"In this country, you cannot bring a case that is a hypothetical... There has to be a real dispute... This is somebody who, there was no real issue, there was no complaint. This wasn't even somebody who had opened up a business" - Andrew Weissmann (weissmann11 on Threads/Insta)🌻 w/... Nicolle Wallaceshow more

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace But what does one do if SCOTUS is doing something unconstitutional 🤯.

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace Roberts gets no pass on this one, outrageous. 💔🇺🇸 just shaking my head

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace The election was not stolen but the Supreme Court was!

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace Why was this even heard by scotus then? These justices need to go. We need ethics rules and we need term limits. No lifetime appointments for anything!

@NormOrnstein @AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace If "in this country, you cannot bring a case that is a hypothetical...There has to be a real dispute..." then HOW the hell was this case brought....ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT???? Who is funding this?????

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace So what happens now? Can anyone just bring a made up case before the court now? If there was any chance of anyone believing anything they rule on is gone.

@WyoJudyShepard @AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace we keep hearing complaints about 'libs being woke' and 'making woke policy decisions' > yet I doubt you'll hear a single word from these same folks regarding this SCOTUS ruling, claiming standing based on fears of a possible harm when no harm has been demonstrated

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace My thought when @NicolleDWallace said the court is a stench on steroids:

@AWeissmann_ @NicolleDWallace Thank you, Andrew, for speaking the truth. The GOP WILL expand the court when they can. There is perfect logic for doing so now based on appellate court number. Plus, as you pointed out, the case load is too great.