In an unexpected and candid moment, Hunter Biden sits down with conservative commentator Candace Owens to reflect on the loss of civil discourse in modern politics, longing for the days when people could radically disagree on policy and still share a meal. ​Hunter Biden: “I am certain that we... disagree on a lot of stuff, but there used to be a time, Candace, where you and I could sit down together and disagree about tax policy.” ​Candace Owens: “Mhm.” ​Hunter Biden: “We could disagree about the Catholic Church's view on abortion, or disagree with whatever the subject may be, and still be able to go have a meal together.” ​Candace Owens: “Right. I talk about that often on my show. Back when I was left leaning, I would”show more

@0xMideSol Real talk we need more of this for sure

@0xMideSol Civil dialogue matters across differences.

@0xMideSol I agree, bridging divides is essential for productive conversation.

@0xMideSol What metrics track audience engagement for contrasting political viewpoints?

@0xMideSol I know what he means. It's tough to find common ground. Can we go back to that?

@0xMideSol That clip hits different, disagreeing without dehumanizing feels rare now

@0xMideSol Isn't it wild how the art of disagreement seems to have vanished? What do you think brought about this shift?

@0xMideSol That longing for civil disagreement across the aisle is something a lot of people miss these days.

@0xMideSol Every step forward reinforces the overall vision.

@0xMideSol I agree, civil discourse seems like a distant memory, where differing views were met with respect rather than ridicule and vitriol slowly.

@0xMideSol Hunter Biden: “We could disagree about the Catholic Church's view on abortion

@0xMideSol This made me see the topic from a much broader perspective

@0xMideSol Being able to disagree without treating each other as enemies is something politics could use a lot more of.

@0xMideSol Interesting to hear Hunter Biden reflect on civil discourse today

@0xMideSol About civil discourse fading; would love to see more meals over policy disagreements, not scrolling battles.

@0xMideSol This is the best way

@0xMideSol It is refreshing to see two people with such different perspectives choose to bridge the gap through conversation.

@0xMideSol Real talk still gotta respect differences before meals

@0xMideSol this conversation could spark meaningful dialogue

@0xMideSol no way this is real haha

@0xMideSol that's a really interesting perspective on discourse

@0xMideSol that's actually a pretty wild conversation to see happening

@0xMideSol "civil discourse" is cool, but policy outcomes matter more than sharing a meal.

@0xMideSol people can still share a meal after disagreeing, nice conversation

@0xMideSol longing for the days when people could radically disagree on policy and still share a meal.

@0xMideSol Respectful disagreement is healthier than constant division. Real conversations happen when people listen without seeing each other as enemies.

FT: @RealCandaceO || @HunterBiden

@0xMideSol Maybe he does have a point after all

@0xMideSol politics loses meaning when respect disappears

@0xMideSol what about when you disagree on a cat

@0xMideSol Respectful debate keeps conversations productive.

@0xMideSol healthy disagreement is important for any society being able to discuss different views with respect is a valuable thing

@0xMideSol It's refreshing to see open dialogue between differing viewpoints

@0xMideSol being able to disagree and still respect each other matters