In similar cases, juries have found protestors not guilty based on a belief that they were acting from a desire to prevent war crimes. Proscribing Palestine Action sets a dangerous and worrying precedent.

The Times reported Iranian funding for Palestine Action. This puts their act sabotage at Brize Norton firmly under the auspices of Section 12 of the National Security Act 2023. What is worrying is that there MPs who are in support of sabotage.

The left really are fucking retarded.

Attacking our military base sets a dangerous and worrying precedent. Stop supporting terrorists. There is some free advice

"A group sitting in Westminster openly opposes the proscription of Palestine Action, a group that openly vandalises British defence infrastructure, glorifies Hamas, and mocks Holocaust victims on our streets."

>Proscribing Palestine Action sets a dangerous and worrying precedent No. Allowing crimes because you somehow sympathize with the goals of the perpetrator (for whatever weired reasons) would set the "dangerous and worrying precedent".

When before have protestors attacked a Ministry of Defence installation to sabotage planes? It’s a bit more serious than glueing yourself to the road, toots. In most countries you’d be shot dead.

If I burn your house down to prevent a greenicide is that ok?

Another terrorist appeaser. Get out of our Parliament - you don’t belong there.

You should lose your position as MP and be prosecuted for treason, shame on you!

No it doesn’t this is sabotage not protest and you are a traitor.