Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

In 2008, shortly after being stair stepped into a clandestine program as a deniable NOC operating domestically, I was further read in on apsects of what I was involved with and due to conflicting compartmentalization and other factors involving double agents and questionable tasking... I discovered that I had...

GreyAreaMonarch's profile picture

Grey

30,765 subscribers

58,255 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikBilim & TeknolojiHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

Realize the implications. When this all went down, I was on call 24/7 living at a blacksite/airstrip on the border of Spring Hill and Columbia, TN, which was set up amidst Iran Contra smuggling by TF160 under the direction of the Oliver North Crew/NSC

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

Regarding pertinent information on alien/NHI/experiencer/contact themed brainwashing, see this megathread with quotes from defectors/survivors/researchers/etc. 39 total sources:

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

The 1995 ACHRE hearing disclosed related information from people across the nation, who blindly corroborated doctors, locations, and program names. The same NS technology tradecraft umbrella covers behavior modification apparatus and advanced propulsion

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

See quoted post for real news: "It all is under the same technology tradecraft umbrella and ICD-10 codes are already setup to treat the hazardous side effects of this planned rollout, with plausible deniability and/or exemption from liability of course"

Miss Magillicutty profil fotoğrafı
Miss Magillicutty1 yıl önce

The entities would also attack me in my sleep and meditation. At one point they were tapping parts of my brain. I know now they were trying to activate/close off memories and alters. They are NOT here to help us!! They are demonic and LIARS!!!

Andrew profil fotoğrafı
Andrew1 yıl önce

I'm assuming here that children are selected for these programs? Via bloodlines, GATE, or some other selection process? The idea being to brainwash them into manchurians that believe "the alien told me to do it." Is this like a shadow army for the "cabal" ?

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

There are many themes but yes you are generally right... not all are combat roles though... and the largest and very important part of the alien theme is that it links with a worldwide behavioral modification broadcast frequency/wave grid that people are actually being encouraged to engage under the guise of UAP / NHI / the phenomenon... the space is saturated by controlling entities and people are being manipulated from it... they get looped into a remote neural feedback loop. Most aren't programmed sleepers/killers but they are getting covertly manipulated to varying extents. Sorry had to get that off my chest haha

Captain Silverstache profil fotoğrafı
Captain Silverstache1 yıl önce

I've listened to 300+ hrs of individuals who have either had NDEs, studied hundreds of NDEs themselves, who have had encounters with "aliens" & others who were abductees & others who interviewed 100s of abductees. You aren't insinuating that all these come from brainwashing?

Grey profil fotoğrafı
Grey1 yıl önce

No I'm not insinuating that NDEs, NHI, and other experiences are all fake. Not at all. I'm saying that they have all regularly been synthesized and derivatives of that are standard in operational brainwashing/psyop programs. If this isn't addressed we are all absolutely done

poly profil fotoğrafı
poly1 yıl önce

where could i find full length videos of you speaking about your experiences?

Benzer Videolar

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.
1:59

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.

Leah Remini

144,420 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Vitaly issues an apology after a p—phile sting gone wrong, where they repeatedly accused the wrong man of being a p—phile. “My team and I mistakenly portrayed Akash Singhania as a child pred*tor. This was a mistake that I deeply regret. He never intended to meet a minor and has been cleared of all wrongdoing. I apologize to Mr. Singhania, his family, his friends, and anyone else affected by this mistake. To be clear, the work we do to expose predatory behavior is of the utmost importance, but in doing so, we cannot lose sight of the truth. I have removed the video from all my accounts, and I ask that anyone who has saved it please do the same. Though I never encourage anyone to attempt to contact any person in my videos, I ask that anyone who is attempting to contact Mr. Singhaniacease at once. This was a learning experience for my team and me, and we will ensure that we remain committed to the truth, as we always have.” (via: Vitaly on Kick)
6:21

Vitaly issues an apology after a p—phile sting gone wrong, where they repeatedly accused the wrong man of being a p—phile. “My team and I mistakenly portrayed Akash Singhania as a child pred*tor. This was a mistake that I deeply regret. He never intended to meet a minor and has been cleared of all wrongdoing. I apologize to Mr. Singhania, his family, his friends, and anyone else affected by this mistake. To be clear, the work we do to expose predatory behavior is of the utmost importance, but in doing so, we cannot lose sight of the truth. I have removed the video from all my accounts, and I ask that anyone who has saved it please do the same. Though I never encourage anyone to attempt to contact any person in my videos, I ask that anyone who is attempting to contact Mr. Singhaniacease at once. This was a learning experience for my team and me, and we will ensure that we remain committed to the truth, as we always have.” (via: Vitaly on Kick)

FearBuck

7,114,000 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

As someone with a Muslim background, I became curious to learn about the history of Jewish people to understand for what crime in the world they deserved to be burnt alive during WWII only to learn that it was for the crime of existence. In addition to being expelled, forced to live in ghetto and being second class citizens, I learned that WWII was one of the MANY instances in which the Jewish population was the target of large-scale hate that led to their mass killings. If Israel did not exist, if it was not for the power of Israel in the region, Jewish people would've been prosecuted and slaughtered to this day. While many wars and tragedies have been happening in the world, It's disgusting and ignorant to compare and equivalent anything with the genocide of Jewish people during WII. It's shameful to hear the same rhetoric that led to many many massacres against Jewish people today in 2023. I refuse to stay silent in the face of anti-Semitism.
40:59

As someone with a Muslim background, I became curious to learn about the history of Jewish people to understand for what crime in the world they deserved to be burnt alive during WWII only to learn that it was for the crime of existence. In addition to being expelled, forced to live in ghetto and being second class citizens, I learned that WWII was one of the MANY instances in which the Jewish population was the target of large-scale hate that led to their mass killings. If Israel did not exist, if it was not for the power of Israel in the region, Jewish people would've been prosecuted and slaughtered to this day. While many wars and tragedies have been happening in the world, It's disgusting and ignorant to compare and equivalent anything with the genocide of Jewish people during WII. It's shameful to hear the same rhetoric that led to many many massacres against Jewish people today in 2023. I refuse to stay silent in the face of anti-Semitism.

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

1,362,578 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The CIA is searching for alien hybrids using Ancestry and 23 and Me according to Jason Jorjani “I was told by somebody in the program with direct experience of this program. They have back doors to Ancestry and 23 and Me and similar genetic analysts companies. Kit Green and a certain division of the CIA use the back doors they have to these programs to scan the databases of genetic material for a specific deviation from normal that they know to be the genetic marker of the Nordics. They know that a significant number of Nordics have escaped the civilization they’re living in and migrated to the United States. These Nordics are settling in certain parts of the country, particularly Colorado Rockies. In some cases they are indistinguishable from tall good looking Nordic people so they marry Americans and they have hybrid children with them, and a lot of these children and grandchildren have no idea what their real ancestry is. So they go and get these tests done without consulting their grandparents. What Kit Green and these people are interested in is they are worried about the infiltration of our society by these hybrids. What they might do once they identify them, I don’t know.“
3:31

The CIA is searching for alien hybrids using Ancestry and 23 and Me according to Jason Jorjani “I was told by somebody in the program with direct experience of this program. They have back doors to Ancestry and 23 and Me and similar genetic analysts companies. Kit Green and a certain division of the CIA use the back doors they have to these programs to scan the databases of genetic material for a specific deviation from normal that they know to be the genetic marker of the Nordics. They know that a significant number of Nordics have escaped the civilization they’re living in and migrated to the United States. These Nordics are settling in certain parts of the country, particularly Colorado Rockies. In some cases they are indistinguishable from tall good looking Nordic people so they marry Americans and they have hybrid children with them, and a lot of these children and grandchildren have no idea what their real ancestry is. So they go and get these tests done without consulting their grandparents. What Kit Green and these people are interested in is they are worried about the infiltration of our society by these hybrids. What they might do once they identify them, I don’t know.“

Red Panda Koala

1,292,329 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and, I suspect, many people in this current administration, who are dual citizens... they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the U.S., but to this network... who, I believe, run Israel." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Christian Elliot posted to the Deconstructing Convention YouTube channel on January 24, 2026. *Note that I did not make the subtitles in the video. They are from the source video. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "To me, the most important issue, because we do have a constitution. It still exists, it's very powerful, and we still have a sovereign government. Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and I suspect many people in this current administration who are dual citizens. They are not just Americans. They have passports. Many, I suspect, to Israel. "I did an interview with Cynthia McKinney, used to be a congresswoman from the Atlanta area. And she said the number one problem in Congress is the dual citizen passport group. And they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the United States, but to this network. And many of those people, again, are in the United States who run, I believe, who run Israel. And this is a real problem. "And one of the reasons it's a real problem is if you look at that network, they are deeply involved in pushing for financial transaction control. And if you're going to give them a get out of jail free card on what they're doing in Israel, and it's not just in Palestine. Netanyahu was very clear. He said, we're going to turn Israel into a lab for Pfizer. And he mandated the shot. "So if you look at what is happening, the genocide is not just in Palestine, it's in Israel, too. [And] Congress gave [Netanyahu] 54 standing ovations."
1:48

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and, I suspect, many people in this current administration, who are dual citizens... they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the U.S., but to this network... who, I believe, run Israel." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Christian Elliot posted to the Deconstructing Convention YouTube channel on January 24, 2026. *Note that I did not make the subtitles in the video. They are from the source video. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "To me, the most important issue, because we do have a constitution. It still exists, it's very powerful, and we still have a sovereign government. Unfortunately, we have many people in Congress and I suspect many people in this current administration who are dual citizens. They are not just Americans. They have passports. Many, I suspect, to Israel. "I did an interview with Cynthia McKinney, used to be a congresswoman from the Atlanta area. And she said the number one problem in Congress is the dual citizen passport group. And they are loyal not to the sovereign interests of the United States, but to this network. And many of those people, again, are in the United States who run, I believe, who run Israel. And this is a real problem. "And one of the reasons it's a real problem is if you look at that network, they are deeply involved in pushing for financial transaction control. And if you're going to give them a get out of jail free card on what they're doing in Israel, and it's not just in Palestine. Netanyahu was very clear. He said, we're going to turn Israel into a lab for Pfizer. And he mandated the shot. "So if you look at what is happening, the genocide is not just in Palestine, it's in Israel, too. [And] Congress gave [Netanyahu] 54 standing ovations."

Sense Receptor

15,140 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

.David Sacks is questioned about the congressional testimony of the Presidents of Harvard, Penn, and MIT and whether students should be able to march around campus chanting phrases like "from the river to the sea" and "intifada"? "I have a very high bar for free speech. So I would allow almost everything. The problem that these university presidents have is that's not their position. They're trying to wrap themselves in the cloak of freedom of speech and academic freedom, but that has not been their practice on campus for many years. On a previous program, we talked about the FIRE survey, which polled students about how free they feel to express opinions on campus. The results were dismal for the Ivy League... And in fact, remember that Harvard got the Blutarsky, a zero point zero. The students there reported that speakers were shouted down, they weren't even invited, and they weren't allowed to continue and finish their speeches. So, Harvard has an abysmal record on freedom of speech. So it's hard to believe the President of Harvard when she claims that she's standing up for freedom of speech. And if you were to apply that same standard to other groups... Imagine if representatives at that hearing had said to the President of Harvard, are you allowed to advocate for genocide of black people or trans people? I mean, would the answer have been the same? I think absolutely not. So the question is, why are Jews being treated differently than these other groups? And I think this all goes back to woke identity politics, where in the woke ideology, certain groups are victim groups, and certain groups are oppressor groups. And if you're in a victim group, you get special protections. And if you're in an oppressor group, then it's just assumed that you can't really suffer discrimination or injustice in that same way. And I think that Jews have basically been put in an oppressor group. They basically are being placed in the same group as all white people. And I think this has come as a great surprise to a lot of donors to these university campuses, who I think we're okay with woke identity politics to some degree when they believed that Jewish people were a potential victim group and that antisemitism was being treated as real. And lo and behold, they found out that no, they're an oppressor group, and they're not protected. And even very explicit cases of antisemitism are not being recognized by these universities. Because, again, it doesn't match up with this woke ideology. It would have been a lot better for a lot of these donors to realize that woke identity politics was a cul de sac. It was something that they should have wanted to avoid participating in. But I think they're now waking up to the realization that in this, again, oppressor-oppressed dichotomy, they're on the wrong side of that." Via The All-In Podcast:
4:22

.David Sacks is questioned about the congressional testimony of the Presidents of Harvard, Penn, and MIT and whether students should be able to march around campus chanting phrases like "from the river to the sea" and "intifada"? "I have a very high bar for free speech. So I would allow almost everything. The problem that these university presidents have is that's not their position. They're trying to wrap themselves in the cloak of freedom of speech and academic freedom, but that has not been their practice on campus for many years. On a previous program, we talked about the FIRE survey, which polled students about how free they feel to express opinions on campus. The results were dismal for the Ivy League... And in fact, remember that Harvard got the Blutarsky, a zero point zero. The students there reported that speakers were shouted down, they weren't even invited, and they weren't allowed to continue and finish their speeches. So, Harvard has an abysmal record on freedom of speech. So it's hard to believe the President of Harvard when she claims that she's standing up for freedom of speech. And if you were to apply that same standard to other groups... Imagine if representatives at that hearing had said to the President of Harvard, are you allowed to advocate for genocide of black people or trans people? I mean, would the answer have been the same? I think absolutely not. So the question is, why are Jews being treated differently than these other groups? And I think this all goes back to woke identity politics, where in the woke ideology, certain groups are victim groups, and certain groups are oppressor groups. And if you're in a victim group, you get special protections. And if you're in an oppressor group, then it's just assumed that you can't really suffer discrimination or injustice in that same way. And I think that Jews have basically been put in an oppressor group. They basically are being placed in the same group as all white people. And I think this has come as a great surprise to a lot of donors to these university campuses, who I think we're okay with woke identity politics to some degree when they believed that Jewish people were a potential victim group and that antisemitism was being treated as real. And lo and behold, they found out that no, they're an oppressor group, and they're not protected. And even very explicit cases of antisemitism are not being recognized by these universities. Because, again, it doesn't match up with this woke ideology. It would have been a lot better for a lot of these donors to realize that woke identity politics was a cul de sac. It was something that they should have wanted to avoid participating in. But I think they're now waking up to the realization that in this, again, oppressor-oppressed dichotomy, they're on the wrong side of that." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

2,119,461 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Me: One cannot charitably credit them with trying to restore academic freedom in universities. The extreme assault by the Trump administration on parts of Harvard had nothing to do with the suppression of speech, such as in the science and engineering departments. The agenda is really to cripple civil society organizations that might be centers of opposition, in the same way they had gone after the media, after law firms, and after other branches of government. Kmele Foster (Kmele 🖐) of The Fifth Column 🖐: If I was going to try to sort of steelman the position of people on the right, they would say: you already lost a lot of those institutions in the sciences proper. You mentioned Nature earlier and the fact that they weren’t unwilling to publish certain things that were inconvenient to them with respect to their political convictions. Does that not justify the Trump administration kind of taking a much harder line? Me: Well, no. Among the legitimate functions of government stipulated in the Constitution, policing scientific journals is not one of them. But in any case, it wasn’t as if they singled out research projects at Harvard that flouted standards of scientific excellence by prioritizing political correctness over truth. It was an across-the-board zeroing of funding.
1:08

Me: One cannot charitably credit them with trying to restore academic freedom in universities. The extreme assault by the Trump administration on parts of Harvard had nothing to do with the suppression of speech, such as in the science and engineering departments. The agenda is really to cripple civil society organizations that might be centers of opposition, in the same way they had gone after the media, after law firms, and after other branches of government. Kmele Foster (Kmele 🖐) of The Fifth Column 🖐: If I was going to try to sort of steelman the position of people on the right, they would say: you already lost a lot of those institutions in the sciences proper. You mentioned Nature earlier and the fact that they weren’t unwilling to publish certain things that were inconvenient to them with respect to their political convictions. Does that not justify the Trump administration kind of taking a much harder line? Me: Well, no. Among the legitimate functions of government stipulated in the Constitution, policing scientific journals is not one of them. But in any case, it wasn’t as if they singled out research projects at Harvard that flouted standards of scientific excellence by prioritizing political correctness over truth. It was an across-the-board zeroing of funding.

Steven Pinker

57,609 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Blast from the past. Listen as Sky News Journalist gives me a lecture on how effective the jabs and mandates are back in November 2021. I was in two weeks quarantine at the time but was being inundated by people with vaccine injuries. And then listen to him in 2024 saying the mandates were a waste of time. Needless to say Sky no longer invite me on the station, lest I call them out for lies. Newscorp and the rest of the media have a lot to answer for. If the Misinformation and Disinformation laws should have applied to anyone it should have been the media and the government. #auspol
2:19

Blast from the past. Listen as Sky News Journalist gives me a lecture on how effective the jabs and mandates are back in November 2021. I was in two weeks quarantine at the time but was being inundated by people with vaccine injuries. And then listen to him in 2024 saying the mandates were a waste of time. Needless to say Sky no longer invite me on the station, lest I call them out for lies. Newscorp and the rest of the media have a lot to answer for. If the Misinformation and Disinformation laws should have applied to anyone it should have been the media and the government. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

69,777 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NBC News legal analyst Danny Cevallos on what the ICE officer’s cellphone video showed: “It’s evidence that both the driver and the passenger, her wife, was out of the car, were confrontational with police. Now, that doesn’t mean you conclude they were being violence or aggressive or anything, but it fits into the calculus. Consider, for example, instead if they had, yes, sir, right away, sir, well, that goes into the calculus, too. Everything is a factor in the escalation of force formula. And if people are being — citizens are compliant to orders, that’s a different analysis than whether they are, in this case, not being openly violent towards the officers, but taunting them, being aggressive. It all factors into the calculus. It certainly doesn’t mean if they are being unfriendly to the officers that the officers can use deadly force, and it may not go that much to whether or not the officer in that moment perceived he was in fear of imminent serious physical harm sufficient to warrant the firearm.” “I’ll just add, also, if this was a car stop, and ICE agents have limited ability to initiate car stops, but if they suspect obstruction of their own duties, which there are several federal statutes that would apply to that, criminal statutes, they may be able to initiate a car stop. And you hear one saying get out of the car. That includes the right, since a sort case from long ago, to order people out of the car, even if not suspected to be dangerous or anything like that. So, you may have a lawful exit orders. Those are things that factor into the many different factors that everyone will be looking at in determining whether this was a justified use of force.”
1:46

NBC News legal analyst Danny Cevallos on what the ICE officer’s cellphone video showed: “It’s evidence that both the driver and the passenger, her wife, was out of the car, were confrontational with police. Now, that doesn’t mean you conclude they were being violence or aggressive or anything, but it fits into the calculus. Consider, for example, instead if they had, yes, sir, right away, sir, well, that goes into the calculus, too. Everything is a factor in the escalation of force formula. And if people are being — citizens are compliant to orders, that’s a different analysis than whether they are, in this case, not being openly violent towards the officers, but taunting them, being aggressive. It all factors into the calculus. It certainly doesn’t mean if they are being unfriendly to the officers that the officers can use deadly force, and it may not go that much to whether or not the officer in that moment perceived he was in fear of imminent serious physical harm sufficient to warrant the firearm.” “I’ll just add, also, if this was a car stop, and ICE agents have limited ability to initiate car stops, but if they suspect obstruction of their own duties, which there are several federal statutes that would apply to that, criminal statutes, they may be able to initiate a car stop. And you hear one saying get out of the car. That includes the right, since a sort case from long ago, to order people out of the car, even if not suspected to be dangerous or anything like that. So, you may have a lawful exit orders. Those are things that factor into the many different factors that everyone will be looking at in determining whether this was a justified use of force.”

Curtis Houck

178,278 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

I’ve been called “wog” before. It nearly destroyed my life. I have no idea how I coped. It stopped me from starting a family, building a business and buying a home. It stopped me from being involved in Australian politics and even impeded my ability to sue a sitting Prime Minister from the executive of a major political party. It was debilitating… ahhhh, no. In truth, Australia is one of the most welcoming and fair-minded places in the world. When my grandparents migrated here from southern Europe some more than 100 years ago, they assimilated. They wanted to be Australian, their kids wanted to be Australian. After all that’s why they came. I was brought up Australian. We spoke English at home, and had friends of all backgrounds. But the one thing we had in common was our shared love for this country and a common Australian culture. I started growing up here before Paul Keating talked about multiculturalism. I don’t understand why people would leave their homelands and not want to be a real and full part of the Australian experience. If people want to keep their culture intact, and raise their children as something other than fully Australian, why come here at all? Some might say that there are cultures that are totally incompatible with our Western system, and I am not prosecuting that case, but if immigration (which has always been a part of the Australian story) is going to work and serve Australia, then surely people must be prepared to accept a new way of life upon arrival. It’s not as if the country has not afforded everyone great opportunities in the past - before the new post Covid era today, where there seems to be a total lack of opportunity for anyone. I always find it disturbing to hear politicians and talking heads in the media call Australia a racist nation - calling Australians racist. Many of these speakers are themselves recent immigrants. They sit in the Australian parliament and are paid by the Australian taxpayer, or they work for the ABC among other senior private and public sector positions. Many have much better lives and opportunities than people who have been here for hundreds of years, and even tens of thousands of years. They are privileged to have a voice, and instead of using that voice to thank the people of this country for the opportunities afforded to them, they slander us all. Call us names and try to shame us. Many of us gave up the cultures of our heritage to be a part of the Australian story and that is the only way we will have anything like social cohesion moving forward. Gratitude goes a long way, especially when one considers the fact that most immigration has been an imposition. There has rarely been a national conversation, or even any airtime given to those who would want to insist on a reduction or ending of the immigration programme. More, it is a sin to suggest that multiculturalism has failed. Forget the loss of trust and rights (like speech) that have been the absolute consequence of a system so obviously under pressure. I don’t care where you come from, what you believe, or who you think you are, if you don’t think you get a fair go here – you could always go back to wherever it is you come from. I’m sure it is the same advice I would be given if I were to go to whatever country that is and whinge about just about anything. The reason people stay is, even with the terrible political situation, it is still the best country in the world to live and raise a family and there are opportunities for anyone who wants to have a go. We must restore trust, and that starts with frank and honest conversations – even if they are unpleasant or inconvenient. I just want Australia back.
1:06

I’ve been called “wog” before. It nearly destroyed my life. I have no idea how I coped. It stopped me from starting a family, building a business and buying a home. It stopped me from being involved in Australian politics and even impeded my ability to sue a sitting Prime Minister from the executive of a major political party. It was debilitating… ahhhh, no. In truth, Australia is one of the most welcoming and fair-minded places in the world. When my grandparents migrated here from southern Europe some more than 100 years ago, they assimilated. They wanted to be Australian, their kids wanted to be Australian. After all that’s why they came. I was brought up Australian. We spoke English at home, and had friends of all backgrounds. But the one thing we had in common was our shared love for this country and a common Australian culture. I started growing up here before Paul Keating talked about multiculturalism. I don’t understand why people would leave their homelands and not want to be a real and full part of the Australian experience. If people want to keep their culture intact, and raise their children as something other than fully Australian, why come here at all? Some might say that there are cultures that are totally incompatible with our Western system, and I am not prosecuting that case, but if immigration (which has always been a part of the Australian story) is going to work and serve Australia, then surely people must be prepared to accept a new way of life upon arrival. It’s not as if the country has not afforded everyone great opportunities in the past - before the new post Covid era today, where there seems to be a total lack of opportunity for anyone. I always find it disturbing to hear politicians and talking heads in the media call Australia a racist nation - calling Australians racist. Many of these speakers are themselves recent immigrants. They sit in the Australian parliament and are paid by the Australian taxpayer, or they work for the ABC among other senior private and public sector positions. Many have much better lives and opportunities than people who have been here for hundreds of years, and even tens of thousands of years. They are privileged to have a voice, and instead of using that voice to thank the people of this country for the opportunities afforded to them, they slander us all. Call us names and try to shame us. Many of us gave up the cultures of our heritage to be a part of the Australian story and that is the only way we will have anything like social cohesion moving forward. Gratitude goes a long way, especially when one considers the fact that most immigration has been an imposition. There has rarely been a national conversation, or even any airtime given to those who would want to insist on a reduction or ending of the immigration programme. More, it is a sin to suggest that multiculturalism has failed. Forget the loss of trust and rights (like speech) that have been the absolute consequence of a system so obviously under pressure. I don’t care where you come from, what you believe, or who you think you are, if you don’t think you get a fair go here – you could always go back to wherever it is you come from. I’m sure it is the same advice I would be given if I were to go to whatever country that is and whinge about just about anything. The reason people stay is, even with the terrible political situation, it is still the best country in the world to live and raise a family and there are opportunities for anyone who wants to have a go. We must restore trust, and that starts with frank and honest conversations – even if they are unpleasant or inconvenient. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

56,476 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Here’s DHH (Creator of Ruby on Rails & Omarchy, cofounder of 37 Signals) on why using AI agents does not feel like being a Project Manager: “When I was on that Lex interview last summer, I was saying: I don't want to be a project manager for agents because I had the mental model of a project manager of humans, and that's not what I enjoy. I don't want to be that far away from the production. I want to be in the mix. I want to have my hands in the code. What I failed to realise at the time was that running a bunch of agents feels less like being a project manager for agents and more like stepping into this super mech suit, where suddenly I don't just have two arms, I have 12. I can now look at seven screens at the same time, running five keyboards. I'm still the one doing it, even if I'm not typing ‘this’ as a keyword in a program. I have been hyper accelerated as a programmer. It's a different kind of programmer, but it still has the same affinity to aesthetics, at least when I'm producing Ruby code, and I'm able to combine that while being vastly more productive on a bunch of things.”
1:19

Here’s DHH (Creator of Ruby on Rails & Omarchy, cofounder of 37 Signals) on why using AI agents does not feel like being a Project Manager: “When I was on that Lex interview last summer, I was saying: I don't want to be a project manager for agents because I had the mental model of a project manager of humans, and that's not what I enjoy. I don't want to be that far away from the production. I want to be in the mix. I want to have my hands in the code. What I failed to realise at the time was that running a bunch of agents feels less like being a project manager for agents and more like stepping into this super mech suit, where suddenly I don't just have two arms, I have 12. I can now look at seven screens at the same time, running five keyboards. I'm still the one doing it, even if I'm not typing ‘this’ as a keyword in a program. I have been hyper accelerated as a programmer. It's a different kind of programmer, but it still has the same affinity to aesthetics, at least when I'm producing Ruby code, and I'm able to combine that while being vastly more productive on a bunch of things.”

The Pragmatic Engineer

29,416 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Lina Khan on AI: "These are individuals that have become used to a certain level of impunity, elite impunity that I think we've talked about in the past as being a broader cultural, social phenomena that results when we're not holding the rich and the powerful to the same rules and the same standards that we do to everybody else. I think there are a lot of magazine profiles and other assessments looking at what these individuals as a personal matter and their character. I think to me, some of that is a little bit less interesting than this basic question of: Who is deciding in the first instance what trajectory these technologies take? And whenever you have a tiny number of elites getting to call the shots around this potentially transformational technology, that is gonna be dangerous even if you have the most benevolent, well-meaning people in the driver's seat. It really comes down to the concentration of power." From our people's town hall with AI Now Institute
1:30

Lina Khan on AI: "These are individuals that have become used to a certain level of impunity, elite impunity that I think we've talked about in the past as being a broader cultural, social phenomena that results when we're not holding the rich and the powerful to the same rules and the same standards that we do to everybody else. I think there are a lot of magazine profiles and other assessments looking at what these individuals as a personal matter and their character. I think to me, some of that is a little bit less interesting than this basic question of: Who is deciding in the first instance what trajectory these technologies take? And whenever you have a tiny number of elites getting to call the shots around this potentially transformational technology, that is gonna be dangerous even if you have the most benevolent, well-meaning people in the driver's seat. It really comes down to the concentration of power." From our people's town hall with AI Now Institute

More Perfect Union

64,567 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce