Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Informed consent starts with honest labeling. "A black box, it's a way to get doctors to provide informed consent and to do a risk-benefit assessment before somebody puts themselves at risk." - Jessica Rose 🤙

TFTC21's profile picture

TFTC

91,718 subscribers

11,069 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent.
1:00

Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent.

Anna Matson

103,831 просмотров • 1 год назад

CASSIDY: Would you encourage Americans to take the flu vaccine? CASEY MEANS: I do think it's important as a physician and to rebuild trust in public health to make sure patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctors before getting any medication
0:38

CASSIDY: Would you encourage Americans to take the flu vaccine? CASEY MEANS: I do think it's important as a physician and to rebuild trust in public health to make sure patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctors before getting any medication

Aaron Rupar

118,014 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Surgeon General nominee Casey Means says she will be a proponent of informed consent for vaccines. “I think it’s very important as a physician to rebuild trust in public health.” “And to make sure that patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctor before getting any medication.” “I do not want to not encourage patients to have a conversation with their doctor.” “Informed consent is going to be part of building trust in public health.” Casey Means, MD
0:52

Surgeon General nominee Casey Means says she will be a proponent of informed consent for vaccines. “I think it’s very important as a physician to rebuild trust in public health.” “And to make sure that patients are encouraged to have informed consent with their doctor before getting any medication.” “I do not want to not encourage patients to have a conversation with their doctor.” “Informed consent is going to be part of building trust in public health.” Casey Means, MD

Children’s Health Defense

39,141 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Statins Harm Mitochondria. (Full 17m Video) 👇 This isn't about fear-mongering. It's about informed consent. Patients have a right to information and choice.
16:49

Statins Harm Mitochondria. (Full 17m Video) 👇 This isn't about fear-mongering. It's about informed consent. Patients have a right to information and choice.

Nick Norwitz MD PhD

28,334 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

If a pediatrician wants a parent to inject one of these products into their baby, they should persuade on the merits. Inform. Then let each person decide whether or not to consent. If someone refuses to consent, that should be the end of the story. That is what is known as “informed consent”—they were informed and didn’t consent. Instead, the medical community, led by pharma, lobbies to take away the rights of those who refuse to consent, censors those who dispute any mantras, and expels from civil society those who refuse to be injected. That is antithetical to consent. Riley Gaines
0:32

If a pediatrician wants a parent to inject one of these products into their baby, they should persuade on the merits. Inform. Then let each person decide whether or not to consent. If someone refuses to consent, that should be the end of the story. That is what is known as “informed consent”—they were informed and didn’t consent. Instead, the medical community, led by pharma, lobbies to take away the rights of those who refuse to consent, censors those who dispute any mantras, and expels from civil society those who refuse to be injected. That is antithetical to consent. Riley Gaines

Aaron Siri

46,939 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bill C-5 violates the constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate Indigenous peoples, diminishes environmental oversight, and puts workers and communities at risk. I and my NDP colleagues oppose Bill C-5 in its current form. I demand that the federal government uphold their constitutional obligations to obtain free, prior and informed consent.
1:27

Bill C-5 violates the constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate Indigenous peoples, diminishes environmental oversight, and puts workers and communities at risk. I and my NDP colleagues oppose Bill C-5 in its current form. I demand that the federal government uphold their constitutional obligations to obtain free, prior and informed consent.

Leah ProudLakota (she/her)

13,643 просмотров • 1 год назад

Woman describes the lack of informed consent she got prior to starting testosterone, including a perpetual UTI, and how it led her to not recognize a side effect or know how bad it could get.
5:08

Woman describes the lack of informed consent she got prior to starting testosterone, including a perpetual UTI, and how it led her to not recognize a side effect or know how bad it could get.

Σ𝕏ulansic 🦎

170,924 просмотров • 1 год назад

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.
13:27

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.

Doc Malik

11,932 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

On informed consent and keeping data on a need-to-know basis. evin (disco) at the Identity panel at our New Year Summit. An important reminder for us to build a more user-friendly and humane Web 🫡 Full video:
0:22

On informed consent and keeping data on a need-to-know basis. evin (disco) at the Identity panel at our New Year Summit. An important reminder for us to build a more user-friendly and humane Web 🫡 Full video:

Cyber

29,321 просмотров • 3 лет назад

.Dr. Marty Makary: Acetaminophen has been given way too frequently without ANY discussion of the potential risks to balance out those discussions about the potential benefit. We're just saying we want this body of scientific evidence to be a part of that informed consent.
0:50

.Dr. Marty Makary: Acetaminophen has been given way too frequently without ANY discussion of the potential risks to balance out those discussions about the potential benefit. We're just saying we want this body of scientific evidence to be a part of that informed consent.

Rapid Response 47

53,482 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🟠🇨🇦🦅🌊 : NDP MP and MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ spokesperson, Leah Gazan, is upset Mark Carney didn't seek informed consent with a First Nations community over tailing ponds. Funny how informed consent is important to Leah Gazan when it comes to First Nations, but not the general public. Mark Carney gave land title over most of the GVA & waterways to the 1,300 member Musqueam band. 2+ million residents of the GVA were informed weeks later, after the deal had been signed. Leah never once complained that 2 million people never gave their consent to such a deal.
1:13

🟠🇨🇦🦅🌊 : NDP MP and MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ spokesperson, Leah Gazan, is upset Mark Carney didn't seek informed consent with a First Nations community over tailing ponds. Funny how informed consent is important to Leah Gazan when it comes to First Nations, but not the general public. Mark Carney gave land title over most of the GVA & waterways to the 1,300 member Musqueam band. 2+ million residents of the GVA were informed weeks later, after the deal had been signed. Leah never once complained that 2 million people never gave their consent to such a deal.

Bruce McGonigal

14,366 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The "fine print" in medicine shouldn’t be a mystery. When it comes to our children’s health, a simple "you might get a fever" doesn't cut it. Informed consent is a fundamental right, not a suggestion. Let’s bring back transparency to the doctor’s office. Share this with a parent who believes in the power of informed medical decisions. Steve Kirsch
0:27

The "fine print" in medicine shouldn’t be a mystery. When it comes to our children’s health, a simple "you might get a fever" doesn't cut it. Informed consent is a fundamental right, not a suggestion. Let’s bring back transparency to the doctor’s office. Share this with a parent who believes in the power of informed medical decisions. Steve Kirsch

Mary Talley Bowden MD

14,591 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“If there’s no benefit, why take the risk?” Dr. Cartland tried to protect kids and defend informed consent. The GMC destroyed his career for speaking out — labeled “anti-vax” despite taking TWO COVID shots. What he shares in this interview is SHOCKING 👇 Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP
2:19

“If there’s no benefit, why take the risk?” Dr. Cartland tried to protect kids and defend informed consent. The GMC destroyed his career for speaking out — labeled “anti-vax” despite taking TWO COVID shots. What he shares in this interview is SHOCKING 👇 Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

CHDTV Live

32,812 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Beware...The Affordable Care Act Declares All Vaccines To Be 'Medical Biogenics.' Hospitalized, You Or Your Loved One Will Be Injected With Vaccines While In Surgery...While Under Anesthesia...Without Your Knowledge. Never Sign Any Form Agreeing To 'Receive Medical Biogenics.' Beware of 'informed consent' & know what you are signing... When people go to a hospital, a health care clinic, or a doctor’s office, they are almost always given a written informed consent form to sign prior to receiving medical treatment. In recent years, these consent forms have begun to include statements asking the patient to agree to receive biogenics/biologics. However, many people do not know what the term biogenics/biologics means. According To The US FDA...Examples Of What Is Considered A Biologic/Biogenic & Can Be Administered To You Without Your Knowledge: Monoclonal antibodies Growth factors Vaccines Allergenics Antitoxins Blood products, such as red blood cells or platelets Botox Gene therapies Hormone replacement therapy Immunotherapy Recombinant proteins, such as insulin Stem cell therapies T-cell therapies Vaccines are biologics/biogenics, but new consent forms do not explicitly state this. If you provide your consent for you or your family member to receive biologics/biogenics in a hospital, doctor’s office or other facility that administers pharmaceutical products, you are giving medical personnel permission to administer any vaccines they deem necessary while you are under their care. If you’ve consented to biologics/biogenics and it is “flu season,” for example & you are receiving medical care, you may be given the influenza vaccine without specifically being asked or informed beforehand, even if you happen to be under anesthesia. If you do not want vaccines to be given to you, your child or a family member who has entrusted you with making medical decisions for them, you have the legal right to sign a statement on the written consent form refusing any type of vaccine. The concept of medical informed consent stems from the ethical principle of autonomy & patients have the legal right to be fully informed about the benefits, risks & failures of a physician-recommended medical procedure prior to making an informed & voluntary decision about whether or not to accept the risks. Like freedom of thought, speech, conscience & religious belief, informed consent to medical risk taking is recognized internationally as a human right. No one, including your physician, has the right to coerce you into agreeing to a medical intervention, such as vaccination, which could result in injury or death. You have the legal right to exercise informed consent by carefully reading written informed consent forms prior to any medical procedure, including receipt of biologics/biogenics (vaccines). Informed consent is protection against violation of human rights in the medical system. 👇Biologics & Biogenics In The Medical World👇 👇What Are Biologics/Biogenics Products👇 👇Innovation Policy & Market For Vaccines👇 Video: uncovering_hidden_truths
2:52

Beware...The Affordable Care Act Declares All Vaccines To Be 'Medical Biogenics.' Hospitalized, You Or Your Loved One Will Be Injected With Vaccines While In Surgery...While Under Anesthesia...Without Your Knowledge. Never Sign Any Form Agreeing To 'Receive Medical Biogenics.' Beware of 'informed consent' & know what you are signing... When people go to a hospital, a health care clinic, or a doctor’s office, they are almost always given a written informed consent form to sign prior to receiving medical treatment. In recent years, these consent forms have begun to include statements asking the patient to agree to receive biogenics/biologics. However, many people do not know what the term biogenics/biologics means. According To The US FDA...Examples Of What Is Considered A Biologic/Biogenic & Can Be Administered To You Without Your Knowledge: Monoclonal antibodies Growth factors Vaccines Allergenics Antitoxins Blood products, such as red blood cells or platelets Botox Gene therapies Hormone replacement therapy Immunotherapy Recombinant proteins, such as insulin Stem cell therapies T-cell therapies Vaccines are biologics/biogenics, but new consent forms do not explicitly state this. If you provide your consent for you or your family member to receive biologics/biogenics in a hospital, doctor’s office or other facility that administers pharmaceutical products, you are giving medical personnel permission to administer any vaccines they deem necessary while you are under their care. If you’ve consented to biologics/biogenics and it is “flu season,” for example & you are receiving medical care, you may be given the influenza vaccine without specifically being asked or informed beforehand, even if you happen to be under anesthesia. If you do not want vaccines to be given to you, your child or a family member who has entrusted you with making medical decisions for them, you have the legal right to sign a statement on the written consent form refusing any type of vaccine. The concept of medical informed consent stems from the ethical principle of autonomy & patients have the legal right to be fully informed about the benefits, risks & failures of a physician-recommended medical procedure prior to making an informed & voluntary decision about whether or not to accept the risks. Like freedom of thought, speech, conscience & religious belief, informed consent to medical risk taking is recognized internationally as a human right. No one, including your physician, has the right to coerce you into agreeing to a medical intervention, such as vaccination, which could result in injury or death. You have the legal right to exercise informed consent by carefully reading written informed consent forms prior to any medical procedure, including receipt of biologics/biogenics (vaccines). Informed consent is protection against violation of human rights in the medical system. 👇Biologics & Biogenics In The Medical World👇 👇What Are Biologics/Biogenics Products👇 👇Innovation Policy & Market For Vaccines👇 Video: uncovering_hidden_truths

Valerie Anne Smith

274,761 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Based With Senator Alex Antic - Episode 40 - Del Bigtree Del Bigtree - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree is the host of The Highwire The HighWire and CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network. Del has had a long career in television and film production, working on productions such as Dr Phil, The Doctors, and Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Conspiracy, as well as serving as communications director for Robert F. Kennedy Jr's 2024 presidential campaign. On this episode of Based, Senator Antic and Del Bigtree discuss Australia's Covid response, the obstacles facing RFK Jr and MAHA, and commonsense questions regarding informed consent and medical procedures.
44:21

Based With Senator Alex Antic - Episode 40 - Del Bigtree Del Bigtree - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree is the host of The Highwire The HighWire and CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network. Del has had a long career in television and film production, working on productions such as Dr Phil, The Doctors, and Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Conspiracy, as well as serving as communications director for Robert F. Kennedy Jr's 2024 presidential campaign. On this episode of Based, Senator Antic and Del Bigtree discuss Australia's Covid response, the obstacles facing RFK Jr and MAHA, and commonsense questions regarding informed consent and medical procedures.

Senator Alex Antic

10,274 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

“I don't want America to be fooled thinking the vaccines save lives, because they didn't.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® drops truth at the Senator Ron Johnson Senate hearing. Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network 💥 CDC knew the risks. The data doesn’t lie. 📺 Watch full hearing: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network #COVIDVaccine
0:57

“I don't want America to be fooled thinking the vaccines save lives, because they didn't.” Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® drops truth at the Senator Ron Johnson Senate hearing. Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network 💥 CDC knew the risks. The data doesn’t lie. 📺 Watch full hearing: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network #COVIDVaccine

The HighWire

29,892 просмотров • 1 год назад

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26
33:27

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26

NZ and the MRNA

17,026 просмотров • 17 дней назад

What did ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network’s hep b vaccine petition really ask for and how NYT is plainly not a serious news outlet. Link to full interview below.
1:50

What did ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network’s hep b vaccine petition really ask for and how NYT is plainly not a serious news outlet. Link to full interview below.

Aaron Siri

19,448 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I Don't Have Kids Yet. But When I Do, I'm Choosing Not to Vaccinate." The risk of a child being hospitalized for a few days with measles is more manageable than the risk of that child becoming non-verbal for the next 50 years. That is the honest calculus parents are now making — and it's a legitimate one. Measles is treatable. Profound autism, affecting 27% of the spectrum, is a lifelong condition requiring 24/7 care. Informed consent means being allowed to weigh those risks without being shamed out of the conversation. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark Alex Clark Turning Point USA Watch the Full Episode: #MedicalFreedom
1:11

"I Don't Have Kids Yet. But When I Do, I'm Choosing Not to Vaccinate." The risk of a child being hospitalized for a few days with measles is more manageable than the risk of that child becoming non-verbal for the next 50 years. That is the honest calculus parents are now making — and it's a legitimate one. Measles is treatable. Profound autism, affecting 27% of the spectrum, is a lifelong condition requiring 24/7 care. Informed consent means being allowed to weigh those risks without being shamed out of the conversation. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark Alex Clark Turning Point USA Watch the Full Episode: #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

33,246 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад