Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🧵Interesting how outrage suddenly appears when accountability knocks on certain doors When Chaskalson dismantled Mogotsi piece by piece, we applauded pursuit of truth. When Sello rigorously cross-examined Dr Mashazi & Julius Mkhwanazi, no one cried foul.

31,745 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Westerners keep asking: “Why are Chinese people so obsessed with every piece of their territory?” Let me answer this in a way they might finally understand. Because for China, land was never a trophy. It was never something you took when you were strong and gave up when you were tired. For thousands of years, our land was an inheritance. not from governments, but from ancestors. From farmers, from villages, from dynasties that rose, collapsed, and rebuilt themselves from ash. Every generation guarded the soil handed down by the last. Not because of nationalism, but because this is how a 5,000-year-old civilization stays alive. Meanwhile in the West, especially in settler states, land is just… negotiable. Stolen yesterday, abandoned tomorrow. I once heard an American say: “If California left, who cares? You can take it.” Of course he thinks that. His country is built on land taken by force, not land remembered through ancestors. You cannot lose what you never loved. China is different. We don’t guard territory because of politics. We guard it because we survived a century where others carved us apart, piece by piece, while calling it ‘civilization’ and ‘law’. We learned the lesson with blood: A nation that allows one inch to be taken, will eventually lose the right to stand. And here is the part Western moralists love to ignore: They cry for Palestine, claiming stolen land must be returned. But when China says Taiwan’s story is the same, suddenly “history doesn’t matter”. When Japan claims amnesia, they applaud. When China remembers, they panic. Why? Because a Japan that forgets is useful. A China that remembers is uncontrollable. And China today is—finally—at the stage where no one gets to tell us which parts of our history we are allowed to keep. This is not “aggression,” it is a civilization refusing to let its wounds be rewritten by former empires. So if you really want to understand why Taiwan is not negotiable, start here: For China, territory is memory. And memory is something we no longer allow others to steal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

547,989 views • 7 months ago

🚨 THIS IS HOW DEMOCRACIES ARE CAPTURED — NOT BY TANKS, BUT BY VOTES Katie Hopkins is not predicting a hypothetical future. She is describing a deliberate political mechanism already in motion. Not invasion by force — but power by demographic concentration. Pack populations into defined areas. Facilitate them with infrastructure. Channel funding through religious institutions. Replace individual civic choice with bloc obedience. At that point, elections cease to be contests of ideas and become transactions of organised voting power. This is not theory. It has happened across Europe. It is happening in parts of the United States right now. When voting shifts from personal conscience to religious instruction, democracy is no longer secular. When politicians court clerics instead of citizens, accountability dies. When segregation is tolerated for electoral gain, the nation fractures. These are not merely places of worship in this context — they function as centres of organisation, coordination, and political mobilisation. That is not accidental. That is structural. History shows that parallel societies do not announce themselves. They consolidate quietly. They vote collectively. And once entrenched, they cannot be dismantled without severe social conflict. The question confronting the West is stark: Do we still believe in one law, one civic culture, and one democratic standard — or are we surrendering it deliberately for short-term political power? Because when democracy is undermined by design, it is not reclaimed peacefully. And the clock is no longer on our side. Katie Hopkins

Jim Ferguson

16,335 views • 7 months ago

Being a whistleblower and a top cop does not make one immune to error, irresponsible behaviour and critique. The EFF has always had this kind of relationship with Lt General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi and all functionaries of the state. That is what Mkhwanazi is, a functionary of the state who has chosen to speak out. A functionary of the state, a state which has been run through the political outcomes of the ANC, is not infallible. Ronnie Kasrils, Mbazima Shilowa and many ANC stalwarts, including Mkhwanazi himself have stated the reality that intelligence and law enforcement has been compromised by the process and outcomes of ANC conferences. What would make Mkhwanazi immune to this political reality? What is wrong about pointing that out? No one in this country must have a blank cheque and South Africans must never be blackmailed into silence by people who think law enforcement is like supporting Kaizer Chiefs through thick and thin. This is law enforcement of a country, and a functionary of that is making sweeping unsubstantiated statements about politicians when he does not like what they have to say about him, selectively. Never must we descend public discourse and our democracy into a fan club. Exhibit A of how Lt General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi has been irresponsible when society sought to peacefully protest against the state of load shedding and Phala Phala Corruption in 2023z Seemingly this correct criticism warranted non-stop nodding behind Julius Malema three years ago.

Sinawo Thambo

150,124 views • 4 months ago

🚨Allahu Akbar, New York City - The Surrender Is Complete Zohran Mamdani Takes Office. The Law Was Ignored. After all the hand-wringing, fake outrage, and cable-news theatrics - yes. He was sworn in on the Quran anyway. New York City didn’t suddenly fall. It was surrendered - slowly, deliberately, and with Republican permission. The government refused to enforce the law, draw clear lines, or protect the Constitution when it still mattered. Democrats installed him. Republicans watched. And remember: he is a foreign national, elevated by a system that ignored immigration law, naturalization law, and the constitutional safeguards meant to stop this. For years, the political class had no problem weaponizing the system against conservatives, jailing them over fabricated crimes, destroying livelihoods, blacklisting them from work, bankrupting families, and burying critics under endless investigations, all while claiming to “defend democracy.” But when enforcement actually mattered, when it involved a radical left-wing foreign national and the application of immigration law, material-support statutes, and constitutional limits - suddenly nothing could be done. We were told to wait. The law sat on the shelf. No denaturalization, no accountability, no resistance. This was allowed! New York City didn’t fall because of the Left alone. It fell because those who claimed to be the opposition refused to fight when it still mattered. Remember that the next time they ask for your vote.

Amy Mek

994,537 views • 6 months ago