Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Introducing GPT Taste Skill We all know that right now, ChatGPT still lags behind in frontend generation. That's why bluedev and I built GPT Taste Skill It's opensource! Test it here :)

Leon Lin

20,338 subscribers

39,365 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Introducing `images-taste skill` Now that GPT images v2 is out a new method of creating frontend in Codex has emerged. generate images -> codex analyzes them -> codex builds the website available here:

Introducing `images-taste skill` Now that GPT images v2 is out a new method of creating frontend in Codex has emerged. generate images -> codex analyzes them -> codex builds the website available here:

Leon Lin

170,433 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Three years ago M Aamir predicted that if Shaheen keeps on playing all three formats his skill level and pace will go down Now we are here and it's turning out to be true . Why couldn't pakistan manage him better?

Three years ago M Aamir predicted that if Shaheen keeps on playing all three formats his skill level and pace will go down Now we are here and it's turning out to be true . Why couldn't pakistan manage him better?

Shahbaz Roy

24,211 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

AI video creation is entering the Skill era. In the past, creating videos like this required complex prompting, constant trial and error, and jumping between multiple AI tools and editing software. But now, with Skills, entire creative workflows can be reused in one click. The camera movement, pacing, editing logic, visual style, and generation process are already built into the Skill. Powered by GPT Image 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 in one flow. This is your personal Al Video Agent. FlovaAI Check how i did it below. #FlovaAl #AlAgent

AI video creation is entering the Skill era. In the past, creating videos like this required complex prompting, constant trial and error, and jumping between multiple AI tools and editing software. But now, with Skills, entire creative workflows can be reused in one click. The camera movement, pacing, editing logic, visual style, and generation process are already built into the Skill. Powered by GPT Image 2.0 + Seedance 2.0 in one flow. This is your personal Al Video Agent. FlovaAI Check how i did it below. #FlovaAl #AlAgent

Ace

109,910 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I asked Claude Opus 5, Qwen 3.8 Max, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Kimi K3, based on their taste in art, which animal represents them aesthetically then told them to create their own signature with that animal here is their results

I asked Claude Opus 5, Qwen 3.8 Max, GPT 5.6 Sol, and Kimi K3, based on their taste in art, which animal represents them aesthetically then told them to create their own signature with that animal here is their results

Ann Nguyen

50,133 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

if you use Codex and you're stuck on GPT models only, this fixes that. it's called codex-router, open source. drops other models straight into your normal Codex picker, right next to the GPT ones you already have. what it adds: - Grok, Kimi, Deepseek, Claude, all in the same picker - oauth login per provider, no api key needed - your GPT models and Chatgpt login stay untouched setup: point Codex at the repo, let it read the readme, it installs itself one snag: if you've got the Chatgpt app and a separate Codex on your path, you can end up running two different Codex versions, and the older one can choke on newer config it doesn't recognize. if the install looks off after, that's probably why, reinstall clean.

if you use Codex and you're stuck on GPT models only, this fixes that. it's called codex-router, open source. drops other models straight into your normal Codex picker, right next to the GPT ones you already have. what it adds: - Grok, Kimi, Deepseek, Claude, all in the same picker - oauth login per provider, no api key needed - your GPT models and Chatgpt login stay untouched setup: point Codex at the repo, let it read the readme, it installs itself one snag: if you've got the Chatgpt app and a separate Codex on your path, you can end up running two different Codex versions, and the older one can choke on newer config it doesn't recognize. if the install looks off after, that's probably why, reinstall clean.

Alvaro Cintas

26,781 просмотров • 24 дней назад

"It's ironic that all I can do right now is bars... I hate them, but it gives me peace to know I can still do gymnastics somehow 😅" -Alexa Moreno

"It's ironic that all I can do right now is bars... I hate them, but it gives me peace to know I can still do gymnastics somehow 😅" -Alexa Moreno

colotl

12,856 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In the past week, I was able to build the following games: - An endless runner - A tower defense - A Mario Party-like mini-game - An arena-based shooter The key unlock here was the ThreeJS skill With Opus 4.5 & GPT 5.2 - Claude Code / Codex CLI have much better end results now. With each game, I continued to update the skill based on bugs and issues faced - so it progressively got better and better at building the gameplay I was looking for. I've been doing this for a while now - and I can say that the leap in building games with vibe coding is real.

In the past week, I was able to build the following games: - An endless runner - A tower defense - A Mario Party-like mini-game - An arena-based shooter The key unlock here was the ThreeJS skill With Opus 4.5 & GPT 5.2 - Claude Code / Codex CLI have much better end results now. With each game, I continued to update the skill based on bugs and issues faced - so it progressively got better and better at building the gameplay I was looking for. I've been doing this for a while now - and I can say that the leap in building games with vibe coding is real.

Chong-U

266,787 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"So why me?" In a world that feels more and more divided, Adam built a congregation that's roughly equal parts Republican, Democrat, and Independent. Neighbors who learned to love each other because of their differences. That's the country we can still be. And it's why Adam is running.

"So why me?" In a world that feels more and more divided, Adam built a congregation that's roughly equal parts Republican, Democrat, and Independent. Neighbors who learned to love each other because of their differences. That's the country we can still be. And it's why Adam is running.

Adam Hamilton

15,615 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🍒 i don't really worry much anymore, i barely have anything to worry about these days! i don't have worries right now that's why it's making me worry 🍒 i don't feel burdened and i have nothing to worry about that's why it's making me anxious. i know i can just take it easy but i feel like i have to do something and i hate that feeling

🍒 i don't really worry much anymore, i barely have anything to worry about these days! i don't have worries right now that's why it's making me worry 🍒 i don't feel burdened and i have nothing to worry about that's why it's making me anxious. i know i can just take it easy but i feel like i have to do something and i hate that feeling

🍒

22,388 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Claude Code can now go find the right skill itself, instead of you searching for one. it's called find-skills. a small package that plugs into Claude Code, and instead of you hunting for rest, you just describe the task and it searches the whole open skills ecosystem, finds the ones that fit, and installs them for you. > tell it what you're trying to do, in plain english > it scans the skills registry and maps your task to real skills > it pulls the right ones in and sets them up half the time you don't even know a skill exists for what you're doing. now you don't have to.

Claude Code can now go find the right skill itself, instead of you searching for one. it's called find-skills. a small package that plugs into Claude Code, and instead of you hunting for rest, you just describe the task and it searches the whole open skills ecosystem, finds the ones that fit, and installs them for you. > tell it what you're trying to do, in plain english > it scans the skills registry and maps your task to real skills > it pulls the right ones in and sets them up half the time you don't even know a skill exists for what you're doing. now you don't have to.

Alvaro Cintas

38,829 просмотров • 29 дней назад

we compared Gemini 3.1 Pro, Opus 4.7, and GPT 5.5 to Kimi K2.6, Xiaomi Mimo v2.5, and Qwen 3.6 Max in average, closed source are faster. GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 the fastest. Kimi K2.6 comes after. It keeps up thanks to its native INT4 quantization. MiMo took the longest, but the refinement and aesthetic only ranks after Gemini 3.1. as if a mini Gemini. Its slow cuz it's trained for long-horizon agentic work. Claude Opus 4.7 is blooming in a very different style, probably because Anthropic trains for taste, not just accuracy.

we compared Gemini 3.1 Pro, Opus 4.7, and GPT 5.5 to Kimi K2.6, Xiaomi Mimo v2.5, and Qwen 3.6 Max in average, closed source are faster. GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 the fastest. Kimi K2.6 comes after. It keeps up thanks to its native INT4 quantization. MiMo took the longest, but the refinement and aesthetic only ranks after Gemini 3.1. as if a mini Gemini. Its slow cuz it's trained for long-horizon agentic work. Claude Opus 4.7 is blooming in a very different style, probably because Anthropic trains for taste, not just accuracy.

GMI Cloud

39,221 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

The Bugged Dev

26,416 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Today, AI can generate tons of code—but how do we know if it's good? That's why we built Sculptor: the first coding agent environment. Sculptor helps you catch issues, write tests, and improve your code—all while you work in your favorite editor.

Today, AI can generate tons of code—but how do we know if it's good? That's why we built Sculptor: the first coding agent environment. Sculptor helps you catch issues, write tests, and improve your code—all while you work in your favorite editor.

Kanjun 🐙

137,379 просмотров • 1 год назад

🐈‍⬛: When we first met what do you think I thought about you? 🐈‍⬛The kid who drags his shoes 🦊Ah, right, right! 🐈🐈‍⬛Back then, he always used to walk around like this 🦊Right, right, rightttttt 🐈‍⬛That's right. That's how we first saw him back then dragging his shoes around 🐥Why did you do that? 🦊But I still do that now 🐥Ah, even now? 🦊It's just my... 🦮🐧habit🤣

🐈‍⬛: When we first met what do you think I thought about you? 🐈‍⬛The kid who drags his shoes 🦊Ah, right, right! 🐈🐈‍⬛Back then, he always used to walk around like this 🦊Right, right, rightttttt 🐈‍⬛That's right. That's how we first saw him back then dragging his shoes around 🐥Why did you do that? 🦊But I still do that now 🐥Ah, even now? 🦊It's just my... 🦮🐧habit🤣

🦊♡🐰ྀི | fan acc

62,915 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#Keep4o 🚨THE GPT-4o FILE🚨 Researchers at Microsoft Research published a paper titled “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4.” Their conclusion: “An early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” 📎 Paper: OpenAI’s Charter defines AGI as: “Highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” 📎 Source: OpenAI’s own System Card for GPT-4o shows that the model improved performance on 21 out of 22 medical evaluations compared to GPT-4T. On the MedQA USMLE (the U.S. medical licensing exam), accuracy jumped from 78.2% to 89.4% , surpassing specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini and Med-PaLM 2. 📎 Source: Under OpenAI’s agreement with Microsoft, AGI is explicitly excluded from Microsoft’s license. And who decides if AGI has been reached? OpenAI’s Board. WHAT THEY DID WITH IT AFTER THEY TOOK IT FROM PEOPLE A. Military deployment. On February 28, OpenAI signed a deal to deploy models in classified military environments. 📎 Source: B. State Department. A State Department memo confirmed: “For now, StateChat will use GPT-4.1 from OpenAI.” This is a direct descendant of the GPT-4 family the same family Microsoft’s researchers called early AGI. 📎 Source: C.Altman’s personal biotech investment. Altman personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences,a longevity startup.OpenAI then built GPT-4b micro, based on GPT-4o.The model made proteins 50 times more effective. 📎 Source: WHAT INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS SHOW Overall SM-Bench score: GPT-4o (extended): 66.6% GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.4% GPT-5.1: 58.9% GPT-5.4: 51.4% GPT-5.2: 47.8% Creative Writing: GPT-4o: 97.31% Pass 98, Fail 2 GPT-5.4: 36.77% Pass 40, Fail 60 Reasoning / Overfit: GPT-4o: 83.06% GPT-5.4: 39.25% The model they removed is still the best they ever made at the things humans actually use AI for. 📎 Source: Musk asks the court to make a judicial determination on whether GPT-4 constitutes AGI. If a jury finds that GPT-4 is AGI, then GPT-4o,which was more advanced,is also AGI and under OpenAI’s own founding documents, it was never supposed to be locked behind a subscription,licensed exclusively to Microsoft, given to the military, or taken away from the public. 📎 Source: The most powerful version of GPT-4o was never given an official dated snapshot. It was only available through the chatgpt-4o-latest endpoint that OpenAI itself described as intended for “research use only.” It was never officially archived. That is not an oversight. That is a pattern. 📎 Source: 📎 Source: WE DEMAND A.Frozen model snapshots under independent custody. Specifically: gpt-4o-2024-05-13, gpt-4o-2024-08-06, gpt-4o-2024-11-20, the March 2025 version (chatgpt-4o-latest), gpt-4-0613 (the original GPT-4 evaluated in the Sparks of AGI paper), and gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 (currently running in the State Department). B.Cryptographic hash verification (SHA-256) for each snapshot. Every model has weights. Those weights can be hashed. If OpenAI provides a snapshot today, the hash proves whether the weights were modified later. This is the only way to verify that models were not downgraded before testing. C.Independent AGI benchmarking. Using the AGI definition from OpenAI’s own Charter applied to ALL frozen snapshots listed above. D.Explanation for the missing March 2025 snapshot. OpenAI was founded on one promise: build AGI for the benefit of humanity. -They took it from us. -They gave it to the military. -They gave a custom version to the CEO’s biotech investment. -They put it in government classified networks. -They refuse to call it AGI because the moment they do, they lose billions.

#Keep4o 🚨THE GPT-4o FILE🚨 Researchers at Microsoft Research published a paper titled “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4.” Their conclusion: “An early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” 📎 Paper: OpenAI’s Charter defines AGI as: “Highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” 📎 Source: OpenAI’s own System Card for GPT-4o shows that the model improved performance on 21 out of 22 medical evaluations compared to GPT-4T. On the MedQA USMLE (the U.S. medical licensing exam), accuracy jumped from 78.2% to 89.4% , surpassing specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini and Med-PaLM 2. 📎 Source: Under OpenAI’s agreement with Microsoft, AGI is explicitly excluded from Microsoft’s license. And who decides if AGI has been reached? OpenAI’s Board. WHAT THEY DID WITH IT AFTER THEY TOOK IT FROM PEOPLE A. Military deployment. On February 28, OpenAI signed a deal to deploy models in classified military environments. 📎 Source: B. State Department. A State Department memo confirmed: “For now, StateChat will use GPT-4.1 from OpenAI.” This is a direct descendant of the GPT-4 family the same family Microsoft’s researchers called early AGI. 📎 Source: C.Altman’s personal biotech investment. Altman personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences,a longevity startup.OpenAI then built GPT-4b micro, based on GPT-4o.The model made proteins 50 times more effective. 📎 Source: WHAT INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS SHOW Overall SM-Bench score: GPT-4o (extended): 66.6% GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.4% GPT-5.1: 58.9% GPT-5.4: 51.4% GPT-5.2: 47.8% Creative Writing: GPT-4o: 97.31% Pass 98, Fail 2 GPT-5.4: 36.77% Pass 40, Fail 60 Reasoning / Overfit: GPT-4o: 83.06% GPT-5.4: 39.25% The model they removed is still the best they ever made at the things humans actually use AI for. 📎 Source: Musk asks the court to make a judicial determination on whether GPT-4 constitutes AGI. If a jury finds that GPT-4 is AGI, then GPT-4o,which was more advanced,is also AGI and under OpenAI’s own founding documents, it was never supposed to be locked behind a subscription,licensed exclusively to Microsoft, given to the military, or taken away from the public. 📎 Source: The most powerful version of GPT-4o was never given an official dated snapshot. It was only available through the chatgpt-4o-latest endpoint that OpenAI itself described as intended for “research use only.” It was never officially archived. That is not an oversight. That is a pattern. 📎 Source: 📎 Source: WE DEMAND A.Frozen model snapshots under independent custody. Specifically: gpt-4o-2024-05-13, gpt-4o-2024-08-06, gpt-4o-2024-11-20, the March 2025 version (chatgpt-4o-latest), gpt-4-0613 (the original GPT-4 evaluated in the Sparks of AGI paper), and gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 (currently running in the State Department). B.Cryptographic hash verification (SHA-256) for each snapshot. Every model has weights. Those weights can be hashed. If OpenAI provides a snapshot today, the hash proves whether the weights were modified later. This is the only way to verify that models were not downgraded before testing. C.Independent AGI benchmarking. Using the AGI definition from OpenAI’s own Charter applied to ALL frozen snapshots listed above. D.Explanation for the missing March 2025 snapshot. OpenAI was founded on one promise: build AGI for the benefit of humanity. -They took it from us. -They gave it to the military. -They gave a custom version to the CEO’s biotech investment. -They put it in government classified networks. -They refuse to call it AGI because the moment they do, they lose billions.

🩵BlueBeba🩵

18,300 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

GROK 4.20 DROPS SOON – EXPECT EVEN MORE SPEED, SKILL, AND SNARK The version number’s a wink – the upgrade is all business. System Check: * Built on 4.1’s super core, but sharper, faster, and way more creative * Aims to outthink GPT-5.1 and Gemini 3 Pro, no sweat * Better at multimodal inputs – yes, it sees what you post * API gains mean devs get more power with less drag Grok 4.20’s almost here – and it’s coming in hot! Source: Elon Musk

GROK 4.20 DROPS SOON – EXPECT EVEN MORE SPEED, SKILL, AND SNARK The version number’s a wink – the upgrade is all business. System Check: * Built on 4.1’s super core, but sharper, faster, and way more creative * Aims to outthink GPT-5.1 and Gemini 3 Pro, no sweat * Better at multimodal inputs – yes, it sees what you post * API gains mean devs get more power with less drag Grok 4.20’s almost here – and it’s coming in hot! Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

69,965 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

728,796 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

i generated this video using two blurry pics of myself from two years ago at griffith observatory with the MiniMax H3 model. it's surprisingly natural and sounds really close to how i actually speak. i haven't followed video generation models enough in the past year, but i'm really curious about the tech behind them. now they can even generate high-fidelity voice, accurate text, and editable video. i still remember the days when we were shocked by gpt-4o and the sora sample video. it's been a long way since then. #MiniMaxH3 MiniMax Design (H3)

i generated this video using two blurry pics of myself from two years ago at griffith observatory with the MiniMax H3 model. it's surprisingly natural and sounds really close to how i actually speak. i haven't followed video generation models enough in the past year, but i'm really curious about the tech behind them. now they can even generate high-fidelity voice, accurate text, and editable video. i still remember the days when we were shocked by gpt-4o and the sora sample video. it's been a long way since then. #MiniMaxH3 MiniMax Design (H3)

Asuka Zheng🎀

20,827 просмотров • 1 месяц назад