Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

In August 2021, Osterholm sent a group text (explicitly to avoid FOIA issues) about how cloth masks don't work to Fauci, Walensky, and others. Here's the question to Psaki about Osterholm's prior comments that prompted this text. It was related to a DeSantis EO banning mask mandates for school... show more

Kelley K

43,655 subscribers

80,246 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

55,839 views • 13 days ago

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

2,316,533 views • 3 years ago

A case study from 2025 on Fauci's chosen method of prevarication. Scene: A appearance by Anthony Fauci at the New Orleans book festival, where he explains why "masks worked". In this clip, he starts by declaring: "masks worked". Applause follows. We should ask how applause is appropriate. Whether masks work is a scientific problem. It is not a moral or political position. Should a scientist be applauded for giving his or her scientific opinion? If they are, then it's not being treated as a scientific opinion anymore. The applause shows just how ideological the whole discussion on masking became--and remains. But what follows is remarkable. The interviewer pushes back and questions whether masks really worked, whether scientific evidence really supports that position. Fauci yields and pivots: "there's the rub, Walter, a proper mask, an N95 or KN95." In other words, the implication is that the cloth and surgical masks that he recommended during the pandemic didn't work, but N95s do. Which somehow still allows Fauci to say, "masks worked". Isn't this remarkable? Fauci started with "masks worked", i.e. the masks that were widely recommended and worn. And for this he was applauded. But now, without conceding the mistake of surgical and cloth recommendations, he maintains that "masks worked" but only "N95s or KN95s". It gets richer. Then Fauci digs in deeper: N95s and KN95s work, yes. But, but, but! Only if the N95 and KN95 is "properly worn, all the time". That is, the mask has to be properly fitted (and that requires professional assistance) with a proper seal, and worn all the time. Ergo, "masks worked". We've gone from cloth and surgical mask recommendations to properly fitted N95 and KN95 masks worn all the time. This is why "masks worked". Then Fauci digs in even deeper: but you cannot take the mask off to eat! People complain that they took the mask off to eat and got COVID. You can't do normal things and say masks don't work! The only way masks work if you live entirely abnormal lives. Therefore, according to Fauci, "masks worked". Here's the thing: Fauci has just enumerated all of the arguments against masks working in the real world, all the while affirming that "masks worked". He gets his cake and eats it too: On the one hand, clinical studies show that not only do surgical and cloth masks not work for respiratory pathogens in a variety of environments, N95s haven't been shown to work to reduce the risk of infection by a respiratory pathogen when worn over the course of the day in normal working conditions either. (This is probably, as other studies show, because the seal breaks within just a few hours--something Fauci alludes to--and because people take the mask off.) On the other hand, if you mask harder, if you do it absolutely perfectly, then they DO work. Ergo, "masks worked". Does anyone else see how twisted this logic is? I mean, masks don't work under most or all real-world conditions. BUT, they do in theory. Therefore "masks worked", and therefore (by implication) surgical and cloth mask mandates were not pseudoscientific or a mistake. And for that performance Anthony Fauci is applauded and lionized, and he goes on and on. And nobody in the tribe pushes back on the ridiculousness of it. They just turn off their brains. And clap. It boggles the mind.

A case study from 2025 on Fauci's chosen method of prevarication. Scene: A appearance by Anthony Fauci at the New Orleans book festival, where he explains why "masks worked". In this clip, he starts by declaring: "masks worked". Applause follows. We should ask how applause is appropriate. Whether masks work is a scientific problem. It is not a moral or political position. Should a scientist be applauded for giving his or her scientific opinion? If they are, then it's not being treated as a scientific opinion anymore. The applause shows just how ideological the whole discussion on masking became--and remains. But what follows is remarkable. The interviewer pushes back and questions whether masks really worked, whether scientific evidence really supports that position. Fauci yields and pivots: "there's the rub, Walter, a proper mask, an N95 or KN95." In other words, the implication is that the cloth and surgical masks that he recommended during the pandemic didn't work, but N95s do. Which somehow still allows Fauci to say, "masks worked". Isn't this remarkable? Fauci started with "masks worked", i.e. the masks that were widely recommended and worn. And for this he was applauded. But now, without conceding the mistake of surgical and cloth recommendations, he maintains that "masks worked" but only "N95s or KN95s". It gets richer. Then Fauci digs in deeper: N95s and KN95s work, yes. But, but, but! Only if the N95 and KN95 is "properly worn, all the time". That is, the mask has to be properly fitted (and that requires professional assistance) with a proper seal, and worn all the time. Ergo, "masks worked". We've gone from cloth and surgical mask recommendations to properly fitted N95 and KN95 masks worn all the time. This is why "masks worked". Then Fauci digs in even deeper: but you cannot take the mask off to eat! People complain that they took the mask off to eat and got COVID. You can't do normal things and say masks don't work! The only way masks work if you live entirely abnormal lives. Therefore, according to Fauci, "masks worked". Here's the thing: Fauci has just enumerated all of the arguments against masks working in the real world, all the while affirming that "masks worked". He gets his cake and eats it too: On the one hand, clinical studies show that not only do surgical and cloth masks not work for respiratory pathogens in a variety of environments, N95s haven't been shown to work to reduce the risk of infection by a respiratory pathogen when worn over the course of the day in normal working conditions either. (This is probably, as other studies show, because the seal breaks within just a few hours--something Fauci alludes to--and because people take the mask off.) On the other hand, if you mask harder, if you do it absolutely perfectly, then they DO work. Ergo, "masks worked". Does anyone else see how twisted this logic is? I mean, masks don't work under most or all real-world conditions. BUT, they do in theory. Therefore "masks worked", and therefore (by implication) surgical and cloth mask mandates were not pseudoscientific or a mistake. And for that performance Anthony Fauci is applauded and lionized, and he goes on and on. And nobody in the tribe pushes back on the ridiculousness of it. They just turn off their brains. And clap. It boggles the mind.

Kevin Bass

116,791 views • 15 days ago

"My daughter … stood firm in her decision to no longer wear a mask to school. And for that, she was suspended 11 times … Think about how absurd that sounds." — A parent rails against masks at House Republicans' event introducing the "Parents Bill of Rights"

"My daughter … stood firm in her decision to no longer wear a mask to school. And for that, she was suspended 11 times … Think about how absurd that sounds." — A parent rails against masks at House Republicans' event introducing the "Parents Bill of Rights"

The Recount

719,069 views • 3 years ago

🚨 Unmasking the Evidence: What the Science Says About Masks For years, masks were sold as “the most powerful public health tool,” enforced by mandates, fines, and social pressure. But when the dust settled, and the data were finally reviewed, from Sweden’s outcomes to Cochrane’s gold-standard analysis, the evidence for population-wide mask mandates was weak or nonexistent. This Freedom Research original asks the question few were allowed to ask at the time: Were masks driven by science or by fear, symbolism, and compliance? Watch the evidence. Remember what we were told. And never forget how easily “the science” became untouchable dogma.

🚨 Unmasking the Evidence: What the Science Says About Masks For years, masks were sold as “the most powerful public health tool,” enforced by mandates, fines, and social pressure. But when the dust settled, and the data were finally reviewed, from Sweden’s outcomes to Cochrane’s gold-standard analysis, the evidence for population-wide mask mandates was weak or nonexistent. This Freedom Research original asks the question few were allowed to ask at the time: Were masks driven by science or by fear, symbolism, and compliance? Watch the evidence. Remember what we were told. And never forget how easily “the science” became untouchable dogma.

Freedom Research

47,912 views • 8 months ago

Jen Psaki: "The American public is not waiting for someone to lead them out of fascism. That is not what the American public sent us a message about. They're waiting for people to listen to them and actually engage with them in their communities about what they want from the government."

Jen Psaki: "The American public is not waiting for someone to lead them out of fascism. That is not what the American public sent us a message about. They're waiting for people to listen to them and actually engage with them in their communities about what they want from the government."

Ken Klippenstein

1,728,186 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan just went off on Anthony Fauci with lead actor from Shawshank Redemption Tim Robbins for mandating masks and lockdowns during the 2020 pandemic which caused severe developmental damage to children: ROGAN: “Children weren’t even susceptible to the virus. Why are they in lockdown wearing a mask? What are we really doing here?” ROBBINS: “Science became a religion.” ROGAN: “Fauci said that when you are criticizing Anthony Fauci you are criticizing science. That’s such a wild thing to say.” ROBBINS: “If you questioned the religion, you got kicked out of the cult.” ROGAN: “Science is supposed to evolve from hypothesis to hypothesis based on new data. Science isn’t supposed to be a brick that you aren’t allowed to question.” ROBBINS: “I don’t believe in experts anymore. If you consider yourself an expert that means you’re done learning. I can’t trust people who have stopped challenging themselves.” ROGAN: “Real experts from MIT and Harvard were getting deplatformed for saying that the lockdown was bad for children.” ROBBINS: “Those kids had two years of socialization robbed from them.” ROGAN: “Imagine if that was your senior year of high school.” ROBBINS: “Kids stopped making eye contact with each other when the lockdowns ended. They were completely desocialized. All they would do is look at the floor.” ROGAN: “It’s so critical for toddlers to develop by reading people’s faces. Imagine being a toddler and seeing everyone with a mask on. Everyone is robbing a bank now? This is nuts.”

Joe Rogan just went off on Anthony Fauci with lead actor from Shawshank Redemption Tim Robbins for mandating masks and lockdowns during the 2020 pandemic which caused severe developmental damage to children: ROGAN: “Children weren’t even susceptible to the virus. Why are they in lockdown wearing a mask? What are we really doing here?” ROBBINS: “Science became a religion.” ROGAN: “Fauci said that when you are criticizing Anthony Fauci you are criticizing science. That’s such a wild thing to say.” ROBBINS: “If you questioned the religion, you got kicked out of the cult.” ROGAN: “Science is supposed to evolve from hypothesis to hypothesis based on new data. Science isn’t supposed to be a brick that you aren’t allowed to question.” ROBBINS: “I don’t believe in experts anymore. If you consider yourself an expert that means you’re done learning. I can’t trust people who have stopped challenging themselves.” ROGAN: “Real experts from MIT and Harvard were getting deplatformed for saying that the lockdown was bad for children.” ROBBINS: “Those kids had two years of socialization robbed from them.” ROGAN: “Imagine if that was your senior year of high school.” ROBBINS: “Kids stopped making eye contact with each other when the lockdowns ended. They were completely desocialized. All they would do is look at the floor.” ROGAN: “It’s so critical for toddlers to develop by reading people’s faces. Imagine being a toddler and seeing everyone with a mask on. Everyone is robbing a bank now? This is nuts.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

363,198 views • 24 days ago

Dr. Tracy Høeg (Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD) tells Congress that the highest quality scientific evidence has consistently shown that masks do not work, school closures were not necessary, and six feet of distancing was not based on science: "We've had evidence prior to the pandemic that masks were largely ineffective at preventing community transmission of influenza and other upper respiratory viruses, and we did not obtain any new high-quality evidence during COVID-19 that masks are an effective mitigation strategy. We have several confounded observational studies, many of which were actually published by the CDC, that have severe flaws in them, that unfortunately led people to believe that masking children was going to be effective and necessary to keep children in schools. But the highest quality data we have, for example, from a Cochrane review of randomized studies, has not found evidence that masks are effective. It wasn't science-based, and the six feet of distance was arbitrary... We should have by default kept our schools open, but instead, we required non-evidence-based mitigation strategies as a prerequisite for getting our children back into school."

Dr. Tracy Høeg (Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD) tells Congress that the highest quality scientific evidence has consistently shown that masks do not work, school closures were not necessary, and six feet of distancing was not based on science: "We've had evidence prior to the pandemic that masks were largely ineffective at preventing community transmission of influenza and other upper respiratory viruses, and we did not obtain any new high-quality evidence during COVID-19 that masks are an effective mitigation strategy. We have several confounded observational studies, many of which were actually published by the CDC, that have severe flaws in them, that unfortunately led people to believe that masking children was going to be effective and necessary to keep children in schools. But the highest quality data we have, for example, from a Cochrane review of randomized studies, has not found evidence that masks are effective. It wasn't science-based, and the six feet of distance was arbitrary... We should have by default kept our schools open, but instead, we required non-evidence-based mitigation strategies as a prerequisite for getting our children back into school."

KanekoaTheGreat

1,134,598 views • 3 years ago

🚨 FLORIDA GOV. RON DESANTIS JUST NOW: "A pandemic is like the Super Bowl for somebody [like Fauci!] And yet he was WRONG about lockdowns. He was WRONG about masks. He was WRONG about school closures. He made up the six foot social distancing. He was wrong about demanding restaurants be closed!" "And so this is the Super Bowl. This is what you live for in that field. And he was wrong about all those things!" "I know that firsthand, because I was clashing with him on all of those issues in those early months of COVID, he would come down to Florida and do TV hits on local news attacking me for mandating that schools be open." "And he would come in for allowing restaurants to function and all this other stuff." "He would even host conference calls with mayors and counties as a way to circumvent our policies and to impose mandates. And we BLOCKED IT." 🔥

🚨 FLORIDA GOV. RON DESANTIS JUST NOW: "A pandemic is like the Super Bowl for somebody [like Fauci!] And yet he was WRONG about lockdowns. He was WRONG about masks. He was WRONG about school closures. He made up the six foot social distancing. He was wrong about demanding restaurants be closed!" "And so this is the Super Bowl. This is what you live for in that field. And he was wrong about all those things!" "I know that firsthand, because I was clashing with him on all of those issues in those early months of COVID, he would come down to Florida and do TV hits on local news attacking me for mandating that schools be open." "And he would come in for allowing restaurants to function and all this other stuff." "He would even host conference calls with mayors and counties as a way to circumvent our policies and to impose mandates. And we BLOCKED IT." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

34,133 views • 24 days ago

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy Avoids Answering Why Fauci Lied About Masks Burnett: “Do you see how some find this an extremely significant statement?…Our kids had to wear masks for an extra year and a half in school.” Murthy: “Sometimes the guidance does evolve over time”

U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy Avoids Answering Why Fauci Lied About Masks Burnett: “Do you see how some find this an extremely significant statement?…Our kids had to wear masks for an extra year and a half in school.” Murthy: “Sometimes the guidance does evolve over time”

Chief Nerd

976,131 views • 3 years ago

NEW: Joy Behar FUMES at the thought that Trump would say anything bad about masks or Dr. Fauci. “He attacked Dr. Fauci, who was really trying to help everybody.” “He pushed deworming medication for horses on us.” “During COVID, he said, no masks. You don’t need masks. That was also BS.” Joy is forgetting that the Cochrane review on masks, published in January 2023, concluded that masks have minimal to NO impact on transmission. And Trump never pushed ivermectin. But now that we’re on the subject, it is one of the safest HUMAN medicines in existence, its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015, and it is credited for bringing river blindness to the brink of extinction.

NEW: Joy Behar FUMES at the thought that Trump would say anything bad about masks or Dr. Fauci. “He attacked Dr. Fauci, who was really trying to help everybody.” “He pushed deworming medication for horses on us.” “During COVID, he said, no masks. You don’t need masks. That was also BS.” Joy is forgetting that the Cochrane review on masks, published in January 2023, concluded that masks have minimal to NO impact on transmission. And Trump never pushed ivermectin. But now that we’re on the subject, it is one of the safest HUMAN medicines in existence, its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015, and it is credited for bringing river blindness to the brink of extinction.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,653,241 views • 1 year ago

FOX NEWS: When it comes to masks and federal agents, is that something the Republicans will stand firm on? HUSTED: That's something for the president, and Tom Homan, and DHS to determine what's safe. It's been below 0 in Minneapolis. If you're going to be doing work outside, having a mask on is a practical issue.

FOX NEWS: When it comes to masks and federal agents, is that something the Republicans will stand firm on? HUSTED: That's something for the president, and Tom Homan, and DHS to determine what's safe. It's been below 0 in Minneapolis. If you're going to be doing work outside, having a mask on is a practical issue.

Aaron Rupar

84,049 views • 6 months ago

🚨 DESANTIS ON FAUCI: “MOST DESTRUCTIVE BUREAUCRAT IN U.S. HISTORY” He was wrong about lockdowns. Wrong about masks. Wrong about school closures. Wrong about the 6-foot rule he made up. Wrong about closing restaurants. And when governors like DeSantis fought back, Fauci went on local TV to attack them and tried to undermine state policy behind the scenes. Today he sat there taking the Fifth over and over. A million dead. Kids locked out of school. Businesses destroyed. And the man who drove so much of it still won’t answer basic questions. Accountability is long overdue.

🚨 DESANTIS ON FAUCI: “MOST DESTRUCTIVE BUREAUCRAT IN U.S. HISTORY” He was wrong about lockdowns. Wrong about masks. Wrong about school closures. Wrong about the 6-foot rule he made up. Wrong about closing restaurants. And when governors like DeSantis fought back, Fauci went on local TV to attack them and tried to undermine state policy behind the scenes. Today he sat there taking the Fifth over and over. A million dead. Kids locked out of school. Businesses destroyed. And the man who drove so much of it still won’t answer basic questions. Accountability is long overdue.

Gunther Eagleman™

36,009 views • 24 days ago

When Questioning a Government School Becomes a Confrontation A school is supposed to be a place where children learn to question the world. But in Jodhwas, Alwar, Rajasthan, the questions appear to have travelled in the opposite direction — from citizens to the state. The supplied video shows CJP co-convenor Ashutosh Ranka confronting officials during the School Thik Karo campaign, pressing them over the condition of the school and the basic facilities available to children. The accompanying transcript captures questions about the school's condition and the water being provided to students. This is not merely about one school. A nationwide School Thik Karo campaign has been launched to examine government-school infrastructure and basic amenities. Recent reporting confirms that CJP teams have begun school inspections, while the Rajasthan government has simultaneously issued restrictions on unauthorised entry, photography and videography inside government schools. And that raises the uncomfortable question: Why should the condition of a government school become something to hide rather than something to fix? If children lack safe drinking water, adequate infrastructure or basic facilities, the answer cannot be to control the camera. The answer must be to repair the classroom. The real test of governance is not the grandeur of a government building, a slogan, or a publicity campaign. It is whether a child sitting in the last classroom of a government school receives the dignity that the Constitution promises every citizen. A democracy should never be frightened by questions asked on behalf of children. Fix the school. Listen to the children. Answer the citizens. Credit: CJP / Original video source "Original Instagram Reel" #DimagiNaxal

When Questioning a Government School Becomes a Confrontation A school is supposed to be a place where children learn to question the world. But in Jodhwas, Alwar, Rajasthan, the questions appear to have travelled in the opposite direction — from citizens to the state. The supplied video shows CJP co-convenor Ashutosh Ranka confronting officials during the School Thik Karo campaign, pressing them over the condition of the school and the basic facilities available to children. The accompanying transcript captures questions about the school's condition and the water being provided to students. This is not merely about one school. A nationwide School Thik Karo campaign has been launched to examine government-school infrastructure and basic amenities. Recent reporting confirms that CJP teams have begun school inspections, while the Rajasthan government has simultaneously issued restrictions on unauthorised entry, photography and videography inside government schools. And that raises the uncomfortable question: Why should the condition of a government school become something to hide rather than something to fix? If children lack safe drinking water, adequate infrastructure or basic facilities, the answer cannot be to control the camera. The answer must be to repair the classroom. The real test of governance is not the grandeur of a government building, a slogan, or a publicity campaign. It is whether a child sitting in the last classroom of a government school receives the dignity that the Constitution promises every citizen. A democracy should never be frightened by questions asked on behalf of children. Fix the school. Listen to the children. Answer the citizens. Credit: CJP / Original video source "Original Instagram Reel" #DimagiNaxal

Ashok Dadhwal

91,064 views • 6 days ago

Kristi Noem: "They talk about masks. They're the party that in 2020 mandated masks and penalized and put crimes on US citizens if they didn't have a mask on, and now they don't want our law enforcement officers to be protected from doxxing." (Trump in fact was the president in 2020.)

Kristi Noem: "They talk about masks. They're the party that in 2020 mandated masks and penalized and put crimes on US citizens if they didn't have a mask on, and now they don't want our law enforcement officers to be protected from doxxing." (Trump in fact was the president in 2020.)

Aaron Rupar

151,935 views • 5 months ago

THIS IS THE FUTURE OF CHINA— children working hard in their studies, making use of every moment on their way to and from school, while parents work for a greater China for their children.

THIS IS THE FUTURE OF CHINA— children working hard in their studies, making use of every moment on their way to and from school, while parents work for a greater China for their children.

China pulse 🇨🇳

69,969 views • 3 months ago

JUST IN: Teacher at MobilePublicSchools calling herself “Mother of Exiles” was placed on leave after sending an unauthorized email to students containing a guide on how to avoid ICE. The email included instructions to text the teacher if ICE agents show up anywhere and falsely notified parents that they would not be penalized if they kept their children home. The school stated that they would follow all federal mandates and would cooperate with federal agents if they showed up on campus.

JUST IN: Teacher at MobilePublicSchools calling herself “Mother of Exiles” was placed on leave after sending an unauthorized email to students containing a guide on how to avoid ICE. The email included instructions to text the teacher if ICE agents show up anywhere and falsely notified parents that they would not be penalized if they kept their children home. The school stated that they would follow all federal mandates and would cooperate with federal agents if they showed up on campus.

Libs of TikTok

382,630 views • 1 year ago

NEW: CNN blindsides Fauci on live air with a study saying masks don’t work. You know it’s getting bad when even CNN is calling him out. After getting called out, Fauci gave a long-winded answer by saying there were “other studies.” But what did 2020 Fauci have to say about masks? “There's no reason to be walking around with a mask when you are in the middle of an outbreak. Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.”

NEW: CNN blindsides Fauci on live air with a study saying masks don’t work. You know it’s getting bad when even CNN is calling him out. After getting called out, Fauci gave a long-winded answer by saying there were “other studies.” But what did 2020 Fauci have to say about masks? “There's no reason to be walking around with a mask when you are in the middle of an outbreak. Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.”

Collin Rugg

3,055,608 views • 3 years ago