正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

INSANE: Watch SBI Agent Amanda Baker testifying that they didn’t bother testing key items left at the scene because “they belonged to one of Charlie Kirk’s security detail.” Of course! Because in the entire history of assassinations, the killer has never been someone close to the victim. It’s not... show more

The Dibster

27,785 subscribers

33,537 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

‼️The FBI REFUSED To DNA Test Abandoned Items On Shooter’s ESCAPE Route Because They Belonged To SOMEONE On Charlie Kirk’s Security Detail. 😡 During the preliminary hearing, Sergeant Jennifer Philomena testified that a backpack, jacket, and gloves were found abandoned at the bus stop near the Fulton Library — directly along the route the alleged shooter took after jumping off the Losee Center. These items were initially sent to the FBI for DNA testing. They were never tested. According to FBI agent Amanda Baker, the decision was made to stop testing because the items allegedly belonged to someone on Charlie Kirk’s own security detail. The items were then given back to that person. Both women appeared confused and had major memory lapses when questioned about who made that call and why. Candace pointed out the obvious: In 70-80% of homicides, the victim is killed by someone they know. So when evidence is found on the shooter’s escape route and it’s suddenly claimed to belong to someone close to the victim, why would you stop testing it? Why return it without confirmation? This is either gross incompetence or something far more deliberate. Either way, it stinks. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

‼️The FBI REFUSED To DNA Test Abandoned Items On Shooter’s ESCAPE Route Because They Belonged To SOMEONE On Charlie Kirk’s Security Detail. 😡 During the preliminary hearing, Sergeant Jennifer Philomena testified that a backpack, jacket, and gloves were found abandoned at the bus stop near the Fulton Library — directly along the route the alleged shooter took after jumping off the Losee Center. These items were initially sent to the FBI for DNA testing. They were never tested. According to FBI agent Amanda Baker, the decision was made to stop testing because the items allegedly belonged to someone on Charlie Kirk’s own security detail. The items were then given back to that person. Both women appeared confused and had major memory lapses when questioned about who made that call and why. Candace pointed out the obvious: In 70-80% of homicides, the victim is killed by someone they know. So when evidence is found on the shooter’s escape route and it’s suddenly claimed to belong to someone close to the victim, why would you stop testing it? Why return it without confirmation? This is either gross incompetence or something far more deliberate. Either way, it stinks. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

91,528 次观看 • 1 个月前

Interestingly, in China, one man dared to stop dozens of tanks because he knew the PLA would not hurt him - he left safely in the end. In the US, dozens of men/women dare NOT even stop one police car because they knows they will be killed by US police.

Interestingly, in China, one man dared to stop dozens of tanks because he knew the PLA would not hurt him - he left safely in the end. In the US, dozens of men/women dare NOT even stop one police car because they knows they will be killed by US police.

ShanghaiPanda （ Account deactivation）

600,604 次观看 • 3 年前

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Irlandarra

56,162 次观看 • 2 个月前

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s pastor Rob McCoy on the 'why' behind everything that Charlie Kirk did: "The why brought him the courage. The why brought him the wisdom and the strength. The why is the one that Charlie wanted to welcome as the guest of honor." “Charlie wanted his Savior to be the guest of honor." “Charlie was never afraid because he knew his life was secure in the hand of God.”

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s pastor Rob McCoy on the 'why' behind everything that Charlie Kirk did: "The why brought him the courage. The why brought him the wisdom and the strength. The why is the one that Charlie wanted to welcome as the guest of honor." “Charlie wanted his Savior to be the guest of honor." “Charlie was never afraid because he knew his life was secure in the hand of God.”

Fox News

117,603 次观看 • 11 个月前

They are attacking random people in the streets because of their clothes. They believed this guy was an ICE agent and they attacked him. Walz has allowed his state to become lawless and the innocent citizens are paying the price. Mind you had this been an actual agent he would have been beat by this crowd. None of this is peaceful.

They are attacking random people in the streets because of their clothes. They believed this guy was an ICE agent and they attacked him. Walz has allowed his state to become lawless and the innocent citizens are paying the price. Mind you had this been an actual agent he would have been beat by this crowd. None of this is peaceful.

Sadie

37,760 次观看 • 7 个月前

🔥🤔Hmmm… Sure seems like Tyler Robinson’s defense team is primarily concerned about avoiding the DEATH PENALTY in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. “The fact that people saw Mr. Robinson wandering around Campus before the rally occurred doesn’t mean he knew children were present at the time” “Of course apply to the all of the VICTIM TARGETING I’m sorry not the victim targeting but the presence of a child enhancements.” - Robinson defense They want the charge dropped on Robinson’s knowledge saying he was NOT aware kids were present just because he when walked the grounds earlier there were NOT kids present it seems. You can do the rest of the math.

🔥🤔Hmmm… Sure seems like Tyler Robinson’s defense team is primarily concerned about avoiding the DEATH PENALTY in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. “The fact that people saw Mr. Robinson wandering around Campus before the rally occurred doesn’t mean he knew children were present at the time” “Of course apply to the all of the VICTIM TARGETING I’m sorry not the victim targeting but the presence of a child enhancements.” - Robinson defense They want the charge dropped on Robinson’s knowledge saying he was NOT aware kids were present just because he when walked the grounds earlier there were NOT kids present it seems. You can do the rest of the math.

Johnny St.Pete

88,135 次观看 • 12 天前

You know why Charlie Kirk is dominating the news cycle in his death at 31? It’s not because he was the greatest church growth guy or evangelist—it’s because he Yattiyr’ed right where God placed him. That Hebrew word, “Yattiyr,” means “to excel, to stand out, to be extraordinary”—and that’s exactly what Charlie did in the realm of youth, education, and political engagement. He never went to college, just like Rush Limbaugh didn’t, which only proves the excellence was of God, not of man. He fused his faith with his cultural mandate and boldly challenged the propaganda machine on campuses, teaching young people how to think, not what to think. Like Stephen in the Book of Acts, he became such a powerful witness that his enemies couldn’t refute the spirit or the wisdom by which he spoke. He humiliated the lies of darkness on TikTok and YouTube so effectively that hell had to hit the panic button. That’s why people sense a conspiracy—because in the spirit realm, there was one. And now there's a massive hole in the battlefield—a vacancy at the top of the Yattiyr class. God is handing out battlefield promotions, and the question is: will you step into the space Charlie left behind?

You know why Charlie Kirk is dominating the news cycle in his death at 31? It’s not because he was the greatest church growth guy or evangelist—it’s because he Yattiyr’ed right where God placed him. That Hebrew word, “Yattiyr,” means “to excel, to stand out, to be extraordinary”—and that’s exactly what Charlie did in the realm of youth, education, and political engagement. He never went to college, just like Rush Limbaugh didn’t, which only proves the excellence was of God, not of man. He fused his faith with his cultural mandate and boldly challenged the propaganda machine on campuses, teaching young people how to think, not what to think. Like Stephen in the Book of Acts, he became such a powerful witness that his enemies couldn’t refute the spirit or the wisdom by which he spoke. He humiliated the lies of darkness on TikTok and YouTube so effectively that hell had to hit the panic button. That’s why people sense a conspiracy—because in the spirit realm, there was one. And now there's a massive hole in the battlefield—a vacancy at the top of the Yattiyr class. God is handing out battlefield promotions, and the question is: will you step into the space Charlie left behind?

Lance Wallnau

129,057 次观看 • 1 年前

“I left Test cricket because I felt my team didn’t want me to be a part of the team. They weren’t welcoming.” ~Virat Kohli 😲 Mohammad Kaif: “Virat Kohli has left the Test format, which is very disheartening. Recently, I saw his statement where he said that he left the format because he wasn’t feeling welcomed by his team and felt that they didn’t want him to be a part of the team. So, is that the reason he left the Test format? Otherwise, he knew how difficult and important the format was. He always wanted to set an example for the world that this is the real format, and this is the format I can play.”

“I left Test cricket because I felt my team didn’t want me to be a part of the team. They weren’t welcoming.” ~Virat Kohli 😲 Mohammad Kaif: “Virat Kohli has left the Test format, which is very disheartening. Recently, I saw his statement where he said that he left the format because he wasn’t feeling welcomed by his team and felt that they didn’t want him to be a part of the team. So, is that the reason he left the Test format? Otherwise, he knew how difficult and important the format was. He always wanted to set an example for the world that this is the real format, and this is the format I can play.”

Kshitij

57,514 次观看 • 4 天前

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.

🚨In Key West, an ICE/Border Patrol agent threatened to PULL A U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THE CAR because he cursed at an agent… then had the audacity to tell the U.S. citizen to “learn your laws.” So, let’s learn them. In the video, Border Patrol agents pulled over a car of U.S. citizens and demanded everyone hand over their IDs. When the passenger says, “Bitch, fuck you,” an agent asks what he said and then threatens to pull him out of the vehicle if he “says one more thing like that.” The passenger correctly asks: “For what? That’s freedom of speech.” The agent responds: “That’s not how that works. Learn your laws.” Oh, we’re going to… Cursing at a government agent is not, by itself, a crime. The First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism, insults, and profanity directed at law enforcement, as long as it is not a physical threat. The government cannot punish people simply for verbally challenging or criticizing law enforcement. And it gets even worse. After the passenger calls the agent a “fucking white cracker,” the agent asks what he called him… and then tells another agent he is “thinking of calling in and arresting this guy.” For what? Because he hurt your feelings? The government does not get to arrest someone for speech they don’t like. And yes, Border Patrol has special authority near the border. That includes operating immigration checkpoints where agents can briefly stop vehicles, without individualized reasonable suspicion, for immigration questioning. But, that is different from a roving patrol stop. When not operating at a checkpoint, Border Patrol needs reasonable suspicion to pull over a vehicle for immigration questioning. And even at a checkpoint, the agents’ authority is not unlimited. A checkpoint stop does not automatically give them the right to search the vehicle, indefinitely detain people, or arrest someone because they said something an agent didn’t like. The Constitution does not say… “You have freedom of speech, unless a federal agent gets offended.” It says the government cannot punish you for exercising that right. And perhaps the most important part of this entire video is… The passenger knew his rights better than the federal agent threatening him. The agent told the U.S. citizen to learn his laws… But maybe the agent should have learned them first.

Jesus Freakin Congress

332,312 次观看 • 1 个月前

🔥🤔 “ TO FIRE someone because he told a JOKE about the President repeatedly he didn’t like..to fire him because he was INARFTUL about his words in the wake of the killing of Charlie Kirk” Nobody was fired..his own company suspended him for LYING PURPOSELY to say it was done by a MAGA “ONE OF THEIR OWN” is NOT “INARFTUL” it is intentional and deceiving the public. And you ALL KNOW THAT & so does your complicit MSM lapdogs. There is only ONE martyr here & it’s not your false one Jimmy Kimmel…it’s Charlie Kirk.

🔥🤔 “ TO FIRE someone because he told a JOKE about the President repeatedly he didn’t like..to fire him because he was INARFTUL about his words in the wake of the killing of Charlie Kirk” Nobody was fired..his own company suspended him for LYING PURPOSELY to say it was done by a MAGA “ONE OF THEIR OWN” is NOT “INARFTUL” it is intentional and deceiving the public. And you ALL KNOW THAT & so does your complicit MSM lapdogs. There is only ONE martyr here & it’s not your false one Jimmy Kimmel…it’s Charlie Kirk.

Johnny St.Pete

569,972 次观看 • 11 个月前

🔥Smells like PANIC. "RECOGNIZE THAT JAMES COMEY IS THE VICTIM OF THE WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNMENT..He's being prosecuted because DJT doesn't like him..Bolton is being investigated because DJT doesn't like him" - Mark Elias FEAR & A MELTDOWN BY MARK ELIAS WHO FUNDED THE STEEL DOSSIER, lawfare Trump & accepted money for the Steele Dossier ..funneled a million to FUSION GPS. They are terrified because ALL of the corruption they accused President Trump of is what they themselves are guilty of. Everyone underestimated the RESOLVE of President Trump. They have been so used to walking between the raindrops since 2009. Now they know what it feels like to put people through what they put Trump and his people through. And it’s JUST THE START.

🔥Smells like PANIC. "RECOGNIZE THAT JAMES COMEY IS THE VICTIM OF THE WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNMENT..He's being prosecuted because DJT doesn't like him..Bolton is being investigated because DJT doesn't like him" - Mark Elias FEAR & A MELTDOWN BY MARK ELIAS WHO FUNDED THE STEEL DOSSIER, lawfare Trump & accepted money for the Steele Dossier ..funneled a million to FUSION GPS. They are terrified because ALL of the corruption they accused President Trump of is what they themselves are guilty of. Everyone underestimated the RESOLVE of President Trump. They have been so used to walking between the raindrops since 2009. Now they know what it feels like to put people through what they put Trump and his people through. And it’s JUST THE START.

Johnny St.Pete

149,838 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

🚨BREAKING: An ICE/Border Patrol agent approached a U.S. citizen’s car, opened the door without permission, took his keys, threatened to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, and STILL refused to return his keys after he showed his U.S. PASSPORT. And then, the agent admitted ON CAMERA that the entire detention was unlawful. And here is what makes this even more disturbing… At no point did the agent claim this man committed an actual crime, but still threatened to arrest him. He was just a person who pulled over near a federal immigration operation. And because of that, the agent walked up to his vehicle, opened his door, took his keys, and threatened to put him in jail unless he proved he was a U.S. citizen. Which is not how constitutional rights work. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. The U.S. citizen repeatedly asked… “Why am I being detained?” The agent first claimed he was “suspected of being illegal.” But, they didn’t have evidence to back that claim. And even after showing his U.S. PASSPORT, they refused to give him his keys back… When the U.S. citizen continued questioning why he was detained… the justification changed. Now, the agent claims he was supposedly “impeding an immigration investigation.” The man asked, “How did I impede?” The agent answered, “You pulled up right here.” That was the reason… He pulled over. The man asked, “Did I walk over there?” The agent said, “No.” “You walked to me.” The agent admitted to that. The man never left his car. He never blocked agents. He never interfered with an arrest. He pulled over… and the agent came to him. And note, the issue was never that agent told the U.S. citizen to leave… Then, after failing to justify an excuse for stealing this U.S. citizen’s keys, and threatening to arrest him if he didn’t prove his citizenship, the agent said he detained him because… “You are their boss and you hire illegal aliens.” So, the agent’s justification was not that this U.S. citizen committed a crime, it was that he was connected to people they were investigating. This is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because if law enforcement can decide someone “looks suspicious,” demand proof of citizenship, seized their property, and threaten to arrest them until they comply with unlawful orders, those rights mean nothing. People have a right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures… regardless of their appearance, their ethnicity, or who they know. And this agent’s own words expose him: He didn’t stop this man. He didn’t pull him over. He didn’t catch him committing a crime. He approached a U.S. citizen, unlawfully detained him, and then tried to justify it afterward.

Jesus Freakin Congress

143,238 次观看 • 1 个月前

"When was the moment you knew that you feel in love with him" "it's so hard to pinpoint that because like we're on the radio and I am just like getting shy all of sudden but he's one of those people as soon you meet him you kinda know he's the best and there is no one on the planet that is ever been remotely similar to him he is like one of one"

"When was the moment you knew that you feel in love with him" "it's so hard to pinpoint that because like we're on the radio and I am just like getting shy all of sudden but he's one of those people as soon you meet him you kinda know he's the best and there is no one on the planet that is ever been remotely similar to him he is like one of one"

tayvis throwbacks

58,192 次观看 • 1 个月前

Mehdi Hasan on Hasan Piker: “The idea that he is the single biggest threat to American jews right now is insane when you have a card-carrying antisemite in the White House. The reason they don’t like Hasan Piker is not because of antisemitism, it’s because of his anti-Zionism. If they were really bothered by antisemitism, they would be looking at the real threat from antisemitism which is the far right”

Mehdi Hasan on Hasan Piker: “The idea that he is the single biggest threat to American jews right now is insane when you have a card-carrying antisemite in the White House. The reason they don’t like Hasan Piker is not because of antisemitism, it’s because of his anti-Zionism. If they were really bothered by antisemitism, they would be looking at the real threat from antisemitism which is the far right”

Marco Foster

237,685 次观看 • 5 个月前

Steve Jobs on working with incredibly talented people “When you’ve got incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand, if you don’t treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes,” Steve Jobs explains. “So this strange thing happens where the hierarchy of power inverts, and the CEO is actually at the bottom.” He continues: “So I feel like I work for most of these people because they’re the ones who are doing all of the brilliant work . . . The best people are very hard to come by, so it’s management’s job to support them because they’re on the frontlines doing the work. So that’s kind of how we run [Pixar].”

Steve Jobs on working with incredibly talented people “When you’ve got incredibly talented people that are also rare and in demand, if you don’t treat them right, they can go get another job in 10 minutes,” Steve Jobs explains. “So this strange thing happens where the hierarchy of power inverts, and the CEO is actually at the bottom.” He continues: “So I feel like I work for most of these people because they’re the ones who are doing all of the brilliant work . . . The best people are very hard to come by, so it’s management’s job to support them because they’re on the frontlines doing the work. So that’s kind of how we run [Pixar].”

Startup Archive

177,267 次观看 • 9 个月前

Kelsey Grammer: The Left couldn’t stop Trump so now they’re after us Grammer: “Donald Trump’s not standing in the gap anymore. He can’t protect us. They dished out everything they could give him. They tried to kill him twice. They tried to imprison him for life. They tried to impeach him twice. He stood there bravely and took everything of it. And we all voted for him because he was still standing at the end of the day. We actually voted for him because of the left. But now they’re after us.”

Kelsey Grammer: The Left couldn’t stop Trump so now they’re after us Grammer: “Donald Trump’s not standing in the gap anymore. He can’t protect us. They dished out everything they could give him. They tried to kill him twice. They tried to imprison him for life. They tried to impeach him twice. He stood there bravely and took everything of it. And we all voted for him because he was still standing at the end of the day. We actually voted for him because of the left. But now they’re after us.”

jay plemons

1,074,418 次观看 • 8 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Hillary Clinton wants new leaders in Israel: "The Israeli people have to decide who their leaders are. I hope, like the people of Hungary, they realize that their economy has been undermined, their unity within Israel has been put at risk, and their security and safety are not yet what they need to be, because they have leadership that is not going to, act in the best interests of Israel and the future of Israel."

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Hillary Clinton wants new leaders in Israel: "The Israeli people have to decide who their leaders are. I hope, like the people of Hungary, they realize that their economy has been undermined, their unity within Israel has been put at risk, and their security and safety are not yet what they need to be, because they have leadership that is not going to, act in the best interests of Israel and the future of Israel."

DD Geopolitics

23,231 次观看 • 5 个月前

Conway: One of the advantages that Trump has had is we’ve seen less of him. One of the reasons I think the race seems closer than it will ultimately be is that people have forgotten about Trump. They’ve forgotten the reasons they didn’t like him. They’ve forgotten the reasons why his own WH staff in the Spring of 2020 had to pull him out of those COVID briefings and end them because they were so bad and harmful to his image because he would say such insane things. The more you see of him, the more you say ‘what is wrong with him?’ He’s really off the rails and people need to see that.

Conway: One of the advantages that Trump has had is we’ve seen less of him. One of the reasons I think the race seems closer than it will ultimately be is that people have forgotten about Trump. They’ve forgotten the reasons they didn’t like him. They’ve forgotten the reasons why his own WH staff in the Spring of 2020 had to pull him out of those COVID briefings and end them because they were so bad and harmful to his image because he would say such insane things. The more you see of him, the more you say ‘what is wrong with him?’ He’s really off the rails and people need to see that.

Acyn

617,083 次观看 • 2 年前