正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "THE WEST HAS A WEAPON THAT COULD END THIS WAR IMMEDIATELY, BUT WON'T USE IT" General Ben Hodges argues the West is sitting on the leverage that could cripple Russia's war machine: cutting off oil and gas exports to China and India. But if NATO keeps hesitating,...

315,173 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."

Eva Karene Bartlett

23,102 次观看 • 4 个月前

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos attempted to trip up Secretary of State Marco Rubio by asking the same question about Venezuela three different times. “What is the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?” And three times, Rubio shut him down. RUBIO: “I explained to you what our goals are and how we’re going to use the leverage to make it happen.” “As far as our legal authority on the quarantine, simple. We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats, and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. Is a court not a legal authority?” STEPHANOPOULOS: “Is the United States running Venezuela right now?” RUBIO: “Well, I’ve explained once again, I’ll do it one more time.” “What we are running is the direction this is going to move moving forward, and that is we have leverage.” “This leverage we are using and we intend to use. We started using already. You can see where they are running out of storage capacity. In a few weeks, they’re going to have to start pumping oil, unless they make changes.” “That leverage that we have with the armada of boats that are currently positioned, allow us to seize any sanctioned boats coming into or out of Venezuela loaded with oil or on its way in to pick up oil.” “We can pick and choose which ones we go after. We have court orders for each one.” “That will continue to be in place until the people who have control over the levers of power in that country make changes that are not just in the interest of the people of Venezuela but are in the interest of the United States and the things that we care about.” “The legal authority is the court orders that we have.”

Overton

213,086 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨Prof. John Mearsheimer on the risk of a future FALSE FLAG attack and SERIOUS escalation in the Ukraine🇺🇦 proxy war: ‘The very interesting question is what does the end game look like here? I mean, I think you’re eventually going to get a frozen conflict. You’re not going to get a meaningful peace agreement because the demands on the two sides are so far apart. So at some point, I think you’ll get an armistice, something along the lines of what you got after the Korean War ended in 1953. But getting to that frozen conflict could be very tricky. You want to remember that if the Ukrainians lose, that will put the Europeans in a desperate situation. They’ll be desperate and they’ll be looking for some way to rescue the situation…they have convinced themselves that losing to the Russians would be catastrophic. You want to remember that this is not just a war between Ukraine and Russia🇷🇺, that NATO is almost fully committed to this war. Of course, we’ve not had NATO soldiers on the ground doing the fighting, or NATO pilots in the air, but NATO otherwise has been completely committed to helping Ukraine win this war. And we have fought this war for almost four years. And for NATO to lose to Russia will be a humiliating defeat. And the Europeans will be desperate to see if they can find a way to avoid that. And that’s why your point about false flag operation, all for the purposes of dragging the United States back into the fight in a more full-fledged way so that the United States can help pull the Europeans’ chestnuts out of the fire. The temptation to do that will be very great. And I think that we have to worry about the serious possibility of escalation once we head towards the endgame here.’ -Prof. John Mearsheimer on the season finale episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

101,388 次观看 • 7 个月前