Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Informed consent from minors is not possible.

America's Frontline Doctors

48,003 subscribers

22,900 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

DeSantis defends Florida’s move to end vaccine mandates: “We’ve always been for informed consent and parental rights. When mandates coerce choices and penalize families, that’s not informed consent. Empowering people to decide for themselves is the right path.”-- Ron DeSantis

DeSantis defends Florida’s move to end vaccine mandates: “We’ve always been for informed consent and parental rights. When mandates coerce choices and penalize families, that’s not informed consent. Empowering people to decide for themselves is the right path.”-- Ron DeSantis

Laura Ingraham

70,127 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

UK Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen explains how informed consent in the Covid19 vaccination campaign was not possible, because the product rolled out to the public was manufactured differently from the one tested by Pfizer. Did Pfizer inform the government of this?

UK Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen explains how informed consent in the Covid19 vaccination campaign was not possible, because the product rolled out to the public was manufactured differently from the one tested by Pfizer. Did Pfizer inform the government of this?

Robin Monotti

79,969 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

If a pediatrician wants a parent to inject one of these products into their baby, they should persuade on the merits. Inform. Then let each person decide whether or not to consent. If someone refuses to consent, that should be the end of the story. That is what is known as “informed consent”—they were informed and didn’t consent. Instead, the medical community, led by pharma, lobbies to take away the rights of those who refuse to consent, censors those who dispute any mantras, and expels from civil society those who refuse to be injected. That is antithetical to consent. Riley Gaines Alex Clark

If a pediatrician wants a parent to inject one of these products into their baby, they should persuade on the merits. Inform. Then let each person decide whether or not to consent. If someone refuses to consent, that should be the end of the story. That is what is known as “informed consent”—they were informed and didn’t consent. Instead, the medical community, led by pharma, lobbies to take away the rights of those who refuse to consent, censors those who dispute any mantras, and expels from civil society those who refuse to be injected. That is antithetical to consent. Riley Gaines Alex Clark

Aaron Siri

46,925 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Surgeon General nominee Casey Means says she will be a proponent of informed consent for vaccines. “I think it’s very important as a physician to rebuild trust in public health.” “And to make sure that patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctor before getting any medication.” “I do not want to not encourage patients to have a conversation with their doctor.” “Informed consent is going to be part of building trust in public health.” Casey Means, MD

Surgeon General nominee Casey Means says she will be a proponent of informed consent for vaccines. “I think it’s very important as a physician to rebuild trust in public health.” “And to make sure that patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctor before getting any medication.” “I do not want to not encourage patients to have a conversation with their doctor.” “Informed consent is going to be part of building trust in public health.” Casey Means, MD

Children’s Health Defense

39,141 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

He gave his children vaccines. He now says, "If I had to go back, I would not." Why? RFK Jr. to Megyn Kelly: "I didn't know." The most important factor in healthcare is informed consent. Are we truly informed?

He gave his children vaccines. He now says, "If I had to go back, I would not." Why? RFK Jr. to Megyn Kelly: "I didn't know." The most important factor in healthcare is informed consent. Are we truly informed?

Camus

69,338 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent.

Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent.

Anna Matson

103,831 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

From Tuesdays event outside the Irish Medical Council offices, with my colleagues who care about patient safety and informed consent.

From Tuesdays event outside the Irish Medical Council offices, with my colleagues who care about patient safety and informed consent.

Dr. Anne Mc Closkey

20,159 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Informed Consent Friday: The Truth About Crestor and Statin Therapy

Informed Consent Friday: The Truth About Crestor and Statin Therapy

Dr. Jeff Barke

29,001 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Plausible deniability is no longer an excuse for lack of informed consent. The person jabbing is personally liable for injury.

Plausible deniability is no longer an excuse for lack of informed consent. The person jabbing is personally liable for injury.

RosieM

118,520 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

What did ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network’s hep b vaccine petition really ask for and how NYT is plainly not a serious news outlet. Link to full interview below.

What did ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network’s hep b vaccine petition really ask for and how NYT is plainly not a serious news outlet. Link to full interview below.

Aaron Siri

19,448 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Consent is not transferable.

Consent is not transferable.

Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology

36,555 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

So-called ‘gender transition’ for minors has left real victims in its wake - children rushed into irreversible procedures without adequate protections or truly informed consent. Last night on Fox News, I discussed legislation I introduced in the House, the Chloe Cole ⭐️ Act, which would establish meaningful safeguards for minors and hold medical professionals accountable.

So-called ‘gender transition’ for minors has left real victims in its wake - children rushed into irreversible procedures without adequate protections or truly informed consent. Last night on Fox News, I discussed legislation I introduced in the House, the Chloe Cole ⭐️ Act, which would establish meaningful safeguards for minors and hold medical professionals accountable.

Bob Onder

16,100 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.

Doc Malik

11,878 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Informed consent starts with honest labeling. "A black box, it's a way to get doctors to provide informed consent and to do a risk-benefit assessment before somebody puts themselves at risk." - Jessica Rose 🤙

Informed consent starts with honest labeling. "A black box, it's a way to get doctors to provide informed consent and to do a risk-benefit assessment before somebody puts themselves at risk." - Jessica Rose 🤙

TFTC

11,069 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 As a mom and attorney, I know vaccine choice is a constitutional right. Mandates aren’t about health—they’re about control. Freedom means informed consent, not government force. RFK Jr is protecting all Americans. Watch:

🚨 As a mom and attorney, I know vaccine choice is a constitutional right. Mandates aren’t about health—they’re about control. Freedom means informed consent, not government force. RFK Jr is protecting all Americans. Watch:

Mehek Cooke🇺🇸

51,240 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🟠🇨🇦🦅🌊 : NDP MP and MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ spokesperson, Leah Gazan, is upset Mark Carney didn't seek informed consent with a First Nations community over tailing ponds. Funny how informed consent is important to Leah Gazan when it comes to First Nations, but not the general public. Mark Carney gave land title over most of the GVA & waterways to the 1,300 member Musqueam band. 2+ million residents of the GVA were informed weeks later, after the deal had been signed. Leah never once complained that 2 million people never gave their consent to such a deal.

🟠🇨🇦🦅🌊 : NDP MP and MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ spokesperson, Leah Gazan, is upset Mark Carney didn't seek informed consent with a First Nations community over tailing ponds. Funny how informed consent is important to Leah Gazan when it comes to First Nations, but not the general public. Mark Carney gave land title over most of the GVA & waterways to the 1,300 member Musqueam band. 2+ million residents of the GVA were informed weeks later, after the deal had been signed. Leah never once complained that 2 million people never gave their consent to such a deal.

Bruce McGonigal

14,366 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce