正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Introducing Claude Opus 4.6. Our smartest model got an upgrade. Opus 4.6 plans more carefully, sustains agentic tasks for longer, operates reliably in massive codebases, and catches its own mistakes. It’s also our first Opus-class model with 1M token context in beta.

Claude

1,712,594 subscribers

10,606,908 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is Claude Sonnet 4.6: our most capable Sonnet model yet. It’s a full upgrade across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, knowledge work, and design. It also features a 1M token context window in beta.

This is Claude Sonnet 4.6: our most capable Sonnet model yet. It’s a full upgrade across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, knowledge work, and design. It also features a 1M token context window in beta.

Claude

7,599,543 次观看 • 5 个月前

.Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.6 👇 ➡️ Excels in agentic coding ➡️ Performs well with hard tasks requiring planning and tool calling Try it out yourself in Visual Studio Code.

.Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.6 👇 ➡️ Excels in agentic coding ➡️ Performs well with hard tasks requiring planning and tool calling Try it out yourself in Visual Studio Code.

GitHub

200,259 次观看 • 6 个月前

Qwen 3.6 Plus Preview just dropped on OpenRouter for Free. > 1M token context. > $0 input. $0 output. Meanwhile: - Claude Opus 4.6 → $5 / $25 per 1M - GPT-5.4 → charges for 1M context Qwen just nuked the pricing model. Open source isn’t slowing down. It’s taking over.

Qwen 3.6 Plus Preview just dropped on OpenRouter for Free. > 1M token context. > $0 input. $0 output. Meanwhile: - Claude Opus 4.6 → $5 / $25 per 1M - GPT-5.4 → charges for 1M context Qwen just nuked the pricing model. Open source isn’t slowing down. It’s taking over.

WorldofAI

146,277 次观看 • 4 个月前

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.

Yesterday we found out Qwen3.5-27B (dense) beats both the 35B and 122B MoE variants at UI replication from screenshots. Today's question: what about Jackrong's Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-4.6-Reasoning-Distilled? A distilled 27B with Claude Opus 4.6 reasoning baked in. So I put all 3 in the ring: - Qwen3.5-27B - Qwen3.5-27B-Claude-Opus-Distilled - Claude Opus 4.6 Since the distilled model isn't multimodal, I gave all three the same detailed text prompts describing the UI components from yesterday's test.

stevibe

126,243 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude Code just got a massive upgrade. • Git worktree isolation for parallel agents • App preview inside the desktop app • GitHub PR monitoring + auto fixes • Opus 4.6 with huge context • Auto memory across sessions

Claude Code just got a massive upgrade. • Git worktree isolation for parallel agents • App preview inside the desktop app • GitHub PR monitoring + auto fixes • Opus 4.6 with huge context • Auto memory across sessions

Mervin Praison

46,156 次观看 • 5 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 is now live in BLACKBOX AI, the best long-context model available right now. Doom built in 8 minutes. From one prompt. Reply and get free BLACKBOX AI credits.

Claude Opus 4.6 is now live in BLACKBOX AI, the best long-context model available right now. Doom built in 8 minutes. From one prompt. Reply and get free BLACKBOX AI credits.

BLACKBOX AI

13,801 次观看 • 6 个月前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,877 次观看 • 4 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

59,604 次观看 • 6 个月前

Claude Opus 4.8 now powers every agent inside Higgsfield Supercomputer. It reasons deeper, plans longer, and grades its own output harder than any model we have run. The agents catch their own mistakes earlier, so the human in the loop drops even further.

Claude Opus 4.8 now powers every agent inside Higgsfield Supercomputer. It reasons deeper, plans longer, and grades its own output harder than any model we have run. The agents catch their own mistakes earlier, so the human in the loop drops even further.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

44,592 次观看 • 2 个月前

$Claude Sonnet 4.6 just landed in Bolt. The most agentic Sonnet yet: plans multi-step features, parallelizes work, executes without hand-holding. Opus-class skill at a fraction of the cost. 48h promo: With Sonnet 4.6 only, Pro users get their monthly limit as a bonus. Free users get 2x limits.$

Claude Sonnet 4.6 just landed in Bolt. The most agentic Sonnet yet: plans multi-step features, parallelizes work, executes without hand-holding. Opus-class skill at a fraction of the cost. 48h promo: With Sonnet 4.6 only, Pro users get their monthly limit as a bonus. Free users get 2x limits.

bolt.new

1,609,634 次观看 • 5 个月前

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:

Quinn Leng

131,551 次观看 • 5 个月前

Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.

Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.

Claude

64,392,365 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 was just released... And it's now the default model in the #1 full stack vibe coding platform. Vibecode uses the Claude Code harness, so expect to be blown away by the quality of the mobile apps and web apps that you create. In celebration of 1,000,000 total apps created on vibecode, we're giving away a free month of Opus 4.6 for those who reply to this post. Reply and we'll DM you credits 👇

Claude Opus 4.6 was just released... And it's now the default model in the #1 full stack vibe coding platform. Vibecode uses the Claude Code harness, so expect to be blown away by the quality of the mobile apps and web apps that you create. In celebration of 1,000,000 total apps created on vibecode, we're giving away a free month of Opus 4.6 for those who reply to this post. Reply and we'll DM you credits 👇

Chorus.com

412,386 次观看 • 6 个月前

🎙️ State of Agentic Coding with Armin Ronacher ⇌ and Ben returns In this episode: - OpenClaw🦞 as a coding assistant? - Cursor stuck in an IDE trap? - Worktrees vs folders, Opus 4.6 fast mode, new predictions & more!

🎙️ State of Agentic Coding with Armin Ronacher ⇌ and Ben returns In this episode: - OpenClaw🦞 as a coding assistant? - Cursor stuck in an IDE trap? - Worktrees vs folders, Opus 4.6 fast mode, new predictions & more!

Ben Vinegar

22,521 次观看 • 5 个月前

I tried Opus 4.6 Max in Cursor with a much more detailed prompt and the results are incredible Functional inventory, health, tools, recipes, and more The only downside is how expensive the model is and it also had to fix some bugs, but it's a pretty strong model overall

I tried Opus 4.6 Max in Cursor with a much more detailed prompt and the results are incredible Functional inventory, health, tools, recipes, and more The only downside is how expensive the model is and it also had to fix some bugs, but it's a pretty strong model overall

Angel 🌼

70,710 次观看 • 6 个月前

Clawdbot creator, Peter Steinberger says Opus is the best model overall, but Codex is his go-to for coding. He trusts Codex to handle big codebases with almost no mistakes. It’s more reliable and needs less handholding, which makes him faster. Claude Code can work too, but it requires more effort and tricks. For serious tasks, Codex feels like a dependable coworker.

Clawdbot creator, Peter Steinberger says Opus is the best model overall, but Codex is his go-to for coding. He trusts Codex to handle big codebases with almost no mistakes. It’s more reliable and needs less handholding, which makes him faster. Claude Code can work too, but it requires more effort and tricks. For serious tasks, Codex feels like a dependable coworker.

Wes Roth

230,226 次观看 • 6 个月前

Excited to launch OpenHack! 🚀 A fully open source agentic security scanner to hunt and verify security vulnerabilities. Upto 40x cheaper, it is on par with Claude Opus 4.6 on CVE-Bench for finding logic based vulnerabilities in web apps.

Excited to launch OpenHack! 🚀 A fully open source agentic security scanner to hunt and verify security vulnerabilities. Upto 40x cheaper, it is on par with Claude Opus 4.6 on CVE-Bench for finding logic based vulnerabilities in web apps.

Ananay

14,113 次观看 • 2 个月前

Anthropic Head of Product: "At Anthropic, 100% of our engineers have already switched to Fable 5. It's our most powerful model. Tasks that Opus 4.6 was doing in a night, Fable 5 does in an hour. Capabilities are incredible." in 40-minute session, Anthropic's Head of Product share the capabilities of Fable 5 and his workflow. Watch today, then read the article below.

Anthropic Head of Product: "At Anthropic, 100% of our engineers have already switched to Fable 5. It's our most powerful model. Tasks that Opus 4.6 was doing in a night, Fable 5 does in an hour. Capabilities are incredible." in 40-minute session, Anthropic's Head of Product share the capabilities of Fable 5 and his workflow. Watch today, then read the article below.

Codez

32,488 次观看 • 1 个月前

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

443,022 次观看 • 6 个月前

Things we discussed in our new podcast episode: → AI agents with their own social network → Vitalik's alternative to the AGI arms race → DAC8 quietly expanding crypto surveillance in Europe → Claude Opus 4.6 as an actual coworker → Whether privacy can survive what's coming Just the stuff that matters Bon appetit 👌

Things we discussed in our new podcast episode: → AI agents with their own social network → Vitalik's alternative to the AGI arms race → DAC8 quietly expanding crypto surveillance in Europe → Claude Opus 4.6 as an actual coworker → Whether privacy can survive what's coming Just the stuff that matters Bon appetit 👌

Mihnea

14,894 次观看 • 5 个月前