Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

51,597 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Happy Saturday, dear Pioneers from around the world 🌍 Today, I want to share important thoughts on how truly great things succeed. These points are essential for every Pioneer to understand. 1. Focus on Building, Not on Results Great success never comes from chasing results—it comes from consistent building. When we focus only on results, we become distracted, impatient, and emotionally unstable, increasing the risk of failure. This behavior will lead us toward failure. Only building leads to real success. This is exactly what the Core Team (CT) and the GCV Core Team are doing: CT focuses on infrastructure, technology, and system stability GCV Ambassadors and Special Envoys focus on education, ecosystem development, and real-world adoption This division of responsibility is correct and necessary. 2. Correctly Understand the Relationship Between Pioneers and CT This point is very important. Some Pioneers doubt GCV because they think: “CT never supports GCV, so GCV must be fake.” This understanding is completely wrong. The Core Team handles only technical and infrastructure matters CT is not allowed to guide or decide the value of Pi Dr. Nicolas himself stated: Pi is worth what Pioneers make it worth 👉 GCV is the responsibility and authority of Pioneers, not CT. There is no need to ask CT for permission. When Pioneers collectively decide on GCV (for example, $314,159), CT must implement it technically. ⚠️ Important reminder: Do not post GCV discussions in official chat rooms or argue with moderators Chat rooms exist to resolve technical issues only Economic and value discussions belong to the Pioneer community Respect all moderator rules Respecting boundaries keeps the ecosystem healthy. 3. Great Things Are Built Quietly, Not Publicly Chasing news from CT is 100% the wrong direction. Why? Most circulating “news” is fake or misleading Even real internal information, when spread publicly, can force CT to change original plans This delays Open Mainnet (OM) instead of accelerating it There is no benefit, only harm. Fake news creates: Anxiety Unrealistic expectations Complaints against CT Loss of trust When trust in CT decreases, Pi Network faces serious risk. 4. Build Strong Communities Through Education Our true responsibility is community building, so Pioneers can: Understand CT correctly Understand GCV correctly Support both CT and GCV with confidence This makes the Open Mainnet process safer and faster. Many leaders are doing excellent work through education and guidance: Ms. Lumari & Mr. Jojo – Vietnam, Thailand, Bangladesh, Philippines, South Korea, and global management Ms. Nonny Padja – Indonesia and global community alliance Mr. Patrick Chua – Malaysia Mr. Raaj Sharma & Mr. Issack Bester – India Mr. Shi Long Yu – China Mr. Iyanda Cherif Abiola & Mr. Oliver Ndatimana – Africa Mr. Mohammed Alademi & Mr. Samer Sioury – Arab community …and more who cannot all be mentioned here. This is real building. This is what we should focus on. Final Reminder Searching for “good news” and spreading unverified information harms the Open Mainnet process. 🚫 Stop forwarding rumors and speculation ✅ Share education, ecosystem development, and real adoption progress only Stay calm. Stay focused. Keep building. This is how great things succeed. Thank you Doris Yin 🪷 🪷🪷 Jan 10th 2026

Doris Yin 东方紫莲🪷

12,354 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Announcing the 2025 Hackathon & GCV Update Happy Saturday, Global Pioneers and Global GCV Ambassadors! This is Doris Yin from Toronto, Canada. How are you doing? I hope everything is going well. Today, I want to share the Core Team announcement about the 2025 Hackathon. The prizes are: First prize: 75,000 Pi Second prize: 45,000 Pi Third prize: 15,000 Pi I know some of you may feel discouraged about GCV because CT uses exchange price for prize. , but there’s no need to worry. Let me explain why. This does not mean GCV has failed, nor does it mean the Core Team supports a low Pi value. As I mentioned before, we have two methods, two paths to strengthen GCV. The first path is offline GCV. This is very important. We still need to implement partial Pi payments at GCV offline, and more merchants are joining in. They appreciate it because it helps local businesses grow. This is already happening in countries like China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and India. We can also observe more GCV data being recorded on the blockchain, which is essential to OM fix Pi value. Instead of the Pi value coming from the exchange market, it comes from the community-driven process. You can see this reflected in the blockchain records. Our social media, groups, communities, and education efforts help pioneers recognize and acknowledge the Pi value and GCV. However, we also need online utilities and DApps. This will increase actual usage of Pi after the Open Mainnet. So we have two parts: 1. Value confirmation: We must continue building and creating more GCV data. 2. DApps and utilities usage: We need higher-quality DApps widely usage to guarantee and protect GCV. Currently, DApps are limited and mostly from pioneers, not professionals. We need good-quality DApps. If the Core Team were to simply give a prize of one Pi, it wouldn’t motivate developers—especially top developers inside and outside the community. To truly motivate them, we must use the exchange market price to attract the highest-level developers. For example, the first prize of 75,000 Pi is roughly 20,000–30,000 USD. That’s a meaningful incentive now, and in the future, it could be even higher. Developers can also see the future value of Pi, not just the current 30 cents, which encourages high-quality development. As we develop more, it supports the full realization of GCV. Offline partial Pi payments, partial fiat payments, and industrial alliances in different countries attract more participants. Online, using exchange market price to increase demand and reduce Pi selling pressure, helping to keep the price steadily increasing. When pioneers spend Pi on items, it reduces the circulating supply, creating scarcity, which is positive for the Pi Network and GCV. Some anti-GCV voices laugh and say “GCV has failed,” but they laughed too early because the CT strategy is helping GCV. Even these early critics help GCV by increasing awareness and adoption. I will also write articles to explain this further for everyone. Regarding the Core Team: it wouldn’t make sense for them to target only 30 cents. Their goal is GCV because any project owner wants their product or service to be meaningful and valuable. A higher Pi value is good for the ecosystem. GCV can support the Pi Network long-term, possibly 100 years or even 1,000 years. We don’t have hundreds of billions of Pi in circulation—currently, only about 2 billion exist. When fully released, it will take time, and the value will continue to grow. I hope everyone understands. Happy Saturday! Enjoy your day, keep working, and help the community. I also hope our GCV Ambassadors actively participate in the 2025 Hackathon. Thank you, and goodbye for now! Doris Yin 🪷 🪷🪷 Founder, Global GCV Movement August 16th, 2025

Doris Yin 东方紫莲🪷

28,870 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

U.S. TAXPAYERS funding massive GLOBAL ELECTION FRAUD CARTEL connected to over 100+ countries called A-WEB, tied to USAID, SMARTMATIC, U.S. DEMOCRATS, and the CCP's Belt and Road initiative. SMARTMATIC not only allegedly tampered in U.S. elections, they were just caught bribing election officials in the Philippines. South Korea is also facing massive fraud through the same systems. Why do you think Bill Clinton was just caught flying to South Korea right before their elections? This is connected to all the major Democrats in the U.S., including George Soros. They all work in conjunction and have their role. Whether it's rigging elections, pushing communist ideas and education, or starting protest and riots on the ground or on social media. This is beyond a massive communist plan to rig elections worldwide and U.S. taxpayers don't even know that they're funding it. A-WEB is an international organization established in 2014 during the Obama administration to expand overseas electoral assistance. This period coincided with South Korea's first election of a UN Secretary-General and its active engagement on the international stage. This international organization entered into agreements with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), premised on supporting elections in developing countries. From 2014 until just before USAID's closure, it appears funding channels connected to the U.S. side still exist. It has approximately 100 member countries and engages in activities such as exchanges, forums, various educational programs, and exports. Problems arose during the implementation of ODA projects. This is where the issues began. Korean politicians with close ties to Smartmatic encouraged Korean companies to develop electronic voting machines similar to Smartmatic's. Subsequently, these machines were exported overseas as state-led projects. Exports occurred to various countries, including Iraq, Congo, and Kyrgyzstan. Particularly, problems occurred in Iraq and Congo from 2018 to 2019. As seen in the comments below, Congolese protesters came to the A-WEB building and held a public demonstration. At the time, Congo was in the midst of a civil war, resulting in numerous casualties. As mentioned in the comments below, election fraud has also occurred in several other member states, particularly in Europe and other countries—that is, all A-WEB member states. South Korea has experienced decisive election fraud at least 3-4 times. The current government is pursuing a completely pro-China policy. 6. South Korea's election fraud + international election cartel A-WEB Oceania Member List (As of February 14, 2025) Currently, a total of 6 organizations in 6 countries Oceania. 2013 - Australia , Vanuatu, Samoa, Tonga 2015 - Fiji 2017 - Papua New Guinea 2020 - Solomon Islands A-WEB Africa Member List (As of February, 2025) 36 countries North Africa: Egypt, Libya, Tunisia West Africa: Benin, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Nigeria, Liberia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Mali, Togo, Côte d'Ivoire Central Africa: Gabon, São Tomé and Príncipe, Cameroon, Republic of the Congo, Angola East Africa: Djibouti, Kenya, South Sudan, Rwanda, Somalia, Ethiopia, Uganda, Burundi, Tanzania, Mauritius, Malawi Southern Africa: South Africa, Lesotho, Mozambique, Madagascar, Zambia A-WEB America Member List (As of February 12, 2025) A total of 31 institutions from 25 countries. North America: 2013 - Canada, Mexico Central America: 2013 - Costa Rica, El Salvador, Panama, Guatemala, Nicaragua Caribbean: 2013 - Bahamas, Barbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, Puerto Rico South America: 2013 - Colombia, Guyana, Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Venezuela, Suriname, 2015 - Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru WEB Europe Member List (As of February 14, 2025) Currently, a total of 18 countries and 18 institutions 2013 - Russia, Romania, Latvia, Moldova, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Serbia, Albania, Georgia, Kosovo, Turkey, Portugal, Poland, France, Hungary 2019 - Ukraine 2023 - This report details the number of election fraud allegations in the countries above Armenia since joining A-WEB. Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) BRI Leading Country - 1 country: · China BRI Signing Countries - 154 Countries (Omitted) ⁕ BRI Summit Participating Country - 1 Country: · North Korea A-WEB Member Countries Corresponding to BRI - 89 Countries: Ghana Gabon Guyana Gambia Guinea Nigeria South Sudan South Africa Nicaragua Dominican Republic Timor-Leste Liberia Latvia Russia Lebanon Lesotho Romania Rwanda Libya Madagascar Malawi Mali Mozambique Moldova Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Vanuatu Barbados Bangladesh Benin Venezuela Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Bolivia Burundi Burkina Faso Bulgaria Samoa São Tomé and Príncipe Senegal Serbia Somalia Solomon Islands Suriname Sri Lanka Sierra Leone Armenia Argentina Afghanistan Albania Angola Ecuador Ethiopia El Salvador Yemen Uganda Uzbekistan Ukraine Iraq Egypt Indonesia Jamaica Zambia Georgia Djibouti Cameroon Kazakhstan Cambodia Kenya Côte d'Ivoire Republic of the Congo Kyrgyzstan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Tunisia Trinidad and Tobago Panama (withdrew Feb 2025) Pakistan Papua New Guinea Palestine Peru Portugal Poland Fiji Philippines (withdrew May 2022) BRI Withdrawn Countries - 4 Countries: Italy Panama Philippines Estonia 89 out of 109 A-WEB member countries are included in China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) signing countries. This accounts for ~81.65% of A-WEB members, indicating a very high correlation between A-WEB and BRI. ~57.8% of all 154 BRI signing countries are A-WEB members. This communist takeover is massive and they're buying politicians in every country and installing machines and software that can be altered in real-time to rig elections. It's time to wake up and fight back.

The SCIF

485,805 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce