Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Intel $INTL supposedly will make chips for Apple $AAPL This could make Intel a $200 stock… Also takes market share from $TSM

67,013 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

16 Kommentare

Profilbild von 0
0vor 6 Monaten

200 sounds crazy now, but wait till the momentum takes it higher than that. couple years we'll be looking at intel doing a nvda.

Profilbild von Mica Lesser
Mica Lesservor 6 Monaten

Ha - TSM doesn’t have the capacity for lower margin phone chips. Listen to clowns like this you will lose money

Profilbild von Ryan
Ryanvor 6 Monaten

Sounds like we are back on track for Ohio Foundry 👌… road to $200 let’s go!

Profilbild von Always Hungry
Always Hungryvor 6 Monaten

reshoring...INTL and MU. TSM should shift more of its production stateside for national security reason. There are national security implications

Profilbild von 乖離(*´∀`)🍑😊🐻😾☔🎵🍢🌸💯🗽🇯🇵🗻🏝️🌲🏡🆓🎮🚗🚴💨
乖離(*´∀`)🍑😊🐻😾☔🎵🍢🌸💯🗽🇯🇵🗻🏝️🌲🏡🆓🎮🚗🚴💨vor 6 Monaten

250ドルくらいはありそうな気がする。 工場で量産すると決まったら設計の工数(売り上げ)は発生すると思うけど。TERAFABも含めて。

Profilbild von dust
dustvor 6 Monaten

So intel are going to fab chips for Apple based off Arm architecture. Arm did enquire about purchasing intel fab operations. So I guess it happened in a roundabout way

Profilbild von Durr
Durrvor 6 Monaten

lowkey think $INTC has to at least double from here

Profilbild von KnowledgeDesk
KnowledgeDeskvor 6 Monaten

It's less than $1b in revenue at 25% discount to TSM. Margins will be nil. Trump twisted Cook's arm to get this deal done.

Profilbild von Roadstar 🎖️
Roadstar 🎖️vor 6 Monaten

you mean $INTC ?

Profilbild von El Profesor Garlic 🧄🤖⚡️🚘🔋📡🛰️🇺🇸🚀🟠
El Profesor Garlic 🧄🤖⚡️🚘🔋📡🛰️🇺🇸🚀🟠vor 6 Monaten

$INTC is in the midst of a pivotal turnaround, with its foundry business showing significant revenue growth but continuing to struggle with profitability due to high, yet improving, manufacturing costs and low yields 😿

Profilbild von Rice ₳ Eggs
Rice ₳ Eggsvor 6 Monaten

Owning both is no harm, or just buy smh to sleep better.

Profilbild von Gary Snow
Gary Snowvor 6 Monaten

Taiwan absolutely agrees with you

Profilbild von lvhl
lvhlvor 6 Monaten

intc

Profilbild von Sebation Thomas
Sebation Thomasvor 6 Monaten

Could?

Profilbild von Luís Coelho da Silva
Luís Coelho da Silvavor 6 Monaten

$AAPL has no choice because AI will absorb all $TSM capacity 🙏

Profilbild von toni
tonivor 6 Monaten

Apple making Intel chips could actually hurt Intel long-term. Apple controls the terms, margins stay thin, and Intel becomes a contract manufacturer - not a tech leader. TSM should worry less than Intel's own investors.

Ähnliche Videos

Intel just pulled off the greatest corporate comeback since Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997. 12 months ago, Intel was dying. Stock at $19. CEO fired. Market cap collapsing. Analysts writing obituaries. But on Friday, it had its BEST day since 1987. Stock hit $82. Surpassed its dot-com peak from the year 2000 that nobody thought would ever be touched again. Up 335% from its 52-week low. And the story of HOW this happened is absolutely genius: In December 2024, Intel's board forced out CEO Pat Gelsinger after a brutal tenure. The stock had cratered and market share was bleeding to AMD and Nvidia. The company that invented the modern microprocessor was dying. 3 months later, they hired Lip-Bu Tan. Former Cadence CEO and Intel board member. A guy who'd spent decades in the semiconductor trenches. His first year was ugly: In January 2026, Intel crashed 17% in a single day after Tan admitted they couldn't meet demand and yields were below targets. Worst day since August 2024. "Multiyear journey" became code for "this company might not make it." Then something shifted. Tan went back to Intel's roots: Killed the bureaucracy, cut the bloat, and focused entirely on engineering. "We need to be data driven, paranoid, and engineering driven." Paranoid. The same word Andy Grove used when he built Intel into a superpower in the 90s. And behind the scenes, Tan pulled off 3 moves that changed everything: Move 1: He got Elon Musk. Tesla announced that TERAFAB, the most ambitious chip factory ever proposed, would use Intel's next-generation 14A manufacturing process. Elon said he couldn't think of a better partner. This is the deal Intel's foundry business needed to survive. Tan had previously warned that if Intel couldn't attract outside manufacturing clients, the entire foundry division would be shut down. Move 2: He got Nvidia. Last September, Jensen Huang invested $5 billion directly into Intel. The CEO of Intel's biggest competitor put billions into the company everyone had left for dead. Intel stock jumped 23% that day alone. Move 3: He got the US government. And this is where the story gets really crazy... The CHIPS Act allocated billions to Intel for domestic chip manufacturing. But when Trump took office, his administration opposed the program's conditions - union requirements, buyback restrictions, and a $100 billion investment commitment from Intel. So instead of giving Intel the grants, Trump's team converted $8.9 billion in CHIPS Act funds into equity. Bought a 9.9% stake at $20.47 per share. They didn't want to give Intel free money, so they simply bought stock instead. After Friday's earnings beat, that stake is worth $36 billion. A $27 billion paper gain. One of the most profitable government investments in American HISTORY. And it was a complete accident. Trump tried to kill the CHIPS Act handout. Instead he accidentally created a return that would make most hedge funds jealous. The earnings that triggered all of this were truly insane: - Revenue of $13.6 billion vs $12.4 billion expected - EPS of $0.29 vs $0.01 expected - They beat by 29x on earnings - Data center and AI revenue up 22% - Demand for CPUs exceeded supply for the first time in years Tan's quote on the call: "A year ago the conversation around Intel was about whether we could survive. Today it's about how quickly we can add manufacturing capacity." 6 consecutive quarters beating guidance. 4th CEO in 7 years. And the one who finally cracked it did it by going back to the basics. No flashy pivots like other companies. Just chips, engineering, and paranoia.

Ricardo

67,437 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten