It's not necessary to have American, British military existence in the GCC region, but they can arrange their security among themselves, and that India, Pakistan, Turkey, China and Russia can guarantee the security of these nations, you don't need military bases, you need economic cooperation and need to trust each other.' -Hussein Askary, Vice-Chairman of the Belt and Road Institute, and Author of 'Extending the New Silk Road to West Asia and Africa' on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Hussein Askary
3:26

Hussein Askary: 'Russia🇷🇺, India🇮🇳 and China🇨🇳 must build a NEW economic security architecture in the Gulf' 'Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia have been actually involved in intensive discussions on normalising relations even with Iran and getting to some sort of a new arrangement for the Gulf. But India should not be left out of this equation. India is also an important partner for all these nations. Russia is in the background. China is in the background. It's not necessary to have American, British military existence in the GCC region, but they can arrange their security among themselves, and that India, Pakistan, Turkey, China and Russia can guarantee the security of these nations, you don't need military bases, you need economic cooperation and need to trust each other.' -Hussein Askary, Vice-Chairman of the Belt and Road Institute, and Author of 'Extending the New Silk Road to West Asia and Africa' on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Hussein Askary

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

20,853 views • 9 days ago

7 INDICATORS THAT CHINA HAS BECOME COOL We're winning. People around the world are gradually becoming less hostile to China – as they abandon western mainstream media and see what the country is really like for themselves through social media—or by visiting China, or even by just talking to Chinese people. Seven indicators that the western media's demonization of China is faltering: . 1. The UK Daily Telegraph just printed a report in which a senior writer went into raptures about how pleasantly surprised he was to spend time in China and find clean, well-governed cities. This news outlet is normally one of the crudest and most hostile in its portrayal of China. . 2. The equally China-hostile Economist magazine printed an article titled "How China became cool", attributing its new positive image to western internet voices and video games. . 3. More people feel favorable towards China than the US for the first time in recent years, said a recent survey by research firm Morning Consult, who did the research between January and April this year. China was in positive territory scoring 8.8 in their index while the US was in negative territory with minus 1.5. . 4. A survey from Australia showed that more Australians think of China as primarily a trading partner (50%), rather than a security threat (47%). This is astonishing for two reasons. China has never had any sort of plan to attack Australia, so the fact that so many Australians believed it did, shows the power of the Australian media to brainwash an entire country. Also, the survey came from Australia's Lowy Institute – which is an organization paid to be hostile to China. The Institute is part funded by the country's Ministry of Defence, intelligence service, and western arms firms like Boeing. The survey also showed that Australians think China will be the strongest country in the world in ten years, not the United States. . 5. Another pro-western group, the Alliance of Democracies Foundation did their own survey last month. And they also found that global perceptions of China are now more positive than those of the US. . 6. Look at this very large survey from Ipsos, a European survey firm, published just a few weeks ago. China's reputation was positive around the world (above 50 on the index) – until about 2018, when a huge fake news campaign was launched, to say that China was mistreating the Uyghurs, and then the Hong Kongers, and then Taiwan and then the Philippines. But by 2024, the mainstream media's reputation had hit rock bottom, AND the cash pipeline to China demonization operations was cut—and China's reputation rose, and is now almost back to 50 on the index. But is there any heavyweight statistical analysis of this? Yes there is. . 7. An academic paper by Xiaojun Li and Yuen Yuen Ang (from US universities) looked at the link between Americans' information sources and their levels of hostility towards China. “The analysis reveals that traditional media sources, such as television, radio, and print newspapers, are associated with heightened hostility towards China," the research paper said. "In contrast, consistent engagement with online and social media is linked to lower levels of hostility, suggesting that the broader range of narratives available digitally may foster more nuanced and less adversarial views.” . The researchers said the trends were detectable even across different age groups. Whether young or old, if you were a consumer of the mainstream media, you disliked China. If you used new digital media, you didn't. . But we mustn't be complacent. The western media is a trillion dollar a year industry armed with channels that can demonize China to 100s of millions of people every day. They are bigger and stronger than we are, with our humbke internet content and our memes. But as I always say – the grasshoppers are powerful but there are more of us ants.
4:31

7 INDICATORS THAT CHINA HAS BECOME COOL We're winning. People around the world are gradually becoming less hostile to China – as they abandon western mainstream media and see what the country is really like for themselves through social media—or by visiting China, or even by just talking to Chinese people. Seven indicators that the western media's demonization of China is faltering: . 1. The UK Daily Telegraph just printed a report in which a senior writer went into raptures about how pleasantly surprised he was to spend time in China and find clean, well-governed cities. This news outlet is normally one of the crudest and most hostile in its portrayal of China. . 2. The equally China-hostile Economist magazine printed an article titled "How China became cool", attributing its new positive image to western internet voices and video games. . 3. More people feel favorable towards China than the US for the first time in recent years, said a recent survey by research firm Morning Consult, who did the research between January and April this year. China was in positive territory scoring 8.8 in their index while the US was in negative territory with minus 1.5. . 4. A survey from Australia showed that more Australians think of China as primarily a trading partner (50%), rather than a security threat (47%). This is astonishing for two reasons. China has never had any sort of plan to attack Australia, so the fact that so many Australians believed it did, shows the power of the Australian media to brainwash an entire country. Also, the survey came from Australia's Lowy Institute – which is an organization paid to be hostile to China. The Institute is part funded by the country's Ministry of Defence, intelligence service, and western arms firms like Boeing. The survey also showed that Australians think China will be the strongest country in the world in ten years, not the United States. . 5. Another pro-western group, the Alliance of Democracies Foundation did their own survey last month. And they also found that global perceptions of China are now more positive than those of the US. . 6. Look at this very large survey from Ipsos, a European survey firm, published just a few weeks ago. China's reputation was positive around the world (above 50 on the index) – until about 2018, when a huge fake news campaign was launched, to say that China was mistreating the Uyghurs, and then the Hong Kongers, and then Taiwan and then the Philippines. But by 2024, the mainstream media's reputation had hit rock bottom, AND the cash pipeline to China demonization operations was cut—and China's reputation rose, and is now almost back to 50 on the index. But is there any heavyweight statistical analysis of this? Yes there is. . 7. An academic paper by Xiaojun Li and Yuen Yuen Ang (from US universities) looked at the link between Americans' information sources and their levels of hostility towards China. “The analysis reveals that traditional media sources, such as television, radio, and print newspapers, are associated with heightened hostility towards China," the research paper said. "In contrast, consistent engagement with online and social media is linked to lower levels of hostility, suggesting that the broader range of narratives available digitally may foster more nuanced and less adversarial views.” . The researchers said the trends were detectable even across different age groups. Whether young or old, if you were a consumer of the mainstream media, you disliked China. If you used new digital media, you didn't. . But we mustn't be complacent. The western media is a trillion dollar a year industry armed with channels that can demonize China to 100s of millions of people every day. They are bigger and stronger than we are, with our humbke internet content and our memes. But as I always say – the grasshoppers are powerful but there are more of us ants.

Nury Vittachi

14,153 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...
0:33

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

Brian Berletic

102,886 views • 24 days ago

🇨🇳🇷🇺 NATO'S CHIEF RUTTE: “CHINA COULD PUSH RUSSIA TO STRIKE NATO” "For example, China would move against Taiwan. It's highly likely that China will force the junior partner in that relationship, being Russia under the leadership of Vladimir Putin, to move against NATO here, to keep us busy. For all these reasons, we have to make sure that we work as strongly together with them. And then on the hybrid threats this is of course a big worry, and we are working on it." Source: Clash Report
0:26

🇨🇳🇷🇺 NATO'S CHIEF RUTTE: “CHINA COULD PUSH RUSSIA TO STRIKE NATO” "For example, China would move against Taiwan. It's highly likely that China will force the junior partner in that relationship, being Russia under the leadership of Vladimir Putin, to move against NATO here, to keep us busy. For all these reasons, we have to make sure that we work as strongly together with them. And then on the hybrid threats this is of course a big worry, and we are working on it." Source: Clash Report

Mario Nawfal

96,122 views • 9 months ago