Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 INTERVIEW: COL. MACGREGOR ON HOW A WAR WITH IRAN COULD LOOK LIKE Why didn’t Trump strike Iran last month? Was it Israeli unpreparedness, pressure from the Gulf, or his military advisors warning the U.S. isn’t ready for war? With a military buildup still underway in the region, a...

2,125,742 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: KURDISH FORCES REPORTEDLY LAUNCH GROUND OFFENSIVE INTO IRAN A U.S. official has told Fox News that thousands of Iraqi Kurdish fighters have launched a ground offensive into Iran, opening what could become a new front in the war. The development comes on day five of Operation Epic Fury, as U.S. and Israeli forces continue large-scale strikes across Iran. According to the latest figures being reported:• Over 2,000 Iranian targets have been hit • More than 20 Iranian naval vessels destroyed • 500+ ballistic missiles launched by Iran • Over 2,000 drones fired in retaliation Pentagon officials say Iran’s military capability is declining rapidly, with ballistic missile launches reportedly down around 88% since the start of the campaign. At sea, U.S. forces appear to be tightening the pressure. Reports say an American submarine torpedoed and sank one of Iran’s major naval vessels, a rare submarine attack against a warship not seen often since World War II. Meanwhile, U.S. military leadership says the campaign is expanding rather than slowing, with more aircraft and strike capabilities arriving in the region. The White House says the objective remains unchanged: eliminate Iran’s ability to threaten the United States and its allies with missiles, drones, and nuclear weapons. If Kurdish forces are indeed operating inside Iran, the conflict may now be shifting from pure air war to multi-front pressure on the ground.

Jim Ferguson

23,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 OPERATION “EPIC FURY” ESCALATES AS U.S. AND ALLIES POUND IRAN According to new reports circulating from U.S. political and media sources, the campaign against Iran — described as Operation Epic Fury — is intensifying dramatically. Officials claim the strikes have inflicted devastating damage on Iran’s military infrastructure.Reportedly destroyed or heavily degraded:• Iranian naval capability • Air force assets • Radar and early-warning detection systems • Missile launch infrastructure • Hundreds of fighters and regime personnel Sources also claim Israeli strikes hit a meeting in Tehran where remnants of the regime were attempting to select a new supreme leader, forcing the gathering to disperse after missile impacts nearby. At the same time, Iranian retaliation has reportedly shifted toward short-range missiles and inexpensive drones, launched sporadically toward U.S. allies across the region. Several incidents have been reported:• A drone strike near a U.S. consulate in Dubai • Damage to a CIA station at the U.S. embassy in Saudi Arabia • Continued attempts to launch missiles toward Israel and regional bases U.S. Central Command is reportedly targeting launch sites immediately after missiles are fired, destroying them within minutes. Another major development could soon widen the war further. Sources suggest Saudi Arabia is close to deploying its air force, potentially flying combat missions alongside Israeli aircraft — an unprecedented alignment that would signal a major geopolitical shift in the Middle East. Meanwhile Washington has warned that the next 24 hours could bring a major expansion of the air campaign, with officials indicating the scale and intensity of strikes are about to increase significantly. Missile launches from Iran have reportedly dropped from roughly 100 per day at the start of the conflict to around 20, suggesting the sustained bombardment is degrading Iran’s capabilities. At the same time, the U.S. Navy is preparing to escort oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to prevent Iran from disrupting global energy supplies. If the current trajectory continues, the conflict could enter a new phase — with regional powers joining the campaign and Iran’s remaining military infrastructure coming under increasingly intense pressure.

Jim Ferguson

159,244 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: HEATED DEBATE ON WHETHER THE U.S. SHOULD STRIKE IRAN Tensions are rising fast, military options are on the table, and the debate over deterrence versus escalation is reaching a boiling point. NYT Best Seller Joel Rosenberg argues Iran has spent decades funding armed proxy groups that kill Americans and U.S. allies, says diplomacy has failed, and supports a large but limited strike to punish the regime without triggering full-scale war. He frames military action as necessary to protect U.S. credibility, allies in the region, and to stop Iran’s missile capabilities from growing unchecked. Prof. Glenn Diesen rejects that outright, warning any strike would escalate the conflict, push Iran toward nuclear deterrence, and risk a regional war driven by security competition. Glenn accuses Washington of ignoring Iran’s security concerns, while Joel fires back that Glenn is excusing one of the world’s most brutal regimes. Enjoy this conversation with Glenn Diesen and Joel C. Rosenberg 01:15 - Should the U.S. attack Iran? Trump’s 3 options. 02:53 - Prediction: Trump will choose a “large but limited strike.” 03:41 - Regime change via air power alone: Practical military limitations vs political goals. 06:48 - Ethnic fragmentation risks of Iranian regime collapse. 07:31 - Iran would respond “all out” to any strike. 10:42 - Who started hostilities? 1953 coup vs embassy takeover. 12:35 - Failures of past U.S. interventions (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan). 15:49 - Does Iran need to be an enemy of the U.S.? 16:05 - Israel, Iran, the U.S., and targeting. 20:34 - Were Iraq/Afghanistan “successful”? Success vs moral cost. 23:05 - Is the U.S. the problem? 28:15 - Nuclear facilities strike vs diplomacy argument. 32:54 - Ballistic missiles vs nuclear weapons as the real threat. 38:21 - Is Israel a threat to Gulf Nations? 45:54 - Israeli Foreign Policy, Law, and its ties to Arabs and Iran. 57:48 - End-of-year predictions for Iran and regional escalation.

Mario Nawfal

1,798,098 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳If America Can’t Handle Iranian Missiles, It’s Not Ready for China In just the first 16 days of war against Iran, the United States expended nearly 40% of its THAAD interceptors. If America’s most advanced air defenses are struggling against Iran—a regional power with a fraction of China’s capabilities—there is no plausible scenario in which the US is ready for a showdown with Beijing. The Chinese Arsenal The People’s Liberation Army operates the world’s largest missile inventory, backed by a rapid-action doctrine designed to dismantle U.S. bases and infrastructure in the early stages of conflict. Unlike Iran’s Kheibar Shikan and Sejjil missiles, China’s DF-27 anti-ship ballistic missile and DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle offer advanced mid-air maneuverability and sustained hypersonic speeds. With an estimated range of 8,000 kilometers, the DF-27 places U.S. naval installations at Pearl Harbor and Everett, Washington within striking distance—allowing China to threaten American assets without deploying a single ship. Strategic Implications According to Dr. Andrew Erickson of the US Naval War College, China is the first nation to operationalize an armed ICBM. These capabilities could cripple U.S. operational effectiveness across East Asia and complicate the defense of American interests in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines in the event of armed conflict. Depleted Defenses Even as Patriot and THAAD struggle against less sophisticated Iranian missiles, Western analysts warn that a large-scale Chinese attack could overwhelm U.S. defenses by depleting interceptor inventories entirely. With THAAD replenishment not expected until April 2027, the fragility of current stockpiles is increasingly difficult to ignore. The Central Question If US air defenses are depleted in the Middle East after just over two weeks of fighting Iran, how will they withstand a Chinese arsenal that dwarfs Iran’s—particularly when the DF-27 can already reach American soil?

NewRulesGeopolitics

137,247 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 EX-CIA ANALYST ON VENEZUELA & IRAN Ex-CIA analyst Larry Johnson says the U.S. operation that captured Maduro was made possible by covert cooperation at the highest levels of Venezuelan security. According to Larry, a senior Venezuelan official, secretly working with U.S. intelligence for years, issued a stand-down order that allowed Delta Force to land, extract Maduro, and exit with precision and speed. What appeared to be a flawless special operation was, in his words, “staged.” And on Iran, Larry believes the current protests are instigated by U.S. and Israeli intelligence, and the likelihood of toppling the regime is slim. He believes the U.S. and Israel are planning new strikes against the country, and that the regime is more prepared than it was during the 12-day war, with more advanced weapons and better readiness. 03:21 - Initial reaction to Maduro’s capture and why it felt “staged” 06:08 - Questions around the helicopter incident and lack of U.S. casualties 09:26 - Why a stand-down order could happen without full coordination 12:18 - No real plan after capturing Maduro: lessons from Iraq 15:36 - U.S. goal in Venezuela: oil control and pushing out China, Russia, Iran 18:21 - Risk of escalation and the Vietnam-style trap for the U.S. 21:31 - Why “precision strikes” are a myth and air power has limits 23:05 - Why the operation succeeded: insiders, unlocked doors, and no defenses 26:16 - Misuse of the Monroe Doctrine and U.S. interference in Latin America 29:53 - Contradictions between multipolar reality and U.S. global actions 31:15 - Why threats backfire and push countries closer to BRICS 34:02 - Trump’s behavior as a symptom of declining U.S. hegemony 36:49 - Houthis, Red Sea reality, and limits of U.S. naval power 39:26 - Iran protests: intelligence operations versus real public anger 42:09 - MEK, Mossad, CIA, and manufacturing opposition narratives 47:04 - Iran preparing for war and turning to Russia and China 51:24 - Why Iran is stronger now despite war, sanctions, and protests 54:12 - Difference between Iran’s government and the Islamic Republic 56:44 - Why the U.S. cannot replicate the Maduro operation in Iran

Mario Nawfal

880,540 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes? Troops, tanks, warplanes, and even Delta Force have been moving into the region. Davis says Trump’s not bluffing. The goal? Not just a symbolic hit, but something much bigger: take out Iran’s leadership, crush their military, and maybe even end the regime altogether. Why risk all this? Daniel Davis Deep Dive says it's not about national security. It’s regime change. Just like Syria. Tear Iran apart, keep it weak, and walk away. The problem? That never ends well. 03:16 - Trump likely delayed Iran strike due to Netanyahu's request for more prep time 04:15 - U.S. may be preparing for a massive regional war, not just limited strikes 05:22 - If Iran sees war as existential, they may abandon self-restraint entirely 06:45 - U.S. bases in the region are less defended than Israel's Iron Dome system 07:58 - Iran likely won’t target Gulf cities—wants to avoid widening the war 09:48 - Could Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei be targeted in a decapitation strike? 11:12 - Iran now more prepared than during the 12-day war, no surprise possible 13:24 - Iran's missile production was moved underground and continues actively 15:21 - Delta Force capture mission like in Venezuela? Unlikely and dangerous 17:07 - Houthis and Hezbollah might rise if Iran inflicts serious damage on Israel 18:43 - Could an Iranian military success provoke an Israeli nuclear response? 20:54 - Civil war in Iran post-regime change could be worse than current regime 22:47 - Iran's ethnic diversity and separatist movements make regime change risky 24:30 - Israel may prefer chaos in Iran over a functioning successor regime 27:06 - As the world watches other crises, Ukraine quietly loses more ground 30:52 - Ukraine’s frontline collapse or grinding defeat both seem inevitable 33:45 - Europe is drifting from U.S. leadership, considering talks with Russia 36:17 - Trump might dare Europe over Greenland with a troop deployment bluff 38:09 - Trump’s behavior may be more irrational than strategic/cognitive decline? 40:03 - NATO’s future is crumbling, Europe IS preparing for post-U.S. security 43:31 - No real military or economic reason for U.S. to “take” Greenland 45:00 - Trump likely to escalate further: Iran war, Venezuela unrest, NATO collapse

Mario Nawfal

1,909,932 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten