正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Imagine Parents Sending Their Children For Studying, While Do This Shit At JNU. JNU Leftists Screaming: "Umar wala JNU" "Toh Sharjeel Wala JNU" "Jail Ke Taale Tutenge,Saare Saathi Chutenge" "Brahmanwaad Murdabad, Manuwaad Murdabad" Also These are Tax Payers Colleges. 🤡

Dear Men

9,354 subscribers

34,264 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"Dalits & Blacks play victim cards." 🚨 "Protest against caste is a victimhood." 🤡 She is JNU VC Santishree Pandit who also compared protests against Dalits like making a community (savarna) devil. Such a sick mentality. You are a Brahmin caste woman and an RSS member how can you understand the meaning of Dalit victimhood? We face slurs and mockery at every step in society. You call it a victim card? A community that has been victimized for centuries, can they not express their pain as well? A Brahmin caste woman and a RSS member, this is your "merit" that the BJP govt appointed you as Vice Chancellor. You have lived a privileged life, so you cannot understand how Dalits struggle every second of their lives in this country. We do not need your lectures on casteism, nor your sympathy. I am concerned about whether bias affects classrooms and the JNU campus, especially against Dalit students. Students who face casteism on campuses deserve fairness. People in positions of authority like you are clearly expected to be unbiased.

"Dalits & Blacks play victim cards." 🚨 "Protest against caste is a victimhood." 🤡 She is JNU VC Santishree Pandit who also compared protests against Dalits like making a community (savarna) devil. Such a sick mentality. You are a Brahmin caste woman and an RSS member how can you understand the meaning of Dalit victimhood? We face slurs and mockery at every step in society. You call it a victim card? A community that has been victimized for centuries, can they not express their pain as well? A Brahmin caste woman and a RSS member, this is your "merit" that the BJP govt appointed you as Vice Chancellor. You have lived a privileged life, so you cannot understand how Dalits struggle every second of their lives in this country. We do not need your lectures on casteism, nor your sympathy. I am concerned about whether bias affects classrooms and the JNU campus, especially against Dalit students. Students who face casteism on campuses deserve fairness. People in positions of authority like you are clearly expected to be unbiased.

Suraj Kumar Bauddh

62,080 次观看 • 5 个月前

#WATCH | Kozhikode, Kerala: Former Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) regional director KK Muhammed says, "...I had said Muslims should give up 2 more historical places and these are the temples also - Mathura which is the birthplace of Lord Krishna and Gyanvapi which is associated with Lord Shiva. So, these are the two important places which Muslims should hand over to the Hindu community for constructing magnificent Hindu temples. Because these 2 important places are as important for Hindus as Mecca and Medina are for Muslims..." "Muslims should appreciate the fact that even after giving a separate country Pakistan for the Muslim community, if India is a secular country today, it is only because of Hindu majority. Had it been a Muslim majority country, it would never have been a secular country. So, this fact also Muslims should realise and they should understand it. There should be certain gestures from their side...You should not speak about all these things with communist historians because in the earlier case also it was the communist historians like Irfan Habib and a few JNU people who had complicated the issue. Section of the Muslim community was ready to handover the Ram Janmbhoomi also because I had spoken to many people. So, we should not bring in these communist historians, they would complicate the issue and poison the minds of Muslims. Hindu leadership and Muslim leadership should come to certain terms and conditions. At the same time, what Hindus should do is that beyond these three, they should not go behind every mosque..."

#WATCH | Kozhikode, Kerala: Former Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) regional director KK Muhammed says, "...I had said Muslims should give up 2 more historical places and these are the temples also - Mathura which is the birthplace of Lord Krishna and Gyanvapi which is associated with Lord Shiva. So, these are the two important places which Muslims should hand over to the Hindu community for constructing magnificent Hindu temples. Because these 2 important places are as important for Hindus as Mecca and Medina are for Muslims..." "Muslims should appreciate the fact that even after giving a separate country Pakistan for the Muslim community, if India is a secular country today, it is only because of Hindu majority. Had it been a Muslim majority country, it would never have been a secular country. So, this fact also Muslims should realise and they should understand it. There should be certain gestures from their side...You should not speak about all these things with communist historians because in the earlier case also it was the communist historians like Irfan Habib and a few JNU people who had complicated the issue. Section of the Muslim community was ready to handover the Ram Janmbhoomi also because I had spoken to many people. So, we should not bring in these communist historians, they would complicate the issue and poison the minds of Muslims. Hindu leadership and Muslim leadership should come to certain terms and conditions. At the same time, what Hindus should do is that beyond these three, they should not go behind every mosque..."

ANI

611,343 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨Epstein Files: Elites of the Washington, London, and Brussels are DROWNING in their own FILTH The leaders of countries such as Russia🇷🇺, China🇨🇳, Venezuela🇻🇪, Iran, and others, declared as 'official enemies' by NATO nation media, did NOT appear in the Epstein Files. Elites of the US, UK, and EU, however, did appear in the Epstein Files, and the full scale of their depravity has been partially revealed for all to see. Not only do they launch illegal wars and coups, destroying the lives of millions, so that their corporations can profit in episodes of disaster capitalism... They also sadistically abuse children. While they lecture the global south on facade values of 'human rights', 'women's rights', and 'fighting corruption', these fundamentally evil elites were going off to Epstein's Island to commit unspeakable acts against children. So, what has NATO's media's reaction been, since they're hired to protect power and not question it? No Pulitzer Prizes for guessing this one...trying to find a way to connect the Epstein Files to Russia and assert that Jeffrey Epstein was actually a Russian agent. Even while the evidence is screaming in everyone's faces that Epstein had ties to Israeli intelligence, was suspected by many as running a blackmail operation for Israel's Mossad, and saw the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine as presenting many opportunities... The clowns at NATO nation media outlets have been working tirelessly to try to present an 'Epstein was a Russian agent' angle to cover up the obvious crimes of the very elites that they are wined and dined by. The only problem is, the people living in NATO countries are not as stupid and gullible as the clown stenographers masquerading as journalists and their elite handlers believe. The people now know. Many of the elites in these NATO countries are sadistic child abusers, they are continuing to read the Epstein Files to discover the economies are rigged for the wealthy elites more than they could ever imagine, and that there is no way the political classes of these countries can recover from these utterly damning revelations.

🚨Epstein Files: Elites of the Washington, London, and Brussels are DROWNING in their own FILTH The leaders of countries such as Russia🇷🇺, China🇨🇳, Venezuela🇻🇪, Iran, and others, declared as 'official enemies' by NATO nation media, did NOT appear in the Epstein Files. Elites of the US, UK, and EU, however, did appear in the Epstein Files, and the full scale of their depravity has been partially revealed for all to see. Not only do they launch illegal wars and coups, destroying the lives of millions, so that their corporations can profit in episodes of disaster capitalism... They also sadistically abuse children. While they lecture the global south on facade values of 'human rights', 'women's rights', and 'fighting corruption', these fundamentally evil elites were going off to Epstein's Island to commit unspeakable acts against children. So, what has NATO's media's reaction been, since they're hired to protect power and not question it? No Pulitzer Prizes for guessing this one...trying to find a way to connect the Epstein Files to Russia and assert that Jeffrey Epstein was actually a Russian agent. Even while the evidence is screaming in everyone's faces that Epstein had ties to Israeli intelligence, was suspected by many as running a blackmail operation for Israel's Mossad, and saw the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine as presenting many opportunities... The clowns at NATO nation media outlets have been working tirelessly to try to present an 'Epstein was a Russian agent' angle to cover up the obvious crimes of the very elites that they are wined and dined by. The only problem is, the people living in NATO countries are not as stupid and gullible as the clown stenographers masquerading as journalists and their elite handlers believe. The people now know. Many of the elites in these NATO countries are sadistic child abusers, they are continuing to read the Epstein Files to discover the economies are rigged for the wealthy elites more than they could ever imagine, and that there is no way the political classes of these countries can recover from these utterly damning revelations.

Afshin Rattansi

173,778 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨THE ONLY PANDEMIC IN THIS WORLD IS PEDOPHILIA🚨 Just wanted to clarify something for the dribbly gimps on the left who feel they have some sort of Gotcha moment when an Irish man is caught abusing children & they feel the need to tag me & others in it for not commenting on the situation🇮🇪 Unfortunately the home grown IRISH predators who target children & who we've had problems with for time & memorial on this island ARE OUR RESPONSIBILITY & that of this rotten & highly Treasonous State🇮🇪 So when you dickheads go to working class communities,Remove your silver spoons from your gammy mouths & start screaming "REFUGEES ARE WELCOME HERE" those foreign criminals that have no background checks whatsoever & who go on to Assault,Attack,Rob,Rape & murder innocent Irish people including women & children that could have easily been prevented by closed borders & employing people who do their Jobs properly THEY ARE NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY but make no mistake ALL the heinous crimes that they perpetrate(d) ON ALL YOUR HEADS BE IT including the Government,NGOs,the Police & every scumbag who has profited from this nightmare🇮🇪 We are surrounded by the most evil bastards imaginable on our own soil. They are embedded everywhere in society from the Judges chambers, Political parties to the school room & everywhere in between & beyond. But here's a wonderful idea let's bring in hundreds of thousands of unchecked animals from third world shit holes whose sick ideologies permit them to rape children. Sure what could go wrong?🇮🇪 I couldn't give any less of a fuck what Race,Nationality,Colour or Creed they are or whether they're a man or a woman for that matter. If they destroy a child's life & innocence in the most vile way known to man. Firstly they should be handed over to the victims family so that they can exact their own brand of righteous justice. Then they should be dragged by their hair through the streets,Strung up & then hanged & burned in public🇮🇪 This might actually work as a deterrent because strangely enough all the suspended sentences (Judge Nolan) or sending these deranged bastards to Arbour Hill with the rest of the nonces to be fed & watered for A few years at the expense of the tax payer just doesn't seem to be cutting it🇮🇪 THE ONLY GOOD PEDOPHILE IS A DEAD ONE. NO QUESTIONS, NO TALK, JUST DO THE WORLD A FAVOUR & GET RID BECAUSE THERE IS NO CURE FOR THAT TYPE OF EVIL & SICKNESS🇮🇪 I hope that clears everything up for the wankers who NEVER open their mouths about child rape unless it's an Irish person in the papers or on the news. This is not some point scoring competition. These are innocent babies,Precious little souls whose lives are permanently destroyed not just numbers or statistics & if you truly cared instead of slating someone whose working class accent seems to offend you more than the actual unspeakable crimes perpetrated against vulnerable children. Start putting your time to good use & CALL OUT THE MONSTERS THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE & DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY & JUSTICE🇮🇪 I won't hold my breath though seeing as how your lot have championed every satanic perversion foisted & forced upon Irish children at the callous & cruel hands of the criminals in suits & their Globalist whoremasters in Europe. Whether it be the introduction to porn for minors in the guise of 'Sex Education' or convincing & manipulating little boys & girls that they were somehow born in the wrong bodies & to mutilate & sterilise themselves. A special place in Hell awaits you all🇮🇪 When these times are studied in years to come the future generations will realise that the only ones who stood up for them & their God given Birthright were the non existent big bad 'FAR RIGHT' AKA CONCERNED PARENTS. True Irish MEN & WOMEN who saw the danger & who willingly stood Infront it no matter what🇮🇪 PROTECT CHILDHOOD INNOCENCE AT ALL COSTS. STAMP THIS EVIL OUT FOR GOOD🇮🇪 God bless🙌éiReGoBragh🇮🇪 MaryFlynnONeill LIZ CROKIN Lara Logan General Mike Flynn James English

Fergus (Ferg) Power

15,911 次观看 • 6 个月前

ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS HAPPENING: [Male asylum seeker who only just arrived working with vulnerable children alone]. In a recent parlimentary FOI repsonse, The Dept of Justice admitted that background checks are, in part, not done because someone who is a refugee or seeking asylum could be fleeing persecution perpetrated upon them by their own government. Let's be clear; state bodies such as police need to be contacted in order to ensure a criminal background check can be carried out. Long before the human trafficking lucrative contracts that The Red Cow Moran Hotel and others availed of, there were similar ways of transferring tax payers money. Public private partnerships (the state paying private and often unregulated companies) are ongoing to the greatest evils ever visited upon this land. A brainchild born from greed. It costs HSE Ireland and Tusla etc several times more to employ the use of private companies than it would cost for them to directly employ people to care for our most vulnerable. These private companies employ the cheapest labour they can find. Qualifications and background checks are not a priority compared to prioritising profit. Children, elderly, disabled and sick human beings pay the price. Furthermore, the government pays recruitment companies up to €15,000 to recruit people from afar (while Irish people leave in their droves as designed). I suspect in years to come it will "emerge" that there was an epidemic of abuse being carried out against vulnerable groups as a result of this lack of vetting. These companies also avail of the Jobs Plus scheme. This means they get between €7,500 and €10,000 of tax payers money over a two year period per person they take on, and given that asylum seekers and Refugees do not have to be on jobseekers for a period of time (up to 36 months for some Irish unemployed) it means that employers are more likely to recruit non nationals. If someone Irish (who isn't a traveller or from a one parent family) goes for a job interview against an asylum seeker who had only just arrived, then the non national person has a distinct advantage. They are more lucrative for the employer. Also, an asylum seeker or Refugee has no overheads. No rent. No mortgage. No bills. No medical costs. No food costs. So even a low paid job can yield several hundred in savings every week. Why would the government endanger our most vulnerable? Why would they also scupper their own people's chances of seeking employment? Yet then give our when Irish people are roo long on the dole (how can people even survive with the "cost of living"). The government is, in my view (looking at all the evidence) a den of iniquity. In years to come they will say "how did we get here, what lessons can be learnt". Just like they do now about past scandals they were involved in and if you sit by and say nothing then that is tacit consent for which your children will pay the ultimate price. Yes, you may be unfairly labelled racist or some other derogatory name...but really, does that matter more to you than the reality that will ensue from not objecting? Wake up Ireland, there's a blaze a burning in your home land and you're too busy worrying about name calling to feel the flames.

ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS HAPPENING: [Male asylum seeker who only just arrived working with vulnerable children alone]. In a recent parlimentary FOI repsonse, The Dept of Justice admitted that background checks are, in part, not done because someone who is a refugee or seeking asylum could be fleeing persecution perpetrated upon them by their own government. Let's be clear; state bodies such as police need to be contacted in order to ensure a criminal background check can be carried out. Long before the human trafficking lucrative contracts that The Red Cow Moran Hotel and others availed of, there were similar ways of transferring tax payers money. Public private partnerships (the state paying private and often unregulated companies) are ongoing to the greatest evils ever visited upon this land. A brainchild born from greed. It costs HSE Ireland and Tusla etc several times more to employ the use of private companies than it would cost for them to directly employ people to care for our most vulnerable. These private companies employ the cheapest labour they can find. Qualifications and background checks are not a priority compared to prioritising profit. Children, elderly, disabled and sick human beings pay the price. Furthermore, the government pays recruitment companies up to €15,000 to recruit people from afar (while Irish people leave in their droves as designed). I suspect in years to come it will "emerge" that there was an epidemic of abuse being carried out against vulnerable groups as a result of this lack of vetting. These companies also avail of the Jobs Plus scheme. This means they get between €7,500 and €10,000 of tax payers money over a two year period per person they take on, and given that asylum seekers and Refugees do not have to be on jobseekers for a period of time (up to 36 months for some Irish unemployed) it means that employers are more likely to recruit non nationals. If someone Irish (who isn't a traveller or from a one parent family) goes for a job interview against an asylum seeker who had only just arrived, then the non national person has a distinct advantage. They are more lucrative for the employer. Also, an asylum seeker or Refugee has no overheads. No rent. No mortgage. No bills. No medical costs. No food costs. So even a low paid job can yield several hundred in savings every week. Why would the government endanger our most vulnerable? Why would they also scupper their own people's chances of seeking employment? Yet then give our when Irish people are roo long on the dole (how can people even survive with the "cost of living"). The government is, in my view (looking at all the evidence) a den of iniquity. In years to come they will say "how did we get here, what lessons can be learnt". Just like they do now about past scandals they were involved in and if you sit by and say nothing then that is tacit consent for which your children will pay the ultimate price. Yes, you may be unfairly labelled racist or some other derogatory name...but really, does that matter more to you than the reality that will ensue from not objecting? Wake up Ireland, there's a blaze a burning in your home land and you're too busy worrying about name calling to feel the flames.

Susanne Delaney

15,703 次观看 • 1 年前

Well good morning Australia and Aussies fuck you Anthony Albanese . First can we do a welfare check on Senator Penny Wong the rainbow and palestinian flag Australia hating zealot has been awfully quiet since Bondi. I can’t pretend I give a shit about her feelings but since she is gleefully raping the tax payers for hundreds of thousands of dollars while hating us and selling us out she can fucking front up. Somehow in a housing crisis approximately 2500 building companies went broke last year that is NOT an accident that is a design to bring those skills into the government employ bring tradies to heel and remove the free market and under the direct control globalist socialist authoritarians. The banks, the insurance mobs , the power mobs, the telcos are all in cahoots to control Australia’s working class and keep you just doing enough to not have a revolution a la Venezuela or Iran two countries raped and pillaged with plenty of characteristics before and after shared with Australia. While all that’s going to keep us all teetering, Keir Starmer and Fat Tony Albo rampup their wars against free speech as some little memes are hurting their feelings, and as two of the most hated men (I use the term loosely) in the World. share bikini photos of these retards enthusiastically fuck em. To the silly retards that think I’m cancellable or have secrets they can expose you guys are the dumbest fucks on the planet. I don’t live on a pedestal I am a hard core libertarian who believes government has or deserves little authority I do not profess to be a “good boy, a good Christian, a well behaved statesman” I’m not and have zero desire to pretend. I will happily dismantle 80 odd percent of our government departments, if my language offends that’s on you, I don’t give a shit, if my opposition to the spineless LNP and the terrorist The Australian Greens and Australian Labor Party offends you well boo hoo I only exist in the space because they fail so spectacularly to stand up. My kids won’t be growing up under Sharia Law nor an Authoritarian police state without a fight the people who import incompatible people into Australia are enemies of Australia. People who think beheading infidels and raping women while marrying 9 year olds is ok can be deported and machete wielding third world fuckers can get on the same shark food pontoons and be deported. And not all women are built for leadership the screaming banshee delusion DEI politicians need to go and strong capable men need to step up and say we have had enough your little experiment is a failure the barbarians are at the gate and they care little for your feminist claptrap with about 50% of state and federal parliament being this DEI shit and 3/4 of the blokes in parliament being afraid to say what they really think in case some lunatic mean girl declares him a white misogynist no wonder we are being over run by people who hate this country it’s harsh but reality. One wants to ban big ute for climate change, another wants to send millions to the Phillipines to promote gay rights, another gaggle want to march for Palestine every 3 minutes while demanding we all bow and scrape to our aboriginal brothers and sisters for crimes we did not commit while rolling out white guilt education onto our kids and putting trans flags in schools to appease kids who are being told it’s ok to think you are a cat. Kiddie fiddlers get jobs in day care centres to “look after” our children while Dads who feel suss about some of these pricks are afraid to say anything in case some screaming banshee calls him homophobic. Dads and men it’s ok to follow your instincts and say like fuck my kid will be around someone you suspect is suss that’s your job fuck their feelings. Your kids safety is paramount. Kiddie fiddlers and their apologists need to be fed into woodchippers feet first. Protect our kids, protect our women , protect our farmers and businesses and save Australia

Well good morning Australia and Aussies fuck you Anthony Albanese . First can we do a welfare check on Senator Penny Wong the rainbow and palestinian flag Australia hating zealot has been awfully quiet since Bondi. I can’t pretend I give a shit about her feelings but since she is gleefully raping the tax payers for hundreds of thousands of dollars while hating us and selling us out she can fucking front up. Somehow in a housing crisis approximately 2500 building companies went broke last year that is NOT an accident that is a design to bring those skills into the government employ bring tradies to heel and remove the free market and under the direct control globalist socialist authoritarians. The banks, the insurance mobs , the power mobs, the telcos are all in cahoots to control Australia’s working class and keep you just doing enough to not have a revolution a la Venezuela or Iran two countries raped and pillaged with plenty of characteristics before and after shared with Australia. While all that’s going to keep us all teetering, Keir Starmer and Fat Tony Albo rampup their wars against free speech as some little memes are hurting their feelings, and as two of the most hated men (I use the term loosely) in the World. share bikini photos of these retards enthusiastically fuck em. To the silly retards that think I’m cancellable or have secrets they can expose you guys are the dumbest fucks on the planet. I don’t live on a pedestal I am a hard core libertarian who believes government has or deserves little authority I do not profess to be a “good boy, a good Christian, a well behaved statesman” I’m not and have zero desire to pretend. I will happily dismantle 80 odd percent of our government departments, if my language offends that’s on you, I don’t give a shit, if my opposition to the spineless LNP and the terrorist The Australian Greens and Australian Labor Party offends you well boo hoo I only exist in the space because they fail so spectacularly to stand up. My kids won’t be growing up under Sharia Law nor an Authoritarian police state without a fight the people who import incompatible people into Australia are enemies of Australia. People who think beheading infidels and raping women while marrying 9 year olds is ok can be deported and machete wielding third world fuckers can get on the same shark food pontoons and be deported. And not all women are built for leadership the screaming banshee delusion DEI politicians need to go and strong capable men need to step up and say we have had enough your little experiment is a failure the barbarians are at the gate and they care little for your feminist claptrap with about 50% of state and federal parliament being this DEI shit and 3/4 of the blokes in parliament being afraid to say what they really think in case some lunatic mean girl declares him a white misogynist no wonder we are being over run by people who hate this country it’s harsh but reality. One wants to ban big ute for climate change, another wants to send millions to the Phillipines to promote gay rights, another gaggle want to march for Palestine every 3 minutes while demanding we all bow and scrape to our aboriginal brothers and sisters for crimes we did not commit while rolling out white guilt education onto our kids and putting trans flags in schools to appease kids who are being told it’s ok to think you are a cat. Kiddie fiddlers get jobs in day care centres to “look after” our children while Dads who feel suss about some of these pricks are afraid to say anything in case some screaming banshee calls him homophobic. Dads and men it’s ok to follow your instincts and say like fuck my kid will be around someone you suspect is suss that’s your job fuck their feelings. Your kids safety is paramount. Kiddie fiddlers and their apologists need to be fed into woodchippers feet first. Protect our kids, protect our women , protect our farmers and businesses and save Australia

Dean McCrae- Freedom Chef

72,474 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨ALERT TEXAS PARENTS DO YOU KNOW THE ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION THAT PENETRATED YOUR CHILDREN’S PUBLIC SCHOOLS? It’s WHYISLAM - the dawah arm of ICNA, directly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood network exposed in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. This is the exact group that stormed Wylie East High School with an unauthorized booth: free Qurans, hijabs on non-Muslim girls, and “Understanding Sharia” pamphlets - while Principal Tiffany Doolan tried on Hijabs and punished MARCO, the BRAVE student who blew the whistle. Listen to WHYISLAM's own national leader, Imam Jawad Ahmed, openly bragging about ISLAM taking over America just weeks ago: “We chose the first Muslim mayor of New York City, and Inshallah, rightly so, we will choose the next Governor of New York as a Muslim and the next Governor of any state as a Muslim. And we’re not going to stop there. 30,000 is nothing… There are seven to 8 million Muslims in America. Imagine if 1 million Muslims converge… We have to think bigger dream, bigger vision… Let’s have a 1 million convention. You will raise the eyebrows of people of every gender and every ethnicity… They say, ‘Oh, these Muslims are here, and they are someone to reckon with.’” This isn’t outreach. This is a blueprint for political conquest - and they’re using your kids’ school cafeteria as the testing ground while building Sharia enclaves and voucher-funded Islamic schools with your tax dollars. 15-year-old Marco Hunter-Lopez gets death threats and censored. 12-year-old Leland Saunders is already testifying at board meetings, standing up Marco against the march of Islam in their public schools! These kids are fighting for the future. ENOUGH. REMOVE every WhyIslam and MSA operation from Texas schools NOW. FIRE Principal Tiffany Doolan for enabling the infiltration and crushing of conservative students. Marco and Leland are already on the front lines. Will you stand with them or hand your children to the Muslim Brotherhood? Remove WhyIslam. Boot the MSA. Fire the collaborators. Reclaim our schools or lose America. SEE THE FULL REPORT AND VIDEO:

🚨ALERT TEXAS PARENTS DO YOU KNOW THE ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION THAT PENETRATED YOUR CHILDREN’S PUBLIC SCHOOLS? It’s WHYISLAM - the dawah arm of ICNA, directly tied to the Muslim Brotherhood network exposed in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. This is the exact group that stormed Wylie East High School with an unauthorized booth: free Qurans, hijabs on non-Muslim girls, and “Understanding Sharia” pamphlets - while Principal Tiffany Doolan tried on Hijabs and punished MARCO, the BRAVE student who blew the whistle. Listen to WHYISLAM's own national leader, Imam Jawad Ahmed, openly bragging about ISLAM taking over America just weeks ago: “We chose the first Muslim mayor of New York City, and Inshallah, rightly so, we will choose the next Governor of New York as a Muslim and the next Governor of any state as a Muslim. And we’re not going to stop there. 30,000 is nothing… There are seven to 8 million Muslims in America. Imagine if 1 million Muslims converge… We have to think bigger dream, bigger vision… Let’s have a 1 million convention. You will raise the eyebrows of people of every gender and every ethnicity… They say, ‘Oh, these Muslims are here, and they are someone to reckon with.’” This isn’t outreach. This is a blueprint for political conquest - and they’re using your kids’ school cafeteria as the testing ground while building Sharia enclaves and voucher-funded Islamic schools with your tax dollars. 15-year-old Marco Hunter-Lopez gets death threats and censored. 12-year-old Leland Saunders is already testifying at board meetings, standing up Marco against the march of Islam in their public schools! These kids are fighting for the future. ENOUGH. REMOVE every WhyIslam and MSA operation from Texas schools NOW. FIRE Principal Tiffany Doolan for enabling the infiltration and crushing of conservative students. Marco and Leland are already on the front lines. Will you stand with them or hand your children to the Muslim Brotherhood? Remove WhyIslam. Boot the MSA. Fire the collaborators. Reclaim our schools or lose America. SEE THE FULL REPORT AND VIDEO:

Amy Mek

183,357 次观看 • 3 个月前

This video posted by Gayton McKenzie, the Sports Minister of South Africa, is important for us as Africans, although the lesson I take from it is different from the one he intended. But thanks to him for sharing it, because it touches on something fundamental that many of our leaders still do not understand. I have said for decades in Zimbabwe that it was political foolishness not to make Ndebele and Shona compulsory in all schools. Not because one group must be elevated over another, but because language expands the mind. My mother taught me two things about language when I was growing up; the more languages you speak, the more your mind opens, and language is business. This is why the Chinese learn Zulu, Xhosa, Afrikaans, and other African languages. They do not feel “undermined” by it. They know exactly what they are doing. They are opening markets and embedding themselves where opportunities lie. It is called strategic intelligence. It is unbelievable that for 45 years Zimbabwean political leaders have refused to make Ndebele compulsory. I have always argued that Ndebele is not just a cultural language, it is a business language. Our biggest trading partner is South Africa. They speak Zulu, which is closely related to Ndebele. If you speak Ndebele and you arrive in Johannesburg, Durban or Cape Town, you are immediately at home. You understand them, they understand you. Business becomes easier. When you speak a person’s language, you speak to their heart. That is what Nelson Mandela meant. And if you look at everyday life, Shona-speaking traders travel to South Africa more than they travel anywhere else. Yet they cannot speak the language that dominates that market but is spoken in their country. That is an economic loss created by political short-sightedness. The Chinese are not learning African languages for fun. They learn them to do business and, yes, even for espionage. Meanwhile, some Zimbabwean politicians discourage their own people from learning languages that would empower them, while their own children are fluent in French, English, Portuguese, and Mandarin. Across Africa, the most widely used languages outside vernacular ones are English, French, and Portuguese, with Spanish in Equatorial Guinea. Yet you still hear politicians calling French “neocolonial” if ordinary children are taught it, while their own children attend French schools, hold foreign passports, and work in international institutions. Look at Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government. Several senior officials hold American, British, Australian, or European passports. Nick Mangwana is a British citizen, yet he insults Zimbabweans who take up British citizenship. That level of hypocrisy tells you everything. Serious countries invest in language. Britain and America have entire divisions staffed by people who specialise in Mandarin and Arabic. These are the most sought-after languages in global intelligence and diplomacy. They do this for national self-interest. We should do the same. When I was studying Film at Brunel University in England, I tried to enrol in a Mandarin course. I could not get in. The moment the registration link went live, every place was taken. The British understand the value of language. That is why if you visit China today, you will find Chinese people who speak Shona. They study us more seriously than we study ourselves. It breaks my heart that 45 years after independence, Zimbabwean leaders still do not understand the importance of teaching Ndebele compulsorily. Someone will ask, what about Shangani? But the point I am making is simple, Ndebele is economically strategic for Zimbabwe. It is the bridge language to our biggest market. When you speak Zulu in South Africa, even Xhosa speakers will understand you. It is a regional business language, and every Zimbabwean should know it. I am 54 years old. It is too late for me. But young Zimbabweans must be given this advantage. Languages also reduce political toxicity. I speak Zezuru, chiManyika, and Karanga because I went to school in the Midlands and I am Barwe. I can switch between them easily. It dismantles ethnic suspicion. If I had learned Ndebele, it would have enriched my life even more, especially now that I partly live in South Africa. Now coming to international languages. If French were made compulsory in Zimbabwean schools, job and business opportunities for our children would double instantly. Half of Africa speaks French. We speak English, but we do not speak French. That puts us at a disadvantage. If you go to the DRC or Congo-Brazzaville or Côte d’Ivoire or Senegal, French opens doors. With French, you do business without interpreters. Countries with intelligent leadership understand this. Look at Rwanda. Today they are bilingual in international languages. If you speak English, they respond in English. If you speak French, they respond in French. That is leadership. Not this village thinking that learning another language “undermines culture”. If we were serious about Pan-Africanism, I should be able to go to Algeria and work there because I speak French. An Algerian should be able to work in Zimbabwe because they speak English. That is how continental integration works. If we had serious thinkers at the African Union instead of political actors, Africa would be far ahead. Africa is the richest continent in the world in minerals, yet we remain poor because of leaders who cannot grasp basic developmental logic. It breaks my heart to see Zimbabweans miss opportunities simply because they do not speak French or Ndebele. They lose jobs, lose contracts, lose global relevance. Meanwhile, the elites’ children speak these languages fluently and work at the United Nations. When you apply for a UN job, the first question from Zimbabwe is often, “Do you speak French?” It immediately puts you ahead of others if the answer is yes. I pray that one day Zimbabwe will have leadership that understands these simple, basic, yet transformative principles. Because language is not politics. Language is power. Language is economics. Language is opportunity. Language is the future. Now, some will argue that those who want to speak Ndebele should simply learn it on their own. But that is not how any serious society operates if it wants genuine transformation. Languages are taught institutionally, through schools, not left to chance or to individual families. Before children learn about Picasso or the Renaissance, they should be grounded in languages that will shape their economic, social, and intellectual futures. If you leave it to parents, you immediately create inequality. What happens to a child whose parents are poor, who cannot afford private lessons, or who do not understand the long-term economic value of languages? That child is left behind through no fault of their own. This is exactly why government exists, to intervene where inequality would otherwise reproduce itself, and to make sure that opportunities are structured, not accidental. When languages are taught at school, they become institutional, accessible, and universal. They stop being optional and become part of a national developmental strategy. That is how you build a society that transforms itself economically, intellectually, and socially. That is how you open the minds of citizens and give every child, rich or poor, a genuine chance to compete in the region, on the continent, and in the world.

This video posted by Gayton McKenzie, the Sports Minister of South Africa, is important for us as Africans, although the lesson I take from it is different from the one he intended. But thanks to him for sharing it, because it touches on something fundamental that many of our leaders still do not understand. I have said for decades in Zimbabwe that it was political foolishness not to make Ndebele and Shona compulsory in all schools. Not because one group must be elevated over another, but because language expands the mind. My mother taught me two things about language when I was growing up; the more languages you speak, the more your mind opens, and language is business. This is why the Chinese learn Zulu, Xhosa, Afrikaans, and other African languages. They do not feel “undermined” by it. They know exactly what they are doing. They are opening markets and embedding themselves where opportunities lie. It is called strategic intelligence. It is unbelievable that for 45 years Zimbabwean political leaders have refused to make Ndebele compulsory. I have always argued that Ndebele is not just a cultural language, it is a business language. Our biggest trading partner is South Africa. They speak Zulu, which is closely related to Ndebele. If you speak Ndebele and you arrive in Johannesburg, Durban or Cape Town, you are immediately at home. You understand them, they understand you. Business becomes easier. When you speak a person’s language, you speak to their heart. That is what Nelson Mandela meant. And if you look at everyday life, Shona-speaking traders travel to South Africa more than they travel anywhere else. Yet they cannot speak the language that dominates that market but is spoken in their country. That is an economic loss created by political short-sightedness. The Chinese are not learning African languages for fun. They learn them to do business and, yes, even for espionage. Meanwhile, some Zimbabwean politicians discourage their own people from learning languages that would empower them, while their own children are fluent in French, English, Portuguese, and Mandarin. Across Africa, the most widely used languages outside vernacular ones are English, French, and Portuguese, with Spanish in Equatorial Guinea. Yet you still hear politicians calling French “neocolonial” if ordinary children are taught it, while their own children attend French schools, hold foreign passports, and work in international institutions. Look at Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government. Several senior officials hold American, British, Australian, or European passports. Nick Mangwana is a British citizen, yet he insults Zimbabweans who take up British citizenship. That level of hypocrisy tells you everything. Serious countries invest in language. Britain and America have entire divisions staffed by people who specialise in Mandarin and Arabic. These are the most sought-after languages in global intelligence and diplomacy. They do this for national self-interest. We should do the same. When I was studying Film at Brunel University in England, I tried to enrol in a Mandarin course. I could not get in. The moment the registration link went live, every place was taken. The British understand the value of language. That is why if you visit China today, you will find Chinese people who speak Shona. They study us more seriously than we study ourselves. It breaks my heart that 45 years after independence, Zimbabwean leaders still do not understand the importance of teaching Ndebele compulsorily. Someone will ask, what about Shangani? But the point I am making is simple, Ndebele is economically strategic for Zimbabwe. It is the bridge language to our biggest market. When you speak Zulu in South Africa, even Xhosa speakers will understand you. It is a regional business language, and every Zimbabwean should know it. I am 54 years old. It is too late for me. But young Zimbabweans must be given this advantage. Languages also reduce political toxicity. I speak Zezuru, chiManyika, and Karanga because I went to school in the Midlands and I am Barwe. I can switch between them easily. It dismantles ethnic suspicion. If I had learned Ndebele, it would have enriched my life even more, especially now that I partly live in South Africa. Now coming to international languages. If French were made compulsory in Zimbabwean schools, job and business opportunities for our children would double instantly. Half of Africa speaks French. We speak English, but we do not speak French. That puts us at a disadvantage. If you go to the DRC or Congo-Brazzaville or Côte d’Ivoire or Senegal, French opens doors. With French, you do business without interpreters. Countries with intelligent leadership understand this. Look at Rwanda. Today they are bilingual in international languages. If you speak English, they respond in English. If you speak French, they respond in French. That is leadership. Not this village thinking that learning another language “undermines culture”. If we were serious about Pan-Africanism, I should be able to go to Algeria and work there because I speak French. An Algerian should be able to work in Zimbabwe because they speak English. That is how continental integration works. If we had serious thinkers at the African Union instead of political actors, Africa would be far ahead. Africa is the richest continent in the world in minerals, yet we remain poor because of leaders who cannot grasp basic developmental logic. It breaks my heart to see Zimbabweans miss opportunities simply because they do not speak French or Ndebele. They lose jobs, lose contracts, lose global relevance. Meanwhile, the elites’ children speak these languages fluently and work at the United Nations. When you apply for a UN job, the first question from Zimbabwe is often, “Do you speak French?” It immediately puts you ahead of others if the answer is yes. I pray that one day Zimbabwe will have leadership that understands these simple, basic, yet transformative principles. Because language is not politics. Language is power. Language is economics. Language is opportunity. Language is the future. Now, some will argue that those who want to speak Ndebele should simply learn it on their own. But that is not how any serious society operates if it wants genuine transformation. Languages are taught institutionally, through schools, not left to chance or to individual families. Before children learn about Picasso or the Renaissance, they should be grounded in languages that will shape their economic, social, and intellectual futures. If you leave it to parents, you immediately create inequality. What happens to a child whose parents are poor, who cannot afford private lessons, or who do not understand the long-term economic value of languages? That child is left behind through no fault of their own. This is exactly why government exists, to intervene where inequality would otherwise reproduce itself, and to make sure that opportunities are structured, not accidental. When languages are taught at school, they become institutional, accessible, and universal. They stop being optional and become part of a national developmental strategy. That is how you build a society that transforms itself economically, intellectually, and socially. That is how you open the minds of citizens and give every child, rich or poor, a genuine chance to compete in the region, on the continent, and in the world.

Hopewell Chin’ono

133,497 次观看 • 8 个月前

Hope Not Hate is a far left activist group that works with the Labour Party and British intelligence services to smear Labour’s opponents (and anyone to the right of Stalin) as “far right”. One of its senior staff members, Liron Velleman, was sentenced last week for child sex offences. (The others have not yet been caught). As well as being part of Hope Not Hate, Liron was also a Labour Party politician. I mean you can’t say the warning signs weren’t there. The only thing he’s missing from the full paedophile CV is being a BBC presenter. Despite being a demonstrable danger to children, Liron Velleman wasn’t given a jail sentence; his sentence was suspended, so he walked free from the court (he was spotted in the pub afterwards having a celebratory drink with his parents). This is an unusually lenient sentence for such crimes. I have so many questions. > Hope Not Hate specialise in online monitoring - they monitored my online presence, until they realised I’d hit puberty. Did Liron use the techniques and equipment provided to him by Hope Not Hate to commit his crimes? > Why is an organisation that’s so blatantly a political smear campaign group run by the Labour Party able to present itself as a non-partisan “anti fascist” organisation? > Why does an organisation that positions itself as a moral arbiter have so many sex offenders and violent criminals on its books? Other Hope Not Hate staff members have admitted to crimes such as attacking women with hammers. > Why is taxpayers’ money given to this shower of shite? But I’m going to look at why so many left-wing activists are paedophiles. Remember when Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself during a Black Lives Matter riot and shot three random left-wing rioters who were attacking him? It turned out that one of them was a convicted paedophile and another one was convicted of violence against women. Why were two out of three of the left-wing activists, the purest of the pure, who call themselves Antifa fighting against the scourge of “fascism”, objectively terrible people? THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST DEVIANCE There’s a psychological term “moral licensing”, where people who think that they’re doing good feel that their virtuosity gives them some sort of credit, a deposit of good karma, that then entitles them to do something bad later, as if the universe owes them. Similarly, psychologists use the term “moral cleansing”, the psychological tendency of people to engage in good deeds to restore their moral self-worth after committing an immoral act or correct some malevolent fault. So paedophiles like Liron Velleman think that working for Hope Not Hate will offset their crimes. By doing what they perceive as “good” or presenting themselves as virtuous, they will reset the balance, or build up credits they can spend noncing kids. It goes deeper than that. The essence of leftism is to prioritise the communal above individual rights, so nobody has autonomy over their bodies. We use our bodies to work, to earn money. Leftists don’t believe that the individual should own the fruits of their labour. They think that this effort, anything produced by it, is the property of the state. Extreme leftists see themselves as emblems of the state, so feel entitled to take this for themselves, whether that’s as money, as slavery (as we see under communist regimes) or, at the extreme end, as child abuse. Look how unconcerned leftists are about paedophilia, how they talk about grooming gangs. They excuse the crimes and accuse anyone who campaigns on behalf of the girls of being “grifters” because nobody on the left can even envisage that somebody might authentically be repulsed by these crimes. They think that the only possible motivation is financial. And we should remember that left-wing people are all spiteful communist mutants motivated by envy and hatred and are disgustingly ugly. Look at the boss of Hope Not Hate, Nick Lowles, who employs paedophiles, communists, men who attack women. As Wittgenstein said, morality and aesthetics are the same. PAEDOPHILES SEEK ESTABLISHMENT POWER And we also need to look at why Liron Velleman got such a lenient sentence. We know that the establishment is biased towards itself, and Liron was part of the establishment. Paedophiles - such as Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris and those in the church - tend to move themselves close to power and authority to give themselves the opportunity to commit their crimes, and also the influence to cover those crimes up. Liron Velleman was so embedded in the establishment that he even helped draft the government’s Online Safety Bill, a piece of legislation aimed at keeping children safe on the internet. This is like Jeffrey Epstein drafting a babysitting bill. If you want to keep children safe online, you’d statistically have a higher impact if you locked up everyone who helped draft the Online Safety Bill. While sentencing, Liron’s judge even said that a mitigating factor was that he was a Labour councillor? How is that a mitigating factor? That’s a big red flag right there, and that red flag has a hammer and sickle on it. Look how entitled Liron felt to protection from the establishment. After his trial, he went for a celebratory drink with his parents in a local pub. Someone spotted him and confronted him. Liron’s party immediately called the police on the man filming adults in a public place. They know the police will take this very seriously. That’s exactly what the police are there for. Not for protecting children in Rotherham, but for protecting an establishment nonce being spoken to in public. Look at the bizarrely, incongruously harsh sentences handed down to people on the right, such as Sam Melia, who was jailed printing and distributing stickers that said such awful things as “It’s OK to be white”. And Lucy Connolly, who tweeted then deleted her indifference to hotels containing migrants being burnt down “for all I care”. This insane focus on the supposed “far-right” doesn’t make sense. I’d feel much more comfortable leaving my children in the care of an average far-right bigot than the average far-left activist. I think we need to recalibrate our morality.

Hope Not Hate is a far left activist group that works with the Labour Party and British intelligence services to smear Labour’s opponents (and anyone to the right of Stalin) as “far right”. One of its senior staff members, Liron Velleman, was sentenced last week for child sex offences. (The others have not yet been caught). As well as being part of Hope Not Hate, Liron was also a Labour Party politician. I mean you can’t say the warning signs weren’t there. The only thing he’s missing from the full paedophile CV is being a BBC presenter. Despite being a demonstrable danger to children, Liron Velleman wasn’t given a jail sentence; his sentence was suspended, so he walked free from the court (he was spotted in the pub afterwards having a celebratory drink with his parents). This is an unusually lenient sentence for such crimes. I have so many questions. > Hope Not Hate specialise in online monitoring - they monitored my online presence, until they realised I’d hit puberty. Did Liron use the techniques and equipment provided to him by Hope Not Hate to commit his crimes? > Why is an organisation that’s so blatantly a political smear campaign group run by the Labour Party able to present itself as a non-partisan “anti fascist” organisation? > Why does an organisation that positions itself as a moral arbiter have so many sex offenders and violent criminals on its books? Other Hope Not Hate staff members have admitted to crimes such as attacking women with hammers. > Why is taxpayers’ money given to this shower of shite? But I’m going to look at why so many left-wing activists are paedophiles. Remember when Kyle Rittenhouse defended himself during a Black Lives Matter riot and shot three random left-wing rioters who were attacking him? It turned out that one of them was a convicted paedophile and another one was convicted of violence against women. Why were two out of three of the left-wing activists, the purest of the pure, who call themselves Antifa fighting against the scourge of “fascism”, objectively terrible people? THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND LEFTIST DEVIANCE There’s a psychological term “moral licensing”, where people who think that they’re doing good feel that their virtuosity gives them some sort of credit, a deposit of good karma, that then entitles them to do something bad later, as if the universe owes them. Similarly, psychologists use the term “moral cleansing”, the psychological tendency of people to engage in good deeds to restore their moral self-worth after committing an immoral act or correct some malevolent fault. So paedophiles like Liron Velleman think that working for Hope Not Hate will offset their crimes. By doing what they perceive as “good” or presenting themselves as virtuous, they will reset the balance, or build up credits they can spend noncing kids. It goes deeper than that. The essence of leftism is to prioritise the communal above individual rights, so nobody has autonomy over their bodies. We use our bodies to work, to earn money. Leftists don’t believe that the individual should own the fruits of their labour. They think that this effort, anything produced by it, is the property of the state. Extreme leftists see themselves as emblems of the state, so feel entitled to take this for themselves, whether that’s as money, as slavery (as we see under communist regimes) or, at the extreme end, as child abuse. Look how unconcerned leftists are about paedophilia, how they talk about grooming gangs. They excuse the crimes and accuse anyone who campaigns on behalf of the girls of being “grifters” because nobody on the left can even envisage that somebody might authentically be repulsed by these crimes. They think that the only possible motivation is financial. And we should remember that left-wing people are all spiteful communist mutants motivated by envy and hatred and are disgustingly ugly. Look at the boss of Hope Not Hate, Nick Lowles, who employs paedophiles, communists, men who attack women. As Wittgenstein said, morality and aesthetics are the same. PAEDOPHILES SEEK ESTABLISHMENT POWER And we also need to look at why Liron Velleman got such a lenient sentence. We know that the establishment is biased towards itself, and Liron was part of the establishment. Paedophiles - such as Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris and those in the church - tend to move themselves close to power and authority to give themselves the opportunity to commit their crimes, and also the influence to cover those crimes up. Liron Velleman was so embedded in the establishment that he even helped draft the government’s Online Safety Bill, a piece of legislation aimed at keeping children safe on the internet. This is like Jeffrey Epstein drafting a babysitting bill. If you want to keep children safe online, you’d statistically have a higher impact if you locked up everyone who helped draft the Online Safety Bill. While sentencing, Liron’s judge even said that a mitigating factor was that he was a Labour councillor? How is that a mitigating factor? That’s a big red flag right there, and that red flag has a hammer and sickle on it. Look how entitled Liron felt to protection from the establishment. After his trial, he went for a celebratory drink with his parents in a local pub. Someone spotted him and confronted him. Liron’s party immediately called the police on the man filming adults in a public place. They know the police will take this very seriously. That’s exactly what the police are there for. Not for protecting children in Rotherham, but for protecting an establishment nonce being spoken to in public. Look at the bizarrely, incongruously harsh sentences handed down to people on the right, such as Sam Melia, who was jailed printing and distributing stickers that said such awful things as “It’s OK to be white”. And Lucy Connolly, who tweeted then deleted her indifference to hotels containing migrants being burnt down “for all I care”. This insane focus on the supposed “far-right” doesn’t make sense. I’d feel much more comfortable leaving my children in the care of an average far-right bigot than the average far-left activist. I think we need to recalibrate our morality.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

71,329 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼️ Mobile isn't San Francisco. Pastor Travis Johnson — For immediate release Statement from Pastor Travis Johnson, Lead Pastor, Pathway Church - Mobile, Alabama Mobile isn't San Francisco. I said those words on the Jeff Poor Show when asked about "National Pride Month" banners hanging on city light poles in downtown Mobile. People heard it. Some cheered. Some objected. But nobody asked me what I was going to do about it. Here's what I did. The City of Mobile operates a Banner Program through its Parks & Recreation Department. It allows organizations to rent designated streetlight poles: poles built, owned, and maintained by Mobile taxpayers to display banners promoting public events and observances. City officials have stated publicly that the program is viewpoint-neutral, as required by the First Amendment. A private person or organization recently used that program to hang "National Pride Month" banners on Water Street. The city approved the application and installed the banners on public infrastructure. I serve on the Visit Mobile board, the city's lodging-tax-funded tourism bureau, which also promotes these events on its publicly-supported website and I raised my concerns there as well. But I didn't stop at objecting. I acted. Using the exact same program, following the exact same process, I submitted my own banner application. It reads: National Child Awareness Month — Protect Our Children from Gender Ideology. The design has been received. I have been told it is going to be honored. I am calling on the City of Mobile to honor my duly submitted banner application. It was made in good faith, through the proper process, under the same policy that approved the Pride Month banners. There is no legal, procedural, or policy basis to treat it differently. I understand that following my banner, this policy may be ending. That's perfect. If that’s the case, let it be said that what ended gender indoctrination banners being affixed to our city property was a call to prayer, a banner asking God to protect the children of Mobile from gender ideology. A pastor submitted a prayer for our children, and the city decided it could no longer allow extremist indoctrination campaigns on public poles. That is not a loss. That is a victory for every family in this city. I will take that outcome every single day of the week. But there is a deeper issue here that goes beyond banners and policies. It is the question of who is actually at the table when decisions like this get made, not just at the City of Mobile, but at Mobile County and every board, bureau, and commission that makes decisions in the name of the people of this community. Visit Mobile and boards like it should be filled with people who look like Mobile. Not just in terms of race or background but, in terms of who this city actually is at its core. Where are the steel workers? Where are the mama bears who are fighting every single day to protect their kids from an agenda they never asked for? Where are the Little League dads coaching third base on a Saturday morning? Where is the praying grandmother, the one whose intercession and quiet encouragement have sustained this community through every hard season it has ever faced? They aren't there because more of them need to be appointed by the City of Mobile, by Mobile County, and by every appointing authority that shapes the direction of this community. The voice for the health of the nuclear family is radically underrepresented on the Visit Mobile board and on boards like it across this city and this county. It produces exactly the kind of decisions we are now debating, decisions made in the name of a community that was never actually consulted. And if the mama bears and Little League dads aren’t in the room and don't have a seat at the table, it's because they’re on the menu. 1819 News Alabama Politics #alpolitics FlashPoint Army FOX10News | WALA NBC 15 News WKRG

‼️ Mobile isn't San Francisco. Pastor Travis Johnson — For immediate release Statement from Pastor Travis Johnson, Lead Pastor, Pathway Church - Mobile, Alabama Mobile isn't San Francisco. I said those words on the Jeff Poor Show when asked about "National Pride Month" banners hanging on city light poles in downtown Mobile. People heard it. Some cheered. Some objected. But nobody asked me what I was going to do about it. Here's what I did. The City of Mobile operates a Banner Program through its Parks & Recreation Department. It allows organizations to rent designated streetlight poles: poles built, owned, and maintained by Mobile taxpayers to display banners promoting public events and observances. City officials have stated publicly that the program is viewpoint-neutral, as required by the First Amendment. A private person or organization recently used that program to hang "National Pride Month" banners on Water Street. The city approved the application and installed the banners on public infrastructure. I serve on the Visit Mobile board, the city's lodging-tax-funded tourism bureau, which also promotes these events on its publicly-supported website and I raised my concerns there as well. But I didn't stop at objecting. I acted. Using the exact same program, following the exact same process, I submitted my own banner application. It reads: National Child Awareness Month — Protect Our Children from Gender Ideology. The design has been received. I have been told it is going to be honored. I am calling on the City of Mobile to honor my duly submitted banner application. It was made in good faith, through the proper process, under the same policy that approved the Pride Month banners. There is no legal, procedural, or policy basis to treat it differently. I understand that following my banner, this policy may be ending. That's perfect. If that’s the case, let it be said that what ended gender indoctrination banners being affixed to our city property was a call to prayer, a banner asking God to protect the children of Mobile from gender ideology. A pastor submitted a prayer for our children, and the city decided it could no longer allow extremist indoctrination campaigns on public poles. That is not a loss. That is a victory for every family in this city. I will take that outcome every single day of the week. But there is a deeper issue here that goes beyond banners and policies. It is the question of who is actually at the table when decisions like this get made, not just at the City of Mobile, but at Mobile County and every board, bureau, and commission that makes decisions in the name of the people of this community. Visit Mobile and boards like it should be filled with people who look like Mobile. Not just in terms of race or background but, in terms of who this city actually is at its core. Where are the steel workers? Where are the mama bears who are fighting every single day to protect their kids from an agenda they never asked for? Where are the Little League dads coaching third base on a Saturday morning? Where is the praying grandmother, the one whose intercession and quiet encouragement have sustained this community through every hard season it has ever faced? They aren't there because more of them need to be appointed by the City of Mobile, by Mobile County, and by every appointing authority that shapes the direction of this community. The voice for the health of the nuclear family is radically underrepresented on the Visit Mobile board and on boards like it across this city and this county. It produces exactly the kind of decisions we are now debating, decisions made in the name of a community that was never actually consulted. And if the mama bears and Little League dads aren’t in the room and don't have a seat at the table, it's because they’re on the menu. 1819 News Alabama Politics #alpolitics FlashPoint Army FOX10News | WALA NBC 15 News WKRG

Pastor Travis Johnson

10,819 次观看 • 2 个月前

I Write About Israel All The Time Because I Have To, Not Because I Want To So Israel held a bunch of Palestinians in concentration camps without charge just for being Palestinian, and then they not only starved and tortured them but actually made them wear a Star of David on their prison garments. But remember kids, it’s evil and wrong to compare Israel to Nazi Germany — no matter how cartoonishly blatant they make the similarities. ❖ According to an Israeli media report, last May IDF troops strapped explosives to the neck of an 80 year-old Palestinian man in Gaza and used him as a human shield for hours. They then shot and killed him and his wife. When the Gaza holocaust first started I used to read headlines like this and go “Holy shit that must be an exaggeration,” and then I’d read up on it and go “Fuck, nope, that’s exactly what happened.” Now I read them and sigh and just sort of wilt inside. ❖ On Saturday night an Israeli national shot two other Israelis in Miami because he mistook them for Palestinians. The phenomenon of Israelis shooting Israelis who appear Arab has spread to the United States. The only way to be safe from friendly fire as an Israeli is to be the white-skinned kind of Israeli whose family comes from Europe. ❖ People who are medically evacuated from Gaza are reportedly being forced to sign paperwork at exiting checkpoints saying they cannot return to the enclave. This revelation comes shortly after Doctors Without Borders informed us that Israeli forces have been entering hospitals in Gaza and methodically destroying all the medical equipment inside them. This is a cold, calculated move to facilitate the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. ❖ Someone accused me of being “obsessed with Israel” yesterday and it just blew my mind. Civil rights are being destroyed throughout the west to defend a state that’s committing genocide and ethnic cleansing with western backing, and we’re not meant to talk about that state and the things it’s doing? Huh? I mean, do people think I like writing about this sleazy apartheid state all the time? Does it look like I enjoy it? Do you think it’s been fun having to look at videos of children with their guts ripped out by western-supplied weapons and getting called a Nazi when I say it’s wrong? Yeah man that shit’s like crack to me. I’m obsessed with it. I’m not “obsessed” with Israel. I hate writing about Israel. I wish I never had to think about it. Israel just happens to be the focal point of the worst things that are happening in the world right now, all with the backing of the western empire I live under. I can’t just not talk about this; if I didn’t I’d be a shitty person. This is obvious to anyone with a working mind and a healthy heart. ❖ Israel apologists conflate all Jews with the actions of the state of Israel. They will deny that they do this, but they indisputably do. That is the message they are circulating when they accuse anyone who criticizes Israel’s actions of hating all Jews. They create antisemitism. ❖ Trump says he wants to mutually denuclearize with Russia and China and negotiate a mutual 50 percent cut to the military budget of all three nations. These would both be wonderful new developments. And, I’ll believe it when I see it. As always, ignore their words. Watch their actions. ❖ I’m harder on people who get close to the truth and then swerve than I am on people who are just completely asleep. Anarchists who wind up supporting NATO. Conspiracy analysts who wind up supporting Trump. Socialists who wind up supporting Democrats. These half-awake sleepwalkers annoy me in ways the average fully asleep member of the public does not, because they’re forming their dopey worldviews based on a lot more information. I wouldn’t be mad at a blind person for knocking over my things, but someone who has one working eye and stumbles around wearing two eyepatches is just being a douchebag. They’re like a man who pulled his head out of his ass, looked around, and then knowingly re-inserted it. ❖ Someone recently tried to tell me that the “jury is still out” on Trump’s actions regarding Israel, because maybe he’ll wind up being not so bad on the issue. This is nonsense. The jury isn’t out on Trump regarding Israel. He’s sending Israel weapons while it’s murdering people in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon. These are not things Trump might do. These are not things Trump is saying he will do. These are things Trump is doing. Presently. Even if you choose to believe his ethnic cleansing plans for Gaza are actually brilliant 9-D chess maneuvers secretly designed to free Palestine and achieve peace (and they absolutely are not), you have to ignore hard material actions you are seeing right now right in front of your face in order to believe the jury is still out. You also have to ignore the fact that Trump has publicly admitted to being bought and controlled by the Adelsons. There are arguments to be made that in terms of hard material facts on the ground so far Trump was the lesser evil on Israel, but there are no arguments to be made that he isn’t still very evil. The jury is not out on that. The jury is very much in. And it doesn’t actually matter if Trump winds up being less destructive than Biden on Palestine. The election has been over for months. Trump is the president now. Biden is completely irrelevant. There is no excuse for defending the depraved actions of the president of the world’s most powerful and destructive nation. The experience of talking to Trump supporters about Trump’s Israel sycophancy is identical to the experience of talking to Biden supporters about Biden’s Israel sycophancy. It’s exactly the same. These partisan livestock will make excuses for literally anything. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley.

I Write About Israel All The Time Because I Have To, Not Because I Want To So Israel held a bunch of Palestinians in concentration camps without charge just for being Palestinian, and then they not only starved and tortured them but actually made them wear a Star of David on their prison garments. But remember kids, it’s evil and wrong to compare Israel to Nazi Germany — no matter how cartoonishly blatant they make the similarities. ❖ According to an Israeli media report, last May IDF troops strapped explosives to the neck of an 80 year-old Palestinian man in Gaza and used him as a human shield for hours. They then shot and killed him and his wife. When the Gaza holocaust first started I used to read headlines like this and go “Holy shit that must be an exaggeration,” and then I’d read up on it and go “Fuck, nope, that’s exactly what happened.” Now I read them and sigh and just sort of wilt inside. ❖ On Saturday night an Israeli national shot two other Israelis in Miami because he mistook them for Palestinians. The phenomenon of Israelis shooting Israelis who appear Arab has spread to the United States. The only way to be safe from friendly fire as an Israeli is to be the white-skinned kind of Israeli whose family comes from Europe. ❖ People who are medically evacuated from Gaza are reportedly being forced to sign paperwork at exiting checkpoints saying they cannot return to the enclave. This revelation comes shortly after Doctors Without Borders informed us that Israeli forces have been entering hospitals in Gaza and methodically destroying all the medical equipment inside them. This is a cold, calculated move to facilitate the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. ❖ Someone accused me of being “obsessed with Israel” yesterday and it just blew my mind. Civil rights are being destroyed throughout the west to defend a state that’s committing genocide and ethnic cleansing with western backing, and we’re not meant to talk about that state and the things it’s doing? Huh? I mean, do people think I like writing about this sleazy apartheid state all the time? Does it look like I enjoy it? Do you think it’s been fun having to look at videos of children with their guts ripped out by western-supplied weapons and getting called a Nazi when I say it’s wrong? Yeah man that shit’s like crack to me. I’m obsessed with it. I’m not “obsessed” with Israel. I hate writing about Israel. I wish I never had to think about it. Israel just happens to be the focal point of the worst things that are happening in the world right now, all with the backing of the western empire I live under. I can’t just not talk about this; if I didn’t I’d be a shitty person. This is obvious to anyone with a working mind and a healthy heart. ❖ Israel apologists conflate all Jews with the actions of the state of Israel. They will deny that they do this, but they indisputably do. That is the message they are circulating when they accuse anyone who criticizes Israel’s actions of hating all Jews. They create antisemitism. ❖ Trump says he wants to mutually denuclearize with Russia and China and negotiate a mutual 50 percent cut to the military budget of all three nations. These would both be wonderful new developments. And, I’ll believe it when I see it. As always, ignore their words. Watch their actions. ❖ I’m harder on people who get close to the truth and then swerve than I am on people who are just completely asleep. Anarchists who wind up supporting NATO. Conspiracy analysts who wind up supporting Trump. Socialists who wind up supporting Democrats. These half-awake sleepwalkers annoy me in ways the average fully asleep member of the public does not, because they’re forming their dopey worldviews based on a lot more information. I wouldn’t be mad at a blind person for knocking over my things, but someone who has one working eye and stumbles around wearing two eyepatches is just being a douchebag. They’re like a man who pulled his head out of his ass, looked around, and then knowingly re-inserted it. ❖ Someone recently tried to tell me that the “jury is still out” on Trump’s actions regarding Israel, because maybe he’ll wind up being not so bad on the issue. This is nonsense. The jury isn’t out on Trump regarding Israel. He’s sending Israel weapons while it’s murdering people in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon. These are not things Trump might do. These are not things Trump is saying he will do. These are things Trump is doing. Presently. Even if you choose to believe his ethnic cleansing plans for Gaza are actually brilliant 9-D chess maneuvers secretly designed to free Palestine and achieve peace (and they absolutely are not), you have to ignore hard material actions you are seeing right now right in front of your face in order to believe the jury is still out. You also have to ignore the fact that Trump has publicly admitted to being bought and controlled by the Adelsons. There are arguments to be made that in terms of hard material facts on the ground so far Trump was the lesser evil on Israel, but there are no arguments to be made that he isn’t still very evil. The jury is not out on that. The jury is very much in. And it doesn’t actually matter if Trump winds up being less destructive than Biden on Palestine. The election has been over for months. Trump is the president now. Biden is completely irrelevant. There is no excuse for defending the depraved actions of the president of the world’s most powerful and destructive nation. The experience of talking to Trump supporters about Trump’s Israel sycophancy is identical to the experience of talking to Biden supporters about Biden’s Israel sycophancy. It’s exactly the same. These partisan livestock will make excuses for literally anything. ❖ Reading by Tim Foley.

Caitlin Johnstone

71,579 次观看 • 1 年前

This is Andy Burnham, the new British Prime Minister. He is addressing an issue that I have been talking about on this page for years: the obsession with university degrees that often do little to improve the employment prospects of our young people. There is enormous peer pressure for young people to go to university because many have been brought up to believe that a degree is automatically superior to a qualification from a polytechnic or a technical college. Yet that thinking is based on an outdated education model that no longer reflects the realities of today’s global economy. Many young people never receive proper career guidance. They are encouraged to pursue degrees without first asking a simple question. What opportunities will this qualification create? Meanwhile, careers in electrical engineering, plumbing, welding, fitting and turning, construction, refrigeration, vehicle mechanics, and many other skilled trades are overlooked, even though they are among the most financially rewarding professions today. I have experienced this myself. I have been trying to get someone to do a relatively small job at my home in the United Kingdom. The earliest available appointment was two weeks away. To hang about 20 framed portraits on the walls of a house, a handyman charges between £600 and £700 for roughly two hours of work. Plumbing is even more expensive. These skilled trades often pay better than many occupations requiring university degrees that have little demand in the labour market. That is why I am pleased to hear the British Prime Minister speaking openly about this issue. It is encouraging to see a leader acknowledging something that many of us have been saying for years. When I look at Zimbabwe’s history, particularly during the period that many people refer to as Rhodesia’s economic peak, one thing stands out. The country’s industrial success was built not on universities, but on the expansion of technical colleges, vocational training centres, and polytechnics. The University of Rhodesia produced administrators, professionals, and managers, but the people who built the factories, maintained the machinery, wired the electrical systems, constructed the roads and bridges, and kept heavy industry running largely came through technical and vocational education. At one point, Rhodesia operated one of the most sophisticated railway systems in Africa, and it was even ahead of the British railway system at the time. The system was not run primarily by university graduates; it was built, maintained, and operated largely by graduates of technical colleges. Yet it became the backbone of the Rhodesian economy, transporting raw materials, manufactured goods, and agricultural products across the country and beyond its borders. Industrial economies are built by skilled technicians as much as they are by university graduates. This is also personal for me. My late father ran a training programme in Murewa where he taught many former liberation war fighters practical skills such as carpentry and construction after the war. I watched him doing it. Those men left with trades that enabled them to build businesses and support their families. Some of them became extremely successful. When I was imprisoned for exposing corruption, one of the people my father had trained arrived at my home and left US$5,000 to ensure that I had whatever I needed while I was in prison. He had gone on to establish a successful construction company operating in Namibia, South Africa, and Botswana. His success was not built on a fashionable university degree. It was built on practical skills that created real economic value. That is why career guidance matters. Young people deserve honest advice, not outdated assumptions. We should stop treating university as the only respectable path to success and instead encourage young people to choose careers based on opportunity, aptitude, and the needs of the economy. I am deliberately not naming particular degrees because I do not want to discourage those who are already studying them. However, we cannot ignore the reality that some qualifications have very limited employment prospects. Even British newspapers such as The London Times regularly analyse graduate outcomes, comparing degrees that consistently lead to well-paid employment with those that often leave graduates underemployed or unemployed. As adults, parents, teachers, policymakers, and influencers, we have a responsibility to guide young people honestly. We must stop romanticising qualifications simply because they come from universities. Today, in the United Kingdom, an experienced plumber, electrician, or heating engineer can earn considerably more than many graduates in professions that require years at university. That tells us something about where the modern economy places value. Africa’s industrial revolution will not be driven by producing endless numbers of graduates whose skills do not match the demands of the economy. It will be driven by expanding technical colleges, vocational institutions, apprenticeships, and polytechnics that produce electricians, engineers, mechanics, builders, welders, technicians, and other skilled professionals capable of building industries rather than merely administering them. That is one of the most important lessons history has already taught us. The evidence is there for anyone willing to look at it objectively. Andy Burnham emphasised this reality by announcing a major investment in Britain’s nuclear deterrent that will create and support 22,000 apprenticeships. That is what political leadership should be looking at and working towards accomplishing not just endless empty speeches.

This is Andy Burnham, the new British Prime Minister. He is addressing an issue that I have been talking about on this page for years: the obsession with university degrees that often do little to improve the employment prospects of our young people. There is enormous peer pressure for young people to go to university because many have been brought up to believe that a degree is automatically superior to a qualification from a polytechnic or a technical college. Yet that thinking is based on an outdated education model that no longer reflects the realities of today’s global economy. Many young people never receive proper career guidance. They are encouraged to pursue degrees without first asking a simple question. What opportunities will this qualification create? Meanwhile, careers in electrical engineering, plumbing, welding, fitting and turning, construction, refrigeration, vehicle mechanics, and many other skilled trades are overlooked, even though they are among the most financially rewarding professions today. I have experienced this myself. I have been trying to get someone to do a relatively small job at my home in the United Kingdom. The earliest available appointment was two weeks away. To hang about 20 framed portraits on the walls of a house, a handyman charges between £600 and £700 for roughly two hours of work. Plumbing is even more expensive. These skilled trades often pay better than many occupations requiring university degrees that have little demand in the labour market. That is why I am pleased to hear the British Prime Minister speaking openly about this issue. It is encouraging to see a leader acknowledging something that many of us have been saying for years. When I look at Zimbabwe’s history, particularly during the period that many people refer to as Rhodesia’s economic peak, one thing stands out. The country’s industrial success was built not on universities, but on the expansion of technical colleges, vocational training centres, and polytechnics. The University of Rhodesia produced administrators, professionals, and managers, but the people who built the factories, maintained the machinery, wired the electrical systems, constructed the roads and bridges, and kept heavy industry running largely came through technical and vocational education. At one point, Rhodesia operated one of the most sophisticated railway systems in Africa, and it was even ahead of the British railway system at the time. The system was not run primarily by university graduates; it was built, maintained, and operated largely by graduates of technical colleges. Yet it became the backbone of the Rhodesian economy, transporting raw materials, manufactured goods, and agricultural products across the country and beyond its borders. Industrial economies are built by skilled technicians as much as they are by university graduates. This is also personal for me. My late father ran a training programme in Murewa where he taught many former liberation war fighters practical skills such as carpentry and construction after the war. I watched him doing it. Those men left with trades that enabled them to build businesses and support their families. Some of them became extremely successful. When I was imprisoned for exposing corruption, one of the people my father had trained arrived at my home and left US$5,000 to ensure that I had whatever I needed while I was in prison. He had gone on to establish a successful construction company operating in Namibia, South Africa, and Botswana. His success was not built on a fashionable university degree. It was built on practical skills that created real economic value. That is why career guidance matters. Young people deserve honest advice, not outdated assumptions. We should stop treating university as the only respectable path to success and instead encourage young people to choose careers based on opportunity, aptitude, and the needs of the economy. I am deliberately not naming particular degrees because I do not want to discourage those who are already studying them. However, we cannot ignore the reality that some qualifications have very limited employment prospects. Even British newspapers such as The London Times regularly analyse graduate outcomes, comparing degrees that consistently lead to well-paid employment with those that often leave graduates underemployed or unemployed. As adults, parents, teachers, policymakers, and influencers, we have a responsibility to guide young people honestly. We must stop romanticising qualifications simply because they come from universities. Today, in the United Kingdom, an experienced plumber, electrician, or heating engineer can earn considerably more than many graduates in professions that require years at university. That tells us something about where the modern economy places value. Africa’s industrial revolution will not be driven by producing endless numbers of graduates whose skills do not match the demands of the economy. It will be driven by expanding technical colleges, vocational institutions, apprenticeships, and polytechnics that produce electricians, engineers, mechanics, builders, welders, technicians, and other skilled professionals capable of building industries rather than merely administering them. That is one of the most important lessons history has already taught us. The evidence is there for anyone willing to look at it objectively. Andy Burnham emphasised this reality by announcing a major investment in Britain’s nuclear deterrent that will create and support 22,000 apprenticeships. That is what political leadership should be looking at and working towards accomplishing not just endless empty speeches.

Hopewell Chin’ono

56,905 次观看 • 12 天前

French-Ukrainian singer Paul Manandise: "Leaders of Europe, I am addressing you from Kyiv. And at the same time, I am addressing you from the depths of my European heart. I was taught, just like you, what the words "never again" mean. I was taught to be proud of a continent that had experienced barbarism, absolute horror, but that emerged from it with values: human dignity, freedom, solidarity, and justice. I carried these values like an inner flag. I deeply believed in Europe. I believed in your oaths, your history lessons, your commemorations, your speeches about human rights. Never would I have imagined that one day Europe would look away while a terrorist regime led by Vladimir Putin commits absolute horror at its own borders. Because things must be called by their proper names. What Putin is doing is not a 'military' operation. It is a war of terror. It is a policy of annihilation. He wants to break a people - my people, the Ukrainians. He wants to extinguish an entire nation, to dissolve it through fear, hunger, cold, and darkness. He deliberately bombs power plants, our power plants, not for any real military advantage, but as collective punishment. So that families shiver from the cold in their own homes. So that hospitals struggle to keep machines running. So that children, instead of learning to read and write in peace, learn what it means to shiver from the cold, from the roar of missiles, what endless darkness means. Imagine for a moment a European child - French, German, Italian, or Belgian - doing homework by candlelight, because someone, out of pure hatred, decided to destroy all your power plants. Imagine your parents in darkness, your grandparents in the cold, your cities plunged into an artificial and hostile night not because of a natural disaster, but because one person, sitting in his bunker, decided to turn electricity into a weapon of collective torture. That is what we are living through. This is not an excess. It is not an accident. It is a strategy. And this strategy has a name: terror. State terrorism. Vladimir Putin is targeting civilians. Deliberately. He is targeting residential buildings, residential areas, hospitals, schools, and vital infrastructure. He wants to kill Ukrainian civilians. He wants to eradicate every Ukrainian. Absolute horror is not only the sound of explosions; it is also the silence that follows them, when a mother no longer knows how to keep her child warm. It is an old man wearing three coats to get through the night. It is a little girl who flinches at every shadow, at every rustle, because for her, the sky is no longer a place of dreams, but a place where death can fall at any moment. In the midst of all this, there is us, the Ukrainians. We resist. We repair. We rebuild. We restore power lines under shelling, again and again. We keep our flags raised, our language alive, our songs, our books, our schools. The Ukrainian heart beats. It beats louder than the explosions. It beats for freedom, for dignity, for the basic opportunity of living normally. But there is another pain. It is seeing Europe betray itself. I say this to you as a European at heart: I never thought I would see the continent of human rights, the continent that honors the memory of the mass graves of the past, hesitate, waver, calculate, maneuver, while the same European people are being tortured, while absolute horror is repeated using methods that your history books described long ago. I was told that Europe is about solidarity. That they don't leave a neighbor who has been attacked alone. That a child who is cold somewhere in Europe is not indifferent to every capital, every government, every conscience. And yet today, as Putin bombs our power plants, systematically destroys our energy system, tries to make us freeze, break us with exhaustion and fear, I see hesitation, compromises, fear of executioner being "provoked too much" - as if what is already happening is not enough to call it a horror. I say this without hatred, but with great sadness: when Europe retreats, it betrays not only Ukraine. It betrays itself. It betrays the lessons it teaches the rest of the world. Because if European values do not apply to Kyiv, if they do not apply to these children who are cold, if they do not apply to those civilians whom Putin is deliberately targeting, then what are they really worth? The Ukrainian heart has not betrayed Europe. It is fighting for it. Every day. Every night. Under bombings. In darkness. In the cold. Our soldiers on the front line, our engineers repairing power lines, our doctors performing surgery by generator light, our teachers continuing to teach in school basements - we all still believe in the values we were taught: freedom, dignity, justice. What Putin is doing is an absolute horror. What history is putting before Europe today is an absolute test. So I ask you, the leaders and citizens of Europe: What do you really believe in? Are you ready to defend what you claim to believe in, or are these values nothing more than words on commemorative plaques and in official speeches? Here, in Ukraine, we have already answered. We have chosen to endure. We have chosen to remain standing, even on the edge of darkness. Now it is your turn to decide whether, in the face of the absolute horror of what Putin is doing, Europe will remain true to itself or whether it will accept becoming a spectator to its own betrayal." 📹 & 🖋: Paul Michel Manandise/Facebook

French-Ukrainian singer Paul Manandise: "Leaders of Europe, I am addressing you from Kyiv. And at the same time, I am addressing you from the depths of my European heart. I was taught, just like you, what the words "never again" mean. I was taught to be proud of a continent that had experienced barbarism, absolute horror, but that emerged from it with values: human dignity, freedom, solidarity, and justice. I carried these values like an inner flag. I deeply believed in Europe. I believed in your oaths, your history lessons, your commemorations, your speeches about human rights. Never would I have imagined that one day Europe would look away while a terrorist regime led by Vladimir Putin commits absolute horror at its own borders. Because things must be called by their proper names. What Putin is doing is not a 'military' operation. It is a war of terror. It is a policy of annihilation. He wants to break a people - my people, the Ukrainians. He wants to extinguish an entire nation, to dissolve it through fear, hunger, cold, and darkness. He deliberately bombs power plants, our power plants, not for any real military advantage, but as collective punishment. So that families shiver from the cold in their own homes. So that hospitals struggle to keep machines running. So that children, instead of learning to read and write in peace, learn what it means to shiver from the cold, from the roar of missiles, what endless darkness means. Imagine for a moment a European child - French, German, Italian, or Belgian - doing homework by candlelight, because someone, out of pure hatred, decided to destroy all your power plants. Imagine your parents in darkness, your grandparents in the cold, your cities plunged into an artificial and hostile night not because of a natural disaster, but because one person, sitting in his bunker, decided to turn electricity into a weapon of collective torture. That is what we are living through. This is not an excess. It is not an accident. It is a strategy. And this strategy has a name: terror. State terrorism. Vladimir Putin is targeting civilians. Deliberately. He is targeting residential buildings, residential areas, hospitals, schools, and vital infrastructure. He wants to kill Ukrainian civilians. He wants to eradicate every Ukrainian. Absolute horror is not only the sound of explosions; it is also the silence that follows them, when a mother no longer knows how to keep her child warm. It is an old man wearing three coats to get through the night. It is a little girl who flinches at every shadow, at every rustle, because for her, the sky is no longer a place of dreams, but a place where death can fall at any moment. In the midst of all this, there is us, the Ukrainians. We resist. We repair. We rebuild. We restore power lines under shelling, again and again. We keep our flags raised, our language alive, our songs, our books, our schools. The Ukrainian heart beats. It beats louder than the explosions. It beats for freedom, for dignity, for the basic opportunity of living normally. But there is another pain. It is seeing Europe betray itself. I say this to you as a European at heart: I never thought I would see the continent of human rights, the continent that honors the memory of the mass graves of the past, hesitate, waver, calculate, maneuver, while the same European people are being tortured, while absolute horror is repeated using methods that your history books described long ago. I was told that Europe is about solidarity. That they don't leave a neighbor who has been attacked alone. That a child who is cold somewhere in Europe is not indifferent to every capital, every government, every conscience. And yet today, as Putin bombs our power plants, systematically destroys our energy system, tries to make us freeze, break us with exhaustion and fear, I see hesitation, compromises, fear of executioner being "provoked too much" - as if what is already happening is not enough to call it a horror. I say this without hatred, but with great sadness: when Europe retreats, it betrays not only Ukraine. It betrays itself. It betrays the lessons it teaches the rest of the world. Because if European values do not apply to Kyiv, if they do not apply to these children who are cold, if they do not apply to those civilians whom Putin is deliberately targeting, then what are they really worth? The Ukrainian heart has not betrayed Europe. It is fighting for it. Every day. Every night. Under bombings. In darkness. In the cold. Our soldiers on the front line, our engineers repairing power lines, our doctors performing surgery by generator light, our teachers continuing to teach in school basements - we all still believe in the values we were taught: freedom, dignity, justice. What Putin is doing is an absolute horror. What history is putting before Europe today is an absolute test. So I ask you, the leaders and citizens of Europe: What do you really believe in? Are you ready to defend what you claim to believe in, or are these values nothing more than words on commemorative plaques and in official speeches? Here, in Ukraine, we have already answered. We have chosen to endure. We have chosen to remain standing, even on the edge of darkness. Now it is your turn to decide whether, in the face of the absolute horror of what Putin is doing, Europe will remain true to itself or whether it will accept becoming a spectator to its own betrayal." 📹 & 🖋: Paul Michel Manandise/Facebook

Anton Gerashchenko

52,218 次观看 • 6 个月前

Trans tween stabber in BC? What the media isn't telling you 🏳️‍⚧️ After weeks of investigating and dealing with legal hurdles, Rebel News' Drea Humphrey uncovers what really happened during a stabbing incident at Springvalley Middle School in Kelowna, British Columbia. When reports first emerged that Springvalley Middle School had gone into lockdown in Kelowna, British Columbia, and a youth had been arrested, the public was left with the impression that it was a frightening but relatively minor event. RCMP initially described what occurred as "suspicious circumstances" at the school, and media reports suggested a student had suffered little more than a superficial scratch from a dull kitchen knife. But after weeks of investigation, I’ve uncovered a far more disturbing account. ➡️ Family members and others close to some of the victims claim four girls were impacted by the traumatic event, where an intruder believed to identify as transgender, terrorized the girls in and around the girls' washroom while declaring, "I need to kill someone today." In today's report, I speak with the parents of one of the victims, who describe the horror their 11-year-old daughter went through. "They stabbed our daughter in the back and said to the children, 'I need to kill someone today,' proceeded to push the other children and push our child against the wall and continue to hit her continuously in the face and the head and the chest." The child's mother and father, whom we are not identifying to protect the identities of the youths involved, say it wasn't until a friend yelled her name that the attack shifted. “This person then grabbed her wrist and gave her scratch wounds on her arms that drew blood, and all her bracelets were broken, and then they were able to get away and find a teacher." Adding salt to the wounds for the family is both how little support they say they received initially, including being called and told to come get their child instead of the school calling an ambulance to provide immediate medical care, and the "mere scratch" narrative that was fed to the public in an already widely underreported story. "The fact that they did not do their due diligence to check on my child's well-being after being stabbed... everything they went about, they dropped the ball and it was not okay. Things need to change," the girl's mother told Rebel News. "There was an attacker. There were children. There were injuries," her father said. "Don't lie in the media. Stop trying to sweep it under the rug." The parents also described weeks of frustration trying to obtain basic answers from both the school and authorities, saying repeated emails went largely unanswered until they unexpectedly returned to the school themselves. Those frustrations mirror those raised by families in the rural community of Falkland, B.C., located about two hours away. A concerned grandmother also joined me in this report to discuss how parents had to take the matter of school safety into their own hands after a troubled youth's kill list targeting students was discovered. The youth was still living across from and walking around an elementary school they were expected to trust sending their children and grandchildren to. These events, the Springvalley Middle School attack, the Falkland kill list, and the tragic Tumbler Ridge school massacre resulting in the deaths of eight, mostly young people, all taking place this year in B.C., show that public awareness and attention to the topic of school safety is an important matter of public interest. Lori-Ann describes how, despite the potential threat, the reasonable uncertainty, and the nearest police detachment being 30 minutes away, no RCMP officers or security personnel were assigned to keep watch for a reasonable period during school hours. "It shouldn't have to take a tragedy for things to change," said the father. Bringing this story, the real story, to light wasn't an easy task. In addition to digging for on-camera and off-camera statements from those close to the victims, I had to navigate publication bans under the Youth Criminal Justice Act that, even now, prevent me from disclosing much of the ordeal. To ensure the other side of this important story could be told, the victims' experiences could be validated, and enough awareness could hopefully be raised to create meaningful school safety policy changes, Rebel News sought legal assistance through the Independent Press Gallery. The non-profit, which protects freedom of the press through donor support, retained Kyle Bienvenu of Hira Rowan LLP to provide legal advice throughout portions of my investigation. According to the BC Prosecution Service, the youth apprehended in the Springvalley attack now faces seven charges: two counts of assault with a weapon, three counts of assault, one count of uttering threats, and one count of possessing a weapon for a dangerous purpose. The case remains before the courts, and because the accused is a youth, much of the evidence and proceedings remain protected from publication.

Trans tween stabber in BC? What the media isn't telling you 🏳️‍⚧️ After weeks of investigating and dealing with legal hurdles, Rebel News' Drea Humphrey uncovers what really happened during a stabbing incident at Springvalley Middle School in Kelowna, British Columbia. When reports first emerged that Springvalley Middle School had gone into lockdown in Kelowna, British Columbia, and a youth had been arrested, the public was left with the impression that it was a frightening but relatively minor event. RCMP initially described what occurred as "suspicious circumstances" at the school, and media reports suggested a student had suffered little more than a superficial scratch from a dull kitchen knife. But after weeks of investigation, I’ve uncovered a far more disturbing account. ➡️ Family members and others close to some of the victims claim four girls were impacted by the traumatic event, where an intruder believed to identify as transgender, terrorized the girls in and around the girls' washroom while declaring, "I need to kill someone today." In today's report, I speak with the parents of one of the victims, who describe the horror their 11-year-old daughter went through. "They stabbed our daughter in the back and said to the children, 'I need to kill someone today,' proceeded to push the other children and push our child against the wall and continue to hit her continuously in the face and the head and the chest." The child's mother and father, whom we are not identifying to protect the identities of the youths involved, say it wasn't until a friend yelled her name that the attack shifted. “This person then grabbed her wrist and gave her scratch wounds on her arms that drew blood, and all her bracelets were broken, and then they were able to get away and find a teacher." Adding salt to the wounds for the family is both how little support they say they received initially, including being called and told to come get their child instead of the school calling an ambulance to provide immediate medical care, and the "mere scratch" narrative that was fed to the public in an already widely underreported story. "The fact that they did not do their due diligence to check on my child's well-being after being stabbed... everything they went about, they dropped the ball and it was not okay. Things need to change," the girl's mother told Rebel News. "There was an attacker. There were children. There were injuries," her father said. "Don't lie in the media. Stop trying to sweep it under the rug." The parents also described weeks of frustration trying to obtain basic answers from both the school and authorities, saying repeated emails went largely unanswered until they unexpectedly returned to the school themselves. Those frustrations mirror those raised by families in the rural community of Falkland, B.C., located about two hours away. A concerned grandmother also joined me in this report to discuss how parents had to take the matter of school safety into their own hands after a troubled youth's kill list targeting students was discovered. The youth was still living across from and walking around an elementary school they were expected to trust sending their children and grandchildren to. These events, the Springvalley Middle School attack, the Falkland kill list, and the tragic Tumbler Ridge school massacre resulting in the deaths of eight, mostly young people, all taking place this year in B.C., show that public awareness and attention to the topic of school safety is an important matter of public interest. Lori-Ann describes how, despite the potential threat, the reasonable uncertainty, and the nearest police detachment being 30 minutes away, no RCMP officers or security personnel were assigned to keep watch for a reasonable period during school hours. "It shouldn't have to take a tragedy for things to change," said the father. Bringing this story, the real story, to light wasn't an easy task. In addition to digging for on-camera and off-camera statements from those close to the victims, I had to navigate publication bans under the Youth Criminal Justice Act that, even now, prevent me from disclosing much of the ordeal. To ensure the other side of this important story could be told, the victims' experiences could be validated, and enough awareness could hopefully be raised to create meaningful school safety policy changes, Rebel News sought legal assistance through the Independent Press Gallery. The non-profit, which protects freedom of the press through donor support, retained Kyle Bienvenu of Hira Rowan LLP to provide legal advice throughout portions of my investigation. According to the BC Prosecution Service, the youth apprehended in the Springvalley attack now faces seven charges: two counts of assault with a weapon, three counts of assault, one count of uttering threats, and one count of possessing a weapon for a dangerous purpose. The case remains before the courts, and because the accused is a youth, much of the evidence and proceedings remain protected from publication.

Rebel News

20,044 次观看 • 9 天前

Carol Vorderman in conversation with James O'Brein over Reform UK's Makerfield by-election candidate Robert Kenyon's insulting remarks JOB, "Carol Vorderman has asked Robert Kenyon, a Reform UK's candidate in the imminent Makerfield by election, for an apology, for posts on a now deleted X account in which he, Well, you'll find out, if you don't know already, she said, I want an apology from Rob Kenyon to me and to all the other people he's abused online." JOB, "I sat down with Carol yesterday afternoon to talk about this and, one or two other things. It occurred to me, just sitting down now, Carol, that this is not something you, you sought because you haven't been in any sense reticent in recent years with your political opinions and even with activism, but you've been dragged into this deeply unpleasant situation entirely innocently." JOB, "So unpleasant, in fact, that I'm not sure I can repeat, I'm not sure I'm comfortable saying in front of you the words that Robert Kenyon chose to endorse and defend on, social media." CV, "Well, I am, because it's important that people know. And this is just one comment. He has made multiple comments which are online abuse about me and lots of other people. So the one specifically about me that he endorsed was I want to smell and lick Carol Vorderman's eight letter word beginning with A." CV, "And reform have said, oh, it's just locker room banter. I don't know why they're using the term locker room, by the way, because I thought we said changing rooms in this country. But that's an entirely different, different, question. But the thing is, James, I'm not upset by it, I am angered by it." CV, "And the reason that I'm angered by it is because every woman listening, any woman who is on social media will have similar said to her, either abusive, all the other things that he said. You know, there was some forum that he was on, rugby, league forum, and they were posting pictures of the girls, the women who play." CV, "And then he was saying, oh, English women, they don't care. All they want to do with their fat bellies, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Then there was some, European women. Then he was saying, you know, oh, you wouldn't get me off them with a bazooka." CV, "You know, all this stuff, stuff about abortion. I mean, it's just disgusting stuff. And it's not just one comment, it's a tirade of online abuse. And every woman listening who has had that will know how it makes them feel." CV, "And so I am angry that a political party can take this person on one without obviously vetting him properly. But also that they just defend it and they're fine with that." JOB, "He was not a politician at the time. He was an ordinary man from an ordinary place, said Danny Craig group." CV, "Really? That's what. Yeah, that's what posh boys, who lead the Reform Party think, of ordinary men. Well, ordinary men generally are lovely, you know, they really are." JOB, "We do our best." CV, "Well, you are. And they respect women. All of that is true. But you have this growing minority who are extremely abusive. And I'm 65, James. And so I've been, you know, and women my age, we've been through the hard years." CV, "So in the 70s, you know, I was a bright kid from a comp in North Wales. Free school meals kid. And it took, you know, a lot to get to a Cambridge college because there were only, three girls colleges." CV, "And I think four or five had gone what they called mixed. So these are boys colleges taking on women's colleges. And it was like, why wouldn't you? You know, I was from a boys and girls comp, but we had to go through that." CV, "You had to be the first woman to do this. First woman from a state school. Northwest goes Cambridge first. You know, I was, I think, when I did engineering, There were about 300 students in our year, four or five of them were girls. I worked underground, me and 2,000 men, all this." CV, "So we have done the hard years over decades, all that. I wanted to be a fighter pilot. You can't, because you're a girl and you don't have the appendage that's required. You know, all of this nonsense that we had to put up with. So, for me, that this Reform Party is saying on day one, they would repeal the Equality act." CV, "And we all know what that means. So, you know, the protections against harassment of women in the workplace, the, equal pay, maternity leave, maternity pay, all of those. We're going to scrap all those. So it is indicative of the way in which this might go, as we've seen in America." JOB, "I think talking of ordinary men, the person who pushed back against him on social media was. It was a rather better model of masculinity." CV, "Yes, absolutely. So he's the author, Chris Ryan, who is a former SAS hero, a very successful author. Chris is his pen name. And, he absolutely defended me because he is a real man." CV, "He's not a pretend. He's a real guy and a guy who respects women." JOB, "I suppose, in some sense, the writing was on the wall with the leadership of reform who have not responded by the way, to, our, requests a, response to these allegations of misogyny, including the comments directed at you." JOB, "But when James McMurdoch Ended up in Parliament just after the last election, and, it quickly emerged that he'd been jailed for attacking a former girlfriend." CV, "Yes. And here is another example, a very serious example of, to me, reforms, excuses for things. So I think it was a Times newspaper fact he only got in with a majority of 98." CV, "So imagine if this information had been available beforehand about him. So, shortly after he was elected in 2024 as a Reform MP, I think it was a Times newspaper, found that he had been convicted and served time for, assaulting his girlfriend." CV, "He then said in his defense, oh, it was a push. Then the official court documents show that she was on the floor. He was kicking her multiple times while she was on the floor and had to be, dragged away by two security guards." CV, "Very different stories. Richard Tice then defends it, saying, oh, well, he's served his time. That was a long time ago. It doesn't matter. I am sorry. It matters. It matters to women. We know how much harassment online has increased and offline." CV, "So this is a time for all women to stand up and say, enough now, we are not going backwards." JOB, "I suppose one example is. It could be chalked up as accidental or carelessness. But two examples and emerging patterns speak of something altogether more sinister." CV, "Yes, well, Lee Anderson, bless him, when he was a Tory. That was after he was a Labour." JOB, "Yes." CV, "And now he's a Reform." JOB, "Correct. Well, at the time of this conversation, we'll have to check before we play it" CV, "out on the program tomorrow. Yeah, so he was, in the Conservative Party at the time and he was slinging insults to me all the time on Twitter in, the days when we used to be on Twitter. And, you know, obviously now he's reformed, he thinks it's perfectly acceptable." CV, "So there is a pattern there with this party. And, that is my concern that they will, if they get into, and they've stated it out in the open, we will repeal the Equality Act." JOB, "It's surprising to me when people like Danny Kruger talk about ordinary people. An ordinary man for an ordinary man." CV, "When he went to Eton." JOB, "Yeah. And, well, also his mother is on telly as well, so, you know, he or she at, at least will be aware of the misogyny that police. Yeah, yeah. You think that that might have given him a slightly more sensitive insight into what it's like for women like you. And, and you are tough. I mean, I don't mean that in a patronizing way." CV, "I take it as a compliment." JOB, "Good, I'm glad you do because you are perfectly capable of looking after yourself. A lot of women, both online and offline, are not, of course, and those are the kind of women that, misogynistic men prey on." CV, "But the thing is, I, I have a tough skin now because of all of the abuse over decades. And it. You know, I can remember when I wore a short skirt to the BAFTAs. I was age 39. Well, it was like I'd killed my grandmother the next day." CV, "It was the quest. Even the BBC made a whole Kilroy show about it. Flew this dress in copy dress from Paris. And, the question was, should a woman age 39 wear a dress above the knee? Jeez, I mean, that's my lifetime. This isn't Victorian days or my mother or post war." CV, "This is me in my lifetime. So, you know, as I go back to the beginning, women my age who love the fact that our daughters or nieces, or grandchildren have, can play football, you know, very happily can be applauded for what they do in sport." CV, "Can be. Oh, another thing that I'll, Kenyon said was that women can't referee, drive, take directions. And he had a go at various female sports presenters on the telly. You know, it's constant, it's consistent." JOB, "So they're not, they're not up to the job. They're only there to tick a box. And then declaring and From a political point of view, this is interesting actually stating I'm sexist. Sorry, but I am." CV, "Yeah." JOB, "And then the defense from reform UK becomes. These comments were made before he entered politics. He's perfectly entitled to his own personal opinions." CV, "That was three weeks ago." JOB, "Yeah, yeah. It's extraordinary that he can state that because Murdoch didn't get dropped by the party for the conviction for battering his ex, he got dropped after it emerged that he'd taken Covid loans out under the COVID support scheme. I think that's still ongoing." JOB, "But to state I am sexist, sorry, but I am in 2024 would have probably been a career ending revelation. Do you think? We're going a bit backwards, But I think we" CV, "have the potential to go backwards and we now, you know, generally you go, life's good. You know, doing this, that and the other. When I began my career as an engineer, funnily enough, not many women then were talking about having a career because not Many women have been to university and all of that." CV, "Now, thankfully, decades later, women are having careers. But also, housing was a lot cheaper then. So now we need to. You need, two incomes to fund a mortgage generally in this country." CV, "So the whole business of, oh, well, we're going to scrap the law that says about equal pay. That's going to affect people directly. And this is what I want people to understand, really. This is. This is not just about a woman getting on a high horse about something." CV, "This is very, very, very. Couldn't be more serious." JOB, "And, yeah, it is, of course, people like Nigel Farage and Sarah Potchin who claim that they're the party dedicated to protecting women and children. I mean, it's beyond irony. It emerged yesterday that one in five of the people arrested over the riots in 2024, which many people feel were fermented by Nigel Farage's social media activ." JOB, "Five of the people arrested over those riots have since been reported to the police for domestic abuse. So to simultaneously encourage and excuse the misogyny that's been directed at you and at other women while claiming. And, of course, to put a violent offender into Parliament and say that that's not an excluding offense while simultaneously claiming that they act for women and children is, It's beyond parody, isn't it?" CV, "And those same people who were arrested, there were almost 900 of them, weren't there? About the riots across the country at the time, 41% had already, been reported to the police for domestic abuse." JOB, "So who are the women and children they're dedicated to protecting?" CV, "Well, quite." JOB, "And who are they protecting them from?" CV, "None." JOB, "It's good to see you. I knew that you would be, perturbed by this, but." CV, "I am." JOB, "But enraged?" CV, "Yes, I am." JOB, "And are you expecting an apology? I know you've demanded." CV, "Well, I can't." JOB, "You did not demand anything." CV, "I can't demand anything. I have asked for an apology. Not for me." JOB, "No." CV, "But for all of us. And for his comments so far. I just think we're on day three. Nothing." JOB, "Not even a whisper nothing or a nothing." CV, "He's still running away. Hiding away from cameras, maybe." JOB, "Don't hold your breath, Carol. Thank you." CV, "Thanks, James." JOB, "Still waiting. I hope she didn't hold her breath. We got a statement from Reform Councillor Kenyon, made these comments before entering politics. We are confident that he is an excellent candidate who will be a superb local MP for Makerfield. And a full list of all the candidates running there can be found at lbc co uk"

Carol Vorderman in conversation with James O'Brein over Reform UK's Makerfield by-election candidate Robert Kenyon's insulting remarks JOB, "Carol Vorderman has asked Robert Kenyon, a Reform UK's candidate in the imminent Makerfield by election, for an apology, for posts on a now deleted X account in which he, Well, you'll find out, if you don't know already, she said, I want an apology from Rob Kenyon to me and to all the other people he's abused online." JOB, "I sat down with Carol yesterday afternoon to talk about this and, one or two other things. It occurred to me, just sitting down now, Carol, that this is not something you, you sought because you haven't been in any sense reticent in recent years with your political opinions and even with activism, but you've been dragged into this deeply unpleasant situation entirely innocently." JOB, "So unpleasant, in fact, that I'm not sure I can repeat, I'm not sure I'm comfortable saying in front of you the words that Robert Kenyon chose to endorse and defend on, social media." CV, "Well, I am, because it's important that people know. And this is just one comment. He has made multiple comments which are online abuse about me and lots of other people. So the one specifically about me that he endorsed was I want to smell and lick Carol Vorderman's eight letter word beginning with A." CV, "And reform have said, oh, it's just locker room banter. I don't know why they're using the term locker room, by the way, because I thought we said changing rooms in this country. But that's an entirely different, different, question. But the thing is, James, I'm not upset by it, I am angered by it." CV, "And the reason that I'm angered by it is because every woman listening, any woman who is on social media will have similar said to her, either abusive, all the other things that he said. You know, there was some forum that he was on, rugby, league forum, and they were posting pictures of the girls, the women who play." CV, "And then he was saying, oh, English women, they don't care. All they want to do with their fat bellies, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Then there was some, European women. Then he was saying, you know, oh, you wouldn't get me off them with a bazooka." CV, "You know, all this stuff, stuff about abortion. I mean, it's just disgusting stuff. And it's not just one comment, it's a tirade of online abuse. And every woman listening who has had that will know how it makes them feel." CV, "And so I am angry that a political party can take this person on one without obviously vetting him properly. But also that they just defend it and they're fine with that." JOB, "He was not a politician at the time. He was an ordinary man from an ordinary place, said Danny Craig group." CV, "Really? That's what. Yeah, that's what posh boys, who lead the Reform Party think, of ordinary men. Well, ordinary men generally are lovely, you know, they really are." JOB, "We do our best." CV, "Well, you are. And they respect women. All of that is true. But you have this growing minority who are extremely abusive. And I'm 65, James. And so I've been, you know, and women my age, we've been through the hard years." CV, "So in the 70s, you know, I was a bright kid from a comp in North Wales. Free school meals kid. And it took, you know, a lot to get to a Cambridge college because there were only, three girls colleges." CV, "And I think four or five had gone what they called mixed. So these are boys colleges taking on women's colleges. And it was like, why wouldn't you? You know, I was from a boys and girls comp, but we had to go through that." CV, "You had to be the first woman to do this. First woman from a state school. Northwest goes Cambridge first. You know, I was, I think, when I did engineering, There were about 300 students in our year, four or five of them were girls. I worked underground, me and 2,000 men, all this." CV, "So we have done the hard years over decades, all that. I wanted to be a fighter pilot. You can't, because you're a girl and you don't have the appendage that's required. You know, all of this nonsense that we had to put up with. So, for me, that this Reform Party is saying on day one, they would repeal the Equality act." CV, "And we all know what that means. So, you know, the protections against harassment of women in the workplace, the, equal pay, maternity leave, maternity pay, all of those. We're going to scrap all those. So it is indicative of the way in which this might go, as we've seen in America." JOB, "I think talking of ordinary men, the person who pushed back against him on social media was. It was a rather better model of masculinity." CV, "Yes, absolutely. So he's the author, Chris Ryan, who is a former SAS hero, a very successful author. Chris is his pen name. And, he absolutely defended me because he is a real man." CV, "He's not a pretend. He's a real guy and a guy who respects women." JOB, "I suppose, in some sense, the writing was on the wall with the leadership of reform who have not responded by the way, to, our, requests a, response to these allegations of misogyny, including the comments directed at you." JOB, "But when James McMurdoch Ended up in Parliament just after the last election, and, it quickly emerged that he'd been jailed for attacking a former girlfriend." CV, "Yes. And here is another example, a very serious example of, to me, reforms, excuses for things. So I think it was a Times newspaper fact he only got in with a majority of 98." CV, "So imagine if this information had been available beforehand about him. So, shortly after he was elected in 2024 as a Reform MP, I think it was a Times newspaper, found that he had been convicted and served time for, assaulting his girlfriend." CV, "He then said in his defense, oh, it was a push. Then the official court documents show that she was on the floor. He was kicking her multiple times while she was on the floor and had to be, dragged away by two security guards." CV, "Very different stories. Richard Tice then defends it, saying, oh, well, he's served his time. That was a long time ago. It doesn't matter. I am sorry. It matters. It matters to women. We know how much harassment online has increased and offline." CV, "So this is a time for all women to stand up and say, enough now, we are not going backwards." JOB, "I suppose one example is. It could be chalked up as accidental or carelessness. But two examples and emerging patterns speak of something altogether more sinister." CV, "Yes, well, Lee Anderson, bless him, when he was a Tory. That was after he was a Labour." JOB, "Yes." CV, "And now he's a Reform." JOB, "Correct. Well, at the time of this conversation, we'll have to check before we play it" CV, "out on the program tomorrow. Yeah, so he was, in the Conservative Party at the time and he was slinging insults to me all the time on Twitter in, the days when we used to be on Twitter. And, you know, obviously now he's reformed, he thinks it's perfectly acceptable." CV, "So there is a pattern there with this party. And, that is my concern that they will, if they get into, and they've stated it out in the open, we will repeal the Equality Act." JOB, "It's surprising to me when people like Danny Kruger talk about ordinary people. An ordinary man for an ordinary man." CV, "When he went to Eton." JOB, "Yeah. And, well, also his mother is on telly as well, so, you know, he or she at, at least will be aware of the misogyny that police. Yeah, yeah. You think that that might have given him a slightly more sensitive insight into what it's like for women like you. And, and you are tough. I mean, I don't mean that in a patronizing way." CV, "I take it as a compliment." JOB, "Good, I'm glad you do because you are perfectly capable of looking after yourself. A lot of women, both online and offline, are not, of course, and those are the kind of women that, misogynistic men prey on." CV, "But the thing is, I, I have a tough skin now because of all of the abuse over decades. And it. You know, I can remember when I wore a short skirt to the BAFTAs. I was age 39. Well, it was like I'd killed my grandmother the next day." CV, "It was the quest. Even the BBC made a whole Kilroy show about it. Flew this dress in copy dress from Paris. And, the question was, should a woman age 39 wear a dress above the knee? Jeez, I mean, that's my lifetime. This isn't Victorian days or my mother or post war." CV, "This is me in my lifetime. So, you know, as I go back to the beginning, women my age who love the fact that our daughters or nieces, or grandchildren have, can play football, you know, very happily can be applauded for what they do in sport." CV, "Can be. Oh, another thing that I'll, Kenyon said was that women can't referee, drive, take directions. And he had a go at various female sports presenters on the telly. You know, it's constant, it's consistent." JOB, "So they're not, they're not up to the job. They're only there to tick a box. And then declaring and From a political point of view, this is interesting actually stating I'm sexist. Sorry, but I am." CV, "Yeah." JOB, "And then the defense from reform UK becomes. These comments were made before he entered politics. He's perfectly entitled to his own personal opinions." CV, "That was three weeks ago." JOB, "Yeah, yeah. It's extraordinary that he can state that because Murdoch didn't get dropped by the party for the conviction for battering his ex, he got dropped after it emerged that he'd taken Covid loans out under the COVID support scheme. I think that's still ongoing." JOB, "But to state I am sexist, sorry, but I am in 2024 would have probably been a career ending revelation. Do you think? We're going a bit backwards, But I think we" CV, "have the potential to go backwards and we now, you know, generally you go, life's good. You know, doing this, that and the other. When I began my career as an engineer, funnily enough, not many women then were talking about having a career because not Many women have been to university and all of that." CV, "Now, thankfully, decades later, women are having careers. But also, housing was a lot cheaper then. So now we need to. You need, two incomes to fund a mortgage generally in this country." CV, "So the whole business of, oh, well, we're going to scrap the law that says about equal pay. That's going to affect people directly. And this is what I want people to understand, really. This is. This is not just about a woman getting on a high horse about something." CV, "This is very, very, very. Couldn't be more serious." JOB, "And, yeah, it is, of course, people like Nigel Farage and Sarah Potchin who claim that they're the party dedicated to protecting women and children. I mean, it's beyond irony. It emerged yesterday that one in five of the people arrested over the riots in 2024, which many people feel were fermented by Nigel Farage's social media activ." JOB, "Five of the people arrested over those riots have since been reported to the police for domestic abuse. So to simultaneously encourage and excuse the misogyny that's been directed at you and at other women while claiming. And, of course, to put a violent offender into Parliament and say that that's not an excluding offense while simultaneously claiming that they act for women and children is, It's beyond parody, isn't it?" CV, "And those same people who were arrested, there were almost 900 of them, weren't there? About the riots across the country at the time, 41% had already, been reported to the police for domestic abuse." JOB, "So who are the women and children they're dedicated to protecting?" CV, "Well, quite." JOB, "And who are they protecting them from?" CV, "None." JOB, "It's good to see you. I knew that you would be, perturbed by this, but." CV, "I am." JOB, "But enraged?" CV, "Yes, I am." JOB, "And are you expecting an apology? I know you've demanded." CV, "Well, I can't." JOB, "You did not demand anything." CV, "I can't demand anything. I have asked for an apology. Not for me." JOB, "No." CV, "But for all of us. And for his comments so far. I just think we're on day three. Nothing." JOB, "Not even a whisper nothing or a nothing." CV, "He's still running away. Hiding away from cameras, maybe." JOB, "Don't hold your breath, Carol. Thank you." CV, "Thanks, James." JOB, "Still waiting. I hope she didn't hold her breath. We got a statement from Reform Councillor Kenyon, made these comments before entering politics. We are confident that he is an excellent candidate who will be a superb local MP for Makerfield. And a full list of all the candidates running there can be found at lbc co uk"

Farrukh

24,754 次观看 • 2 个月前

My response to Rep. Ro Khanna's self-immolation in committee today: Ro Khanna owes the American people an apology. I've testified in 20 state capitols across the country. I've never seen a lawmaker embarrass himself like Ro Khanna did today. Ro is a leader of the most important committee for countering the Chinese Communist Party. Instead of dealing in substance and policy, he pulled out the race card in the most self-embarrassing way today while also peddling ridiculous conspiracy theories. The American people need real solutions to acute national security issues. Ro Khanna is burning up committee time on nonsense. Here's what happened: I testified today about how American state lawmakers are being threatened, harassed and attacked by Chinese state-tied actors. Our military installations are being closely surveilled. Chinese-Americans are being hunted down by CCP government agents. Critical infrastructure is being attacked. Rep. Khanna ignored all those threats, *including threats to fellow Democrats who are currently sitting state lawmakers.* Honestly, I'm shocked that it did not register with him that a Chinese company threatened a Democrat state official. Instead, Ro dug up a tweet where I criticized CCP birth tourism and tried to call me racist. Of course, he completely failed. I oppose birth tourism schemes through which CCP military and political leaders get U.S. citizenship for their children by giving birth in Saipan and then raising their children loyal to the CCP in China. It's completely crazy that we allow this. Peter Schweizer has documented this scandal in his recent book. This shouldn't be a partisan issue. And here's the context: Ro was angry that I criticized birth tourism as a part of my criticism of two Chinese-Americans who attempted to bomb MacDill Air Force Base earlier this year. According to Rep. Khanna, the bombers Alen Zheng (20) and his sister Ann Mary Zheng (27) achieved American citizenship through some sort of birthright program. It's unclear whether they were just born and raised here, or if they were a part of the Saipan scheme I criticized. But either way, Ro Khanna was lifting up and defending people who were basically terrorists who tried to bomb CENTCOM March 10th of this year. Then he turned around and claimed the real problem is racists who think birth tourism is a bad idea. Guess who thinks birth tourism is a bad idea? 75% of the American people according to a YouGov poll from last year: "The group Americans are least likely to say should automatically receive U.S. citizenship — of the nine asked about in the survey — is children born in the U.S. to parents who are tourists visiting the country. 25% of Americans, including 11% of Republicans and 41% of Democrats, think children born to tourists on American soil should automatically receive U.S. citizenship." Sorry 75% of Americans who have common sense. Rep. Ro Khanna thinks you're all racists! Furthermore, with the CCP, we are talking about cases where a child in simply born on a U.S. pacific island and then returns to China within days, never to see the USA again. Ro Khanna apparently thinks giving citizenship to all of these people is a great idea, even if they are completely loyal to the CCP, absolutely hate the USA, and have never stepped foot in our country. To me and to practically anyone with common sense who analyzes the CCP, this is an obvious vector for CCP grey-zone political warfare. For example, imagine 1,500,000 CCP loyalists raised entirely in China voting across swing states in our elections. Nonetheless, Ro Khanna went on a rant to claim that I'm an anti-Chinese racist because I oppose this obviously ridiculous birth tourism scheme. Now here's where Ro really jumped the shark. In his rush to conjure up a triple bank-shot conspiracy theory to try to claim I'm a racist, he apparently didn't do any homework to find out anything about me. I'm married to an immigrant from China who became an American citizen in 2019. We have 4 wonderful children who are, of course, half Chinese by ethnicity. Ro was ranting at the dais claiming I'm racist against my own family simply because I oppose all the various schemes of the genocidal Chinese Communist Party, and I hold a position on birth tourism shared by 75% of the American people. And I bet it would be way higher than 75% if the question was focused on the CCP Saipan scheme. As I told Ro in committee, calling someone an anti-Chinese racist for opposing the CCP is like calling someone an anti-Italian racist for opposing the mafia. Both examples are absurd. Embarrassingly so. The American people need real leaders and real national security solutions from both federal and state governments. That's what we work on every day at State Armor. We don't need Rep. Ro Khanna wasting time be-clowning himself in committee when there is so much real work that needs to be done. Ro insulted me and my family today. But honestly, I don't know anyone who puts any value in what Ro says. So that doesn't really matter. Today's self-embarrassment was just one more part of Ro's ongoing self-immolation that includes endorsing Nazi-sympathetic candidates, claiming Elon Musk killed millions of kids, and being one of the most prolific stock traders in Congress. And that's just in the last few weeks. But here's what matters: Ro Khanna is an elected official who is tasked with dealing with our most urgent national security issues, like those I brought before him and the Select Committee on China committee today. And instead of engaging in a real policy discussion, he destroyed our ability to work together on real solutions to counter the attacks by the Chinese Communist Party. For that, he owes the American people an apology.

My response to Rep. Ro Khanna's self-immolation in committee today: Ro Khanna owes the American people an apology. I've testified in 20 state capitols across the country. I've never seen a lawmaker embarrass himself like Ro Khanna did today. Ro is a leader of the most important committee for countering the Chinese Communist Party. Instead of dealing in substance and policy, he pulled out the race card in the most self-embarrassing way today while also peddling ridiculous conspiracy theories. The American people need real solutions to acute national security issues. Ro Khanna is burning up committee time on nonsense. Here's what happened: I testified today about how American state lawmakers are being threatened, harassed and attacked by Chinese state-tied actors. Our military installations are being closely surveilled. Chinese-Americans are being hunted down by CCP government agents. Critical infrastructure is being attacked. Rep. Khanna ignored all those threats, including threats to fellow Democrats who are currently sitting state lawmakers. Honestly, I'm shocked that it did not register with him that a Chinese company threatened a Democrat state official. Instead, Ro dug up a tweet where I criticized CCP birth tourism and tried to call me racist. Of course, he completely failed. I oppose birth tourism schemes through which CCP military and political leaders get U.S. citizenship for their children by giving birth in Saipan and then raising their children loyal to the CCP in China. It's completely crazy that we allow this. Peter Schweizer has documented this scandal in his recent book. This shouldn't be a partisan issue. And here's the context: Ro was angry that I criticized birth tourism as a part of my criticism of two Chinese-Americans who attempted to bomb MacDill Air Force Base earlier this year. According to Rep. Khanna, the bombers Alen Zheng (20) and his sister Ann Mary Zheng (27) achieved American citizenship through some sort of birthright program. It's unclear whether they were just born and raised here, or if they were a part of the Saipan scheme I criticized. But either way, Ro Khanna was lifting up and defending people who were basically terrorists who tried to bomb CENTCOM March 10th of this year. Then he turned around and claimed the real problem is racists who think birth tourism is a bad idea. Guess who thinks birth tourism is a bad idea? 75% of the American people according to a YouGov poll from last year: "The group Americans are least likely to say should automatically receive U.S. citizenship — of the nine asked about in the survey — is children born in the U.S. to parents who are tourists visiting the country. 25% of Americans, including 11% of Republicans and 41% of Democrats, think children born to tourists on American soil should automatically receive U.S. citizenship." Sorry 75% of Americans who have common sense. Rep. Ro Khanna thinks you're all racists! Furthermore, with the CCP, we are talking about cases where a child in simply born on a U.S. pacific island and then returns to China within days, never to see the USA again. Ro Khanna apparently thinks giving citizenship to all of these people is a great idea, even if they are completely loyal to the CCP, absolutely hate the USA, and have never stepped foot in our country. To me and to practically anyone with common sense who analyzes the CCP, this is an obvious vector for CCP grey-zone political warfare. For example, imagine 1,500,000 CCP loyalists raised entirely in China voting across swing states in our elections. Nonetheless, Ro Khanna went on a rant to claim that I'm an anti-Chinese racist because I oppose this obviously ridiculous birth tourism scheme. Now here's where Ro really jumped the shark. In his rush to conjure up a triple bank-shot conspiracy theory to try to claim I'm a racist, he apparently didn't do any homework to find out anything about me. I'm married to an immigrant from China who became an American citizen in 2019. We have 4 wonderful children who are, of course, half Chinese by ethnicity. Ro was ranting at the dais claiming I'm racist against my own family simply because I oppose all the various schemes of the genocidal Chinese Communist Party, and I hold a position on birth tourism shared by 75% of the American people. And I bet it would be way higher than 75% if the question was focused on the CCP Saipan scheme. As I told Ro in committee, calling someone an anti-Chinese racist for opposing the CCP is like calling someone an anti-Italian racist for opposing the mafia. Both examples are absurd. Embarrassingly so. The American people need real leaders and real national security solutions from both federal and state governments. That's what we work on every day at State Armor. We don't need Rep. Ro Khanna wasting time be-clowning himself in committee when there is so much real work that needs to be done. Ro insulted me and my family today. But honestly, I don't know anyone who puts any value in what Ro says. So that doesn't really matter. Today's self-embarrassment was just one more part of Ro's ongoing self-immolation that includes endorsing Nazi-sympathetic candidates, claiming Elon Musk killed millions of kids, and being one of the most prolific stock traders in Congress. And that's just in the last few weeks. But here's what matters: Ro Khanna is an elected official who is tasked with dealing with our most urgent national security issues, like those I brought before him and the Select Committee on China committee today. And instead of engaging in a real policy discussion, he destroyed our ability to work together on real solutions to counter the attacks by the Chinese Communist Party. For that, he owes the American people an apology.

Michael Lucci

187,227 次观看 • 1 个月前

When Shabana Mahmood, the Muslim appointed as Home Secretary of the United Kingdom, reads the Quran, which, as she testifies in this video, shapes her worldview and way of life, this is what the Quran commands her to follow and what she is committed to upholding. I’ve prepared a concise booklet’s worth of material for you, so you can understand what lies ahead. If you wish to delve deeper, you have the key points here. (The document contains about 4,000 words) ⬇️ The Prophet said: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah, (Allah) be glorified and exalted". (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih. Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539 Sahih) 1. Islamic Art of War By: Ofer Binshtok Islam wages a continuous global war through various methods and with varying intensity against non-Muslims 24/7, as commanded by the Quran and Muhammad, a war that has persisted for approximately 1400 years and will continue indefinitely. In places where non-Muslims grow weary of conflict and seek peace, avoiding confrontation and attempting to appease Islam, believing they have achieved tranquility through signing agreements with Islam and even allowing its migration into their territories, during this time, Islam builds its strength and attacks them when it senses it has the upper hand, from within and from outside, in the most brutal way possible. This war strategy relies on the Islamic Art of War, based on the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. Quran 8:39 - The goal: a world containing only Muslims through war. Quran 98:6 - Demonization of non-Muslims. Quran 3:28 - Deceive non-Muslims. Quran 47:35 - Do not seek peace when you have the upper hand. In other words, attack. Quran 8:60 - During a hudna (ceasefire), Islam prepares for war. Quran 9:123 - Attack nearby non-Muslims. Quran 9:5 - Kill every non-Muslim in the world. In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to the settlement of Medina (Yathrib) in the Arabian Peninsula, where he was received as a refugee by the Jews who had established and controlled the prosperous region, granting him shelter. Within approximately eight years, after building his strength, Muhammad eliminated the presence of Jews and other non-Muslims in the area. In 628 AD, Muhammad signed a ten-year hudna (truce) agreement in Hudaibiya with the Quraysh tribe of Mecca, as his forces were weaker than theirs. In 630 AD, when his power was sufficiently strong, he violated the agreement with the Quraysh, attacked Mecca, conquered it with ease, and eradicated all other cultures present there. Muhammad's Sunnah, which is binding in Islam according to Quran 33:21, commands every Muslim to emulate all of Muhammad’s words and deeds, which are considered sacred. "A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it. The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran. Quran 5.51: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyâ’), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." "Because Muhammad admitted to using terrorism, committing an act of terrorism is considered as a holy deed in Islam." (122) CHAPTER. The statement of the Prophet: I have been made victorious for a distance of one month journey with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy). The Statement of Allah: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve...(V.3:151) Sahih Al-B ukhari\ translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan.- Riyadh. Volume 4. (122) CHAPTER. (56 - THE BOOK OF JIHAD) (Fighting for Allah's Cause) Page – 140. Hadith 2977 - Narrated AbU Hurairah: Allah's Messenger A said: "....and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)... Sahih Al-B ukhari\ translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan.- Riyadh. Volume 4. (122) CHAPTER. (56 - THE BOOK OF JIHAD) (Fighting for Allah's Cause) Page – 140. Quran 68.4 And indeed, you are (Muhammad) of a great moral character. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." "When a Muslim looks at a non-Muslim, the Quran creates a lens for him through which he sees and understands the non-Muslim, composed of these three verses (and there are many more):" 8:55, 98:6, and 9:28. Verses 8:55 and 98:6 portray non-Muslims as the worst creatures, even worse than cockroaches, bedbugs, and ticks. Verse 9:28 portrays non-Muslims as physically and spiritually filthy, akin to the filth of excrement. In summary: When a Muslim looks at a non-Muslim, he sees him through the lens of the Quran as the worst creatures, worse than cockroaches and ticks, and physically and spiritually filthy to the level of excrement. Quran 8.55 “Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve, - so they shall not believe.” Quran 98.6: "Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." Quran 9.28: “O you who believe (in Allâh’s Oneness and in His Messenger Muhammad!) Verily, the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, and in the Message of Muhammad) are Najasun (impure). [1] So let them not come near Al-Masjidal-Harâm (at Makkah) after this year; and if you fear poverty, Allâh will enrich you if He wills, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allâh is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” (V.9:28) Their impurity is spiritual and physical: spiritual, because they don’t believe in Allâh’s Oneness and in His Prophet Muhammad; and physical, because they lack personal hygiene (filthy as regards urine, stools and blood). And the word Najas is used only for those persons who have spiritual impurity e.g. Al-Mushrikûn. Quran 9.14 "Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder." "The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law." By: Ofer binshtok. 09.0 JIHAD (0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad." The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as: (1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216); (2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89); (3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran 9:36); and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: "I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah"; and the hadith reported by Muslim, "To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it." Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD 09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace), "He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad," and Allah Most High having said: "Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95). If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims. The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can). 09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force). 09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible). Source: Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law 'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices. Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. 2. Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' The Islamic principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' (loyalty and disavowal) forms a cornerstone of the declaration of faith, shaping a Muslim’s relationships and actions. Wala' (loyalty) arises from love for Allah, driving believers to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This loyalty manifests in tangible acts, such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment to Allah. Conversely, bara' (disavowal) stems from rejection of disbelief, leading to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds, as evidenced by numerous references in the Qur'an and Sunnah. The Qur'an provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to believers and dissociation from disbelievers. It warns Muslims against prioritizing alliances with disbelievers over fellow believers, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Qur'an 3:28 - Taqiyya). It emphasizes that true love for Allah is shown by following Muhammad, which earns divine love and forgiveness, while turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Qur'an 3:31-32). The Qur'an further cautions against befriending those who desire Muslims to abandon their faith, urging believers to avoid such ties unless the disbelievers embrace Allah’s path (Qur'an 4:89). It explicitly advises against taking Jews and Christians as intimate allies, noting that those who do so align themselves with their ranks and stray from divine guidance (Qur'an 5:51). Additionally, it praises those whom Allah loves and who love Him, demonstrating humility toward believers, firmness against disbelievers, and steadfast dedication to striving for Allah’s cause without fear of criticism (Qur'an 5:54). Further reinforcing this principle, the Qur'an instructs believers not to take disbelievers as allies when they oppose Allah and Muhammad, even if they are close relatives, warning that such alliances betray the faith (Qur'an 60:1). It also prohibits taking disbelievers as protectors in preference to believers, stating that those who do so will find no help from Allah (Qur'an 4:144). Moreover, it commands Muslims not to prioritize familial ties with disbelieving parents or siblings over their faith, emphasizing that true believers are those who align solely with Allah, Muhammad, and the faithful (Qur'an 9:23). The Qur'an also describes true believers as those who do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah and Muhammad, even if they are close kin, as Allah strengthens their hearts with faith and promises them divine reward (Qur'an 58:22). Finally, the example of Prophet Ibrahim is highlighted, who declared to his people, “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone” (Qur'an 60:4), illustrating the resolute stance required in disavowing disbelief. The Sunnah further clarifies these teachings. Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims and refrain from forming close bonds with disbelievers. He reportedly said, “The strongest bond of faith is love for the sake of Allah and enmity for His sake.” Another narration emphasizes that true faith is achieved only through loving and opposing for Allah’s sake, forming alliances with believers and standing against disbelievers. A scholar explained that wala' entails not just affection but active solidarity, including defending Muslims, upholding their honor, and supporting them in times of need, such as during conflicts or hardships. Similarly, bara' requires concrete opposition, such as openly rejecting false ideologies, avoiding cooperation with those who oppose Islam, and, when necessary, confronting them through intellectual or physical struggle, as exemplified by Ibrahim’s rejection of idolatry (Qur'an 60:4). This principle underscores that loyalty to Allah involves loving and aiding His obedient followers, whether through charity, protection, or advocacy, while disavowal requires opposing His enemies with determination, such as by refuting their arguments or resisting their influence. The Qur'an distinguishes between the “party of Allah,” who are guided from darkness to light, and the “party of Satan,” who lead others into darkness (Qur'an 2:257). It describes believers as striving for Allah’s cause, while disbelievers fight for falsehood, urging Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, whose strategies are ultimately weak (Qur'an 4:76). Every prophet faced adversaries, human or jinn, who used deceptive rhetoric to mislead, yet Allah assures victory to His followers in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Qur'an 6:112, 37:173). The enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, or proponents of ideologies that contradict divine teachings, seek to erode Muslim faith and identity. They may promote deceptive concepts like universal brotherhood or the separation of religion from public life, aiming to weaken the Muslim community’s distinct character. For example, calls for “equality” that ignore religious differences or attempts to dilute Islamic values under the guise of modernity directly challenge Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. Muslims must equip themselves with deep knowledge of their faith to counter these threats, using the Qur'an and Sunnah as tools to defend their beliefs. The declaration of faith demands unwavering devotion to Allah, loving what He loves, such as justice, piety, and unity among believers, and hating what He hates, such as disbelief, oppression, and hypocrisy. This commitment requires aligning exclusively with Muslims, supporting them in times of need, and opposing disbelievers, even if they are close relatives, as emphasized by scholars like Ibn Taymiyya. By embodying Al-Wala' Wal-Bara', Muslims ensure their actions and relationships reflect their submission to Allah, safeguarding their faith against external challenges. 3. Never, ever try to learn about Islam from Muslims. They will always lie to you, because this is part of their holy war against heresy and disbelievers. Don’t pay attention to a word that comes out of their mouth about Islam. By: Ofer Binshtok Do you really believe that if you ask Muslims whether Islam is a religion of violence, war, and terrorism, they will respond with a resounding "Yes"? Even if it is true? Do you believe they will acknowledge the truth? Does it make sense to ask them such a question? "Critical thinking means being able to make compelling arguments. Arguments consist of claims substantiated by evidence-supported reasons. Argumentation is a social process of two or more people making arguments, responding to one another—not simply restating the same claims and reasons—and modifying or defending their positions accordingly." "Islam's holy culture of lies and deception" "The claim" is that it is forbidden to attempt to learn and understand from Muslims about the eternal war they are ordered to wage against us, the heresy and disbelievers, through terror and various means, as they will always continue to lie to us on this subject. They will always continue to lie to us as a holy command from Allah in the Quran and Muhammad. For them it is a sacred commandment to lie to us as part of the jihad war that Islam is waging against us. “The argument” “Islam is in eternal state of war againt the heresy and the disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected. "In fact, from the verses above, along with many hadiths, it can be understood that believers, as commanded by Allah in the Quran and by Muhammad, are in a perpetual state of war against heresy and disbelievers 24/7/365, for approximately 1,400 years and indefinitely." And then: “It is permissible to lie in a state of war, as a tool of war.” Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." In conclusion: we can learn from this argument that it is incorrect to attempt to learn from Muslims about the eternal war they are ordered to wage against us, the disbelievers, because they are actually commanded to lie to us and deceive us as part of the ongoing war of extermination that they are ordered to wage against us.

When Shabana Mahmood, the Muslim appointed as Home Secretary of the United Kingdom, reads the Quran, which, as she testifies in this video, shapes her worldview and way of life, this is what the Quran commands her to follow and what she is committed to upholding. I’ve prepared a concise booklet’s worth of material for you, so you can understand what lies ahead. If you wish to delve deeper, you have the key points here. (The document contains about 4,000 words) ⬇️ The Prophet said: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah, (Allah) be glorified and exalted". (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih. Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539 Sahih) 1. Islamic Art of War By: Ofer Binshtok Islam wages a continuous global war through various methods and with varying intensity against non-Muslims 24/7, as commanded by the Quran and Muhammad, a war that has persisted for approximately 1400 years and will continue indefinitely. In places where non-Muslims grow weary of conflict and seek peace, avoiding confrontation and attempting to appease Islam, believing they have achieved tranquility through signing agreements with Islam and even allowing its migration into their territories, during this time, Islam builds its strength and attacks them when it senses it has the upper hand, from within and from outside, in the most brutal way possible. This war strategy relies on the Islamic Art of War, based on the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. Quran 8:39 - The goal: a world containing only Muslims through war. Quran 98:6 - Demonization of non-Muslims. Quran 3:28 - Deceive non-Muslims. Quran 47:35 - Do not seek peace when you have the upper hand. In other words, attack. Quran 8:60 - During a hudna (ceasefire), Islam prepares for war. Quran 9:123 - Attack nearby non-Muslims. Quran 9:5 - Kill every non-Muslim in the world. In 622 AD, Muhammad migrated from Mecca to the settlement of Medina (Yathrib) in the Arabian Peninsula, where he was received as a refugee by the Jews who had established and controlled the prosperous region, granting him shelter. Within approximately eight years, after building his strength, Muhammad eliminated the presence of Jews and other non-Muslims in the area. In 628 AD, Muhammad signed a ten-year hudna (truce) agreement in Hudaibiya with the Quraysh tribe of Mecca, as his forces were weaker than theirs. In 630 AD, when his power was sufficiently strong, he violated the agreement with the Quraysh, attacked Mecca, conquered it with ease, and eradicated all other cultures present there. Muhammad's Sunnah, which is binding in Islam according to Quran 33:21, commands every Muslim to emulate all of Muhammad’s words and deeds, which are considered sacred. "A Muslim must be loyal only to the Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic Ummah, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic Ummah. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and Muhammad's Sunnah. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic Ummah. A Ummah that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic Ummah, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic Ummah will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic Ummah will replace it. The fact that the idea of Ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Quran. Quran 5.51: "O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers), they are but Auliyâ’ of each other. And if any amongst you takes them (as Auliyâ’), then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust)." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." "Because Muhammad admitted to using terrorism, committing an act of terrorism is considered as a holy deed in Islam." (122) CHAPTER. The statement of the Prophet: I have been made victorious for a distance of one month journey with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy). The Statement of Allah: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve...(V.3:151) Sahih Al-B ukhari\ translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan.- Riyadh. Volume 4. (122) CHAPTER. (56 - THE BOOK OF JIHAD) (Fighting for Allah's Cause) Page – 140. Hadith 2977 - Narrated AbU Hurairah: Allah's Messenger A said: "....and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)... Sahih Al-B ukhari\ translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan.- Riyadh. Volume 4. (122) CHAPTER. (56 - THE BOOK OF JIHAD) (Fighting for Allah's Cause) Page – 140. Quran 68.4 And indeed, you are (Muhammad) of a great moral character. Quran 33.21 "Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم you have a good example to follow for him who hopes for (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day, and remembers Allâh much." "When a Muslim looks at a non-Muslim, the Quran creates a lens for him through which he sees and understands the non-Muslim, composed of these three verses (and there are many more):" 8:55, 98:6, and 9:28. Verses 8:55 and 98:6 portray non-Muslims as the worst creatures, even worse than cockroaches, bedbugs, and ticks. Verse 9:28 portrays non-Muslims as physically and spiritually filthy, akin to the filth of excrement. In summary: When a Muslim looks at a non-Muslim, he sees him through the lens of the Quran as the worst creatures, worse than cockroaches and ticks, and physically and spiritually filthy to the level of excrement. Quran 8.55 “Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve, - so they shall not believe.” Quran 98.6: "Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." Quran 9.28: “O you who believe (in Allâh’s Oneness and in His Messenger Muhammad!) Verily, the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh, and in the Message of Muhammad) are Najasun (impure). [1] So let them not come near Al-Masjidal-Harâm (at Makkah) after this year; and if you fear poverty, Allâh will enrich you if He wills, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allâh is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” (V.9:28) Their impurity is spiritual and physical: spiritual, because they don’t believe in Allâh’s Oneness and in His Prophet Muhammad; and physical, because they lack personal hygiene (filthy as regards urine, stools and blood). And the word Najas is used only for those persons who have spiritual impurity e.g. Al-Mushrikûn. Quran 9.14 "Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Quran 8.39: "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5: “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191: "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder." "The concept of Jihad as defined by Sharia law." By: Ofer binshtok. 09.0 JIHAD (0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad." The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as: (1) "Fighting is prescribed for you" (Koran 2:216); (2) "Slay them wherever you find them" (Koran 4:89); (3) "Fight the idolators utterly" (Koran 9:36); and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said: "I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah"; and the hadith reported by Muslim, "To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it." Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight. himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) THE OBLIGATORY CHARACTER OF JIHAD 09.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others (0: the evidence for which is the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace), "He who provides the equipment for a soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad," and Allah Most High having said: "Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah's path with their property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to each. Allah has promised great good" (Koran 4:95). If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims. The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: 09.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, "Jihad is a communal obligation," meaning upon the Muslims each year. The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can). 09.2 jihad is personally obligatory upon all 'those present in the battle lines (A: and to flee is an enormity (dis: pH)) (0: provided one is able to fight. If unable, because of illness or the death of one's mount when not able to fight on foot, or because one no longer has a weapon, then one may leave. One may also leave if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force). 09.3 Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means. All of which is if conditions permit gathering (A: the above-mentioned) people, provisioning them, and readying them for war. If conditions do not permit this, as when the enemy has overrun the Muslims such that they are unable to provision or prepare themselves for war, then whoever is found by a non-Muslim and knows he will be killed if captured is obliged to defend himself in whatever way possible. But if not certain that he will be killed, meaning that he might or might not be, as when he might merely be taken captive, and he knows he will be killed if he does not surrender, then he may either surrender or fight. A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to lin indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible). Source: Reliance of the Traveller - Revised Edition. The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law 'Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices. Edited and Translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. 2. Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' The Islamic principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' (loyalty and disavowal) forms a cornerstone of the declaration of faith, shaping a Muslim’s relationships and actions. Wala' (loyalty) arises from love for Allah, driving believers to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This loyalty manifests in tangible acts, such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment to Allah. Conversely, bara' (disavowal) stems from rejection of disbelief, leading to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds, as evidenced by numerous references in the Qur'an and Sunnah. The Qur'an provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to believers and dissociation from disbelievers. It warns Muslims against prioritizing alliances with disbelievers over fellow believers, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Qur'an 3:28 - Taqiyya). It emphasizes that true love for Allah is shown by following Muhammad, which earns divine love and forgiveness, while turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Qur'an 3:31-32). The Qur'an further cautions against befriending those who desire Muslims to abandon their faith, urging believers to avoid such ties unless the disbelievers embrace Allah’s path (Qur'an 4:89). It explicitly advises against taking Jews and Christians as intimate allies, noting that those who do so align themselves with their ranks and stray from divine guidance (Qur'an 5:51). Additionally, it praises those whom Allah loves and who love Him, demonstrating humility toward believers, firmness against disbelievers, and steadfast dedication to striving for Allah’s cause without fear of criticism (Qur'an 5:54). Further reinforcing this principle, the Qur'an instructs believers not to take disbelievers as allies when they oppose Allah and Muhammad, even if they are close relatives, warning that such alliances betray the faith (Qur'an 60:1). It also prohibits taking disbelievers as protectors in preference to believers, stating that those who do so will find no help from Allah (Qur'an 4:144). Moreover, it commands Muslims not to prioritize familial ties with disbelieving parents or siblings over their faith, emphasizing that true believers are those who align solely with Allah, Muhammad, and the faithful (Qur'an 9:23). The Qur'an also describes true believers as those who do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah and Muhammad, even if they are close kin, as Allah strengthens their hearts with faith and promises them divine reward (Qur'an 58:22). Finally, the example of Prophet Ibrahim is highlighted, who declared to his people, “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone” (Qur'an 60:4), illustrating the resolute stance required in disavowing disbelief. The Sunnah further clarifies these teachings. Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims and refrain from forming close bonds with disbelievers. He reportedly said, “The strongest bond of faith is love for the sake of Allah and enmity for His sake.” Another narration emphasizes that true faith is achieved only through loving and opposing for Allah’s sake, forming alliances with believers and standing against disbelievers. A scholar explained that wala' entails not just affection but active solidarity, including defending Muslims, upholding their honor, and supporting them in times of need, such as during conflicts or hardships. Similarly, bara' requires concrete opposition, such as openly rejecting false ideologies, avoiding cooperation with those who oppose Islam, and, when necessary, confronting them through intellectual or physical struggle, as exemplified by Ibrahim’s rejection of idolatry (Qur'an 60:4). This principle underscores that loyalty to Allah involves loving and aiding His obedient followers, whether through charity, protection, or advocacy, while disavowal requires opposing His enemies with determination, such as by refuting their arguments or resisting their influence. The Qur'an distinguishes between the “party of Allah,” who are guided from darkness to light, and the “party of Satan,” who lead others into darkness (Qur'an 2:257). It describes believers as striving for Allah’s cause, while disbelievers fight for falsehood, urging Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, whose strategies are ultimately weak (Qur'an 4:76). Every prophet faced adversaries, human or jinn, who used deceptive rhetoric to mislead, yet Allah assures victory to His followers in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Qur'an 6:112, 37:173). The enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, or proponents of ideologies that contradict divine teachings, seek to erode Muslim faith and identity. They may promote deceptive concepts like universal brotherhood or the separation of religion from public life, aiming to weaken the Muslim community’s distinct character. For example, calls for “equality” that ignore religious differences or attempts to dilute Islamic values under the guise of modernity directly challenge Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. Muslims must equip themselves with deep knowledge of their faith to counter these threats, using the Qur'an and Sunnah as tools to defend their beliefs. The declaration of faith demands unwavering devotion to Allah, loving what He loves, such as justice, piety, and unity among believers, and hating what He hates, such as disbelief, oppression, and hypocrisy. This commitment requires aligning exclusively with Muslims, supporting them in times of need, and opposing disbelievers, even if they are close relatives, as emphasized by scholars like Ibn Taymiyya. By embodying Al-Wala' Wal-Bara', Muslims ensure their actions and relationships reflect their submission to Allah, safeguarding their faith against external challenges. 3. Never, ever try to learn about Islam from Muslims. They will always lie to you, because this is part of their holy war against heresy and disbelievers. Don’t pay attention to a word that comes out of their mouth about Islam. By: Ofer Binshtok Do you really believe that if you ask Muslims whether Islam is a religion of violence, war, and terrorism, they will respond with a resounding "Yes"? Even if it is true? Do you believe they will acknowledge the truth? Does it make sense to ask them such a question? "Critical thinking means being able to make compelling arguments. Arguments consist of claims substantiated by evidence-supported reasons. Argumentation is a social process of two or more people making arguments, responding to one another—not simply restating the same claims and reasons—and modifying or defending their positions accordingly." "Islam's holy culture of lies and deception" "The claim" is that it is forbidden to attempt to learn and understand from Muslims about the eternal war they are ordered to wage against us, the heresy and disbelievers, through terror and various means, as they will always continue to lie to us on this subject. They will always continue to lie to us as a holy command from Allah in the Quran and Muhammad. For them it is a sacred commandment to lie to us as part of the jihad war that Islam is waging against us. “The argument” “Islam is in eternal state of war againt the heresy and the disbelievers”. Quran 9.29 begins with: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah...” The message is also from Quran 8.39 Fight the disbelievers until only Islam will exists in the world. Quran 9.123 begins with: "O you who believe, fight those disbelievers who are near you..." The message is also from Hadith Bukhari 25: Fight the disbelievers until they all convert to Islam and only then will their lives and property be protected. "In fact, from the verses above, along with many hadiths, it can be understood that believers, as commanded by Allah in the Quran and by Muhammad, are in a perpetual state of war against heresy and disbelievers 24/7/365, for approximately 1,400 years and indefinitely." And then: “It is permissible to lie in a state of war, as a tool of war.” Muhammad in Bukhari hadith 3029: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called,: "War is deceit". Muhammad in Hadith Sahih, in Tirmidhi 1939: “Lying in time of war”. The message from Quran 3.28: Permission to lie to disbelievers as a defense, when Islam is in a state of weakness. Taqiyya. The message from Quran 16.106: "...Whoever disbelieves in [i.e., denies] Allāh after his belief...except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith..." In conclusion: we can learn from this argument that it is incorrect to attempt to learn from Muslims about the eternal war they are ordered to wage against us, the disbelievers, because they are actually commanded to lie to us and deceive us as part of the ongoing war of extermination that they are ordered to wage against us.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

197,351 次观看 • 11 个月前

The District Attorney race in Travis County/Greater Austin is among the most important this cycle. Everyone able should vote by March 5th. Watch this video and read the following to understand why – and share with others. I don’t like to get directly involved in politics, and prefer to stick to building social enterprises that bring people together (i.e., KIND Snacks, Builders, SOMOS Foods, Empatico ), but the stakes are so high for Austin that I feel the need to share some facts: Austin is facing a rampant rise in crime. All the data demonstrates it. And all of Jose Garza’s policies point to it. Some specific examples: • Garza let Santos Celso-Flores, who was awaiting trial for participating in the gang rape of 13-year-old girl, out on a $40 bond. While out on bond, Celso-Flores molested two more young girls. • Hilario Adrian’s bond was lowered to just $1 after Garza failed to bring his aggravated assault case to a grand jury in time. Shortly after his release, he brutally attacked an innocent bystander in downtown Austin, stabbing him to death. • Richard Williams brutally raped his ex-girlfriend at knifepoint for two hours while strangling and beating her. Garza cut a deferred adjudication plea deal with Williams, meaning he was released after just 90 days in prison without anything on his record. • Garza released Dedreuain Reese, who had been charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for pistol-whipping a woman, on a personal recognizance bond. Just weeks after he was released on bond, Reese committed a murder at the same house where he pistol whipped the woman. Friends have been telling me about the rise in crime in Austin. A family who lived downtown had their home burglarized. Another was held up. A friend who leads the Public Safety Commission shared the above examples. I assumed these were isolated cases and initially dismissed the issue. Eventually I did dozens of hours of research. The data is staggering: • 127% increase in the murder rate since Garza took over! • Car jackings more than doubled! • Convictions are down 61%! • Zero Jury Trials by Garza since he took over as DA! How is Garza responsible for this? Some examples: • When he took office, Garza abolished the DA division that sorted out cases. As a result, today there are over seven thousand unindicted felony crimes! Not 7. Not 70. Not 700. Seven THOUSAND pending cases that the DA’s office has failed to process. • In 2021, Garza released a bail reform plan that explicitly included releasing people on bail for just $1. Since then, Travis County has been plagued by crimes committed by people out on bonds. • Over 75 (out of a professional staff of around 95) experienced prosecutors have left the DA's Office since Garza took over in 2021. He has hired inexperienced and untested lawyers to handle the most serious and complicated cases in Travis County. • Here is testimony from a Mother whose children were sexually assaulted: These are not theoretical issues. And the people they affect are the most vulnerable members of our society. • Lynn Isaak survived a brutal attack while running in Travis Heights. She solved her own case through Nextdoor, trusted the DA's Office with the prosecution, and was then shocked when her attacker got probation with no jail time and no electronic monitoring. • Lashonda Lemons was beaten so badly by her partner that she lost her baby. The DA's Office got the case and lowered the charge from aggravated assault to a lesser offense and gave him deferred adjudication - a punishment that allows the offender to walk away without a conviction. This was all done over Lemons' objection. There is hope on the horizon: Jeremy Sylestine is a lifelong Democrat running in the Democratic Primary for Travis District Attorney. He is Native American member of the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. He went to UT, served as a Public Defender, and then for 15 years as a highly respected member of the DA’s office in Travis County. Meet Jeremy: He is among the highest integrity people you can meet. He is sacrificing a very good job and risking a lot for the sake of Austin and Travis County. Jeremy is compassionate, but he understands the duty to protect the most vulnerable members of our community from violent criminals. It’s quite a contrast: It took me months to understand why, in contrast, Jose Garza would allow a violent criminal who drugged and raped a 13 year old girl to get off without anything on his record. Why would he plea down everything to misdemeanor, including when a violent felon beat his pregnant girlfriend so brutally that she lost her baby? Even the most kindhearted also want justice and public safety. But Garza has a radical ideology that ANY prosecution ever is evil. When he was a public defender, that position was acceptable. But as DA in charge of enforcing the law, he is subverting his duties and violating his oath. Under Garza’s simplistic ideology, everyone is a victim or an oppressor based on their background and position in society rather than based on their actions and behavior. For Garza, the criminals that commit violent crimes are the victims so even if they committed rape or murder they cannot be at fault. It’s the system’s fault. For Garza, the DA’s office he presides over is the oppressor and so he is slowly dismantling it (not just reform it, but dismantling it, which is why he disbanded the division that processes cases, resulting in over seven thousand unindicted criminal felonies thus far). It’s so extreme it’s illogical. But that is what radical extremism does. In terms of financial backing, virtually all support for Jeremy comes from people that live in Travis County. Garza came into power with $1 million from out of state money. The people that put Garza in power do not need to live with the consequences of his actions. Jeremy’s supporters are locals whose families and loved ones live in Travis County. Our only agenda is to protect the community. For us teachers, entrepreneurs and parents it’s uncomfortable to get drawn into politically divisive issues. But the stakes are so high that everyone is stepping in. It’s very unusual for other elected politicians to stand up against an incumbent from their party. The amount of Democratic leaders that I’ve met and have told me how much they dislike Garza but can’t speak up is stunning. And even then, you have icons of the Democratic establishment speaking up: • David Butts and Alfred Stanley are among the most highly respected Austinites and life-long liberals helping Jeremy’s campaign. • Former Austin City Councilwoman Ora Houston, former Travis County Commissioner Karen Huber, as well as the Austin Bar Association Preference Poll, the South Asian Bar Association of Austin, and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas have all endorsed Jeremy. • Even former State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos & Travis County Commissioner Margaret Gomez, fellow Hispanics, are so shocked by Jose Garza’s actions and so impressed with Jeremy’s integrity that they have endorsed Jeremy Sylestine. Extremism seems to be taking over our country. But the proper response to rigidity and dehumanization from one side is not denial of facts and “us vs them” dehumanization from the opposite extreme. Personally, I identify as independent because I find political parties hyperpartisan. I support moderate candidates on both sides. It’s high time for builders to transcend these labels and all join together. It doesn’t matter if you are Democrat or Independent or Republican. You are a human being. You are a citizen. When it comes to public safety, it’s not about politics.Your children should be able to walk downtown without fear for their safety. Your spouse should be able to go for a run in the park without fear of being assaulted or raped. It’s about enforcing the law to protect victims while showing compassion wherever justice guides us to. It’s about all of us being together to BUILD a better community for all. Everyone in Travis County should go out and vote for Jeremy - not just to keep our community safe - but to break the shackles of extremism from either side and show that the people in Austin are ONE and refuse to play divisive games from extremist ideological politicians from either side. Regardless of political affiliation, anyone in #TravisCounty / Greater #AustinTx can go into a voting location, request a #DemocraticPrimary Ballot, and vote for #JeremySylestine in the most consequential election to the community. Where and How to Vote: Vote for @Jeremy4DA during Early Voting today through March 1 or on Election Day March 5.

The District Attorney race in Travis County/Greater Austin is among the most important this cycle. Everyone able should vote by March 5th. Watch this video and read the following to understand why – and share with others. I don’t like to get directly involved in politics, and prefer to stick to building social enterprises that bring people together (i.e., KIND Snacks, Builders, SOMOS Foods, Empatico ), but the stakes are so high for Austin that I feel the need to share some facts: Austin is facing a rampant rise in crime. All the data demonstrates it. And all of Jose Garza’s policies point to it. Some specific examples: • Garza let Santos Celso-Flores, who was awaiting trial for participating in the gang rape of 13-year-old girl, out on a $40 bond. While out on bond, Celso-Flores molested two more young girls. • Hilario Adrian’s bond was lowered to just $1 after Garza failed to bring his aggravated assault case to a grand jury in time. Shortly after his release, he brutally attacked an innocent bystander in downtown Austin, stabbing him to death. • Richard Williams brutally raped his ex-girlfriend at knifepoint for two hours while strangling and beating her. Garza cut a deferred adjudication plea deal with Williams, meaning he was released after just 90 days in prison without anything on his record. • Garza released Dedreuain Reese, who had been charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for pistol-whipping a woman, on a personal recognizance bond. Just weeks after he was released on bond, Reese committed a murder at the same house where he pistol whipped the woman. Friends have been telling me about the rise in crime in Austin. A family who lived downtown had their home burglarized. Another was held up. A friend who leads the Public Safety Commission shared the above examples. I assumed these were isolated cases and initially dismissed the issue. Eventually I did dozens of hours of research. The data is staggering: • 127% increase in the murder rate since Garza took over! • Car jackings more than doubled! • Convictions are down 61%! • Zero Jury Trials by Garza since he took over as DA! How is Garza responsible for this? Some examples: • When he took office, Garza abolished the DA division that sorted out cases. As a result, today there are over seven thousand unindicted felony crimes! Not 7. Not 70. Not 700. Seven THOUSAND pending cases that the DA’s office has failed to process. • In 2021, Garza released a bail reform plan that explicitly included releasing people on bail for just $1. Since then, Travis County has been plagued by crimes committed by people out on bonds. • Over 75 (out of a professional staff of around 95) experienced prosecutors have left the DA's Office since Garza took over in 2021. He has hired inexperienced and untested lawyers to handle the most serious and complicated cases in Travis County. • Here is testimony from a Mother whose children were sexually assaulted: These are not theoretical issues. And the people they affect are the most vulnerable members of our society. • Lynn Isaak survived a brutal attack while running in Travis Heights. She solved her own case through Nextdoor, trusted the DA's Office with the prosecution, and was then shocked when her attacker got probation with no jail time and no electronic monitoring. • Lashonda Lemons was beaten so badly by her partner that she lost her baby. The DA's Office got the case and lowered the charge from aggravated assault to a lesser offense and gave him deferred adjudication - a punishment that allows the offender to walk away without a conviction. This was all done over Lemons' objection. There is hope on the horizon: Jeremy Sylestine is a lifelong Democrat running in the Democratic Primary for Travis District Attorney. He is Native American member of the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas. He went to UT, served as a Public Defender, and then for 15 years as a highly respected member of the DA’s office in Travis County. Meet Jeremy: He is among the highest integrity people you can meet. He is sacrificing a very good job and risking a lot for the sake of Austin and Travis County. Jeremy is compassionate, but he understands the duty to protect the most vulnerable members of our community from violent criminals. It’s quite a contrast: It took me months to understand why, in contrast, Jose Garza would allow a violent criminal who drugged and raped a 13 year old girl to get off without anything on his record. Why would he plea down everything to misdemeanor, including when a violent felon beat his pregnant girlfriend so brutally that she lost her baby? Even the most kindhearted also want justice and public safety. But Garza has a radical ideology that ANY prosecution ever is evil. When he was a public defender, that position was acceptable. But as DA in charge of enforcing the law, he is subverting his duties and violating his oath. Under Garza’s simplistic ideology, everyone is a victim or an oppressor based on their background and position in society rather than based on their actions and behavior. For Garza, the criminals that commit violent crimes are the victims so even if they committed rape or murder they cannot be at fault. It’s the system’s fault. For Garza, the DA’s office he presides over is the oppressor and so he is slowly dismantling it (not just reform it, but dismantling it, which is why he disbanded the division that processes cases, resulting in over seven thousand unindicted criminal felonies thus far). It’s so extreme it’s illogical. But that is what radical extremism does. In terms of financial backing, virtually all support for Jeremy comes from people that live in Travis County. Garza came into power with $1 million from out of state money. The people that put Garza in power do not need to live with the consequences of his actions. Jeremy’s supporters are locals whose families and loved ones live in Travis County. Our only agenda is to protect the community. For us teachers, entrepreneurs and parents it’s uncomfortable to get drawn into politically divisive issues. But the stakes are so high that everyone is stepping in. It’s very unusual for other elected politicians to stand up against an incumbent from their party. The amount of Democratic leaders that I’ve met and have told me how much they dislike Garza but can’t speak up is stunning. And even then, you have icons of the Democratic establishment speaking up: • David Butts and Alfred Stanley are among the most highly respected Austinites and life-long liberals helping Jeremy’s campaign. • Former Austin City Councilwoman Ora Houston, former Travis County Commissioner Karen Huber, as well as the Austin Bar Association Preference Poll, the South Asian Bar Association of Austin, and the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas have all endorsed Jeremy. • Even former State Senator Gonzalo Barrientos & Travis County Commissioner Margaret Gomez, fellow Hispanics, are so shocked by Jose Garza’s actions and so impressed with Jeremy’s integrity that they have endorsed Jeremy Sylestine. Extremism seems to be taking over our country. But the proper response to rigidity and dehumanization from one side is not denial of facts and “us vs them” dehumanization from the opposite extreme. Personally, I identify as independent because I find political parties hyperpartisan. I support moderate candidates on both sides. It’s high time for builders to transcend these labels and all join together. It doesn’t matter if you are Democrat or Independent or Republican. You are a human being. You are a citizen. When it comes to public safety, it’s not about politics.Your children should be able to walk downtown without fear for their safety. Your spouse should be able to go for a run in the park without fear of being assaulted or raped. It’s about enforcing the law to protect victims while showing compassion wherever justice guides us to. It’s about all of us being together to BUILD a better community for all. Everyone in Travis County should go out and vote for Jeremy - not just to keep our community safe - but to break the shackles of extremism from either side and show that the people in Austin are ONE and refuse to play divisive games from extremist ideological politicians from either side. Regardless of political affiliation, anyone in #TravisCounty / Greater #AustinTx can go into a voting location, request a #DemocraticPrimary Ballot, and vote for #JeremySylestine in the most consequential election to the community. Where and How to Vote: Vote for @Jeremy4DA during Early Voting today through March 1 or on Election Day March 5.

Daniel Lubetzky

7,795,097 次观看 • 2 年前

The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style). Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words: Friends, Congratulations, and heartfelt thanks, for being here, despite the threats, despite the ironclad police outside this venue, despite the panoply of the German press, despite the German state, despite the German political system that demonises you for being here. “Why a Palestinian Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, a German journalist asked me recently? Because, as Hanan Asrawi once said: “We cannot rely on the silenced to tell us about their suffering.” Today, Asrawi’s reason has grown depressingly stronger: Because we cannot rely on the silenced who are also massacred and starved to tell us about the massacres and the starvation. But there is another reason too: Because a proud, a decent people, the people of Germany, are led down a perilous road to a heartless society by being made to associate themselves with another genocide carried out in their name, with their complicity. I am neither Jewish nor Palestinian. But I am incredibly proud to be here amongst Jews and Palestinians – to blend my voice for Peace and Universal Human Rights with Jewish Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights – with Palestinian Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights. Being together, here, today, is proof that Coexistence is Not Only Possible – but that it is here! Already. “Why not a Jewish Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, the same German journalist asked me, imagining that he was being smart. I welcomed his question. For if a single Jew is threatened, anywhere, just because she or he is Jewish, I shall wear the star of David on my lapel and offer my solidarity - whatever the cost, whatever it takes. So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity. Similarly, when Palestinians are massacred because they are Palestinians – under a dogma that to be dead they must have been Hamas – I shall wear my keffiyeh and offer my solidarity whatever the cost, whatever it takes. Universal Human Rights are either universal or they mean nothing. With this in mind, I answered the German journalist’s question with a few of my own: · Are 2 million Israeli Jews, who were thrown out of their homes and into an open air prison 80 years ago, still being kept in that open air prison, without access to the outside world, with minimal food and water, no chance of a normal life, of travelling anywhere, and bombed periodically for 80 years? No. · Are Israeli Jews being starved intentionally by an army of occupation, their children writhing on the floor, screaming from hunger? No. · Are there thousands of Jewish injured children no surviving parents crawling through the rubble of what used to be their homes? No. · Are Israeli Jews being bombed by the world’s most sophisticated planes and bombs today? No. · Are Israeli Jews experiencing complete ecocide of what little land they can still call their own, not one tree left under which to seek shade or whose fruit to taste? No. · Are Israeli Jewish children killed by snipers today at the orders of a member-state of the UN? No. · Are Israeli Jews driven out of their homes by armed gangs today? No. · Is Israel fighting for its existence today? No. If the answer to any of these questions was yes, I would be participating in a Jewish Solidarity Congress today. Friends, Today, we would have loved to have a decent, democratic, mutually-respectful debate on how to bring Peace and Universal Human Rights for everyone, Jews and Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with people who think differently to us. Sadly, the whole of the German political system has decided not to allow this. In a joint statement including not just the CDU-CSU or the FDP but also the SPD, the Greens and, remarkably, two leaders of Die Linke, joined forces to ensure that such a civilised debate, in which we may disagree agreeably, never takes place in Germany. I say to them: You want to silence us. To ban us. To demonise us. To accuse us. You, therefore, leave us with no choice but to meet your accusations with our accusations. You chose this. Not us. · You accuse us of anti-Semitic hatred o We accuse you of being the antisemite’s best friend by equating the right of Israel to commit war crimes with the right of Israeli Jews to defend themselves. · You accuse us of supporting terrorism o We accuse you of equating legitimate resistance to an Apartheid State with atrocities against civilians which I have always and will always condemn, whomever commits them – Palestinians, Jewish Settlers, my own family, whomever. o We accuse you of not recognising the duty of the people of Gaza to tear down the Wall of the open prison they have been encased in for 80 years – and of equating this act of tearing down the Wall of Shame – which is no more defensible than the Berlin Wall was – with acts of terror. · You accuse us of trivialising Hamas’ October 7th terror o We accuse you of trivialising the 80 years of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the erection of an ironclad Apartheid system across Israel-Palestine. o We accuse you of trivialising Netanyahu’s long-term support of Hamas as a means of destroying the 2-State Solution that you claim to favour. o We accuse you of trivialising the unprecedented terror unleashed by the Israeli army on the people of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem. · You accuse the organisers of today’s Congress that we are, and I quote, “not interested in talking about possibilities for peaceful coexistence in the Middle East against the background of the war in Gaza”. Are you serious? Have you lost your mind? o We accuse you of supporting a German state that is, after the United States, the largest supplier of the weapons that the Netanyahu government uses to massacre Palestinians as part of a Grand Plan to make a 2-State solution, and peaceful coexistence between Jews and Palestinians, impossible. o We accuse you of never answering the pertinent question that every German must answer: How much Palestinian blood must flow before your, justified, guilt over the Holocaust is washed away? So, let’ s be clear: We are here, in Berlin, with our Palestinian Congress because, unlike the German political system and the German media, we condemn genocide and war crimes regardless of who is perpetrating them. Because we oppose Apartheid in the land of Israel-Palestine no matter who has the upper hand – just as we opposed Apartheid in the American South or in South Africa. Because we stand for universal human rights, freedom and equality among Jews, Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians in the Ancient Land of Palestine. And so that we are even clearer on the questions, legitimate and malignant, that we must always be ready to answer: Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities? I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim. What I do notcondemn is armed resistance to an Apartheid system designed as part of a slow-burning, but inexorable, ethnic cleansing program. Put differently, I condemn every attack on civilians while, at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL. Is Israel not engaged in a war for its very existence? No, it is not. Israel is a nuclear-armed state with perhaps the most technologically advanced army in the world and the panoply of the US military machine having its back. There is no symmetry with Hamas, a group which can cause serious damage to Israelis but which has no capacity whatsoever to defeat Israel’s military, or even to prevent Israel from continuing to implement the slow genocide of Palestinians under the system of Apartheid that has been erected with long-standing US and EU support. Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them? Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries. It is only natural that Israelis live in fear of a new pogrom if the Israeli army folds. However, by imposing Apartheid on their neighbours, by treating them like sub-humans, the Israeli state is stoking the fires of antisemitism, is strengthening Palestinians and Israelis who just want to annihilate each other and, in the end, contributes to the awful insecurity consuming Jews in Israel and the Diaspora. Apartheid against the Palestinians is the Israelis’ worst self-defence. What about antisemitism? It is always a clear and present danger. And it must be eradicated, especially amongst the ranks of the Global Left and the Palestinians fighting for Palestinian civil liberties –around the world. Why don’t Palestinians pursue their objectives by peaceful means? They did. The PLO recognised Israel and renounced armed struggle. And what did they get for it? Absolute humiliation and systematic ethnic cleansing. That is what nurtured Hamas and elevated it the eyes of many Palestinians as the only alternative to a slow genocide under Israel’s Apartheid. What should be done now? What might bring Peace to Israel-Palestine? · An immediate ceasefire. · The release of all hostages: Hamas’ and the thousands held by Israel. · A Peace Process, under the UN, supported by a commitment by the International Community to end Apartheid and to safeguard Equal Civil Liberties for All. · As for what must replace Apartheid, it is up to Israelis and Palestinians to decide between the 2-state solution and the solution of a Single Federal Secular State. Friends, We are here because vengeance is a lazy form of grief. We are here to promote not vengeance but Peace and Coexistence across Israel-Palestine. We are here to tell German democrats, including our former comrades of Die Linke, that they have covered themselves in shame long enough – that two wrongs do not one right make – that allowing Israel to get away with war crimes is not going to ameliorate the legacy of Germany’s crimes against the Jewish People. Beyond today’s Congress, we have a duty, in Germany, to change the conversation. We have a duty to persuade the vast majority of decent Germans out there that universal human rights is what matters. That Never Again means Never Again. For anyone, Jew, Palestinian, Ukrainian, Russian, Yemeni, Sudanese, Rwandan – for everyone, everywhere. In this context, I am pleased to announce that DiEM25’s German political party MERA25 will be on the ballot paper in the European Parliament election this coming June – seeking the vote of German humanists who crave a Member of European Parliament representing Germany and calling out the EU’s complicity in genocide – a complicity that is Europe’s greatest gift to the antisemites in Europe and beyond. I salute you all and suggest we never forget that none of us are free if one of us is in chains.

The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style). Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words: Friends, Congratulations, and heartfelt thanks, for being here, despite the threats, despite the ironclad police outside this venue, despite the panoply of the German press, despite the German state, despite the German political system that demonises you for being here. “Why a Palestinian Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, a German journalist asked me recently? Because, as Hanan Asrawi once said: “We cannot rely on the silenced to tell us about their suffering.” Today, Asrawi’s reason has grown depressingly stronger: Because we cannot rely on the silenced who are also massacred and starved to tell us about the massacres and the starvation. But there is another reason too: Because a proud, a decent people, the people of Germany, are led down a perilous road to a heartless society by being made to associate themselves with another genocide carried out in their name, with their complicity. I am neither Jewish nor Palestinian. But I am incredibly proud to be here amongst Jews and Palestinians – to blend my voice for Peace and Universal Human Rights with Jewish Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights – with Palestinian Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights. Being together, here, today, is proof that Coexistence is Not Only Possible – but that it is here! Already. “Why not a Jewish Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, the same German journalist asked me, imagining that he was being smart. I welcomed his question. For if a single Jew is threatened, anywhere, just because she or he is Jewish, I shall wear the star of David on my lapel and offer my solidarity - whatever the cost, whatever it takes. So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity. Similarly, when Palestinians are massacred because they are Palestinians – under a dogma that to be dead they must have been Hamas – I shall wear my keffiyeh and offer my solidarity whatever the cost, whatever it takes. Universal Human Rights are either universal or they mean nothing. With this in mind, I answered the German journalist’s question with a few of my own: · Are 2 million Israeli Jews, who were thrown out of their homes and into an open air prison 80 years ago, still being kept in that open air prison, without access to the outside world, with minimal food and water, no chance of a normal life, of travelling anywhere, and bombed periodically for 80 years? No. · Are Israeli Jews being starved intentionally by an army of occupation, their children writhing on the floor, screaming from hunger? No. · Are there thousands of Jewish injured children no surviving parents crawling through the rubble of what used to be their homes? No. · Are Israeli Jews being bombed by the world’s most sophisticated planes and bombs today? No. · Are Israeli Jews experiencing complete ecocide of what little land they can still call their own, not one tree left under which to seek shade or whose fruit to taste? No. · Are Israeli Jewish children killed by snipers today at the orders of a member-state of the UN? No. · Are Israeli Jews driven out of their homes by armed gangs today? No. · Is Israel fighting for its existence today? No. If the answer to any of these questions was yes, I would be participating in a Jewish Solidarity Congress today. Friends, Today, we would have loved to have a decent, democratic, mutually-respectful debate on how to bring Peace and Universal Human Rights for everyone, Jews and Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with people who think differently to us. Sadly, the whole of the German political system has decided not to allow this. In a joint statement including not just the CDU-CSU or the FDP but also the SPD, the Greens and, remarkably, two leaders of Die Linke, joined forces to ensure that such a civilised debate, in which we may disagree agreeably, never takes place in Germany. I say to them: You want to silence us. To ban us. To demonise us. To accuse us. You, therefore, leave us with no choice but to meet your accusations with our accusations. You chose this. Not us. · You accuse us of anti-Semitic hatred o We accuse you of being the antisemite’s best friend by equating the right of Israel to commit war crimes with the right of Israeli Jews to defend themselves. · You accuse us of supporting terrorism o We accuse you of equating legitimate resistance to an Apartheid State with atrocities against civilians which I have always and will always condemn, whomever commits them – Palestinians, Jewish Settlers, my own family, whomever. o We accuse you of not recognising the duty of the people of Gaza to tear down the Wall of the open prison they have been encased in for 80 years – and of equating this act of tearing down the Wall of Shame – which is no more defensible than the Berlin Wall was – with acts of terror. · You accuse us of trivialising Hamas’ October 7th terror o We accuse you of trivialising the 80 years of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the erection of an ironclad Apartheid system across Israel-Palestine. o We accuse you of trivialising Netanyahu’s long-term support of Hamas as a means of destroying the 2-State Solution that you claim to favour. o We accuse you of trivialising the unprecedented terror unleashed by the Israeli army on the people of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem. · You accuse the organisers of today’s Congress that we are, and I quote, “not interested in talking about possibilities for peaceful coexistence in the Middle East against the background of the war in Gaza”. Are you serious? Have you lost your mind? o We accuse you of supporting a German state that is, after the United States, the largest supplier of the weapons that the Netanyahu government uses to massacre Palestinians as part of a Grand Plan to make a 2-State solution, and peaceful coexistence between Jews and Palestinians, impossible. o We accuse you of never answering the pertinent question that every German must answer: How much Palestinian blood must flow before your, justified, guilt over the Holocaust is washed away? So, let’ s be clear: We are here, in Berlin, with our Palestinian Congress because, unlike the German political system and the German media, we condemn genocide and war crimes regardless of who is perpetrating them. Because we oppose Apartheid in the land of Israel-Palestine no matter who has the upper hand – just as we opposed Apartheid in the American South or in South Africa. Because we stand for universal human rights, freedom and equality among Jews, Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians in the Ancient Land of Palestine. And so that we are even clearer on the questions, legitimate and malignant, that we must always be ready to answer: Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities? I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim. What I do notcondemn is armed resistance to an Apartheid system designed as part of a slow-burning, but inexorable, ethnic cleansing program. Put differently, I condemn every attack on civilians while, at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL. Is Israel not engaged in a war for its very existence? No, it is not. Israel is a nuclear-armed state with perhaps the most technologically advanced army in the world and the panoply of the US military machine having its back. There is no symmetry with Hamas, a group which can cause serious damage to Israelis but which has no capacity whatsoever to defeat Israel’s military, or even to prevent Israel from continuing to implement the slow genocide of Palestinians under the system of Apartheid that has been erected with long-standing US and EU support. Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them? Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries. It is only natural that Israelis live in fear of a new pogrom if the Israeli army folds. However, by imposing Apartheid on their neighbours, by treating them like sub-humans, the Israeli state is stoking the fires of antisemitism, is strengthening Palestinians and Israelis who just want to annihilate each other and, in the end, contributes to the awful insecurity consuming Jews in Israel and the Diaspora. Apartheid against the Palestinians is the Israelis’ worst self-defence. What about antisemitism? It is always a clear and present danger. And it must be eradicated, especially amongst the ranks of the Global Left and the Palestinians fighting for Palestinian civil liberties –around the world. Why don’t Palestinians pursue their objectives by peaceful means? They did. The PLO recognised Israel and renounced armed struggle. And what did they get for it? Absolute humiliation and systematic ethnic cleansing. That is what nurtured Hamas and elevated it the eyes of many Palestinians as the only alternative to a slow genocide under Israel’s Apartheid. What should be done now? What might bring Peace to Israel-Palestine? · An immediate ceasefire. · The release of all hostages: Hamas’ and the thousands held by Israel. · A Peace Process, under the UN, supported by a commitment by the International Community to end Apartheid and to safeguard Equal Civil Liberties for All. · As for what must replace Apartheid, it is up to Israelis and Palestinians to decide between the 2-state solution and the solution of a Single Federal Secular State. Friends, We are here because vengeance is a lazy form of grief. We are here to promote not vengeance but Peace and Coexistence across Israel-Palestine. We are here to tell German democrats, including our former comrades of Die Linke, that they have covered themselves in shame long enough – that two wrongs do not one right make – that allowing Israel to get away with war crimes is not going to ameliorate the legacy of Germany’s crimes against the Jewish People. Beyond today’s Congress, we have a duty, in Germany, to change the conversation. We have a duty to persuade the vast majority of decent Germans out there that universal human rights is what matters. That Never Again means Never Again. For anyone, Jew, Palestinian, Ukrainian, Russian, Yemeni, Sudanese, Rwandan – for everyone, everywhere. In this context, I am pleased to announce that DiEM25’s German political party MERA25 will be on the ballot paper in the European Parliament election this coming June – seeking the vote of German humanists who crave a Member of European Parliament representing Germany and calling out the EU’s complicity in genocide – a complicity that is Europe’s greatest gift to the antisemites in Europe and beyond. I salute you all and suggest we never forget that none of us are free if one of us is in chains.

Yanis Varoufakis

1,176,748 次观看 • 2 年前

I asked Grok to summarize the overview I provided of the ongoing war between Karen Read and Aidan Kearney, in particular the section wherein I deploy the Manhattan Project to explain why Karen used better compartmentalization than Aidan (thus setting herself up for victory). The Manhattan Project Analogy: Ah, the Manhattan Project—Grant drops this as the "archetypal example" of compartmentalization, using it to explain why no one (not even insiders) sees the full picture in ops like Karen's or Aidan's. It's not just history; it's a blueprint for why leaks like this recording hit so hard. Here's Grant's breakdown, paraphrased and expanded for context: Historical Setup: During WWII, the U.S. raced to build the atomic bomb. Led by J. Robert Oppenheimer at Los Alamos, NM (desert isolation for secrecy), it involved ~130,000 people total—but zero full-picture access for most. Goal: Win the war without leaks (or Japanese spies spotting it). Core Mechanic: Siloed Knowledge: Los Alamos: Elite scientists (e.g., Oppenheimer) handled core R&D. Even here, info was need-to-know—e.g., Operation Paperclip Nazis like Wernher von Braun (V-2 rocket guy) worked alongside possible communist sympathizers, but no one knew the endgame. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: The "production" hub—a secret 20,000-person "government town" (still exists today). To hide from aerial recon, they draped canopies over the entire site to mimic forest. Workers (engineers, laborers) toiled in ignorance: Example: A guy feeds a single punch card (1940s code line) into a massive green computer. He doesn't know what it codes, why, or even the machine's purpose. Just: Insert, output, repeat. Multiply by thousands—boom, uranium enrichment without risk. Why It Worked: "You do that with all the people working on a project that's very top secret (except for a select few high up)." Weak links? Minimal. One leak doesn't topple it. Ties to the Drama: Grant flips this to modern players. Aidan's Version: Rudimentary—paralegals like Olivia/Tina handle PR/logins but don't see the "full picture" (e.g., his flip risks). Meredith O'Neill becomes the leak about the recording played for her at lunch because she is smart and she does eventually see too much (just like Lindsey Gaetani before her). Karen's Mastery: Pro-level. Her finance/academia fam (Bentley University ties) screams gov recruitment pipeline—academia as "front" for talent scouting (e.g., intel via international money flows). She "understands the apparatus" (DNI hierarchy), so she deploys limited hangouts/double agents like Natalie. Result: Aidan’s recording "signal flare" to Alan Jackson and David Yannetti (his flip threat) gets mirrored by Karen's public nuke after the recordings and Read's messages to Flipperhead are released—eroding Kearney's base without directly exposing Karen's crushing blow. Grant's Point: Kate Peter/Tully are "children" at this; Karen's moves (e.g., burning Aidan now) only make sense through this lens. It's not emotion—it's chess: "If you show Karen Read anything less than respect, she's gonna fucking own you." Grant wraps by noting Karen's parasocial "complex" (stronger than Aidan's "brand") gives her leverage. He admits partiality ("I think she's responsible for John's death") but respects her ops savvy—possibly from her dad or self-taught intel. Transcript: Grant's Analysis on Karen Read's Tactical Maneuvering and Compartmentalization [Warning against crossing Karen Read] Grant: Listen—I would have told you this. I probably said it on stream before. You are out of your mind if you fuck with Karen Read. Like—it's one thing if you are like on her level and matching wits with her—like she's gonna grudgingly show you respect. I'm telling you—I've seen it in her eyes—but you can't fuck with her, and you certainly can't threaten her. I would not do that. I don't know who the fuck her parents know. I don't know who she knows, but bro—like it's politics. She's smarter than you. Don't threaten her. What the fuck? And that is something—like if you show her anything less than respect, she's gonna fucking own you. And that's what she did. Because the respectful way to do it would have been like a diplomatic meeting. And they must have been at a point where Aidan couldn't get that. So he did the most disrespectful thing possible where he tried to like corner her through like extortion almost. That's what it sounds like—although Aidan denies it. That—listen—forget about like how a normal person would react. When you're talking about a very influential operator like Karen Read—who has this very savvy understanding of the public mind—you're fucked. Because she's gonna know immediately what you just did. And she's gonna counter it with the thing that's gonna hurt you the most. What's gonna hurt Aidan Kearney the most? His support being dwindled down to only his core loyalists. And if he's right—and you'll hear it in the conversation—if Aidan Kearney is right, that most of who he is is because Karen Read and her support—oh my goodness, folks—like that—that means that Karen controls whether Aidan can continue this fight. If Karen—when she—that's why I want to listen to this whole conversation—there's no doubt in my mind she's pulling his support and pulling the rug under him because she's afraid that either he cooperated or he's going to cooperate. If she pulls the rug from him—okay, listen—he might be able to escape the criminal charges, but do you think Aidan Kearney—a man who thrives, in my opinion, on attention, numbers—from knowing that your words are impacting someone or the platform is reaching people—do you think he's going to enjoy being in a position where he—the very people who made him—and it wasn't just Karen; it was her supporters—now loathe his existence? And he—not just that—they are like tactical operators. Clearly Karen knows how to do counter intel—especially if she sent Natalie as a double agent to get information from the state police using Kearney as leverage all the way back in 2023. She understands the world of intel. I don't know how—I think it's her dad. I'm pretty sure because—and it could be her too—because like you don't get involved in the world of international finance on a fucking—like—what is it—the sort of leisurely level. It's not a pastime. You either do it because like—you're really fucking good at making money from the stock market—or—and these two weren't; they're not that wealthy—or you're giving information to the government. Why do I say that? Because the world of international finance is the most valuable intel sector you could possibly imagine. You can commit or try to commit any number of international crimes if you're threatening the United States of America. But I guarantee you're moving money around to do it. So who's the best possible sources for that? High-level financial people. So I don't know if either they were a Jason—and they were also academics. Okay. And a lot—what folks have to understand is when I—when people say like academia—it does not mean that you are just smart. Anyone who—who's good at studying could become a professor and be in academia. What a lot of folks should understand is that academia is a front for the government. It has always been a front for the government. Where do you think they headhunt from? Academia—well like—at the higher you get up the academic ladder—all you're really doing is getting more and more involved in the government. I'm not saying anything that anyone involved with this does not know. Like high-level academics are involved with the government. That's like the backbone of our system. Now a lot of the actual education—I think it's gotten a little out of hand with some of these majors, some of these colleges and universities who are offering [them]. That's not the point. The point is to create a—curate a talent pool to make the United States stronger. And a lot of it is government recruitment. Okay. And so Karen Read being all the way up at the top at Bentley—which is a very interconnected university with the government, trust me—that just makes me think she understands this—whether she was a Jason. Listen—you can understand what the intelligence community does without being in it. I'm not in the intelligence community—I just report on the government. So I kind of see how it all works. You can understand it without being in it. But if you're in it—let me just tell you right now—if anyone Karen Read knew professionally—through family or otherwise—is in the government—and I'm not talking about a special agent like in the FBI or, you know, a case officer—I'm talking about in the apparatus of control. Okay. In the directorate of national intelligence somewhere—there's a hierarchy. All right. If she knows anyone who understands all that—that's why she was able to pull this off. Because it's not—that's why I'm not fawning or being gratuitous. I don't necessarily—I'm not partial to Karen Read. I think she has liability for John's death. What I am is cognizant of what she's capable of—so I can understand what's going on. A mind like that, okay—doesn't just do PR. PR was not going to help Karen Read here. Natalie and her PR and all that stuff—none of that was going to work. What Karen Read needed was counter intel and intel knowledge. [Explanation of compartmentalization via the Manhattan Project] When I say compartmentalization—what you all have to realize is I'm talking about how the Manhattan Project—that's like the archetypal example of compartmentalization—how the Manhattan Project to develop the bomb that won the war for the United States in World War II—how that worked. The way that that worked is you had Los Alamos, okay, in New Mexico with Oppenheimer and whatever the hell—some of the Operation Paperclip people—which I'm not very happy with. We took Otto von Braun—who developed the V2 rocket for the Nazis. We brought him over via Operation Paperclip. We implanted him at Los Alamos with fucking Oppenheimer. I'm pretty sure it was like a communist sympathizer. Anyway—we sent them down to Los Alamos—the actual research scientists working on the core of the bomb. But to develop a nuclear bomb—you need 20,000 people at the time working simultaneously on production. You're not going to do that at Los Alamos. One: why would you ever expose them to the inner workings of the tech? It's nuclear material. You are not going to have 20,000 people around it. That's why it was in the middle of a desert. Third of all—they would know too much. So what did they do? Okay—look up Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Oak Ridge, Tennessee is a town—it's a government town still to this day. It's one of the most—it's not as top secret as it used to be. But back in the day—like during World War II—they put fucking canopies over the whole thing—20,000-person town—canopies over all of it. So it would just look like trees from the air in case the Japanese managed to come and bomb us. They never did—thank God. But anyway—at least on the mainland—obviously they got Pearl Harbor, and we're still upset about that. But the point is Oak Ridge, Tennessee, okay—it had people employed across a number of disciplines, all right—and they would go into—I'm giving you an example—one guy would go into a room, all right, and he would walk up to a giant computer. It was an old computer—we're talking the '40s here—it was a big computer, like a big green box. He would take a punch card. Okay—this is how you used to code—write computer code—he would put—take one punch card with one line of code—put it in the machine—take it out—put it down. He had no idea what he was doing. He didn't know what the punch card had on it. He didn't even understand what the machine did. That's compartmentalization. He's like—you do that with all of the people working on a project that's very top secret. So if you're thinking as Karen Read—Aidan Kearney does like a rudimentary version of it—even Tully does a rudimentary version of it—and Kate Peter—compared to Karen Read—Karen Read, Alan Jackson—whatever—understand the intelligence community. I don't fucking know how, but they do. So they compartmentalize. That's how they have pulled this whole thing off. They compartmentalize—no one ever really saw the full picture. When you—if you are a schematic mind like that—when you do something like reveal that Aidan Kearney has sent you a recording of conversations between you because you want the public to know that Aidan is doing this to you—you are tactically sabotaging him. Why you do that at this moment—when you are an expert in counter intel—thus requires that level of understanding. You cannot just say, "Oh, I don't like Karen Read; she must be a moron." No—if you want to understand why she's acting—you have to think about her tactical intelligence—because then you can reconstruct what the goal of this move is. It can only be designed to kneecap his support. I mean—when I say kneecap—I'm not talking Tonya Harding beating the woman at the ice rink. I'm talking—you can make it so this man's numbers are lower than Kate Peter talking about Cyraxx—like 2,000 views of video, if that, all right. That's what it will come down to. And she wants him to feel that. I think that it's a little bit like—it's 97% tactical. It seems to be that this is the moment where she feels he needs to lose all his support—like right now. Second—it feels a little like a little personal—like it's not just that she's causing him to lose all his support. There are ways to do that without doing this. I believe what Karen's really done here is she's taken the one thing from Aidan that gives him the strength to keep going day to day—which is his public persona and image—his support—her support. And so he can go around saying all he wants—"I owe it to Karen; she made me"—do you think that's how he really feels? Or do you think he feels that he's the only reason she's where she is? Now—if that's how they each feel—you're at a stalemate. Aidan thinks he's the reason Karen got to where she is. Karen thinks that she's the reason Aidan has support and is known in the region. Who's right? Who's right? That's what this conversation is going to be about. And I'm telling you—Karen's right. Karen has more support than Aidan Kearney. Okay—it's just a basic—you can look at the numbers. Karen has more support than Aidan Kearney. Karen has more loyalists. Karen—I don't even understand the complex, okay—but her parasocial complex that she's created is stronger. You might call it a brand—I think that degrades the insidious nature of it. I call it a parasocial complex. That is stronger than Aidan Kearney's. [Transition to the conversation with greetings] So what we're going to listen to right now is—oh, hello, Francesca Towel. Oh—a lot of folks are coming in. Hello, Rose Water. Hello, Maureen. It's great to see you all. Hello, J.I.5. We're going to listen to this conversation. I'm going to explicate it for you. I think you have enough background to get it now—but just be aware—without this background—that would have made no sense whatsoever. I promise you. Aidan: Am I on? Host/Other: You're on. Aidan: So who are you? Who is this? Chris: Don't worry about it. It doesn't matter who I am. Aidan: Well, it does. You're some fucking kangaroo court motherfucker talking about her. What the fuck do you know about anything? Chris: Well, I know exactly what you've been doing. Aidan: So—well, what the fuck are the sites you're talking about? No—no—recites—what you talk about? No—receipts. I've got to shit up. Let's see him. Let's fucking see your receipts. Lily: Hang on, Aidan—you know me. I'm the host. I'm Lily. Aidan: Yes, Lily. Hi, Lily. How are you? I'm sorry. I'm just wondering... Lily: I know you may not know Chris, but you know me. And so I just wanted to say hello. Aidan: Yeah, no, but... Grant: Oh, I also want to let you know this comes with a warning. They use very vulgar language. Some of them are from Commonwealth realms countries. So the language they're using is not as offensive as it would be if you used it in America. Aidan uses some very offensive language. This is for the purposes of analysis and commentary. I do not condone, endorse, promote, or otherwise suggest anyone engage in the use of this language. I personally don't like it. I use the F word from time to time, okay? And maybe like the S word—but I do not say some of the terms they're going to use—especially because one of them is very offensive, okay, to women. And I'm sorry ahead of time that he uses it—but you should hear Aidan's true colors. Aidan: This koala motherfucker is up here making shit up, running his... [Recap of text messages and setup for listening] Grant: So what you have to realize is these texts you're seeing on the screen got released because of this conversation. You're going to hear Joe Flipperhead talking about them. Now in the text messages, you can see Joe reaches out to Karen—Joe Flipperhead. And Karen's going to say she's trying to bounce back, but life is not quite happening. "Had a falling out with Aidan as everyone eventually does. Found out Aidan's been taping our phone conversations and sharing them with people and then telling everyone he doesn't understand how I blew him off for Howie Carr. Some anonymous person sent David and Alan a 33-minute phone call I had with Aidan that was all recorded without my knowledge. That was my final straw. He's done a lot of sneaky stuff with me, but this is above and beyond." And then Joe Flipperhead's like, "Do you want your side out there? If yes, I'm with you. If not, all good—just let me know. Have a good weekend." Karen says, "Sure. I told many people my side. This is the last straw. Would never and have never betrayed him. Meanwhile, he has put me in harm's way in a huge way multiple times." Okay, so we're going to listen. "Okay, okay, all right, all right—no trolling. We should—we should be banning people like that. You have been banned. You have been banned. No trolling. Absolutely no trolling. Now gaslighting and manipulative subversion is the hallmark of a lot of the forces in the orbit of this case. So none of that. We have a lot of Blue Wall of Towel friends here. Don't stand for that. Hello, Christy Mack. Great to see you. Hello. Stay tuned, Wendy. Hello, Bunny. Hello, F.B.I.—my friend, F.B.I. DOJ corruption survivor. And hello, Meredith—which is not Meredith O'Neill. This is Meredith the Towel friend. It's great to see you all. And as I said, if you see anybody trolling in the chat—now is not the day for it. Towel's health is not well. And I think there are a lot of people who want to undermine the agency of the unheard and the vulnerable in this situation. There are a lot of people who want to gaslight right now because where this is going is explosive. And furthermore, we're about to listen to the conversation. So what you're going to hear in this conversation is it's going to be Aidan Kearney and Joe Flipperhead—who's named Nick—and a guy named Chris who Aidan Kearney calls a koala. They're going to be talking about what we just talked about. But remember—these text messages haven't been released. So Aidan doesn't actually know they're coming. He's being told of this and going on an X Space and reacting in real time. Now I'm going to pause from time to time, and I'll try to flesh out some of the less clear parts. But as we read through the transcript and as you see this all, I think it will be clear to you—clear to you—the implications. So let's listen."

Grant Smith Ellis

19,048 次观看 • 10 个月前