正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

INFURIATING. Former CDC Director Robert Redfield reveals gain of function research is still happening under a different scientific definition: "The president has passed an executive order to stop the research, but the truth is this type of research is [still] being done. Part of the reason is the scientific... show more

Andrew Kolvet

305,100 subscribers

82,923 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术健康养生新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

NEW – President Trump to Halt Funding for Gain-of-Function Research "The Trump administration is drafting an executive order that would temporarily pause federal funding for gain-of-function research ... The goal of the order would be to stop scientists with U.S. funding from conducting gain-of-function research on viruses that could endanger human health"

NEW – President Trump to Halt Funding for Gain-of-Function Research "The Trump administration is drafting an executive order that would temporarily pause federal funding for gain-of-function research ... The goal of the order would be to stop scientists with U.S. funding from conducting gain-of-function research on viruses that could endanger human health"

Chief Nerd

257,745 次观看 • 1 年前

Peter Daszak argues the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not constitute gain-of-function research. Why? Because it fell outside of the 2017 HHS P3CO Framework on gain-of-function research, which only applied to enhancing potential pandemic pathogens—i.e. things that were likely highly virulent in humans already. So the argument is: the research at WIV did not fit the definition of "enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential" because the bat coronaviruses studied there had not been shown to infect humans. So in other words, under this 2017 HHS P3CO Framework, altering a virus that's not infectious in humans to make it highly infectious in humans DID NOT constitute gain-of-function research. Mind-boggling.

Peter Daszak argues the research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not constitute gain-of-function research. Why? Because it fell outside of the 2017 HHS P3CO Framework on gain-of-function research, which only applied to enhancing potential pandemic pathogens—i.e. things that were likely highly virulent in humans already. So the argument is: the research at WIV did not fit the definition of "enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential" because the bat coronaviruses studied there had not been shown to infect humans. So in other words, under this 2017 HHS P3CO Framework, altering a virus that's not infectious in humans to make it highly infectious in humans DID NOT constitute gain-of-function research. Mind-boggling.

Jan Jekielek

33,565 次观看 • 2 年前

October, 2018. While speaking at Harvard, Fauci is asked if gain of function research is worth the risk, specifically the risk of it leaking from a lab. Fauci: Banning all gain of function research will interfere with some of things we need to do. Fauci has already lied under oath about funding gain of function research and he's probably going to lie about it again shortly.

October, 2018. While speaking at Harvard, Fauci is asked if gain of function research is worth the risk, specifically the risk of it leaking from a lab. Fauci: Banning all gain of function research will interfere with some of things we need to do. Fauci has already lied under oath about funding gain of function research and he's probably going to lie about it again shortly.

MAZE

31,639 次观看 • 10 天前

🔥HISTORIC BREAKING NEWS: President Trump Ends Gain-Of-Function Research in U.S. “All of the history of gain-of-function research, we can't point to a single good thing that's come from it.” Secretary Kennedy

🔥HISTORIC BREAKING NEWS: President Trump Ends Gain-Of-Function Research in U.S. “All of the history of gain-of-function research, we can't point to a single good thing that's come from it.” Secretary Kennedy

Children’s Health Defense

281,929 次观看 • 1 年前

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield unveils a shocking narrative of bureaucratic maneuvering that may have circumvented a U.S. ban on dangerous research. 1/ THE BAN: The Obama administration DID officially outlaw gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens in the U.S. due to its inherent risks. This was a clear restriction. 2/ THE WORKAROUND: According to Redfield, officials then established a system of committees with the power to grant "waivers" and approve this banned research elsewhere. This provided a legalistic pathway to continue the work outside the country. 3/ THE WUHAN CONNECTION: Redfield points to the controversial research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the prime example. He alleges it "apparently never went through that committee," raising massive transparency and oversight flags. 4/ THE SEMANTIC DECEPTION: This is the most damning part. Redfield explains that the very definition of "gain-of-function" was changed to circumvent the ban. The new, narrow definition stated that only research that took a virus already pathogenic to humans and made it more dangerous counted. Therefore, taking a bat coronavirus (not yet pathogenic to humans) and manipulating it to infect human cells—the core of "gain-of-function" concern—was suddenly not considered gain-of-function by the new definition. 5/ THE FAUCI TESTIMONY: Redfield aggressively disagrees with Dr. Fauci’s congressional testimony that NIH never funded gain-of-function research. Under the letter of this new, manipulated law, Fauci could technically tell the truth while being materially misleading. Redfield calls this a "stain" on the agency and a "ludicrous" artificial distinction that betrayed the spirit of the law and public trust. The takeaway: A potentially dangerous practice was outlawed. Rather than stopping, powerful figures in the scientific bureaucracy appear to have redefined the terms and moved the work to a foreign partner, with catastrophic global consequences. This isn't just about science; it's about accountability, transparency, and the immense danger of allowing agencies to self-regulate and redefine the rules that are meant to protect us.

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield unveils a shocking narrative of bureaucratic maneuvering that may have circumvented a U.S. ban on dangerous research. 1/ THE BAN: The Obama administration DID officially outlaw gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens in the U.S. due to its inherent risks. This was a clear restriction. 2/ THE WORKAROUND: According to Redfield, officials then established a system of committees with the power to grant "waivers" and approve this banned research elsewhere. This provided a legalistic pathway to continue the work outside the country. 3/ THE WUHAN CONNECTION: Redfield points to the controversial research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the prime example. He alleges it "apparently never went through that committee," raising massive transparency and oversight flags. 4/ THE SEMANTIC DECEPTION: This is the most damning part. Redfield explains that the very definition of "gain-of-function" was changed to circumvent the ban. The new, narrow definition stated that only research that took a virus already pathogenic to humans and made it more dangerous counted. Therefore, taking a bat coronavirus (not yet pathogenic to humans) and manipulating it to infect human cells—the core of "gain-of-function" concern—was suddenly not considered gain-of-function by the new definition. 5/ THE FAUCI TESTIMONY: Redfield aggressively disagrees with Dr. Fauci’s congressional testimony that NIH never funded gain-of-function research. Under the letter of this new, manipulated law, Fauci could technically tell the truth while being materially misleading. Redfield calls this a "stain" on the agency and a "ludicrous" artificial distinction that betrayed the spirit of the law and public trust. The takeaway: A potentially dangerous practice was outlawed. Rather than stopping, powerful figures in the scientific bureaucracy appear to have redefined the terms and moved the work to a foreign partner, with catastrophic global consequences. This isn't just about science; it's about accountability, transparency, and the immense danger of allowing agencies to self-regulate and redefine the rules that are meant to protect us.

Camus

45,690 次观看 • 10 个月前

Dr. Robert Redfield: "There's No Doubt That NIH Funded Gain-of-Function Research" Ms. Malliotakis: "Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?" Dr. Redfield: "I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."

Dr. Robert Redfield: "There's No Doubt That NIH Funded Gain-of-Function Research" Ms. Malliotakis: "Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus?" Dr. Redfield: "I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,862,372 次观看 • 3 年前

Sen. Paul: “Do you fund Dr. [Ralph] Baric’s gain-of-function research?” Fauci: “Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it’s according to the guidelines and it is being conducted in North Carolina, not China.”

Sen. Paul: “Do you fund Dr. [Ralph] Baric’s gain-of-function research?” Fauci: “Dr. Baric is not doing gain-of-function research, and if it is, it’s according to the guidelines and it is being conducted in North Carolina, not China.”

Sense Receptor

513,831 次观看 • 3 年前

.Secretary Kennedy tells the story of how America came to fund Gain-of-Function research in Wuhan: "In all of the history of Gain-of-Function research, we cannot point to a single good thing that has come of it."

.Secretary Kennedy tells the story of how America came to fund Gain-of-Function research in Wuhan: "In all of the history of Gain-of-Function research, we cannot point to a single good thing that has come of it."

Rapid Response 47

627,055 次观看 • 1 年前

Rand Paul didn’t stop there. He got right to the heart of the questions of Covid-19 origins and gain-of-function research. “You were at OSTP 2015-2016. Was any of the research between Ralph Baric and the Wuhan Institute of Virology subject to the pause on gain-of-function during your period of time there?” Dr. Monarez: “All federally funded research that met the standards of gain-of-function should have been paused under that gain-of-function pause.” Sen. Paul: “Right, but several were granted exemptions. Are you aware of an exemption that was granted to the Wuhan research?” Dr. Monarez: “I am not aware of that.” Sen. Paul: “Do you believe that the research that was being done over that period of time and subsequently was gain-of-function research?” Dr. Monarez: “I haven’t had an opportunity to look at research, but I share your concerns about gain-of-function.” Sen. Paul: “There’s about 10 books written about it. I mean … 15 million people died. You’re gonna be in charge of infectious disease.” “And even EcoHealth, which was funding the research in Wuhan, finally sends a letter back to NIH and they say thank you for releasing the pause on our gain of function research.” Rand Paul

Rand Paul didn’t stop there. He got right to the heart of the questions of Covid-19 origins and gain-of-function research. “You were at OSTP 2015-2016. Was any of the research between Ralph Baric and the Wuhan Institute of Virology subject to the pause on gain-of-function during your period of time there?” Dr. Monarez: “All federally funded research that met the standards of gain-of-function should have been paused under that gain-of-function pause.” Sen. Paul: “Right, but several were granted exemptions. Are you aware of an exemption that was granted to the Wuhan research?” Dr. Monarez: “I am not aware of that.” Sen. Paul: “Do you believe that the research that was being done over that period of time and subsequently was gain-of-function research?” Dr. Monarez: “I haven’t had an opportunity to look at research, but I share your concerns about gain-of-function.” Sen. Paul: “There’s about 10 books written about it. I mean … 15 million people died. You’re gonna be in charge of infectious disease.” “And even EcoHealth, which was funding the research in Wuhan, finally sends a letter back to NIH and they say thank you for releasing the pause on our gain of function research.” Rand Paul

Holden Culotta

42,611 次观看 • 1 年前

"H5N1, historically, is very poorly transmissible in humans…The fear is, of course, that H5N1 would evolve in some way, it would be selected—or somebody would engineer it—to make it more infectious in humans." Robert W Malone, MD Researchers over a decade ago indeed conducted gain-of-function research on H5N1 and found four specific mutations that could make it more infectious in humans. And they published the details. It was controversial. And it contributed to the Obama White House pausing funding for gain of function research.

"H5N1, historically, is very poorly transmissible in humans…The fear is, of course, that H5N1 would evolve in some way, it would be selected—or somebody would engineer it—to make it more infectious in humans." Robert W Malone, MD Researchers over a decade ago indeed conducted gain-of-function research on H5N1 and found four specific mutations that could make it more infectious in humans. And they published the details. It was controversial. And it contributed to the Obama White House pausing funding for gain of function research.

Jan Jekielek

47,024 次观看 • 2 年前

It’s official. The US Govt funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab. That research resulted in the creation of Covid-19 by editing a coronavirus to infect humans. The US Govt is responsible for the death of millions. Where is the outrage?

It’s official. The US Govt funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab. That research resulted in the creation of Covid-19 by editing a coronavirus to infect humans. The US Govt is responsible for the death of millions. Where is the outrage?

Kim Dotcom

1,945,959 次观看 • 2 年前

Breaking: President Trump Stuns The World By Signing Executive Order Protecting Americans From Gain of Function Research Meanwhile HHS Secretary RFK Jr. And Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence Are Closing In On Indicting Tony Fauci For Illegal Gain Of Function Research: Alex Jones Responds

Breaking: President Trump Stuns The World By Signing Executive Order Protecting Americans From Gain of Function Research Meanwhile HHS Secretary RFK Jr. And Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence Are Closing In On Indicting Tony Fauci For Illegal Gain Of Function Research: Alex Jones Responds

Alex Jones

142,301 次观看 • 1 年前

Reminder: EcoHealth themselves thanked NIH for lifting the pause on their risky gain-of-function research. Fauci knows he lied to Congress when he claimed he did not fund gain-of-function research. And Joe Biden pardoned him for it.

Reminder: EcoHealth themselves thanked NIH for lifting the pause on their risky gain-of-function research. Fauci knows he lied to Congress when he claimed he did not fund gain-of-function research. And Joe Biden pardoned him for it.

Senator Rand Paul

14,958 次观看 • 1 年前

What nobody talks about is that Bird Flu was literally created out of The Athens, Georgia Poultry Diagnostic Research Center… and they released it. • it’s been around for decades • mortality rate of 52% in over 800 cases —— “but as the years passed, no ICU care, very late presentations, undernourished people. It’s a different game now in humans, we have anti-virals, antibiotics, we shouldn’t lose a single case.” • There are reportedly human cases today, Animal to Human: — 1 in Michigan — 1 in Australia — 2 in Texas 🔴 GAIN OF FUNCTION • We learned its gain of function research CLADE, which is the original source 23446, coming out of the USDA Athens Georgia Poultry Research Center.. —— CLADE: a group of organisms believed to have evolved from a common ancestor, according to the principles of cladistics. “it’s a man-made problem. They tried to do gain of function research through serial passage, but “accidentally” got it into Mallard Ducks, there must of been some ducks that “escaped”.

What nobody talks about is that Bird Flu was literally created out of The Athens, Georgia Poultry Diagnostic Research Center… and they released it. • it’s been around for decades • mortality rate of 52% in over 800 cases —— “but as the years passed, no ICU care, very late presentations, undernourished people. It’s a different game now in humans, we have anti-virals, antibiotics, we shouldn’t lose a single case.” • There are reportedly human cases today, Animal to Human: — 1 in Michigan — 1 in Australia — 2 in Texas 🔴 GAIN OF FUNCTION • We learned its gain of function research CLADE, which is the original source 23446, coming out of the USDA Athens Georgia Poultry Research Center.. —— CLADE: a group of organisms believed to have evolved from a common ancestor, according to the principles of cladistics. “it’s a man-made problem. They tried to do gain of function research through serial passage, but “accidentally” got it into Mallard Ducks, there must of been some ducks that “escaped”.

MJTruthUltra

33,767 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

🚨Sen. Rand Paul details one of MANY lies Anthony Fauci told the public: "On May 11, 2021, you told the Senate the NIH has never, ever, and does not now fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. When I gave you the opportunity to correct the record to reconsider the statement, you responded that you had never before lied to Congress. We were then told that only the government's narrowest regulation of definition counted here. That you could define gain-of-function in one way in which this was not gain-of-function, in which all of the common sense of the world be thrown out [...] But the real question is, was it dangerous? Was it a wise decision to fund this? And you haven't deviated from that. You've never admitted that it could have been a mistake, running this research in China. The American people were not asking for a semantics debate over what is gain-of-function. They were asking, does common sense say this research was dangerous in Wuhan? They wanted to know whether their money funded experiments in Wuhan that made bad coronavirus' better able to infect humans. The answer is, yes."

Townhall.com

28,282 次观看 • 9 天前