Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

In General Relativity and Quantum Gravity, diffeomorphism often called diffeomorphism invariance or general covariance is an isomorphism of differentiable manifolds that defines the physical nature of spacetime. Rather than a mathematical tool, diffeomorphism is a smooth, bijective (invertible) mapping between two open sets where both the function and its...

Dragonmaurizio's profile picture

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

7,910 subscribers

29,093 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Jensen's inequality gives the difference between the average value of a convex function φ, and its value at the center, where both “average” and “center” are defined in terms of some distribution p_X. When the function φ is flat, or the distribution is narrow, they agree.
0:18

Jensen's inequality gives the difference between the average value of a convex function φ, and its value at the center, where both “average” and “center” are defined in terms of some distribution p_X. When the function φ is flat, or the distribution is narrow, they agree.

Keenan Crane

185,579 просмотров • 1 год назад

New Subquantum Informational Mechanics framework (NMSI). A radical mathematical shift in fundamental physics is introduced in the NMSI, inferring that information rather than energy or matter is the fundamental substrate of reality. The Universe isn’t expanding and doesn’t die thermally, the vacuum is not empty, but is an active medium composed of elementary units of information called infobits which self-organize through progressive compaction onto dynamically viable structures. The cosmic evolution is governed by optimal informational transport modeled upon a substrate called the Riemann Oscillatory Network (RON). The radical concept treats physical fields such as EM & gravity as emergent properties of a Coherent Logical Oscillator influenced by the Riemann zeta function (ζ) that governs the organization of space, time and mass. 🔗
0:12

New Subquantum Informational Mechanics framework (NMSI). A radical mathematical shift in fundamental physics is introduced in the NMSI, inferring that information rather than energy or matter is the fundamental substrate of reality. The Universe isn’t expanding and doesn’t die thermally, the vacuum is not empty, but is an active medium composed of elementary units of information called infobits which self-organize through progressive compaction onto dynamically viable structures. The cosmic evolution is governed by optimal informational transport modeled upon a substrate called the Riemann Oscillatory Network (RON). The radical concept treats physical fields such as EM & gravity as emergent properties of a Coherent Logical Oscillator influenced by the Riemann zeta function (ζ) that governs the organization of space, time and mass. 🔗

Maurizio Iβα

11,137 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Our best descriptions of nature, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are failing us. To dig into the deepest levels of reality, we’re going to need new physics.
0:18

Our best descriptions of nature, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are failing us. To dig into the deepest levels of reality, we’re going to need new physics.

Quanta Magazine

29,455 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trans-identified males are obsessed with the notion that they will be raped or abused if they use male spaces. The reason for this obsession is that, more often than not, they are using porn that depicts women being bound and / or assaulted (or men 'forcibly' transformed into women by way of sexual abuse), which they find sexually thrilling. It is a masochistic humiliation fetish. Such men see being a woman as something humiliating. (And by the time they begin "identifying" as a little girl, they've already consumed a substantial amount of BDSM content.) When these concepts are repeated in the media, the result is not only to validate the fetish, but also to humiliate women, by proxy, for the pleasure of men with this fetish.
0:07

Trans-identified males are obsessed with the notion that they will be raped or abused if they use male spaces. The reason for this obsession is that, more often than not, they are using porn that depicts women being bound and / or assaulted (or men 'forcibly' transformed into women by way of sexual abuse), which they find sexually thrilling. It is a masochistic humiliation fetish. Such men see being a woman as something humiliating. (And by the time they begin "identifying" as a little girl, they've already consumed a substantial amount of BDSM content.) When these concepts are repeated in the media, the result is not only to validate the fetish, but also to humiliate women, by proxy, for the pleasure of men with this fetish.

Genevieve Gluck

112,949 просмотров • 1 год назад

Gravity is not an invisible force pulling objects across empty space. In General Relativity, mass tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells mass how to move. The Sun’s 1.989 × 10³⁰ kg mass depresses four-dimensional spacetime into a deep gravitational throat. Earth and Jupiter are simply traveling along straight inertial paths called geodesics (d²xᵘ/dτ² + Γᵘₐᵦ uᵅuᵝ = 0) through the warped geometry of the universe.
0:12

Gravity is not an invisible force pulling objects across empty space. In General Relativity, mass tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells mass how to move. The Sun’s 1.989 × 10³⁰ kg mass depresses four-dimensional spacetime into a deep gravitational throat. Earth and Jupiter are simply traveling along straight inertial paths called geodesics (d²xᵘ/dτ² + Γᵘₐᵦ uᵅuᵝ = 0) through the warped geometry of the universe.

Philosophy Of Physics

31,969 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Black Hole Singularity; It is the theoretical center of a black hole, predicted by general relativity as a point of infinite density, zero volume, and infinite spacetime curvature. It is where matter is crushed, laws of physics break down, and gravity is absolute, representing a "point of no return" within the event horizon.
0:13

Black Hole Singularity; It is the theoretical center of a black hole, predicted by general relativity as a point of infinite density, zero volume, and infinite spacetime curvature. It is where matter is crushed, laws of physics break down, and gravity is absolute, representing a "point of no return" within the event horizon.

Philosophy Of Physics

33,802 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

An oath is a constitutional commitment, not a personalized or customized pledge. The Constitution permits only two forms: “In the name of God”, if you are religious. “Solemnly affirm”, if you are non-religious. This ensures that public office remains above individuals and personalities.
0:13

An oath is a constitutional commitment, not a personalized or customized pledge. The Constitution permits only two forms: “In the name of God”, if you are religious. “Solemnly affirm”, if you are non-religious. This ensures that public office remains above individuals and personalities.

ಅಲ್ಪಸಂಖ್ಯಾತ

49,192 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Epic gets a lot of criticism but they have ALWAYS had AMAZING skybox art and cloud PHYSICS. The sky is always beautiful along with all the animations that are SMOOTH and FLUID.
0:13

Epic gets a lot of criticism but they have ALWAYS had AMAZING skybox art and cloud PHYSICS. The sky is always beautiful along with all the animations that are SMOOTH and FLUID.

Windpress

18,769 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Every force in the universe has a quantum version. Electromagnetism has the photon, the strong force has gluons, the weak force its bosons. Gravity has nothing proven till now… Every time physicists try to quantize it the way they did the others, the math detonates, infinities piling on infinities. This is the quiet scandal at the center of physics. Our two best theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are each spectacularly correct, and they cannot stand to be in the same room.
0:13

Every force in the universe has a quantum version. Electromagnetism has the photon, the strong force has gluons, the weak force its bosons. Gravity has nothing proven till now… Every time physicists try to quantize it the way they did the others, the math detonates, infinities piling on infinities. This is the quiet scandal at the center of physics. Our two best theories, quantum mechanics and general relativity, are each spectacularly correct, and they cannot stand to be in the same room.

Kekius Maximus

21,230 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The very fabric of space-time at the smallest scales is thought to be extremely turbulent and chaotic, described as a frothy sea called quantum foam. This concept, stemming from quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggests that the very nature of space-time is bubbling with tiny wormholes and fluctuations that appear and disappear within fractions of a second. 📷by Johann Rosario
0:11

The very fabric of space-time at the smallest scales is thought to be extremely turbulent and chaotic, described as a frothy sea called quantum foam. This concept, stemming from quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggests that the very nature of space-time is bubbling with tiny wormholes and fluctuations that appear and disappear within fractions of a second. 📷by Johann Rosario

Physics In History

1,107,013 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The very fabric of space-time at the smallest scales is thought to be extremely turbulent and chaotic, described as a frothy sea called quantum foam. This concept, stemming from quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggests that the very nature of space-time is bubbling with tiny wormholes and fluctuations that appear and disappear within fractions of a second. 📷by Johann Rosario
0:11

The very fabric of space-time at the smallest scales is thought to be extremely turbulent and chaotic, described as a frothy sea called quantum foam. This concept, stemming from quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggests that the very nature of space-time is bubbling with tiny wormholes and fluctuations that appear and disappear within fractions of a second. 📷by Johann Rosario

Physics In History

34,556 просмотров • 6 дней назад

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.
0:10

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.

Op. Dr. Mehmet Bekir Şen

598,944 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

☍ The Ouroboros as a function of the form. Under mathematical laws, lambda calculus, and space phase geometry, the Ouroboros principle is translated into self referential recursive cycle and fixed point closure, outlining a function operating on itself, expressed by the equation 𝒻(𝒻) = 𝒻. The formula simply yields the process where the output becomes input without escaping the system. This logic relies on distinctions that point back to the observer, creating a self-containing universe of rules. Systems theory uses the Ouroboros to describe feedback loops where not only the result regulates the hierarchical structure itself, but also signifies immutability and independence from external interference. In theoretical biology the Ouroboros is strictly related to the autopoiesis function of self procreation in which living networks preserve themselves through internal circular regeneration. 🔗
0:12

☍ The Ouroboros as a function of the form. Under mathematical laws, lambda calculus, and space phase geometry, the Ouroboros principle is translated into self referential recursive cycle and fixed point closure, outlining a function operating on itself, expressed by the equation 𝒻(𝒻) = 𝒻. The formula simply yields the process where the output becomes input without escaping the system. This logic relies on distinctions that point back to the observer, creating a self-containing universe of rules. Systems theory uses the Ouroboros to describe feedback loops where not only the result regulates the hierarchical structure itself, but also signifies immutability and independence from external interference. In theoretical biology the Ouroboros is strictly related to the autopoiesis function of self procreation in which living networks preserve themselves through internal circular regeneration. 🔗

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

29,190 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗
0:12

🫯 A conflicting physical ontology ! One of the strangest properties in particle physics is the spin. The term spin is a historical misnomer. Electrons (𝑒⁻) do not physically rotate like a spinning top or a globe. Spin is a fundamental quantum property known as intrinsic angular momentum which exists as an inherent characteristic of the particle, much like its mass or electric charge. In quantum mechanics, electrons are treated as fundamental point-like particles with zero size, making the concept of physical 3D rotation nonsensical. A rotating electrical charge creates a magnetic field. An electron naturally possesses its own detectable magnetic field. Even though the electron isn't physically spinning, it acts exactly as if it were because of that. Moreover the spin of an 𝑒⁻ has orientation. As 𝑒⁻ carry a negative electric charge, their inherent spin turns them into tiny bar magnets. Two possible orientations exist in the natural state of the 𝑒⁻, spin up and spin down. When measured along a specific direction (called the z-axis) the 𝑒⁻ can only display one of the two orientation state, up or down. But the strangeness goes a bit further; when an 𝑒⁻ is misplaced or removed from its own orbit, it takes two full circles (720°) to return to its original quantum state. The spin isn’t motion, it’s an undeniable static, resilient force of this elementary particle, listed as one the fundamental constant of nature. 🔗

𝓜𝒂𝒖𝒓𝒊𝔃𝒊𝒐 𝗜𝒃𝛼

22,933 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

THE STORM IS PART OF THE WEATHER OF THE SOUL To attempt control is to enter the oldest of traps. The more the ego tightens its grip, the more the shadow learns the precise contours of that grip and slips free, for it is not a thing that can be owned but a living intelligence that mirrors the very resistance used against it. Everyone carries one, not as punishment but as the necessary counterpart to light. It has no name because it is not a separate being but the underside of one’s own consciousness, fluid and adaptive precisely so that it cannot be fixed, labeled or subdued. The true path is not domination but the slow alchemy of living above it—raising the seat of awareness high enough that the demon’s movements are seen without being followed, felt without being enacted, honored as raw power without being granted the throne.
0:19

THE STORM IS PART OF THE WEATHER OF THE SOUL To attempt control is to enter the oldest of traps. The more the ego tightens its grip, the more the shadow learns the precise contours of that grip and slips free, for it is not a thing that can be owned but a living intelligence that mirrors the very resistance used against it. Everyone carries one, not as punishment but as the necessary counterpart to light. It has no name because it is not a separate being but the underside of one’s own consciousness, fluid and adaptive precisely so that it cannot be fixed, labeled or subdued. The true path is not domination but the slow alchemy of living above it—raising the seat of awareness high enough that the demon’s movements are seen without being followed, felt without being enacted, honored as raw power without being granted the throne.

🧬Maxpein🧬

11,684 просмотров • 21 дней назад

QUOTE 1: A worldview without feelings is a cold structure; feelings without a worldview are a blind force. : The author offers a precise and balanced insight into the relationship between intellect and emotion. A worldview without feelings becomes a cold, lifeless structure rational but empty, capable of logic yet devoid of warmth or motivation. Conversely, feelings without a coherent worldview become a blind force powerful but directionless, easily manipulated or destructive. True human maturity requires the harmonious union of both. The mind provides clarity, structure, and long-term vision. Feelings supply energy, empathy, and moral intuition. When integrated, they create a living philosophy: thought that is compassionate and emotion that is wise. This synthesis is the foundation of a complete human being. Without it, we risk becoming either heartless calculators or passionate but reckless actors. The highest expressions of humanity justice, creativity, love, and wisdom arise only when reason and feeling work together as equal partners. QUOTE 2: The unity of humanity is not a dream but a necessity: it is the only path to universal security. : The author asserts that the unity of humanity is not an idealistic dream but a fundamental necessity. In an interconnected world facing global threats climate change, pandemics, nuclear risks, resource scarcity, and technological disruption fragmented efforts and national rivalries are no longer sustainable. True universal security cannot be achieved through dominance, isolation, or temporary alliances. It requires a higher level of human solidarity: shared institutions, mutual trust, collective responsibility, and a common commitment to the survival and flourishing of our species. Without unity, every nation remains vulnerable, no matter how powerful. Unity does not mean erasing diversity or sovereignty. It means building a framework in which differences are respected while common survival imperatives are placed above them. It is the recognition that in the 21st century and beyond, humanity’s fate is collective. The path to lasting security runs through unity. Anything less is merely managed risk.
0:13

QUOTE 1: A worldview without feelings is a cold structure; feelings without a worldview are a blind force. : The author offers a precise and balanced insight into the relationship between intellect and emotion. A worldview without feelings becomes a cold, lifeless structure rational but empty, capable of logic yet devoid of warmth or motivation. Conversely, feelings without a coherent worldview become a blind force powerful but directionless, easily manipulated or destructive. True human maturity requires the harmonious union of both. The mind provides clarity, structure, and long-term vision. Feelings supply energy, empathy, and moral intuition. When integrated, they create a living philosophy: thought that is compassionate and emotion that is wise. This synthesis is the foundation of a complete human being. Without it, we risk becoming either heartless calculators or passionate but reckless actors. The highest expressions of humanity justice, creativity, love, and wisdom arise only when reason and feeling work together as equal partners. QUOTE 2: The unity of humanity is not a dream but a necessity: it is the only path to universal security. : The author asserts that the unity of humanity is not an idealistic dream but a fundamental necessity. In an interconnected world facing global threats climate change, pandemics, nuclear risks, resource scarcity, and technological disruption fragmented efforts and national rivalries are no longer sustainable. True universal security cannot be achieved through dominance, isolation, or temporary alliances. It requires a higher level of human solidarity: shared institutions, mutual trust, collective responsibility, and a common commitment to the survival and flourishing of our species. Without unity, every nation remains vulnerable, no matter how powerful. Unity does not mean erasing diversity or sovereignty. It means building a framework in which differences are respected while common survival imperatives are placed above them. It is the recognition that in the 21st century and beyond, humanity’s fate is collective. The path to lasting security runs through unity. Anything less is merely managed risk.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

8,066,439 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: OPENAI JUST COLLIDED WITH THE TOPOLOGICAL LIMIT OF THE UNIVERSE! THE END OF CONTINUOUS SPACE. 🚨 The scientific world is shaking. The Clay Mathematics Institute is reviewing a groundbreaking milestone regarding the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. And at the center of this earthquake is OpenAI, whose reasoning models just tackled the equations that govern every fluid in our world. In 1822, Navier added viscosity to Euler's laws. In 1845, Stokes finalized them: ρ(∂v/∂t + v·∇v) = −∇p + μ∇²v + f (For incompressible flow, ∇·v = 0 closes the system). For over a century, mathematicians assumed that these equations must have smooth, perfectly continuous solutions in 3D space. You see these equations in motion everywhere - like the chaotic wake behind a moving cylinder. But the official verification of infinite "3-D smoothness" has always hit a wall. What did OpenAI do? By unleashing raw mathematical reasoning upon the Navier-Stokes problem, the AI mapped the ultimate limits of these equations, exposing an inescapable truth: the math inevitably blows up into impossible singularities. The model demonstrated that forcing infinite smoothness onto 3D fluid equations creates unavoidable mathematical contradictions. WHY DOES THIS HAPPEN? Mainstream science is finally hitting the exact geometric wall we mapped years ago. You CANNOT have infinite "3-D smoothness" because the universe is NOT an infinitely continuous void! Just as we rigorously proved that the Yang-Mills Mass Gap is topologically ILL-POSED and mathematically impossible on a continuous ℝ⁴ space, the Navier-Stokes breakdown reveals the exact same systemic error in classical physics. When you force continuous mathematics (ℝ⁴) onto a universe that is fundamentally discrete, the equations inevitably crash into singularities. 🛡️ THE SOLUTION: OUR COMPACT CONSTRUCTIBLE MANIFOLD Here is the ultimate breakthrough: On our IT³ manifold, this problem completely ceases to exist! When you abandon the sterile, infinite void of ℝ⁴ and move the physics to a compact constructible manifold (M_tot = S⁴ × T³), the mathematical explosions are structurally forbidden. Because our space is a closed topological geometry dictated by the strict √1 : √2 : √3 metric, the physical fields are naturally bounded by the geometry itself. Infinite singularities simply cannot form on a compact manifold. What mathematicians call "fluid blow-ups" are just the exact topological moments where macroscopic matter violently collides with the rigid, discrete geometric grid of the vacuum! OpenAI’s logic engine correctly identified that infinite smoothness is a mathematical fiction. The universe does not allow infinite division. The illusion of the continuous, smooth ℝ⁴ universe is officially collapsing across all disciplines - from quantum mechanics to fluid dynamics. The future belongs to discrete topology. Preprint. Open Source: The Yang-Mills Mass Gap on R^4 Is Ill-Posed, and on a Compact Constructible Manifold It Is Automatic God geometrizes! 📐🌌
0:20

🚨 BREAKING: OPENAI JUST COLLIDED WITH THE TOPOLOGICAL LIMIT OF THE UNIVERSE! THE END OF CONTINUOUS SPACE. 🚨 The scientific world is shaking. The Clay Mathematics Institute is reviewing a groundbreaking milestone regarding the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem. And at the center of this earthquake is OpenAI, whose reasoning models just tackled the equations that govern every fluid in our world. In 1822, Navier added viscosity to Euler's laws. In 1845, Stokes finalized them: ρ(∂v/∂t + v·∇v) = −∇p + μ∇²v + f (For incompressible flow, ∇·v = 0 closes the system). For over a century, mathematicians assumed that these equations must have smooth, perfectly continuous solutions in 3D space. You see these equations in motion everywhere - like the chaotic wake behind a moving cylinder. But the official verification of infinite "3-D smoothness" has always hit a wall. What did OpenAI do? By unleashing raw mathematical reasoning upon the Navier-Stokes problem, the AI mapped the ultimate limits of these equations, exposing an inescapable truth: the math inevitably blows up into impossible singularities. The model demonstrated that forcing infinite smoothness onto 3D fluid equations creates unavoidable mathematical contradictions. WHY DOES THIS HAPPEN? Mainstream science is finally hitting the exact geometric wall we mapped years ago. You CANNOT have infinite "3-D smoothness" because the universe is NOT an infinitely continuous void! Just as we rigorously proved that the Yang-Mills Mass Gap is topologically ILL-POSED and mathematically impossible on a continuous ℝ⁴ space, the Navier-Stokes breakdown reveals the exact same systemic error in classical physics. When you force continuous mathematics (ℝ⁴) onto a universe that is fundamentally discrete, the equations inevitably crash into singularities. 🛡️ THE SOLUTION: OUR COMPACT CONSTRUCTIBLE MANIFOLD Here is the ultimate breakthrough: On our IT³ manifold, this problem completely ceases to exist! When you abandon the sterile, infinite void of ℝ⁴ and move the physics to a compact constructible manifold (M_tot = S⁴ × T³), the mathematical explosions are structurally forbidden. Because our space is a closed topological geometry dictated by the strict √1 : √2 : √3 metric, the physical fields are naturally bounded by the geometry itself. Infinite singularities simply cannot form on a compact manifold. What mathematicians call "fluid blow-ups" are just the exact topological moments where macroscopic matter violently collides with the rigid, discrete geometric grid of the vacuum! OpenAI’s logic engine correctly identified that infinite smoothness is a mathematical fiction. The universe does not allow infinite division. The illusion of the continuous, smooth ℝ⁴ universe is officially collapsing across all disciplines - from quantum mechanics to fluid dynamics. The future belongs to discrete topology. Preprint. Open Source: The Yang-Mills Mass Gap on R^4 Is Ill-Posed, and on a Compact Constructible Manifold It Is Automatic God geometrizes! 📐🌌

Dr. Logvinovich

216,446 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Different observers can disagree about space and time without disagreeing about the laws of physics. In Minkowski spacetime, observers moving relative to one another use different space and time axes, connected by the Lorentz transformation. What remains unchanged is the spacetime interval and the structure of the light cone. Space and time coordinates depend on the observer, but the speed of light and the causal structure of spacetime do not.
0:10

Different observers can disagree about space and time without disagreeing about the laws of physics. In Minkowski spacetime, observers moving relative to one another use different space and time axes, connected by the Lorentz transformation. What remains unchanged is the spacetime interval and the structure of the light cone. Space and time coordinates depend on the observer, but the speed of light and the causal structure of spacetime do not.

Philosophy Of Physics

27,472 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I think a big mistake is believing that if something is here, we should be able to see it. Right? The lights in the sky and the pilots or the gods or whatever they are? I think we assume out of arrogance and ego. An insect can crawl across your hand and never understand that you are a whole entire being. It only experiences pressure, heat, vibration, and movement. A fingertip appears. A shadow passes. The insect never sees the body attached to it. The insect does not have access to the full image. Ever. I think our situation may be exactly the same. Whatever people call the phenomenon, nonhuman intelligence, gods, or something else entirely, may be present in full while we only register a portion of it. We notice effects, not the actual being. Changes in perception. Anomalies. We expect a face when all we are capable of sensing is the fingertip. Let me explain. Reports are always partial and strange. Lights, shapes, impressions, symbols, missing time, pressure, fear, calm. None of it ever shows us a full being, or the real craft; because our senses are not built to assemble it. Just like the ant cannot assemble a human from a few sensations. Now that doesn't mean what we are seeing is fake. It means the insect’s world is smaller than the thing interacting with it. I get sick of people saying there is no there there, I think they are making the same mistake the insect would make. Our reality is likely a thin slice of what actually exists. We move through a world full of forces and intelligences that exceed our resolution. We are not seeing nothing. We are seeing effects. And effects are often the only honest proof a limited observer ever gets.
0:10

I think a big mistake is believing that if something is here, we should be able to see it. Right? The lights in the sky and the pilots or the gods or whatever they are? I think we assume out of arrogance and ego. An insect can crawl across your hand and never understand that you are a whole entire being. It only experiences pressure, heat, vibration, and movement. A fingertip appears. A shadow passes. The insect never sees the body attached to it. The insect does not have access to the full image. Ever. I think our situation may be exactly the same. Whatever people call the phenomenon, nonhuman intelligence, gods, or something else entirely, may be present in full while we only register a portion of it. We notice effects, not the actual being. Changes in perception. Anomalies. We expect a face when all we are capable of sensing is the fingertip. Let me explain. Reports are always partial and strange. Lights, shapes, impressions, symbols, missing time, pressure, fear, calm. None of it ever shows us a full being, or the real craft; because our senses are not built to assemble it. Just like the ant cannot assemble a human from a few sensations. Now that doesn't mean what we are seeing is fake. It means the insect’s world is smaller than the thing interacting with it. I get sick of people saying there is no there there, I think they are making the same mistake the insect would make. Our reality is likely a thin slice of what actually exists. We move through a world full of forces and intelligences that exceed our resolution. We are not seeing nothing. We are seeing effects. And effects are often the only honest proof a limited observer ever gets.

Jason Wilde

12,125 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад