In 2004, CNBC interviewed two young founders in the same segment. One was a 19-year-old from Harvard who said his site had "maybe 100,000 people" and he hoped to "make something cool." That kid was Mark Zuckerberg. Nobody remembers the other founder. Not his name. Not his startup. Nothing.... Same show. Same age. Same shot. Why?show more

You forgot to mention one of them was already a CIA asset.

But Zuck was given Lifelok from D.A.R.P.A. A HUGE head start.

Wdym? Michael Schur went on to have a great career as a writer and bit character for the office

Zuckerberg is a plant. Nothing he did was real. He is just a front Man. Don't be stupid

Is the other guy Dwight’s brother Mose?

Being backed by the CIA/DARPA sure helps.

So weird. Usually when people appear on Tv at the same time they go on to live the exact same life for the next 20+ years.

TheFacebook was basically a reverse engineered Friendster. The difference is that Facebook was relentlessly hyped my the media and Friendster wasn’t. Make of that what you will. The name was a play on Napster, the file sharing (pirating) site.

Not a single reply saying who the first guy is. Who is he?

Zuckerberg fucked him out of his share

Well, since every possible tech startup is worth exactly the same no matter what, it must have been deep state interference.

And his entire board pressured him to sell to Yahoo too. For a whopping $1 billion. He was the single person who said no. And look what he's built. You have to be delusional not to respect that.

"People just submitted it. I don't know why. They 'trust me.' Dumb fucks." ~ Mark Zuckerberg at around the same time of this interview. He wanted a Hot or Not website with information to stalk the girls. That's it. And it made him a billionaire.

Goes along with my argument that a large part of being super successful is just plain luck.

Mose went on to have a solid role on The Office. Stope hating.

one was backed by the US IC.

One had the idea. The other had the “friends.” (You already know which one got the DARPA/CIA head start.)

Zuckerburg is a typical Jew fraud that had connections to the CIA LifeLog was Facebook

Why? Because Zuckerberg was in the proper tribe and fed all his tech by the CIA and deep state people? Someone had to be the "face" of the dystopian tech to come to keep people from knowing who REALLY makes the tech in this world.. and it's not Zuck.

@grok - who is the other founder and where is he now?

@grok who is the other guy?

Oh I know! It’s because one inherited DARPA Project Lifelog, and is masquerading as a young founder and the other didn’t.

Zuck was always a CIA plant. He created nothing. He inherited what they gave him, as a figurehead.

Legend Dan Stillman

Wesmatch and The Facebook

In the early 2000's God was opening my eyes to the fake Jews. I learned their ways. Facebook was garbage, way behind Myspace. It was mind boggling to watch them lie, plant false stories, eventually buy and dismantle Myspace, and install Facebook as the social media platform.

This ain’t the entire show, it’s a clip where only one of the two was asked a question. I’m not sure what I’m missing, but it’s probably something stupid.

I have a feeling we would have been better off with the other guy succeeding

Little prick stole an idea for his own. If those twins don't come into his life, he's an accountant for Arby's

based on the stunning collection of abject morons you've managed to gather in your replies (muh deep state), i'm muting this account

Wasn’t he initially hired by the twins and the Indian guy to build a social networking website for Harvard campus? He actually stole the idea from them

When people say YouTube you instantly think of Hurley &Chen and not it's designer/inventor in 2004 who should have gotten controlling interest but didn't because he was a threat to the Google Monopoly @TheJusticeDept no one ever thinks what a 22y++ investigation does to a life by @fbi

@grok who's the other young founder?

The way he describes “thefacebook” at the time, how did people then not say “that sounds so stupid”