正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

In today's interview: "If someone can log into IReV and upload results using any device instead of the BVAS machine, this raises serious digital accountability and chain-of-custody questions. We are not alleging votes were altered or that anything unlawful happened. We're flagging a systems design issue that shouldn't exist....

14,491 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Big Mo’ 🦅 的头像
Big Mo’ 🦅14 天前

Let’s even take it a step further and demand that any file uploaded from the BVAS machine whose EXIF metadata shows that the image was captured outside the election window should be rejected.

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

Metadata verification (timestamps, geolocation, etc.) is exactly the kind of technical layer that strengthens result credibility

Ade 的头像
Ade14 天前

Proud of you and what you are doing .Much respect

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

We appreciate you

King Ninho 的头像
King Ninho14 天前

That’s why they changed the electoral act to allow use of electoral result sheets without INEC stamp. They plan to upload result sheets from other devices other than the approved BVAS.

Kingsley Imoni-Ogbe👁️‍🗨️ 的头像
Kingsley Imoni-Ogbe👁️‍🗨️14 天前

Well done my friend

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

Thank you

Unforseen Forces - ₿§ | 🇩🇪 的头像
Unforseen Forces - ₿§ | 🇩🇪14 天前

Wahala No dey finish

Mr 9izeGuy 的头像
Mr 9izeGuy14 天前

Keep it up Martins

Ndugbu Uche Christopher 的头像
Ndugbu Uche Christopher14 天前

What are the opposition doing to checkmate these concerns. Oppositions are not ready yet.

Cheedee (MNSE) 的头像
Cheedee (MNSE)13 天前

Well done @mundx_analytics Keep up the good work. It is really sad that @inecnigeria can’t / won’t provide this detailed analysis into the 2023 elections and they won’t offer a satisfactory explanation to Nigerians now that it has been uncovered.

Uzomah C Prosper 的头像
Uzomah C Prosper13 天前

Jeffery is classic

Unique Uche 的头像
Unique Uche14 天前

Very articulate

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

Thank you

VeeQo, MBA 的头像
VeeQo, MBA14 天前

They will probably do same in 2027. That’s where their confidence comes from.

Excess O, MBA🎓 的头像
Excess O, MBA🎓14 天前

@Vandaygee You are doing well brother

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

@Vandaygee Thank you

JIMOH OLU MAYOWA 的头像
JIMOH OLU MAYOWA13 天前

Please can will get the Area or regional representations of those 48% uploaded without BVAS?

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics13 天前

Thanks for the interest. We discussed that in our recent interview!

Your Nemesis 的头像
Your Nemesis14 天前

Now that we have presented this issue, can the opposition challenge the election result in the law court? Is this issue judiciable?

Uche Sixtus 的头像
Uche Sixtus13 天前

Thank you for this @mundx_analytics

PorcupinePiercing 的头像
PorcupinePiercing14 天前

The bigger pain in question is assuming but not entirely saying so... The evidence admissibility is not but almost impossible

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics14 天前

That's a fair point . Evidentiary standards are always the hard part.

PorcupinePiercing 的头像
PorcupinePiercing13 天前

Yeah Right @mundus01 I have been studying on Proving s case & you see that EC8 A and B juxtapose Evidence act & the new elevtiros law holds so much power. To beat this is to not allow voter apathy. Painful I also note that one a presiding officer signs it cant be invalidated O

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics13 天前

@mundus01 Appreciate the legal breakdown 🙏

PorcupinePiercing 的头像
PorcupinePiercing13 天前

@mundus01 Good Morning I appreciate you so much more. The platform is so simplified .. I am happy I have reference to show my mentees that we can and have fogged fellas who can handle these things sway from all the Get someone from abroad

Mundx Analytics 的头像
Mundx Analytics13 天前

@mundus01 Thank you so much This means a lot! Glad the platform's been a useful reference. 🙏

Obi-4-Runner😎 的头像
Obi-4-Runner😎14 天前

This is absolutely nonsense, you're trying to cause panic while you use the same pattern to rig the elections. We shall follow this to the End. Tinubu can never win Elections in Nigeria. Because he failed woefully

jamesagada 的头像
jamesagada14 天前

Wrong assumption here. The bvas application according to INEC is an android appliction. Any android phone could run the application and upload the data.

Olowonyo Olugbenga  的头像
Olowonyo Olugbenga 14 天前

That's crazy....

Gospel 的头像
Gospel14 天前

@Megautche @cupid4cool

BAMS ABIOLA 的头像
BAMS ABIOLA13 天前

Weldone..

AmBETA_ 的头像
AmBETA_13 天前

It's gone,.....choeeee! In sabinus voice

相关视频

2026 Fulton County Election Fraud Report finds THOUSANDS of FALSE BALLOTS added to the post-election hand count/audit, which lowered Biden's margin of victory and vote total by about 50,000 to 60,000 votes, indicating that Trump did indeed win Georgia in the 2020 election. This isn't even counting all of the other fraud found GA. As a result of the 36 errors, 6,691 fictitious ballots that do not exist were added to the "Total Ballots Cast" column. After removing the false ballots from the total, because they do not exist, Fulton County's corrected Total Ballots Cast for the hand count/audit is 521,341, or 7,436 ballots less than the certified Nov. 3rd total of 528,777. Of these, candidate Trump received 1,025 false votes that do not exist, while candidate Biden received 5,618 false votes that do not exist. Correcting for the errors from only the absentee ballots of one county, the hand count/audit results yield a margin of victory that is 4,593 votes less than the November 3rd results. 11,779 was the total margin of victory for the entire state. A review of only 3 percent of the ballots yielded errors that falsely inflated the margin of victory for the hand count/audit by one-third. Based on these errors alone, the margin of victory drops to 7,185. The 36 errors mysteriously added a sufficient number of ballots and votes to substantiate the November 3rd results, albeit falsely. Just as the hand count/audit was used as a metric to corroborate the November 3rd results, the errors call those results in to question. First, there was no investigation beyond that which was carried out by Mr. Rossi and the Governor's office as the Secretary of State's investigator did not perform an investigation. Second, the claim that the error were unintentional is refuted by the fact that 35 of the 36 inconsistencies benefited one candidate. Next, the failures were not the product of data entry errors. Lastly, the conclusion and excuse that the errors did not affect the outcome of the presidential contest is irrelevant and not responsive to the allegation, as the race for president extended past the Fulton County line, and so did the "errors" that were found. It gets even better... A total of eight 8 false batch entries are included in the results in which candidate Trump erroneously receives ZERO votes, and almost all are supported with a batch tally sheet. Errors with a batch tally sheet that don’t match the corresponding ballots are not the product of mistake or unintentional error. It is indisputable that the batch tally sheets identified by Mr. Rossi and Governor Kemp were intentionally fabricated to falsely pad the hand-count/audit results in line with the November 3rd results. Georgia law explicitly states that any superintendent or employee who intentionally destroys or alters tally papers, or permits them to be destroyed or altered, shall be guilty of a felony. Fulton County's chaotic, unaccountable curation and processing of cast ballots, cast BMD printout, and electronic records make a true risk-limiting audit impossible. It is unreasonable for voters to trust that their votes were counted at all, much less counted correctly. Voters have good reason to believe that some votes counted more than others, some votes were included twice or 3x in the totals. There is no way to know how many votes were omitted from the tabulation, absent access to the physical ballots and BMD printout and evidence that the chain of custody is intact. From the records produced so far, it Is impossible to determine whether malware, bugs, misconfiguration, or malfeasance disenfranchised voters or altered the election results. The fact that thousands of false ballots and votes were unveiled should have triggered a real investigation, not only of Fulton County's November 3rd election results, but those of the entire state. We can use the same mathematical basis as the Risk Limiting Audit by using Fulton County’s rate of error- and extrapolate. Approximately 148,000 absentee ballots were cast in Fulton County, and out of those, 6,691, 4.52%, were found to be false, or in error. A total of 1,311,061 absentee ballots were cast in the state of Georgia for the 2020 General Election. Using the same percentage, 4.52%, of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: 1,311,061 x .0452 = 59,259 false ballots/votes Using the same ratio of distribution of false ballots/votes as that confirmed in Fulton County: Candidate Biden: 83.9% of 59,259 = 49,718 false votes Candidate Trump: 15.3% of 59,259 = 9,066 false votes Therefore, using the Fulton County hand count/audit error rate, as established by the Governor's report on just the absentee ballots cast, the error rate is determinative, and it is possible that the wrong candidate did take office. Ms. McGowan's assertion that the hand count/audit errors did not affect the outcome of the race, is not supported by fact. Given the egregious manipulation in Fulton County, failing and/or refusing to check the hand count/audit results of the other 158 counties constitutes gross negligence, if not willful misconduct and fraud. On top of these findings, Fulton County election officials knew the hand-count/audit results were falsely inflated. There are a confirmed 6,691 fictitious votes that were added to the hand-count/audit results, but were NEVER corrected. An email found corresponds, which is located in this report, establishes the fact that Fulton County election officials knew of the errors at the time, even the same day that the Secretary of State released the results. (PAGE 171 in the video report above contains the email to view.) For some five 5+ years, the hand-count/audit results, known by Fulton County to be materially defective, have been used to falsely substantiate the official results. The same fraudulent results have also been used against those who rightfully questioned Georgia's election results. Lastly, for just this report and presentation, the hand-count tally sheets DO NOT MATCH results from advance voting polling locations. Poll tapes were compared for all tabulators at each polling location to the corresponding batch tally sheets as produced during the hand-count/audit. The fact that such differences between the hand counted audited ballot tallies and the official machine count tallies differs by this much signals that tabulation and auditing processes are flawed and strongly argue for intense objective expert examination and considerable mitigation efforts. It should be the case that such counts are consistent and exact. The fact that such audit discrepancies at a precinct level did not cause precertification investigations of the count variances is unacceptable, it essentially defeats the purpose of an audit if significant discrepancies are ignored and chalked up to human error. As they seem to have been at least in the case of the Fulton County audit. It is irrefutable that the hand count/audit results were indeed the result of intentional human acts, aka, FRAUD. Read full report for all details and visual evidence above in video report. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

46,379 次观看 • 2 个月前