Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
In blockchain governance, undetected bugs can pose significant risks. Our Formal Verification of TON's blockchain contracts had revealed the "Missing Stake Bug," which could have caused loss of staked funds or compromised network security, this issue has since been addressed proactively by the team.
340,375 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

Traditional audits alone might miss subtle but significant bugs. By formally verifying TON’s governance contracts, we ensured that the voting stakes are correctly tracked and locked, preventing potential fund loss and enhancing consensus integrity.

Auditing smart contracts in the FunC language presents unique challenges. Our team navigated this complexity to uncover vulnerabilities in TON's staking process. We're pleased to see that TON has proactively addressed this issue, demonstrating their commitment to enhanced security.

The "Missing Stake Bug" in TON could have reduced the difficulty of consensus attacks or lead to permanent loss of tokens. Our Formal Verification process identified this risk, ensuring that such vulnerabilities are addressed before they can be exploited.

Want to learn more about how Formal Verification protects blockchain integrity? Explore our detailed analysis of TON’s governance contracts. Read the full blog:

#SaitaChain

tarnish

Intelligent nodes go brrr 💨💻 @din_lol_ GODIN

Furkan ortalık calkalaniyor dünya biliyir sen burda trolluk yapacam diye kacirdinmi. Yazık onunedemi düşmedi burda yalanın batsın şimdi haberin olmusmus. Vicdansiz

Manyaklık akıl hatalığı olanın imanı sahih deldir ! İman özgür ve akıllı olmak gerektirir. Bu elbet filli özgürlük gibi akli düşünce özgürlüğü gerektirir!

Let’s goo
