Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🇮🇳🇮🇷 India needs to develop triple-layer defence after AWACS shock in Iran "AWACS are now too vulnerable — Iran has already shot one down," Major General Rajan Kochhar (retd.) told Sputnik India. Future defense needs a triple shield: ◾️AWACS ◾️UAVs ◾️Satellite system

64,294 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Footage of joint Russian-Iranian drills just two weeks ago, February 19, 2026. When Iran turned to Putin for help, it was refused, even though Russia called Iran an important ally and signed a strategic partnership agreement with it a year ago. Russia used Iran as a tool to put pressure on the West and destabilize the region: ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with thousands of Shahed-136 attack drones and technology for their production on Russian territory under the name "Geran-2." ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with short-range ballistic missiles. The total value of contracts for the supply of missiles and drones at the beginning of 2023 was estimated at $1.75-3 billion. ◾️ In return, Russia supplied its own weapons to Iran, including air defense systems and aircraft, which, as we can see, did not help Tehran. ◾️ Russia helped Iran develop its nuclear program to increase instability in the region and strengthen the "anti-Western coalition." ◾️ Using its influence, Russia maintained its military bases in Syria and shared military expenses with Tehran. ◾️ Iran, which has been under sanctions for decades, helped Russia circumvent sanctions: the development of the North-South Transport Corridor through Iran allowed Russia to export goods bypassing European ports. ◾️ Iran helped Russia master methods of covert financial transactions and parallel imports. Russia's main objective now is destabilization in the region, prolonging the war, driving up oil prices, and diverting financial and military aid away from Ukraine. ‼️ It is likely that Russians helped Iran develop a plan for strikes against the Persian Gulf countries. It is only natural that Ukrainians are now being asked for help in defending against Iranian drones. Ukraine has unique experience in countering Shahed drones. And Ukraine knows very well what Russia is like, what methods it uses, and what its goals are. What finally needs to be understood about Russia is that it has never been a reliable partner! Its partnership is rhetorical. Russia pursues exclusively its own interests, setting up, deceiving, and abandoning its so-called allies and violating the terms of agreements and deals. Syria, Venezuela, and Iran are vivid examples of this. 📹: Russia-Iran drills/Radio Liberty

Anton Gerashchenko

169,919 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Some key statements of the President of Ukraine at the World Economic Forum 2026 yesterday: ◾️ "Just last year, here in Davos, I ended my speech with the words: 'Europe needs to know how to defend itself.' A year has passed - and nothing has changed. We are still in a situation where I must say the same words." ◾️ "Maduro is on trial in New York. Sorry, but Putin is not on trial. And this is the fourth year of the biggest war in Europe since World War II - and the man who started it is not only free, he's still fighting for his frozen money in Europe." ◾️ "Why can President Trump stop tankers from the Shadow Fleet and seize oil - but Europe doesn't? Russian oil is being transported right along European shores. That oil funds the war against Ukraine. That oil helps destabilize Europe. So Russian oil must be stopped and confiscated, and sold for Europe's benefit. Why not? If Putin has no money, there's no war for Europe. If Europe has money, then it can protect its people." ◾️ "If Russian warships are sailing freely around Greenland, Ukraine can help - we have the expertise and weapons to ensure not one of those ships remains. They can sink near Greenland just as they do near Crimea. For us, the sea is not the first line of defense, so we can take actions, and we know how to fight there. If we were asked, and if Ukraine were in NATO - but we are not - we would solve this problem with the Russian ships." ◾️ "Europe needs to know how to defend itself. If you send 30 or 40 soldiers to Greenland - what is that for? What message does it send? What’s the message to Putin? To China? And even more importantly, what message does it send to Denmark - the most important - your close ally?" ◾️ "There's still no real progress on establishing a Special Tribunal for Russian aggression against Ukraine, against the Ukrainian people. Europe hasn't reached even the point of having a home for the Tribunal. Too often in Europe, something else is always more urgent than justice." ◾️"There was so much talk about the protests in Iran - but they drowned in blood. The world has not helped the Iranian people enough. And what will Iran become after this bloodshed? If the regime survives, it sends a clear signal to every bully: kill enough people, and you stay in power." ◾️ "Europe needs united armed forces - forces that can truly defend Europe. Today, Europe relies only on the belief that if danger comes, NATO will act. But no one has really seen the Alliance in action. If Putin decides to take Lithuania or strike Poland, who will respond? Right now, NATO exists thanks to the belief that the United States will act, that it will not stand aside, and will help. But what if it doesn't?" ◾️ "When you refuse to help people fighting for freedom, the consequences return - and they're always negative. Belarus in 2020 is an example. No one helped their people. And now, Russian Oreshnik missiles are deployed in Belarus - within range of most European capitals. That would not have happened if the Belarusian people had won in 2020."

Anton Gerashchenko

13,342 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Limiting the size of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to 800,000 troops is acceptable for Ukraine, AFU's Commander-in-Chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, said. "It really guarantees repelling armed aggression in case of its resumption. This figure also guarantees a planned mobilization process. At first, we were offered to reduce the number of our servicemen to 600,000. But we are satisfied with the figure of 800,000," he said in an interview with Channel 24. Other statements by the Commander-in-Chief: ◾️ Russia planned to fully achieve all the goals of the so-called 'SMO' this year. The plans were grandiose. But we can now state that they did not come to fruition; they were thwarted. The enemy suffered enormous losses. ◾️ We see a change in the structure of the war and its rise to a higher technological level. We observe that the war has become so technologically advanced that drones of all types now dominate the battlefield. Their quantity and quality have increased. ◾️ Russians planned to form 14 new divisions this year. They only managed to form 7, with two marine divisions consisting of only one regiment. They were forced to take these divisions' personnel and redistribute them into battle units. This confirms that they really do have problems recruiting people. ◾️ I recently met with the Chief of the Defense Staff of the UK and the Chief of the General Staff of France. So, the vector has changed. We are being asked to help train their armies and their units. I believe this is the highest praise, when it is no longer us asking, but others turning to us. I am told that we are the first in Europe, and probably in the world. ◾️ Some people are shouting about the insane advance of Russian troops deep into [Ukrainian] territory. Insane advance... Is 4.5 kilometers a month an insane advance, when the enemy pays for it every day with thousands of the lives of its soldiers? ◾️ A contract system has been developed whereby a serviceman who signs a contract with very flexible terms will receive a decent money allowance. It is at least three times higher than the current established level. At the same time, additional payments, bonuses, and financial support will be preserved. ◾️ The mission of our Armed Forces remains unchanged: to defend our homeland, its territory and borders, and to destroy the enemy.

Anton Gerashchenko

65,857 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

When President Trump talks about a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz as a way to "kill Iran's economy," we need to remember who stands behind Iran's resilience. Above all, it is China, and not only as a buyer of oil, but as a strategic partner that benefits from Iran remaining a destabilizing force in the Middle East. Russia, of course, as well, but Russia is bogged down in Ukraine. Iran is a tool. For China, Iran serves one simple purpose: to keep the Middle East in a state of chronic instability, which costs the US money, attention, and reputation. ◾️ First, the Iran war is pulling American potential away from Asia right now. The US has deployed the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, two destroyers, two naval task forces, and Patriot and THAAD systems to the Middle East, depleting its stockpile of Tomahawk cruise missiles, which are critical for a potential Taiwan scenario. ◾️ Second, the crisis translates into a blow to the American authority and concessions. Every Middle Eastern war weakens the trust of Asian allies in the United States. Japan and South Korea are already experiencing delays in deliveries of ordered US weapons. Taiwan is watching as Washington trades off its security for the sake of a summit with Beijing: Trump delayed a multi-billion-dollar arms package to Taiwan so as not to jeopardize the summit with President Xi. ◾️ Third, China is the sole beneficiary of the oil blockade of Iran. Despite sanctions, Iran earned $54 billion in 2022 and $53 billion in 2023. Where does this oil go? To China. More than 90% of Iranian oil exports are absorbed by the Chinese market, primarily through networks of small independent oil refineries in Shandong province. The scheme is worked out down to the last detail. Iranian tankers turn off their transponders, transfer oil "ship-to-ship" off the coast of Malaysia, relabel the cargo as Malaysian or Indonesian, and settle payments in yuan through small banks outside the dollar infrastructure. In 2025, these shadow tankers made over 1,500 voyages from Iran to China. ◾️ Fourth, Iran is increasingly serving as a testing ground for China's indirect military-technical support. According to US officials, the Chinese company SMIC supplied Iranian military structures with equipment for chip production and, likely, technical training. Ships carrying sodium perchlorate - a key component of solid rocket fuel - were set to depart from Chinese ports. Iran was also nearing a deal to purchase Chinese CM-302 supersonic anti-ship missiles, which pose a direct threat to US ships in the Gulf. And US intelligence is now recording possible preparations to transfer MANPADS to Iran via third countries. Some claims regarding deeper support, particularly concerning BeiDou and Chinese air defense systems, remain disputed, but the overall direction is clear: China is helping Iran not only survive under pressure but also raise the cost of the US military presence in the region. Therefore, a US blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is not pointless in terms of pressuring Iran, as it could physically cut off a significant portion of exports that ultimately go to China. But it is a crude instrument: it hurts not only Iran and China, but the entire energy system of the region, global prices, and US allies. That is precisely why this move is both powerful and strategically toxic.

Anton Gerashchenko

73,700 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇮🇷🇵🇰|Pakistan’s PM Met Iran’s President. Pakistan Is Not a US Ally. It Is a Survivor State. Shehbaz Sharif sat down with Masoud Pezeshkian on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. The official readout will say “bilateral relations” and “regional developments.” The truth is simpler: Pakistan is trying to avoid being forced to choose sides in a war that is tearing the region apart. And it is failing. Pakistan is not Iran. It is not a member of the Resistance Axis. It does not fire missiles at Israel. It does not control a strategic strait. It does not have 33 million people registered for a martyrdom campaign. But Pakistan is not a US colony either. It does not host permanent US combat bases. It does not follow every American sanction. It has not closed its airspace to Iranian flights. It has not joined the naval blockade. It has not sent troops to Yemen. Pakistan is a survivor state. It has survived wars, coups, floods, earthquakes, economic collapse, and the constant pressure of being a nuclear-armed country surrounded by hostile neighbors and unreliable allies. It has learned one lesson above all: do not choose sides unless you have to. And right now, it is being forced to choose. The American Squeeze The US Treasury has threatened to cut off any country that services Iranian aircraft from the dollar system. Pakistan has not complied. It has not banned Iranian flights. It has not closed its airspace. It has not joined the blockade. Why? Because Pakistan needs Iran. It needs Iranian gas. It needs border trade. It needs the land route to Central Asia. It needs a neighbor that is not India. It needs Iran to help manage the border with Afghanistan. It needs Iran to keep the Balochistan insurgency from spilling over. But Pakistan also needs the US. It needs the IMF. It needs American military aid. It needs American diplomatic support on Kashmir. It needs American intelligence on Afghanistan. It needs the American market for its textiles. So Pakistan is caught in the middle. It cannot fully comply with the US. It cannot fully defy the US. It is trying to do what it always does: balance. The Iranian Demand Iran wants Pakistan to do two things: 1. Dismantle Jaish al-Adl’s safe havens in Balochistan. That group launches attacks into Iranian Sistan-Baluchestan from Pakistani soil. Iran has already proven it can strike inside Pakistan when it needs to. Pakistan knows this. 2. Guarantee safe passage for its oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz. Pakistan’s economy is on life support. Its fuel reserves are measured in days. It cannot afford a closure. Iran’s message to Pakistan is clear: You cannot be a base for our enemies and a friend of ours at the same time. If you want our gas, our border trade, and our help on Afghanistan, you need to act against Jaish al-Adl. You need to stop letting your territory be used to kill our border guards. Pakistan’s response is always the same: We are doing our best. We are a weak state. We have our own problems. Please be patient. Iran is tired of patience. The Meeting at UNGA Shehbaz Sharif met Pezeshkian in New York. What did they discuss? ◾Border security. Iran pressed for action against Jaish al-Adl. Pakistan promised to do more. ◾Economic cooperation. Pakistan asked for Iranian gas, electricity, and border trade. Iran asked for payment in something other than rupees. ◾Afghanistan. Both countries are worried about ISIS-K, drug trafficking, and refugee flows. They agreed to coordinate. ◾ The US blockade. Pakistan said it would not join the aviation blockade. Iran thanked it. ◾The Strait of Hormuz. Pakistan asked for safe passage. Iran said it would consider it if Pakistan acted against Jaish al-Adl. No breakthroughs. No agreements. No declarations. Just two neighbors who need each other but do not trust each other, sitting in a room in New York, trying to manage a relationship that neither can afford to lose.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

76,451 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

BEGGARS CANNOT BE CHOOSERS. The world did not see the PAF flying during the entire four day war except the intial minutes when India struck terror sites on Day 1. PAF AWACS and JF-17s got shot down first by the S-400 when they got airborne, and when they got grounded they got slammed by Indian airstrikes on 11 airbases. Pakistani Aand Forces first failed in protecting the terror sites on the first day and failed on next day in protecting the radars and ADs in whole Pakistan from Indian Drone strikes and failed again on next day to save hangars and runways of 11 PAF airbases. All they have is the Lahori Churan of "We shot down Rafales and destroyed S-400" with blurry satellite images as proofs. Now coming to Pakistan being a negotiator in the Iran War. It is just a joke. Pakistan is just a postman exchanging messages, nothing more. Did Iran has said till now that it accepts Pakistani mediation or even this postman role? No. Did Vance came to Pakistan to negotiate with Iran either? No. All Pakistan did was sell Lahori Churan to its own people and hold a meeting with the FMs of Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, all of whom are just client states of the US. Two need loans from the US and two need security from the US. Pakistan is doing all of this drama for three reasons. First, Pakistan needs IMF and World Bank loans to survive the coming economic shock, so it cannot anger its masters in Washington. Second, if the Iran war escalates, Saudi Arabia can ask Pakistan to protect them under that so called defence pact, which could create a civil war in Pakistan because of the Shia-Sunni divide. Moreover, if Pakistan denies Saudi Arabia's request, Riyadh can pull out the $5 billion dollars it placed in Pakistani banks to save Pakistan from defaulting. Third, if the US starts a ground invasion or operations in Iran it will need bases in Pakistan for intel gathering, and in that scenario Iran will start striking Pakistan as well. So the only way out Pakistan sees from this situation is a terror attack on India to trigger a war, so Pakistan can decouple itself from the whole situation. Because the Aand Forces know they are just a postman, no deescalation or peace is happening, and in an escalatory situation Pakistan will be caught between a rock and a hard place. If Pakistanis still do not believe this, at least listen to your own Form 47 government's PM ShowBaz Sharif, who admits that No one in the world takes Pakistan seriously and uses it as a Useful idiot or Mercenary State.

The Unknown

86,047 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇳 India and Pakistan, China and India, all seated at the same table in Kyrgyzstan this week. The SCO is 25: Ten members, roughly half the planet. China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Belarus, and Central Asia are meeting while Ukraine still burns and Iran is at war. Guterres is there, and Erdoğan is around the edges. This is no longer a quiet regional club. The SCO is often described as a counterweight to Washington, but it isn’t a unified anti-U.S. bloc: its members have competing strategic interests, different relationships with the West and, in some cases, longstanding tensions with each other. That makes the summit significant, as China and Russia may want a more multipolar world with less U.S. dominance, while countries like India have strong incentives to preserve strategic independence rather than simply choose one geopolitical camp. On Monday, China and Russia pledged to push the SCO toward a bigger role in “global governance,” where Putin offered to make Russia-China visa-free travel permanent after tourism jumped 43%. Meanwhile, India is playing a different game. Modi hugged Putin, invited him to BRICS in New Delhi, and still told him the world has to leave “endless war” behind. He told Iran’s Pezeshkian India will back efforts at lasting peace. Translation: keep Russia for energy and defense, refuse to join a China-Russia camp, talk to everyone. That is the real summit; India and Pakistan in one room, China and India with an open border dispute, Iran hunting cover, Central Asia wanting Chinese cash without becoming a Chinese province, and Kyrgyzstan trying to turn anniversary talk into funds, corridors, and counterterror machinery. The SCO cannot replace the West, but they can watch three things: whether the Bishkek Declaration names terrorism and the Iran war in language everyone can live with; who actually gets time with whom; and whether any real money moves. Speeches are cheap, but routes, gas, and financing are how an order shifts. These guys ultimately may not trust each other... but they showed up anyway. Source: France 24 YT / Writer: Val

Mario Nawfal

73,891 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce