正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Incisive observation from John Doyle in response to a bit from the Tucker monologue. Encourage you to watch the whole thing, but the gist of it is that Tucker's example of a "great empire" that "ruled half the world" and then set into a slow and steady decline is... not Rome but rather...the Ottoman Empire? Really? John's point is a good one - Tucker presumably thinks this is more interesting to his increasingly foreign audience than say, the Byzantines, but I think there's another question to be asked. Who is writing this for Tucker? Could it simply have been that the writer himself/herself is some sort of Muslim and inserted this in simply out of ethnic or religious bias? Questions to be asked!show more

captive dreamer

84,655 subscribers

36,990 次观看 • 24 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I bet Elizabeth Lane on Tucker's show is driving the paid propagandists that are fighting against the truthers ABSOLUTELY NUTS! ✅ Tucker Carlson ELIZABETH LANE 🔴INTRODUCTION 👇 ▎ TUCKER: "…you have been accused of being a foreign intel operative, right? Which you deny." ▎ LANE: "Of course." ▎ TUCKER: "I just want to say out loud, I don't care. Because that's not the point. The point is, is the story you're about to tell true or is it not?... The whole thing is a diversion tactic designed to get you off of whatever the person has claimed onto the person. And I don't personally play along with that." Watch this and tell me how it makes you feel ⬇️

I bet Elizabeth Lane on Tucker's show is driving the paid propagandists that are fighting against the truthers ABSOLUTELY NUTS! ✅ Tucker Carlson ELIZABETH LANE 🔴INTRODUCTION 👇 ▎ TUCKER: "…you have been accused of being a foreign intel operative, right? Which you deny." ▎ LANE: "Of course." ▎ TUCKER: "I just want to say out loud, I don't care. Because that's not the point. The point is, is the story you're about to tell true or is it not?... The whole thing is a diversion tactic designed to get you off of whatever the person has claimed onto the person. And I don't personally play along with that." Watch this and tell me how it makes you feel ⬇️

Danks

14,681 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is the actual truth about "The Bibi Files" – this is all old information we all figured out years ago, but Tucker and his gullible audience are trying to play catch-up. Btw, don't give Tucker $6 to watch the documentary. It is online. This is NOT Tucker's documentary, like he claims in this post I am reposting. Tucker is a con artist. Also, I do recommend people watch it and then look into the claims. This documentary is a big nothing-burger and is the equivalent of a left wing coalition making a documentary on Trump.

This is the actual truth about "The Bibi Files" – this is all old information we all figured out years ago, but Tucker and his gullible audience are trying to play catch-up. Btw, don't give Tucker $6 to watch the documentary. It is online. This is NOT Tucker's documentary, like he claims in this post I am reposting. Tucker is a con artist. Also, I do recommend people watch it and then look into the claims. This documentary is a big nothing-burger and is the equivalent of a left wing coalition making a documentary on Trump.

Nick Matau

39,732 次观看 • 5 个月前

Watch Tucker Carlson educate Tyler Oliveira in the art of pernicious obfuscation and strategic dishonesty in real time. A master of deceit and his rather slow student, on display for all. Tyler mentions the long-debunked lie that Hatzolah left Gavin Cato to die in Crown Heights. Tyler himself is too ignorant and naive to know this isn't true. He's in it for the clicks, but doesn't know the art yet of pushing a lie to the brink, but then creating the fiction of not knowing for coverage. Tucker, relishing the chance to push Antisemitism to the brink, builds the narrative further. But it's a lie. And Tucker knows it. Governor Mario Cuomo's fact finding report by Richard Girgenti, neither of the Jewish, makes that clear. Richard Green, also not Jewish, has confirmed... Tucker is volunerable. So in real time he teaches Tyler how to create coverage. "Well, that was the claim. I wasn't there," he says. He laughs. See this is all just a fun conversation. Tyler, realizing that he needs to cover up his lies, laughs as well. "I wasn't. It's New York and everyone lies about everything and ethnic conflict is incredibly hard to decipher... I don't really know what happened of course." "I don't know," Tyler says as he gulps water. He lucked out, without Tucker to teach him, it would be clear the emperor has no clothes. That this is all a baldfaced game of hate and lies for engagement clicks and dollars. But of course, they can't just let that go. The game is to push hateful lies for dollars, so you can't just walk it to the brink. Once you have the coverage, then you have the nudge. The wink. "But of course, the account history has recorded..." Tucker begins. But Tyler is not too sharp, he's still doing the walk back "why wouldn't they have an in-group bias... Every person does, obviously" Tucker has to teach Tyler the game in realtime. 'We're done covering our backs,' Tucker knows... Tyler doesn't get it. So tucker has to nudge the ball further, "Whites don't..." he says... Tyler runs with it. He may be slow, but he can kick the ball when Tucker tells him to.

Watch Tucker Carlson educate Tyler Oliveira in the art of pernicious obfuscation and strategic dishonesty in real time. A master of deceit and his rather slow student, on display for all. Tyler mentions the long-debunked lie that Hatzolah left Gavin Cato to die in Crown Heights. Tyler himself is too ignorant and naive to know this isn't true. He's in it for the clicks, but doesn't know the art yet of pushing a lie to the brink, but then creating the fiction of not knowing for coverage. Tucker, relishing the chance to push Antisemitism to the brink, builds the narrative further. But it's a lie. And Tucker knows it. Governor Mario Cuomo's fact finding report by Richard Girgenti, neither of the Jewish, makes that clear. Richard Green, also not Jewish, has confirmed... Tucker is volunerable. So in real time he teaches Tyler how to create coverage. "Well, that was the claim. I wasn't there," he says. He laughs. See this is all just a fun conversation. Tyler, realizing that he needs to cover up his lies, laughs as well. "I wasn't. It's New York and everyone lies about everything and ethnic conflict is incredibly hard to decipher... I don't really know what happened of course." "I don't know," Tyler says as he gulps water. He lucked out, without Tucker to teach him, it would be clear the emperor has no clothes. That this is all a baldfaced game of hate and lies for engagement clicks and dollars. But of course, they can't just let that go. The game is to push hateful lies for dollars, so you can't just walk it to the brink. Once you have the coverage, then you have the nudge. The wink. "But of course, the account history has recorded..." Tucker begins. But Tyler is not too sharp, he's still doing the walk back "why wouldn't they have an in-group bias... Every person does, obviously" Tucker has to teach Tyler the game in realtime. 'We're done covering our backs,' Tucker knows... Tyler doesn't get it. So tucker has to nudge the ball further, "Whites don't..." he says... Tyler runs with it. He may be slow, but he can kick the ball when Tucker tells him to.

Rabbi Mordechai Lightstone

11,428 次观看 • 3 个月前

Charlie Kirk: “The regime hates an informed population. They despise when you know history.” Then he pointed to Tucker: “You’re the one who radicalized me more than anybody else… Tucker would go to his show and keep asking questions.” Then he explained: “Critics always attack Tucker as ‘he’s always asking questions’ but isn’t that what the pursuit of truth is all about?” And Tucker answered: “Free inquiry is the basis of a free society” and “anyone telling you not to ask questions is a threat to you.” This is the whole war: History vs regime. Questions vs control.

Charlie Kirk: “The regime hates an informed population. They despise when you know history.” Then he pointed to Tucker: “You’re the one who radicalized me more than anybody else… Tucker would go to his show and keep asking questions.” Then he explained: “Critics always attack Tucker as ‘he’s always asking questions’ but isn’t that what the pursuit of truth is all about?” And Tucker answered: “Free inquiry is the basis of a free society” and “anyone telling you not to ask questions is a threat to you.” This is the whole war: History vs regime. Questions vs control.

Phantom Pain

77,088 次观看 • 1 个月前

The CDC Doesn't Want You to Hear This Conversation Between Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson TUCKER: Is your average Amish teenager happier than your average conventional American teenager on Instagram? ROGAN: Well, they certainly have less instances of autism, which is really fascinating. It's very, very fascinating. CARLSON: The Amish have less autism? ROGAN: Yeah, there's almost none. TUCKER: Well, I'm not surprised. ROGAN: It's extremely rare. TUCKER: Why do we think that is? ROGAN: I wonder. I really do. TUCKER: Well, I can think of a couple — Yeah, I don't want to go Bobby Kennedy on you. ROGAN: But that's the problem. If you go Bobby Kennedy, they'll come for you. But the question is why? TUCKER: Look, and I don't know the answer, but... ROGAN: How is that not in the debate? How is that not in the conversation? TUCKER: Well, it's not only not in the conversation, you're punished for adding it to the conversation. And so, like... ROGAN: We are dancing around anti-vax conspiracy theories right now. TUCKER: Why be on the defensive? It's like, if you purport to represent science, and you're mad about a question. ROGAN: And you're ignoring data. TUCKER: Yeah, but even in the absence of data, science is a process. Yes. It's not a result. It's a way of doing things. And at the core of science is asking questions, including unlikely questions. That's what science is. And if you don't allow that, then you may be doing something, but what you're not doing is science. We can say that conclusively. So, for people to wrap themselves in the mantle of science and attack you for asking a question, they're frauds.

The CDC Doesn't Want You to Hear This Conversation Between Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson TUCKER: Is your average Amish teenager happier than your average conventional American teenager on Instagram? ROGAN: Well, they certainly have less instances of autism, which is really fascinating. It's very, very fascinating. CARLSON: The Amish have less autism? ROGAN: Yeah, there's almost none. TUCKER: Well, I'm not surprised. ROGAN: It's extremely rare. TUCKER: Why do we think that is? ROGAN: I wonder. I really do. TUCKER: Well, I can think of a couple — Yeah, I don't want to go Bobby Kennedy on you. ROGAN: But that's the problem. If you go Bobby Kennedy, they'll come for you. But the question is why? TUCKER: Look, and I don't know the answer, but... ROGAN: How is that not in the debate? How is that not in the conversation? TUCKER: Well, it's not only not in the conversation, you're punished for adding it to the conversation. And so, like... ROGAN: We are dancing around anti-vax conspiracy theories right now. TUCKER: Why be on the defensive? It's like, if you purport to represent science, and you're mad about a question. ROGAN: And you're ignoring data. TUCKER: Yeah, but even in the absence of data, science is a process. Yes. It's not a result. It's a way of doing things. And at the core of science is asking questions, including unlikely questions. That's what science is. And if you don't allow that, then you may be doing something, but what you're not doing is science. We can say that conclusively. So, for people to wrap themselves in the mantle of science and attack you for asking a question, they're frauds.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

13,620,181 次观看 • 2 年前

‼️EXPOSED: Tucker Carlson's DEVASTATING Takedown of Christian Zionism—Why He Says Mike Huckabee Is A FRAUD 👀 In a stunning interview with the New York Times, Tucker laid out a case that is so logical, so devastating, that it exposes the fraud at the heart of American foreign policy. This isn't about being anti-Israel. This is about being pro-truth, and Tucker is demanding answers to the questions they refuse to answer. 1. THE FALSE PROPHETS. Tucker's Easter message was a direct warning to Christians everywhere. He named the two false prophets he believes are leading the faithful astray: President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. He is arguing that blind loyalty to these men, under the guise of divine mandate, is a dangerous betrayal of Christian principles. 2. THE BRIGHT RED LINE. His opposition is simple and absolute. "Christians can never support the murder of innocents. Period." He challenged the New York Times to find the place in the Bible where Jesus says, "These people are annoying. Kill them all." It's not there. He is calling out the perversion of Christianity to justify violence and war. 3. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONS. Tucker described his revealing, contentious interview with Ambassador Ambassador Mike Huckabee, where he asked two simple, logical questions that no Christian Zionist leader will answer: On what biblical basis are you making the claim that Israel has a unique right to exist? When Tucker asked about the borders laid out in Genesis, Huckabee essentially said, "Fine with me," implying a claim to the entire Middle East. To whom does this right apply? Huckabee said "the Jews," but Tucker points out that this is a theological claim that is being used to justify real-world wars and American deaths. The response to his reasonable questions? "Shut up, anti-Semite." Tucker's conclusion: "You've been exposed as a fraud and or a liar." 4. WHY THIS MATTERS TO AMERICA. This is the critical point. Tucker states he was never interested in this topic until he realized it was destroying his country. He says Israel pushed a U.S. president into a war that is "in the process of destroying the United States economy and getting Americans killed." How do they have that power? Not because of Jewish voters, Tucker argues, but because of "tens of millions of evangelical Christians who unquestioningly support Israel because they believe it's their theological duty to do so." He concludes that this theological question is the single most important issue facing America, because on it "hangs the future of the American economy and the lives of American service members." Tucker Carlson is drawing a line in the sand. He is saying that unquestioning support, based on a fraudulent theological premise, is leading America to ruin. He is demanding that Christians think for themselves and stop following false prophets into wars that are not in our interest. This is the most important monologue of the year. Share it with every Christian you know. 🇺🇸

‼️EXPOSED: Tucker Carlson's DEVASTATING Takedown of Christian Zionism—Why He Says Mike Huckabee Is A FRAUD 👀 In a stunning interview with the New York Times, Tucker laid out a case that is so logical, so devastating, that it exposes the fraud at the heart of American foreign policy. This isn't about being anti-Israel. This is about being pro-truth, and Tucker is demanding answers to the questions they refuse to answer. 1. THE FALSE PROPHETS. Tucker's Easter message was a direct warning to Christians everywhere. He named the two false prophets he believes are leading the faithful astray: President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. He is arguing that blind loyalty to these men, under the guise of divine mandate, is a dangerous betrayal of Christian principles. 2. THE BRIGHT RED LINE. His opposition is simple and absolute. "Christians can never support the murder of innocents. Period." He challenged the New York Times to find the place in the Bible where Jesus says, "These people are annoying. Kill them all." It's not there. He is calling out the perversion of Christianity to justify violence and war. 3. THE UNANSWERABLE QUESTIONS. Tucker described his revealing, contentious interview with Ambassador Ambassador Mike Huckabee, where he asked two simple, logical questions that no Christian Zionist leader will answer: On what biblical basis are you making the claim that Israel has a unique right to exist? When Tucker asked about the borders laid out in Genesis, Huckabee essentially said, "Fine with me," implying a claim to the entire Middle East. To whom does this right apply? Huckabee said "the Jews," but Tucker points out that this is a theological claim that is being used to justify real-world wars and American deaths. The response to his reasonable questions? "Shut up, anti-Semite." Tucker's conclusion: "You've been exposed as a fraud and or a liar." 4. WHY THIS MATTERS TO AMERICA. This is the critical point. Tucker states he was never interested in this topic until he realized it was destroying his country. He says Israel pushed a U.S. president into a war that is "in the process of destroying the United States economy and getting Americans killed." How do they have that power? Not because of Jewish voters, Tucker argues, but because of "tens of millions of evangelical Christians who unquestioningly support Israel because they believe it's their theological duty to do so." He concludes that this theological question is the single most important issue facing America, because on it "hangs the future of the American economy and the lives of American service members." Tucker Carlson is drawing a line in the sand. He is saying that unquestioning support, based on a fraudulent theological premise, is leading America to ruin. He is demanding that Christians think for themselves and stop following false prophets into wars that are not in our interest. This is the most important monologue of the year. Share it with every Christian you know. 🇺🇸

Project Constitution

73,779 次观看 • 4 个月前

Victor Davis Hanson: My Response to Tucker Carlson’s Israel, Qatar Claims “I would like to say—it pains me to say this—but the Tucker that is talking is not the one that I had a seven-to-eight-year relationship with every Monday after the monologue. But to be frank, everything he just said is demonstrably untrue,” argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words:” FULL VIDEO: Jack Fowler

Victor Davis Hanson: My Response to Tucker Carlson’s Israel, Qatar Claims “I would like to say—it pains me to say this—but the Tucker that is talking is not the one that I had a seven-to-eight-year relationship with every Monday after the monologue. But to be frank, everything he just said is demonstrably untrue,” argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words:” FULL VIDEO: Jack Fowler

Daily Signal

702,720 次观看 • 8 个月前

Tucker Carlson and Mike Huckabee discuss why the current President of Israel went to Epstein Island 🏝️ Huckabee: There’s a lot going on in the world, I don’t question every single thing. Tucker: But he’s the president of a country, whom you’re the Ambassador for Huckabee: I understand that, but this is the first I’ve ever heard of this Clip Tucker X

Tucker Carlson and Mike Huckabee discuss why the current President of Israel went to Epstein Island 🏝️ Huckabee: There’s a lot going on in the world, I don’t question every single thing. Tucker: But he’s the president of a country, whom you’re the Ambassador for Huckabee: I understand that, but this is the first I’ve ever heard of this Clip Tucker X

MJTruthUltra

37,248 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson DOUBLED DOWN on attacking Chabad, saying (falsely) that they support "violence against innocents." Tucker also reiterated that "at the center" of the "religious war" in Iran is "the Third Temple," adding that Chabad "is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Some apology. As I had exclusively reported, Tucker on March 4 indicated that Chabad was ultimately behind the war in Iran. Tucker futher — and equally falsely — claimed that this was because Chabad was supposedly a driving force in wanting to destroy the Al Aqsa Mosque in order to rebuild Judaism's holy Temple, or beit hamikdash in Hebrew. After receiving enormous blowback for his comments, Tucker gave what his loyalists have called an apology. It was not. Tucker simply did not address his outrageous assertion that Chabad was agitating for the "destruction of one of the holiest places in Islam." As for the rest of his previous Chabad comments, he simply lied about what he had actually said, pretending as if he had merely commented on patches worn by some soldiers depicting what Tucker insists is the Third Temple. For good measure, he added in the new slander that Chabad actually supports "violence against innocents." To be clear, this is a long-running theme for Tucker over the past year, claiming that Jews, "neocons," and/or Israel have bloodlust and "get a thrill" from murdering people. Crucially, Tucker explicitly stated that it was "true" that the "Third Temple" was "at the center" of what he deemed a "religious war" in Iran. Then he had the audacity to tie it all back to Chabad, saying, "And Chabad, check their website, is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple." Tucker, however, must not have actually checked the Chabad website. That's because the Chabad website states that the Third Temple, or beit hamikdash, can only be rebuilt by God, and only once Moshiach (or the Messiah) has come. What does the Chabad website actually say about how to usher in this divine state of being? "Perform more acts of goodness and kindness" At no point does Tucker reveal that Chabad wants the Third Temple to come not through violence, let alone war, but rather by people performing "acts of goodness and kindness." Perhaps Tucker simply can't wrap his head around this concept, which animates the very essence of Chabad. Why? Because the new Tucker is neither good nor kind.

Joel Mowbray

658,645 次观看 • 6 个月前

TUCKER CARLSON: “It’s not a crime to criticise genocide in Gaza, it should be a crime to commit genocide in Gaza. Killing kids is worse than criticising the killing of kids.” The fact that Tucker has to say this out loud is INSANE.

TUCKER CARLSON: “It’s not a crime to criticise genocide in Gaza, it should be a crime to commit genocide in Gaza. Killing kids is worse than criticising the killing of kids.” The fact that Tucker has to say this out loud is INSANE.

Stew Peters

369,852 次观看 • 2 个月前

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 次观看 • 7 个月前

Nabeel Qureshi, a former Muslim converted to Christianity, explaining why it is simply erroneous to claim that Islam is a religion of peace: "Muhammad had been fighting from the first year that he could until he died, and he launched Muslims into battle such that they conquered 1/3 of the known world, and then they kept fighting. From that time until the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Muslims had a significant degree of military control throughout the world. It's really hard to say in any way that Islam is a religion of peace when we're talking about physical peace."

Nabeel Qureshi, a former Muslim converted to Christianity, explaining why it is simply erroneous to claim that Islam is a religion of peace: "Muhammad had been fighting from the first year that he could until he died, and he launched Muslims into battle such that they conquered 1/3 of the known world, and then they kept fighting. From that time until the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Muslims had a significant degree of military control throughout the world. It's really hard to say in any way that Islam is a religion of peace when we're talking about physical peace."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

78,557 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

ELON CLIPS

17,166 次观看 • 8 个月前

I agree with Donald J. Trump — Tucker Carlson is not MAGA. First, he demanded all Jews take a DNA test to prove they are Jewish. Then he said Muslim terrorists should be able to rape and kill Americans if they’re under 18 years old. Now, Tucker has threatened a group of Jews who are beloved by everyone in the Jewish community — Chabad.org, who bring light to the world. Who do more acts of kindness in a day than most of us will do in our lives. Tucker falsely claimed they seek the destruction of Muslim holy sites, putting their safety at risk. It is clear that Tucker is not only mentally sick but is a danger to the Jewish Community and America as a whole. It is not enough for us to call out evil among Democrats. We must do it on our own side as well. Tucker Carlson needs to be excommunicated from the Republican Party.

I agree with Donald J. Trump — Tucker Carlson is not MAGA. First, he demanded all Jews take a DNA test to prove they are Jewish. Then he said Muslim terrorists should be able to rape and kill Americans if they’re under 18 years old. Now, Tucker has threatened a group of Jews who are beloved by everyone in the Jewish community — Chabad.org, who bring light to the world. Who do more acts of kindness in a day than most of us will do in our lives. Tucker falsely claimed they seek the destruction of Muslim holy sites, putting their safety at risk. It is clear that Tucker is not only mentally sick but is a danger to the Jewish Community and America as a whole. It is not enough for us to call out evil among Democrats. We must do it on our own side as well. Tucker Carlson needs to be excommunicated from the Republican Party.

Congressman Randy Fine

551,586 次观看 • 6 个月前

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

54,393 次观看 • 11 个月前