Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

IN 1986 MIT FILMED A LECTURE THAT OPENS BY TELLING YOU COMPUTER SCIENCE IS NOT A SCIENCE AND HAS ALMOST NOTHING TO DO WITH COMPUTERS 72 minutes from Hal Abelson and Gerald Sussman, the lecture an entire generation of engineers calls the one that rewired how they think. ->... The line that lands: computer science is about computers the way astronomy is about telescopes. The tool was never the point. The real subject was always one thing -- controlling complexity. Everything else is detail. Forty years later it reads like a prophecy. AI writes the syntax now. What's left is exactly what they taught: taming complexity nobody can hold in their head. The language was never the skill -> the thinking was. This is where you learn it. Most people chase the newest framework. The ones who watched this think on a level frameworks can't touch. Bookmark & Watch today it, this one's a legend ↓show more

slash1s

10,065 subscribers

359,956 просмотров • 29 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

IN 1986 MIT FILMED THE LECTURE WHERE CODE STOPPED BEING CODE AND BECAME DATA 43 minutes from Gerald Sussman, in the most legendary intro programming course ever recorded. -> The idea that lands: to a program, your code is just data it can read and rewrite. He builds a program that does real calculus -- not by crunching numbers, but by reading the math as a list and transforming it piece by piece. Then he shows the trick hiding under all of it: in this language, code and data are the same material. Forty years later that is exactly what an AI coding agent is -- a program that reads your code as data, rewrites it, and hands it back. Sussman drew the whole idea on a blackboard in 1986. Writing code was never the deepest skill -- understanding that code itself is data a program can manipulate is. This is where you learn it. Most people think AI writing code is brand new. The ones who watch this saw the blueprint 40 years ago. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

slash1s

22,107 просмотров • 24 дней назад

IN 1985 ONE OF THE GREATEST PHYSICISTS WHO EVER LIVED SAT DOWN TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPUTERS ACTUALLY WORK AND TOLD A ROOM FULL OF ENGINEERS THE MACHINE IS COMPLETELY DUMB 76 minutes from Richard Feynman, still called the clearest explanation of what a computer really is ever given. -> The idea that lands: a computer is just a very, very fast, very, very dumb file clerk. It doesn't think. It follows tiny simple rules, billions of times a second. All the complexity you're in awe of comes from stacking simple things. There's no magic underneath. There never was. Forty years later everyone calls the model "Intelligent". Feynman already told you what it really is: speed, not thought. Being amazed by the machine was never the point -> understanding what it's actually doing is. Most people are dazzled by what AI says. The ones who watched this know exactly what's happening underneath. Bookmark & Watch it today. This one's a legend ↓

IN 1985 ONE OF THE GREATEST PHYSICISTS WHO EVER LIVED SAT DOWN TO EXPLAIN HOW COMPUTERS ACTUALLY WORK AND TOLD A ROOM FULL OF ENGINEERS THE MACHINE IS COMPLETELY DUMB 76 minutes from Richard Feynman, still called the clearest explanation of what a computer really is ever given. -> The idea that lands: a computer is just a very, very fast, very, very dumb file clerk. It doesn't think. It follows tiny simple rules, billions of times a second. All the complexity you're in awe of comes from stacking simple things. There's no magic underneath. There never was. Forty years later everyone calls the model "Intelligent". Feynman already told you what it really is: speed, not thought. Being amazed by the machine was never the point -> understanding what it's actually doing is. Most people are dazzled by what AI says. The ones who watched this know exactly what's happening underneath. Bookmark & Watch it today. This one's a legend ↓

slash1s

256,728 просмотров • 27 дней назад

IN 1999 MIT FILMED A MATH LECTURE THAT QUIETLY BECAME THE FOUNDATION OF EVERY AI MODEL YOU'VE EVER USED AND ALMOST NO ONE WAS TAUGHT TO SEE IT THAT WAY 39 minutes from Gilbert Strang, who taught this at MIT for over 60 years -- the linear algebra course an entire generation of engineers and data scientists grew up on. -> The shift it creates: you stop seeing matrices as boring grids of numbers and start seeing them as the language of space, data, and motion itself. School drilled you to crunch matrices by hand and never told you why. Strang shows you what they actually mean. Every neural net, every embedding, every model you prompt is linear algebra running underneath. The math you skipped is the engine of the thing you use all day. Memorizing the steps was never the skill -> seeing what the numbers do is. This is where it finally clicks. Most people fear linear algebra and move on. The ones who watched this see straight into how AI actually works. Bookmark & Watch it today, this one's a legend ↓

IN 1999 MIT FILMED A MATH LECTURE THAT QUIETLY BECAME THE FOUNDATION OF EVERY AI MODEL YOU'VE EVER USED AND ALMOST NO ONE WAS TAUGHT TO SEE IT THAT WAY 39 minutes from Gilbert Strang, who taught this at MIT for over 60 years -- the linear algebra course an entire generation of engineers and data scientists grew up on. -> The shift it creates: you stop seeing matrices as boring grids of numbers and start seeing them as the language of space, data, and motion itself. School drilled you to crunch matrices by hand and never told you why. Strang shows you what they actually mean. Every neural net, every embedding, every model you prompt is linear algebra running underneath. The math you skipped is the engine of the thing you use all day. Memorizing the steps was never the skill -> seeing what the numbers do is. This is where it finally clicks. Most people fear linear algebra and move on. The ones who watched this see straight into how AI actually works. Bookmark & Watch it today, this one's a legend ↓

slash1s

431,502 просмотров • 28 дней назад

IN 1982 GRACE HOPPER WALKED INTO THE NSA AND EXPLAINED THE NEXT 40 YEARS OF COMPUTING 48 minutes from the woman who invented the compiler -- the first person who made a machine understand human words. -> The idea that lands: stop bending humans to the machine. Bend the machine to humans. She built the first compiler when the experts swore computers could only crunch numbers. She wanted you to write in plain words and let the machine handle the translation. Forty years later you barely write code at all -- you tell the model what you want in plain English and it writes it for you. The compiler was step one. The LLM is the same idea, finished. Memorizing syntax was never the skill -- saying clearly what you actually want is. This is where that idea was born. Most people think talking to your computer in plain English started in 2023. The ones who watch this know a Navy admiral called it in 1982. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

IN 1982 GRACE HOPPER WALKED INTO THE NSA AND EXPLAINED THE NEXT 40 YEARS OF COMPUTING 48 minutes from the woman who invented the compiler -- the first person who made a machine understand human words. -> The idea that lands: stop bending humans to the machine. Bend the machine to humans. She built the first compiler when the experts swore computers could only crunch numbers. She wanted you to write in plain words and let the machine handle the translation. Forty years later you barely write code at all -- you tell the model what you want in plain English and it writes it for you. The compiler was step one. The LLM is the same idea, finished. Memorizing syntax was never the skill -- saying clearly what you actually want is. This is where that idea was born. Most people think talking to your computer in plain English started in 2023. The ones who watch this know a Navy admiral called it in 1982. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

slash1s

60,755 просмотров • 24 дней назад

IN 2011 ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF AI STOOD AT AN MIT BOARD AND EXPLAINED WHY A MIND IS NOT ONE SMART THING -- IT'S A CROWD OF TINY DUMB PARTS THAT DON'T KNOW ANYTHING A lecture from Marvin Minsky, the man who helped invent artificial intelligence, on his life's idea: the Society of Mind. -> The idea that lands: there is no single "You" inside your head. Just hundreds of simple processes, each almost mindless, working together until thinking appears. No magic. No spark. Intelligence is what happens when enough dumb parts are wired the right way. Forty years later that's exactly what an AI model is: billions of tiny switches, none of them smart, somehow producing something that looks like it thinks. Being amazed by intelligence was never the point -> understanding how it's assembled is. Most people think a mind is a mystery. The ones who watched this see the machinery underneath. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

IN 2011 ONE OF THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF AI STOOD AT AN MIT BOARD AND EXPLAINED WHY A MIND IS NOT ONE SMART THING -- IT'S A CROWD OF TINY DUMB PARTS THAT DON'T KNOW ANYTHING A lecture from Marvin Minsky, the man who helped invent artificial intelligence, on his life's idea: the Society of Mind. -> The idea that lands: there is no single "You" inside your head. Just hundreds of simple processes, each almost mindless, working together until thinking appears. No magic. No spark. Intelligence is what happens when enough dumb parts are wired the right way. Forty years later that's exactly what an AI model is: billions of tiny switches, none of them smart, somehow producing something that looks like it thinks. Being amazed by intelligence was never the point -> understanding how it's assembled is. Most people think a mind is a mystery. The ones who watched this see the machinery underneath. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

slash1s

43,005 просмотров • 26 дней назад

IN 1999 MIT FILMED A MATH LECTURE ON THE ABSTRACT IDEA YOU PROBABLY HATED IN COLLEGE -- THE EXACT MATH GOOGLE LATER USED TO RANK THE ENTIRE INTERNET 50 minutes from Gilbert Strang, who taught this at MIT for over 60 years, on eigenvalues -- the one idea most students memorize and never understand. -> The shift it creates: an eigenvector is just the direction a system doesn't twist, only stretches. Find those, and a tangled mess of equations falls apart into something simple. You were drilled to compute them by hand and never told what they were for. Google's entire empire started here. PageRank is one giant eigenvector problem and the same math now sits inside PCA, recommendations, and how models find structure in data. Computing eigenvalues was never the skill -> understanding what they reveal is. This is where it finally clicks. Most people filed this under "Useless college math". The ones who watched this see it running quietly inside half the tech they touch. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

IN 1999 MIT FILMED A MATH LECTURE ON THE ABSTRACT IDEA YOU PROBABLY HATED IN COLLEGE -- THE EXACT MATH GOOGLE LATER USED TO RANK THE ENTIRE INTERNET 50 minutes from Gilbert Strang, who taught this at MIT for over 60 years, on eigenvalues -- the one idea most students memorize and never understand. -> The shift it creates: an eigenvector is just the direction a system doesn't twist, only stretches. Find those, and a tangled mess of equations falls apart into something simple. You were drilled to compute them by hand and never told what they were for. Google's entire empire started here. PageRank is one giant eigenvector problem and the same math now sits inside PCA, recommendations, and how models find structure in data. Computing eigenvalues was never the skill -> understanding what they reveal is. This is where it finally clicks. Most people filed this under "Useless college math". The ones who watched this see it running quietly inside half the tech they touch. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

slash1s

38,107 просмотров • 27 дней назад

A DEVELOPER PROVED THAT MOST OF THE LANGUAGE RUNNING EVERY WEBSITE YOU USE IS A MINEFIELD AND THAT ALMOST NO ONE WAS EVER TAUGHT WHICH PARTS ARE SAFE An hour from Douglas Crockford, the man who invented JSON, on the good parts of JavaScript buried under a pile of blunders nobody warned you about. -> The moment it lands, every weird bug makes sense. The language never had time to be polished. It went global in months, bad parts and all, and you inherited every one of them. Global variables. Silent semicolon insertion. eval. Coercion that turns a simple comparison into a coin flip. Most people never learned to avoid them -- they just lose hours and blame themselves. Writing JavaScript that runs was never the skill -> knowing which half of it to never touch is. And when an AI agent happily generates the bad parts at scale, the person who knows the safe subset is the one who catches it before it ships. Everyone writes JavaScript. Almost no one was shown the line between the parts that save you and the parts that quietly burn you. Bookmark and Watch it ↓

A DEVELOPER PROVED THAT MOST OF THE LANGUAGE RUNNING EVERY WEBSITE YOU USE IS A MINEFIELD AND THAT ALMOST NO ONE WAS EVER TAUGHT WHICH PARTS ARE SAFE An hour from Douglas Crockford, the man who invented JSON, on the good parts of JavaScript buried under a pile of blunders nobody warned you about. -> The moment it lands, every weird bug makes sense. The language never had time to be polished. It went global in months, bad parts and all, and you inherited every one of them. Global variables. Silent semicolon insertion. eval. Coercion that turns a simple comparison into a coin flip. Most people never learned to avoid them -- they just lose hours and blame themselves. Writing JavaScript that runs was never the skill -> knowing which half of it to never touch is. And when an AI agent happily generates the bad parts at scale, the person who knows the safe subset is the one who catches it before it ships. Everyone writes JavaScript. Almost no one was shown the line between the parts that save you and the parts that quietly burn you. Bookmark and Watch it ↓

slash1s

13,073 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dr. Brian Hooker just delivered a powerful reminder! Real science never demands blind trust — it demands constant questioning. “You do not trust the science.” “We test the science.” “Settled science is a misnomer.” “The science is never settled.” “Nobody can proclaim that they are the science.” “Think of what a pathetic world we would live in if bloodletting was settled science and we stopped right there.” “We have so many of these advances because people dare ask a question.” “A question is a gift.”

Dr. Brian Hooker just delivered a powerful reminder! Real science never demands blind trust — it demands constant questioning. “You do not trust the science.” “We test the science.” “Settled science is a misnomer.” “The science is never settled.” “Nobody can proclaim that they are the science.” “Think of what a pathetic world we would live in if bloodletting was settled science and we stopped right there.” “We have so many of these advances because people dare ask a question.” “A question is a gift.”

Children’s Health Defense

17,075 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

💡 Did you know the “chemical imbalance” explanation for antidepressants was never grounded in real science? And psychiatrists have admitted they keep telling their patients this because it makes them more likely to take medication. “The chemical imbalance story was pushed for decades, largely by the drug industry.” “It was never grounded in real science.” “And all of this is spilt out into the media… after numerous big review articles came out saying that there was no link between low serotonin and depression.” “‘In truth, the chemical imbalance notion was always kind of an urban legend… never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.’” “Many psychiatrists say this to patients because it makes them more likely to accept a medication and it moves the visits faster.” “Telling someone that they have a chemical imbalance can be a really quick way to kind of educate them about why they need to take a medication.” “It just smooths over the process.” “It’s essentially a lie.” “It teaches them to think that their suffering is caused by a broken brain and that the solution is a pill.” “And when you try and pretend that it boils down to a single thing that you can fix with a drug, you’re misleading patients.” Dr. Josef

💡 Did you know the “chemical imbalance” explanation for antidepressants was never grounded in real science? And psychiatrists have admitted they keep telling their patients this because it makes them more likely to take medication. “The chemical imbalance story was pushed for decades, largely by the drug industry.” “It was never grounded in real science.” “And all of this is spilt out into the media… after numerous big review articles came out saying that there was no link between low serotonin and depression.” “‘In truth, the chemical imbalance notion was always kind of an urban legend… never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.’” “Many psychiatrists say this to patients because it makes them more likely to accept a medication and it moves the visits faster.” “Telling someone that they have a chemical imbalance can be a really quick way to kind of educate them about why they need to take a medication.” “It just smooths over the process.” “It’s essentially a lie.” “It teaches them to think that their suffering is caused by a broken brain and that the solution is a pill.” “And when you try and pretend that it boils down to a single thing that you can fix with a drug, you’re misleading patients.” Dr. Josef

Children’s Health Defense

28,278 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The CEO of OpenAI said something that should terrify every coder alive. Sam Altman was asked: "What is the most important skill people should learn in the age of AI?" His answer was not what anyone expected. He said learning to program, the thing every career advisor has drilled into an entire generation is "no longer obviously the right thing." So what does he think actually matters now? Four things and all of them are soft skills. And none of them taught in any computer science program on Earth. Become a high agency, act without being told. Make things happen on your own. Get good at generating ideas because when AI can execute anything, the person who knows what to build wins. Be very resilient, things will break constantly in a world moving at this speed. Be very adaptable, the world is rewriting itself every few months. Keep up or get left behind. But here is the part that changes everything. Altman says these skills are not just personality traits you are born with. They are learnable and deeply learnable. He watched people completely transform in three month bootcamps when he was a startup investor. That was, in his own words, "a big update" to how he sees the world. Now think about what this really means. The CEO of a company worth hundreds of billions is telling the world, the moat is no longer what you know. It is how you think and how you move and the old playbook is dead. The people who understand this right now have a massive head start. Everyone else is studying for a test that no longer exists.

The CEO of OpenAI said something that should terrify every coder alive. Sam Altman was asked: "What is the most important skill people should learn in the age of AI?" His answer was not what anyone expected. He said learning to program, the thing every career advisor has drilled into an entire generation is "no longer obviously the right thing." So what does he think actually matters now? Four things and all of them are soft skills. And none of them taught in any computer science program on Earth. Become a high agency, act without being told. Make things happen on your own. Get good at generating ideas because when AI can execute anything, the person who knows what to build wins. Be very resilient, things will break constantly in a world moving at this speed. Be very adaptable, the world is rewriting itself every few months. Keep up or get left behind. But here is the part that changes everything. Altman says these skills are not just personality traits you are born with. They are learnable and deeply learnable. He watched people completely transform in three month bootcamps when he was a startup investor. That was, in his own words, "a big update" to how he sees the world. Now think about what this really means. The CEO of a company worth hundreds of billions is telling the world, the moat is no longer what you know. It is how you think and how you move and the old playbook is dead. The people who understand this right now have a massive head start. Everyone else is studying for a test that no longer exists.

StockMarket.News

168,154 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

You wanna know why I hate Christianity, because of this right here: "Paganism was largely eradicated in Muslim and Christian countries, and now Judaism was preserved, protected, and is now more powerful than ever" "They like that Jesus conquered all the pagan gods. And now all them worship the God of Israel and believe their Torah. Why will the Christians not show you this stuff? Because they're frauds" "Who taught the Gentiles that they were worshipping demons? Oh, it was the Jews. It was the Saul. The Pharisee told him that" "There is a tractate in the Talmud that talks about the the the correct way to destroy an idol of a Gentile is to knock off their nose like they knocked off the nose and carved the crosses in the forehead. "This is literally the Talmudic Jewish agenda of conquering all of the religions of the world. This is what the Christians did" "Christianity is completely kosher now, and people still want to be in denial that this is an op, that this is a psyop" "Christians destroyed Western civilization, the libraries, the temples, the mythologies, the philosophies, the science, they destroyed it all in the name of the God of the Jews. That's the reality of what happened"

You wanna know why I hate Christianity, because of this right here: "Paganism was largely eradicated in Muslim and Christian countries, and now Judaism was preserved, protected, and is now more powerful than ever" "They like that Jesus conquered all the pagan gods. And now all them worship the God of Israel and believe their Torah. Why will the Christians not show you this stuff? Because they're frauds" "Who taught the Gentiles that they were worshipping demons? Oh, it was the Jews. It was the Saul. The Pharisee told him that" "There is a tractate in the Talmud that talks about the the the correct way to destroy an idol of a Gentile is to knock off their nose like they knocked off the nose and carved the crosses in the forehead. "This is literally the Talmudic Jewish agenda of conquering all of the religions of the world. This is what the Christians did" "Christianity is completely kosher now, and people still want to be in denial that this is an op, that this is a psyop" "Christians destroyed Western civilization, the libraries, the temples, the mythologies, the philosophies, the science, they destroyed it all in the name of the God of the Jews. That's the reality of what happened"

Seethroughitall

10,583 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 PALANTIR FOUNDER PETER THIEL IS TALKING ABOUT “RESURRECTING THE DEAD” — AND THE WAY HE DESCRIBES THE ANTICHRIST IS SETTING OFF ALARMS This wasn’t random. Thiel brought up a real movement that believed science could “physically resurrect all the dead people” and said there was a time it felt possible. Then he connects it to Christianity: “If the promise of Christianity is a physical resurrection… then science could offer that too.” Then it turns dark. Thiel says: “The slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.” “The Antichrist probably presents as a great humanitarian… a great philanthropist… an effective altruist.” Not evil. Not obvious. Trusted. “Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist… more than Armageddon.” Think about that. A man talking about: • Bringing the dead back through science • Recreating religious prophecy • A global figure who gains power by “helping” humanity All in the same breath. And he’s not describing it like a theory. He’s describing it like something that could actually happen. So when someone like this starts laying it out, is he warning you… or telling you what’s coming? If you had to name one person today that fits this… who is it?

🚨 PALANTIR FOUNDER PETER THIEL IS TALKING ABOUT “RESURRECTING THE DEAD” — AND THE WAY HE DESCRIBES THE ANTICHRIST IS SETTING OFF ALARMS This wasn’t random. Thiel brought up a real movement that believed science could “physically resurrect all the dead people” and said there was a time it felt possible. Then he connects it to Christianity: “If the promise of Christianity is a physical resurrection… then science could offer that too.” Then it turns dark. Thiel says: “The slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.” “The Antichrist probably presents as a great humanitarian… a great philanthropist… an effective altruist.” Not evil. Not obvious. Trusted. “Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist… more than Armageddon.” Think about that. A man talking about: • Bringing the dead back through science • Recreating religious prophecy • A global figure who gains power by “helping” humanity All in the same breath. And he’s not describing it like a theory. He’s describing it like something that could actually happen. So when someone like this starts laying it out, is he warning you… or telling you what’s coming? If you had to name one person today that fits this… who is it?

HustleBitch

120,979 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Five studies. Every single one reaches the same conclusion: the vaccinated are sicker. Not one retrospective study anywhere in the world, by any government, any health agency, any institution, has ever shown us that vaccinated children are healthier. Not one. The entire premise of this program has never been validated by the simple comparison it was built on. This is science in America today. This is the system that is telling you vaccines are safe and effective. A system where a scientist will look you in the eye, confirm the data is good, and then walk away. Watch the full film. Share it with everyone you know. The Real Mike Rowe

Five studies. Every single one reaches the same conclusion: the vaccinated are sicker. Not one retrospective study anywhere in the world, by any government, any health agency, any institution, has ever shown us that vaccinated children are healthier. Not one. The entire premise of this program has never been validated by the simple comparison it was built on. This is science in America today. This is the system that is telling you vaccines are safe and effective. A system where a scientist will look you in the eye, confirm the data is good, and then walk away. Watch the full film. Share it with everyone you know. The Real Mike Rowe

Del Bigtree

56,188 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A PHYSICS PROFESSOR GAVE THE SAME LECTURE 1,742 TIMES TO WARN ABOUT ONE IDEA QUIETLY BREAKING THE HUMAN RACE. IT IS THE WORD EVERY AI LAB THROWS AROUND TODAY AND ALMOST NONE OF THEM ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND IT. 72 minutes from Albert Bartlett, a University of Colorado physicist, on the one piece of math he called humanity's greatest blind spot. -> The idea that lands: a small steady percentage is never small. 7% a year sounds calm, but it doubles in a decade, doubles again in the next, and quietly runs away from you. He shows it with bacteria in a bottle, with money, with whole cities -- the same curve that looks flat for ages and then explodes almost overnight. Everyone calls that curve "Exponential". He proves most people hear it as "Fast" when it actually means something far more violent. Right now every lab and every headline calls AI exponential. This is the talk that shows you what the word truly does -- so you see both the hype and the real danger the way the math demands. You thought it was a boring math word. It was the whole story the entire time. Save this one. You'll never hear "Exponential" the same way ↓

A PHYSICS PROFESSOR GAVE THE SAME LECTURE 1,742 TIMES TO WARN ABOUT ONE IDEA QUIETLY BREAKING THE HUMAN RACE. IT IS THE WORD EVERY AI LAB THROWS AROUND TODAY AND ALMOST NONE OF THEM ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND IT. 72 minutes from Albert Bartlett, a University of Colorado physicist, on the one piece of math he called humanity's greatest blind spot. -> The idea that lands: a small steady percentage is never small. 7% a year sounds calm, but it doubles in a decade, doubles again in the next, and quietly runs away from you. He shows it with bacteria in a bottle, with money, with whole cities -- the same curve that looks flat for ages and then explodes almost overnight. Everyone calls that curve "Exponential". He proves most people hear it as "Fast" when it actually means something far more violent. Right now every lab and every headline calls AI exponential. This is the talk that shows you what the word truly does -- so you see both the hype and the real danger the way the math demands. You thought it was a boring math word. It was the whole story the entire time. Save this one. You'll never hear "Exponential" the same way ↓

slash1s

99,512 просмотров • 20 дней назад

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

They taught you electricity was just wires and connections. Nothing more. But there was a hidden power... One they never told you about. Tesla understood it. He exposed it. And that's why they silenced him. Electricity was never just energy. It was control. It was consciousness. Something never meant for the masses. What the awakened know isn't in textbooks. It's not tauaht in schools And you'll never see it on the news. The truth is there. But first, you have to learn how to see it. Nothing is what it seems. Do you dare to question what you have been taught? In "The Truth of the World,"

Kyle L

147,647 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Vice President JD Vance says the attacks on RFK Jr. for “not trusting the science” and being a “conspiracy theorist” are total nonsense. “You know, one of the criticisms that Bobby will always get — and I always think it’s such BS, excuse my language — is when people say, well, this or that conclusion is not supported by the science. Or this or that conclusion is a conspiracy theory.” “Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it, but you can’t shut down the debate.” “As we found out the hard way over the last few years, it was very often the people who were outside the Overton window who were actually right — and all the experts were wrong.”

Vice President JD Vance says the attacks on RFK Jr. for “not trusting the science” and being a “conspiracy theorist” are total nonsense. “You know, one of the criticisms that Bobby will always get — and I always think it’s such BS, excuse my language — is when people say, well, this or that conclusion is not supported by the science. Or this or that conclusion is a conspiracy theory.” “Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it, but you can’t shut down the debate.” “As we found out the hard way over the last few years, it was very often the people who were outside the Overton window who were actually right — and all the experts were wrong.”

MAHA Action

78,397 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Jump Trading pays quants $650K to pull one real signal out of market noise. I wrote the textbook on that exact math and taught it for free." this free MIT lecture is the math the whole "quant edge" is built on, and almost nobody selling you a course will name it. the man teaching it wrote the signal-processing textbook every engineer on earth learned from, and he put the lectures online for nothing. here is the idea. a price chart is a signal buried in noise. most of what you see is random static, and hidden inside is a faint, repeating pattern with real mathematics for pulling it out. that is not a metaphor. jim simons was a codebreaker who did exactly this to enemy transmissions, then pointed the same math at the market and made a hundred billion dollars. none of it is new. oppenheim taught this in 1987, the math is older, and every lecture is free. same story i told in the article above. the edge was never a secret formula. it was knowing a market is a noisy signal, and having the tools to read it. here is what the gurus skip. the math to separate signal from noise is free and everyone has it. the edge is cleaner data than the next desk, and the discipline to trust a faint signal across thousands of trades instead of chasing the static. the filter is free. the patience to use it is not.

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Jump Trading pays quants $650K to pull one real signal out of market noise. I wrote the textbook on that exact math and taught it for free." this free MIT lecture is the math the whole "quant edge" is built on, and almost nobody selling you a course will name it. the man teaching it wrote the signal-processing textbook every engineer on earth learned from, and he put the lectures online for nothing. here is the idea. a price chart is a signal buried in noise. most of what you see is random static, and hidden inside is a faint, repeating pattern with real mathematics for pulling it out. that is not a metaphor. jim simons was a codebreaker who did exactly this to enemy transmissions, then pointed the same math at the market and made a hundred billion dollars. none of it is new. oppenheim taught this in 1987, the math is older, and every lecture is free. same story i told in the article above. the edge was never a secret formula. it was knowing a market is a noisy signal, and having the tools to read it. here is what the gurus skip. the math to separate signal from noise is free and everyone has it. the edge is cleaner data than the next desk, and the discipline to trust a faint signal across thousands of trades instead of chasing the static. the filter is free. the patience to use it is not.

Rossst.03

269,381 просмотров • 13 дней назад