Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

INSIGHTS: 🇪🇺 The Digital Euro needs one thing above all else. Interoperability. Between banks. Between blockchains. Between borders. Quant Network's Overledger provides exactly that. ECB selected Quant. Now European banks are integrating directly. 440 million potential users. One infrastructure layer. The most important crypto projects are the ones nobody...

MerlijnTrader's profile picture

Merlijn The Trader

430,617 subscribers

40,733 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING Ripple XRP NEWS: European Central Bank (ECB) leaked confirmation of tokenized securities as eligible collateral starting March 30, 2026 – and it's built on XRP Ledger PLUS bond issuance and MUCH MORE! Plus, Quant Overledger(QNT) PROVIDES the programmability and interoperability for the Digital Euro & the WORLD! Don't miss the full breakdown! MUST WATCH MY FRIEND!
26:02

BREAKING Ripple XRP NEWS: European Central Bank (ECB) leaked confirmation of tokenized securities as eligible collateral starting March 30, 2026 – and it's built on XRP Ledger PLUS bond issuance and MUCH MORE! Plus, Quant Overledger(QNT) PROVIDES the programmability and interoperability for the Digital Euro & the WORLD! Don't miss the full breakdown! MUST WATCH MY FRIEND!

Apex Crypto Insights (NFA)

28,541 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨XRP, XLM, HBAR & QNT BREAKING NEWS!!! (DIGITAL EURO ON RIPPLE, STELLAR, HEDERA & QUANT!)🚨 Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, just announced that the ECB will start Project Pontes, a Digital Euro powered by Distributed Ledger Technology. And this is why the Digital Euro could be powered by Ripple ($XRP), @Stellar_Org (stellar:native), Hedera (hedera-hashgraph:native), & @Quant_Network ($QNT)!👁 #XRP #XLM #HBAR #QNT #Crypto #Altcoins
16:37

🚨XRP, XLM, HBAR & QNT BREAKING NEWS!!! (DIGITAL EURO ON RIPPLE, STELLAR, HEDERA & QUANT!)🚨 Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank, just announced that the ECB will start Project Pontes, a Digital Euro powered by Distributed Ledger Technology. And this is why the Digital Euro could be powered by Ripple ($XRP), @Stellar_Org (stellar:native), Hedera (hedera-hashgraph:native), & @Quant_Network ($QNT)!👁 #XRP #XLM #HBAR #QNT #Crypto #Altcoins

Crypto X AiMan

14,846 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇪🇺HUGE: The company auto-converting your USDT is piloting the digital euro. On August 31st, Revolut will automatically convert all USDT held by 40 MILLION European users into fiat. The ECB selected Revolut as one of 36 digital euro pilot providers in July.
0:41

Sensitive content

🇪🇺HUGE: The company auto-converting your USDT is piloting the digital euro. On August 31st, Revolut will automatically convert all USDT held by 40 MILLION European users into fiat. The ECB selected Revolut as one of 36 digital euro pilot providers in July.

Coin Bureau

67,880 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Could Quant be the connective tissue of the new financial system? Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) explains why Quant’s role in interoperability, ISO standards and CBDC infrastructure could be much bigger than most people realize. #QNT #Quant
0:57

Could Quant be the connective tissue of the new financial system? Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) explains why Quant’s role in interoperability, ISO standards and CBDC infrastructure could be much bigger than most people realize. #QNT #Quant

ALLINCRYPTO

11,134 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨XRP & QNT holders, listen 🔊carefully! Jooyni Sung - Head of Digital Security Infrastructure Team of The Bank of Korea (Central Bank of South Korea) points out the need to fixing slow, expensive cross-border payments and reducing reliance on correspondent banks. That is the same basic problem Ripple has targeted for years! Ripple/XRP’s role is different, though: it can act as a bridge asset between currencies, while Project Agorá focuses on tokenized central-bank money and commercial-bank deposits. Quant/QNT also plays a different role: How so? Agustín Carstens of The BIS, also talks about building a framework where central-bank money, tokenized bank deposits, and eventually other tokenized assets can work together. That is where Quant overlaps most strongly. Overledger is designed to act like a connector between different blockchains, bank systems, and payment networks, rather than forcing everything onto one ledger. So the easiest way to think about it is: 🏦 Agorá = shared infrastructure for tokenized bank money ⚡ XRP = liquidity bridge between different currencies/networks 🔗 Quant = technology that can connect different ledgers and systems The research speaks for itself with documents and findings from SMQKE and Sebastian!! Well done! 🤝*Full video 👇*
1:48

🚨XRP & QNT holders, listen 🔊carefully! Jooyni Sung - Head of Digital Security Infrastructure Team of The Bank of Korea (Central Bank of South Korea) points out the need to fixing slow, expensive cross-border payments and reducing reliance on correspondent banks. That is the same basic problem Ripple has targeted for years! Ripple/XRP’s role is different, though: it can act as a bridge asset between currencies, while Project Agorá focuses on tokenized central-bank money and commercial-bank deposits. Quant/QNT also plays a different role: How so? Agustín Carstens of The BIS, also talks about building a framework where central-bank money, tokenized bank deposits, and eventually other tokenized assets can work together. That is where Quant overlaps most strongly. Overledger is designed to act like a connector between different blockchains, bank systems, and payment networks, rather than forcing everything onto one ledger. So the easiest way to think about it is: 🏦 Agorá = shared infrastructure for tokenized bank money ⚡ XRP = liquidity bridge between different currencies/networks 🔗 Quant = technology that can connect different ledgers and systems The research speaks for itself with documents and findings from SMQKE and Sebastian!! Well done! 🤝*Full video 👇*

MaximusCrypto

12,746 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

THE CLARITY ACT IS THE ROADMAP EVERYONE IS WAITING ON "Everyone needs the clarity of the Clarity Act. Once you get it, it's the green light. They're all waiting for what exactly is. Which things are securities, which are not, how does it all work?" Raoul Pal explains that the CLARITY Act is the green light that banks and TradFi are waiting for to jump into crypto. Once the Clarity Act is passed, all of the banks will start building out their crypto rails for everything.
1:09

THE CLARITY ACT IS THE ROADMAP EVERYONE IS WAITING ON "Everyone needs the clarity of the Clarity Act. Once you get it, it's the green light. They're all waiting for what exactly is. Which things are securities, which are not, how does it all work?" Raoul Pal explains that the CLARITY Act is the green light that banks and TradFi are waiting for to jump into crypto. Once the Clarity Act is passed, all of the banks will start building out their crypto rails for everything.

CryptosRus

64,372 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

$QNT BOMBSHELL! My biggest video ever! Here comes the 4th Industrial Age(The Tokenization & Blockchain Age! Quant Fusion Launch EXPOSED! Quant Overledger Fusion "Bring Your Own Node" launch is here and it's going to change everything. This is the interoperability operating system that connects all legacy banking systems, blockchains, CBDCs, tokenized assets and enterprises seamlessly - exactly like Windows did for the internet age.
22:54

$QNT BOMBSHELL! My biggest video ever! Here comes the 4th Industrial Age(The Tokenization & Blockchain Age! Quant Fusion Launch EXPOSED! Quant Overledger Fusion "Bring Your Own Node" launch is here and it's going to change everything. This is the interoperability operating system that connects all legacy banking systems, blockchains, CBDCs, tokenized assets and enterprises seamlessly - exactly like Windows did for the internet age.

Apex Crypto Insights (NFA)

12,408 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: European Central Bank European Central Bank President CONFIRMS Digital Euro on Ripple ($XRP), Hedera ($HBAR) & ($QNT)?! 👀💣 This is BIGGER than you think... 👁️ The new financial system is here! 💸 #Crypto #ECB #Ripple #Hedera #Quant #CBDC
4:48

🚨BREAKING: European Central Bank European Central Bank President CONFIRMS Digital Euro on Ripple ($XRP), Hedera ($HBAR) & ($QNT)?! 👀💣 This is BIGGER than you think... 👁️ The new financial system is here! 💸 #Crypto #ECB #Ripple #Hedera #Quant #CBDC

Crypto X AiMan

69,021 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most people look at $QNT and ask, “How high can the price go?” I start with a completely different question: what happens if banks in different countries start issuing tokenized money on different systems and all of those systems need to talk to each other? Warning: this one is LONG. Probably one of my deepest $QNT posts yet. Give me a few minutes and read the whole thing. It’ll be worth it. That question led me straight back to The Clearing House. And once you understand the architecture The Clearing House is building, the entire Quant thesis starts making a lot more sense. The Clearing House is one of the most important pieces of U.S. banking infrastructure. It is owned by 25 banks. Its CHIPS network has 43 direct participants. CHIPS settles more than $2T in average value each business day. During 2025 it processed around $2.014T in average daily payments. Its liquidity efficiency was around 26:1. So when I talk about The Clearing House moving toward tokenized deposits, understand the scale. This is not a crypto company trying to get banks interested. These are banking rails banks already use. Now they are preparing those rails for tokenized commercial bank money. On August 24, 2026, The Clearing House published a discussion with Chief Strategy Officer Sal Karakaplan. The message was simple but extremely important. Banks using CHIPS and RTP already have their settlement infrastructure. They already maintain funds. They already have liquidity processes. They already have payment connectivity. So tokenized deposits should not force them to rebuild everything. Instead, tokenized transactions can be tightly connected with the systems they already use. That one idea is massive. Because the biggest obstacle to institutional blockchain adoption has always been disruption. Banks do not want to throw away working infrastructure. They want new capability without destroying the old system. Now fast-forward one month. September 24, 2026. The Clearing House selects Quant. Quant becomes the announced technology provider for: Interoperability. Orchestration. Transaction management. Quant also brings Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service. So imagine the future banking system. Bank A issues tokenized dollars on one ledger. Bank B uses another private network. Bank C wants programmable deposits but has not built its own blockchain system. A tokenized-securities platform needs cash settlement. A treasury platform needs programmable payments. A public blockchain contains tokenized assets. CHIPS remains the regulated high-value dollar settlement network. RTP handles real-time payments. These systems are different. But the money still needs to move between them. Quant’s job is to coordinate that complexity. I think this is much bigger than “blockchain interoperability.” This is financial-system interoperability. And the banks around The Clearing House initiative show how serious it is. JPMorgan Chase. Citi. Bank of America. HSBC. BNY. Wells Fargo. Santander. TD Bank. Then: BMO. Citizens. Fifth Third. Huntington. KeyBank. PNC. Regions. Truist. The comments from these institutions focused on exactly the problems Quant wants to solve. Tokenized-deposit clearing. Interbank connectivity. Trusted financial infrastructure. Interoperability. Programmable payments. Connecting blockchain capability with existing payment rails. The Clearing House subsequently chose Quant. That gives Quant a completely different distribution opportunity. Instead of selling software one bank at a time, Quant is now inside an initiative connected to an institution already serving major banks. That can shorten the path to institutional adoption dramatically. Then look at what Quant has already done in Britain. The Great British Tokenised Deposit initiative gives us a preview. Quant was selected in September 2025. One year later, seven banks had completed live customer transactions. The names: Barclays HSBC UK Lloyds Banking Group Monzo Nationwide NatWest Santander These transactions involved real money. Mortgage completions. A marketplace purchase. Funds could be reserved and released when conditions were met. This is programmable commercial bank money doing actual work. Now compare the timeline. UK Quant selection: September 2025. UK live customer transactions: September 2026. U.S. Quant selection by The Clearing House: September 2026. U.S. network targeted for availability: H1 2027. I see a pattern. Quant builds. Banks test. Transactions go live. Then the model expands to another market. Now layer international interoperability on top. In October 2026, Quant participated directly in the UK Finance Tokenised Markets and Money Conference. The discussion involved how tokenized-deposit initiatives from countries including the UK, Japan, the U.S. and Germany could connect. The industry is talking about: Standards. Rulebooks. Overlapping bank participation. Commercial corridors. Synchronized settlement. Payment-versus-payment. That is the future Quant has been preparing for. People sometimes think tokenization will simplify finance because everything moves onto one blockchain. I think the opposite can happen. Tokenization can create even more systems. Every major bank may have its own approach. Countries may build national frameworks. Central banks may support separate settlement infrastructure. Private asset ledgers will exist. Public blockchains will exist. Commercial bank deposit tokens will exist. Stablecoins will exist. Digital securities will exist. The technology becomes more diverse. The need for coordination becomes bigger. That is where a “network of networks” becomes valuable. Think about U.S.-UK payments. The U.S. bank has tokenized dollars. The UK bank has tokenized sterling. Both have domestic rules. Both have their own settlement rails. Both need foreign exchange. Both need confirmation. Both need compliance. Both need the cash and asset legs synchronized. Quant already has technology connected to both banking environments. I think that gives it an incredibly interesting strategic position. And I am not stopping at deposits. Look at Murex. Murex runs MX.3, widely used in institutional trading, risk management and post-trade operations. In March 2026, Murex and Quant announced an integration. Quant’s programmable money infrastructure can work alongside MX.3. Now banks can potentially handle tokenized deposits and digital bonds without changing the core institutional workflow they already use. This matters because tokenized assets need money. A digital bond cannot settle itself. A tokenized fund still needs subscriptions and redemptions. Tokenized collateral still needs financing. Tokenized securities still need delivery-versus-payment. If the asset moves but the cash cannot move with it, the system is incomplete. Quant is working across both sides. Asset systems. Money systems. Institutional software. Interoperability. That creates more commercial opportunities. Now I want to talk about token utility because this is where a lot of crypto research gets lazy. The Clearing House settling $2T does not mean $2T buys QNT. I care about a different mechanism. QNT is documented as an access and licensing token. Overledger subscribers can pay platform fees in USD or QNT. Historical licensing models used QNT for annual mainnet licensing. The 2026 MiCA disclosure also describes QNT utilization and locking in licensing arrangements. So institutional growth can potentially create token demand through access rather than through the gross dollar value of payments. That model makes more sense to me. If one bank moves $100B using Quant infrastructure, QNT does not need to absorb $100B. Quant needs commercial contracts. Licensing. Platform access. Network services. Potential token commitments. If the number of institutions keeps increasing, those commitments can compound. I care even more about locking. One-time purchases can come back to market. Locked tokens cannot. If enterprise arrangements require QNT to remain committed for periods of time, liquid supply can tighten. Then incoming demand has fewer freely available tokens to compete for. And QNT supply is already small. Roughly 14.56M circulating. Around 14.61M total supply in the data used for this research. That scarcity matters. Then add Fusion. Fusion launched on mainnet in June 2026. It initially connected 74 networks. Its Trusted Node Program gives institutions more control around who processes transactions. QNT has a documented staking role. So now I can see a second demand channel. Overledger and enterprise licensing create one path. Fusion execution and staking create another. If both scale together, QNT becomes much more interesting. Think of the potential progression. Bank joins Quant infrastructure. Bank or service provider needs platform access. Access creates licensing economics. Some licensing arrangements involve QNT usage or locking. Meanwhile, institutional networks connect through Fusion. Trusted nodes stake QNT. Network execution grows. More QNT becomes tied to productive use. Supply stays around 14.6M. That is the flywheel I want. We are not fully there yet. The exact QNT economics attached to The Clearing House contract have not been publicly disclosed. But the general utility already exists. That makes public confirmation of recurring institutional QNT demand one of the biggest catalysts I am waiting for. Now do the valuation math. Using about 14.61M tokens: $5B valuation = ~$342 QNT $10B = ~$684 $20B = ~$1,369 $30B = ~$2,053 $50B = ~$3,422 Again, these are valuation scenarios. They are useful because they show what QNT’s scarcity does when the market cap expands. The question becomes: What valuation would investors assign to a token if Quant becomes recurring infrastructure for bank-issued digital money? I think $10B becomes much easier to discuss if we see meaningful commercial bank onboarding, recurring QNT-linked revenue, rising activity and token commitments. Higher scenarios need even more. International usage. Multiple national banking systems. Cross-border network connectivity. Large-scale Fusion adoption. Material staking. Recurring institutional contracts. That is what I want to watch. And the catalysts are already lined up. 1. The Clearing House network opening in H1 2027. The partnership moves closer to real commercial usage. 2. U.S. bank onboarding. More institutions can mean more Quant products being used. 3. Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service. Banks that do not want to build token infrastructure themselves can still participate. 4. QNT-linked enterprise licensing. This is where institutional adoption can begin translating more directly into token demand. 5. Great British Tokenised Deposit expansion. The UK already has live transactions. More banks and more use cases would strengthen the proof. 6. U.S.-UK interoperability. Both national banking environments already have Quant technology involved. 7. Fusion trusted-node adoption. More nodes can mean more staking. 8. Fusion transaction growth. More execution can increase ongoing QNT utility. 9. Murex MX.3 integration. Tokenized bonds and institutional settlement open another market. 10. Delivery-versus-payment. Tokenized cash and tokenized securities can move together. 11. Corporate treasury automation. Conditional payments and programmable liquidity become real business use cases. 12. International network-of-networks development. This is the monster opportunity. Multiple national financial systems using Quant to coordinate transactions. Now zoom out globally. Britain already has live tokenized-deposit customer transactions. The United States has The Clearing House preparing its initiative with Quant. Europe has launched the first phase of Pontes for wholesale tokenized-asset settlement using central bank money. And international banking discussions are focusing on cross-border connectivity. Pontes is not currently an announced Quant project. I am not claiming it is. But Europe moving in the same broad direction matters. Because every new financial network increases the need for interoperability. The future is not going to be one giant blockchain. It will probably look more like the internet. Different networks. Different systems. Different protocols. Different organizations. Still able to communicate. Quant wants to become part of the layer making that possible for financial institutions. And the thing I like most is that Quant is approaching banks without asking them to abandon what already works. That is a huge advantage. Banks already have CHIPS. They already have RTP. They already have Murex. They already have internal ledgers. They already have compliance systems. Quant can sit between those systems. That is a much easier institutional pitch than saying: “Throw away your current infrastructure and put everything on our chain.” This is why I think Quant has a chance to scale differently from many crypto networks. It is not competing to be the one ledger every bank uses. It is monetizing the fact that banks will use many ledgers. More fragmentation can actually increase the value of Quant. Think about that. If JPMorgan has one system. Citi has another. HSBC has another. A public blockchain hosts an asset. A central bank runs the final settlement layer. Murex manages trading. The Clearing House manages interbank payment infrastructure. Every connection between those pieces becomes an interoperability problem. Quant sells the solution to that problem. That is the business. Now think about $QNT. If those commercial connections increasingly require QNT for access, licensing, locking, execution or staking, the token begins reflecting that business growth. That is the bridge between the technology thesis and the investment thesis. And because QNT supply is small, the potential asymmetry is what keeps me interested. A lot of people saw QNT at $60. Then $100. Then $200. Then over $300. They only started asking questions after price moved. I prefer studying the infrastructure before the crowd starts chasing the chart. Right now I’m watching the next phase. Can The Clearing House deliver the H1 2027 network? How many banks participate? How much transaction activity appears? Does TDaaS expand the customer base? Does the UK system grow? Does cross-border interoperability become commercial? Does Murex bring Quant deeper into digital bonds and securities? Does Fusion gain institutional trusted nodes? Does QNT staking grow? Do enterprise licenses create recurring QNT demand? Those are the questions that matter. And if several of those answers become “yes,” the QNT story gets much bigger. I see Quant’s future in three steps. First: Become infrastructure banks trust. The UK and U.S. partnerships are doing that. Second: Become infrastructure banks repeatedly use. Commercial tokenized deposits, settlement, securities and treasury activity can do that. Third: Convert that usage into measurable QNT economics. Licensing. Locking. Execution. Staking. That final step is where I think the market could dramatically reprice QNT. I am bullish today because stage one is no longer imaginary. Quant has already delivered the UK banking infrastructure. The Clearing House already selected Quant. Murex already partnered with Quant. Fusion is already live. QNT utility is already documented. The banking industry is already talking about a network of networks. Everything does not need to happen tomorrow. I am looking years ahead. I want Quant sitting in the middle as more commercial bank money becomes digital. I want Quant helping banks move between networks. I want Quant coordinating tokenized cash and tokenized securities. I want recurring licensing. I want more QNT locked. I want institutional Fusion activity. I want trusted nodes staking QNT. Those are the things that can turn institutional adoption into sustainable token demand. And if Quant gets there, I think the upside could be much larger than people expect today. The Clearing House already moves trillions. Britain already has live tokenized-deposit transactions. The banks are already building programmable money. Quant is already inside the infrastructure. Now I’m watching how much of that institutional growth eventually reaches $QNT itself. That’s the part that could make the next QNT cycle very different from the last one.
1:00

Most people look at $QNT and ask, “How high can the price go?” I start with a completely different question: what happens if banks in different countries start issuing tokenized money on different systems and all of those systems need to talk to each other? Warning: this one is LONG. Probably one of my deepest $QNT posts yet. Give me a few minutes and read the whole thing. It’ll be worth it. That question led me straight back to The Clearing House. And once you understand the architecture The Clearing House is building, the entire Quant thesis starts making a lot more sense. The Clearing House is one of the most important pieces of U.S. banking infrastructure. It is owned by 25 banks. Its CHIPS network has 43 direct participants. CHIPS settles more than $2T in average value each business day. During 2025 it processed around $2.014T in average daily payments. Its liquidity efficiency was around 26:1. So when I talk about The Clearing House moving toward tokenized deposits, understand the scale. This is not a crypto company trying to get banks interested. These are banking rails banks already use. Now they are preparing those rails for tokenized commercial bank money. On August 24, 2026, The Clearing House published a discussion with Chief Strategy Officer Sal Karakaplan. The message was simple but extremely important. Banks using CHIPS and RTP already have their settlement infrastructure. They already maintain funds. They already have liquidity processes. They already have payment connectivity. So tokenized deposits should not force them to rebuild everything. Instead, tokenized transactions can be tightly connected with the systems they already use. That one idea is massive. Because the biggest obstacle to institutional blockchain adoption has always been disruption. Banks do not want to throw away working infrastructure. They want new capability without destroying the old system. Now fast-forward one month. September 24, 2026. The Clearing House selects Quant. Quant becomes the announced technology provider for: Interoperability. Orchestration. Transaction management. Quant also brings Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service. So imagine the future banking system. Bank A issues tokenized dollars on one ledger. Bank B uses another private network. Bank C wants programmable deposits but has not built its own blockchain system. A tokenized-securities platform needs cash settlement. A treasury platform needs programmable payments. A public blockchain contains tokenized assets. CHIPS remains the regulated high-value dollar settlement network. RTP handles real-time payments. These systems are different. But the money still needs to move between them. Quant’s job is to coordinate that complexity. I think this is much bigger than “blockchain interoperability.” This is financial-system interoperability. And the banks around The Clearing House initiative show how serious it is. JPMorgan Chase. Citi. Bank of America. HSBC. BNY. Wells Fargo. Santander. TD Bank. Then: BMO. Citizens. Fifth Third. Huntington. KeyBank. PNC. Regions. Truist. The comments from these institutions focused on exactly the problems Quant wants to solve. Tokenized-deposit clearing. Interbank connectivity. Trusted financial infrastructure. Interoperability. Programmable payments. Connecting blockchain capability with existing payment rails. The Clearing House subsequently chose Quant. That gives Quant a completely different distribution opportunity. Instead of selling software one bank at a time, Quant is now inside an initiative connected to an institution already serving major banks. That can shorten the path to institutional adoption dramatically. Then look at what Quant has already done in Britain. The Great British Tokenised Deposit initiative gives us a preview. Quant was selected in September 2025. One year later, seven banks had completed live customer transactions. The names: Barclays HSBC UK Lloyds Banking Group Monzo Nationwide NatWest Santander These transactions involved real money. Mortgage completions. A marketplace purchase. Funds could be reserved and released when conditions were met. This is programmable commercial bank money doing actual work. Now compare the timeline. UK Quant selection: September 2025. UK live customer transactions: September 2026. U.S. Quant selection by The Clearing House: September 2026. U.S. network targeted for availability: H1 2027. I see a pattern. Quant builds. Banks test. Transactions go live. Then the model expands to another market. Now layer international interoperability on top. In October 2026, Quant participated directly in the UK Finance Tokenised Markets and Money Conference. The discussion involved how tokenized-deposit initiatives from countries including the UK, Japan, the U.S. and Germany could connect. The industry is talking about: Standards. Rulebooks. Overlapping bank participation. Commercial corridors. Synchronized settlement. Payment-versus-payment. That is the future Quant has been preparing for. People sometimes think tokenization will simplify finance because everything moves onto one blockchain. I think the opposite can happen. Tokenization can create even more systems. Every major bank may have its own approach. Countries may build national frameworks. Central banks may support separate settlement infrastructure. Private asset ledgers will exist. Public blockchains will exist. Commercial bank deposit tokens will exist. Stablecoins will exist. Digital securities will exist. The technology becomes more diverse. The need for coordination becomes bigger. That is where a “network of networks” becomes valuable. Think about U.S.-UK payments. The U.S. bank has tokenized dollars. The UK bank has tokenized sterling. Both have domestic rules. Both have their own settlement rails. Both need foreign exchange. Both need confirmation. Both need compliance. Both need the cash and asset legs synchronized. Quant already has technology connected to both banking environments. I think that gives it an incredibly interesting strategic position. And I am not stopping at deposits. Look at Murex. Murex runs MX.3, widely used in institutional trading, risk management and post-trade operations. In March 2026, Murex and Quant announced an integration. Quant’s programmable money infrastructure can work alongside MX.3. Now banks can potentially handle tokenized deposits and digital bonds without changing the core institutional workflow they already use. This matters because tokenized assets need money. A digital bond cannot settle itself. A tokenized fund still needs subscriptions and redemptions. Tokenized collateral still needs financing. Tokenized securities still need delivery-versus-payment. If the asset moves but the cash cannot move with it, the system is incomplete. Quant is working across both sides. Asset systems. Money systems. Institutional software. Interoperability. That creates more commercial opportunities. Now I want to talk about token utility because this is where a lot of crypto research gets lazy. The Clearing House settling $2T does not mean $2T buys QNT. I care about a different mechanism. QNT is documented as an access and licensing token. Overledger subscribers can pay platform fees in USD or QNT. Historical licensing models used QNT for annual mainnet licensing. The 2026 MiCA disclosure also describes QNT utilization and locking in licensing arrangements. So institutional growth can potentially create token demand through access rather than through the gross dollar value of payments. That model makes more sense to me. If one bank moves $100B using Quant infrastructure, QNT does not need to absorb $100B. Quant needs commercial contracts. Licensing. Platform access. Network services. Potential token commitments. If the number of institutions keeps increasing, those commitments can compound. I care even more about locking. One-time purchases can come back to market. Locked tokens cannot. If enterprise arrangements require QNT to remain committed for periods of time, liquid supply can tighten. Then incoming demand has fewer freely available tokens to compete for. And QNT supply is already small. Roughly 14.56M circulating. Around 14.61M total supply in the data used for this research. That scarcity matters. Then add Fusion. Fusion launched on mainnet in June 2026. It initially connected 74 networks. Its Trusted Node Program gives institutions more control around who processes transactions. QNT has a documented staking role. So now I can see a second demand channel. Overledger and enterprise licensing create one path. Fusion execution and staking create another. If both scale together, QNT becomes much more interesting. Think of the potential progression. Bank joins Quant infrastructure. Bank or service provider needs platform access. Access creates licensing economics. Some licensing arrangements involve QNT usage or locking. Meanwhile, institutional networks connect through Fusion. Trusted nodes stake QNT. Network execution grows. More QNT becomes tied to productive use. Supply stays around 14.6M. That is the flywheel I want. We are not fully there yet. The exact QNT economics attached to The Clearing House contract have not been publicly disclosed. But the general utility already exists. That makes public confirmation of recurring institutional QNT demand one of the biggest catalysts I am waiting for. Now do the valuation math. Using about 14.61M tokens: $5B valuation = ~$342 QNT $10B = ~$684 $20B = ~$1,369 $30B = ~$2,053 $50B = ~$3,422 Again, these are valuation scenarios. They are useful because they show what QNT’s scarcity does when the market cap expands. The question becomes: What valuation would investors assign to a token if Quant becomes recurring infrastructure for bank-issued digital money? I think $10B becomes much easier to discuss if we see meaningful commercial bank onboarding, recurring QNT-linked revenue, rising activity and token commitments. Higher scenarios need even more. International usage. Multiple national banking systems. Cross-border network connectivity. Large-scale Fusion adoption. Material staking. Recurring institutional contracts. That is what I want to watch. And the catalysts are already lined up. 1. The Clearing House network opening in H1 2027. The partnership moves closer to real commercial usage. 2. U.S. bank onboarding. More institutions can mean more Quant products being used. 3. Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service. Banks that do not want to build token infrastructure themselves can still participate. 4. QNT-linked enterprise licensing. This is where institutional adoption can begin translating more directly into token demand. 5. Great British Tokenised Deposit expansion. The UK already has live transactions. More banks and more use cases would strengthen the proof. 6. U.S.-UK interoperability. Both national banking environments already have Quant technology involved. 7. Fusion trusted-node adoption. More nodes can mean more staking. 8. Fusion transaction growth. More execution can increase ongoing QNT utility. 9. Murex MX.3 integration. Tokenized bonds and institutional settlement open another market. 10. Delivery-versus-payment. Tokenized cash and tokenized securities can move together. 11. Corporate treasury automation. Conditional payments and programmable liquidity become real business use cases. 12. International network-of-networks development. This is the monster opportunity. Multiple national financial systems using Quant to coordinate transactions. Now zoom out globally. Britain already has live tokenized-deposit customer transactions. The United States has The Clearing House preparing its initiative with Quant. Europe has launched the first phase of Pontes for wholesale tokenized-asset settlement using central bank money. And international banking discussions are focusing on cross-border connectivity. Pontes is not currently an announced Quant project. I am not claiming it is. But Europe moving in the same broad direction matters. Because every new financial network increases the need for interoperability. The future is not going to be one giant blockchain. It will probably look more like the internet. Different networks. Different systems. Different protocols. Different organizations. Still able to communicate. Quant wants to become part of the layer making that possible for financial institutions. And the thing I like most is that Quant is approaching banks without asking them to abandon what already works. That is a huge advantage. Banks already have CHIPS. They already have RTP. They already have Murex. They already have internal ledgers. They already have compliance systems. Quant can sit between those systems. That is a much easier institutional pitch than saying: “Throw away your current infrastructure and put everything on our chain.” This is why I think Quant has a chance to scale differently from many crypto networks. It is not competing to be the one ledger every bank uses. It is monetizing the fact that banks will use many ledgers. More fragmentation can actually increase the value of Quant. Think about that. If JPMorgan has one system. Citi has another. HSBC has another. A public blockchain hosts an asset. A central bank runs the final settlement layer. Murex manages trading. The Clearing House manages interbank payment infrastructure. Every connection between those pieces becomes an interoperability problem. Quant sells the solution to that problem. That is the business. Now think about $QNT. If those commercial connections increasingly require QNT for access, licensing, locking, execution or staking, the token begins reflecting that business growth. That is the bridge between the technology thesis and the investment thesis. And because QNT supply is small, the potential asymmetry is what keeps me interested. A lot of people saw QNT at $60. Then $100. Then $200. Then over $300. They only started asking questions after price moved. I prefer studying the infrastructure before the crowd starts chasing the chart. Right now I’m watching the next phase. Can The Clearing House deliver the H1 2027 network? How many banks participate? How much transaction activity appears? Does TDaaS expand the customer base? Does the UK system grow? Does cross-border interoperability become commercial? Does Murex bring Quant deeper into digital bonds and securities? Does Fusion gain institutional trusted nodes? Does QNT staking grow? Do enterprise licenses create recurring QNT demand? Those are the questions that matter. And if several of those answers become “yes,” the QNT story gets much bigger. I see Quant’s future in three steps. First: Become infrastructure banks trust. The UK and U.S. partnerships are doing that. Second: Become infrastructure banks repeatedly use. Commercial tokenized deposits, settlement, securities and treasury activity can do that. Third: Convert that usage into measurable QNT economics. Licensing. Locking. Execution. Staking. That final step is where I think the market could dramatically reprice QNT. I am bullish today because stage one is no longer imaginary. Quant has already delivered the UK banking infrastructure. The Clearing House already selected Quant. Murex already partnered with Quant. Fusion is already live. QNT utility is already documented. The banking industry is already talking about a network of networks. Everything does not need to happen tomorrow. I am looking years ahead. I want Quant sitting in the middle as more commercial bank money becomes digital. I want Quant helping banks move between networks. I want Quant coordinating tokenized cash and tokenized securities. I want recurring licensing. I want more QNT locked. I want institutional Fusion activity. I want trusted nodes staking QNT. Those are the things that can turn institutional adoption into sustainable token demand. And if Quant gets there, I think the upside could be much larger than people expect today. The Clearing House already moves trillions. Britain already has live tokenized-deposit transactions. The banks are already building programmable money. Quant is already inside the infrastructure. Now I’m watching how much of that institutional growth eventually reaches $QNT itself. That’s the part that could make the next QNT cycle very different from the last one.

X Finance Bull

48,554 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

5 Quant explainers. 1 map. 🗺️ Overledger, Fusion, PayScript, Quant Flow, SATP: I covered each one alone. This video puts them together, layer by layer, plus the 3 places $QNT shows up. 10 min, straight from the docs 🧵👇 Which layer do you know least about?
1:16

5 Quant explainers. 1 map. 🗺️ Overledger, Fusion, PayScript, Quant Flow, SATP: I covered each one alone. This video puts them together, layer by layer, plus the 3 places $QNT shows up. 10 min, straight from the docs 🧵👇 Which layer do you know least about?

juanjoarl ττ

70,251 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

🇪🇺BREAKING: ECB launches “Digital Euro” for banks as Pontes begins tokenized finance pilot. President of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde announces The ECB is launching Pontes today, a platform that will connect private blockchain networks with the TARGET system, allowing banks to settle tokenized assets directly in central bank money. “It's digital euro made available for banks,” the ECB says, allowing institutions to transact using tokenized assets and DLT “faster, without friction," she adds. Pontes is the first step toward the ECB’s broader Appia ecosystem for tokenized financial markets, while consumer-facing digital euro testing is planned for mid-2027.
2:23

🇪🇺BREAKING: ECB launches “Digital Euro” for banks as Pontes begins tokenized finance pilot. President of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde announces The ECB is launching Pontes today, a platform that will connect private blockchain networks with the TARGET system, allowing banks to settle tokenized assets directly in central bank money. “It's digital euro made available for banks,” the ECB says, allowing institutions to transact using tokenized assets and DLT “faster, without friction," she adds. Pontes is the first step toward the ECB’s broader Appia ecosystem for tokenized financial markets, while consumer-facing digital euro testing is planned for mid-2027.

Coin Bureau

1,003,524 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

QUANT NETWORK OVERLEDGER $QNT
2:04

QUANT NETWORK OVERLEDGER $QNT

⚡️CTR@DERZ⚡️

24,804 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🏦Tokenized Deposits are officially LIVE in UK Japan/EU/US all building to that same vision now This video shows Quant $QNT makes UK GBTD possible as the INFRASTRUCTURE layer👇
1:18

🏦Tokenized Deposits are officially LIVE in UK Japan/EU/US all building to that same vision now This video shows Quant $QNT makes UK GBTD possible as the INFRASTRUCTURE layer👇

🥖Tokenicer✲⥃⬢

12,568 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Quant Network has been quietly cooking this year. Here are some updates that demonstrate Quant's progress in 2026... (1) $QNT announced a strategic partnership with Murex in March, a global leader in capital markets trading. This integration embeds tokenized deposits and digital corporate bonds directly into the native workflows of top-tier institutional banks. (2) Led by UK Finance and involving banking heavyweights like HSBC, Barclays, and Lloyds, the Great British Tokenized Deposit project is reaching its scheduled completion in mid-2026. This project successfully utilizes Quant’s Overledger as its core interoperability layer. (3) More and more $QNT is being locked up. Because Overledger's enterprise licensing model requires institutions to purchase licenses paid in QNT and lock them up for up to 12 months, the influx of commercial adoption from the GBTD and Murex rollouts has taken a significant portion of QNT's 14.9 million token supply off the liquid market. Are you still optimistic about Quant Network?
0:20

Quant Network has been quietly cooking this year. Here are some updates that demonstrate Quant's progress in 2026... (1) $QNT announced a strategic partnership with Murex in March, a global leader in capital markets trading. This integration embeds tokenized deposits and digital corporate bonds directly into the native workflows of top-tier institutional banks. (2) Led by UK Finance and involving banking heavyweights like HSBC, Barclays, and Lloyds, the Great British Tokenized Deposit project is reaching its scheduled completion in mid-2026. This project successfully utilizes Quant’s Overledger as its core interoperability layer. (3) More and more $QNT is being locked up. Because Overledger's enterprise licensing model requires institutions to purchase licenses paid in QNT and lock them up for up to 12 months, the influx of commercial adoption from the GBTD and Murex rollouts has taken a significant portion of QNT's 14.9 million token supply off the liquid market. Are you still optimistic about Quant Network?

BSCN

22,225 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

MAJOR BANKS Are All in on Crypto & Stablecoins! Santhosh Srinivasan, VP of Treasury at Nium, highlights that banks are now proactively asking about utilizing stablecoins and digital assets, unlike a few years ago. Watch the full interview #crypto #stablecoins #banks
1:05

MAJOR BANKS Are All in on Crypto & Stablecoins! Santhosh Srinivasan, VP of Treasury at Nium, highlights that banks are now proactively asking about utilizing stablecoins and digital assets, unlike a few years ago. Watch the full interview #crypto #stablecoins #banks

Tony Edward (Thinking Crypto Podcast)

17,688 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Gilbert Verdian, Founder and CEO of Quant confirms the banks are DONE testing 🔥👀 They are 100% completely restructuring the financial system we are headed into a NEW ERA OF FINANCE and Quant has been at the forefront $QNT
1:28

Gilbert Verdian, Founder and CEO of Quant confirms the banks are DONE testing 🔥👀 They are 100% completely restructuring the financial system we are headed into a NEW ERA OF FINANCE and Quant has been at the forefront $QNT

Cypress Demanincor

32,584 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Quant's price jump is not pricing people out because its marketcap is still incredibly low with less supply than Bitcoin. If Quant achieves its potential as the interoperability layer for the 4th industrial revolution, it could easily reach $500k-$1M. #Quant $QNT
2:12

Quant's price jump is not pricing people out because its marketcap is still incredibly low with less supply than Bitcoin. If Quant achieves its potential as the interoperability layer for the 4th industrial revolution, it could easily reach $500k-$1M. #Quant $QNT

Apex Crypto Insights (NFA)

46,641 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨QNT TO $68,400!!! (266X QUANT QNT!)🚨 Quant QNT could potentially 266X to $68,400 per coin and reach a $1 TRILLION market cap, as some of the largest financial institutions in the U.S., U.K., Europe, and around the world are now adopting Quant QNT!👁🔥 If institutional adoption keeps accelerating, could $QNT really reach $68,400?! 🚀 #QNT #Quant #Bitcoin #Altcoin #Crypto
7:59

🚨QNT TO $68,400!!! (266X QUANT QNT!)🚨 Quant QNT could potentially 266X to $68,400 per coin and reach a $1 TRILLION market cap, as some of the largest financial institutions in the U.S., U.K., Europe, and around the world are now adopting Quant QNT!👁🔥 If institutional adoption keeps accelerating, could $QNT really reach $68,400?! 🚀 #QNT #Quant #Bitcoin #Altcoin #Crypto

Crypto X AiMan

34,474 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen