Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

IMMEDIATE RETRACTION REQUEST Last week, MSNOW anchor Jen Psaki falsely stated TWICE that I published the Ashley Biden diary. On MS Now (“The Briefing with Jen Psaki”), she claimed: “There’s also far-right political activist James O’Keefe… you might remember him as the leader of the group that published the... stolen diary of President Biden’s daughter, Ashley Biden, just days before the 2020 election.” On The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Psaki again stated: “…James O’Keefe, who you may remember from publishing Ashley Biden’s diary. He’s also in the press.” These statements are factually false. I did NOT publish the diary, nor did Project Veritas. In fact, Project Veritas declined to publish it specifically because it could not verify its authenticity at the time. The publication was done instead by the outlet National File, which openly confirmed this. Jen Psaki’s statements therefore constitute misinformation & misrepresent established facts. Because this falsehood was broadcast nationally on two major programs, we are formally requesting an immediate public retraction & correction on MSNOW. We look forward to her response. MS NOW Public Relations MS NOW The Briefing with Jen Psaki The Late Show Stephen Colbertshow more

James O'Keefe

3,559,581 subscribers

597,637 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The irrelevant propagandists at MS NOW and Morning Joe are spiraling because the new Pentagon Press Corps has officially replaced them! Jen Psaki Jen Psaki is lying to Stephen Colbert The Late Show about our briefing with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth because she knows it was off the record. The legacy media is furious they can no longer weaponize their access to solicit classified information and undermine our country. It’s over for them. They don’t get to filter the news anymore, because real independent journalists are inside the building, and we are reporting the facts directly to the American people.

The irrelevant propagandists at MS NOW and Morning Joe are spiraling because the new Pentagon Press Corps has officially replaced them! Jen Psaki Jen Psaki is lying to Stephen Colbert The Late Show about our briefing with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth because she knows it was off the record. The legacy media is furious they can no longer weaponize their access to solicit classified information and undermine our country. It’s over for them. They don’t get to filter the news anymore, because real independent journalists are inside the building, and we are reporting the facts directly to the American people.

Laura Loomer

135,313 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This is an extremely clear example of how the MSM lies and pushes false narratives. CBS did not prohibit or block Colbert's show from airing the Talarico interview. CBS just informed him that if he had Talarico on, he might have to have Jasmine Crockett on too. Last night Jen Psaki opened her show by reading a statement from CBS that said the network DID NOT prohibit Colbert from airing the interview. Psaki then spent almost her entire show repeating the lie that CBS DID block Colbert from airing the interview. Psaki claimed that Trump's FCC came up with a "new rule" to stop late night shows from having politicians on. Psaki's show ended with Jasmine Crockett, of all people, telling the truth, that CBS was not blocked from airing the Talarico interview. Colbert just didn't want to give her equal time on his show.

This is an extremely clear example of how the MSM lies and pushes false narratives. CBS did not prohibit or block Colbert's show from airing the Talarico interview. CBS just informed him that if he had Talarico on, he might have to have Jasmine Crockett on too. Last night Jen Psaki opened her show by reading a statement from CBS that said the network DID NOT prohibit Colbert from airing the interview. Psaki then spent almost her entire show repeating the lie that CBS DID block Colbert from airing the interview. Psaki claimed that Trump's FCC came up with a "new rule" to stop late night shows from having politicians on. Psaki's show ended with Jasmine Crockett, of all people, telling the truth, that CBS was not blocked from airing the Talarico interview. Colbert just didn't want to give her equal time on his show.

MAZE

235,148 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

If You’re Not Caught Up On Ashley Biden’s Diary I Suggest You Watch This. Ashley Biden’s Diary Phone Call Never Before Released To The Public “After years of public speculation and internal deliberation, we are finally releasing our conversation with Ashley Biden about her diary and other possessions. They were abandoned and later offered to Project Veritas. Hi, is this Ashley Biden? This is she. How are you? I'm doing well. Yeah, I just wanted to, sorry, I heard you have a few of my belongings. And so I was going to ask if you could please meet my friend, Eric who is down in Delray, if you could meet him and get this up to him. There's a diary here. It starts in January. It says, January at the end of a New York month, I'm sitting on a bed at the I-building. Yeah, so if you could just give everything that you have to Eric, that would be really great. I don't wanna give this to the wrong person. I mean, I want to make sure you add this point and I don't mean to say I don't want to have to get Secret Service involved in this right. Because it's just it's a whole process. But you know, I am actually Biden. It is my stuff. So if you could just get all of that over, I would really appreciate it. I know you sent a picture to my husband with a camera and a few other things that are mine as well. So that would be really great. Where is a good place for him to meet you? There's also this bag with luggage tags on it. Uh, for, and so is that bag, cause there's, there's all this stuff. Is that bag yours too, Ashley? Yeah, it is. Shortly after the phone call, this October 16th letter was sent from Project Veritas to Joe Biden's presidential campaign, asking the candidate for comment. October 23rd, a followup email from our then chief legal officer. And on October 29th, 2020. Ashley Biden's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, finally responded saying, quote, this is insane. We should send to the SDNY. This is the FBI splash page showing the SDNY immediately opened an investigation into project Veritas on the very same day. And on November 8th, 2020, project Veritas returns all Ashley Biden's abandoned items, including her diary to Florida local law enforcement. You're watching Predon Raids by the FBI on three Project Veritas journalists. They took place on November 4th and November 6th of 2021. I'm sorry. So what is this regarding? This is a senator on this c***. Open up. What are you doing with your hands? My hands are on. It's gone. No, what I'm saying here, it wasn't your right to. Just once again, for our safety for years, we're going to have an agency with you. Yeah. You do not have to be sent home. You're not being detained.” The video has more detail I had to cut from the transcription due to X’s text limits. It’s definitely worth the watch! Credit of course to James O'Keefe Project Veritas

