Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

'Imagine being pro-immigration and marrying someone supporting Reform UK?!' Political commentators Fahima Mahomed and Andy Williams debate whether couples should align politically, following reports that disagreements over Brexit can increase the risk of splitting by 60 percent.

37,537 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Gary Conway's profile picture
Gary Conway1 year ago

Imagine thinking Reform are anti-immigration 🙄

Rick's profile picture
Rick1 year ago

Not a strong marriage then and not worth saving

Ricardo 👀's profile picture
Ricardo 👀1 year ago

This channel is a waste of space.

Dan's profile picture
Dan1 year ago

Reform are pro-immigration you melt 😂

⚒Noblewoman_Markella COYI⚒'s profile picture
⚒Noblewoman_Markella COYI⚒1 year ago

This only happens when one or both are extremely immature and therefore not ready for marriage!

Lhpb's profile picture
Lhpb1 year ago

Can't listen to these two irritating guest panels... both bias-laden.

lyndsey brooks's profile picture
lyndsey brooks1 year ago

Stop giving that vile 🐄 air time

Gjergj Kastrioti's profile picture
Gjergj Kastrioti1 year ago

Fahima is the infiltration of Muslim Brotherhood. What you look around the invasion of UK is because of people like Fahima.

Dr Lucy Snatch's profile picture
Dr Lucy Snatch1 year ago

The idea of caring what football team your partner supports is even more stupid than Fahima thinking Muslim women get to choose their political opinions.

James's profile picture
James1 year ago

Imagine a world where people get on despite differences. That is the majority of the world pre this current generation whole are impregnated with thoughts with critical thinking removed.

Related Videos

Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe are battling to stop Andy Burnham from winning the Makerfield by-election. And it's getting ugly. Reform UK are standing plumber, ex-army reservist, and councillor Robert Kenyon against Restore Britain's local businesswoman Rebecca Shepherd. Kenyon is a strong candidate. He came second in the 2024 general election, with 32 percent of the vote. The press are trying to cancel him for crude humour in old social media posts, but Reform have (mostly) stood by their man for once. Whereas Shepherd is an unknown quantity, with little public profile, but far more campaigners knocking on doors in the constituency. Which is why Restore have disputed a Times / Survation poll with a small sample size, which put Reform on 40 percent, three points behind Labour's Andy Burnham, and Restore Britain on 7 percent. Restore's canvassing figures put them on 24.6 percent. Reform's internal polling also has Restore on higher than 7 percent. Hence, why Reform's senior figures, supporters, and media surrogates manned battle stations over the last few days. Their new slogan is "Vote Restore, get Burnham." Hit pieces on Restore were published by GB News, Jewish News, Daily Mail, Spiked, the Telegraph, and the Times within hours of each other. DMs were leaked. Rumours circulated, then retracted. The dirty tricks are disappointing, and offputting to supporters who sympathise with both parties. Some Reform supporters have accused Restore of being simultaneously irrelevant, polling at 1 percent, and of splitting the vote and gifting the election to Andy Burnham; of being racist and providing no distinct policy offering than Reform; of being "useful idiots" and a Trojan Horse for the Tories. But these attacks aren't convincing. The same Conservative MPs, who have since defected to Reform, accused Farage of vote splitting in 2024. Articles criticising Restore as too extreme highlight the differences between the parties on immigration policy. As Dan Hodges suggests, the attempt to sabotage Restore's chances has produced a Streisand Effect, where more Reform voters are aware of Restore than before. Have Reform damaged Kenyon's chances? Or will Restore Britain's support evaporate, and amount to nothing more than pressure placed on Reform?

Connor Tomlinson

30,355 views • 2 months ago

Journalist, "Rejoin the EU or stay out?" Andy Burnham, "I want to rejoin" "I hope in my lifetime, I want to rejoin the European Union" "I believe in the unions of all kinds. The union of the UK. The EU benefitted this country. Trade unions" "People prosper more when they're part of unions" Earlier in the interview... "Then you come to Brexit... During the 80s and 90s, the growth we had through the European Union masked some of structural problems" "But the minute you come to Brexit, then look at the last decade" "Shouldn't we start calling out the disaster that Brexit has been more directly?" "I think we should" "We've been stuck now with sluggish growth, and all of the aspirations now are harder to achieve as a country" "That's Nigel Farage and Brexiters doing, and you have to hold them accountable for that" Pippa Crerar, "Is there a danger of being seen as the same old Labour pushing to rejoin the EU?" Andy Burnham, "I don't think there's a prospect of joining any time soon, but I do think we should be honest with people" "It's not just on the economy and growth. It's immigration" "Immigration has ben weakened as a result of Brexit" "We've replaced short term immigration from the EU with long term immigration from outside the EU" "Call out Nigel Farage and Brexiters" Journalist, "Do you think Nigel Farage is racist?" Andy Burnham, "I don't know him well so I'm not going to say that. But I do see policies that are discriminatory. And that worries me"

Farrukh

292,706 views • 10 months ago

Brexit was won by the worst abuses of democracy in modern British history. Here is one of them. The "Will of the People" was used to suppress democracy after the Brexit Referendum. Lord Sumption giving the Reith Lectures addressed the Brexiters' claim that Brexit is the will of the people. He said - "This is the authentic language of totalitarianism. It is the lowest point to which a political community can sink short of actual violence." This is not about percentages. It doesn't matter what percentage voted for Brexit. It is about a referendum being used to attack the fundamental democratic right to oppose, and to promote the totalitarian division of society into the people and its enemies, the subversives and saboteurs. In the period following the referendum the so-called "Will of the People" was used to create a climate of intimidation that silenced almost all political & media opponents of Brexit. During that period Britain was not functioning as a democracy, and we are still living with its effects, pro-European politicians are still cowed by the Brexit "Will of the People". In a democracy there is government and opposition, majority and minority, competing parties and dissenting voices. There is no totalitarian unity of the "Will of the People" which makes all opponents into the enemies of the people. Where the right to oppose ends, democracy dies, and that is exactly exactly why dictators like Hitler loved referendums.

Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE

23,497 views • 1 month ago