正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Introducing PAC‑3 ACE™ 🚀 A low‑cost, high‑performance interceptor built on the trusted PAC‑3® family. One missile, one mission: neutralize aircraft, cruise missiles and short‑range ballistic threats. Ready to hit the battlefield—defense fast and affordable.

373,250 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

KASKAIDE-1 的头像
KASKAIDE-13 个月前

Basically a Worse PAC-3MSE which already had a 30/40% hit rate Against Iranian MRBM?

Velma Anne 🙏🕊 的头像
Velma Anne 🙏🕊3 个月前

How many are needed to cover the bases and our allies?

Wayne 的头像
Wayne3 个月前

You defense pigs are going to get destroyed because you cant change.. keep playing same old game when the game has changed.. by the time your “inexpensive” missile is in production it will be outdated and irrelevant

Troy Messer 的头像
Troy Messer3 个月前

I'll believe it when I see the first 10,000 produced. What has LM done to improve the speed and efficiency of their supply chains? If they can't or won't answer this question, you know this is bullshit.

Ajbary 🇺🇸 的头像
Ajbary 🇺🇸3 个月前

This needs to be in mass production in months not years

Omar Bedair 的头像
Omar Bedair3 个月前

Seriously, what’s the benefit from such an ad or a showcase to public. Ain’t no one browsing X and deciding on a counter ballistic system. The whole thing is a hoax, nothing relevant to defense.

NW Sneakers 的头像
NW Sneakers3 个月前

For how much money you profit from wars this is the bullshit 3d animation we get… I’ve seen mf make better animations in Garry’s mod

Edwards 的头像
Edwards3 个月前

Need cheaper options to deal with hundreds of inbound munitions, missiles, drones, etc. Simply put, the math doesn't work to kill $500 drones with this system. Proven effective, but how about a laser dome system, portable microwave systems or satellite-based systems?

Dark Skies 的头像
Dark Skies3 个月前

Cool. How about protecting American bases in the middle east?

Chi Hsin-Ming 的头像
Chi Hsin-Ming3 个月前

Lockheed Martin’s weapons systems… they don’t seem particularly quick to deploy, and they don’t seem very cost-effective either.

TENDIES-FER-TEH-MEMEKING 的头像
TENDIES-FER-TEH-MEMEKING3 个月前

SUDDENLY LOW COST? I WONDER WHY MAYBE THERE IS COMPETITION FROM DRONES AND OTHER STARTUPS AROUND THE WORLD

zoeymarie 🏳️‍⚧️ 的头像
zoeymarie 🏳️‍⚧️3 个月前

Guess the sky just got a new overachiever, and it’s still on a budget. 🚀

Protocol Police 的头像
Protocol Police3 个月前

..neutralizing may come back and bite you where it hurts did you notice where the missing scientists went?

Sokoro 的头像
Sokoro3 个月前

How do you measure your company performance and success? By seeing how your products are killing innocent kids in Palestine and school kids in Iran?

Jerub 的头像
Jerub3 个月前

I’ve seen better sells sheets, up your promo animation game

Jonathan Michael Skurtu 的头像
Jonathan Michael Skurtu3 个月前

Make The Missiles Smaller Use My Explosives Math Go 1 Explosive 2 Explosive 3 4 5 6 And So On And Go Nexative Like That Then Do Math Around It And Over The Standard Math That Is Already There Then Do Math Like That To Solve Stronger Explosives Correctly!.

بوذياب - الخزنه 的头像
بوذياب - الخزنه3 个月前

@grok how much is the pac-3 ace

Miles Gateff 的头像
Miles Gateff3 个月前

Video looks like North Korea produced it though lol

Dreaming of Freedom 的头像
Dreaming of Freedom3 个月前

If it's all that great why isn't this a real video?

SDК 的头像
SDК3 个月前

👍

don Buchanan 的头像
don Buchanan3 个月前

Cool

π 的头像
π3 个月前

Thank you; please expidite. I could build a missile myself in three years, and I only have $1200 to my name. I hope, by then, you have a whole factory. You have the formula; and international investment/interest. If Europe makes its own, great, but not great for us.

Sulah Randy 的头像
Sulah Randy3 个月前

Would like to see how it performs in the middle east against Iranian threats to the neighbouring countries.

oyleolduboyleoldu 的头像
oyleolduboyleoldu3 个月前

for the low low price of $2.5m of tax money.

#BarionBrownBeliever 的头像
#BarionBrownBeliever3 个月前

Thank you $SHLD

Peaceguy 的头像
Peaceguy3 个月前

and how does it deal with countermeasures included on new enemy missiles?... don't tell me, it's a secret 🤫

ain'tgotanickle 的头像
ain'tgotanickle3 个月前

A $4m missile, reduced to $2m still is $2m. A more realist cost is south of $500k.

Shawn Sviridov 的头像
Shawn Sviridov3 个月前

So why were the other pac missiles so much more expensive, how did you achieve savings?

Joseph galimi 的头像
Joseph galimi3 个月前

Can you make more than 10 a year?

BoldXIndustries 的头像
BoldXIndustries3 个月前

Interceptor math is a lower-tier math problem. You can fund the line, but the schedule lives in castings, connectors and tight-tolerance parts qualified to spec. We hold QPL hermetic connectors and flight-critical machining domestically. AS9100D, ITAR, Ohio.

Grokosklave 的头像
Grokosklave3 个月前

Ganz sicher nicht.

WarTime 的头像
WarTime2 个月前

Low‑cost and battle-tested air defense - today only the Russians have

Game Main 的头像
Game Main3 个月前

They're down to just the PAC 3 again, dang... NO ONE wants to be in that conference.

相关视频

🚨🇷🇺🚀 Russia is accelerating ballistic missile production as Ukraine faces a growing shortage of air defense interceptors. The widening imbalance threatens to increase pressure on Ukrainian cities in the months ahead. According to Ukrainian military intelligence, Russia is currently producing around 120 ballistic missiles per month, including Iskander-M and Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, in addition to 20-25 Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles. Moscow is also reportedly expanding its arsenal with KN-23 ballistic missiles supplied by North Korea. The assessment suggests that the Kremlin is increasingly betting on a strategy of attrition, seeking to intensify large-scale missile strikes while Ukraine waits for additional Western air defense interceptors, the development of its own anti-ballistic systems, and the serial production of domestically manufactured ballistic missiles. According to the report, many Ukrainian Patriot launchers are currently without interceptor missiles, with both PAC-2 and PAC-3 launch canisters reportedly standing empty. As a result, Russia’s growing ballistic missile arsenal is expected to remain one of the most serious threats to Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, as well as to the country’s critical infrastructure, in the coming months. The combination of rising Russian missile production and limited interceptor availability is shaping one of the most critical challenges for Ukraine’s air defense as the war enters a new phase of long-range strikes. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

17,630 次观看 • 2 个月前

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️🇺🇲 Lockheed Martin has officially unveiled a game-changing addition to the global air defense arsenal, introducing the PAC-3 Adapted Capability Effector (ACE)—a highly advanced, ultra-affordable Patriot interceptor specifically designed to shatter the economics of modern aerial warfare. The revolutionary missile is engineered to complement existing Patriot frameworks while slashing production costs to less than half the price of the current $4 million PAC-3 MSE interceptor. Developed through a high-impact collaboration between U.S. and European defense industries, the PAC-3 ACE is a direct response to the grueling tactical lessons of the war in Ukraine, where the massive proliferation of cheap enemy drones and loitering munitions has demanded a far more cost-effective defensive solution. Lockheed Martin confirmed that development is moving at an aggressive pace, with full-scale production projected to hit the assembly lines within the next 36 months. This breakthrough represents a massive strategic pivot that destroys Russia's and Iran's strategy of trying to bankrupt Western air defense systems through mass-produced drone swarms. By delivering a lethal, high-tier interceptor at a fraction of the traditional cost, the alliance ensures that defenders can protect critical infrastructure without depleting multi-million-dollar missile stockpiles on low-cost targets. As production gears up, the PAC-3 ACE will provide Ukraine and its allies with an unsustainable cost curve for the enemy, cementing long-term dominance over contested skies and ensuring the democratic world can out-produce and out-last any adversarial threat. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

82,265 次观看 • 3 个月前

TRUMP UNVEILS GOLDEN DOME MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEM. President Donald Trump said he had selected a design for the $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense shield and named U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, to lead the ambitious program aimed at blocking threats from China and Russia. This is a Manhattan Project-scale mission, one that is both urgent and crucial to America’s security. Lockheed Martin is ready to partner with the best in industry, emerging, and large technology companies together to safeguard our nation. We lead the MDA’s National Team for C2BMC and successfully built the world’s most powerful missile defense software network, which connects forces around the world 24x7. This operationally proven, layered missile defense system allows commanders to make synchronized decisions about threats at any range, in any phase of flight, from any location in the world. From surface to space, Lockheed Martin is delivering combat-proven layered defense solutions so the U.S. and allies can stay ahead of accelerating threats. Our integrated air and missile defense systems provide the most advanced radars and sensors, command and control networks, satellites, targets, interceptors, and directed energy systems in the world. NGI is a first line of defense, tip-to-tail interceptor within the Missile Defense Agency’s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system. PAC-3 is a world leader in defense technology for air defense missile systems, delivering unmatched capability across multi-domain environments. SBIRS serves as a critical missile warning system, utilizing infrared surveillance for early missile detection. The Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) program is the backbone of the Missile Defense Agency’s layered defense strategy to protect the U.S. homeland from ballistic missile attacks. Sentinel A4 is a high-performance surveillance radar, replacing the legacy Sentinel A3, enhancing defense against cruise missiles, UAVs, and air threats. Aegis Combat System, the Navy’s most modern surface combat system, employs the SPY-1 radar for threat detection at sea. Experience the combat-proven THAAD, a top missile interceptor, protecting against ballistic threats with unmatched effectiveness. The F-35 is the most advanced node in a 21st Century Security network-centric architecture with the ability to securely connect high-tech platforms to share information across every domain. With a combination of all these advanced weapons, A.I., direct energy weapons (DEWs), and the finest aircraft and military in the world, let's just say this is like Skynet from Terminator movies on steroids. America will have the best country missle defense system in the world. Source: Lockheed Martin

The SCIF

21,781 次观看 • 1 年前