Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Introducing LinqOps Most companies are open to cheaper, more flexible compute. What they’re not open to is managing wallets, custody, token purchases and an entirely new treasury process just to access it. That’s the gap #LinqOps closes. 🧵👇

13,331 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

OpenAI chairman Bret Taylor talks to about 100 CEOs every month. His answer to the cheap open-weight model panic: cheaper to train does not mean cheaper to use, and the number that decides it is token efficiency. "One thing that I think is a little bit overblown about these open weight models is they're not necessarily cheaper to run. Whether or not they're cheaper to train, you don't care. Because you're using just as many tokens. In fact, they may be less efficient." "There's this thing called token efficiency. And it turns out the frontier models are much, much more token efficient." "A token is to intelligence like a watt is to electricity... how many tokens does it take to complete a task? Not every token is actually equal." "For a lot of tasks, it turns out these frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic are actually just better than these open weight models... just having open weights isn't actually the main thing driving any of those costs." Later in the same interview he goes after the billing unit itself: "It would be like if you signed up for Gmail and you paid for CPU cycle or something... where the world is going is paying for outcomes." The unresolved column: the chart CNBC airs mid-answer, from Artificial Analysis, prices a completed task at $0.94 on Kimi K3 against $2.75 on Claude Fable 5, efficiency folded in. If that gap holds, the premium he is defending gets earned on quality, not price. - Bret Taylor (Bret Taylor), OpenAI chairman and Sierra co-founder, on CNBC's Squawk Box.

Karl Mehta

16,614 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen