Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Imagine you have a point dancing in space, following three simple rules. You’d think it would eventually settle down or repeat itself, right? Nature isn't always that predictable. This is the Rössler Attractor. It’s a beautiful piece of "organized chaos." By just tweaking a few non-linear equations, we get...

PhilosophyOfPhy's profile picture

Philosophy Of Physics

122,346 subscribers

40,168 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

A simple MPC controller for path tracking implemented in python. Few resources actually teach it without assuming a PhD first. This open-source project does exactly that: An iterative MPC tracking controller (built with CVXPY and MuJoCo) that shows how to make a robot (or autonomous vehicle) follow a path and avoid obstacles in real time. → Autonomous logistics, robot navigation, vehicle control; there's a path-following algorithm behind all of it. → Most implementations are black boxes. This one shows you what's actually happening. → It uses convex optimization (no non-linear solver), and still handles real vehicle physics through iterative linearization. What makes it practical is that you can run it with the mushr car model in MuJoCo, or headless without any physics simulation if you just want to understand the logic. If you're making the jump from classical control to real-time optimisation, this is a very good starting point. 📌 Repository: ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:
0:14

A simple MPC controller for path tracking implemented in python. Few resources actually teach it without assuming a PhD first. This open-source project does exactly that: An iterative MPC tracking controller (built with CVXPY and MuJoCo) that shows how to make a robot (or autonomous vehicle) follow a path and avoid obstacles in real time. → Autonomous logistics, robot navigation, vehicle control; there's a path-following algorithm behind all of it. → Most implementations are black boxes. This one shows you what's actually happening. → It uses convex optimization (no non-linear solver), and still handles real vehicle physics through iterative linearization. What makes it practical is that you can run it with the mushr car model in MuJoCo, or headless without any physics simulation if you just want to understand the logic. If you're making the jump from classical control to real-time optimisation, this is a very good starting point. 📌 Repository: ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

16,064 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

my two favorite people saying the same thing “just give it a try” 🥹 🦌: the most important thing is to just give it a try. i think the idea of taking that first step is one of the most important things in life 🦮: moments when we have to make big decisions can be scary, and i think that's completely normal. but the fact that something feels scary also means it’s a very important opportunity. that’s why i think it’s important to really think about what you want and then just give it a try. because if you don’t try, you’ll definitely regret it later on
0:11

my two favorite people saying the same thing “just give it a try” 🥹 🦌: the most important thing is to just give it a try. i think the idea of taking that first step is one of the most important things in life 🦮: moments when we have to make big decisions can be scary, and i think that's completely normal. but the fact that something feels scary also means it’s a very important opportunity. that’s why i think it’s important to really think about what you want and then just give it a try. because if you don’t try, you’ll definitely regret it later on

ev.

35,194 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

even so, I trust that any new watcher will be able to pick up what's going on. The people who made the OVAs shown from time and time again that they have faith in their viewers that they'll be able to understand the world building that culminated to this point. You can start the other shows prior to this, either before or after this OVA and it will still feel like a proper climax leading up to this. The story beats in this show are pretty good in the sense that anyone can understand it, it's not universally profound but it does a good job in highlighting perspectives of every side and have a glimpse at what happened that lead up to it.
0:19

even so, I trust that any new watcher will be able to pick up what's going on. The people who made the OVAs shown from time and time again that they have faith in their viewers that they'll be able to understand the world building that culminated to this point. You can start the other shows prior to this, either before or after this OVA and it will still feel like a proper climax leading up to this. The story beats in this show are pretty good in the sense that anyone can understand it, it's not universally profound but it does a good job in highlighting perspectives of every side and have a glimpse at what happened that lead up to it.

delty

41,473 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Her brother has small eyes and just bought a new car with the driver alert system. Even when he’s driving just normally with his small eyes, the systems warns him to pay attention. What’s funny is that it’s made by a manufacturer that should understand a certain demographic has smaller eyes. I’ve yet to duplicate this but I think I need to try Lexus next because I’ve seen it happen in a few of them. Mine seems to work just fine, when I look away at the light and it turns green, it does notify and warn me as it should . So why do certain Asian car brands have driver alert systems that don’t understand that some people naturally have smaller eyes and that they aren’t just not paying attention? I did try this in a new Subaru and it did go off too. So it’s not limited to all brands it’s only certain ones. Some people go as far as to say this was intentional but I think the software might be being too sensitive to be honest. At least it’s working in a sense of creating an environment of caution. Does this happen to you too? Let me know what brand and mod car you have I will test it out. I want to see if I can get it to warn me all the time, I think it’s funny. As a person who always makes fun of the size of my eyes I think it’s funny it’s doing this primarily to Asian people. It’s like it’s making fun of a stereotype.
0:19

Her brother has small eyes and just bought a new car with the driver alert system. Even when he’s driving just normally with his small eyes, the systems warns him to pay attention. What’s funny is that it’s made by a manufacturer that should understand a certain demographic has smaller eyes. I’ve yet to duplicate this but I think I need to try Lexus next because I’ve seen it happen in a few of them. Mine seems to work just fine, when I look away at the light and it turns green, it does notify and warn me as it should . So why do certain Asian car brands have driver alert systems that don’t understand that some people naturally have smaller eyes and that they aren’t just not paying attention? I did try this in a new Subaru and it did go off too. So it’s not limited to all brands it’s only certain ones. Some people go as far as to say this was intentional but I think the software might be being too sensitive to be honest. At least it’s working in a sense of creating an environment of caution. Does this happen to you too? Let me know what brand and mod car you have I will test it out. I want to see if I can get it to warn me all the time, I think it’s funny. As a person who always makes fun of the size of my eyes I think it’s funny it’s doing this primarily to Asian people. It’s like it’s making fun of a stereotype.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

17,531 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis
0:11

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

Erika 

235,124 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A friend of mine just recently got his first gun, a striker fired Glock 19. He is terrified to leave a round chambered. To anyone reading this who has this same fear, I want to alleviate your concerns. I'm going to explain why there is nothing to be afraid of. First and foremost, I fully understand your concern. It's not irrational. And you're not stupid for being nervous about a bullet being aimed at your leg with the striker cocked back under spring tension about an 1/8 of an inch from the primer. I get it. I shared this concern when I was new to carrying. But your fear is due to a lack of understanding of the internal safety features of a modern striker fired handgun. On a properly maintained modern striker fired pistol the striker CANNOT hit the primer on the chambered round without the trigger being pulled. Can't. Not shouldn't. Can't. (If you have any good Sig P320 jokes, this is the proper place to share them) There is a block that the striker will hit and stop if it is released without the trigger being depressed. It works just like a lock and key. There is a channel in the blocker that the striker can pass through if it is in the fire position. It only goes into the fire position if the trigger is pulled which pushes the blocker into the fire position. A spring keeps the blocker firmly in the block position until then. The blocker is a solid piece of steel that won't break. And if your gun is securely in a hard sided Kydex holster nothing can move the trigger unless it is unholstered. Many guns like Glocks have a trigger safety that prevents the trigger from moving due to force of dropping. Your finger has to be on the trigger safety to move it. So the gun cannot fire unless you pull the trigger. And it's easy for you to test this safety feature to see how it works! See the video below. You can try to push the striker forward by moving that piece at the back of the slide forward. That piece is the back of the striker. Push it forward and it will stop. The tip won't come out through the breach. You see it trying to come through but it gets stuck. Now push that little button in. That is the actual blocker. When you push it in you will now be able to move the striker forward through the breach and see how it will strike the primer. You can test this easily every time you disassemble your pistol to verify it is still working. You can break this safety feature by removing the blocker or losing the spring. But if it's there it will work. (You would be the first person in firearms history who has ever lost a spring. Literally the first one. It has never happened before. 😐) But it doesn't come out as part of regular maintenance. You have to disassemble the firing assembly to get it out. That won't happen by accident. And if you do that on purpose you should do this blocker test when you reassemble it to make sure the safety feature is working. My video shows a Glock slide. All Glocks will look like this. Other brands may put the blocker in a different spot or it may be a slightly different shape. But they all (mostly) have the same design. If you test yours as demonstrated and it works like mine does, your gun WILL NOT fire without pulling the trigger. (If you just thought of another P320 joke, this is another good place to toss that out there)
0:15

A friend of mine just recently got his first gun, a striker fired Glock 19. He is terrified to leave a round chambered. To anyone reading this who has this same fear, I want to alleviate your concerns. I'm going to explain why there is nothing to be afraid of. First and foremost, I fully understand your concern. It's not irrational. And you're not stupid for being nervous about a bullet being aimed at your leg with the striker cocked back under spring tension about an 1/8 of an inch from the primer. I get it. I shared this concern when I was new to carrying. But your fear is due to a lack of understanding of the internal safety features of a modern striker fired handgun. On a properly maintained modern striker fired pistol the striker CANNOT hit the primer on the chambered round without the trigger being pulled. Can't. Not shouldn't. Can't. (If you have any good Sig P320 jokes, this is the proper place to share them) There is a block that the striker will hit and stop if it is released without the trigger being depressed. It works just like a lock and key. There is a channel in the blocker that the striker can pass through if it is in the fire position. It only goes into the fire position if the trigger is pulled which pushes the blocker into the fire position. A spring keeps the blocker firmly in the block position until then. The blocker is a solid piece of steel that won't break. And if your gun is securely in a hard sided Kydex holster nothing can move the trigger unless it is unholstered. Many guns like Glocks have a trigger safety that prevents the trigger from moving due to force of dropping. Your finger has to be on the trigger safety to move it. So the gun cannot fire unless you pull the trigger. And it's easy for you to test this safety feature to see how it works! See the video below. You can try to push the striker forward by moving that piece at the back of the slide forward. That piece is the back of the striker. Push it forward and it will stop. The tip won't come out through the breach. You see it trying to come through but it gets stuck. Now push that little button in. That is the actual blocker. When you push it in you will now be able to move the striker forward through the breach and see how it will strike the primer. You can test this easily every time you disassemble your pistol to verify it is still working. You can break this safety feature by removing the blocker or losing the spring. But if it's there it will work. (You would be the first person in firearms history who has ever lost a spring. Literally the first one. It has never happened before. 😐) But it doesn't come out as part of regular maintenance. You have to disassemble the firing assembly to get it out. That won't happen by accident. And if you do that on purpose you should do this blocker test when you reassemble it to make sure the safety feature is working. My video shows a Glock slide. All Glocks will look like this. Other brands may put the blocker in a different spot or it may be a slightly different shape. But they all (mostly) have the same design. If you test yours as demonstrated and it works like mine does, your gun WILL NOT fire without pulling the trigger. (If you just thought of another P320 joke, this is another good place to toss that out there)

Spaceballs The X Account

197,088 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This is Russiagate summed up in 17 seconds. It’s a complex story with 1000s of moving parts, but at its core it’s very simple. It’s not just that it was all fabricated out of thin air, it’s that the people doing the investigating, charging, and imprisoning knew it was fabricated.
0:17

This is Russiagate summed up in 17 seconds. It’s a complex story with 1000s of moving parts, but at its core it’s very simple. It’s not just that it was all fabricated out of thin air, it’s that the people doing the investigating, charging, and imprisoning knew it was fabricated.

Hans Mahncke

24,001 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

For a Western observer, it is extremely difficult to understand what is happening in Iran. How is it possible that just a few weeks after the massacre of tens of thousands, young people risk their lives and begin a new wave of protests? The answer to this question is simple: These people do not want to live under the rule of a theocratic dictatorship because they have learned that they have no future. They can never find a job, have a family, or live a normal life. It is difficult to understand, but being alive or dead is not much different for them. Thousands commit suicide every year. After realizing that they share the same goal, they have now gathered together to bring about change. They will either change their future or embrace death. It is sad but true.
0:16

For a Western observer, it is extremely difficult to understand what is happening in Iran. How is it possible that just a few weeks after the massacre of tens of thousands, young people risk their lives and begin a new wave of protests? The answer to this question is simple: These people do not want to live under the rule of a theocratic dictatorship because they have learned that they have no future. They can never find a job, have a family, or live a normal life. It is difficult to understand, but being alive or dead is not much different for them. Thousands commit suicide every year. After realizing that they share the same goal, they have now gathered together to bring about change. They will either change their future or embrace death. It is sad but true.

Cina Foroutan-Nejad 🇮🇷 🇵🇱

319,778 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

During training, you visit many of the facilities that will eventually play a role in your mission. Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39A was one of them. This visit felt different. Standing at the base of the tower and looking up, I was reminded that this is the very place from which Neil Armstrong and his crewmates began their journey to the Moon. The facility has evolved over the decades and has been modernized for a new era of spaceflight, but it still carries the weight of its history. You can feel it. Then there is the elevator. Inside, there are only two buttons: Earth and Space. A simple design choice, perhaps, but one that feels remarkably profound when launch day finally arrives. What you see here is me at the top of the launch pad, with the Falcon 9 yet to make its way out. The rocket is transported to the pad horizontally and then raised to a vertical position before launch. Standing there, it was impossible not to imagine the events that would soon unfold. At this very time last year, all of this was happening in real time. Looking back now, it feels both distant and incredibly close. #shux #space #shubhanshushukla #india #axiom4
0:18

During training, you visit many of the facilities that will eventually play a role in your mission. Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39A was one of them. This visit felt different. Standing at the base of the tower and looking up, I was reminded that this is the very place from which Neil Armstrong and his crewmates began their journey to the Moon. The facility has evolved over the decades and has been modernized for a new era of spaceflight, but it still carries the weight of its history. You can feel it. Then there is the elevator. Inside, there are only two buttons: Earth and Space. A simple design choice, perhaps, but one that feels remarkably profound when launch day finally arrives. What you see here is me at the top of the launch pad, with the Falcon 9 yet to make its way out. The rocket is transported to the pad horizontally and then raised to a vertical position before launch. Standing there, it was impossible not to imagine the events that would soon unfold. At this very time last year, all of this was happening in real time. Looking back now, it feels both distant and incredibly close. #shux #space #shubhanshushukla #india #axiom4

Shubhanshu Shukla

13,600 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

[Q]: Can you tell us how this free economic zone would work in the Donbas, in land that the Russians took by force? President Trump: I don't want to do that now. It's a very complex situation, but it would work. And a lot of people want to see it work.
0:16

[Q]: Can you tell us how this free economic zone would work in the Donbas, in land that the Russians took by force? President Trump: I don't want to do that now. It's a very complex situation, but it would work. And a lot of people want to see it work.

Anton Gerashchenko

220,466 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Dear UEFA, UEFA Champions League I am just trying to understand the rules at this point… Same foul, different outcomes… are we missing a page in the rulebook or are we just wearing the wrong badge? Because it’s becoming a pattern at this point. When it’s against us, it’s waved off instantly; no second look, no VAR check, nothing. But in other games, similar incidents are reviewed and given without hesitation. So we have to ask what exactly is the standard here? And more importantly, does that standard apply equally to everyone? At this point, it’s only fair to wonder… is there something we’re not being told? Is there an agenda against Barça, or is there a reason these decisions consistently go the same way? We’re not even asking for favors, just transparency, consistency, and the same level of scrutiny every other team seems to get. Are we asking for too much???💔
0:11

Dear UEFA, UEFA Champions League I am just trying to understand the rules at this point… Same foul, different outcomes… are we missing a page in the rulebook or are we just wearing the wrong badge? Because it’s becoming a pattern at this point. When it’s against us, it’s waved off instantly; no second look, no VAR check, nothing. But in other games, similar incidents are reviewed and given without hesitation. So we have to ask what exactly is the standard here? And more importantly, does that standard apply equally to everyone? At this point, it’s only fair to wonder… is there something we’re not being told? Is there an agenda against Barça, or is there a reason these decisions consistently go the same way? We’re not even asking for favors, just transparency, consistency, and the same level of scrutiny every other team seems to get. Are we asking for too much???💔

Morenikeji

39,497 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Topic: Science and the Fullness of Life. Quote 1: Rejecting science is easy. Understanding it is hard. Yet only this path leads to fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Rejecting science is easy. It requires no effort, no study, and no discomfort. You can simply dismiss it and stay within familiar beliefs. Understanding science, however, is hard work. It demands time, intellectual honesty, and the willingness to change your mind when evidence shows you were wrong. Yet the author insists this harder path is the only one that leads to a full life. Science is not just a collection of facts. It is the most reliable way we have to understand reality, our origins, our world, our possibilities. Embracing it opens the door to wonder, clearer thinking, and better decisions. It frees us from illusion and gives us the tools to solve real problems. A life lived in deliberate ignorance stays small. A life guided by scientific understanding expands. The choice, though difficult, is clear. Quote 2: Science is hard to understand, yet without it there is no fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Science is hard to understand. It takes real effort, patience, and the courage to question old beliefs. Many prefer to avoid that struggle. Yet the author is clear: without science, there is no fullness of life. Rejecting it or staying ignorant leaves a person trapped in a smaller, less accurate picture of reality. Understanding it, however difficult, brings clarity, wonder, and the ability to engage with the world as it truly is. A life shaped by scientific knowledge is richer. It sharpens thinking, solves real problems, and deepens appreciation for existence. The path is demanding, but the alternative is a diminished existence, one cut off from truth and possibility. Science may be hard, but it is the only road to a complete and meaningful life.
0:11

Topic: Science and the Fullness of Life. Quote 1: Rejecting science is easy. Understanding it is hard. Yet only this path leads to fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Rejecting science is easy. It requires no effort, no study, and no discomfort. You can simply dismiss it and stay within familiar beliefs. Understanding science, however, is hard work. It demands time, intellectual honesty, and the willingness to change your mind when evidence shows you were wrong. Yet the author insists this harder path is the only one that leads to a full life. Science is not just a collection of facts. It is the most reliable way we have to understand reality, our origins, our world, our possibilities. Embracing it opens the door to wonder, clearer thinking, and better decisions. It frees us from illusion and gives us the tools to solve real problems. A life lived in deliberate ignorance stays small. A life guided by scientific understanding expands. The choice, though difficult, is clear. Quote 2: Science is hard to understand, yet without it there is no fullness of life. Author: Zafar Mirzo. Science is hard to understand. It takes real effort, patience, and the courage to question old beliefs. Many prefer to avoid that struggle. Yet the author is clear: without science, there is no fullness of life. Rejecting it or staying ignorant leaves a person trapped in a smaller, less accurate picture of reality. Understanding it, however difficult, brings clarity, wonder, and the ability to engage with the world as it truly is. A life shaped by scientific knowledge is richer. It sharpens thinking, solves real problems, and deepens appreciation for existence. The path is demanding, but the alternative is a diminished existence, one cut off from truth and possibility. Science may be hard, but it is the only road to a complete and meaningful life.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

2,787,481 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Just one little mistake blew his cover, This Scene was intense 🔥🎞️🎬🍿* In a room full of laughter, drinks, and forced normalcy, one small gesture quietly shifts the entire atmosphere. When Lt. Hicox orders three glasses, he does it the way a British officer would-subtly, instinctively. But in that moment, he forgets where he is. In Germany, even something as simple as showing the number three has its own identity, its own cultural fingerprint. And that tiny difference? It's loude than a gunshot to someone like Major Hellstrom. What makes this scene unforgettable isn't the violence that follows, but the silence before it-the way suspicion creeps in, the way eyes start to observe more than they listen. Hellstrom doesn't react immediately. He studies, processes, and then calmly pulls the thread that unravels everything. No raised voice, no dramatic reveal-just intelligence meeting instinct. It's a reminder that in war, survival isn't just about strength or strategy-it's about details. The smallest slip, the slightest inconsistency, can expose you completely. And in Tarantino's world, danger doesn't always announce itself with chaos... sometimes, it arrives with a smile, a question, and three fingers held the wrong way. A masterclass in suspense, where a single gesture becomes a death sentence.* #ingloriousbastards
0:16

Just one little mistake blew his cover, This Scene was intense 🔥🎞️🎬🍿* In a room full of laughter, drinks, and forced normalcy, one small gesture quietly shifts the entire atmosphere. When Lt. Hicox orders three glasses, he does it the way a British officer would-subtly, instinctively. But in that moment, he forgets where he is. In Germany, even something as simple as showing the number three has its own identity, its own cultural fingerprint. And that tiny difference? It's loude than a gunshot to someone like Major Hellstrom. What makes this scene unforgettable isn't the violence that follows, but the silence before it-the way suspicion creeps in, the way eyes start to observe more than they listen. Hellstrom doesn't react immediately. He studies, processes, and then calmly pulls the thread that unravels everything. No raised voice, no dramatic reveal-just intelligence meeting instinct. It's a reminder that in war, survival isn't just about strength or strategy-it's about details. The smallest slip, the slightest inconsistency, can expose you completely. And in Tarantino's world, danger doesn't always announce itself with chaos... sometimes, it arrives with a smile, a question, and three fingers held the wrong way. A masterclass in suspense, where a single gesture becomes a death sentence.* #ingloriousbastards

DailyFacts 🕸️

12,715 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

According to this Hamas supporter, what happened in Gaza was a genocide of horrific proportions that will forever scar the people and the land they live on. But, at the same time, Israel completely failed to fight Hamas and was decimated by the brave "freedom fighters" to an embarrassing degree. How can these two statements be true at the same time? It's simple. You just have to completely disassociate from reality.
0:16

According to this Hamas supporter, what happened in Gaza was a genocide of horrific proportions that will forever scar the people and the land they live on. But, at the same time, Israel completely failed to fight Hamas and was decimated by the brave "freedom fighters" to an embarrassing degree. How can these two statements be true at the same time? It's simple. You just have to completely disassociate from reality.

Hen Mazzig

24,513 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

World Models are the path for some AI Models in the future. But how can we efficiently train these models to not only see the world the way humans do but to see the world in a new and unique way. By visualizing, what is normally sequenced audio patterns, we can derive much more insights. Here we see Paganini in a visual form that can than be described and transcribed into a World Model. We can observe connections in a manner that may not have been clear prior to the digitalization of music and sound in this way. The company with the most valuable potential in building a World Model is Tesla. Not that this type of visualization is being used, but that the mechanisms are in place, and the technology is in place for the company to thrive in this new form of AI.
0:19

World Models are the path for some AI Models in the future. But how can we efficiently train these models to not only see the world the way humans do but to see the world in a new and unique way. By visualizing, what is normally sequenced audio patterns, we can derive much more insights. Here we see Paganini in a visual form that can than be described and transcribed into a World Model. We can observe connections in a manner that may not have been clear prior to the digitalization of music and sound in this way. The company with the most valuable potential in building a World Model is Tesla. Not that this type of visualization is being used, but that the mechanisms are in place, and the technology is in place for the company to thrive in this new form of AI.

Brian Roemmele

57,454 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Opposition in the batters box isn't just a layer of complexity, an obstacle to overcome, it is the central feature that gives meaning to movement. My sense is that many in the baseball community view the live batter as a linear step to master after mastering other lower complexity pieces, instead of the central feature that we design our training environments around. Part of me understands why this is the case. Pitching is in a challenging place training wise because the behavior of pitches, movements, etc. change so much when you go low effort. In addition we have some limits on volume each day due to throwing being the single fastest movement in sports. Other sports can do unique warmups to work on interpersonal distance (football/basketball/soccer) and tagging games for more of a martial arts context. I simply can't have all 100 throws of a pitchers workload that day be to a live batter. And while I see value in pulling an athlete out of context at times to work on different things, ultimately, the entirety of my paradigm to train pitchers is how to do the real thing MORE, to keep them embedded in a representative environment, rather than treating it as the final step in a linear progression.
0:11

Opposition in the batters box isn't just a layer of complexity, an obstacle to overcome, it is the central feature that gives meaning to movement. My sense is that many in the baseball community view the live batter as a linear step to master after mastering other lower complexity pieces, instead of the central feature that we design our training environments around. Part of me understands why this is the case. Pitching is in a challenging place training wise because the behavior of pitches, movements, etc. change so much when you go low effort. In addition we have some limits on volume each day due to throwing being the single fastest movement in sports. Other sports can do unique warmups to work on interpersonal distance (football/basketball/soccer) and tagging games for more of a martial arts context. I simply can't have all 100 throws of a pitchers workload that day be to a live batter. And while I see value in pulling an athlete out of context at times to work on different things, ultimately, the entirety of my paradigm to train pitchers is how to do the real thing MORE, to keep them embedded in a representative environment, rather than treating it as the final step in a linear progression.

Kyle Dupic

50,089 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Starlink is one of those rare technologies that feels like a cheat code for life. Plug it in, point it at the sky, and high-speed internet is literally beamed down to me from space. Technology is the closest thing we have to magic in the real world.
0:13

Starlink is one of those rare technologies that feels like a cheat code for life. Plug it in, point it at the sky, and high-speed internet is literally beamed down to me from space. Technology is the closest thing we have to magic in the real world.

Teslaconomics

14,571 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Australia. The Best F1 Season Opener. "It's amazing to see everyone here. And the energy is always awesome in Melbourne. I think this is definitely by far the best opener of a season. I mean, we had it in a few different places in the past, but this one, being that it's so far to get to, the weather's always great and the city's fantastic and the people are great."
0:18

Australia. The Best F1 Season Opener. "It's amazing to see everyone here. And the energy is always awesome in Melbourne. I think this is definitely by far the best opener of a season. I mean, we had it in a few different places in the past, but this one, being that it's so far to get to, the weather's always great and the city's fantastic and the people are great."

sim

34,682 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce