Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

In his most recent appearance on the “India and Global Left” program, Norman Finkelstein avers that Yahya Sinwar and the Hamas leaders in Gaza who undertook Tufan al-Aqsa were undertaking an impulsive “gamble” rather than a strategic operation. When the interviewer (correctly) observes that there are reasons to believe...

MujammaHaraket's profile picture

Mujamma Haraket

10,134 subscribers

318,790 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

People sometimes find it hard to understand that criticising Zionism, even in as coruscating a fashion, as Norman Finkelstein has done, does not mean that you are an anti-Zionist. Nor does it mean that you support the full liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. In fact, as is reasonably widely known, Finkelstein has opposed the use of the phrase ‘from the river to the sea’. Now, in a livestream a couple of weeks ago, Finkelstein has appeared to go further, and has denounced three of the essential conceptual tools of analysis of the Zionist movement: Settler colonialism, decolonisation and De-Zionisation as “really stupid”, “idiotic”, “cringy”. Here is what he said (video is below): “There was a lot of really crazy political correctness. I have no doubt about that. They had classes on settler colonialism and decolonization and DeZionizing of the Jewish mind. You know, really stupid, cringy... You know these idiotic notions. It’s appalling from an educational point of view.” I am sorry to report that Norman Finkelstein is not an anti-Zionist and is not a supporter of the Liberation and decolonization of the Zionist settler colony. #DismantleZionism
0:24

People sometimes find it hard to understand that criticising Zionism, even in as coruscating a fashion, as Norman Finkelstein has done, does not mean that you are an anti-Zionist. Nor does it mean that you support the full liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. In fact, as is reasonably widely known, Finkelstein has opposed the use of the phrase ‘from the river to the sea’. Now, in a livestream a couple of weeks ago, Finkelstein has appeared to go further, and has denounced three of the essential conceptual tools of analysis of the Zionist movement: Settler colonialism, decolonisation and De-Zionisation as “really stupid”, “idiotic”, “cringy”. Here is what he said (video is below): “There was a lot of really crazy political correctness. I have no doubt about that. They had classes on settler colonialism and decolonization and DeZionizing of the Jewish mind. You know, really stupid, cringy... You know these idiotic notions. It’s appalling from an educational point of view.” I am sorry to report that Norman Finkelstein is not an anti-Zionist and is not a supporter of the Liberation and decolonization of the Zionist settler colony. #DismantleZionism

David Miller

137,573 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇮🇱🇵🇸 Gaza was NOT the place you thought it was... Norman Finkelstein discusses how educated Gaza had become, before Israel turned it into a moonscape: "It will come, perhaps as a surprise to many of your listeners, that godforsaken Gaza had one of the HIGHEST literacy rates in the WORLD before Oct. 7. Israel was, of course, fully cognizant of that fact, which is why it systematically destroyed 97% of the schools in Gaza." What do you do about a country that won't tolerate the prosperity of its neighbors? And why should 92% of Gazans lose their homes for the horrific crimes of a select few? Norman Finkelstein
3:20

🇮🇱🇵🇸 Gaza was NOT the place you thought it was... Norman Finkelstein discusses how educated Gaza had become, before Israel turned it into a moonscape: "It will come, perhaps as a surprise to many of your listeners, that godforsaken Gaza had one of the HIGHEST literacy rates in the WORLD before Oct. 7. Israel was, of course, fully cognizant of that fact, which is why it systematically destroyed 97% of the schools in Gaza." What do you do about a country that won't tolerate the prosperity of its neighbors? And why should 92% of Gazans lose their homes for the horrific crimes of a select few? Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

72,850 görüntüleme • 17 saat önce

“The greatest gift the enemy and occupation can give me is to assassinate me” In an old resurfaced video from a press conference in May 2021, Hamas Chief Yahya Sinwar, who was reportedly killed on Thursday by Israeli forces, said that he would rather die as “a martyr” at the hand of Israeli forces than “die a meaningless death.” Israel's government and military both confirmed on Thursday that Sinwar was killed in Gaza during a gunfight in an Israeli operation in Rafah. Hamas has not yet commented on Israel's announcement.
0:44

“The greatest gift the enemy and occupation can give me is to assassinate me” In an old resurfaced video from a press conference in May 2021, Hamas Chief Yahya Sinwar, who was reportedly killed on Thursday by Israeli forces, said that he would rather die as “a martyr” at the hand of Israeli forces than “die a meaningless death.” Israel's government and military both confirmed on Thursday that Sinwar was killed in Gaza during a gunfight in an Israeli operation in Rafah. Hamas has not yet commented on Israel's announcement.

Middle East Eye

73,982 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.
2:39

There’s a new claim that “essentially, all that happened was Trump got tired, took control and forced it on Netanyahu, and this is basically the same deal that could have been reached a year earlier,” with the disturbing implication, that’s horrible to say, that IDF soldiers died in vain for a cause that had already been achieved. So, let’s revisit the plans that were laid out by both the current and former American administrations to see if they match up. For example, the Biden plan from June 1, 2024, which was met with considerable enthusiasm, and was even later acknowledged as Netanyahu’s plan. I want to highlight the difference. In the first phase, the IDF should have already pulled back to roughly its current position, and then it was just about releasing humanitarian hostages. As if not all of them are “humanitarian.” Then it transitioned to discussing the release of living hostages. In this phase, the IDF would withdraw from all of Gaza, until the last centimetre, while all the dead hostages remain in Gaza. It’s as different as day and night. Here, everyone is returning, including the dead, and the IDF is still in half of Gaza. This isn’t just about some desire to maintain an occupation or garrison force, but rather to ensure that Hamas disarms — something that didn’t happen in the Biden proposal. So now let’s move on to the Witkoff plan, much closer to us, much better for Israel, but still different. There was talk of releasing half of the dead hostages, but then a temporary ceasefire for two months of negotiations to end the war, and then the IDF would withdraw from more places than it is now, and there would be a guarantee that the war would not be renewed. Once again, we see that there was no connection between the IDF remaining on the ground and the promise that Hamas would disarm, especially while some of the hostages are still there. The greatness of this outline is this issue. I also want to say something general about the matter of responsibility. As ridiculous as it was on October 7 and afterwards to hear from Netanyahu’s supporters that the one who is to blame is the IDF chief of staff, the Shin Bet chief, the attorney general and the Military Advocate General, and that Netanyahu has no part in it — it’s as ridiculous as it is that now they’re saying, “Thank you Trump and thank you Nitzan Alon, and thank you to all of them and to the Qatari prime minister, and Netanyahu and Ron Dermer have nothing to do with it at all.” Indeed, Netanyahu had a very large part in the failure of October 7, and he also has a very large part together with Dermer in this deal. By the way, how does that connect to what Kushner said tonight in Egypt? He said that both the prime minister and Dermer made very big compromises and took risks to see the end of the war. I would like to make a suggestion. Once upon a time, when there was only one channel and people didn’t like the commentators, they said, “Watch the game without the commentary.” I say, let’s watch Trump and Netanyahu’s move without the commentary, because there are a lot of conversations, and this and that, and slander, and sometimes even quotes, but in practice there has never been a president and a prime minister who acted like this, and the results are evident from Iran, through the Golan Heights, through the embassy and now Gaza.

Amit Segal

298,292 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🇵🇸🇮🇱 "THERE'S NO EVIDENCE THAT EVEN ONE RAPE OCCURRED ON OCTOBER 7TH" Norman Finkelstein says if you stick to serious human-rights investigations, the broad story of October 7 is clear, most of the killing was done by Hamas and other armed groups from Gaza, but some of the most shocking claims pushed by Israel, especially about mass, organized rape, just aren’t backed by solid evidence. He argues that building their whole story on that claim was not just wrong, but strategically stupid. "Roughly 1,200 people were killed on October 7th. About 400 of those people were combatants, and about 800 were civilians. On the other hand, I'm not seeing compelling evidence that contradicts the claim that, overwhelmingly, the deaths that occurred on October 7th are attributable to Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. On the more local level, I would say the main claim which does not hold up against the evidence, basically because there is no evidence, is the claim that Hamas weaponized rape on October 7th. However horrendous things happened on October 7th, you did not need to die on the hill of mass rape. They chose that hill to die on. There's no evidence that even one rape occurred on October 7th." Norman Finkelstein
4:12

🇵🇸🇮🇱 "THERE'S NO EVIDENCE THAT EVEN ONE RAPE OCCURRED ON OCTOBER 7TH" Norman Finkelstein says if you stick to serious human-rights investigations, the broad story of October 7 is clear, most of the killing was done by Hamas and other armed groups from Gaza, but some of the most shocking claims pushed by Israel, especially about mass, organized rape, just aren’t backed by solid evidence. He argues that building their whole story on that claim was not just wrong, but strategically stupid. "Roughly 1,200 people were killed on October 7th. About 400 of those people were combatants, and about 800 were civilians. On the other hand, I'm not seeing compelling evidence that contradicts the claim that, overwhelmingly, the deaths that occurred on October 7th are attributable to Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. On the more local level, I would say the main claim which does not hold up against the evidence, basically because there is no evidence, is the claim that Hamas weaponized rape on October 7th. However horrendous things happened on October 7th, you did not need to die on the hill of mass rape. They chose that hill to die on. There's no evidence that even one rape occurred on October 7th." Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

96,362 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Hasan Piker attempts to convince Norm Finkelstein that Israel tying itself to Judaism makes it harder to combat anti-Semitism Norm Finkelstein argues back that anti-Semitism is defined as an "irrational" hatred of Jews, but that the resentment is rational. Hasan argues that no people are monolithic, and the scapegoating of Jews is a common tactic. That people understand that when Tucker Carlson says America has "demographic concerns", that is white supremacy. He says that if Jews were monolithic there would not be such a generational divide on Zionism and billions spent to maintain its indoctrination. Finkelstein says he would not tell someone who has experienced the Holocaust that they should not hate Germans. And that he would not argue with a Palestinian who feels the same way about Jews. Norm cites that 95% of Israeli citizens agree with the force used against Gaza, and that its citizen army that represents its population carried out mass starvation as a method of war. Hasan Piker says he agrees with the facts, but he has a more optimistic perspective in terms of changing people's minds on conflating Judaism with Zionism.
14:05

Hasan Piker attempts to convince Norm Finkelstein that Israel tying itself to Judaism makes it harder to combat anti-Semitism Norm Finkelstein argues back that anti-Semitism is defined as an "irrational" hatred of Jews, but that the resentment is rational. Hasan argues that no people are monolithic, and the scapegoating of Jews is a common tactic. That people understand that when Tucker Carlson says America has "demographic concerns", that is white supremacy. He says that if Jews were monolithic there would not be such a generational divide on Zionism and billions spent to maintain its indoctrination. Finkelstein says he would not tell someone who has experienced the Holocaust that they should not hate Germans. And that he would not argue with a Palestinian who feels the same way about Jews. Norm cites that 95% of Israeli citizens agree with the force used against Gaza, and that its citizen army that represents its population carried out mass starvation as a method of war. Hasan Piker says he agrees with the facts, but he has a more optimistic perspective in terms of changing people's minds on conflating Judaism with Zionism.

Popstonox

1,906,734 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

John Mearsheimer on October 7: “It’s consistent with international law for Hamas to want to break out of the concentration camp and engage with Israeli military forces in combat, which means they’re going to kill some of them. So the fact that they killed Israeli soldiers is not a case of murder. Now, there were clearly Israeli civilians who were murdered as well, but I would be willing to bet, in the final analysis, however, that Hamas did not murder many of those Israeli civilians. But be that as it may, whoever murdered those civilians committed a war crime. But I think most of the Israelis who were killed were either soldiers, who were legitimate targets, or they were civilians who were killed by the Israeli forces. I think you cannot underestimate how many Israelis were killed when all that [Israeli] firepower was brought to bear. And if you look at the pictures and you listen to what happened, it’s clear that those Apache helicopters really wreaked havoc on everything that was down on the ground, and of course that included Israeli civilians. [...] What’s also quite stunning about this whole issue is that no one talks about why there was a breakout. Nobody talks about the fact that this was a concentration camp and what was being done to the Palestinians was abhorrent. And of course there was going to be a breakout from that concentration camp at some point. [...] This is not to excuse the murder of civilians that took place at the hands of Palestinians, but the more you look in detail about what happened, the clearer it becomes that Israel bears a great deal of the responsibility for what happened that day”. Full interview on the Katie Halper Show: Katie Halper
3:28

John Mearsheimer on October 7: “It’s consistent with international law for Hamas to want to break out of the concentration camp and engage with Israeli military forces in combat, which means they’re going to kill some of them. So the fact that they killed Israeli soldiers is not a case of murder. Now, there were clearly Israeli civilians who were murdered as well, but I would be willing to bet, in the final analysis, however, that Hamas did not murder many of those Israeli civilians. But be that as it may, whoever murdered those civilians committed a war crime. But I think most of the Israelis who were killed were either soldiers, who were legitimate targets, or they were civilians who were killed by the Israeli forces. I think you cannot underestimate how many Israelis were killed when all that [Israeli] firepower was brought to bear. And if you look at the pictures and you listen to what happened, it’s clear that those Apache helicopters really wreaked havoc on everything that was down on the ground, and of course that included Israeli civilians. [...] What’s also quite stunning about this whole issue is that no one talks about why there was a breakout. Nobody talks about the fact that this was a concentration camp and what was being done to the Palestinians was abhorrent. And of course there was going to be a breakout from that concentration camp at some point. [...] This is not to excuse the murder of civilians that took place at the hands of Palestinians, but the more you look in detail about what happened, the clearer it becomes that Israel bears a great deal of the responsibility for what happened that day”. Full interview on the Katie Halper Show: Katie Halper

Thomas Fazi

385,280 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

“Why Dave Smith and the “Anti-War Comics” Can’t Celebrate the End of the War” Watching Dave Smith flail away like a blind hitter going up against prime Pedro is lovely. He can’t admit the end to this war is good because Israel won yet another war THAT THEY DID NOT START… just like EVERY OTHER WAR IN ISRAEL’S HISTORY! Israel winning wars it did not start destroys Dave’s ENTIRE ideology. And this one is the coup de grace. Israel did not start this war. This war started on October 7th—on the holiday of Simchat Torah—with Palestinians committing genocide against Israelis and Israel. There is no better moral justification for engaging in war than responding to an act of genocide committed against your people. Yet, instead of responding in kind, Israel responded with the most moral war anybody has even seen. Ask John Spencer. The civilian to combatant death ratio is the best in history. And that was with Israel playing it on hardcore mode thanks to Yahya Sinwar planning the most diabolical of defenses: Have his terrorists infiltrate every facet of Gaza, utilize hospitals as command centers, use schools from which to shoot rockets, and store weapons caches underneath the bedrooms of children… all while denying Palestinians to use the protective bunkers and tunnel systems—larger than the London Tube system—instead ensuring only his terrorists could live there. Yahya Sinwar’s plan was to sacrifice all of the Palestinians… and Israel refused to comply. Rather, Israel insisted on two demands and never relented: (1) Return ALL hostages and (2) disband the terrorist entity RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GENOCIDE THAT STARTED THE WAR. Dave Smith can’t celebrate that. He can’t celebrate the return of the hostages. He can’t celebrate the end of hostilities… because he’s a sick, deranged, psychotic individual who would rather grasp onto his pathetic dystopian world view like a baby onto a bottle rather than confront the reality of this war. This war could’ve ended on October 8th. But Yahya Sinwar and the Palestinians craved this war. They DEMANDED it… and they got it… and they lost it. And that’s why Dave Smith can’t celebrate the end of this war. What a callous, cold-hearted *achem* comic
3:00

“Why Dave Smith and the “Anti-War Comics” Can’t Celebrate the End of the War” Watching Dave Smith flail away like a blind hitter going up against prime Pedro is lovely. He can’t admit the end to this war is good because Israel won yet another war THAT THEY DID NOT START… just like EVERY OTHER WAR IN ISRAEL’S HISTORY! Israel winning wars it did not start destroys Dave’s ENTIRE ideology. And this one is the coup de grace. Israel did not start this war. This war started on October 7th—on the holiday of Simchat Torah—with Palestinians committing genocide against Israelis and Israel. There is no better moral justification for engaging in war than responding to an act of genocide committed against your people. Yet, instead of responding in kind, Israel responded with the most moral war anybody has even seen. Ask John Spencer. The civilian to combatant death ratio is the best in history. And that was with Israel playing it on hardcore mode thanks to Yahya Sinwar planning the most diabolical of defenses: Have his terrorists infiltrate every facet of Gaza, utilize hospitals as command centers, use schools from which to shoot rockets, and store weapons caches underneath the bedrooms of children… all while denying Palestinians to use the protective bunkers and tunnel systems—larger than the London Tube system—instead ensuring only his terrorists could live there. Yahya Sinwar’s plan was to sacrifice all of the Palestinians… and Israel refused to comply. Rather, Israel insisted on two demands and never relented: (1) Return ALL hostages and (2) disband the terrorist entity RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GENOCIDE THAT STARTED THE WAR. Dave Smith can’t celebrate that. He can’t celebrate the return of the hostages. He can’t celebrate the end of hostilities… because he’s a sick, deranged, psychotic individual who would rather grasp onto his pathetic dystopian world view like a baby onto a bottle rather than confront the reality of this war. This war could’ve ended on October 8th. But Yahya Sinwar and the Palestinians craved this war. They DEMANDED it… and they got it… and they lost it. And that’s why Dave Smith can’t celebrate the end of this war. What a callous, cold-hearted *achem* comic

Jake Donnelly

37,458 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🧵1/ I’m back from a short trip on a social network with photographs and videos from Gaza, with some brief personal conclusions. First, it is quite clear that there are those in Gaza who know how to make extensive use of the networks and social media for the purposes of emotional extortion and also false propaganda, exactly like they live streamed the October 7 massacre and somehow turned it into “justified resistance”, they use quite a few Western buzzwords such as “genocide”, “occupation”, “oppression” and “Zionism”- and this is the simplest way to distinguish between Hamas propaganda posts and authentic people in Gaza, whom I’ve known all my life, who use much simpler words and not this indoctrinated manipulation bullshit. I was looking for THESE authentic people - the real voices. And I think I found a few. So first of all, what do I think there is NOT happening in Gaza? There is no genocide and no famine. Yes, there is quite a lot of suffering, shortages in some places and lack of decent shelter etc. And there’s a lot of cynical exploitation of it for propaganda purposes. I’m saying it because you can see children are getting payed for it, you can see the absolute control of distribution and you can see how basic needs and the way out is blocked with money- Israel is not taking money for any of it, the West is sending free aid, so the money is demanded by those who want to control the suffering and use it. You should know, that before the war - there was already quite a lot of very poor population in Gaza, but now the economic difficulty has greatly increased for two main reasons: one, the war damaged many sources of livelihood and the second - a major source of livelihood was working in Israel and this option was closed for a long time now, since October 7, and is now much less operational. So in fact the main source of income is donations and funding from Hamas for control purposes of course. This is how, among other things, Hamas uses the population to "work for them", and also to smile or cry for the cameras on demand. Now on the issue of claimed famine- famine is when there’s NO food and water, enough for the population. As I said, my personal conclusion is that there is no shortage of food and water in Gaza at all. The problem is that the food is not distributed equally, it is controlled by those who are powerful (usually Hamas operatives) and then sold at high costs to the population without them having sources of livelihood. Food that should be distributed for #free is actually sold at a high price, the shelter tents are also paid for and the exit from Gaza is particularly expensive (5000$ that are paid to the transporters). There are quite a few who refer to Gaza as a "prison" but Gaza is not a prison, Hamas has simply created a situation where it is very expensive to leave it - and thus the poor and the new poor are completely dependent on Hamas and other clans (Hamulas) in everything to do with food, shelter and exit, and they play with them as pawns. If Gaza is a prison - then it’s because Hamas are imprisoning it. All the suffering in Gaza started because of #Hamas it continues and increases because of #Hamas, but the main point is that #Hamas is also the one factor that can stop it. If Hamas surrendered unconditionally and released the Israeli hostages, as done in any war in which you are forced to admit defeat - they would truly liberate Palestine. Remember- this is a war that #Hamas started, a war that on Oct. 7 was celebrated in the streets of Gaza. But #Hamas prefers to keep the Palestinians captive so that it can showcase suffering (which they create) and use it as a tool for financial donations, manipulation of the West and a messianic jihadist war that will never end for them. If the West doesn’t wake up to this ongoing manipulation- they will never help the Palestinians in Gaza or in general, and they will bring this jihadist chaos to their doorstep From Gaza >
0:40

🧵1/ I’m back from a short trip on a social network with photographs and videos from Gaza, with some brief personal conclusions. First, it is quite clear that there are those in Gaza who know how to make extensive use of the networks and social media for the purposes of emotional extortion and also false propaganda, exactly like they live streamed the October 7 massacre and somehow turned it into “justified resistance”, they use quite a few Western buzzwords such as “genocide”, “occupation”, “oppression” and “Zionism”- and this is the simplest way to distinguish between Hamas propaganda posts and authentic people in Gaza, whom I’ve known all my life, who use much simpler words and not this indoctrinated manipulation bullshit. I was looking for THESE authentic people - the real voices. And I think I found a few. So first of all, what do I think there is NOT happening in Gaza? There is no genocide and no famine. Yes, there is quite a lot of suffering, shortages in some places and lack of decent shelter etc. And there’s a lot of cynical exploitation of it for propaganda purposes. I’m saying it because you can see children are getting payed for it, you can see the absolute control of distribution and you can see how basic needs and the way out is blocked with money- Israel is not taking money for any of it, the West is sending free aid, so the money is demanded by those who want to control the suffering and use it. You should know, that before the war - there was already quite a lot of very poor population in Gaza, but now the economic difficulty has greatly increased for two main reasons: one, the war damaged many sources of livelihood and the second - a major source of livelihood was working in Israel and this option was closed for a long time now, since October 7, and is now much less operational. So in fact the main source of income is donations and funding from Hamas for control purposes of course. This is how, among other things, Hamas uses the population to "work for them", and also to smile or cry for the cameras on demand. Now on the issue of claimed famine- famine is when there’s NO food and water, enough for the population. As I said, my personal conclusion is that there is no shortage of food and water in Gaza at all. The problem is that the food is not distributed equally, it is controlled by those who are powerful (usually Hamas operatives) and then sold at high costs to the population without them having sources of livelihood. Food that should be distributed for #free is actually sold at a high price, the shelter tents are also paid for and the exit from Gaza is particularly expensive (5000$ that are paid to the transporters). There are quite a few who refer to Gaza as a "prison" but Gaza is not a prison, Hamas has simply created a situation where it is very expensive to leave it - and thus the poor and the new poor are completely dependent on Hamas and other clans (Hamulas) in everything to do with food, shelter and exit, and they play with them as pawns. If Gaza is a prison - then it’s because Hamas are imprisoning it. All the suffering in Gaza started because of #Hamas it continues and increases because of #Hamas, but the main point is that #Hamas is also the one factor that can stop it. If Hamas surrendered unconditionally and released the Israeli hostages, as done in any war in which you are forced to admit defeat - they would truly liberate Palestine. Remember- this is a war that #Hamas started, a war that on Oct. 7 was celebrated in the streets of Gaza. But #Hamas prefers to keep the Palestinians captive so that it can showcase suffering (which they create) and use it as a tool for financial donations, manipulation of the West and a messianic jihadist war that will never end for them. If the West doesn’t wake up to this ongoing manipulation- they will never help the Palestinians in Gaza or in general, and they will bring this jihadist chaos to their doorstep From Gaza >

Gal G., Adv 🇮🇱

2,695,728 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEACH KEY QUOTES: - We mourn the martyrs of the Al-Qassam Brigades, the Islamic Resistance, the Al-Quds Brigades, and the civilian martyrs in Lebanon. - The battle of Al-Aqsa Flood has become extended on more than one front and in more than one arena - Resources are already committed to multiple fronts and various conflicts. - The Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood is fully legitimate, both humanly and morally - If we want to search for a battle with complete legitimacy, there is no battle like the fight with the Zionists - If we look for a war from the side of the moral, religius and humanitarian level, this is not something we have or see against the Zionist regim. This is the only war that deserves to be faught - We will not find a battle as fully legitimate from a humanitarian, moral and religious standpoint as the battle of fighting the Zionists. - Our real strength is in this believe in this resistance and this religion and all the commitment we have to this cause from our population - The battle with the Zionists is beyond doubt on both the moral and legal levels - We see how people get out of the rubbles and clearly showing their commitement to the resistance and this is our greatest strength - All hail to the legendary people of Gaza for their steadfastness and struggle - Greetings to the legendary people that have no equal in the world, to the people of Gaza and the people of Gaza. - Today I will focus on what happened, to explain it and tell about our responsibilities in Hezbullah. (SPEECH ONGOING NOW - WE WILL POST MORE QUOTES IN NEXT TWEET)
0:30

🚨 HEZBOLLAH LEADER SPEACH KEY QUOTES: - We mourn the martyrs of the Al-Qassam Brigades, the Islamic Resistance, the Al-Quds Brigades, and the civilian martyrs in Lebanon. - The battle of Al-Aqsa Flood has become extended on more than one front and in more than one arena - Resources are already committed to multiple fronts and various conflicts. - The Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood is fully legitimate, both humanly and morally - If we want to search for a battle with complete legitimacy, there is no battle like the fight with the Zionists - If we look for a war from the side of the moral, religius and humanitarian level, this is not something we have or see against the Zionist regim. This is the only war that deserves to be faught - We will not find a battle as fully legitimate from a humanitarian, moral and religious standpoint as the battle of fighting the Zionists. - Our real strength is in this believe in this resistance and this religion and all the commitment we have to this cause from our population - The battle with the Zionists is beyond doubt on both the moral and legal levels - We see how people get out of the rubbles and clearly showing their commitement to the resistance and this is our greatest strength - All hail to the legendary people of Gaza for their steadfastness and struggle - Greetings to the legendary people that have no equal in the world, to the people of Gaza and the people of Gaza. - Today I will focus on what happened, to explain it and tell about our responsibilities in Hezbullah. (SPEECH ONGOING NOW - WE WILL POST MORE QUOTES IN NEXT TWEET)

Mario Nawfal

2,220,423 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Ambassador Chas Freeman: Israel Is Worse Than Nazis It’s very clear what Israel wants. It’s made no secret that it wants to depopulate Gaza by whatever means it can, by starving people into leaving, expelling them, or killing them all. And there’s no question that it meets the definition of genocide. They have the intent to destroy an entire people. They have the ability and they are, in fact, carrying out an operation intended to do so. I think it’s also quite clear why Hamas did what it did. This was in the nature of a jailbreak from the world’s largest concentration camp. And having been treated like animals they behaved like animals. What they did was horrifying, it was inexcusable, but it was understandable. The Israeli reaction has been vastly disproportionate and that is Israel’s custom. It tries to react disproportionately in order to intimidate and deter anyone from attacking it. That is not new but what is new are the genocidal statements and proposed emptying of Gaza. 60% of the buildings in Northern Gaza have been destroyed and we know that over 12,000 Palestinians have been murdered by one means or another. Israel has destroyed most of the hospitals in Gaza. It now seems to be working on the schools. So it is totally ruthless and the whole thing is particularly macabre because it is such a vivid reminder of the Warsaw Ghetto, a very parallel situation in which driven beyond any ability to tolerate what was being done to them, the Jewish inhabitants of the Warsaw Ghetto rose against Nazi Germany and the Nazis exterminated them all and leveled the ghetto. One would think that the survivors of that Holocaust and the larger Holocaust in Europe would not wish to repeat a holocaust against another people but evidently, that is expecting too much of human nature. It now appears that much of the killing at the music festival was actually done by Israeli forces who fired indiscriminately at both the Hamas warriors and the milling crowds at the festival. Similarly, some of the major damage in the kibbutzim and the murders of the settlers there were done not by Hamas but by Israeli forces firing tank bullets into houses and hellfire missiles into cars and so forth. So this was a dreadful beginning to what has turned out to be an absolutely nauseating months and a half of slaughter, not finished. The United States has the ability to stop this by halting armed supplies to Israel but does not do that, opposes a ceasefire in support of Mr. Netanyahu’s revenge against the Palestinians, and Mr. Netanyahu, I would remind you, is on record many years ago as expressing hope for a war in which Israel could expel all the Arabs in its midst and seems to be taking advantage of this to do that hoping, I suppose, that his reputation which has been greatly damaged by charges of corruption and by his suspension of judicial independence in Israel, can somehow be redeemed by this act of revenge. Where we are is a very bad place. What Israel is reporting is extraordinarily crude propaganda, some of it obviously, utterly false, and they’ve been caught. Even some of the mainstream media are beginning to report that the Israeli Defense Forces are lying about a huge number of things. Younger people, generally in the West, certainly in my own country the United States, are far more inclined to be sympathetic to the Palestinians than they ever were before. It’s not that they dislike Israelis but now confronted with with graphic images of horror, the murder of 12,000 [Palestinians], they’re not dispassionate. Not only are they demonstrating in all of the world’s capitals for a ceasefire which their governments declined to support for the most part, but social media is now overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian as opposed to pro-Israeli. But I think the Palestinians, generally, have been motivated to remind the world that they exist. That their problems can’t be set aside. The Israeli government, with the connivance of the Biden Administration, and before that the Trump Administration, was making an effort to set the Palestinian issue aside in order to produce Arab-Israeli normalization. And the Palestinians set out with this raid into Israel to demonstrate that that is impossible, that the only way that you can have peace in Palestine is with a two-state solution. And oddly enough, although Hamas, of course, started as a movement funded in part by the Israelis — Mr. Netanyahu has openly admitted that he corroborated with Qatar to fund Hamas in Gaza in order to divide the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza — I think Hamas seized the moment to provoke Israel into doing exactly what Israel has predictively done in order to make it clear to the world that you have to have a two-state solution which had become a talking point. There was no reality to it at all. There had been no peace process for twenty-some years. Now there must be. People have recognized that the one-state solution — which many favored, meaning a purely democratic one-man-one-vote arrangement in Palestine in which inevitably the Jewish population given its higher level of culture, civilization, and finance, would have called most of the shots — is off the table. After all the hatred that has been demonstrated on both sides, coexistence in one state is obviously impossible in Palestine. Two states, however, would give the Palestinians a stake in peace. They have no stake in peace at the moment. They’re like a rabbit being swallowed by some kind of boa constrictor. As time goes on they go farther and farther down the throat of the snake and they’re crying out, and they were doing so at a pitch that, apparently, no one internationally could hear. And now their cause has been dramatized. We can’t have a resolution of what is going on now that takes the form of another expulsion of Palestinians, more tolerance of massacres, the condoning of genocide... and I think those in the West, including President Biden, who has been prepared to give Israel a pass on these issues, are beginning to pay heavily in terms of their political prestige in their domestic politics. Settler colonialism invariably leads to some attempt at genocide. That was the case in the United States, Canada, and Australia. It wasn’t the case in New Zealand because the Māori were too tough. It wasn’t the case in South Africa because the Zulus, and other South African blacks, were too tough. It wasn’t the case in Kenya because, eventually, black Kenyans rose up in the Mau Mau movement, which was itself a horror, but it did result in a separation from the colonial rule of the British. The same thing could happen. Now the difficulty of all this is obvious in terms of the fact that you’ve got an Israeli cabinet that is the most determined, genocidal cabinet the world has ever seen, and I don’t excuse the Nazi cabinets from that comparison. The overt statements of genocidal intent are unmistakable. There’s no effort, as the Germans did make, to conceal what is in store for the Palestinians. There’s no fake camp for Jews like the one the Nazis set up to bring the Swiss Red Cross in to show how wonderful they were treating the people they had taken away from their homes. No effort whatsoever of that sort, just bombing and strafing and murder on the ground. Israel appears to be paying quite a heavy price for that in terms of combat losses, but, of course, is not reporting accurately what is happening.
12:10

Ambassador Chas Freeman: Israel Is Worse Than Nazis It’s very clear what Israel wants. It’s made no secret that it wants to depopulate Gaza by whatever means it can, by starving people into leaving, expelling them, or killing them all. And there’s no question that it meets the definition of genocide. They have the intent to destroy an entire people. They have the ability and they are, in fact, carrying out an operation intended to do so. I think it’s also quite clear why Hamas did what it did. This was in the nature of a jailbreak from the world’s largest concentration camp. And having been treated like animals they behaved like animals. What they did was horrifying, it was inexcusable, but it was understandable. The Israeli reaction has been vastly disproportionate and that is Israel’s custom. It tries to react disproportionately in order to intimidate and deter anyone from attacking it. That is not new but what is new are the genocidal statements and proposed emptying of Gaza. 60% of the buildings in Northern Gaza have been destroyed and we know that over 12,000 Palestinians have been murdered by one means or another. Israel has destroyed most of the hospitals in Gaza. It now seems to be working on the schools. So it is totally ruthless and the whole thing is particularly macabre because it is such a vivid reminder of the Warsaw Ghetto, a very parallel situation in which driven beyond any ability to tolerate what was being done to them, the Jewish inhabitants of the Warsaw Ghetto rose against Nazi Germany and the Nazis exterminated them all and leveled the ghetto. One would think that the survivors of that Holocaust and the larger Holocaust in Europe would not wish to repeat a holocaust against another people but evidently, that is expecting too much of human nature. It now appears that much of the killing at the music festival was actually done by Israeli forces who fired indiscriminately at both the Hamas warriors and the milling crowds at the festival. Similarly, some of the major damage in the kibbutzim and the murders of the settlers there were done not by Hamas but by Israeli forces firing tank bullets into houses and hellfire missiles into cars and so forth. So this was a dreadful beginning to what has turned out to be an absolutely nauseating months and a half of slaughter, not finished. The United States has the ability to stop this by halting armed supplies to Israel but does not do that, opposes a ceasefire in support of Mr. Netanyahu’s revenge against the Palestinians, and Mr. Netanyahu, I would remind you, is on record many years ago as expressing hope for a war in which Israel could expel all the Arabs in its midst and seems to be taking advantage of this to do that hoping, I suppose, that his reputation which has been greatly damaged by charges of corruption and by his suspension of judicial independence in Israel, can somehow be redeemed by this act of revenge. Where we are is a very bad place. What Israel is reporting is extraordinarily crude propaganda, some of it obviously, utterly false, and they’ve been caught. Even some of the mainstream media are beginning to report that the Israeli Defense Forces are lying about a huge number of things. Younger people, generally in the West, certainly in my own country the United States, are far more inclined to be sympathetic to the Palestinians than they ever were before. It’s not that they dislike Israelis but now confronted with with graphic images of horror, the murder of 12,000 [Palestinians], they’re not dispassionate. Not only are they demonstrating in all of the world’s capitals for a ceasefire which their governments declined to support for the most part, but social media is now overwhelmingly pro-Palestinian as opposed to pro-Israeli. But I think the Palestinians, generally, have been motivated to remind the world that they exist. That their problems can’t be set aside. The Israeli government, with the connivance of the Biden Administration, and before that the Trump Administration, was making an effort to set the Palestinian issue aside in order to produce Arab-Israeli normalization. And the Palestinians set out with this raid into Israel to demonstrate that that is impossible, that the only way that you can have peace in Palestine is with a two-state solution. And oddly enough, although Hamas, of course, started as a movement funded in part by the Israelis — Mr. Netanyahu has openly admitted that he corroborated with Qatar to fund Hamas in Gaza in order to divide the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza — I think Hamas seized the moment to provoke Israel into doing exactly what Israel has predictively done in order to make it clear to the world that you have to have a two-state solution which had become a talking point. There was no reality to it at all. There had been no peace process for twenty-some years. Now there must be. People have recognized that the one-state solution — which many favored, meaning a purely democratic one-man-one-vote arrangement in Palestine in which inevitably the Jewish population given its higher level of culture, civilization, and finance, would have called most of the shots — is off the table. After all the hatred that has been demonstrated on both sides, coexistence in one state is obviously impossible in Palestine. Two states, however, would give the Palestinians a stake in peace. They have no stake in peace at the moment. They’re like a rabbit being swallowed by some kind of boa constrictor. As time goes on they go farther and farther down the throat of the snake and they’re crying out, and they were doing so at a pitch that, apparently, no one internationally could hear. And now their cause has been dramatized. We can’t have a resolution of what is going on now that takes the form of another expulsion of Palestinians, more tolerance of massacres, the condoning of genocide... and I think those in the West, including President Biden, who has been prepared to give Israel a pass on these issues, are beginning to pay heavily in terms of their political prestige in their domestic politics. Settler colonialism invariably leads to some attempt at genocide. That was the case in the United States, Canada, and Australia. It wasn’t the case in New Zealand because the Māori were too tough. It wasn’t the case in South Africa because the Zulus, and other South African blacks, were too tough. It wasn’t the case in Kenya because, eventually, black Kenyans rose up in the Mau Mau movement, which was itself a horror, but it did result in a separation from the colonial rule of the British. The same thing could happen. Now the difficulty of all this is obvious in terms of the fact that you’ve got an Israeli cabinet that is the most determined, genocidal cabinet the world has ever seen, and I don’t excuse the Nazi cabinets from that comparison. The overt statements of genocidal intent are unmistakable. There’s no effort, as the Germans did make, to conceal what is in store for the Palestinians. There’s no fake camp for Jews like the one the Nazis set up to bring the Swiss Red Cross in to show how wonderful they were treating the people they had taken away from their homes. No effort whatsoever of that sort, just bombing and strafing and murder on the ground. Israel appears to be paying quite a heavy price for that in terms of combat losses, but, of course, is not reporting accurately what is happening.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

22,337 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.
1:27

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🇮🇱🇵🇸 "GAZA WAS BASICALLY AN INFERNO LONG BEFORE OCTOBER 7" Norman Finkelstein says we can’t know exactly what was in Hamas leaders’ heads before October 7, but he tries to imagine the mindset of the young fighters who broke out of Gaza that day. He describes Gaza as a place he calls a “concentration camp”: tiny, overcrowded, cut off by an Israeli blockade, with extreme youth unemployment and almost no future. In his telling, these young men grew up pacing the same fenced, in strip of land, feeling like their lives were already over, and when they saw the region moving toward deals like the Abraham Accords, they believed Gaza was about to be sealed off forever, which he suggests helped drive the decision to launch the attack. "I think it requires great powers of imagination, but without going through all the details, which I suspect many of your listeners know, Gaza was basically an inferno. Under the Israeli occupation it was already being described by Israel’s head of its National Security Council, Giora Eiland, as a, quote, “huge concentration camp.” His words. By October 2023, Gaza was being described by The Economist as a rubbish heap. Others described it as a human rubbish heap. Others described it as a toxic dump. The young men, the age cohort that burst the gates of Gaza on October 7th had been born into a concentration camp. They languished in the concentration camp, and it was almost certain they were going to die in that concentration camp. It looked like the final nail in the coffin of Gaza was going to be hammered in when Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords. That was the expectation in 2023: that their fate was sealed. Gaza was over." Norman Finkelstein
4:46

🇮🇱🇵🇸 "GAZA WAS BASICALLY AN INFERNO LONG BEFORE OCTOBER 7" Norman Finkelstein says we can’t know exactly what was in Hamas leaders’ heads before October 7, but he tries to imagine the mindset of the young fighters who broke out of Gaza that day. He describes Gaza as a place he calls a “concentration camp”: tiny, overcrowded, cut off by an Israeli blockade, with extreme youth unemployment and almost no future. In his telling, these young men grew up pacing the same fenced, in strip of land, feeling like their lives were already over, and when they saw the region moving toward deals like the Abraham Accords, they believed Gaza was about to be sealed off forever, which he suggests helped drive the decision to launch the attack. "I think it requires great powers of imagination, but without going through all the details, which I suspect many of your listeners know, Gaza was basically an inferno. Under the Israeli occupation it was already being described by Israel’s head of its National Security Council, Giora Eiland, as a, quote, “huge concentration camp.” His words. By October 2023, Gaza was being described by The Economist as a rubbish heap. Others described it as a human rubbish heap. Others described it as a toxic dump. The young men, the age cohort that burst the gates of Gaza on October 7th had been born into a concentration camp. They languished in the concentration camp, and it was almost certain they were going to die in that concentration camp. It looked like the final nail in the coffin of Gaza was going to be hammered in when Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords. That was the expectation in 2023: that their fate was sealed. Gaza was over." Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

16,122 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein
2:47

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

13,901 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

‘Rothschild’ is trending on X. It’s time to end the Federal Reserve SHOCKING history you were never told: Benjamin Franklin on the REAL cause of the War of Independence. It was the Rothschild banking takeover of their money in England “What was the real reason for the Revolutionary War? Very interesting. Not what you were taught in school. Real reason for the Revolutionary War. Here's a few quotes from William Manley German in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913. The Rothschild's Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money. Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothschild's Bank of England to get money. Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date, the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed. Franklin later claimed this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said the colonies, you know, we heard it was the Tea Act, right? You know, things like tea tax and stuff. The colonies would gladly have, this is according to Benjamin Franklin, the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschilds Bank took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment, dissatisfaction, and debt. And that is the real cause, folks, of the war. Next thing that I want to talk about real quick is something called the definitive trading. We heard this nasty rumor that we won the Revolutionary War. Ain't true! We did not win it. The last battle that was fought, Cornwallis, surrendered the battle, not the war. Proof? About one year ago, this document, — It's called the definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States signed at Paris 3 September 1783. It had never been in this country before that. This is what really, really, really happened. You think there was a war? Nah, read this. Listen to this. And again I've got this stuff available for anybody who wants to look at it later. Here's an introduction. It having pleased the divine providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent prince. This is somebody that lost the battle as the most potent prince. I don't think so. George III, by the grace of God, listen to this, here's his titles. King of Great Britain. France. Who did we borrow the money from that helped us win the war, we thought? France? Now we owe that money to the King of England? Interesting. Ireland, defender of the faith, youth of Brunswick and Lunenburg, archtreasurer and prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire, treasurer of the Catholic Church, positions all over, etc. And it goes on and on and on and on and on. What happens is we start looking then at who are the parties to the treaty. We find out the parties to the treaty is this guy named John Adams, comma, Esquire. Does anybody know where you go get an Esquire title? England. I don't think we gave them out. Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. John Jay, Esquire. These were all people who were titled nobility in England, who were negotiating this treaty. And do you know what the treaty really said? The treaty really said, it's agreed that everything that England and the people of England and the King and whoever else owned and any obligations that existed before this treaty are still law. The King still owns it. The King still owed all the money. Nothing changed except we could govern ourselves theoretically as long as we paid the rent” There is ouch more information in this video and everyone should be aware of our real history.
5:11

‘Rothschild’ is trending on X. It’s time to end the Federal Reserve SHOCKING history you were never told: Benjamin Franklin on the REAL cause of the War of Independence. It was the Rothschild banking takeover of their money in England “What was the real reason for the Revolutionary War? Very interesting. Not what you were taught in school. Real reason for the Revolutionary War. Here's a few quotes from William Manley German in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913. The Rothschild's Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money. Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothschild's Bank of England to get money. Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date, the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed. Franklin later claimed this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said the colonies, you know, we heard it was the Tea Act, right? You know, things like tea tax and stuff. The colonies would gladly have, this is according to Benjamin Franklin, the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschilds Bank took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment, dissatisfaction, and debt. And that is the real cause, folks, of the war. Next thing that I want to talk about real quick is something called the definitive trading. We heard this nasty rumor that we won the Revolutionary War. Ain't true! We did not win it. The last battle that was fought, Cornwallis, surrendered the battle, not the war. Proof? About one year ago, this document, — It's called the definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States signed at Paris 3 September 1783. It had never been in this country before that. This is what really, really, really happened. You think there was a war? Nah, read this. Listen to this. And again I've got this stuff available for anybody who wants to look at it later. Here's an introduction. It having pleased the divine providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent prince. This is somebody that lost the battle as the most potent prince. I don't think so. George III, by the grace of God, listen to this, here's his titles. King of Great Britain. France. Who did we borrow the money from that helped us win the war, we thought? France? Now we owe that money to the King of England? Interesting. Ireland, defender of the faith, youth of Brunswick and Lunenburg, archtreasurer and prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire, treasurer of the Catholic Church, positions all over, etc. And it goes on and on and on and on and on. What happens is we start looking then at who are the parties to the treaty. We find out the parties to the treaty is this guy named John Adams, comma, Esquire. Does anybody know where you go get an Esquire title? England. I don't think we gave them out. Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. John Jay, Esquire. These were all people who were titled nobility in England, who were negotiating this treaty. And do you know what the treaty really said? The treaty really said, it's agreed that everything that England and the people of England and the King and whoever else owned and any obligations that existed before this treaty are still law. The King still owns it. The King still owed all the money. Nothing changed except we could govern ourselves theoretically as long as we paid the rent” There is ouch more information in this video and everyone should be aware of our real history.

Wall Street Apes

259,631 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic nation, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic nation. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic nation. A nation that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic nation, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic nation will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic nation will replace it. The fact that the idea of ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Qur'an. Quran 2.128 "Our Lord, and make us Muslims [in submission] to You and from our descendants a Muslim nation [in submission] to You. And show us our rites and accept our repentance. Indeed, You are the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." Source: MEMRI TV Source: Online Platforms - "Al-Aqsa Call on YouTube"Al-Aqsa Mosque Address By Palestinian Islamic Scholar Issam Amira: Palestinian Nationalism Is A 'Heretical Innovation' Created By The Sykes-Picot Agreement To Prevent The Rise Of Islam, Which Is The Only Valid Identity, Political System. Link to the entire video:
0:24

"Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic nation, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic nation. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic nation. A nation that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic nation, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic nation will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic nation will replace it. The fact that the idea of ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Qur'an. Quran 2.128 "Our Lord, and make us Muslims [in submission] to You and from our descendants a Muslim nation [in submission] to You. And show us our rites and accept our repentance. Indeed, You are the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." Source: MEMRI TV Source: Online Platforms - "Al-Aqsa Call on YouTube"Al-Aqsa Mosque Address By Palestinian Islamic Scholar Issam Amira: Palestinian Nationalism Is A 'Heretical Innovation' Created By The Sykes-Picot Agreement To Prevent The Rise Of Islam, Which Is The Only Valid Identity, Political System. Link to the entire video:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

271,560 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"Tucker Carlson was the first one in the media, in the web world, who came out against the war against Iran...& that has to be acknowledged. The problem is his stock will now go through the roof, because he'll have the aura of a prophet...And the problem with prophets is that they come as a package -- a prophet is just next door to a guru. You then start to take it en masse. In what you just read to me, I thought it was complete nonsense." Norman Finkelstein Watch the full two hour conversation on YouTube‼️
2:36

"Tucker Carlson was the first one in the media, in the web world, who came out against the war against Iran...& that has to be acknowledged. The problem is his stock will now go through the roof, because he'll have the aura of a prophet...And the problem with prophets is that they come as a package -- a prophet is just next door to a guru. You then start to take it en masse. In what you just read to me, I thought it was complete nonsense." Norman Finkelstein Watch the full two hour conversation on YouTube‼️

Briahna Joy Gray

50,477 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

On the 78th anniversary of the Nakba, we remember that dispossession and exile are not mere footnotes of the past but living, ongoing realities. To speak of justice today is to name the catastrophe of 1948 and to recognise that no future can be built on forgetting. Freedom and equal rights for all, from the river to the sea, is the only vision worthy of the name. As we mark another Nakba anniversary, the genocide that started then is intensifying. What we witness in Gaza and across the occupied territories is not a war, not clash of equals, nor a tragic but inevitable conflict — it is the violent, relentless logic of white settler terra nullius colonialism, dressed in modern military hardware and sustained by western complicity. A people is being erased, deemed superfluous, their humanity denied so that their erasure may be justified. To commemorate the Nakba is to stand with the living against the coloniser’s lie that some lives are mere obstacles. It is to insist that remembrance must become resistance, and resistance is not only a prerequisite for liberty but also of existence.
1:46

On the 78th anniversary of the Nakba, we remember that dispossession and exile are not mere footnotes of the past but living, ongoing realities. To speak of justice today is to name the catastrophe of 1948 and to recognise that no future can be built on forgetting. Freedom and equal rights for all, from the river to the sea, is the only vision worthy of the name. As we mark another Nakba anniversary, the genocide that started then is intensifying. What we witness in Gaza and across the occupied territories is not a war, not clash of equals, nor a tragic but inevitable conflict — it is the violent, relentless logic of white settler terra nullius colonialism, dressed in modern military hardware and sustained by western complicity. A people is being erased, deemed superfluous, their humanity denied so that their erasure may be justified. To commemorate the Nakba is to stand with the living against the coloniser’s lie that some lives are mere obstacles. It is to insist that remembrance must become resistance, and resistance is not only a prerequisite for liberty but also of existence.

Yanis Varoufakis

25,754 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce