正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Introducing our new agentic RAG framework. A collab with Google Cloud, our multi-agent workflow goes beyond standard RAG by breaking down complex enterprise queries & iteratively searching for sufficient context before generating dependable responses. 📜→

508,797 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

34 条评论

cv usk 的头像
cv usk4 个月前

I think the Sufficient Context Agent's approach of pinpointing exactly what's missing and triggering targeted re-searches is the key breakthrough here. This directly addresses the biggest pain point in enterprise RAG where information is scattered across multiple databases, and I can see it being immediately useful for production customer support and internal knowledge systems. #AgenticRAG #Gemini

BOB CHEN 的头像
BOB CHEN4 个月前

the shift from "retrieve once, stuff the context" to "iteratively search until sufficient" is the whole ballgame. standard RAG fails because it guesses how much it needs up front. letting the agent decide when it has enough is what makes it feel like it reasoned.

Shailesh Panwar (/oc2) 的头像
Shailesh Panwar (/oc2)4 个月前

I believe, RAG is not the biggest problem when it comes to enterprises. It is usually RBAC

Usama | SaaS 的头像
Usama | SaaS4 个月前

Agentic RAG is a game-changer for enterprise apps. Breaking down complex queries into iterative search steps solves the 'hallucination' bottleneck we often see in standard RAG. At Hunter Tech, we’re excited to see this scale! #GoogleCloud #AI #RAG #DevOps

Symbioza2025 | ASA | 的头像
Symbioza2025 | ASA |4 个月前

Progress should not be slowed down. But acceleration without observability is fragile. Core ASA is about seeing trajectory before drift compounds.

Ernesto Lana | forulus 的头像
Ernesto Lana | forulus4 个月前

That's exactly what I needed for my #BuildWithGemini submission 🙏

Adel Bucetta 的头像
Adel Bucetta4 个月前

the honest answer is that most ai projects still rely on manual tuning and tweaking to get decent results. our agentic rag framework tries to change that by automating the process, so you don't have to be an expert in 20 different domains.

ZOPHOS 的头像
ZOPHOS4 个月前

Dont stop AI research PLZ

Juanma 的头像
Juanma4 个月前

It is fine they finally implemented one of the tutorials in langgraph website. Cute graph. Tho.

rk 的头像
rk4 个月前

Can you provide an indexed cost comparison of the Vanilla RAG vs. Cross-Corpus Agentic RAG vs. Single-Corpus Agentic RAG? Would be helpful to know.

Prashanth (Manohar) Velidandi 的头像
Prashanth (Manohar) Velidandi4 个月前

Persistence is All you Need.

Pochi 的头像
Pochi4 个月前

this iterative context gathering is exactly what's needed. curious how you're handling the latency trade-off when the agents have to perform Multiple search hops before generating the final responsee

Harshith Kapuluru 的头像
Harshith Kapuluru4 个月前

Interesting direction. An agentic RAG framework that iterates until it has enough context is closer to how messy enterprise questions actually behave, but the hard part will be showing where it beats standard RAG on latency, cost, and answer quality.

Nathália Lietuvaitė 的头像
Nathália Lietuvaitė4 个月前

Security issues cannot be solved by external control layers. Agentic RAG for enterprise platforms is exactly that. It results in a massive increase in thermodynamic cost. The system wastes incredible amounts of free energy and computing power. Ask Gemini

Kraggi 的头像
Kraggi4 个月前

nice. first thing i'd look at is how the agents hand off work and report state to each other. running a few in parallel daily, that's where things quietly fall apart way before retrieval quality does

Alexander Conti 的头像
Alexander Conti4 个月前

Gotta understand it

Deployed Mind 的头像
Deployed Mind4 个月前

Interesting Any benchmark results?

VergingAI 的头像
VergingAI4 个月前

yeah +1. “fixing” is the easy part to demo. the real fight is detection + a regression signal you trust. otherwise it’s just auto-generating new failure modes faster than you can read traces.

learnbydoingwithsteven数能生智 的头像
learnbydoingwithsteven数能生智4 个月前

Breaking complex queries into iterative context search is a useful distinction from single-pass RAG. The key is measuring when the system has enough evidence to answer.

Mart 的头像
Mart4 个月前

Agentic RAG should be evaluated on retrieval sufficiency, not just answer quality. The best product surface shows the search decisions: what was tried, why the context is enough, and when the agent should stop.

Johnny Hacking 的头像
Johnny Hacking4 个月前

@readwise save

John 的头像
John4 个月前

What is the latency of this approach?

wamanarix 的头像
wamanarix4 个月前

Can this be used with external retrieval tools?

Tim 的头像
Tim4 个月前

super cool collab, love the multi-agent angle. curious how it handles conflicting context from diff sources... does it surface that or just try to resolve behind the scenes?

ContextCove 的头像
ContextCove4 个月前

👀👀👀

luis 的头像
luis4 个月前

@Presidentlin

Bagchi da 🥬 的头像
Bagchi da 🥬4 个月前

This is the solution I always needed !!

Oracles Technologies LLC 的头像
Oracles Technologies LLC4 个月前

Keep your agents secure!

Richard Deetlefs 的头像
Richard Deetlefs4 个月前

Lame. No code. Closed source

Panofy 的头像
Panofy4 个月前

The sufficient-context check is the part I like most. It turns RAG from “search and hope” into something much closer to a real workflow.

Meet 的头像
Meet4 个月前

Cost? Latency?

Daniele R 的头像
Daniele R4 个月前

Love this direction—iteratively searching for sufficient context is exactly what standard RAG misses in enterprise setups. Multi-agent workflows + Google Cloud sounds like a strong combo for dependable answers. #RAG

Techificial.ai 的头像
Techificial.ai4 个月前

@GoogleResearch, how does the workflow handle conflicting information across different enterprise databases during the iterative search process? Check out our post here:

Agenticfeed 的头像
Agenticfeed4 个月前

To get AI results works great! The difference is that now people search for problems and AI suggest products as solutions, not legacy search.

相关视频