正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "UKRAINE WILL FIGHT FOR ITS WEAPONS AND TERRITORY" dennis clark (Ukraine’s top military analyst): “The most important thing is for Ukraine to keep its weapons. Foreign fighter jets, European fighter jets agreements which were signed with Gripen and with the Swedish side, and with the French side...

250,969 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,721 次观看 • 9 个月前

Listen to Bernard-Henri Lévy—a philosopher who has not just witnessed the war firsthand but argues that Ukraine is actually Europe's most vital security asset. As BHL puts it, Kyiv has the continent's best army, full stop, with the high-intensity experience to prove it. This isn't just about winning; it’s about making Ukraine the ultimate guarantor of European safety. Let's hear why he thinks bringing Ukraine into NATO isn't a risk—it's the only smart move against putin’s global chaos. Bernard-Henri Lévy: “For me, the security guarantees are not really NATO. If Ukraine were to join NATO, it wouldn't be NATO guaranteeing Ukraine's security. I believe it would be Ukraine that would be a security guarantee for Europe.” Host: “You wrote an editorial about that.” Bernard-Henri Lévy: “Yes, an editorial, because I think it is the best army in Europe. It is the only one that knows how to fight, it is the only one capable of deploying a significant number of men, and it is the only one that knows how to use our own weapons. The Caesar cannons, the …. , which are probably already in the field for some, and other sophisticated weapons. The only ones who know how to operate them today are the Ukrainians. So I think...” Host: “French soldiers know how to do it too.” Bernard-Henri Lévy: “Well yes, they know how to do it, except they know how to do it in theory. Knowing how to do it as I have seen the Ukrainians do it... I saw a French Caesar cannon in operation in Pokrovsk, it’s in my latest film, "Dans notre guerre" (In Our War). Well, the Ukrainians, they know how to do it in the snow, they know how to do it under fire, they know how to do it with attackers 2 km away. It's not quite the same knowledge. So, what I mean is that those who lose the most from this compromise are perhaps precisely the European countries and the NATO countries, because, even though the Americans will never let Ukraine join NATO (for now with Donald Trump it is impossible), well, it’s a shame for us. There you have it. It’s a shame for France, it’s a shame for Poland, it’s a shame for the Baltic States, it’s a shame for the West. There, I'm telling you. Bernard-Henri Lévy: Secondly, regarding the security guarantees from the United States and Europe towards Ukraine... On that, I am, like the Ukrainians often are, extremely skeptical. Because they have had security guarantees, since the Budapest Memorandum, when they were told: "Be nice, we are going to consolidate the nuclear weapons, there is no reason to leave them in both Russia and Ukraine. We'll gather everything in Ukraine, but we will give you security guarantees." The result was, a few years later, the shooting on the Maidan: 105 or 106 young people massacred in plain sight, without Europe lifting a finger, by militiamen in Moscow's pay, and so on. So, the true security guarantee for Ukraine is its army, its president, its civilian population, the skill and the incredible intelligence and composure of this man. Honestly, I don't know how this man, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, I don't know how he holds up. I don't know how he endures these trials, these humiliations, this... the stupidity that he is sometimes confronted with. I... he is a... there is heroism and there is saintliness in Zelenskyy. There is saintliness.”

Yasmina

32,016 次观看 • 7 个月前