正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

IMO this is all that you really needed to know/hear from today when it came to Brad's thinking He does not feel like Jaylen is worth the 35% cap hit. Plain and simple. At a lower cap hit? Sure. At 35%? Clearly the answer is no Now, whether they... show more

Dan Greenberg

146,412 subscribers

217,825 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Brian Windhorst: "It wasn't that the league doesn't think Jaylen Brown is a great player or an excellent player, is that the league doesn't value what he produces at his salary slot ($57M). And that is why he was traded and that is why he was traded for relatively so little"

Brian Windhorst: "It wasn't that the league doesn't think Jaylen Brown is a great player or an excellent player, is that the league doesn't value what he produces at his salary slot ($57M). And that is why he was traded and that is why he was traded for relatively so little"

Oh No He Didn't

456,044 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,138 次观看 • 4 个月前

Shuler: Are we now saying that this is what we’re getting to, that an athlete can’t use professional judgment without an AI system evaluating them at every turn and saying whether they made the right decision to make a pass to this player or that player? Collective bargaining is the tool that really undergirds this and gives workers a seat at the table to determine how that data is used.

Shuler: Are we now saying that this is what we’re getting to, that an athlete can’t use professional judgment without an AI system evaluating them at every turn and saying whether they made the right decision to make a pass to this player or that player? Collective bargaining is the tool that really undergirds this and gives workers a seat at the table to determine how that data is used.

Acyn

35,700 次观看 • 7 个月前

.Adam Schefter laid out how much depth is in the 2025 NFL draft 👀 "The player you get at No. 10 in this draft is similar to the player that you get at 35."

.Adam Schefter laid out how much depth is in the 2025 NFL draft 👀 "The player you get at No. 10 in this draft is similar to the player that you get at 35."

NFL on ESPN

768,720 次观看 • 1 年前

An anonymous NBA GM on the Jaylen Brown trade “This is a classic case of the credit goes to the guy who scores but they're not driving team success. There's guys like this all over the league, the difference is he's not at $40M... he's at $60M. It's really hard to tie up that much money in your salary cap for one player unless they're truly generational, and he's not even close to that. Also, the league is getting smarter now. And here's the thing: the dumb teams are the cheap teams.” (Via Tim MacMahon)

An anonymous NBA GM on the Jaylen Brown trade “This is a classic case of the credit goes to the guy who scores but they're not driving team success. There's guys like this all over the league, the difference is he's not at $40M... he's at $60M. It's really hard to tie up that much money in your salary cap for one player unless they're truly generational, and he's not even close to that. Also, the league is getting smarter now. And here's the thing: the dumb teams are the cheap teams.” (Via Tim MacMahon)

NBABase

400,843 次观看 • 1 个月前

Imagine leaving the dealer after picking up your new car, your are amazed and distracted at the features of the car and how comfortable it is. All of a sudden you feel a spine jarring impact and hear multiple parts of the car crunching, the wheel is now wobbling and making noises. Before you know it, you realize you had just hit a massive pothole. Is it a sign that this car wasn’t meant for you or is it time to take it to the city and demand they repair it?

Imagine leaving the dealer after picking up your new car, your are amazed and distracted at the features of the car and how comfortable it is. All of a sudden you feel a spine jarring impact and hear multiple parts of the car crunching, the wheel is now wobbling and making noises. Before you know it, you realize you had just hit a massive pothole. Is it a sign that this car wasn’t meant for you or is it time to take it to the city and demand they repair it?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

768,646 次观看 • 7 个月前

While I agree a $35 burger is just wrong, you ate it and you still need to pay for it. This woman ate at a Hyatt Airport restaurant and then tried to leave without paying the bill. She soon finds out what theft of services is. What was she thinking—that she could get away with it? Clearly not all there. Part 2 in comments below.

While I agree a $35 burger is just wrong, you ate it and you still need to pay for it. This woman ate at a Hyatt Airport restaurant and then tried to leave without paying the bill. She soon finds out what theft of services is. What was she thinking—that she could get away with it? Clearly not all there. Part 2 in comments below.

Suzee Q

609,358 次观看 • 4 个月前

"They do need a pay rise but 35% is a stretch." Lin Mei states that being a junior doctor "is like in any other field a graduate or apprentice." She highlights that the average graduate salary is £25K, much lower than a doctor's. Kevin Maguire stresses it's not the same.

"They do need a pay rise but 35% is a stretch." Lin Mei states that being a junior doctor "is like in any other field a graduate or apprentice." She highlights that the average graduate salary is £25K, much lower than a doctor's. Kevin Maguire stresses it's not the same.

Jeremy Vine & Daytime on 5

72,221 次观看 • 3 年前

🇦🇲🇦🇿🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Jeffrey Sachs on Armenia surrendering its south, the border with Iran, to NATO control: "Armenia says to the United States, "Sure, you take this land right on Iran's border. We know that you're at war with Iran. We know that your ally Israel is at war with Iran. We know that Azerbaijan is an ally of Israel. That seems like a real way to push Armenia into a war. I frankly do not understand what the Armenian political leadership is thinking, but this is a very provocative and dangerous move. If you look at it purely from a geopolitical perspective, it is basically putting Armenia into Israel's war against Iran. Is that really what Armenia wants to do?"

🇦🇲🇦🇿🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Jeffrey Sachs on Armenia surrendering its south, the border with Iran, to NATO control: "Armenia says to the United States, "Sure, you take this land right on Iran's border. We know that you're at war with Iran. We know that your ally Israel is at war with Iran. We know that Azerbaijan is an ally of Israel. That seems like a real way to push Armenia into a war. I frankly do not understand what the Armenian political leadership is thinking, but this is a very provocative and dangerous move. If you look at it purely from a geopolitical perspective, it is basically putting Armenia into Israel's war against Iran. Is that really what Armenia wants to do?"

Prince du Karabaque

103,897 次观看 • 1 年前

I did years as a professional Russian swimmer .... And I know what is needed and the demands to be at the top of any sport. The world is different today. . But not that different

I did years as a professional Russian swimmer .... And I know what is needed and the demands to be at the top of any sport. The world is different today. . But not that different

Elisabeth Eliseeva 🇷🇺 SPUTNIK

225,483 次观看 • 6 个月前

“It is not that Drake Maye, now, is in the discussion with Stafford, it’s quite the opposite... Now, we have a player…in the game explaining how he is not at all like Matthew Stafford.” nick wright explains:

“It is not that Drake Maye, now, is in the discussion with Stafford, it’s quite the opposite... Now, we have a player…in the game explaining how he is not at all like Matthew Stafford.” nick wright explains:

First Things First

87,170 次观看 • 6 个月前

they're just dancing and having fun? jesus christ was not this woke or boring + YOU are at fault when you're the one implying that simple dancing between straight women is sexual. you know the song is a hit when discourses like these drop on the timeline.

they're just dancing and having fun? jesus christ was not this woke or boring + YOU are at fault when you're the one implying that simple dancing between straight women is sexual. you know the song is a hit when discourses like these drop on the timeline.

໊ ꕤ

149,111 次观看 • 4 个月前

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

.David Deutsch: "What's currently called AI and AGI are not only different from each other, they are very close to being the exact opposites of each other. The reason is that an AI, current AI is like an AI that diagnoses diseases or an AI that plays chess or an AI that controls a huge factory. Those things have objective functions, that is they have a function that they are designed to maximize and that is why they are used in those particular applications. Or in military terms, you could say the objective is to hit the target. You might say the objective is to hit the target unless some thing specified, but it's a specified thing comes up in which case don't hit the target and so on. This is, as I said, almost the opposite of what humans do when humans think. For a start, the AI has to be obedient, that is it has to actually do the things it is programmed to do, whereas a human is fundamentally disobedient, especially when being creative. When a human plays chess, they are performing a completely different kind of computation. They don't do the same things, they don't investigate the same possibilities that the artificial chess playing machine does, because the artificial one is capable of looking at billions and billions of possibilities, whereas the human can only look at hundreds or something. They are doing something completely different. Another difference is that the human can explain, can write a book later, having become world champion, can write a book saying how I did it, as the computer program that beats the world champion can write no such book, because it has no idea how it did it. It was just following a program. I was doing this and that and that and none of that is illuminating. Also, third thing, the chess player can decide I don't want to play chess anymore, from now on I will play Go or from now on I will play tennis. If commanded to play chess, the functionality will deteriorate completely. Those things are different. What we want in an AGI is that it behaves in a way that cannot be specified in advance, because if you specified it, you would already have the answer. The AGI program has to give unexpected answers, answers to questions we didn't even know how to ask."

Deutsch Explains

72,475 次观看 • 1 年前

What Happens When AI Tokens Cost More Than Your Employees? @jason: “We, with our agents, hit $300/day per agent using the Claude API, like instantly. And that was doing, maybe, 10 or 20%. That's $100k/year per agent.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “We're getting to a place where we have to basically now say, ‘What is the token budget that we're willing to give our best devs?’” “And then if you aggregate it across all people, you can clearly see a trend where you're like, ‘Well, hold on a second, now they need to be at least 2x as productive as another employee.’” “That is actively happening inside my business, because otherwise I'll run out of money.” Jason: “Yeah. This is a very interesting trend that you're not going to hear anybody else talk about, but when do tokens outpace the salary of the employee?” “Because you're about to hit it. I'm about to hit it.”

What Happens When AI Tokens Cost More Than Your Employees? @jason: “We, with our agents, hit $300/day per agent using the Claude API, like instantly. And that was doing, maybe, 10 or 20%. That's $100k/year per agent.” Chamath Palihapitiya: “We're getting to a place where we have to basically now say, ‘What is the token budget that we're willing to give our best devs?’” “And then if you aggregate it across all people, you can clearly see a trend where you're like, ‘Well, hold on a second, now they need to be at least 2x as productive as another employee.’” “That is actively happening inside my business, because otherwise I'll run out of money.” Jason: “Yeah. This is a very interesting trend that you're not going to hear anybody else talk about, but when do tokens outpace the salary of the employee?” “Because you're about to hit it. I'm about to hit it.”

The All-In Podcast

2,715,662 次观看 • 6 个月前

My young fellas with the bag, Do you REALLY need that Hellcat? Is that chain really worth 20K to ya? 35 year old you is going to want some money. Take it from an OG 💯 #CoachReedLive🎙️

My young fellas with the bag, Do you REALLY need that Hellcat? Is that chain really worth 20K to ya? 35 year old you is going to want some money. Take it from an OG 💯 #CoachReedLive🎙️

Carl Reed Jr.

22,746 次观看 • 1 年前

When Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 was asked if he is Islamophopic? Listen to the answer because it really is that simple once you have educated yourself about it. Politicians all know, which is why it is even more evil what they are doing to the western world. 💯

When Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 was asked if he is Islamophopic? Listen to the answer because it really is that simple once you have educated yourself about it. Politicians all know, which is why it is even more evil what they are doing to the western world. 💯

Patriotic 🇬🇧 Nation

524,154 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 JUDGE ROACH DOES PR INTERVIEW Q: Did it make it different when you realized a lot of witnesses were young witnesses ? “I needed to make sure that they do not change their testimony…” 🤔 All of the student witnesses changed their testimony from initial reports. what are you saying sir ? This is clearly a PR interview. Since when does a sitting judge do or speak about a case ???? This is weird ! A:

🚨 JUDGE ROACH DOES PR INTERVIEW Q: Did it make it different when you realized a lot of witnesses were young witnesses ? “I needed to make sure that they do not change their testimony…” 🤔 All of the student witnesses changed their testimony from initial reports. what are you saying sir ? This is clearly a PR interview. Since when does a sitting judge do or speak about a case ???? This is weird ! A:

rescuewomenfemininity

33,958 次观看 • 2 个月前