If You’re Not Caught Up On Ashley Biden’s Diary I Suggest You Watch This. Ashley Biden’s Diary Phone Call Never Before Released To The Public “After years of public speculation and internal deliberation, we are finally releasing our conversation with Ashley Biden about her diary and other possessions. They were abandoned and later offered to Project Veritas. Hi, is this Ashley Biden? This is she. How are you? I'm doing well. Yeah, I just wanted to, sorry, I heard you have a few of my belongings. And so I was going to ask if you could please meet my friend, Eric who is down in Delray, if you could meet him and get this up to him. There's a diary here. It starts in January. It says, January at the end of a New York month, I'm sitting on a bed at the I-building. Yeah, so if you could just give everything that you have to Eric, that would be really great. I don't wanna give this to the wrong person. I mean, I want to make sure you add this point and I don't mean to say I don't want to have to get Secret Service involved in this right. Because it's just it's a whole process. But you know, I am actually Biden. It is my stuff. So if you could just get all of that over, I would really appreciate it. I know you sent a picture to my husband with a camera and a few other things that are mine as well. So that would be really great. Where is a good place for him to meet you? There's also this bag with luggage tags on it. Uh, for, and so is that bag, cause there's, there's all this stuff. Is that bag yours too, Ashley? Yeah, it is. Shortly after the phone call, this October 16th letter was sent from Project Veritas to Joe Biden's presidential campaign, asking the candidate for comment. October 23rd, a followup email from our then chief legal officer. And on October 29th, 2020. Ashley Biden's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, finally responded saying, quote, this is insane. We should send to the SDNY. This is the FBI splash page showing the SDNY immediately opened an investigation into project Veritas on the very same day. And on November 8th, 2020, project Veritas returns all Ashley Biden's abandoned items, including her diary to Florida local law enforcement. You're watching Predon Raids by the FBI on three Project Veritas journalists. They took place on November 4th and November 6th of 2021. I'm sorry. So what is this regarding? This is a senator on this c***. Open up. What are you doing with your hands? My hands are on. It's gone. No, what I'm saying here, it wasn't your right to. Just once again, for our safety for years, we're going to have an agency with you. Yeah. You do not have to be sent home. You're not being detained.” The video has more detail I had to cut from the transcription due to X’s text limits. It’s definitely worth the watch! Credit of course to James O'Keefe Project Veritas

Wall Street Apes

571,384 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

336,456 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Fox News plays a BRUTAL montage of left-wing media outlets running cover for former President Joe Biden’s RAPID DECLINE while now constantly questioning President Trump’s health and mental acuity. MS Now Jen Psaki (Biden) “There was an aggressive all-out pitching operation from the right-wing and from the Republicans about Joe Biden’s age and how he was in decline and sleeping in the Oval Office, a lot of which wasn’t true.” (Trump): “Trump appeared to be, shall we say, fighting to stay awake during the cabinet meeting.” CNN’s Abby Phillip (Biden): “I want to talk about the Joe Biden Republicans want you to see and the pipelines of videos that aren’t telling the full truth.” (Trump): “Donald Trump is well known to make a lot of verbal gaffes on a regular basis.” You don’t HATE the media enough!

Fox News plays a BRUTAL montage of left-wing media outlets running cover for former President Joe Biden’s RAPID DECLINE while now constantly questioning President Trump’s health and mental acuity. MS Now Jen Psaki (Biden) “There was an aggressive all-out pitching operation from the right-wing and from the Republicans about Joe Biden’s age and how he was in decline and sleeping in the Oval Office, a lot of which wasn’t true.” (Trump): “Trump appeared to be, shall we say, fighting to stay awake during the cabinet meeting.” CNN’s Abby Phillip (Biden): “I want to talk about the Joe Biden Republicans want you to see and the pipelines of videos that aren’t telling the full truth.” (Trump): “Donald Trump is well known to make a lot of verbal gaffes on a regular basis.” You don’t HATE the media enough!

RedWave Press

54,227 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

193,892 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

WATCH: Jen Psaki and Ben Rhodes hopelessly seethe at the indictment of Raúl Castro, to whom their boss personally offered his limp wrist in 2016. Note the gigantic lie about what causes scarcity in Cuba and note the multiple gratuitous potshots at the Cuban exile community. JEN PSAKI: Okay. I just want to start with the- the video that Secretary of State Marco Rubio put out today in Spanish. It was a Spanish-language message. What do you think? Who is the audience? What is he trying to achieve for this video? What did you make of it? BEN RHODES: Well, you know, Jen, as you remember, I negotiated the normalization of relations with Cuba, including with Raul Castro, directly. Traveled to Havana with you and President Obama in 2016. So I've thought a lot about this. That video was extraordinary in its hubris, tone,-deafness and hypocrisy. I think the audience for that video was not the Cuban people, most of whom probably won't even see it. The audience was kind of Rubio's own political base. The more hardline Cuban Americans, mainly in south Florida, who have wanted there to be a regime change since the Bay of Pigs invasion, when this was last attempted in the Kennedy administration. And just very quickly to go through it, the absurdity of it. Look, I'm not here to defend the Cuban government, but the reality is the scarcity in Cuba is not because its leaders stole some money from the people. It's because there's been an embargo for decades that denies basic goods and denies Cuba access to the international financial system. And because there's been a full blockade on Cuba for months, which has denied them fuel, which has led to power shortages, which has killed people, because if you cut off power to hospitals, people die and children are malnourished. Second, the absurdity of him talking about the corruption of billions of dollars being stolen at the same time that Donald Trump, his family and his cronies have been looting literally the American treasury or leveraging American power to get billions of dollars in crypto companies. Nobody believes that this is some earnest anti-corruption agenda. And then lastly, do we really think these people are credible in delivering messages about human rights and democracy as they dismantle human rights and democracy at home? No. So this is about power. This is about treating the Western Hemisphere like our empire. And it's about something that no Americans, other than that small political political base of Rubio’s is interested in, which is yet another regime change operation.

WATCH: Jen Psaki and Ben Rhodes hopelessly seethe at the indictment of Raúl Castro, to whom their boss personally offered his limp wrist in 2016. Note the gigantic lie about what causes scarcity in Cuba and note the multiple gratuitous potshots at the Cuban exile community. JEN PSAKI: Okay. I just want to start with the- the video that Secretary of State Marco Rubio put out today in Spanish. It was a Spanish-language message. What do you think? Who is the audience? What is he trying to achieve for this video? What did you make of it? BEN RHODES: Well, you know, Jen, as you remember, I negotiated the normalization of relations with Cuba, including with Raul Castro, directly. Traveled to Havana with you and President Obama in 2016. So I've thought a lot about this. That video was extraordinary in its hubris, tone,-deafness and hypocrisy. I think the audience for that video was not the Cuban people, most of whom probably won't even see it. The audience was kind of Rubio's own political base. The more hardline Cuban Americans, mainly in south Florida, who have wanted there to be a regime change since the Bay of Pigs invasion, when this was last attempted in the Kennedy administration. And just very quickly to go through it, the absurdity of it. Look, I'm not here to defend the Cuban government, but the reality is the scarcity in Cuba is not because its leaders stole some money from the people. It's because there's been an embargo for decades that denies basic goods and denies Cuba access to the international financial system. And because there's been a full blockade on Cuba for months, which has denied them fuel, which has led to power shortages, which has killed people, because if you cut off power to hospitals, people die and children are malnourished. Second, the absurdity of him talking about the corruption of billions of dollars being stolen at the same time that Donald Trump, his family and his cronies have been looting literally the American treasury or leveraging American power to get billions of dollars in crypto companies. Nobody believes that this is some earnest anti-corruption agenda. And then lastly, do we really think these people are credible in delivering messages about human rights and democracy as they dismantle human rights and democracy at home? No. So this is about power. This is about treating the Western Hemisphere like our empire. And it's about something that no Americans, other than that small political political base of Rubio’s is interested in, which is yet another regime change operation.

Jorge Bonilla

147,199 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This was an extremely rare moment of clarity and inward reflection on MS NOW. When Jen Psaki asked co-host Eugene Daniels what the biggest takeaway was from the media and polling being completely wrong about Democrat Socialist Francesca Hong, he gave a surprisingly honest answer. He admitted the left-wing media had been chasing the “juiciest story” instead of simply letting voters tell them what was actually happening. PSAKI: “But what do you…what do you think this is saying right now about the electorate? Let me start with you, Eugene.” DANIELS: “I think part part of it is, I think, it’s more about us in the media that cover these things.” “We chase often what is the juiciest story that we can tell? What’s the clearest story that we can tell about this election? What’s the clearest story we can tell about this primary?” “Instead of sometimes just like letting the voters tell us what it is.” “What we heard from Will McDuffie on the ground is that like some people…weren’t interested in Francesca Hong to vote for.” “Just because someone goes to a rally does not mean they’re going to vote for that person on Tuesday, right?” “It doesn’t mean that they are going to actually think that person can be electable.” “And so we have to do a better job, as I think we do great here…but like the larger media ecosystem, in making sure that when we’re telling the stories, we’re telling all the stories.” “The exciting part of Francesca is like, oh out of nowhere! But then maybe that’s not the story of tonight.”

This was an extremely rare moment of clarity and inward reflection on MS NOW. When Jen Psaki asked co-host Eugene Daniels what the biggest takeaway was from the media and polling being completely wrong about Democrat Socialist Francesca Hong, he gave a surprisingly honest answer. He admitted the left-wing media had been chasing the “juiciest story” instead of simply letting voters tell them what was actually happening. PSAKI: “But what do you…what do you think this is saying right now about the electorate? Let me start with you, Eugene.” DANIELS: “I think part part of it is, I think, it’s more about us in the media that cover these things.” “We chase often what is the juiciest story that we can tell? What’s the clearest story that we can tell about this election? What’s the clearest story we can tell about this primary?” “Instead of sometimes just like letting the voters tell us what it is.” “What we heard from Will McDuffie on the ground is that like some people…weren’t interested in Francesca Hong to vote for.” “Just because someone goes to a rally does not mean they’re going to vote for that person on Tuesday, right?” “It doesn’t mean that they are going to actually think that person can be electable.” “And so we have to do a better job, as I think we do great here…but like the larger media ecosystem, in making sure that when we’re telling the stories, we’re telling all the stories.” “The exciting part of Francesca is like, oh out of nowhere! But then maybe that’s not the story of tonight.”

Overton

131,524 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

- I wanted to ask about the biological weapons development laboratories in Ukraine, which the Russians keep talking about. - Yes. - Could you explain to us what the Pentagon's involvement is or was in this matter? When was the last time we cooperated with the Ukrainians on this issue? And how would you comment on the accusations from Russia? - The accusations from Russia are absurd and ridiculous. As my grandfather, who was a Catholic and an Irishman, would say... it's a complete lie! These accusations are unfounded. A textbook example of Russian propaganda. If I were you, I wouldn't waste a drop of ink on covering this topic. People like Kirby and Psaki have done their department a disservice. They've opened the world's eyes to the fact that people are being lied to from this podium. Openly and shamelessly. They lie every time they open their mouths. It's not that we didn't know this, but now everyone knows it.

- I wanted to ask about the biological weapons development laboratories in Ukraine, which the Russians keep talking about. - Yes. - Could you explain to us what the Pentagon's involvement is or was in this matter? When was the last time we cooperated with the Ukrainians on this issue? And how would you comment on the accusations from Russia? - The accusations from Russia are absurd and ridiculous. As my grandfather, who was a Catholic and an Irishman, would say... it's a complete lie! These accusations are unfounded. A textbook example of Russian propaganda. If I were you, I wouldn't waste a drop of ink on covering this topic. People like Kirby and Psaki have done their department a disservice. They've opened the world's eyes to the fact that people are being lied to from this podium. Openly and shamelessly. They lie every time they open their mouths. It's not that we didn't know this, but now everyone knows it.

S p r i n t e r

17,507 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BOMBSHELL: Congressional report outlines structure of ‘censorship industrial complex’ The House Judiciary Committee released a damning report a week ago proving what we have known all along: that government forces sought to silence and deplatform voices on the right during the 2020 election and beyond, including yours truly. You’ll remember back when I was with Project Veritas that I SUED the Election Integrity Project in Washington State, at Stanford and the University of Washington. However, a judge moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the statements about Veritas are not actionable because they are not factual statements, because they are not capable of being proven true, and because the academic researcher’s statements “lack precision.” The district court concluded that readers of Stanford and the University of Washington’s academic analysis would have expected to encounter analysis that reflected the authors’ “subjective biases,” including “mischaracterizations and exaggerations,” and thus the specific statements that Project Veritas took issue with were not actionable for defamation because they were not “capable of verification or refutation by means of objective proof.” In the judge’s order dismissing our lawsuit, he notes the statement that our video had been “debunked” is incapable of being proven true or false." “A reasonable inference to be drawn from the complaint," Thomas S Zilly, US District Judge ,concluded, "is that readers of the EIP blog post would have had some awareness of the allegedly left-leaning biases of the authors." The most chilling part is, the government has no plans to stop this unconstitutional “Election Integrity Partnership” censoring program. Expect to see more of the same into the new year, when the election really gets underway. #censorship #misinformation #disinformation #firstamendment

BOMBSHELL: Congressional report outlines structure of ‘censorship industrial complex’ The House Judiciary Committee released a damning report a week ago proving what we have known all along: that government forces sought to silence and deplatform voices on the right during the 2020 election and beyond, including yours truly. You’ll remember back when I was with Project Veritas that I SUED the Election Integrity Project in Washington State, at Stanford and the University of Washington. However, a judge moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the statements about Veritas are not actionable because they are not factual statements, because they are not capable of being proven true, and because the academic researcher’s statements “lack precision.” The district court concluded that readers of Stanford and the University of Washington’s academic analysis would have expected to encounter analysis that reflected the authors’ “subjective biases,” including “mischaracterizations and exaggerations,” and thus the specific statements that Project Veritas took issue with were not actionable for defamation because they were not “capable of verification or refutation by means of objective proof.” In the judge’s order dismissing our lawsuit, he notes the statement that our video had been “debunked” is incapable of being proven true or false." “A reasonable inference to be drawn from the complaint," Thomas S Zilly, US District Judge ,concluded, "is that readers of the EIP blog post would have had some awareness of the allegedly left-leaning biases of the authors." The most chilling part is, the government has no plans to stop this unconstitutional “Election Integrity Partnership” censoring program. Expect to see more of the same into the new year, when the election really gets underway. #censorship #misinformation #disinformation #firstamendment

James O'Keefe

641,179 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

JEN MCCABE ADMITS SHE KNEW WHERE JOHN WAS. Jen claims to have known John wasn’t at Tom Beatty’s that morning after calling Tom looking for him. Hence why Jen says she didn’t end up driving by Tom’s house to check for John, which is located much closer to Jen’s house than #JohnOKeefe’s Meadow’s Ave house is. #KarenRead How would Jen McCabe have known John was NOT at Tom Beatty’s before 6am—given she didn’t actually speak with Tom Beatty for the first time that day until 1:31:13pm, several hours after John’s body was found at 6:03am—if it weren’t because she already knew where John WAS that morning when Karen first called her? Jen McCabe even told State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince, in her February 1, 2022 interview, that right after Karen had first called her that morning, she “began to think of other friends that John might have ended up going to such as Tom Beatty but he was not there either.” —————— JEN MCCABE TESTIFIES: Jen McCabe: “So then I start calling Tom.” ADA Adam Lally: “And at any point in time that you called Tom, did Tom pick up the phone? Did you speak with him?” Jen McCabe: “He did not.” ADA Adam Lally: “And so, following that, what did you do?” … Jen McCabe: “I then go downstairs. Matt gets up. He’s starting to get dressed. I go downstairs. I make a coffee…” —————— JEN’S CALL LOG: - 5:33:47am — Jen first calls Tom Beatty. - 5:52:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. - 5:57:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. —————— If Jen never spoke to Tom Beatty that morning before finding John’s body at 34 Fairview at 6:03am, then how would Jen have known John was NOT there (at Tom Beatty’s house) before finding his body (at 34 Fairview), if Jen McCabe didn’t already know where John’s body was? Maybe it’s because Jen did in fact know where John O’Keefe’s body was, before she’d ever “found” it with Karen Read. But this “guilty knowledge”, if you will, is only reaffirmed by the fact that hours before, Jen McCabe Google searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27:40am. Is Jen McCabe a psychic too with her Google searching, predictive of how exactly John O’Keefe would be found dying outside in the cold? Or, as common sense would tell us: it’s because Jen McCabe knew. She had “guilty knowledge”. There’s only one way one would know where John O’Keefe was NOT that morning, before his body was found, and that’s if they already knew where he WAS. Perhaps this is another reason why the Commonwealth doesn’t have one of its own State Police investigators, Kathleen Prince, who conducted Jen McCabe’s interview on February 1, 2022 (where she discusses Tom Beatty), on its witness list. But the defense has her on theirs! 😉 #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeforJohnOkeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

JEN MCCABE ADMITS SHE KNEW WHERE JOHN WAS. Jen claims to have known John wasn’t at Tom Beatty’s that morning after calling Tom looking for him. Hence why Jen says she didn’t end up driving by Tom’s house to check for John, which is located much closer to Jen’s house than #JohnOKeefe’s Meadow’s Ave house is. #KarenRead How would Jen McCabe have known John was NOT at Tom Beatty’s before 6am—given she didn’t actually speak with Tom Beatty for the first time that day until 1:31:13pm, several hours after John’s body was found at 6:03am—if it weren’t because she already knew where John WAS that morning when Karen first called her? Jen McCabe even told State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince, in her February 1, 2022 interview, that right after Karen had first called her that morning, she “began to think of other friends that John might have ended up going to such as Tom Beatty but he was not there either.” —————— JEN MCCABE TESTIFIES: Jen McCabe: “So then I start calling Tom.” ADA Adam Lally: “And at any point in time that you called Tom, did Tom pick up the phone? Did you speak with him?” Jen McCabe: “He did not.” ADA Adam Lally: “And so, following that, what did you do?” … Jen McCabe: “I then go downstairs. Matt gets up. He’s starting to get dressed. I go downstairs. I make a coffee…” —————— JEN’S CALL LOG: - 5:33:47am — Jen first calls Tom Beatty. - 5:52:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. - 5:57:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. —————— If Jen never spoke to Tom Beatty that morning before finding John’s body at 34 Fairview at 6:03am, then how would Jen have known John was NOT there (at Tom Beatty’s house) before finding his body (at 34 Fairview), if Jen McCabe didn’t already know where John’s body was? Maybe it’s because Jen did in fact know where John O’Keefe’s body was, before she’d ever “found” it with Karen Read. But this “guilty knowledge”, if you will, is only reaffirmed by the fact that hours before, Jen McCabe Google searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27:40am. Is Jen McCabe a psychic too with her Google searching, predictive of how exactly John O’Keefe would be found dying outside in the cold? Or, as common sense would tell us: it’s because Jen McCabe knew. She had “guilty knowledge”. There’s only one way one would know where John O’Keefe was NOT that morning, before his body was found, and that’s if they already knew where he WAS. Perhaps this is another reason why the Commonwealth doesn’t have one of its own State Police investigators, Kathleen Prince, who conducted Jen McCabe’s interview on February 1, 2022 (where she discusses Tom Beatty), on its witness list. But the defense has her on theirs! 😉 #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeforJohnOkeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

200,650 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Judicial Watch sues CIA for records on agency's endorsement of letter falsely linking Hunter Biden laptop to Russian disinformation and former DNI John Ratcliffe sheds light on the U.S. intel community interfering in the 2016 and 2020 election: Ratcliffe: "There was this coordinated campaign to mislead the American voter right before the election... Clearly, the intel community, specifically the CIA, played a role in that. These 51 former intel officials not only put out this letter that was deliberately false and intended to mislead the American voters but the facts and evidence show now that they had help within the CIA with actual CIA employees who supported and solicited signatures for a letter that they knew to be false... There ought to be focus on the intel community because both in 2016 and 2020, you did have attempts to interfere in the election. I declassified John Brennan's notes from 2016, where he briefed President Obama, VP Biden, and the entire Obama admin that it was not the Russians but Hillary Clinton that created the Russia collusion narrative. And then in 2020, you had the Hunter Biden laptop interference..." @JohnRatcliffe Tom Fitton Rachel Campos-Duffy

Judicial Watch sues CIA for records on agency's endorsement of letter falsely linking Hunter Biden laptop to Russian disinformation and former DNI John Ratcliffe sheds light on the U.S. intel community interfering in the 2016 and 2020 election: Ratcliffe: "There was this coordinated campaign to mislead the American voter right before the election... Clearly, the intel community, specifically the CIA, played a role in that. These 51 former intel officials not only put out this letter that was deliberately false and intended to mislead the American voters but the facts and evidence show now that they had help within the CIA with actual CIA employees who supported and solicited signatures for a letter that they knew to be false... There ought to be focus on the intel community because both in 2016 and 2020, you did have attempts to interfere in the election. I declassified John Brennan's notes from 2016, where he briefed President Obama, VP Biden, and the entire Obama admin that it was not the Russians but Hillary Clinton that created the Russia collusion narrative. And then in 2020, you had the Hunter Biden laptop interference..." @JohnRatcliffe Tom Fitton Rachel Campos-Duffy

KanekoaTheGreat

284,195 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Former Secretary of State John Kerry tells Jen Psaki — with a straight face — that Obama’s disastrous Iran deal was the strongest nuclear agreement EVER made. Kerry then lamented the fact that President Trump eliminated Ali Khamenei and his wife. KERRY: “A number of years ago, when President Obama decided that we were going to try to resolve this problem in a peaceful way, we took four years and we secured an agreement that is the strongest nuclear agreement on the planet.” “Strongest since the 1950s and 60s.” “We have enormous ability not to trust but to verify.” “So the tragedy of a president coming in after the United States did not fully keep its own side of the agreement of lifting all the sanctions, you wound up with, now a situation where you have killed the father, killed the the wife, killed the the brother.” “The ayatollah, we are told, the new one, is tougher, more conservative.” “And now the bombing has taken place and entire Iranian society and region have been really put under extraordinary tension.”

Former Secretary of State John Kerry tells Jen Psaki — with a straight face — that Obama’s disastrous Iran deal was the strongest nuclear agreement EVER made. Kerry then lamented the fact that President Trump eliminated Ali Khamenei and his wife. KERRY: “A number of years ago, when President Obama decided that we were going to try to resolve this problem in a peaceful way, we took four years and we secured an agreement that is the strongest nuclear agreement on the planet.” “Strongest since the 1950s and 60s.” “We have enormous ability not to trust but to verify.” “So the tragedy of a president coming in after the United States did not fully keep its own side of the agreement of lifting all the sanctions, you wound up with, now a situation where you have killed the father, killed the the wife, killed the the brother.” “The ayatollah, we are told, the new one, is tougher, more conservative.” “And now the bombing has taken place and entire Iranian society and region have been really put under extraordinary tension.”

Overton

75,288 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨NEW: Mark Halperin teams up with Marc Caputo to rip into "liberal media bias"🚨 CAPUTO: "Jen Psaki's hiring by MSNBC was one of the many examples of how utterly broken the Acela media industrial complex is. For the first time in United States history, a sitting president seeking reelection had his press secretary go and work for a major media enterprise and anchor a show. And no one f*cking said anything about how irregular, how newsworthy, how out of line that was." "So when we come to our current moment, Jen Psaki, MSNBC represents a very particular inflection point, as does the Biden presidency, in the way in which the press covered it, that leads us to where we are today." HALPERIN: "It's batsh*t crazy for these organizations, who claim to be serious news organizations, to have as their media reporters leading members of the resistance — unapologetic and explicit — who, to this day, have not written about Joe Biden, the lack of coverage of Joe Biden's loss of mental acuity — to this day, they have not written about the biggest media story of all time." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Mark Halperin teams up with Marc Caputo to rip into "liberal media bias"🚨 CAPUTO: "Jen Psaki's hiring by MSNBC was one of the many examples of how utterly broken the Acela media industrial complex is. For the first time in United States history, a sitting president seeking reelection had his press secretary go and work for a major media enterprise and anchor a show. And no one fcking said anything about how irregular, how newsworthy, how out of line that was." "So when we come to our current moment, Jen Psaki, MSNBC represents a very particular inflection point, as does the Biden presidency, in the way in which the press covered it, that leads us to where we are today." HALPERIN: "It's batsht crazy for these organizations, who claim to be serious news organizations, to have as their media reporters leading members of the resistance — unapologetic and explicit — who, to this day, have not written about Joe Biden, the lack of coverage of Joe Biden's loss of mental acuity — to this day, they have not written about the biggest media story of all time." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

105,059 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Do you really think any of the jurors in the #KarenReadTrial are going to believe that this woman, Jen McCabe, wouldn’t say anything at all to make #KarenRead look & sound bad? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, shows this much glee & excitement when the Judge gives them the green light to completely trash the defendant? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, is this eager to be able to turn to the jury and say something absolutely horrendous—designed to be hurtful—and what Jen herself described as being “horrific”? If Jen McCabe was so “horrified” by this nasty, mean-girl statement about Karen Read, wouldn’t she be equally, if not more mortified to then have to repeat it to the jury and the whole world? Or to have to repeat it in front of Karen Read herself? This is nasty, vicious, mean-girl type behavior, and Jen McCabe’s reaction of utter excitement and joy when the Judge allows her to say it is Jen revealing her true colors. Watching her testimony was exhausting, and I got to stop, pause and take breaks. I’m not even in the courtroom. Can you imagine how exhausting she was for the jurors? Fortunately for the rest of society—but unfortunately for Jen McCabe—she’s her own worst enemy. She clearly thought that landing this last blow on Karen Read would make Karen look bad, and divert attention away from the overwhelming abundance of evidence incriminating herself. Instead, Jen McCabe just solidified for the whole world that she has no heart and would say absolutely anything to hurt Karen Read and make her look bad. How does that get John O’Keefe justice? After several days of being evasive and exceptionally combative on the stand, contradicting her phone data, being impeached by her prior testimony & statements numerous times, being directly refuted by surveillance footage and insisting that every Police report & the third-party phone records are wrong—Jen McCabe did an effective job at thoroughly discrediting herself. Leaving everyone with this moment at the end of her testimony just reinforces that to Jen McCabe, Karen Read was disposable, unlike her family members. QUESTION: 👇🏼 Does Jen McCabe look “horrified”, or the opposite or “horrified” to you about having to share such a “horrific” statement with the jury? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Do you really think any of the jurors in the #KarenReadTrial are going to believe that this woman, Jen McCabe, wouldn’t say anything at all to make #KarenRead look & sound bad? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, shows this much glee & excitement when the Judge gives them the green light to completely trash the defendant? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, is this eager to be able to turn to the jury and say something absolutely horrendous—designed to be hurtful—and what Jen herself described as being “horrific”? If Jen McCabe was so “horrified” by this nasty, mean-girl statement about Karen Read, wouldn’t she be equally, if not more mortified to then have to repeat it to the jury and the whole world? Or to have to repeat it in front of Karen Read herself? This is nasty, vicious, mean-girl type behavior, and Jen McCabe’s reaction of utter excitement and joy when the Judge allows her to say it is Jen revealing her true colors. Watching her testimony was exhausting, and I got to stop, pause and take breaks. I’m not even in the courtroom. Can you imagine how exhausting she was for the jurors? Fortunately for the rest of society—but unfortunately for Jen McCabe—she’s her own worst enemy. She clearly thought that landing this last blow on Karen Read would make Karen look bad, and divert attention away from the overwhelming abundance of evidence incriminating herself. Instead, Jen McCabe just solidified for the whole world that she has no heart and would say absolutely anything to hurt Karen Read and make her look bad. How does that get John O’Keefe justice? After several days of being evasive and exceptionally combative on the stand, contradicting her phone data, being impeached by her prior testimony & statements numerous times, being directly refuted by surveillance footage and insisting that every Police report & the third-party phone records are wrong—Jen McCabe did an effective job at thoroughly discrediting herself. Leaving everyone with this moment at the end of her testimony just reinforces that to Jen McCabe, Karen Read was disposable, unlike her family members. QUESTION: 👇🏼 Does Jen McCabe look “horrified”, or the opposite or “horrified” to you about having to share such a “horrific” statement with the jury? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

216,165 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Scott Jennings on CBS cancelling ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’: “Look at the reporting on this on and off the record. Executives all over are saying we had to do it for financial reasons. This is a massive show with a massive staff. It’s losing a massive amount of money. This is the nature of the TV business right now. You just are not economically viable. If you’re supposed to be doing a comedy show, that’s not funny, that’s losing $50 million a year. I mean, only — only liberals, extreme liberals would think that we have to keep subsidizing partisan rants every night that are economically not viable just because. Why? It makes absolutely no financial sense. He works for a for-profit company. Don’t you have to turn a profit at some juncture? And he’s not doing it. And you know, there’s a lot of people in this general business right now who think that I exist to go after Donald Trump at all costs, But no one stops to think, do I exist to make money or not? Maybe these things aren’t compatible When you cut out half the country from your possible audience.”

.Scott Jennings on CBS cancelling ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’: “Look at the reporting on this on and off the record. Executives all over are saying we had to do it for financial reasons. This is a massive show with a massive staff. It’s losing a massive amount of money. This is the nature of the TV business right now. You just are not economically viable. If you’re supposed to be doing a comedy show, that’s not funny, that’s losing $50 million a year. I mean, only — only liberals, extreme liberals would think that we have to keep subsidizing partisan rants every night that are economically not viable just because. Why? It makes absolutely no financial sense. He works for a for-profit company. Don’t you have to turn a profit at some juncture? And he’s not doing it. And you know, there’s a lot of people in this general business right now who think that I exist to go after Donald Trump at all costs, But no one stops to think, do I exist to make money or not? Maybe these things aren’t compatible When you cut out half the country from your possible audience.”

Curtis Houck

407,414 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Green’s leader Chloe Swarbrick denies inciting violence. She claims the responsibility lies with “the three men in charge of the country”. Appearing on Herald Now with Ryan Bridge this morning, Chloe claimed she did not know the activist who publicised the Foreign Minister’s home address, and said she did not invite her to yesterday’s presser. During the interview, Ms Swarbrick presented herself sitting in a chair adorned with the keffiyeh. The scarf that has become the worldwide symbol of a group that advocates hate and violence and the total destruction of Israel. Members of Ms Swarbrick’s Green Party often wear keffiyeh’s into the NZ parliament’s debating chamber. They also wear them at every press conference or at any public appearance. They are also well known for chanting the Hamas war cry- “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. A war cry that has as its underlying meaning the total annihilation of the state of Israel. Ms Swarbrick’s protests are blame shifting deceit. Kudos to Mr Bridges for challenging her on this issue when most other legacy media are overwhelmingly sympathetic to Ms Swarbrick and her cause. As for the real world- if the Greens were in any way able to be part of it, Chloe Swarbrick would have resigned as party leader and MP yesterday.

Green’s leader Chloe Swarbrick denies inciting violence. She claims the responsibility lies with “the three men in charge of the country”. Appearing on Herald Now with Ryan Bridge this morning, Chloe claimed she did not know the activist who publicised the Foreign Minister’s home address, and said she did not invite her to yesterday’s presser. During the interview, Ms Swarbrick presented herself sitting in a chair adorned with the keffiyeh. The scarf that has become the worldwide symbol of a group that advocates hate and violence and the total destruction of Israel. Members of Ms Swarbrick’s Green Party often wear keffiyeh’s into the NZ parliament’s debating chamber. They also wear them at every press conference or at any public appearance. They are also well known for chanting the Hamas war cry- “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. A war cry that has as its underlying meaning the total annihilation of the state of Israel. Ms Swarbrick’s protests are blame shifting deceit. Kudos to Mr Bridges for challenging her on this issue when most other legacy media are overwhelmingly sympathetic to Ms Swarbrick and her cause. As for the real world- if the Greens were in any way able to be part of it, Chloe Swarbrick would have resigned as party leader and MP yesterday.

The Redbaiter

24,219 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

This Video Has Over Half A Million Likes TikTok Users Rallying To Vote Out All In This Corrupt Congress “We feel that right now, you are the greatest threat to national security. We also feel you are the most inept, corrupt, & useless group of employees in the entire country” “I am done letting a bunch of corrupt raisins who have never contributed anything useful to society make the rules for me. I am now a single issue voter. If you voted for this, not only will I not vote for you, I will actively vote against you, for anyone who did not. And I would do this even if I was not on TikTok, because you are trying to ban an application that half the country uses to get their news 180 days before an election. And you think that we don't know that that is the reason. I'm about to tell you how the people feel. We feel that right now, you are the greatest threat to national security. We also feel you are the most inept, corrupt, and useless group of employees in the entire country. And you can't seem to remember that you're employees. So if you're an incumbent and you voted for this, start looking for a job. Because you're done.”

This Video Has Over Half A Million Likes TikTok Users Rallying To Vote Out All In This Corrupt Congress “We feel that right now, you are the greatest threat to national security. We also feel you are the most inept, corrupt, & useless group of employees in the entire country” “I am done letting a bunch of corrupt raisins who have never contributed anything useful to society make the rules for me. I am now a single issue voter. If you voted for this, not only will I not vote for you, I will actively vote against you, for anyone who did not. And I would do this even if I was not on TikTok, because you are trying to ban an application that half the country uses to get their news 180 days before an election. And you think that we don't know that that is the reason. I'm about to tell you how the people feel. We feel that right now, you are the greatest threat to national security. We also feel you are the most inept, corrupt, and useless group of employees in the entire country. And you can't seem to remember that you're employees. So if you're an incumbent and you voted for this, start looking for a job. Because you're done.”

Wall Street Apes

298,870 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren