Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

In recent days Israel has placed a greater emphasis on striking industrial targets in Iran, with the most significant in recent memory being: - Khuzestan Steel Company, Ahvaz - Khuzestan Oxin Steel Company, Ahvaz - Mobarakeh Steel Complex, southwest of Isfahan - Mobarakeh Steel Power Plant (supplies energy to... the steel complex) - Powder Metallurgy Company, Neyshabur Industrial Town - Shahid Shafizadeh Industries Company, Alborz Industrial - Kheyr Abad Industrial Town, east of Arak, was just warned - Shamsabad Industrial Town, south of Eslamshahr - Nasirabad Industrial Town, southwest of Eslamshahr - Segzi Industrial Town, east of Isfahan The above list is just a sample of the industrial targets affected by strikes over the past 1-2 days. Many of these facilities are dual-use, and so too were the intentions of the Israeli strikes. Large-scale steel production complexes support construction, automotives, appliances, and pipe manufacturing. It's also critical for military vehicles and launch platforms. Specialized heavy steel plate rolling mills support energy transmission lines, pressure vessels, shipbuilding, and storage tanks. They have many military applications such as producing the hull sections of naval vessels, storage tanks for propellants, and steel plates for TELs and bunkers. Powder metallurgical plants produce machinery components, mining equipment, and specialized alloys. They can also be used to make precision components in guidance systems, warheads, or solid-propellant motors. The major industrial towns are made up of dozens of smaller factories or warehouses involved in metal fabrication, chemicals, plastics/polymers, construction materials, textiles, machinery assembly, bitumen processing, packaging, stone processing, and electronic goods. On one hand this attempt at crippling Iran's industrial base could destroy many of the raw materials necessary for future repairs/construction of military equipment and missile components. At the same time it would hamper Iran's domestic construction, automobile, appliance, piping, and petrochemical sectors. This would diminish Iran's export revenue, create shortages of basic materials, and worsen inflation and unemployment.show more

Theti Mapping

13,433 subscribers

15,343 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨🇺🇦🔥 Ukrainian long-range strikes reportedly reached Volgograd overnight, with FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles targeting the Volgogradpromproekt industrial facility. The company specializes in special chemicals, including organophosphorus compounds, flame retardants, resins and other industrial chemical components. Its products are used across several sectors of Russian industry, including military aviation, shipbuilding and other specialized industrial applications. 🔥 The significance lies in the target set: Ukraine is increasingly going after industrial nodes that support Russia’s broader military production base, not just frontline logistics or energy infrastructure. Strikes on specialized chemical suppliers can create downstream disruption across multiple defense sectors at once, making them potentially more consequential than the physical damage to a single facility might suggest.

🚨🇺🇦🔥 Ukrainian long-range strikes reportedly reached Volgograd overnight, with FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles targeting the Volgogradpromproekt industrial facility. The company specializes in special chemicals, including organophosphorus compounds, flame retardants, resins and other industrial chemical components. Its products are used across several sectors of Russian industry, including military aviation, shipbuilding and other specialized industrial applications. 🔥 The significance lies in the target set: Ukraine is increasingly going after industrial nodes that support Russia’s broader military production base, not just frontline logistics or energy infrastructure. Strikes on specialized chemical suppliers can create downstream disruption across multiple defense sectors at once, making them potentially more consequential than the physical damage to a single facility might suggest.

NSTRIKE

19,647 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announces that tomorrow Trump will implement 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and a 10% tariff on China. That means you can expect the prices of the following goods to go up. You can also expect the prices of goods in which these items are part of the supply chain of to go up. 🇨🇦 U.S. Imports from Canada - Crude Oil & Petroleum Products – Largest import, crucial for U.S. energy supply - Vehicles & Auto Parts – Canada is a major supplier for U.S. automakers - Lumber & Wood Products – Essential for construction and furniture - Machinery & Industrial Equipment – Includes turbines, engines, and heavy equipment - Aluminum & Steel – Used in manufacturing, construction, and defense - Natural Gas – Key for U.S. energy production - Electrical Equipment – Power distribution components, transformers - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Equipment – Includes vaccines, surgical tools - Food & Agricultural Products – Wheat, canola, seafood, dairy products - Aircraft & Aerospace Parts – Canada’s Bombardier is a major supplier 🇲🇽 U.S. Imports from Mexico - Vehicles & Auto Parts – A critical supply chain for U.S. carmakers - Computers & Electronics – Laptops, smartphones, semiconductors - Machinery & Manufacturing Equipment – Includes industrial tools and robotics - Medical Devices & Pharmaceuticals – Mexico is a key exporter of medical goods - Agricultural Products – Avocados, tomatoes, berries, peppers, and tequila - Oil & Petroleum Products – Fuel, refined oils - Clothing & Textiles – Apparel, footwear, and fabric materials - Appliances & Consumer Goods – Refrigerators, washing machines, and home goods - Beer & Alcoholic Beverages – Mexico is the top supplier of beer to the U.S. - Aerospace Components – Parts for planes and satellites 🇨🇳 U.S. Imports from China - Electronics & Computers – Smartphones, laptops, semiconductors, networking equipment - Machinery & Industrial Equipment – Manufacturing tools, robots, and heavy equipment - Furniture & Home Goods – Sofas, tables, decorations - Toys, Games & Sporting Equipment – The majority of U.S. toy imports come from China - Clothing & Footwear – Shoes, apparel, and textiles - Plastics & Rubber Products – Packaging, auto parts, medical supplies - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Equipment – Generic drugs, masks, syringes -Steel & Aluminum Products – Components for construction and manufacturing - Auto Parts – Batteries, electronics, interior components - Chemicals & Fertilizers – Essential for agriculture and industry

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announces that tomorrow Trump will implement 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and a 10% tariff on China. That means you can expect the prices of the following goods to go up. You can also expect the prices of goods in which these items are part of the supply chain of to go up. 🇨🇦 U.S. Imports from Canada - Crude Oil & Petroleum Products – Largest import, crucial for U.S. energy supply - Vehicles & Auto Parts – Canada is a major supplier for U.S. automakers - Lumber & Wood Products – Essential for construction and furniture - Machinery & Industrial Equipment – Includes turbines, engines, and heavy equipment - Aluminum & Steel – Used in manufacturing, construction, and defense - Natural Gas – Key for U.S. energy production - Electrical Equipment – Power distribution components, transformers - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Equipment – Includes vaccines, surgical tools - Food & Agricultural Products – Wheat, canola, seafood, dairy products - Aircraft & Aerospace Parts – Canada’s Bombardier is a major supplier 🇲🇽 U.S. Imports from Mexico - Vehicles & Auto Parts – A critical supply chain for U.S. carmakers - Computers & Electronics – Laptops, smartphones, semiconductors - Machinery & Manufacturing Equipment – Includes industrial tools and robotics - Medical Devices & Pharmaceuticals – Mexico is a key exporter of medical goods - Agricultural Products – Avocados, tomatoes, berries, peppers, and tequila - Oil & Petroleum Products – Fuel, refined oils - Clothing & Textiles – Apparel, footwear, and fabric materials - Appliances & Consumer Goods – Refrigerators, washing machines, and home goods - Beer & Alcoholic Beverages – Mexico is the top supplier of beer to the U.S. - Aerospace Components – Parts for planes and satellites 🇨🇳 U.S. Imports from China - Electronics & Computers – Smartphones, laptops, semiconductors, networking equipment - Machinery & Industrial Equipment – Manufacturing tools, robots, and heavy equipment - Furniture & Home Goods – Sofas, tables, decorations - Toys, Games & Sporting Equipment – The majority of U.S. toy imports come from China - Clothing & Footwear – Shoes, apparel, and textiles - Plastics & Rubber Products – Packaging, auto parts, medical supplies - Pharmaceuticals & Medical Equipment – Generic drugs, masks, syringes -Steel & Aluminum Products – Components for construction and manufacturing - Auto Parts – Batteries, electronics, interior components - Chemicals & Fertilizers – Essential for agriculture and industry

Ed Krassenstein

222,188 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This week on The Big 3, CPA economists Mihir Torsekar and Andrew Rechenberg sit down with Ben Carlson of SAFE's (SAFE) Center for Strategic Industrial Materials to examine China’s growing dominance in steel, aluminum, and copper—and what it means for America’s industrial future. The conversation centers on SAFE’s new report, "Strategic Surpluses: China’s Economic Warfare on Major Metals," which argues that China’s vast production capacity is not simply the result of market forces or planning mistakes. Instead, Carlson explains how Beijing has deliberately cultivated strategic surpluses across key industrial sectors, creating manufacturing capacity that can support economic objectives in peacetime and national security objectives during periods of conflict. The discussion explores the staggering scale of China’s metal production, the role of state support and industrial subsidies, and the consequences for American manufacturers. Carlson also explains why tariffs, while important, are often insufficient on their own. Through transshipment, tariff inversion, and complex global supply chains, subsidized Chinese inputs can still find their way into the U.S. market through finished products. Finally, the episode turns to solutions. What would a successful American industrial strategy actually look like? The answer goes beyond tariffs to include energy policy, infrastructure investment, permitting reform, recycling, and stronger rules of origin that align domestic demand with domestic production. For anyone interested in trade, manufacturing, national security, or industrial policy, this is an essential conversation about one of the defining economic challenges of our time. 🔊 Listen on Apple: 🔊 Listen on Spotify:

This week on The Big 3, CPA economists Mihir Torsekar and Andrew Rechenberg sit down with Ben Carlson of SAFE's (SAFE) Center for Strategic Industrial Materials to examine China’s growing dominance in steel, aluminum, and copper—and what it means for America’s industrial future. The conversation centers on SAFE’s new report, "Strategic Surpluses: China’s Economic Warfare on Major Metals," which argues that China’s vast production capacity is not simply the result of market forces or planning mistakes. Instead, Carlson explains how Beijing has deliberately cultivated strategic surpluses across key industrial sectors, creating manufacturing capacity that can support economic objectives in peacetime and national security objectives during periods of conflict. The discussion explores the staggering scale of China’s metal production, the role of state support and industrial subsidies, and the consequences for American manufacturers. Carlson also explains why tariffs, while important, are often insufficient on their own. Through transshipment, tariff inversion, and complex global supply chains, subsidized Chinese inputs can still find their way into the U.S. market through finished products. Finally, the episode turns to solutions. What would a successful American industrial strategy actually look like? The answer goes beyond tariffs to include energy policy, infrastructure investment, permitting reform, recycling, and stronger rules of origin that align domestic demand with domestic production. For anyone interested in trade, manufacturing, national security, or industrial policy, this is an essential conversation about one of the defining economic challenges of our time. 🔊 Listen on Apple: 🔊 Listen on Spotify:

The Coalition for a Prosperous America

139,253 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

In addition to this morning’s strikes against the Arak Nuclear Complex (IR-40) in Western Iran, the Israeli Air Force also struck dozens of other targets across Iran. Overnight, 40 fighter jets with the Israeli Air Force, at the precise intelligence direction of the Intelligence Directorate, struck dozens of military targets in Tehran and additional areas throughout Iran, using over 100 munitions, including a nuclear weapons development site in the area of Natanz as well as factories producing raw materials, components used in the assembly of ballistic missiles, and sites for the production of air-defense systems and missiles by the Iranian Armed Forces. Furthermore, strikes were also carried out against air-defense batteries, surface-to-surface missile storage sites, detection radar systems, and detection equipment, all used and operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as well as the Iranian Armed Forces.

In addition to this morning’s strikes against the Arak Nuclear Complex (IR-40) in Western Iran, the Israeli Air Force also struck dozens of other targets across Iran. Overnight, 40 fighter jets with the Israeli Air Force, at the precise intelligence direction of the Intelligence Directorate, struck dozens of military targets in Tehran and additional areas throughout Iran, using over 100 munitions, including a nuclear weapons development site in the area of Natanz as well as factories producing raw materials, components used in the assembly of ballistic missiles, and sites for the production of air-defense systems and missiles by the Iranian Armed Forces. Furthermore, strikes were also carried out against air-defense batteries, surface-to-surface missile storage sites, detection radar systems, and detection equipment, all used and operated by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as well as the Iranian Armed Forces.

OSINTdefender

387,407 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russia carried out one of the largest retaliatory strikes on Kiev — 7 major enterprises STRUCK Russia's MoD stated that in response to Kiev's terrorist attacks on civilian infrastructure, they launched a massive strike using long-range weapons against military, fuel and energy facilities in Kiev region The following targets were struck: ▫️RADIONICS LLC — electronics industry and components assembly company that produces guidance systems for the Flamingo long-range cruise missiles ▫️ATLON AVIA Research and Production Company LLC — electronic industry assembly plant which supplies the Ukrainian military with An-196 Lyutyi UAVs ▫️Antonov State Enterprise — aviation industry assembly plant which develops and produces military aircraft ▫️Kiev Radio Plant JSC, TRIMEN-UKRAINE LLC — leading enterprise in modernization of sighting systems for all types of tanks and infantry combat vehicles ▫️PV GROUP UKRAINE — Kiev-25 industrial enterprise which produces and stores software and hardware for the Lima electronic system, used for navigation ▫️MLP-CHAIKA — transport and logistics center, used for storage of long-range UAVs ▫️Grandterminal LLC — fuel and lubricants warehouse which supplies diesel fuel for the Ukrainian military ▫️Gas stations in Kiev and the Kiev region

‼️🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russia carried out one of the largest retaliatory strikes on Kiev — 7 major enterprises STRUCK Russia's MoD stated that in response to Kiev's terrorist attacks on civilian infrastructure, they launched a massive strike using long-range weapons against military, fuel and energy facilities in Kiev region The following targets were struck: ▫️RADIONICS LLC — electronics industry and components assembly company that produces guidance systems for the Flamingo long-range cruise missiles ▫️ATLON AVIA Research and Production Company LLC — electronic industry assembly plant which supplies the Ukrainian military with An-196 Lyutyi UAVs ▫️Antonov State Enterprise — aviation industry assembly plant which develops and produces military aircraft ▫️Kiev Radio Plant JSC, TRIMEN-UKRAINE LLC — leading enterprise in modernization of sighting systems for all types of tanks and infantry combat vehicles ▫️PV GROUP UKRAINE — Kiev-25 industrial enterprise which produces and stores software and hardware for the Lima electronic system, used for navigation ▫️MLP-CHAIKA — transport and logistics center, used for storage of long-range UAVs ▫️Grandterminal LLC — fuel and lubricants warehouse which supplies diesel fuel for the Ukrainian military ▫️Gas stations in Kiev and the Kiev region

Lord Bebo

195,480 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

America wants a nuclear-energy race with China. China is building the machines that build nuclear power plants. SANY has just rolled out the world’s first 250,000 tonne-metre ring-rail crane, designed specifically for large-scale nuclear construction. All-electric. Digitally controlled. Built for modular nuclear projects. And European and Japanese customers are already interested. This is the part Washington keeps fucking missing. Industrial competition is not won by announcing more reactors. You need the steel. The cranes. The machine tools. The components. The supply chains. The engineers. The factories capable of producing all of them at scale. In 2013, America covered the Chinese logo with an American flag. In 2026, it still cannot cover the industrial reality. And that is the real problem: America wants to race China in nuclear power. China is manufacturing the fucking racetrack.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

19,383 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Nigeria has agreed to a gas deal that moves it closer to reviving the Ajaokuta Steel Complex that hasn't produced any metal since being built half a century ago. The agreement with the Nigeria National Petroleum Co will provide Ajaokuta Steel Co. with as much as 50 million standard cubic feet of gas per day as feedstock for a power plant servicing the metals complex. The availability of gas has long been a key question raised by investors from many countries over the years. The steel plant and all its components are all powered by gas. The Ajaokuta plant was built by Soviet engineers in the late 70s. More than $8 billion has been sunk into the complex over the past five decades, and its yet to produce any steel. This industrial complex had the potential to transform Nigeria's industrial landscape, especially considering Nigeria's vast iron ore deposits. President Bola Tinubu has set a crude steel production target of 10 million tons annually by 2030. Though the furnace is not running, engineers at the facility have fabricated a modular blast furnace that's currently molding manhole covers, poles and rail tracks for a small section of the Nigerian market. The government has decided to pursue a partnership model under which private investors will finance and operate the facility for 10 to 15 years before transferring it back, while generating returns for the government. The approach mirrors the strategy adopted to revive Nigeria's long idle oil refineries.

Nigeria has agreed to a gas deal that moves it closer to reviving the Ajaokuta Steel Complex that hasn't produced any metal since being built half a century ago. The agreement with the Nigeria National Petroleum Co will provide Ajaokuta Steel Co. with as much as 50 million standard cubic feet of gas per day as feedstock for a power plant servicing the metals complex. The availability of gas has long been a key question raised by investors from many countries over the years. The steel plant and all its components are all powered by gas. The Ajaokuta plant was built by Soviet engineers in the late 70s. More than $8 billion has been sunk into the complex over the past five decades, and its yet to produce any steel. This industrial complex had the potential to transform Nigeria's industrial landscape, especially considering Nigeria's vast iron ore deposits. President Bola Tinubu has set a crude steel production target of 10 million tons annually by 2030. Though the furnace is not running, engineers at the facility have fabricated a modular blast furnace that's currently molding manhole covers, poles and rail tracks for a small section of the Nigerian market. The government has decided to pursue a partnership model under which private investors will finance and operate the facility for 10 to 15 years before transferring it back, while generating returns for the government. The approach mirrors the strategy adopted to revive Nigeria's long idle oil refineries.

Defense News Nigeria

41,375 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The attached video captures part of my submission during the maiden meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI). I emphasized that Uganda must invest not only in what we produce, but in how we produce it. Too often, our conversations focus on the final product, yet the machines, equipment and spare parts used to manufacture those products are largely imported. This keeps production costs high and limits our industrial independence. Uganda possesses many of the raw materials required to manufacture industrial machinery. If we invest in engineering, technology and machine-building, we can lower the cost of manufacturing, strengthen our industries, create high-value jobs and reduce our dependence on imports. Beyond meeting our own needs, Uganda has the potential to become a regional hub for industrial machinery, supplying equipment to markets across East and Central Africa. True industrialisation is not just about making more products it is about building the machines that make those products. That is where innovation creates lasting economic transformation.

The attached video captures part of my submission during the maiden meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI). I emphasized that Uganda must invest not only in what we produce, but in how we produce it. Too often, our conversations focus on the final product, yet the machines, equipment and spare parts used to manufacture those products are largely imported. This keeps production costs high and limits our industrial independence. Uganda possesses many of the raw materials required to manufacture industrial machinery. If we invest in engineering, technology and machine-building, we can lower the cost of manufacturing, strengthen our industries, create high-value jobs and reduce our dependence on imports. Beyond meeting our own needs, Uganda has the potential to become a regional hub for industrial machinery, supplying equipment to markets across East and Central Africa. True industrialisation is not just about making more products it is about building the machines that make those products. That is where innovation creates lasting economic transformation.

Shyam Tanna

12,282 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Lambda's Stephen Balaban on why cheap energy is the foundation of everything: "The United States government needs to support the construction of a lot more power. What I mean by the hurdle rate of an economy being tied to the price of energy is that if energy is too expensive, you can't do fundamental things like smelting steel, smelting aluminum, or making concrete. Making concrete is an exceptionally energy-intensive process." "All of these input factors toward building an industrial society are high-energy-intensity activities. And if you raise the cost of energy up too high, it becomes a hurdle rate, meaning it's too steep of a hurdle to overcome, and thus we don't do that in the United States anymore." "If the United States is flirting with industrial policy at all, you have to start with the very basic inputs to that, which is less expensive energy. This is beneficial to every single thing we do, whether you're driving your electric vehicle, air conditioning your home, using AI, or smelting steel." stephen balaban

Lambda's Stephen Balaban on why cheap energy is the foundation of everything: "The United States government needs to support the construction of a lot more power. What I mean by the hurdle rate of an economy being tied to the price of energy is that if energy is too expensive, you can't do fundamental things like smelting steel, smelting aluminum, or making concrete. Making concrete is an exceptionally energy-intensive process." "All of these input factors toward building an industrial society are high-energy-intensity activities. And if you raise the cost of energy up too high, it becomes a hurdle rate, meaning it's too steep of a hurdle to overcome, and thus we don't do that in the United States anymore." "If the United States is flirting with industrial policy at all, you have to start with the very basic inputs to that, which is less expensive energy. This is beneficial to every single thing we do, whether you're driving your electric vehicle, air conditioning your home, using AI, or smelting steel." stephen balaban

MTS

14,068 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 BREAKING: The US military has now struck over 11,000 THOUSAND TARGETS in Iran, and it's getting worse for the regime by day "Iran's ballistic missile and drone attacks are down by roughly 90 percent. The United States is also decimating the Iranian regime's Navy. We have destroyed more than 150 of their naval vessels so far, including 92 percent of their largest vessels." "The Iranian Navy has no vessels operating in major regional waterways and no ability to project naval power, which is why they've been assessed as combat ineffective." "Our military continues to obliterate Iran's defense industrial base, with nearly 70 percent of their missile, drone, and naval production facilities and shipyards damaged or destroyed thus far, significantly reducing their ability to pose future threats in the region." "U.S. and Israeli joint forces control the skies and have asserted air dominance over Iran, completing more than 11,000 successful combat flights thus far." HUGE!

🚨 BREAKING: The US military has now struck over 11,000 THOUSAND TARGETS in Iran, and it's getting worse for the regime by day "Iran's ballistic missile and drone attacks are down by roughly 90 percent. The United States is also decimating the Iranian regime's Navy. We have destroyed more than 150 of their naval vessels so far, including 92 percent of their largest vessels." "The Iranian Navy has no vessels operating in major regional waterways and no ability to project naval power, which is why they've been assessed as combat ineffective." "Our military continues to obliterate Iran's defense industrial base, with nearly 70 percent of their missile, drone, and naval production facilities and shipyards damaged or destroyed thus far, significantly reducing their ability to pose future threats in the region." "U.S. and Israeli joint forces control the skies and have asserted air dominance over Iran, completing more than 11,000 successful combat flights thus far." HUGE!

Eric Daugherty

33,093 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

When you realise India cancelled lakhs crore worth of projects in the name of environment and China won every single contract that followed, the entire story looks very different. This is not about environmentalism. This is about who benefited every single time India said no. Between 2009 and 2014 China was aggressively expanding its industrial capacity at a scale the world had never seen. Steel. Mining. Infrastructure. Manufacturing. While Beijing was building at full speed, something very different was happening inside India. Every major project that got announced faced the same pattern. NGO protests arrive almost immediately. Environment Ministry officials respond with remarkable speed. Project halted. Investors stuck. Years pass. Companies give up and leave. POSCO from South Korea was bringing the largest foreign direct investment project in India's history. Fifty two thousand crore. Steel manufacturing. Jobs. Industrial capacity. In 2010 it was halted. Then delayed again. Then delayed again. POSCO eventually walked away after years of waiting. It was not alone. Vedanta. ArcelorMittal. Mega projects across mining and steel that would have built India's industrial backbone were buried under layers of bureaucratic obstruction so thick that the companies simply exhausted themselves and left. Science research facilities got halted. Hydroelectric projects that would have powered India's growth for decades got stopped in the name of environmental protection. Now look at what happened in the international market every time India's mining or steel project got cancelled. The demand those projects would have met did not disappear. The world still needed the steel. Still needed the minerals. Still needed the industrial output. And every single time India stepped back from that supply, China stepped forward to fill it. Normal environment clearance processes on paper. The systematic strangulation of India's industrial growth underneath. The question worth asking is the same one nobody in that era was asking loudly enough. Was this genuinely about protecting India's environment? Or was someone else's economy the real beneficiary of every project India cancelled? The timing is too consistent. The pattern is too clean. And the winner is always the same.

When you realise India cancelled lakhs crore worth of projects in the name of environment and China won every single contract that followed, the entire story looks very different. This is not about environmentalism. This is about who benefited every single time India said no. Between 2009 and 2014 China was aggressively expanding its industrial capacity at a scale the world had never seen. Steel. Mining. Infrastructure. Manufacturing. While Beijing was building at full speed, something very different was happening inside India. Every major project that got announced faced the same pattern. NGO protests arrive almost immediately. Environment Ministry officials respond with remarkable speed. Project halted. Investors stuck. Years pass. Companies give up and leave. POSCO from South Korea was bringing the largest foreign direct investment project in India's history. Fifty two thousand crore. Steel manufacturing. Jobs. Industrial capacity. In 2010 it was halted. Then delayed again. Then delayed again. POSCO eventually walked away after years of waiting. It was not alone. Vedanta. ArcelorMittal. Mega projects across mining and steel that would have built India's industrial backbone were buried under layers of bureaucratic obstruction so thick that the companies simply exhausted themselves and left. Science research facilities got halted. Hydroelectric projects that would have powered India's growth for decades got stopped in the name of environmental protection. Now look at what happened in the international market every time India's mining or steel project got cancelled. The demand those projects would have met did not disappear. The world still needed the steel. Still needed the minerals. Still needed the industrial output. And every single time India stepped back from that supply, China stepped forward to fill it. Normal environment clearance processes on paper. The systematic strangulation of India's industrial growth underneath. The question worth asking is the same one nobody in that era was asking loudly enough. Was this genuinely about protecting India's environment? Or was someone else's economy the real beneficiary of every project India cancelled? The timing is too consistent. The pattern is too clean. And the winner is always the same.

Karan Datta 🇮🇳

37,532 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Financial Logic Behind the Parade of the World's Most Powerful Military China Beckons Global Capital - A Strategic Display for the World’s Investors China’s September 3rd grand military parades are far more than spectacles for domestic and world audiences—they are meticulously orchestrated broadcasts to the world’s capital markets. Beneath the orchestrated marches and thunder of steel lies a financial logic, one attuned to the instincts of global capital. The Real Message to Global Capital What do investors see beyond the flags and formations? Not sentiment, not ideology, not the thunder of the crowd. They see security—a clear signal that, in a world roiled by pandemics, war in Ukraine, Middle Eastern conflict, shipping disruptions, and ballooning Western debt, there is a place of stability. Capital cares about only one thing: safety. Money lost can be earned again, but when security vanishes, all assets become bubbles. Militaries worldwide grow their budgets and speak of peace, but markets remain jittery—seeking havens resilient to shock. So when Beijing unveils its missile arrays, naval assets, drone swarms, and integrated systems on live television, Wall Street and City analysts take notice. This is not just a show of strength for the public—it’s a public safety manual for capital: “Place your assets here; they will be protected.” War, if it comes at all, will be short. The balance is no longer in question. Against all of its adversaries combined, China’s advantage is systemic and overwhelming—rooted in industrial scale, electronic dominance, and logistical reach that no coalition can match. Modern war is not won by individual platforms but by networks that see farther, strike faster, and replace losses instantly. In such an environment, the first hours would decide the outcome; within days, the conflict would be over—not through attrition, but through paralysis of the opponent’s entire command, supply, and economic lifelines. Industrial Power as the Ultimate Moat The true foundation of national strength is industrial power. Modern conflict is a contest of supply chains, technology, and resilience. The parade is a window into decades of accumulation: green energy materials, rare earth reserves, advanced chip production, and self-sustaining manufacturing chains. What was once imported or controlled by others—gallium nitride, rare earths, satellite navigation—has become domestically mastered. “Made in China” was expected to falter; instead, the supply chain underwent a decisive reshuffle and upgrade. EVs conquer export markets, shipbuilding leads the world, robotics and high-end machine tools rapidly close the gap. This resilience is the true strategic moat—one that global capital cannot ignore. Weaponry is the manifestation of this industrial might. A deindustrialized nation can neither innovate nor defend. Each missile, tank and drone at the parade signals the health of the wider industrial ecosystem.

The Financial Logic Behind the Parade of the World's Most Powerful Military China Beckons Global Capital - A Strategic Display for the World’s Investors China’s September 3rd grand military parades are far more than spectacles for domestic and world audiences—they are meticulously orchestrated broadcasts to the world’s capital markets. Beneath the orchestrated marches and thunder of steel lies a financial logic, one attuned to the instincts of global capital. The Real Message to Global Capital What do investors see beyond the flags and formations? Not sentiment, not ideology, not the thunder of the crowd. They see security—a clear signal that, in a world roiled by pandemics, war in Ukraine, Middle Eastern conflict, shipping disruptions, and ballooning Western debt, there is a place of stability. Capital cares about only one thing: safety. Money lost can be earned again, but when security vanishes, all assets become bubbles. Militaries worldwide grow their budgets and speak of peace, but markets remain jittery—seeking havens resilient to shock. So when Beijing unveils its missile arrays, naval assets, drone swarms, and integrated systems on live television, Wall Street and City analysts take notice. This is not just a show of strength for the public—it’s a public safety manual for capital: “Place your assets here; they will be protected.” War, if it comes at all, will be short. The balance is no longer in question. Against all of its adversaries combined, China’s advantage is systemic and overwhelming—rooted in industrial scale, electronic dominance, and logistical reach that no coalition can match. Modern war is not won by individual platforms but by networks that see farther, strike faster, and replace losses instantly. In such an environment, the first hours would decide the outcome; within days, the conflict would be over—not through attrition, but through paralysis of the opponent’s entire command, supply, and economic lifelines. Industrial Power as the Ultimate Moat The true foundation of national strength is industrial power. Modern conflict is a contest of supply chains, technology, and resilience. The parade is a window into decades of accumulation: green energy materials, rare earth reserves, advanced chip production, and self-sustaining manufacturing chains. What was once imported or controlled by others—gallium nitride, rare earths, satellite navigation—has become domestically mastered. “Made in China” was expected to falter; instead, the supply chain underwent a decisive reshuffle and upgrade. EVs conquer export markets, shipbuilding leads the world, robotics and high-end machine tools rapidly close the gap. This resilience is the true strategic moat—one that global capital cannot ignore. Weaponry is the manifestation of this industrial might. A deindustrialized nation can neither innovate nor defend. Each missile, tank and drone at the parade signals the health of the wider industrial ecosystem.

America-China Watcher

55,940 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇰🇷🇺🇸 BREAKING - South Korean industrial giants Hanwha, Samsung, and Hyundai Heavy Industries have launched active cooperation with the Pentagon to help revive U.S. shipbuilding and accelerate the construction and repair of military vessels. 🔻 As part of this cooperation, Hyundai has restored a strategic shipyard in Subic Bay, Philippines, establishing a major hub for servicing frigates and patrol ships, with discussions also underway on the production of combat units. 🔻 Hanwha, which acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, is creating two centers: one as a production base in Philadelphia and another as a repair hub in Busan, South Korea, where up to 11 U.S. naval vessels are expected to be serviced annually. 🔻 Samsung Heavy Industries has signed an agreement with Vigor Marine Group and will work simultaneously at five American shipyards, while also investing in the retraining of the U.S. workforce. 🔻 Altogether, these steps are creating a unified and sustainable network for joint fleet production and maintenance, where South Korean expertise and advanced technologies are integrated with U.S. infrastructure and labor. 🔻 For the U.S. Navy, this represents an opportunity to speed up shipbuilding and repair — a critical need amid existing delays and capacity shortages, as well as growing competition with China at sea. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇰🇷🇺🇸 BREAKING - South Korean industrial giants Hanwha, Samsung, and Hyundai Heavy Industries have launched active cooperation with the Pentagon to help revive U.S. shipbuilding and accelerate the construction and repair of military vessels. 🔻 As part of this cooperation, Hyundai has restored a strategic shipyard in Subic Bay, Philippines, establishing a major hub for servicing frigates and patrol ships, with discussions also underway on the production of combat units. 🔻 Hanwha, which acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, is creating two centers: one as a production base in Philadelphia and another as a repair hub in Busan, South Korea, where up to 11 U.S. naval vessels are expected to be serviced annually. 🔻 Samsung Heavy Industries has signed an agreement with Vigor Marine Group and will work simultaneously at five American shipyards, while also investing in the retraining of the U.S. workforce. 🔻 Altogether, these steps are creating a unified and sustainable network for joint fleet production and maintenance, where South Korean expertise and advanced technologies are integrated with U.S. infrastructure and labor. 🔻 For the U.S. Navy, this represents an opportunity to speed up shipbuilding and repair — a critical need amid existing delays and capacity shortages, as well as growing competition with China at sea. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

1,192,271 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It's not Israel pulling the strings re: the attack on Iran. When you follow the money, the real picture is much more compelling.... Simon Dixon explains: "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else... "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change." This clip of Dixon (Simon Dixon), an angel investor, is taken from a conversation with a co-host of BTC Sessions (BTC Sessions 😎) the Bitcoin Mentor (Bitcoin Mentor) posted to YouTube on March 11, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else. "Okay, so they don't lose their military. They want the forever war somewhere else. But the military, because Saudi and the Gulf countries are now exerting their influence. So let me tell you who's actually in the war. You got the US military industrial complex. You got hard liner factions of the IRGC that are maintaining their power from war. You've got Israel and the Zionist ideology. You've got the neocons in America that are owned by the AIPAC and US lobby, and that's the military industrial complex one side of the war. "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change. "With these elements, and you still have the IRGC, you make the world think it's regime change. Because if you have regime change you'll have an uprising. You'll turn Iran into Syria with 90 million people. You'll create a vacuum, you'll create carnage. That's the military model. This is the financial industrial complex. And they're aligned with China and BRICS. "So you've got the GCC, you've got BRICS, you've got factions within Iran and they have to turn part of the regime change of what happened in Israel as well, which will be a GCC-aligned rather than America-aligned, less radicalized puppet government just like you have in Syria right now. He used to be head of ISIS, but now he works for Turkey in the GCC. "He has a job and his job is to get regional stability in line with the regional powers. And if he fails, you just take him out and call him a terrorist. If he succeeds, then you need a successor. So the real battle is MIC [military industrial complex] versus FIC [financial industrial complex]. It's not Iran versus Israel versus America. When you follow the money, that's what it's, it's saying. "Now, okay, so you won and I believe FIC will win. Yep. You know, there's more, there's more power there. But you've got to de-radicalize all these MICs. You got the radical Zionists, the evangelical Christian neocons in America. You got to, you got to take out those IRGC hardliners. And you've got to reform Israel. So you defund Israel eventually. So it's not being funded by a military. "You get Tucker Carlson, Candace Owen and all these people to de-radicalize the evangelical Christians in America. These are connected to high levels of CIA operatives. And then you strategically weaken Israel, strategically weaken Iran, and now you just got to get the US military bases out. And so that faction, I believe is coordinating the next stage of the theater. "The negotiations haven't stopped. Part of the negotiations that led to this battle was that they said, start the war and we'll know who the people that derail the plan are. Some of them might kill children in a school in Iran. And 165 6- to 12-year-old children were killed and they're investigating it right now. My guess is that's an Israel operation. America's deciding whether they're going to cover up for it. "But when you find out who's going off plan, those are the people that need to be regime changed and eliminated, okay? So every time someone goes really too far, like blowing up water plants that would effectively, you know, those are the people that are going to be eliminated until the last people standing are the ones that were sat around the negotiation table. "You'll notice how everyone that was negotiating is still alive today. That's what you'll notice. And I reckon they stay alive till the end. And there are people from IRGC, people from the Iranian government, and they will stay."

It's not Israel pulling the strings re: the attack on Iran. When you follow the money, the real picture is much more compelling.... Simon Dixon explains: "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else... "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change." This clip of Dixon (Simon Dixon), an angel investor, is taken from a conversation with a co-host of BTC Sessions (BTC Sessions 😎) the Bitcoin Mentor (Bitcoin Mentor) posted to YouTube on March 11, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We are not in a war between Iran, Israel and America. We are in a war between the military industrial complex and the factions aligned with the military industrial complex that profit from it and the financial industrial complex that are aligned with Gulf countries and China and American financial powers that now want the Build Back Better phase. "They're done with the war now. They want the Build Back Better phase and they want the military to go somewhere else. "Okay, so they don't lose their military. They want the forever war somewhere else. But the military, because Saudi and the Gulf countries are now exerting their influence. So let me tell you who's actually in the war. You got the US military industrial complex. You got hard liner factions of the IRGC that are maintaining their power from war. You've got Israel and the Zionist ideology. You've got the neocons in America that are owned by the AIPAC and US lobby, and that's the military industrial complex one side of the war. "The other side of the war, you've got the financial industrial complex that wants regional stability. You got the Gulf sovereign wealth funds. You've got the reformist pragmatists within, Iran, that is the Iranian government. And you got people within IRGC that recognize that this is an existential threat. And so they're on board with the more hardliner elements of the IRGC, so it requires change. "With these elements, and you still have the IRGC, you make the world think it's regime change. Because if you have regime change you'll have an uprising. You'll turn Iran into Syria with 90 million people. You'll create a vacuum, you'll create carnage. That's the military model. This is the financial industrial complex. And they're aligned with China and BRICS. "So you've got the GCC, you've got BRICS, you've got factions within Iran and they have to turn part of the regime change of what happened in Israel as well, which will be a GCC-aligned rather than America-aligned, less radicalized puppet government just like you have in Syria right now. He used to be head of ISIS, but now he works for Turkey in the GCC. "He has a job and his job is to get regional stability in line with the regional powers. And if he fails, you just take him out and call him a terrorist. If he succeeds, then you need a successor. So the real battle is MIC [military industrial complex] versus FIC [financial industrial complex]. It's not Iran versus Israel versus America. When you follow the money, that's what it's, it's saying. "Now, okay, so you won and I believe FIC will win. Yep. You know, there's more, there's more power there. But you've got to de-radicalize all these MICs. You got the radical Zionists, the evangelical Christian neocons in America. You got to, you got to take out those IRGC hardliners. And you've got to reform Israel. So you defund Israel eventually. So it's not being funded by a military. "You get Tucker Carlson, Candace Owen and all these people to de-radicalize the evangelical Christians in America. These are connected to high levels of CIA operatives. And then you strategically weaken Israel, strategically weaken Iran, and now you just got to get the US military bases out. And so that faction, I believe is coordinating the next stage of the theater. "The negotiations haven't stopped. Part of the negotiations that led to this battle was that they said, start the war and we'll know who the people that derail the plan are. Some of them might kill children in a school in Iran. And 165 6- to 12-year-old children were killed and they're investigating it right now. My guess is that's an Israel operation. America's deciding whether they're going to cover up for it. "But when you find out who's going off plan, those are the people that need to be regime changed and eliminated, okay? So every time someone goes really too far, like blowing up water plants that would effectively, you know, those are the people that are going to be eliminated until the last people standing are the ones that were sat around the negotiation table. "You'll notice how everyone that was negotiating is still alive today. That's what you'll notice. And I reckon they stay alive till the end. And there are people from IRGC, people from the Iranian government, and they will stay."

Sense Receptor

49,368 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This video showcases Iran's largest power plant, capable of producing around 2,880 megawatts of electricity, which serves as a vital component of Iran's energy infrastructure. This plant supplies power not just for industrial operations but also for the everyday residential needs of millions of Iranians. It stands as a symbol of Iran's energy independence, and its destruction would deal a massive blow to the country's ability to function normally. If Iran chooses to escalate tensions by launching a ballistic missile attack on Israel today, they must be fully prepared for the inevitable and unprecedented retaliation from Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) will not hesitate to strike at the heart of Iran's power grid, targeting this very power plant along with many others, plunging the nation into darkness and chaos. Such a decisive strike would serve to humiliate the Ayatollahs and force their hand, potentially opening the floodgates for a wider conflict in which Israel will target not just energy infrastructure but also Iran’s critical refineries and nuclear facilities. The IDF's response will be relentless and uncompromising. Israel has one of the most advanced air forces in the world, equipped with precision-guided missiles and the latest technology, making these power plants, refineries, and even Iran’s nuclear sites easy targets for destruction. Any strike on Israel by Iran will be met with overwhelming force, as Israel exercises its right to self-defense and ensures that the Ayatollahs and their regime understand the consequences of their aggression. This isn't merely a matter of retaliatory strikes; it's about sending a clear and unambiguous message that Iran's support for terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, and any direct attack on Israel, will be met with devastating consequences. If Iran decides to open this Pandora's box, the Ayatollahs must understand that Israel will have no hesitation in cutting off Iran's power supply, not just metaphorically but quite literally, by dismantling the very infrastructure that keeps the country running. The repercussions of such a strike would be catastrophic for Iran. Entire cities could be plunged into darkness, industries would grind to a halt, and the economy could face irreversible damage. This action would not only cripple Iran’s capacity to wage war but would also serve as a lesson that any aggression toward Israel will be answered with overwhelming and unyielding force. Israel possesses the military capability and strategic acumen to execute such a campaign effectively. And should Iran choose the path of confrontation, Israel’s response will not be a mere show of force – it will be a decisive act that might send Iran’s energy infrastructure back to the stone age. This isn’t just a matter of military might; it’s about demonstrating that any act of aggression against Israel will be met with a level of retaliation that could leave Iran in darkness, potentially forever. Therefore, Iran should carefully consider its next moves. A strike against Israel would not only be an act of war but also an invitation for its own devastation. The Ayatollahs must understand that their dreams of expanding their influence across the Middle East through aggression will meet a dead end when faced with the full might of Israel's military response.

This video showcases Iran's largest power plant, capable of producing around 2,880 megawatts of electricity, which serves as a vital component of Iran's energy infrastructure. This plant supplies power not just for industrial operations but also for the everyday residential needs of millions of Iranians. It stands as a symbol of Iran's energy independence, and its destruction would deal a massive blow to the country's ability to function normally. If Iran chooses to escalate tensions by launching a ballistic missile attack on Israel today, they must be fully prepared for the inevitable and unprecedented retaliation from Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) will not hesitate to strike at the heart of Iran's power grid, targeting this very power plant along with many others, plunging the nation into darkness and chaos. Such a decisive strike would serve to humiliate the Ayatollahs and force their hand, potentially opening the floodgates for a wider conflict in which Israel will target not just energy infrastructure but also Iran’s critical refineries and nuclear facilities. The IDF's response will be relentless and uncompromising. Israel has one of the most advanced air forces in the world, equipped with precision-guided missiles and the latest technology, making these power plants, refineries, and even Iran’s nuclear sites easy targets for destruction. Any strike on Israel by Iran will be met with overwhelming force, as Israel exercises its right to self-defense and ensures that the Ayatollahs and their regime understand the consequences of their aggression. This isn't merely a matter of retaliatory strikes; it's about sending a clear and unambiguous message that Iran's support for terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, and any direct attack on Israel, will be met with devastating consequences. If Iran decides to open this Pandora's box, the Ayatollahs must understand that Israel will have no hesitation in cutting off Iran's power supply, not just metaphorically but quite literally, by dismantling the very infrastructure that keeps the country running. The repercussions of such a strike would be catastrophic for Iran. Entire cities could be plunged into darkness, industries would grind to a halt, and the economy could face irreversible damage. This action would not only cripple Iran’s capacity to wage war but would also serve as a lesson that any aggression toward Israel will be answered with overwhelming and unyielding force. Israel possesses the military capability and strategic acumen to execute such a campaign effectively. And should Iran choose the path of confrontation, Israel’s response will not be a mere show of force – it will be a decisive act that might send Iran’s energy infrastructure back to the stone age. This isn’t just a matter of military might; it’s about demonstrating that any act of aggression against Israel will be met with a level of retaliation that could leave Iran in darkness, potentially forever. Therefore, Iran should carefully consider its next moves. A strike against Israel would not only be an act of war but also an invitation for its own devastation. The Ayatollahs must understand that their dreams of expanding their influence across the Middle East through aggression will meet a dead end when faced with the full might of Israel's military response.

Torsten Prochnow

392,685 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren