Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Imagine feeling so good about yourself for going to a demonstration to protest against a commemoration service for the murder of innocent people. Imagine thinking that it's a great gesture of "democracy" Imagine chanting "from the river to the sea palestine will be free", not knowing (or perhaps knowing?)...

HamasAtrocities's profile picture

Hamas Atrocities

188,722 subscribers

35,641 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

.Naval: First of all, I don't think of myself. I just want to be clear on that. And that's not a rule. It's just a habit I've kind of developed because I found that thinking about yourself is a source of all unhappiness and misery. Self obsession is the root of all unhappiness. What did Buddha do? Conquer the self. What does that mean? Means that he saw through the illusion of the separate self. Did Buddha think about himself? Not for an instant. Anyone that you think of as an enlightened being does not think about themselves for an instant. The happiest people in life when people are at their best is because they love something more than they love themselves. They love their children, they love God, they love their mission, what have you. And all misery comes from rumination, from sitting around, being depressed, going in circles in your own head about me, me, me, me, me. Me is a disease. And you need a concept of a me to be effective and to keep track of things. You have a memory, you have certain predilections, you have personality patterns. But the more you self obsess, the less happy you're going to be. I guarantee you that.
0:56

.Naval: First of all, I don't think of myself. I just want to be clear on that. And that's not a rule. It's just a habit I've kind of developed because I found that thinking about yourself is a source of all unhappiness and misery. Self obsession is the root of all unhappiness. What did Buddha do? Conquer the self. What does that mean? Means that he saw through the illusion of the separate self. Did Buddha think about himself? Not for an instant. Anyone that you think of as an enlightened being does not think about themselves for an instant. The happiest people in life when people are at their best is because they love something more than they love themselves. They love their children, they love God, they love their mission, what have you. And all misery comes from rumination, from sitting around, being depressed, going in circles in your own head about me, me, me, me, me. Me is a disease. And you need a concept of a me to be effective and to keep track of things. You have a memory, you have certain predilections, you have personality patterns. But the more you self obsess, the less happy you're going to be. I guarantee you that.

Arjun Khemani

903,092 просмотров • 1 год назад

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:
3:45

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

543,004 просмотров • 2 лет назад

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.
2:17

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.

Presidency | Rwanda

68,782 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 HRH Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi: "I think it's important for President Trump Donald J. Trump not to think he's alone in that [fight against the Islamic Republic regime]. I think Europe has to overcome this anti-Trump mentality and think in terms of what really is good for them at the end of the day, for your own sake not for the sake of Americans or the Israelis, but all of us collectively knowing that we have a common problem and to transcend party politics and look at this as multi-partisan approach, as a matter of national interest."
0:30

🚨 HRH Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi: "I think it's important for President Trump Donald J. Trump not to think he's alone in that [fight against the Islamic Republic regime]. I think Europe has to overcome this anti-Trump mentality and think in terms of what really is good for them at the end of the day, for your own sake not for the sake of Americans or the Israelis, but all of us collectively knowing that we have a common problem and to transcend party politics and look at this as multi-partisan approach, as a matter of national interest."

Payam Fotouhiyehpour

12,897 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🧵1/ The children of Gaza & WB - revealing the Islamist palestinism death cult and UNTWA’s role in their use and abuse: 👉🏻To understand Israel in this war- you have to truly understand what we’re fighting. It took us 75 years, repeated monstrous terrorist attacks, that manipulated every ounce of our morality, countless monstrous statements by its leaders and one #October7th genocide attempt- for the majority of Israelis to understand that the group that defines itself as "Palestinian" is led by a palestinism death cult (with many leaders that were born in other Arab countries- like Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. and with IRGC agenda and support) that sanctifies death for the sake of Allah - suicide and murder by and of children and all others are holy and for the sake of God (as opposed to death is a necessary evil for the protection of life and the values ​​of freedom) It took us 75 years to realize that this death cult is maintained by international organizations that call themselves "guardians of human rights and international law" and have many polite and whitewashed expressions in the language of the West (colonialism, oppression, occupation, apartheid, river and sea) with the purpose of justifying, advocating for and covering up of an extremist religious sectarian ideology - a criminal and corrupt palestinism-Islamist ideology - which sanctifies the blood of children for the purposes of the sect and in the name of "God (Allah)", that glorifies the murder of innocents because they are "Jews" or “the west” whom it defines in serial brainwashing as subhumans, pigs and monkeys - that must be destroyed in order to please Allah "from the river to the sea" and then also - to destroy the control of "the West" heretics. In this cruel and unimaginably tragic picture of reality - the children are both messengers of murder, victims who grew up to sanctify their deaths and also a product of propaganda to continue the blindness of the West and its use against itself and to continue this unbearable control and exploitation of children, in the name of the death of said children. Placing the children at the heart of the violence of this death cult and this cruel cynical use of them - poses new and impossible moral dilemmas that obviously serve the death cult that has never had zero care or interest in morality. It took us 75 years to wake up from the "two state solution" propaganda fraud and that awakening was painful. It took us 75 years to realize- that while we in Israel were singing and educating for peace, working for peace and trying to reach out for humanity in every way - the death cult loyalists across the border on the other side were dreaming, singing and teaching about the blood of Jews and the war of exterminating the Jews, they were training militarily from birth to die for Allah in the holy war in which they will kill as many Jews as possible and die for “Palestine”. Even since we left Gaza in 2005 and long before that from the PA territories in the West Bank - there were (are) groups in Israel and in the world that still talk about Israeli "occupation" as if it were Gaza and the West Bank - but there (in Gaza and WB) they talk about “the occupation of Palestine from water to water" "from the river to the sea" - Including Acre, Haifa, Tel Aviv. Meaning, “liberation from occupation" means the complete destruction of Israel, a complete genocide and ethnic cleansing of its people. For them it was for 75 years: Arab Palestine (although it never existed). This thread will show the methods of this death cult that is now pushing for more power and support through “self determination” - of a criminal cruel organization that is hijacking a people with UN help and support. The first clip is from the movie: “UNRWA AT WAR” - full movie is here:
5:52

🧵1/ The children of Gaza & WB - revealing the Islamist palestinism death cult and UNTWA’s role in their use and abuse: 👉🏻To understand Israel in this war- you have to truly understand what we’re fighting. It took us 75 years, repeated monstrous terrorist attacks, that manipulated every ounce of our morality, countless monstrous statements by its leaders and one #October7th genocide attempt- for the majority of Israelis to understand that the group that defines itself as "Palestinian" is led by a palestinism death cult (with many leaders that were born in other Arab countries- like Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. and with IRGC agenda and support) that sanctifies death for the sake of Allah - suicide and murder by and of children and all others are holy and for the sake of God (as opposed to death is a necessary evil for the protection of life and the values ​​of freedom) It took us 75 years to realize that this death cult is maintained by international organizations that call themselves "guardians of human rights and international law" and have many polite and whitewashed expressions in the language of the West (colonialism, oppression, occupation, apartheid, river and sea) with the purpose of justifying, advocating for and covering up of an extremist religious sectarian ideology - a criminal and corrupt palestinism-Islamist ideology - which sanctifies the blood of children for the purposes of the sect and in the name of "God (Allah)", that glorifies the murder of innocents because they are "Jews" or “the west” whom it defines in serial brainwashing as subhumans, pigs and monkeys - that must be destroyed in order to please Allah "from the river to the sea" and then also - to destroy the control of "the West" heretics. In this cruel and unimaginably tragic picture of reality - the children are both messengers of murder, victims who grew up to sanctify their deaths and also a product of propaganda to continue the blindness of the West and its use against itself and to continue this unbearable control and exploitation of children, in the name of the death of said children. Placing the children at the heart of the violence of this death cult and this cruel cynical use of them - poses new and impossible moral dilemmas that obviously serve the death cult that has never had zero care or interest in morality. It took us 75 years to wake up from the "two state solution" propaganda fraud and that awakening was painful. It took us 75 years to realize- that while we in Israel were singing and educating for peace, working for peace and trying to reach out for humanity in every way - the death cult loyalists across the border on the other side were dreaming, singing and teaching about the blood of Jews and the war of exterminating the Jews, they were training militarily from birth to die for Allah in the holy war in which they will kill as many Jews as possible and die for “Palestine”. Even since we left Gaza in 2005 and long before that from the PA territories in the West Bank - there were (are) groups in Israel and in the world that still talk about Israeli "occupation" as if it were Gaza and the West Bank - but there (in Gaza and WB) they talk about “the occupation of Palestine from water to water" "from the river to the sea" - Including Acre, Haifa, Tel Aviv. Meaning, “liberation from occupation" means the complete destruction of Israel, a complete genocide and ethnic cleansing of its people. For them it was for 75 years: Arab Palestine (although it never existed). This thread will show the methods of this death cult that is now pushing for more power and support through “self determination” - of a criminal cruel organization that is hijacking a people with UN help and support. The first clip is from the movie: “UNRWA AT WAR” - full movie is here:

Gal G., Adv 🇮🇱

146,905 просмотров • 1 год назад

Palestine was invented almost 2000 years ago, not as a struggle for freedom, but as an attempt to erase Judea and the Jews, the people of ancient Israel. It's true that history moves in circles. At the time of Hadrian Palestine had nothing to do with "resistance" And also today, the people who call themselves "pro-pals" don't really care about the palestinians. They only advocate for the destruction of Israel
1:55

Palestine was invented almost 2000 years ago, not as a struggle for freedom, but as an attempt to erase Judea and the Jews, the people of ancient Israel. It's true that history moves in circles. At the time of Hadrian Palestine had nothing to do with "resistance" And also today, the people who call themselves "pro-pals" don't really care about the palestinians. They only advocate for the destruction of Israel

Hamas Atrocities

22,226 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed Jewish academic, Bret Weinstein, who spoke out against the policies of Israel. However, Bret didn't think Israel's policies were bad, just bad for Jews. He was appalled that his fellow Jews intepreted his criticism of Israel as him betraying "Team Jew." Truly remarkable. The moral of the story is that Jews generally don't make judgements using universal principles like "killing civilians is bad" or "bombing civilian infrastructure is wrong." Their principle is very particular: "is it good for Jews?" When reading Jewish academic writing, you'll get a sense of how ubiquitous this rationale is among Jews: "Is it good for Jews? – a question as old, in all probability, as the Jewish Diaspora itself – has not quite reached the end of its ancient career as a useful guide to thought." - Norman Podhoretz "I think they [anti-Jewish policies] warrant a revival among Jews of that ancient and prematurely laughed-off question, is it good for the Jews?" - Nathaniel Glazer "Is Europe good for the Jews?" - Steven Beller "And now a new generation of Jews comes to announce that 'Is it good for the Jews?' is an entirely reasonable, indeed self-respecting standard according to which the sociopolitical realm may be assessed. Some even insist it is the only appropriate standard." - Leonard Fein "Is it gut far Yidden?" - American Jewish Congress Setting aside the fact that the collective statement "good for Jews" demonstrates that Jews see themselves as a collective group – something they expressly forbid non-Jews from doing – Jews use "is it good for Jews" as a yardstick to measure all things. It is an end towards which everything else is made into a means: politics, history, and even the truth – the truth is not good unless it is good for Jews.
3:51

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed Jewish academic, Bret Weinstein, who spoke out against the policies of Israel. However, Bret didn't think Israel's policies were bad, just bad for Jews. He was appalled that his fellow Jews intepreted his criticism of Israel as him betraying "Team Jew." Truly remarkable. The moral of the story is that Jews generally don't make judgements using universal principles like "killing civilians is bad" or "bombing civilian infrastructure is wrong." Their principle is very particular: "is it good for Jews?" When reading Jewish academic writing, you'll get a sense of how ubiquitous this rationale is among Jews: "Is it good for Jews? – a question as old, in all probability, as the Jewish Diaspora itself – has not quite reached the end of its ancient career as a useful guide to thought." - Norman Podhoretz "I think they [anti-Jewish policies] warrant a revival among Jews of that ancient and prematurely laughed-off question, is it good for the Jews?" - Nathaniel Glazer "Is Europe good for the Jews?" - Steven Beller "And now a new generation of Jews comes to announce that 'Is it good for the Jews?' is an entirely reasonable, indeed self-respecting standard according to which the sociopolitical realm may be assessed. Some even insist it is the only appropriate standard." - Leonard Fein "Is it gut far Yidden?" - American Jewish Congress Setting aside the fact that the collective statement "good for Jews" demonstrates that Jews see themselves as a collective group – something they expressly forbid non-Jews from doing – Jews use "is it good for Jews" as a yardstick to measure all things. It is an end towards which everything else is made into a means: politics, history, and even the truth – the truth is not good unless it is good for Jews.

Curse

29,838 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”
1:09

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

RedWave Press

212,892 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Campos: I'd say pretty much everyone in the room supported what I had to say...I think it's less of a question of if they supported me, and more about their willingness to say the quiet part out loud. I think it's very easy for me to make those kinds of remarks when my livelihood does not rely on corporate media and whoever is pulling the strings at every outlet. So it's a lot scarier for them to speak out against the direction of CBS, especially those who work directly under it. But that's not to say that they don't oppose what's going on. It's just that oftentimes they lack the courage, or there's too much on the line for them to say something about it. And that's not me saying it's a good thing that they're not saying anything — it's just the reality.
1:34

Campos: I'd say pretty much everyone in the room supported what I had to say...I think it's less of a question of if they supported me, and more about their willingness to say the quiet part out loud. I think it's very easy for me to make those kinds of remarks when my livelihood does not rely on corporate media and whoever is pulling the strings at every outlet. So it's a lot scarier for them to speak out against the direction of CBS, especially those who work directly under it. But that's not to say that they don't oppose what's going on. It's just that oftentimes they lack the courage, or there's too much on the line for them to say something about it. And that's not me saying it's a good thing that they're not saying anything — it's just the reality.

MeidasTouch

60,848 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”
2:44

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,610 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Yorubas need more young people like this, who understand that pandering in the face of organized hate is not our best interest as a people. If you need to reduce yourself for others to feel good about themselves, you will always less than you are meant to be.
3:23

Yorubas need more young people like this, who understand that pandering in the face of organized hate is not our best interest as a people. If you need to reduce yourself for others to feel good about themselves, you will always less than you are meant to be.

Olufemi Adebimpe

20,490 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”
1:09

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

Dr Charlie Ward

162,094 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🚨 WOW! Vice President JD Vance reveals he initially was not a Christian, but then started to realize — "If the Christians are right about the importance of virtue, and they're right about the importance of being a good father as opposed to how much money you make, and they're right about the importance of being a good husband as opposed to how prestigious your job is, then maybe they're right about these more fundamental questions!" "I start asking, how do I be a good husband? How do I be a good provider? How do I be good at the things that actually matter? And the more that I asked those questions, the more that I felt like Christianity had the best answers. And it's interesting that that really is how it started for me." "I didn't have a conversion on the road to Damascus. But I started to see these sort of rays of sunshine, these evidences of truth in Christian teaching."
1:12

🚨 WOW! Vice President JD Vance reveals he initially was not a Christian, but then started to realize — "If the Christians are right about the importance of virtue, and they're right about the importance of being a good father as opposed to how much money you make, and they're right about the importance of being a good husband as opposed to how prestigious your job is, then maybe they're right about these more fundamental questions!" "I start asking, how do I be a good husband? How do I be a good provider? How do I be good at the things that actually matter? And the more that I asked those questions, the more that I felt like Christianity had the best answers. And it's interesting that that really is how it started for me." "I didn't have a conversion on the road to Damascus. But I started to see these sort of rays of sunshine, these evidences of truth in Christian teaching."

Eric Daugherty

409,242 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Speech in Oslo, Norway: I would like to send my message to the people in the back who are yelling “Intifada! Intifada!” Do you know that you are supporters of terrorism? Do you know that “intifada” means the bombing of innocent children and people? How dare you scream “Intifada” in Norway? A country based on equality, peace, and tolerance? This is not the 1930s anymore. The Jewish people have a state. They protect themselves — and they will continue to protect themselves. That is why they are angry. They don’t want the Jewish people to have self-determination, rights, peace, and love. They feed off fear, antisemitism, terrorism, and “intifada.” I come from Yemen, and the Houthis who are attacking Israel — their slogan starts with “Death to America.” Because this war is not about Israel. It’s about the destruction of Western civilization as we know it. The destruction of human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and everything that the West has built and fought for, for centuries. How DARE you scream “intifada” in Norway? You are a shame. Not only to Oslo, but to the Middle East, and the human species as a whole. And finally, I’d like to say: AM YISRAEL CHAI.
1:59

Speech in Oslo, Norway: I would like to send my message to the people in the back who are yelling “Intifada! Intifada!” Do you know that you are supporters of terrorism? Do you know that “intifada” means the bombing of innocent children and people? How dare you scream “Intifada” in Norway? A country based on equality, peace, and tolerance? This is not the 1930s anymore. The Jewish people have a state. They protect themselves — and they will continue to protect themselves. That is why they are angry. They don’t want the Jewish people to have self-determination, rights, peace, and love. They feed off fear, antisemitism, terrorism, and “intifada.” I come from Yemen, and the Houthis who are attacking Israel — their slogan starts with “Death to America.” Because this war is not about Israel. It’s about the destruction of Western civilization as we know it. The destruction of human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and everything that the West has built and fought for, for centuries. How DARE you scream “intifada” in Norway? You are a shame. Not only to Oslo, but to the Middle East, and the human species as a whole. And finally, I’d like to say: AM YISRAEL CHAI.

Luai Ahmed

235,158 просмотров • 1 год назад

❤️‍🔥| Taylor speaks on how she thinks part of the job of entertainers is to be mirrors: “But as sort of entertainers, one of our main jobs, I think, is to be a mirror for people. You look into the art we make. You see yourself back. The way you feel about our art has a lot to do with the life experience that you're having at this point in time, and that's why I'm so happy I have so many different albums. Like, people will come up to me and be like, 'I didn't get reputation. I didn't understand what that was like. Now, five years later, it's my favorite record.' Or evermore, or something like that. And it is like, the fun of it, for us to create a mirror for people to look into…”
3:17

❤️‍🔥| Taylor speaks on how she thinks part of the job of entertainers is to be mirrors: “But as sort of entertainers, one of our main jobs, I think, is to be a mirror for people. You look into the art we make. You see yourself back. The way you feel about our art has a lot to do with the life experience that you're having at this point in time, and that's why I'm so happy I have so many different albums. Like, people will come up to me and be like, 'I didn't get reputation. I didn't understand what that was like. Now, five years later, it's my favorite record.' Or evermore, or something like that. And it is like, the fun of it, for us to create a mirror for people to look into…”

Taylor Swift Updates 💎

280,003 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”
1:52

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,860 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."
1:15

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

Red Pill USA

760,138 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Jews themselves admit that they use rape to death, as a weapon of war. No prisoner who enters the slaughterhouses/prisons of the Jewish occupation has immunity or protection. Even if you are Western, American, Australian, or from any other country, your government will not protect you, nor will it demand retribution for you as a citizen of those countries, because the aggressor is that Jew to whom politicians in the West and the East are subservient.
1:30

Jews themselves admit that they use rape to death, as a weapon of war. No prisoner who enters the slaughterhouses/prisons of the Jewish occupation has immunity or protection. Even if you are Western, American, Australian, or from any other country, your government will not protect you, nor will it demand retribution for you as a citizen of those countries, because the aggressor is that Jew to whom politicians in the West and the East are subservient.

S. S.

14,551 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Laura Kuenssberg, "Do you agree with Prime Minister that chanting globalise the intifada is racist?" Zack Polanski, "No, I don't think that is correct" "It's important we have freedom of speech and freedom of protest" "We've seen a genocide going on for years in Israel now, in which our Labour government is not just complicit but actually selling arms and intelligence" "I don't believe policing people's language is going to make Jewish safety any better in this country" Laura Kuenssberg, "But that phrase is considered by many Jews and non-Jews to inciting violence, as we were discussing with Labour's Heidi Alexander" Zack Polanski, "First, the occupation is still ongoing, these are people talking about ending the occupation" "Second, there are already laws for hate crimes against antisemitism. When people are committing a hate crime, they should be arrested for that" "I don't think we need to create new laws" "I think we should have freedom to protest in the appropriate way, that is a cornerstone of our democracy" "And that when people are protesting they make sure they are not antisemitic, and that they are very clear that they are protesting the actions of the Israeli government" Laura Kuenssberg, "Zohran Mamdani said he would discourage the use of that phrase, would you?" Zack Polanski, "It's not a phrase that I would use personally, because you can make your point a lot more effectively in other ways" "But the point is that if people are traumatised and they're really passionate about the injustices they're seeing, I don't think the conversation should be about the language people are using" "It should be about the people who are dying" Laura Kuenssberg, "Words matter" Zack Polanski, "Words matter, but the tens of thousands of Palestinians who have been murdered, the people in Lebanon who has been killed, these people matter too" "And if people want to protest that, it's important we defend their right to protest" "I'm not interested in policing people's language"
2:51

Laura Kuenssberg, "Do you agree with Prime Minister that chanting globalise the intifada is racist?" Zack Polanski, "No, I don't think that is correct" "It's important we have freedom of speech and freedom of protest" "We've seen a genocide going on for years in Israel now, in which our Labour government is not just complicit but actually selling arms and intelligence" "I don't believe policing people's language is going to make Jewish safety any better in this country" Laura Kuenssberg, "But that phrase is considered by many Jews and non-Jews to inciting violence, as we were discussing with Labour's Heidi Alexander" Zack Polanski, "First, the occupation is still ongoing, these are people talking about ending the occupation" "Second, there are already laws for hate crimes against antisemitism. When people are committing a hate crime, they should be arrested for that" "I don't think we need to create new laws" "I think we should have freedom to protest in the appropriate way, that is a cornerstone of our democracy" "And that when people are protesting they make sure they are not antisemitic, and that they are very clear that they are protesting the actions of the Israeli government" Laura Kuenssberg, "Zohran Mamdani said he would discourage the use of that phrase, would you?" Zack Polanski, "It's not a phrase that I would use personally, because you can make your point a lot more effectively in other ways" "But the point is that if people are traumatised and they're really passionate about the injustices they're seeing, I don't think the conversation should be about the language people are using" "It should be about the people who are dying" Laura Kuenssberg, "Words matter" Zack Polanski, "Words matter, but the tens of thousands of Palestinians who have been murdered, the people in Lebanon who has been killed, these people matter too" "And if people want to protest that, it's important we defend their right to protest" "I'm not interested in policing people's language"

Farrukh

178,902 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад