Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

instead of generating text, jev from TypeSafe AI generates structured output this makes it great for classification tasks like model routing, tool selection/search, and guardrails of many forms! it's also ridiculously fast and cheap compared to LLMs doing the same tasks

Sydney Runkle

14,955 subscribers

52,876 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Jev by TypeSafe AI is now on OpenRouter, in beta. Jev is a System One model. Instead of generating text, it takes your app's state plus a typed question and returns a typed decision with a probability attached. There is no JSON prompting, parsing layer, and nothing to validate against.

Jev by TypeSafe AI is now on OpenRouter, in beta. Jev is a System One model. Instead of generating text, it takes your app's state plus a typed question and returns a typed decision with a probability attached. There is no JSON prompting, parsing layer, and nothing to validate against.

OpenRouter

568,781 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Introducing Inversion, our family of structured LLMs. Our first generation models excel in structured tasks, offering unmatched speed, latency, reliability, and efficiency, with the most comprehensive typed JSON output support available anywhere.

Introducing Inversion, our family of structured LLMs. Our first generation models excel in structured tasks, offering unmatched speed, latency, reliability, and efficiency, with the most comprehensive typed JSON output support available anywhere.

John

213,103 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Robotics keeps hitting the same wall. Single task RL works, but... it does not scale to hundreds of tasks or new embodiments. This new paper looks like a real step toward fixing that. The team introduces MMBench, a benchmark with 200 tasks across many domains and robots, and Newt, a language conditioned world model trained online across all 200 tasks at once. The simple idea behind Newt: The model learns from demos to get the right priors It trains across many tasks through online interaction It uses language to ground the goal It adapts fast when a new task shows up What stood out to me: ✅ One model trained on 200 tasks at the same time ✅ Language conditioned control for both states and RGB ✅ Better data efficiency than strong baselines ✅ Strong open loop control ✅ Fast adaptation to new tasks and embodiments ✅ Full release of 200 checkpoints, 4000 demos, code, and benchmark This is a good push toward general control instead of one model per task. If you want the full paper: Project page: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Robotics keeps hitting the same wall. Single task RL works, but... it does not scale to hundreds of tasks or new embodiments. This new paper looks like a real step toward fixing that. The team introduces MMBench, a benchmark with 200 tasks across many domains and robots, and Newt, a language conditioned world model trained online across all 200 tasks at once. The simple idea behind Newt: The model learns from demos to get the right priors It trains across many tasks through online interaction It uses language to ground the goal It adapts fast when a new task shows up What stood out to me: ✅ One model trained on 200 tasks at the same time ✅ Language conditioned control for both states and RGB ✅ Better data efficiency than strong baselines ✅ Strong open loop control ✅ Fast adaptation to new tasks and embodiments ✅ Full release of 200 checkpoints, 4000 demos, code, and benchmark This is a good push toward general control instead of one model per task. If you want the full paper: Project page: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

70,090 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Alright TypeSafe AI cooked Jev is truly the next era of building w LLMs Added this to Scappa tonight

Alright TypeSafe AI cooked Jev is truly the next era of building w LLMs Added this to Scappa tonight

Pontus Karlsson

27,630 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Introducing Microsoft-Decision-1, our new model for fast decision-making. It delivers top performance on structured decision tasks, outperforming both LLMs and other decision models in latency and quality. We’re already testing it across Microsoft for everything from incident response and quality control to scientific discovery.

Introducing Microsoft-Decision-1, our new model for fast decision-making. It delivers top performance on structured decision tasks, outperforming both LLMs and other decision models in latency and quality. We’re already testing it across Microsoft for everything from incident response and quality control to scientific discovery.

Satya Nadella

1,710,968 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jev + SERV is actually insane. We already showed you can increase Jev's performance with SERV Reasoning. Now we're taking it further, bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with the upcoming SERV v3. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Jev is a decision-making model. Given a task and a set of options, it predicts which path is more likely. Think of the octopus that predicted World Cup results. Jev does that for your business, except it's not luck. It weighs every option and tells you how sure it is. It does this by assigning probabilities to outcomes. It doesn't generate text on its own, so you can't expect it to create a new outcome for you. But that's also what enables it to be lightning fast and dirt cheap. For example, in customer service you can ask Jev how to triage an incoming query and route it to the correct department. It can only select from the list of departments you provide it. This also means it can't hallucinate a new outcome outside the options it's given, which makes it incredibly interesting for OpenServ. In Graph Sharding, we take a single system prompt and break it down into multiple LLM steps with deterministic input and output shapes. Some of these steps require an LLM to produce new output, while others are simply decision routers that determine the next possible path. Traditionally, LLMs are slow and expensive. Breaking a single prompt into multiple steps increases accuracy and reliability by a ton, but it also introduces latency. Jev takes on those decision nodes, which are the backbone of a business process and therefore SERV graphs, and makes them super consistent and lightning fast, lowering the overall cost and latency of graph execution. SERV Reasoning on its own is a great force multiplier for Jev because, like all other models, it works by interpreting input instructions. The clearer those instructions are, the better the model performs. That's where SERV Reasoning comes into play. Just like amplifying any other model, we also amplify the accuracy and consistency of Jev's responses. And now we're bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with SERV v3.

Jev + SERV is actually insane. We already showed you can increase Jev's performance with SERV Reasoning. Now we're taking it further, bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with the upcoming SERV v3. Here's a breakdown of how it works: Jev is a decision-making model. Given a task and a set of options, it predicts which path is more likely. Think of the octopus that predicted World Cup results. Jev does that for your business, except it's not luck. It weighs every option and tells you how sure it is. It does this by assigning probabilities to outcomes. It doesn't generate text on its own, so you can't expect it to create a new outcome for you. But that's also what enables it to be lightning fast and dirt cheap. For example, in customer service you can ask Jev how to triage an incoming query and route it to the correct department. It can only select from the list of departments you provide it. This also means it can't hallucinate a new outcome outside the options it's given, which makes it incredibly interesting for OpenServ. In Graph Sharding, we take a single system prompt and break it down into multiple LLM steps with deterministic input and output shapes. Some of these steps require an LLM to produce new output, while others are simply decision routers that determine the next possible path. Traditionally, LLMs are slow and expensive. Breaking a single prompt into multiple steps increases accuracy and reliability by a ton, but it also introduces latency. Jev takes on those decision nodes, which are the backbone of a business process and therefore SERV graphs, and makes them super consistent and lightning fast, lowering the overall cost and latency of graph execution. SERV Reasoning on its own is a great force multiplier for Jev because, like all other models, it works by interpreting input instructions. The clearer those instructions are, the better the model performs. That's where SERV Reasoning comes into play. Just like amplifying any other model, we also amplify the accuracy and consistency of Jev's responses. And now we're bringing Jev-powered Decision nodes into Graph Sharding with SERV v3.

Armagan Amcalar

366,601 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Built a model router with Jev by TypeSafe AI. Jev decides what model fits your request best and the request is sent to that model.

Built a model router with Jev by TypeSafe AI. Jev decides what model fits your request best and the request is sent to that model.

Duncan

120,065 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BREAKING 🚨: OpenAI is actively polishing its Tasks feature and there is a big chance we will see them announced today 👀 - Tasks Beta will allow users to schedule tasks like "send me AI news from TestingCatalog at 9 am" - These automations will be handled by a new model tool "jawbone" - There will be a new Notifications tab in settings, assumingly to control the way you will receive notifications about scheduled tasks Interestingly, the same feature is being in development for Gemini. What is the chance of seeing both of them released on the same day?

BREAKING 🚨: OpenAI is actively polishing its Tasks feature and there is a big chance we will see them announced today 👀 - Tasks Beta will allow users to schedule tasks like "send me AI news from TestingCatalog at 9 am" - These automations will be handled by a new model tool "jawbone" - There will be a new Notifications tab in settings, assumingly to control the way you will receive notifications about scheduled tasks Interestingly, the same feature is being in development for Gemini. What is the chance of seeing both of them released on the same day?

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

204,165 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Jev vs GLM 5.3 at chess! Results: ◾ GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves ◾ Jev: ~0.3s and <$0.0001 per move ◾ GLM 5.3: ~5.8s and ~$0.008 per move ◾ The whole game cost 24 cents My main takeaway is that it's often useful to use each one to their strengths: ◾ Fast, well-defined classification → specialized models like Jev ◾ Classifications that need reasoning or lookahead → LLMs like GLM 5.3 ◾ Real classification pipelines → hybrid. Jev handles the easy calls, an open model handles the hard ones. The future is multi-model!

Jev vs GLM 5.3 at chess! Results: ◾ GLM 5.3 won by checkmate in 29 moves ◾ Jev: ~0.3s and <$0.0001 per move ◾ GLM 5.3: ~5.8s and ~$0.008 per move ◾ The whole game cost 24 cents My main takeaway is that it's often useful to use each one to their strengths: ◾ Fast, well-defined classification → specialized models like Jev ◾ Classifications that need reasoning or lookahead → LLMs like GLM 5.3 ◾ Real classification pipelines → hybrid. Jev handles the easy calls, an open model handles the hard ones. The future is multi-model!

Hassan

39,704 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

VLMs can be surprisingly accurate and token-efficient on the right tasks. In a bake-off between VLM-based document classification vs. OCR-based classification using our new TypeSafe AI-compatible SystemOne API, we're seeing over ~7x token-efficiency! VLM: 372 tokens/page, fixed. OCR->Text: 2,002 median, 19,159 on the worst page.

VLMs can be surprisingly accurate and token-efficient on the right tasks. In a bake-off between VLM-based document classification vs. OCR-based classification using our new TypeSafe AI-compatible SystemOne API, we're seeing over ~7x token-efficiency! VLM: 372 tokens/page, fixed. OCR->Text: 2,002 median, 19,159 on the worst page.

Sudeep Pillai

10,887 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Dynamic workflows are a generalization of harnesses, automations, loops, routing, and graphs. It's the most powerful feature I have built into my agent orchestrator. Supports all kinds of patterns that leverage different agent backends (claude, codex, pi, hermes,...). It's a meta-harness approach that unlocks new forms of test-time compute. Example of use cases it supports: > LLM councils to get different perspectives from LLMs or plan more intensively > Dynamically routing tasks to different agents based on needs (e.g., cost efficiency and optimal intelligence) > Advisor/Judge + executor workflows and pretty much any complex graph-based pattern required by the task. I find it especially useful for long-running work and code reviewing. > Agent teams that talk to each other if needed for the task. I like to use this for AI editing, artifact creation, and other creative tasks. And I am sure it supports so many things that I haven't discovered yet. I got inspired by the dynamic workflow feature released by the Claude Code team. I had actually built it earlier this year but wanted to generalize it across different agent backends. I think this is going to become more popular in the coming days. I will share more of my findings soon.

Dynamic workflows are a generalization of harnesses, automations, loops, routing, and graphs. It's the most powerful feature I have built into my agent orchestrator. Supports all kinds of patterns that leverage different agent backends (claude, codex, pi, hermes,...). It's a meta-harness approach that unlocks new forms of test-time compute. Example of use cases it supports: > LLM councils to get different perspectives from LLMs or plan more intensively > Dynamically routing tasks to different agents based on needs (e.g., cost efficiency and optimal intelligence) > Advisor/Judge + executor workflows and pretty much any complex graph-based pattern required by the task. I find it especially useful for long-running work and code reviewing. > Agent teams that talk to each other if needed for the task. I like to use this for AI editing, artifact creation, and other creative tasks. And I am sure it supports so many things that I haven't discovered yet. I got inspired by the dynamic workflow feature released by the Claude Code team. I had actually built it earlier this year but wanted to generalize it across different agent backends. I think this is going to become more popular in the coming days. I will share more of my findings soon.

elvis

32,897 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Introducing 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗝𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲, a framework for low latency structured output generation from LLMs. Generate JSON up to 𝟮𝟬𝘅 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 from OpenAI and open source models. ❌ No need to threaten the model, tip the AI, etc ❌ Built with Alex Derhacobian 🔧 🧵👇

Introducing 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗝𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲, a framework for low latency structured output generation from LLMs. Generate JSON up to 𝟮𝟬𝘅 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 from OpenAI and open source models. ❌ No need to threaten the model, tip the AI, etc ❌ Built with Alex Derhacobian 🔧 🧵👇

Varun Shenoy

166,291 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Boom! Grok Tasks Make It One Of The Most POWERFUL Real-Time AI Systems In The World. — My How to Use Grok Tasks With Hidden Tools For Powerful Daily Output. Grok Tasks are customizable AI workflows that integrate a variety of tools to streamline daily activities, from research and analysis to creative planning and problem-solving. I have been using them for quite sometime and because of the vital heartbeat of news and first person data on X, it is the most powerful AI platform available. By combining Tasks with tools like web searches, X platform interactions, code execution, and media viewers, you can build efficient, automated processes. These tasks work by prompting Grok with a clear description of what you want to achieve, and Grok will intelligently call the necessary tools in sequence or parallel to deliver results. Here's a step-by-step guide to creating and using Grok Tasks: Step 1: Define Your Task Start by clearly outlining the daily activity or goal. Consider what inputs you have (e.g., a URL, a query, or an attachment) and what output you need (e.g., a summary, calculation, or visual analysis). Break it down into subtasks to identify tool needs. For example, if your task involves researching current events, note that you'll need search and browsing capabilities. Step 2: Review Available Tools Familiarize yourself with the tools Grok can access. Here's a quick overview: - Code Execution: Run Python code for calculations, data processing, or simulations using libraries like numpy, pandas, or sympy. - Browse Page: Fetch and summarize content from any website URL with custom instructions. - Web Search: Perform general internet searches, returning results with optional operators like site:. - Web Search With Snippets: Get quick, detailed excerpts from search results for fact-checking. - X Keyword Search: Advanced search for X posts using operators like from:, since:, or filter:. - X Semantic Search: Find semantically related X posts based on a query, with filters for dates or users. - X User Search: Locate X users by name or handle. - X Thread Fetch: Retrieve a full X post thread, including context like replies and parents. - View Image: Analyze an image from a URL or conversation ID. - View X Video: Extract frames and subtitles from an X-hosted video. - Search PDF Attachment: Query a PDF file for relevant pages using keyword or regex modes. - Browse PDF Attachment: View specific pages of a PDF with text and screenshots. Select tools that align with your task. Aim for a mix to handle data gathering, processing, and visualization. Step 3: Craft Your Prompt Write a detailed prompt to Grok describing the task. Include: - The overall goal. - Specific steps or subtasks. - References to tools if you want to guide the process (e.g., "Use web_search to find sources, then code_execution to analyze data"). - Any constraints, like dates or limits. Example prompt: "Create a Grok Task for my morning routine: Search recent X posts about tech news using x_keyword_search, fetch a key thread with x_thread_fetch, and summarize with browse_page on linked articles." Step 4: Submit and Interact Send your prompt to Grok. It will process the task by calling tools as needed, often in parallel for efficiency. Review the output and refine with follow-up prompts if required (e.g., "Expand on that using view_image for visuals"). Iterate to fine-tune the workflow for reuse. Step 5: Save and Reuse Once refined, note the prompt as a template for future use. You can adapt it for similar tasks, making Grok Tasks a habitual part of your day. Finding Grok Tasks To discover existing Grok Tasks or inspiration for new ones, use X searches with tools like x_keyword_search or x_semantic_search (e.g., query: "Grok Tasks examples" with mode: Latest). Browse community-shared threads via x_thread_fetch, or web_search for tutorials on xAI features. Prompt Grok directly: "Show me popular Grok Tasks for productivity." 1 of 3

Boom! Grok Tasks Make It One Of The Most POWERFUL Real-Time AI Systems In The World. — My How to Use Grok Tasks With Hidden Tools For Powerful Daily Output. Grok Tasks are customizable AI workflows that integrate a variety of tools to streamline daily activities, from research and analysis to creative planning and problem-solving. I have been using them for quite sometime and because of the vital heartbeat of news and first person data on X, it is the most powerful AI platform available. By combining Tasks with tools like web searches, X platform interactions, code execution, and media viewers, you can build efficient, automated processes. These tasks work by prompting Grok with a clear description of what you want to achieve, and Grok will intelligently call the necessary tools in sequence or parallel to deliver results. Here's a step-by-step guide to creating and using Grok Tasks: Step 1: Define Your Task Start by clearly outlining the daily activity or goal. Consider what inputs you have (e.g., a URL, a query, or an attachment) and what output you need (e.g., a summary, calculation, or visual analysis). Break it down into subtasks to identify tool needs. For example, if your task involves researching current events, note that you'll need search and browsing capabilities. Step 2: Review Available Tools Familiarize yourself with the tools Grok can access. Here's a quick overview: - Code Execution: Run Python code for calculations, data processing, or simulations using libraries like numpy, pandas, or sympy. - Browse Page: Fetch and summarize content from any website URL with custom instructions. - Web Search: Perform general internet searches, returning results with optional operators like site:. - Web Search With Snippets: Get quick, detailed excerpts from search results for fact-checking. - X Keyword Search: Advanced search for X posts using operators like from:, since:, or filter:. - X Semantic Search: Find semantically related X posts based on a query, with filters for dates or users. - X User Search: Locate X users by name or handle. - X Thread Fetch: Retrieve a full X post thread, including context like replies and parents. - View Image: Analyze an image from a URL or conversation ID. - View X Video: Extract frames and subtitles from an X-hosted video. - Search PDF Attachment: Query a PDF file for relevant pages using keyword or regex modes. - Browse PDF Attachment: View specific pages of a PDF with text and screenshots. Select tools that align with your task. Aim for a mix to handle data gathering, processing, and visualization. Step 3: Craft Your Prompt Write a detailed prompt to Grok describing the task. Include: - The overall goal. - Specific steps or subtasks. - References to tools if you want to guide the process (e.g., "Use web_search to find sources, then code_execution to analyze data"). - Any constraints, like dates or limits. Example prompt: "Create a Grok Task for my morning routine: Search recent X posts about tech news using x_keyword_search, fetch a key thread with x_thread_fetch, and summarize with browse_page on linked articles." Step 4: Submit and Interact Send your prompt to Grok. It will process the task by calling tools as needed, often in parallel for efficiency. Review the output and refine with follow-up prompts if required (e.g., "Expand on that using view_image for visuals"). Iterate to fine-tune the workflow for reuse. Step 5: Save and Reuse Once refined, note the prompt as a template for future use. You can adapt it for similar tasks, making Grok Tasks a habitual part of your day. Finding Grok Tasks To discover existing Grok Tasks or inspiration for new ones, use X searches with tools like x_keyword_search or x_semantic_search (e.g., query: "Grok Tasks examples" with mode: Latest). Browse community-shared threads via x_thread_fetch, or web_search for tutorials on xAI features. Prompt Grok directly: "Show me popular Grok Tasks for productivity." 1 of 3

Brian Roemmele

152,242 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Jev 🤝 CopilotKit We tested UI rendering side by side to demonstrate how Jev from TypeSafe AI can instantly stream components with GPT-6 Luna. Same prompt, renderer and sample data.

Jev 🤝 CopilotKit We tested UI rendering side by side to demonstrate how Jev from TypeSafe AI can instantly stream components with GPT-6 Luna. Same prompt, renderer and sample data.

CopilotKit🪁

21,708 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

AI NEWS: OpenAI just launched 'Tasks', allowing users to schedule actions and reminders within ChatGPT. Tasks can be one-time reminders or recurring actions (like a daily news rundown), with up to 10 active tasks able to be scheduled at a time. A new '4o with scheduled tasks' model will be available in the dropdown menu, and ChatGPT will also be able to suggest frequent tasks from a user's chat history. The beta feature is rolling out to Plus, Team, and Pro ChatGPT subscribers over the next few days. Is this the first (baby) step in ChatGPT's agentic era? 🤖

AI NEWS: OpenAI just launched 'Tasks', allowing users to schedule actions and reminders within ChatGPT. Tasks can be one-time reminders or recurring actions (like a daily news rundown), with up to 10 active tasks able to be scheduled at a time. A new '4o with scheduled tasks' model will be available in the dropdown menu, and ChatGPT will also be able to suggest frequent tasks from a user's chat history. The beta feature is rolling out to Plus, Team, and Pro ChatGPT subscribers over the next few days. Is this the first (baby) step in ChatGPT's agentic era? 🤖

Rowan Cheung

355,674 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sonnet 5.5 is here! In Claude Code, users get ~30% more tasks done compared to Sonnet 5. It's smarter, so it needs fewer tokens for the same work. Here it rakes a yard of leaves using tool calls. 24s faster than Sonnet 5, with 6K fewer tokens. It leaves her extra time to read :)

Sonnet 5.5 is here! In Claude Code, users get ~30% more tasks done compared to Sonnet 5. It's smarter, so it needs fewer tokens for the same work. Here it rakes a yard of leaves using tool calls. 24s faster than Sonnet 5, with 6K fewer tokens. It leaves her extra time to read :)

cat

48,727 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jev dropped and people immediately started doing stupid sh*t with it people gave this thing trading bots, browsers, Doom, drones, dinosaurs and tax forms and basically said: “you decide.” here’s what happened: > jev-trader Jev gets a new Monad block every ~300ms and decides whether to place a live limit order. no essay. just the decision. 1,911 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-ultrafast a browser agent where Jev decides every click. the text model only wakes up when something actually needs to be written. 16,758 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-doom-agent someone compiled actual Chocolate Doom to WebAssembly and let Jev make the tactical decisions every frame. yes. Doom. ▸ ⁠ > jev-t-rex-runner remember that stupid Chrome dinosaur? now Jev plays it. jump → duck → run → repeat ▸ ⁠ > typesafe-chess Jev went against a real chess search engine. two games. colors swapped. the search engine won both — and overruled Jev’s first instinct on roughly half the moves. ▸ ⁠ > jev-drone camera → Jev → drone. a simulated quadrotor has to clear five stations while Jev looks at the situation twice a second and decides what happens next. ▸ ⁠ > tax-doc-classifier then someone gave it IRS forms. 261 documents. 100% strict accuracy. roughly $0.001/page. ▸ ⁠ > killmyidea this one is evil lol tell it your startup idea. Jev looks at it from different angles and gives you: KILL / FIX / SHIP ▸ ⁠ > jev-curate throw huge Parquet / JSONL datasets at it. Jev judges 1,500+ rows/sec and keeps only the stuff that passes your rules. ▸ ⁠ > pg-jev and now it’s inside PostgreSQL. ask questions about your own tables in plain English → get the decision back. ▸ ⁠ and this is the weird part: none of these need Jev to write you a beautiful paragraph. they need it to look at a situation and pick: BUY / WAIT CLICK A / CLICK B JUMP / DUCK KILL / FIX / SHIP KEEP / DROP that’s basically the whole Jev idea. LLMs think and write. Jev decides. code does. full setup + my three-question Jev test below

Jev dropped and people immediately started doing stupid sh*t with it people gave this thing trading bots, browsers, Doom, drones, dinosaurs and tax forms and basically said: “you decide.” here’s what happened: > jev-trader Jev gets a new Monad block every ~300ms and decides whether to place a live limit order. no essay. just the decision. 1,911 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-ultrafast a browser agent where Jev decides every click. the text model only wakes up when something actually needs to be written. 16,758 stars ▸ ⁠ > jev-doom-agent someone compiled actual Chocolate Doom to WebAssembly and let Jev make the tactical decisions every frame. yes. Doom. ▸ ⁠ > jev-t-rex-runner remember that stupid Chrome dinosaur? now Jev plays it. jump → duck → run → repeat ▸ ⁠ > typesafe-chess Jev went against a real chess search engine. two games. colors swapped. the search engine won both — and overruled Jev’s first instinct on roughly half the moves. ▸ ⁠ > jev-drone camera → Jev → drone. a simulated quadrotor has to clear five stations while Jev looks at the situation twice a second and decides what happens next. ▸ ⁠ > tax-doc-classifier then someone gave it IRS forms. 261 documents. 100% strict accuracy. roughly $0.001/page. ▸ ⁠ > killmyidea this one is evil lol tell it your startup idea. Jev looks at it from different angles and gives you: KILL / FIX / SHIP ▸ ⁠ > jev-curate throw huge Parquet / JSONL datasets at it. Jev judges 1,500+ rows/sec and keeps only the stuff that passes your rules. ▸ ⁠ > pg-jev and now it’s inside PostgreSQL. ask questions about your own tables in plain English → get the decision back. ▸ ⁠ and this is the weird part: none of these need Jev to write you a beautiful paragraph. they need it to look at a situation and pick: BUY / WAIT CLICK A / CLICK B JUMP / DUCK KILL / FIX / SHIP KEEP / DROP that’s basically the whole Jev idea. LLMs think and write. Jev decides. code does. full setup + my three-question Jev test below

kiosa

67,916 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Jev + Kimi K3 for fraud detection! TLDR: Jev classified 100 emails in 1.42 seconds, then I routed the uncertain cases to Kimi K3. The full pipeline got 96/100 correct for only ~$0.07. Video is not sped up, check out the live run! Here was my process: I gave Jev 100 emails to classify (a mix of 50 legit & 50 fraudelent emails). It classified all of them in 1.42 seconds. An underrated feature about Jev is it will give you the confidence score for a classification, so I routed any prediction under 95% confidence to Kimi K3 to be fully sure. 31 emails fell below that threshold. After routing those to Kimi K3, the combined pipeline reached 96% accuracy. The full run took 16 seconds & ~$0.07 in inference costs: - $0.068 from Kimi K3 on Together AI - $0.003 (1/3 of a cent) from Jev on TypeSafe AI. I think this is a really interesting pattern: use a fast specialized model like Jev for the narrow task, then route the uncertain cases to a larger LLM. I feel like this kind of approach could be a game changer for use cases like fraud or anything realtime. You can use the speed & low cost of Jev while having a larger LLM as a fallback to ensure high accuracy.

Jev + Kimi K3 for fraud detection! TLDR: Jev classified 100 emails in 1.42 seconds, then I routed the uncertain cases to Kimi K3. The full pipeline got 96/100 correct for only ~$0.07. Video is not sped up, check out the live run! Here was my process: I gave Jev 100 emails to classify (a mix of 50 legit & 50 fraudelent emails). It classified all of them in 1.42 seconds. An underrated feature about Jev is it will give you the confidence score for a classification, so I routed any prediction under 95% confidence to Kimi K3 to be fully sure. 31 emails fell below that threshold. After routing those to Kimi K3, the combined pipeline reached 96% accuracy. The full run took 16 seconds & ~$0.07 in inference costs: - $0.068 from Kimi K3 on Together AI - $0.003 (1/3 of a cent) from Jev on TypeSafe AI. I think this is a really interesting pattern: use a fast specialized model like Jev for the narrow task, then route the uncertain cases to a larger LLM. I feel like this kind of approach could be a game changer for use cases like fraud or anything realtime. You can use the speed & low cost of Jev while having a larger LLM as a fallback to ensure high accuracy.

Hassan

61,281 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The NVIDIA AI team shipped Nemotron 3.5 Super VL today, and you can call it now on CoreWeave Serverless Inference. Send it text and images, build with supported reasoning, tool calling and structured outputs, and trace every call in CoreWeave Agent Lens. It's a multimodal mixture-of-experts model with 12B active parameters, served in NVFP4. Pricing per 1M tokens is $0.25 input, $1.50 output, and $0.05 cached input. Try it here:

The NVIDIA AI team shipped Nemotron 3.5 Super VL today, and you can call it now on CoreWeave Serverless Inference. Send it text and images, build with supported reasoning, tool calling and structured outputs, and trace every call in CoreWeave Agent Lens. It's a multimodal mixture-of-experts model with 12B active parameters, served in NVFP4. Pricing per 1M tokens is $0.25 input, $1.50 output, and $0.05 cached input. Try it here:

CoreWeave

11,082 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Pay close attention to agentic search. LLM agents get much better at specialized tasks when you give them structured, expert knowledge. Xerj Corpus Hub lets you do this for any agent with no retraining. You connect a ready-made corpus of docs, guidelines, or real source code, and the agent searches it while it works. It's free, open source, and runs locally.

Pay close attention to agentic search. LLM agents get much better at specialized tasks when you give them structured, expert knowledge. Xerj Corpus Hub lets you do this for any agent with no retraining. You connect a ready-made corpus of docs, guidelines, or real source code, and the agent searches it while it works. It's free, open source, and runs locally.

elvis

14,967 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce