Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I’m so upset & disappointed with Kamala. This really solidifies the fact that there isn’t much to her & she’s just trying to win an election. Teaming with Oprah is a deal breaker for me. Take away the fact that Oprah parties with convicted or about to be convicted...

336,952 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mimi #WeLoveYouCatherine👑
Mimi #WeLoveYouCatherine👑vor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley Nancy, vote for what’s good for the country. You may not like Trump, but his policies are good for the country. Not voting is a vote for Kamala. Make your vote count. It’s worth it. You’re worth it. The country is worth it. Do it for America!

Profilbild von Marilyn Griffin
Marilyn Griffinvor 1 Jahr

Also, check out Kamala’s history with her staff. She and Meghan could be twins. And while you’re doing a deep dive, check out Trump. You’ll find out. He’s not the monster you thought he was or the morally deficient person mainstream media tells you he is. They loved him before he ran for president on the Republican side.

Profilbild von GigiDavies
GigiDaviesvor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley If Kamala thought it would get her votes, she would show up at the Brooklyn Detention Center and request a photo op with Diddy. I do sincerely feel sorry for my legitimate liberal friends. They have been hoodwinked as no party represents them anymore.

Profilbild von Cyber Rebel🇺🇸🛐
Cyber Rebel🇺🇸🛐vor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley I didn't like Kamela 20+ years ago when she was Willie Brown's side piece. She's shallow and has NO scruples. She's sent many innocent African American men to prison (who didn't deserve to be there). She's destroyed so many families; it's appalling).

Profilbild von RedChick BlueState
RedChick BlueStatevor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley Curious to know what’s keeping u from voting for Trump?

Profilbild von With Love, Nancy Duchess Of Sussex
With Love, Nancy Duchess Of Sussexvor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley I vote in Oregon. Kamala’s going to get our 8 electoral college votes either way. I really wish Trump would have denounced what Sarah Huckabee Saunders & Laura Loomer said.

Profilbild von Royally Sage
Royally Sagevor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley She is the Rachel of politics

Profilbild von ernaldo.bonitto.clarke🇺🇸
ernaldo.bonitto.clarke🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley @KamalaHarris didn’t win any primaries! Was the first one to drop out in 2020! #ScamalaHarris

Profilbild von B,Duchess of SucksAtEverything
B,Duchess of SucksAtEverythingvor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley •Abortion at 9mths •Men in girls locker room •Men in girls sport •High taxes •High prices •Mass immigration But •Oprah changed your mind ? 🤣

Profilbild von jessicush larush
jessicush larushvor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley not everyone follows the royals as closely as you do... I believe this is an over reaction.. do you really prefer the pussy grabber in chief?

Profilbild von With Love, Nancy Duchess Of Sussex
With Love, Nancy Duchess Of Sussexvor 1 Jahr

@StephanieSidley I’m going to be like the Teamsters & not endorse anyone. 😉

Ähnliche Videos

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat