Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Indeed it was double fun doing the exact same thing at #ClubOmega last week! 🎬Doppie Sensazioni ⭐️#Sorana Thomas Stone XXX Kalman Otto #threesomefun #threesomeMFM #spitroast #sharing #DP #doublepenetration #hotchick #bestbuddies

Beckett_95

8,607 subscribers

12,263 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #ClubOmega #Sorana #threesomefun #threesomeMFM #spitroast #sharing #DP #doublepenetration #hotchick #bestbuddies

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨The CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmission…. And….. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.—— At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.—— At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.—— At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITION… This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (“Likely”) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said “it’s likely” a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.

Sensitive content

🚨The CCP Had Satelites over Maui (LAHAINA, OLINDA, & KULA), at the EXACT same Time of the Fires!!!! Steve Favis, Computer Science & Advanced Robotics Expert, has compiled sufficient evidence the CCP had multiple satellites capable of an attack above Maui at the same exact time of the fires! He determined the laser would have needed to be in a wave length range to minimize scatter through the atmosphere, so a near infrared range laser would be needed to allow a more precise transmission…. And….. would have minimal reaction to the color BLUE! THE OLINDA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 10:47pm On August 7th.—— At this Exact Time, CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly over this location!!!! Holy shit! THE LAHAINA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 6:37am on August 8th.—— At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD55836 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! THE KULA FIRE Was ignited at approximately at 11:30am on August 8th.—— At this exact time CCP Satellite NORAD53299 was directly this location! HOLY SHIT! Steve Favis also has calculated the CCP has up to 70 Gigawatt lasers in earth orbit right now. IN ADDITION… This is not the first time CCP Satellites have been over Hawaii recently. Back in January of this year, mysterious green lasers were spotted over the skies of Maunakea. The troubling thing is that there were lots of conflicting reports from NASA the first week where they insisted it was one of their satellites, but it was ultimately declared (“Likely”) a Chinese satellite, Daqi-1/AEMS, a week later. This happened almost immediately before multiple Chinese spy balloons were spotted all Over America. The Fact NASA had no clue and said “it’s likely” a Chinese satellite is very alarming. They still to this day only speculate what China was doing.

MJTruthUltra

280,429 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

730,294 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

sharing my guitar progress “BUT WAIT!” you say. “that was exactly the same song you played for us last week…” True. But here is the thing about learning something new: It’s best not to be too proud and keep and open mind and ear out for constructive criticism A single comment, which I easily could have brushed aside, told me to try to put my thumb on the E string and get my other fingers involved in the picking (known as the PIMA method in Spanish guitar parlance) So yeah it set me back, it was frustrating at first But here I am a week later and better for it Old dogs can learn new tricks. But not proud old dogs Humble yourself and learn something new today

sharing my guitar progress “BUT WAIT!” you say. “that was exactly the same song you played for us last week…” True. But here is the thing about learning something new: It’s best not to be too proud and keep and open mind and ear out for constructive criticism A single comment, which I easily could have brushed aside, told me to try to put my thumb on the E string and get my other fingers involved in the picking (known as the PIMA method in Spanish guitar parlance) So yeah it set me back, it was frustrating at first But here I am a week later and better for it Old dogs can learn new tricks. But not proud old dogs Humble yourself and learn something new today

Dan

32,546 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$SPCX BUYERS ARE ABOUT TO LEARN AN IMPORTANT LESSON Here's why This company lost $4.94 billion last year Only one business line actually makes money - Starlink The AI division alone burned through $6 billion The whole thing is priced at $1.75 trillion, almost 90 times revenue Musk holds 85% of the vote on just 42% of the equity None of this matters while everyone still feels like a genius It matters the second euphoria runs out of new buyers Remember my words! I posted SpaceX IPO trap before Day 3 even peaked The structure was clear - same playbook as Tesla 2010, same result incoming What comes next for this stock is the most important move to watch this week Follow now - you'll realize how much you've been missing by not doing it sooner

$SPCX BUYERS ARE ABOUT TO LEARN AN IMPORTANT LESSON Here's why This company lost $4.94 billion last year Only one business line actually makes money - Starlink The AI division alone burned through $6 billion The whole thing is priced at $1.75 trillion, almost 90 times revenue Musk holds 85% of the vote on just 42% of the equity None of this matters while everyone still feels like a genius It matters the second euphoria runs out of new buyers Remember my words! I posted SpaceX IPO trap before Day 3 even peaked The structure was clear - same playbook as Tesla 2010, same result incoming What comes next for this stock is the most important move to watch this week Follow now - you'll realize how much you've been missing by not doing it sooner

bee🐝

167,496 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A guest told Caleb Hammer she was in debt because of the last election. Caleb challenged her reasoning. Caleb Hammer: “So, what’s going on?” Guest: “I’m actually kind of in debt because of the past election.” Caleb Hammer: “Well, at least you acknowledge it. What the… do you possibly mean?” Guest: “Most of my clients are affected by how the economy works.” “My boyfriend’s in construction, and his income has been affected drastically.” Caleb Hammer: “Wouldn’t that have affected his job three or four years ago too… and then gotten a little better for a while?” Guest: “Yes. We were kind of doing okay at that point.” Caleb Hammer: “People think the president has a lot more impact than they do.” “The effects of things like tariffs take time to work through the economy.” “We’re on the same trajectory we’ve been on in terms of job numbers.” “If Kamala was president, would you be saying the exact same thing… that because of the last election you’ve lost money?” Guest: “Probably.” Caleb Hammer: “So, you blame everyone but yourselves.” Guest: “No.”

A guest told Caleb Hammer she was in debt because of the last election. Caleb challenged her reasoning. Caleb Hammer: “So, what’s going on?” Guest: “I’m actually kind of in debt because of the past election.” Caleb Hammer: “Well, at least you acknowledge it. What the… do you possibly mean?” Guest: “Most of my clients are affected by how the economy works.” “My boyfriend’s in construction, and his income has been affected drastically.” Caleb Hammer: “Wouldn’t that have affected his job three or four years ago too… and then gotten a little better for a while?” Guest: “Yes. We were kind of doing okay at that point.” Caleb Hammer: “People think the president has a lot more impact than they do.” “The effects of things like tariffs take time to work through the economy.” “We’re on the same trajectory we’ve been on in terms of job numbers.” “If Kamala was president, would you be saying the exact same thing… that because of the last election you’ve lost money?” Guest: “Probably.” Caleb Hammer: “So, you blame everyone but yourselves.” Guest: “No.”

‏ً

426,162 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Less than a week after an assassin tried to kill the President and the War Secretary, Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton says Pete Hegseth should be executed: Erin Burnett: "Do you believe that the Secretary of Defense is guilty of war crimes?" Moulton: "Absolutely. I mean, he's clearly behind the operation to shoot all these folks in the Caribbean...There's a lot of evidence that these are just fishermen, you know, getting jobs piloting these boats, trying to feed their families...We then have the strike where they came back and hit it again—a double-tap—just purely to kill these survivors who were clinging to wreckage...Back in World War II, the allies tried Nazi submarine captains for doing this exact same thing, and guess what the conclusion was? They got executed. Listen to that, Mr. Secretary!" This violent rhetoric from the left HAS to stop.

Less than a week after an assassin tried to kill the President and the War Secretary, Democrat Rep. Seth Moulton says Pete Hegseth should be executed: Erin Burnett: "Do you believe that the Secretary of Defense is guilty of war crimes?" Moulton: "Absolutely. I mean, he's clearly behind the operation to shoot all these folks in the Caribbean...There's a lot of evidence that these are just fishermen, you know, getting jobs piloting these boats, trying to feed their families...We then have the strike where they came back and hit it again—a double-tap—just purely to kill these survivors who were clinging to wreckage...Back in World War II, the allies tried Nazi submarine captains for doing this exact same thing, and guess what the conclusion was? They got executed. Listen to that, Mr. Secretary!" This violent rhetoric from the left HAS to stop.

Julia 🇺🇸

44,262 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#SEONGHWA about today's stage at the 2025 AAA ⭐️: I felt pressure because I was performing in front of someone who used to be my idol (IU), but since I prepared so hard for it, I did have confidence. But after the performance, I monitored it and in the first line I did one little pitch mistake. At least that’s how it felt for me, so… 🐶: It didn't show~! ⭐️: Yes.. I only realized it after I finished bc I was so immersed in the performance… so yeah, that’s what happened. 🐶: no but that.. ⭐️: it was a bit.. 🐶: everything's okay, it wasn't noticeable! ⭐️: I was a bit embarrassed… I felt embarrassed. 🐶: no.. it's because the members, I'm like that too, but on stage… when I go in, from the very beginning, from the intro, San is like that as well.. everyone looks at me with this sharp, cold gaze. Maybe it's because we all go in with that hyped-up and intense mood, yeah… (Reading a comment) "I was so excited because of the performance that I didn’t notice at all." ⭐️: Mm well, some people might have noticed and some might not, but still… What should I say? 🐶: But your dance break today was really cool, hyung ⭐️: I did my best. I really did my best, but I’ll make up for what was lacking today and show an even better performance tomorrow. 🐶: And today Seonghwa hyung had the center part in the dance break right? Yes, that was cool. ⭐️: Once again, after a long time... I ate well! 🐶: Yes, Seonghwa hyung practiced a lot to perfect the dance break center part. ⭐️: For Man On Fire as well.. that last part 🐶: For this stage hyung got all the dance breaks ⭐️: Oh, that's right.. The Man On Fire dance break was a genre we were doing for the first time back then, so it was a bit difficult. But as we performed it in this concert (tour), I became more familiar with it. Because of that, I think I could do it with a bit more confidence this time. 🐶: Each member has a different vibe when they take the dance center. Doesn't Seonghwa hyung have his own unique vibe? Like, restrained but still leaving that ‘killing part’ kind of vibe? ⭐️: Honestly, I’m still lacking a lot. 🐶: Oh, come on.. each member has their own dance-center vibe, but Seonghwa hyung seems to blend them all together? ⭐️: Like a chameleon, doing all sorts of different things right? 🐶: Yes yes.. that's very charming ⭐️: I really like mimicking the teachers’ dance styles too, so that’s why. Anyway, I had no regrets on stage, I had lots of fun. Also, I was happy to be able to show such a cool stage in front of ATINYs. Receiving the awards was great and it also was really good to perform on such a big stage. Personally, performing in front of seniors I admire was very meaningful. It gave me a bit more motivation. 🐶: That's right, Seonghwa hyung really respects that senior after all. ⭐️: I was so nervous.. 🐶: That’s totally understandable, I’d feel the same way in that situation.

#SEONGHWA about today's stage at the 2025 AAA ⭐️: I felt pressure because I was performing in front of someone who used to be my idol (IU), but since I prepared so hard for it, I did have confidence. But after the performance, I monitored it and in the first line I did one little pitch mistake. At least that’s how it felt for me, so… 🐶: It didn't show~! ⭐️: Yes.. I only realized it after I finished bc I was so immersed in the performance… so yeah, that’s what happened. 🐶: no but that.. ⭐️: it was a bit.. 🐶: everything's okay, it wasn't noticeable! ⭐️: I was a bit embarrassed… I felt embarrassed. 🐶: no.. it's because the members, I'm like that too, but on stage… when I go in, from the very beginning, from the intro, San is like that as well.. everyone looks at me with this sharp, cold gaze. Maybe it's because we all go in with that hyped-up and intense mood, yeah… (Reading a comment) "I was so excited because of the performance that I didn’t notice at all." ⭐️: Mm well, some people might have noticed and some might not, but still… What should I say? 🐶: But your dance break today was really cool, hyung ⭐️: I did my best. I really did my best, but I’ll make up for what was lacking today and show an even better performance tomorrow. 🐶: And today Seonghwa hyung had the center part in the dance break right? Yes, that was cool. ⭐️: Once again, after a long time... I ate well! 🐶: Yes, Seonghwa hyung practiced a lot to perfect the dance break center part. ⭐️: For Man On Fire as well.. that last part 🐶: For this stage hyung got all the dance breaks ⭐️: Oh, that's right.. The Man On Fire dance break was a genre we were doing for the first time back then, so it was a bit difficult. But as we performed it in this concert (tour), I became more familiar with it. Because of that, I think I could do it with a bit more confidence this time. 🐶: Each member has a different vibe when they take the dance center. Doesn't Seonghwa hyung have his own unique vibe? Like, restrained but still leaving that ‘killing part’ kind of vibe? ⭐️: Honestly, I’m still lacking a lot. 🐶: Oh, come on.. each member has their own dance-center vibe, but Seonghwa hyung seems to blend them all together? ⭐️: Like a chameleon, doing all sorts of different things right? 🐶: Yes yes.. that's very charming ⭐️: I really like mimicking the teachers’ dance styles too, so that’s why. Anyway, I had no regrets on stage, I had lots of fun. Also, I was happy to be able to show such a cool stage in front of ATINYs. Receiving the awards was great and it also was really good to perform on such a big stage. Personally, performing in front of seniors I admire was very meaningful. It gave me a bit more motivation. 🐶: That's right, Seonghwa hyung really respects that senior after all. ⭐️: I was so nervous.. 🐶: That’s totally understandable, I’d feel the same way in that situation.

Everything Seonghwa

61,750 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Every person who nailed Jesus to the cross thought they were a pretty good person. The soldiers? Just doing their job. The Pharisees? Protecting the system. Pontius Pilate? Just trying to keep his career on track. They all gave themselves a free pass. And we do the exact same thing. Watch my Palm Sunday reflection to hear why that matters, and why it should change everything about how you enter Holy Week. When we read the Passion at Mass on Palm Sunday, we are forced to say the ugliest lines out loud—"Crucify him!"—because those aren't just ancient words. They're our words, every time we fall into sin. And I'm not saying this to make you feel bad. I'm saying it to make you feel grateful. Because when you see how ugly sin really is, you finally see how far God was willing to go for you. You couldn't pay the price for a single sin. He paid it all. As you enter into Holy Week, stop giving yourself free passes. Look your sin in the face. Take it to confession. And then look at the cross and say thank you. I'll be praying for you.

Every person who nailed Jesus to the cross thought they were a pretty good person. The soldiers? Just doing their job. The Pharisees? Protecting the system. Pontius Pilate? Just trying to keep his career on track. They all gave themselves a free pass. And we do the exact same thing. Watch my Palm Sunday reflection to hear why that matters, and why it should change everything about how you enter Holy Week. When we read the Passion at Mass on Palm Sunday, we are forced to say the ugliest lines out loud—"Crucify him!"—because those aren't just ancient words. They're our words, every time we fall into sin. And I'm not saying this to make you feel bad. I'm saying it to make you feel grateful. Because when you see how ugly sin really is, you finally see how far God was willing to go for you. You couldn't pay the price for a single sin. He paid it all. As you enter into Holy Week, stop giving yourself free passes. Look your sin in the face. Take it to confession. And then look at the cross and say thank you. I'll be praying for you.

Chris Stefanick

22,307 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

#SEONGHWA about walking the runway for SONGZIO today 🩶 ⭐️: Anyway, what I really wanted to say today is that, honestly, walking the runway has always felt like a dream to me. And now, counting this time I’ve done it three times in total, now twice with SONGZIO, which is a brand I really lov, so it made this an even more meaningful time for me. It was such a meaningful experience. While getting ready backstage, all the models were just incredibly cool.. really, so cool. Seeing them gave me a lot of courage and watching how the staff worked was very inspiring as well. In a way it kind of reminded me of ATEEZ in our earlier days, everyone felt close like a family and it was really nice to see. Yes, I learned a lot and felt a lot through this experience. Last time I was only focused on the runway itself, but this time I think I was able to see things more broadly. I think I saw the whole thing with a broader perspective, I learned and felt things. It was truly so much fun. And in those moments I really felt like I was the main character, I really had fun. Originally, during rehearsal, I was second to last. But the CEO started at the very end, and after I finished, I was waiting like this and I was supposed to go in around the final turn. Then suddenly, he changed the positions. So, unexpectedly, I ended up even doing the finale, and it felt so thrilling. At the same time though I worried whether I might somehow be kind of a burden among such amazing models so that (thought) made me study and practice even more. Even though I personally feel there are still many ways I’m lacking, I also found myself thinking that maybe I was able to be part of the story these people were writing through fashion. And that made me feel really proud. #SONGZIOFW25 #성화 #SONGZIO

Everything Seonghwa

25,036 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🔥 Exactly. “ HOW DID THAT SHOOTER KNOW TO GO TO THAT EXACT LOCATION??” - Matt Tardio Spot on and I’ve been wondering the same thing since day 1. The exact event location wasn’t announced til 8/30 a little over a week prior. So I was saying he must have been doing recon days before and that why I said before he was caught him they need to go back a week before the event in the tapes. Also once again how would he HOW CHARLIE KIRKS EVENT AND PRESCISE LOCATION WOULD BE SET UP? So Matt is correct..it would draw attention if he was going there prior. It was AS IF KNEW THE PERFECT SPOT TO BE and it began right after the event had started so ALL EYES WOULD BE FACING FORWARD. Chris Martenson then breaks down how that rifle does not appear are all to be on his pant legs. He shows the ludicrousness of it being in his bag and the both him & Matt agree that this is NOT a rifle that comes apart easily. Matt Tardio notes that a man was arrested in the parking lot with an airsoft rifle. Compound all of this with George Zinn proclaiming he did it as a distraction and you have alot of coincidences. I agree with the guests that because the case is on going j they may not want to disrupt the case but if and when the case is concluded and we do NOT then have answers to these inconsistencies I would be alarmed as well. “I BELIEVE THERE WAS A MUCH LARGER PLOT AT SCHEME HERE” says Matt Tardio and I agree.

🔥 Exactly. “ HOW DID THAT SHOOTER KNOW TO GO TO THAT EXACT LOCATION??” - Matt Tardio Spot on and I’ve been wondering the same thing since day 1. The exact event location wasn’t announced til 8/30 a little over a week prior. So I was saying he must have been doing recon days before and that why I said before he was caught him they need to go back a week before the event in the tapes. Also once again how would he HOW CHARLIE KIRKS EVENT AND PRESCISE LOCATION WOULD BE SET UP? So Matt is correct..it would draw attention if he was going there prior. It was AS IF KNEW THE PERFECT SPOT TO BE and it began right after the event had started so ALL EYES WOULD BE FACING FORWARD. Chris Martenson then breaks down how that rifle does not appear are all to be on his pant legs. He shows the ludicrousness of it being in his bag and the both him & Matt agree that this is NOT a rifle that comes apart easily. Matt Tardio notes that a man was arrested in the parking lot with an airsoft rifle. Compound all of this with George Zinn proclaiming he did it as a distraction and you have alot of coincidences. I agree with the guests that because the case is on going j they may not want to disrupt the case but if and when the case is concluded and we do NOT then have answers to these inconsistencies I would be alarmed as well. “I BELIEVE THERE WAS A MUCH LARGER PLOT AT SCHEME HERE” says Matt Tardio and I agree.

Johnny St.Pete

63,120 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

!! BREAKING !! 25 supporters of Animal Rising have made it onto the track at the Scottish Grand National, to put their bodies in the way of harm, and protect animals. They're attempting to attach themselves to jumps and gates in order to cancel the big race. This afternoon 8 year old Oscar Elite died on the very same track. We take action today with them in our hearts. A horse dies every other day in racing in the UK. We are here to protect horses by saying NO to this barbaric 'sport.' There are plenty of other things we can have fun doing on a Saturday afternoon that don't involve watching animals come to harm. Last week at Aintree was just the beginning. The Summer of Animal Rising is upon us. Please donate to support actions like these: #CancelTheGrandNational #AnimalRising

!! BREAKING !! 25 supporters of Animal Rising have made it onto the track at the Scottish Grand National, to put their bodies in the way of harm, and protect animals. They're attempting to attach themselves to jumps and gates in order to cancel the big race. This afternoon 8 year old Oscar Elite died on the very same track. We take action today with them in our hearts. A horse dies every other day in racing in the UK. We are here to protect horses by saying NO to this barbaric 'sport.' There are plenty of other things we can have fun doing on a Saturday afternoon that don't involve watching animals come to harm. Last week at Aintree was just the beginning. The Summer of Animal Rising is upon us. Please donate to support actions like these: #CancelTheGrandNational #AnimalRising

Animal Rising

361,095 просмотров • 3 лет назад

John Stewart Gets Exposed as a Complete Hypocrite The Daily Show host went after Trump for overvaluing his property — but it turns out he did the exact same thing. The New York Post reports: Jon Stewart benefited by 829% ‘overvalue’ of his NYC home even as he labels Trump’s civil case ‘not victimless’ Comedian Jon Stewart ranted this week that Donald Trump’s civil real-estate case overvaluing his properties was “not victimless,” yet when it came to his own home, Stewart benefited from a similar inflation… But that's not all. In 2014, Stewart sold his 6,280-square-foot Tribeca duplex to financier Parag Pande for $17.5 million. The property’s asking price at that time is not available in listing records. But according to 2013-2014 assessor records obtained by The Post, the property had the estimated market-value at only $1.882 million. The actual assessor valuation was even lower, at $847,174. Records also show that Stewart paid significantly lower property taxes, which were calculated based on that assessor valuation price — precisely what he called Trump out for doing in his Monday monologue. When is Letitia James going to charge John Stewart for this?

John Stewart Gets Exposed as a Complete Hypocrite The Daily Show host went after Trump for overvaluing his property — but it turns out he did the exact same thing. The New York Post reports: Jon Stewart benefited by 829% ‘overvalue’ of his NYC home even as he labels Trump’s civil case ‘not victimless’ Comedian Jon Stewart ranted this week that Donald Trump’s civil real-estate case overvaluing his properties was “not victimless,” yet when it came to his own home, Stewart benefited from a similar inflation… But that's not all. In 2014, Stewart sold his 6,280-square-foot Tribeca duplex to financier Parag Pande for $17.5 million. The property’s asking price at that time is not available in listing records. But according to 2013-2014 assessor records obtained by The Post, the property had the estimated market-value at only $1.882 million. The actual assessor valuation was even lower, at $847,174. Records also show that Stewart paid significantly lower property taxes, which were calculated based on that assessor valuation price — precisely what he called Trump out for doing in his Monday monologue. When is Letitia James going to charge John Stewart for this?

RiftTV

18,039 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Roy makes a very fair point here, I was torn on Green + 100k vs Merrett all week. I literally swapped them back and forth 3-4 times from Fri night to Sat night. He is right, you don’t get that many opportunities to get a top-liner like that and I possibly should’ve taken the chance when it presented, especially with the Ess run. I think Merrett was priced at around 116. If he goes at 125 over the next 5-6 weeks, after adding the Captaincy benefit, it would’ve probably been a mistake to not go him. One thing I was v.surprised with last week was how low down Merrett was on the trade-ins list. It is not often you get an Uber-premium like that who has a juicy upcoming schedule AND is a POD. That’s a very unusual set of circumstances. If your POD premium then goes ham it really can separate your team from the pack. We saw last yr with Zorko what a boost it can be to have a POD premium go large for a big stretch (granted a little diff in the FWDs last yr). That, along with my previously outlined thesis about teams potentially being completed earlier than ever this yr was my bull-case for going Merrett. The reason I went with Green, or rather, why I opted for another option that left me with 100k in the bank is that my bench is a thin. Stone won’t make us much, FOS not looking like he’ll make us much, Berry now been sub 2 games in a row and is dropping cash, Hastie getting subbed each week etc. Other teams that have Moraes instead of Hastie and Hall instead of Berry may have an extra few hundred k to play with in terms of making upgrades. So in light of my weaker bench I felt that the 100k would help facilitate a better subsequent trade (ie this week). Whilst I could downgrade a Prior this week to make a nice upgrade, it wouldn’t be too long before my bench is not sufficient enough to facilitate the next upgrade. So ultimately I was looking at it as a 2 week decision. Ie, would I rather a Merrett + Tom Stewart type this week or would I rather Tom Green + Nick Daicos and ultimately I opted for the latter, though I do feel like I need to fix one of Hastie or Berry this week so we’ll see what I end up doing. But that was the thought process. As stupid as it now sounds, if Dees didn’t tag Holmes the previous week I prob would’ve gone Merrett, but the faint possibility of that happening to Merrett was prob the deciding factor in letting him go. I was also close to trading in Zorko the prev week and seeing Zork do 79 against Richmond spooked me. Didn’t want to run the risk of paying a huge price and then Zerrett underperforming as Zorko did. Can’t say I was thrilled seeing Merrett go nuclear Sat night, esp after the TDK C decision on Sat arvo. But, I can potentially make up the points this week if I’m able to put that 100k to good use.

Roy makes a very fair point here, I was torn on Green + 100k vs Merrett all week. I literally swapped them back and forth 3-4 times from Fri night to Sat night. He is right, you don’t get that many opportunities to get a top-liner like that and I possibly should’ve taken the chance when it presented, especially with the Ess run. I think Merrett was priced at around 116. If he goes at 125 over the next 5-6 weeks, after adding the Captaincy benefit, it would’ve probably been a mistake to not go him. One thing I was v.surprised with last week was how low down Merrett was on the trade-ins list. It is not often you get an Uber-premium like that who has a juicy upcoming schedule AND is a POD. That’s a very unusual set of circumstances. If your POD premium then goes ham it really can separate your team from the pack. We saw last yr with Zorko what a boost it can be to have a POD premium go large for a big stretch (granted a little diff in the FWDs last yr). That, along with my previously outlined thesis about teams potentially being completed earlier than ever this yr was my bull-case for going Merrett. The reason I went with Green, or rather, why I opted for another option that left me with 100k in the bank is that my bench is a thin. Stone won’t make us much, FOS not looking like he’ll make us much, Berry now been sub 2 games in a row and is dropping cash, Hastie getting subbed each week etc. Other teams that have Moraes instead of Hastie and Hall instead of Berry may have an extra few hundred k to play with in terms of making upgrades. So in light of my weaker bench I felt that the 100k would help facilitate a better subsequent trade (ie this week). Whilst I could downgrade a Prior this week to make a nice upgrade, it wouldn’t be too long before my bench is not sufficient enough to facilitate the next upgrade. So ultimately I was looking at it as a 2 week decision. Ie, would I rather a Merrett + Tom Stewart type this week or would I rather Tom Green + Nick Daicos and ultimately I opted for the latter, though I do feel like I need to fix one of Hastie or Berry this week so we’ll see what I end up doing. But that was the thought process. As stupid as it now sounds, if Dees didn’t tag Holmes the previous week I prob would’ve gone Merrett, but the faint possibility of that happening to Merrett was prob the deciding factor in letting him go. I was also close to trading in Zorko the prev week and seeing Zork do 79 against Richmond spooked me. Didn’t want to run the risk of paying a huge price and then Zerrett underperforming as Zorko did. Can’t say I was thrilled seeing Merrett go nuclear Sat night, esp after the TDK C decision on Sat arvo. But, I can potentially make up the points this week if I’m able to put that 100k to good use.

Vams

10,940 просмотров • 1 год назад

DSP on if Asmongold will be making an appearance during his birthday bash "Idk and to be frank w u, I don’t really care..I don't have any guests coming on the show..not what this was supposed to be about, this was supposed to be a nice chill day where we just hang out" "I haven't spoke to Asmongold..outside of me doing the public thing last week, which u guys wanted me to do, and him responding saying he may come on or not..idk, I haven't spoken w him at all" "I haven't even set it up..I can have to pause for 10 minutes to set it up..but idc..if he wants to come on..great..if not, it's not a big deal..I'll be drinking & playing games & having fun w u guys, that's what I want today to be"

DSP on if Asmongold will be making an appearance during his birthday bash "Idk and to be frank w u, I don’t really care..I don't have any guests coming on the show..not what this was supposed to be about, this was supposed to be a nice chill day where we just hang out" "I haven't spoke to Asmongold..outside of me doing the public thing last week, which u guys wanted me to do, and him responding saying he may come on or not..idk, I haven't spoken w him at all" "I haven't even set it up..I can have to pause for 10 minutes to set it up..but idc..if he wants to come on..great..if not, it's not a big deal..I'll be drinking & playing games & having fun w u guys, that's what I want today to be"

yeet

41,344 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

American had a 6 hour surgery for a medical device implant. He was only told the device cost about $40k, but then he started getting more bills he was never told about “Last night I got a notification on my phone going Blue Cross Blue Shield processed a claim. Would you like to view it, I'm like, yeah, of course. I want to see what's going on. So I open it up, and it is a claim for $149,800 and some change, $150 grand. Holy crap” “So over the past week or so, I received bills from - The surgeon, which is just a little over $30k - The device was about $40k - The anesthesiologist was just over $20k. - Then last night, I haven't received a bill from the hospital — Same day surgery, in and out. I was under for about six hours, though. So the procedure was about six hours for $149,800 and some change. So $150 grand. So in my brain, I'm doing some quick math and I'm. I'm like, this $40,000 device has now turned into a little over $220,000. I was like, the only thing running through my brain at this time is like, America… Healthcare in America. What has happened? Where the wheels have fallen off the rails on the cost of care in America.” “What do y' all think? $220 grand for a $40,000 device. Crazy. Absolutely crazy. America.”

American had a 6 hour surgery for a medical device implant. He was only told the device cost about $40k, but then he started getting more bills he was never told about “Last night I got a notification on my phone going Blue Cross Blue Shield processed a claim. Would you like to view it, I'm like, yeah, of course. I want to see what's going on. So I open it up, and it is a claim for $149,800 and some change, $150 grand. Holy crap” “So over the past week or so, I received bills from - The surgeon, which is just a little over $30k - The device was about $40k - The anesthesiologist was just over $20k. - Then last night, I haven't received a bill from the hospital — Same day surgery, in and out. I was under for about six hours, though. So the procedure was about six hours for $149,800 and some change. So $150 grand. So in my brain, I'm doing some quick math and I'm. I'm like, this $40,000 device has now turned into a little over $220,000. I was like, the only thing running through my brain at this time is like, America… Healthcare in America. What has happened? Where the wheels have fallen off the rails on the cost of care in America.” “What do y' all think? $220 grand for a $40,000 device. Crazy. Absolutely crazy. America.”

Wall Street Apes

278,386 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"I would love if it was that simplistic. Oh, it's NATO versus BRICS. NATO are bad, so BRICS are good. Yay! Let's support the BRICS. They'll win this fight in the end, and then we'll all live in harmony. I'd like to believe that. I mean, it would be nice if it were true, but it is not true. Demonstrably not true. I've talked about this over and over and over in many different contexts. I've talked about the...BRICS phony opposition...how all of the key positions in things like the New Development Bank and other institutions, BRICS counter institutions to the US, NATO-led institutions like the World Bank, etc...it turns out that they're all populated by the same people who are serving on...over here, and then they serve over here, and they're serving the same agenda. Everything you look at, it turns out it's actually the same thing underneath. On New World next week, last week, me and James Evan Pilato were talking about the digital IDs that the UK is rolling out and that is happening, of course, everywhere else in the world right now. And as I pointed out, well, guess what? Russia just unveiling their digital ID through the Max app or something like that. Anyway, it's the exact same thing. And again, if what we are fighting against is this technocratic top-down control, how on earth is China going to save us from that? That is the paradigm. That is the paragon of technocratic top-down control and surveillance of society. That is what it is predicated on. So they're not going to save you from that agenda. They are that agenda. So yeah, no, we're not going to look to these political saviors. We're not going to look to nation states to save us from this. It's going to come from us or it's not going to happen." James Corbett of 🌎🌏 🔗

"I would love if it was that simplistic. Oh, it's NATO versus BRICS. NATO are bad, so BRICS are good. Yay! Let's support the BRICS. They'll win this fight in the end, and then we'll all live in harmony. I'd like to believe that. I mean, it would be nice if it were true, but it is not true. Demonstrably not true. I've talked about this over and over and over in many different contexts. I've talked about the...BRICS phony opposition...how all of the key positions in things like the New Development Bank and other institutions, BRICS counter institutions to the US, NATO-led institutions like the World Bank, etc...it turns out that they're all populated by the same people who are serving on...over here, and then they serve over here, and they're serving the same agenda. Everything you look at, it turns out it's actually the same thing underneath. On New World next week, last week, me and James Evan Pilato were talking about the digital IDs that the UK is rolling out and that is happening, of course, everywhere else in the world right now. And as I pointed out, well, guess what? Russia just unveiling their digital ID through the Max app or something like that. Anyway, it's the exact same thing. And again, if what we are fighting against is this technocratic top-down control, how on earth is China going to save us from that? That is the paradigm. That is the paragon of technocratic top-down control and surveillance of society. That is what it is predicated on. So they're not going to save you from that agenda. They are that agenda. So yeah, no, we're not going to look to these political saviors. We're not going to look to nation states to save us from this. It's going to come from us or it's not going to happen." James Corbett of 🌎🌏 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

34,070 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

👼🏼👹 Pasulka: It Could Be Angels and Demons 👹👼🏼 This segment was really good. Excellent job, Diana! Force dwpasulka (DP) to make a bet on what the phenomenon represents, and she'd say... DP: "It's a variety of things." Ross Douthat (RD): "It's more than one thing?" DP: "It appears to be." RD: "Okay. Give me two examples of what that thing is. It's a variety, just two. Two different things. What is it?" DP: "It appears to be a perennial thing (lasting or existing for a long or apparently infinite time). So there appears to be something that interfaces with humans, and has been identified in the various traditional religions." RD: "Identified as what?" DP: "Well, I'm not going to name it, because in some traditional religions it's named in different ways. So it could be bodhisattvas, angels, demons, things like that." (A Bodhisattvas is, "a being that compassionately refrains from entering nirvana in order to save others and is worshipped as a deity in Mahayana Buddhism." ~Merriam-Webster) RD: "No, that's good. So it is intermediate intelligences between God and human beings, some of whom have our best interests at heart and some of whom don't?" DP: "And those different religious traditions have protocols for dealing with these." RD: "But that was a yes? You agree. That's part of what you think it is?" DP: "I think some of the phenomena is that, not all of it. Then there appears to be some type of technology that is either, in my opinion - this is the truth serum, in my opinion - either is ours, or if it's not ours, it's amazing." RD: "So in that theory, you would have a kind of loop of, on the one hand, authentic experiences that map onto the great religious traditions, and at the same time, some kind of government cover up or secrecy around remarkable technologies that we aren't aware of. Are those two things linked, or is it just a marriage of convenience, then? That the government is happy that people have these kind of supernatural experiences because it makes it easier to cover up the amazing technology?" DP: "Yeah, that's the question I ask myself. I don't know if they're linked (laughs)." (I suspect that they're linked. At this point in time, my leading theory is that what we're experiencing is what people in ancient times referred to as Angels, Demons, Jinn, etc., but it has nothing to do with evil, which is a human label. I just think it's part of the natural, non-physical world that we usually can't perceive. And some of it may be helpful to humans and some of it is harmful. Seems like the harmful is more prevalent. Either we just get in the way and it doesn't care if we get hurt, or us getting hurt is somehow beneficial to it. Like, we're a resource somehow. Just like how we see cows, pigs and chickens. And I think it may have the ability to create what looks like technology. Materialize and dematerialize "stuff." And also, we may have our own tech that we back engineered from "their" tech or developed on our own. Just opinions.) RD: "All right, so last question, because you have been trying to pull me away from the government and back towards the personal experiences and so on. What can, you know, nice secular readers of The New York Times who have been baffled by this conversation (laughs), let's say, take away from the personal side of it, the direct encounters that people report having?" DP: "Okay. So I think what's really important is that most of us grew up with and were educated within this worldview, and I call it the Thomas-Jefferson worldview. And Thomas Jefferson didn't believe that Jesus was divine. He believed that Jesus was a really good person. And he even went so far as to rewrite the New Testament, and he took out all the references to miracles and all the things that, you know, all the references to angels and demons and exorcisms and healings and things like that. And there was the Jeffersonian Bible, okay? "So, I would say that, for me, what these experiences did was it... I was a, you know, I had a Jeffersonian worldview. I was a secular Catholic, okay? What these these experiences did was they jolted me out of that worldview and into the Shakespearean worldview. Where, you know, there are things that we don't understand, and why don't we, you know, understand that we don't understand them? Instead of just doing like the Wall Street Journal did, and just say 'No, nothing to see here.' Well, the world and the cosmos is a really beautiful place with a lot of mystery. So that's what I would suggest." (Well said, and I appreciate the shot at the WSJ.) RD: "Okay, I endorse that take very strongly. I'm gonna give you one more chance to tell me who it was who told you they had seen an alien spacecraft and where? Because, you know, it's the New York Times. It's an audience of at least dozens, if not millions. Don't you want to be the person who blew the lid off, you know, the secret government conspiracy, Diana?" DP: "No, I don't aspire to that." (Both laugh)

👼🏼👹 Pasulka: It Could Be Angels and Demons 👹👼🏼 This segment was really good. Excellent job, Diana! Force dwpasulka (DP) to make a bet on what the phenomenon represents, and she'd say... DP: "It's a variety of things." Ross Douthat (RD): "It's more than one thing?" DP: "It appears to be." RD: "Okay. Give me two examples of what that thing is. It's a variety, just two. Two different things. What is it?" DP: "It appears to be a perennial thing (lasting or existing for a long or apparently infinite time). So there appears to be something that interfaces with humans, and has been identified in the various traditional religions." RD: "Identified as what?" DP: "Well, I'm not going to name it, because in some traditional religions it's named in different ways. So it could be bodhisattvas, angels, demons, things like that." (A Bodhisattvas is, "a being that compassionately refrains from entering nirvana in order to save others and is worshipped as a deity in Mahayana Buddhism." ~Merriam-Webster) RD: "No, that's good. So it is intermediate intelligences between God and human beings, some of whom have our best interests at heart and some of whom don't?" DP: "And those different religious traditions have protocols for dealing with these." RD: "But that was a yes? You agree. That's part of what you think it is?" DP: "I think some of the phenomena is that, not all of it. Then there appears to be some type of technology that is either, in my opinion - this is the truth serum, in my opinion - either is ours, or if it's not ours, it's amazing." RD: "So in that theory, you would have a kind of loop of, on the one hand, authentic experiences that map onto the great religious traditions, and at the same time, some kind of government cover up or secrecy around remarkable technologies that we aren't aware of. Are those two things linked, or is it just a marriage of convenience, then? That the government is happy that people have these kind of supernatural experiences because it makes it easier to cover up the amazing technology?" DP: "Yeah, that's the question I ask myself. I don't know if they're linked (laughs)." (I suspect that they're linked. At this point in time, my leading theory is that what we're experiencing is what people in ancient times referred to as Angels, Demons, Jinn, etc., but it has nothing to do with evil, which is a human label. I just think it's part of the natural, non-physical world that we usually can't perceive. And some of it may be helpful to humans and some of it is harmful. Seems like the harmful is more prevalent. Either we just get in the way and it doesn't care if we get hurt, or us getting hurt is somehow beneficial to it. Like, we're a resource somehow. Just like how we see cows, pigs and chickens. And I think it may have the ability to create what looks like technology. Materialize and dematerialize "stuff." And also, we may have our own tech that we back engineered from "their" tech or developed on our own. Just opinions.) RD: "All right, so last question, because you have been trying to pull me away from the government and back towards the personal experiences and so on. What can, you know, nice secular readers of The New York Times who have been baffled by this conversation (laughs), let's say, take away from the personal side of it, the direct encounters that people report having?" DP: "Okay. So I think what's really important is that most of us grew up with and were educated within this worldview, and I call it the Thomas-Jefferson worldview. And Thomas Jefferson didn't believe that Jesus was divine. He believed that Jesus was a really good person. And he even went so far as to rewrite the New Testament, and he took out all the references to miracles and all the things that, you know, all the references to angels and demons and exorcisms and healings and things like that. And there was the Jeffersonian Bible, okay? "So, I would say that, for me, what these experiences did was it... I was a, you know, I had a Jeffersonian worldview. I was a secular Catholic, okay? What these these experiences did was they jolted me out of that worldview and into the Shakespearean worldview. Where, you know, there are things that we don't understand, and why don't we, you know, understand that we don't understand them? Instead of just doing like the Wall Street Journal did, and just say 'No, nothing to see here.' Well, the world and the cosmos is a really beautiful place with a lot of mystery. So that's what I would suggest." (Well said, and I appreciate the shot at the WSJ.) RD: "Okay, I endorse that take very strongly. I'm gonna give you one more chance to tell me who it was who told you they had seen an alien spacecraft and where? Because, you know, it's the New York Times. It's an audience of at least dozens, if not millions. Don't you want to be the person who blew the lid off, you know, the secret government conspiracy, Diana?" DP: "No, I don't aspire to that." (Both laugh)

Joe Murgia

23,954 просмотров • 1 год назад

Marc Andreessen went on Chris Williamson's podcast and broke down exactly how Elon Musk runs multiple companies at once No other CEO on Earth does this: 1. Every week, Musk shows up at each of his companies, identifies the single biggest problem that company is having that week, and fixes it. Then he does that for 52 weeks in a row. At the end of the year, each company has solved its 52 biggest problems. Meanwhile, most large companies are still having the planning meeting for the pre-planning meeting for the board presentation with the compliance review and the legal review attached. 2. This is not a new operating method. It is actually how the great industrialists of the late 1800s and early 1900s ran their companies. Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Watson, who built IBM. Total devotion from the leader to fully and deeply understand what the company does, be in the trenches, talk directly to the people doing the work, and be the lead problem solver in the organization. Andreessen says he is not aware of another current CEO who operates this way. 3. The framework Musk uses is the bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always one thing holding everything up. Sometimes it is raw materials at the start. Sometimes it is warehousing at the end. Sometimes it is in the middle. The job is to find it and remove it. Musk has universalized this concept across every company he runs. In any given week, there is one main bottleneck. He micromanages the solution to that one thing and delegates almost everything else. 4. Musk delegates almost everything. Andreessen is clear about this. He is not involved in most of what his companies are doing. He is involved in the one thing that is the biggest problem right now. Once that is fixed, he moves to the next biggest problem. Everything else by definition, is running better than the bottleneck, so it does not need him. 5. When Musk identifies the bottleneck, he goes directly to the engineer who actually understands it. not the VP of engineering, not the director, not the manager. The individual contributor who has the actual technical knowledge. He sits in the room with that person and fixes the problem alongside them. He does not ask for a report to be reviewed in three weeks. he shows up at the keyboard or on the manufacturing line and works through it overnight if necessary. 6. This is why technical people who work for Musk say it was the best experience of their lives. Andreessen's framing: if you are stuck on a problem you cannot solve, Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream, sit with you in front of the keyboard, and help you figure it out. For an engineer who genuinely cares about the work, that is an almost incomprehensible level of support from the CEO of the company. 7. Business school teaches the opposite of this: management as a generic skill applicable to any industry. Soup company or a rocket company, the management principles are the same. process, balance sheet, meeting schedules, compliance, executive motivation, interpersonal conflict resolution. Andreessen says those skills are useful in many contexts. They just give you nothing; you need to do what Musk does. And Musk pushes as far as he can away from all of that so he can spend all of his time doing the things only he can do.

Marc Andreessen went on Chris Williamson's podcast and broke down exactly how Elon Musk runs multiple companies at once No other CEO on Earth does this: 1. Every week, Musk shows up at each of his companies, identifies the single biggest problem that company is having that week, and fixes it. Then he does that for 52 weeks in a row. At the end of the year, each company has solved its 52 biggest problems. Meanwhile, most large companies are still having the planning meeting for the pre-planning meeting for the board presentation with the compliance review and the legal review attached. 2. This is not a new operating method. It is actually how the great industrialists of the late 1800s and early 1900s ran their companies. Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Watson, who built IBM. Total devotion from the leader to fully and deeply understand what the company does, be in the trenches, talk directly to the people doing the work, and be the lead problem solver in the organization. Andreessen says he is not aware of another current CEO who operates this way. 3. The framework Musk uses is the bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always one thing holding everything up. Sometimes it is raw materials at the start. Sometimes it is warehousing at the end. Sometimes it is in the middle. The job is to find it and remove it. Musk has universalized this concept across every company he runs. In any given week, there is one main bottleneck. He micromanages the solution to that one thing and delegates almost everything else. 4. Musk delegates almost everything. Andreessen is clear about this. He is not involved in most of what his companies are doing. He is involved in the one thing that is the biggest problem right now. Once that is fixed, he moves to the next biggest problem. Everything else by definition, is running better than the bottleneck, so it does not need him. 5. When Musk identifies the bottleneck, he goes directly to the engineer who actually understands it. not the VP of engineering, not the director, not the manager. The individual contributor who has the actual technical knowledge. He sits in the room with that person and fixes the problem alongside them. He does not ask for a report to be reviewed in three weeks. he shows up at the keyboard or on the manufacturing line and works through it overnight if necessary. 6. This is why technical people who work for Musk say it was the best experience of their lives. Andreessen's framing: if you are stuck on a problem you cannot solve, Elon Musk is going to show up in his Gulfstream, sit with you in front of the keyboard, and help you figure it out. For an engineer who genuinely cares about the work, that is an almost incomprehensible level of support from the CEO of the company. 7. Business school teaches the opposite of this: management as a generic skill applicable to any industry. Soup company or a rocket company, the management principles are the same. process, balance sheet, meeting schedules, compliance, executive motivation, interpersonal conflict resolution. Andreessen says those skills are useful in many contexts. They just give you nothing; you need to do what Musk does. And Musk pushes as far as he can away from all of that so he can spend all of his time doing the things only he can do.

Jaynit

271,301 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

For 726 days, the staff at Riverbend Animal Shelter in Memphis kept the same note in Brutus's file, updated over and over without ever needing to change: "No tail wag. Ever. Not once. " He wasn't aggressive. He wasn't fearful in the way people expected. He simply existed in his kennel like he'd already accepted that this was the rest of his life, watching hundreds of people walk past his cage, watching hundreds of other dogs get picked while he never so much as lifted his head to hope. Then on an ordinary Thursday morning last April, Earl Giddens walked through the shelter doors without any real plan to adopt. His wife had sent him just to look, just to pass an afternoon, nothing more serious than that. He wandered the aisles the way most visitors do, until he stopped in front of Brutus's kennel. Shelter director Rosa Muniz happened to be watching from the doorway at that exact moment, the way she'd watched thousands of visitors before him. What she saw next stopped her cold. "I've been doing this for nineteen years, "Rosa said. "I've never seen that dog's tail move." But it moved. For Earl, after 726 days of nothing, it moved. Earl didn't leave to think it over. He didn't come back next week. He drove home with Brutus that same afternoon, the two of them starting something neither one had gone looking for that morning. Some people carry the right kind of quiet, the kind that finally makes another creature feel safe enough to hope again. What do you think it was about Earl that finally reached him?

For 726 days, the staff at Riverbend Animal Shelter in Memphis kept the same note in Brutus's file, updated over and over without ever needing to change: "No tail wag. Ever. Not once. " He wasn't aggressive. He wasn't fearful in the way people expected. He simply existed in his kennel like he'd already accepted that this was the rest of his life, watching hundreds of people walk past his cage, watching hundreds of other dogs get picked while he never so much as lifted his head to hope. Then on an ordinary Thursday morning last April, Earl Giddens walked through the shelter doors without any real plan to adopt. His wife had sent him just to look, just to pass an afternoon, nothing more serious than that. He wandered the aisles the way most visitors do, until he stopped in front of Brutus's kennel. Shelter director Rosa Muniz happened to be watching from the doorway at that exact moment, the way she'd watched thousands of visitors before him. What she saw next stopped her cold. "I've been doing this for nineteen years, "Rosa said. "I've never seen that dog's tail move." But it moved. For Earl, after 726 days of nothing, it moved. Earl didn't leave to think it over. He didn't come back next week. He drove home with Brutus that same afternoon, the two of them starting something neither one had gone looking for that morning. Some people carry the right kind of quiet, the kind that finally makes another creature feel safe enough to hope again. What do you think it was about Earl that finally reached him?

Crazy Moments

84,033 просмотров • 29 дней назад