Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I’m watching people lose empathy while convincing themselves they’re righteous. That’s what makes moments like this so disturbing. History shows that collective hatred rarely begins with violence. It begins with moral permission — the belief that ordinary people deserve exclusion, humiliation, or suspicion because of who they are. Criticizing...

10,432 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

There is something people still fail to understand about Palestine. Not every battle is fought first on the battlefield. Some are fought inside the human being. Some are fought against fear, humiliation, and the belief that submission is inevitable. That is why so many people connect Palestine to Karbala. Not because the events are identical, but because they see in Karbala the refusal to accept that truth is measured by power, numbers, or immediate outcomes. Imam Husayn (AS), in Shia tradition, became a symbol of refusing legitimacy to what one believes is oppression even when the cost is immense. The lesson many take from that story is not seeking death — it is refusing to let fear decide what is true. When figures in Palestinian resistance publicly speak positively about Iranian support, many supporters interpret that through that same lens: not as sect, ethnicity, or geography, but as standing with those who they believe chose support over abandonment at moments they felt isolated. To them, the real victory begins before territory. It begins when a people stop believing that defeat is their natural condition. The most dangerous thing any occupier can lose is not land. It is control over the imagination of the people. Because once people stop accepting humiliation as destiny, history changes. Karbala, for those who invoke it, was never simply about who remained standing at the end of the day. It was about what survives after sacrifice: conviction, memory, and the refusal to normalize what one sees as injustice. That is why some say: first the mind is liberated, then the land follows.

Shia Of Palestine

20,072 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

OUTSTANDING answer from Secretary Marco Rubio on the Iranian regime vs. the Iranian people: “[T]his regime is not — guys, I know I’ve said this — I think I said this in my hearing before the Senate when I got confirmed, I don’t know of any country in the world where there’s a bigger difference between the people and the people who run the country, okay? This country is run by radical Shia clerics, and that’s not what Iran and the Iranian people are. Now, they may be Shia, but they’re not radicals and they’re not clerics. And they just want a normal life and a regular life. And, in many ways, a very cosmopolitan country with a with an incredible history, incredible history, an incredible legacy and the like. So, there’s this huge divide between the people of Iran whom we sympathize with and who the President sympathize with, because they’re the ones suffering. Look, the world is a victim of Iran, okay? The world is a victim of Iran because they’re terrorists, because of what they’re doing now on the Straits. But the people of Iran are daily victims of the regime. And the president has deep sympathy for what they’re going through. And I think he’s just expressing that sympathy and that frustration that they don’t have the ability to do more to get rid of this regime that has crushed this country and isolated it from the world, which is a country that shouldn’t be isolated from the world because its people are phenomenal.”

Curtis Houck

43,429 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is one of the most powerful moments from JD Vance’s entire conversation with Joe Rogan. Rogan takes more than a minute to dismantle the socialist ideology driving Democrats like Zohran Mamdani, warning that history shows it always ends the same way. All Vance could do was sit back and agree with every point Rogan was making. ROGAN: “Those f*cking people scare me.” [Vance cracks up] “I’m really concerned that people think that’s a good idea and that they think that socialism just hasn’t been done correctly.” “That drives me nuts because I think a lot of really well-intentioned, really kind and empathetic young people think that that’s the way to go.” “And I DO NOT think they understand the dangers of this ideology because it always leads to one thing: it leads to a very powerful military government that controls the population.” “PERIOD. End of discussion.” “And if you play it out, it is literally the only way that can get people to give up their money.” “That’s the only way they can get them to give up their property.” “And when you’re hearing like Mamdani talk about freezing rents and taking bad landlords, and then confiscating their property, like…” “This is step one of what’s happened in every communist dictatorship throughout history.” “This is what happened in North Korea.” “Give the government the land and we’ll make sure that no one ever has to worry about food.” “What a great idea! Look how it turned out.”

Overton

104,373 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

One of the most significant conversations I had in Red Deer was not with a longtime political activist, a public figure, or someone who lives and breathes this stuff every day. It was with ordinary Albertans who told me they had never really been involved in politics before. They said they had never canvassed. Never stepped forward publicly like this. Never imagined they would be out on the side of the road waving flags and speaking openly about Alberta independence. And yet there they were. That matters. It matters because movements do not become real when the loudest voices get louder. They become real when regular people, people who used to stay out of politics entirely, start feeling that the situation has become too important to ignore. That is what I think this moment represents. These were not people looking for a hobby or some political tribe to join. They were people who felt that Alberta may be staring at a rare window of opportunity, and that if we let it slip through our fingers, we may never get another one like it again. That is a very different kind of energy. It is one thing for committed independence supporters to keep making the case year after year. It is another thing entirely when people who were never engaged before begin to say: This is our chance. We cannot waste it. We may not get another one. That tells me the movement is moving beyond its old boundaries. It also helps explain why this issue hits so deeply for so many families. A lot of these people are not motivated by abstract theory. They are thinking about their kids, their grandkids, their cost of living, their ability to build a future here, and whether Alberta will remain a place where ordinary people can still prosper and live with a sense of freedom and dignity. When people like that start showing up, it means the issue has become personal. And once something becomes personal, it gets much harder for the political class to dismiss it as fringe. That may be the deeper significance of what is happening. The independence movement is no longer just being carried by the usual voices. It is pulling in people who had almost given up on politics entirely. People who had tuned out. People who thought nothing would ever change. People who are now saying that maybe this is the moment when Albertans finally have to stop waiting for Ottawa to fix things and start taking responsibility for their own future. Agree or disagree with them, that is not something to laugh off. That is a sign of a population beginning to wake up. And when ordinary people start believing that this may be their last real chance to change the direction of their province, that is when movements become powerful. That is when they stop being theoretical. That is when they become hard to ignore.

Jon Alberta Patriot

17,542 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten