Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Introducing PAC‑3 ACE™ 🚀 A low‑cost, high‑performance interceptor built on the trusted PAC‑3® family. One missile, one mission: neutralize aircraft, cruise missiles and short‑range ballistic threats. Ready to hit the battlefield—defense fast and affordable.

373,250 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

KASKAIDE-1 profil fotoğrafı
KASKAIDE-13 ay önce

Basically a Worse PAC-3MSE which already had a 30/40% hit rate Against Iranian MRBM?

Velma Anne 🙏🕊 profil fotoğrafı
Velma Anne 🙏🕊3 ay önce

How many are needed to cover the bases and our allies?

Wayne profil fotoğrafı
Wayne3 ay önce

You defense pigs are going to get destroyed because you cant change.. keep playing same old game when the game has changed.. by the time your “inexpensive” missile is in production it will be outdated and irrelevant

Troy Messer profil fotoğrafı
Troy Messer3 ay önce

I'll believe it when I see the first 10,000 produced. What has LM done to improve the speed and efficiency of their supply chains? If they can't or won't answer this question, you know this is bullshit.

Ajbary 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
Ajbary 🇺🇸3 ay önce

This needs to be in mass production in months not years

Omar Bedair profil fotoğrafı
Omar Bedair3 ay önce

Seriously, what’s the benefit from such an ad or a showcase to public. Ain’t no one browsing X and deciding on a counter ballistic system. The whole thing is a hoax, nothing relevant to defense.

NW Sneakers profil fotoğrafı
NW Sneakers3 ay önce

For how much money you profit from wars this is the bullshit 3d animation we get… I’ve seen mf make better animations in Garry’s mod

Edwards profil fotoğrafı
Edwards3 ay önce

Need cheaper options to deal with hundreds of inbound munitions, missiles, drones, etc. Simply put, the math doesn't work to kill $500 drones with this system. Proven effective, but how about a laser dome system, portable microwave systems or satellite-based systems?

Dark Skies profil fotoğrafı
Dark Skies3 ay önce

Cool. How about protecting American bases in the middle east?

Chi Hsin-Ming profil fotoğrafı
Chi Hsin-Ming3 ay önce

Lockheed Martin’s weapons systems… they don’t seem particularly quick to deploy, and they don’t seem very cost-effective either.

TENDIES-FER-TEH-MEMEKING profil fotoğrafı
TENDIES-FER-TEH-MEMEKING3 ay önce

SUDDENLY LOW COST? I WONDER WHY MAYBE THERE IS COMPETITION FROM DRONES AND OTHER STARTUPS AROUND THE WORLD

zoeymarie 🏳️‍⚧️ profil fotoğrafı
zoeymarie 🏳️‍⚧️3 ay önce

Guess the sky just got a new overachiever, and it’s still on a budget. 🚀

Protocol Police profil fotoğrafı
Protocol Police3 ay önce

..neutralizing may come back and bite you where it hurts did you notice where the missing scientists went?

Sokoro profil fotoğrafı
Sokoro3 ay önce

How do you measure your company performance and success? By seeing how your products are killing innocent kids in Palestine and school kids in Iran?

Jerub profil fotoğrafı
Jerub3 ay önce

I’ve seen better sells sheets, up your promo animation game

Jonathan Michael Skurtu profil fotoğrafı
Jonathan Michael Skurtu3 ay önce

Make The Missiles Smaller Use My Explosives Math Go 1 Explosive 2 Explosive 3 4 5 6 And So On And Go Nexative Like That Then Do Math Around It And Over The Standard Math That Is Already There Then Do Math Like That To Solve Stronger Explosives Correctly!.

بوذياب - الخزنه profil fotoğrafı
بوذياب - الخزنه3 ay önce

@grok how much is the pac-3 ace

Miles Gateff profil fotoğrafı
Miles Gateff3 ay önce

Video looks like North Korea produced it though lol

Dreaming of Freedom profil fotoğrafı
Dreaming of Freedom3 ay önce

If it's all that great why isn't this a real video?

SDК profil fotoğrafı
SDК3 ay önce

👍

don Buchanan profil fotoğrafı
don Buchanan3 ay önce

Cool

π profil fotoğrafı
π3 ay önce

Thank you; please expidite. I could build a missile myself in three years, and I only have $1200 to my name. I hope, by then, you have a whole factory. You have the formula; and international investment/interest. If Europe makes its own, great, but not great for us.

Sulah Randy profil fotoğrafı
Sulah Randy3 ay önce

Would like to see how it performs in the middle east against Iranian threats to the neighbouring countries.

oyleolduboyleoldu profil fotoğrafı
oyleolduboyleoldu3 ay önce

for the low low price of $2.5m of tax money.

#BarionBrownBeliever profil fotoğrafı
#BarionBrownBeliever3 ay önce

Thank you $SHLD

Peaceguy profil fotoğrafı
Peaceguy3 ay önce

and how does it deal with countermeasures included on new enemy missiles?... don't tell me, it's a secret 🤫

ain'tgotanickle profil fotoğrafı
ain'tgotanickle3 ay önce

A $4m missile, reduced to $2m still is $2m. A more realist cost is south of $500k.

Shawn Sviridov profil fotoğrafı
Shawn Sviridov3 ay önce

So why were the other pac missiles so much more expensive, how did you achieve savings?

Joseph galimi profil fotoğrafı
Joseph galimi3 ay önce

Can you make more than 10 a year?

BoldXIndustries profil fotoğrafı
BoldXIndustries3 ay önce

Interceptor math is a lower-tier math problem. You can fund the line, but the schedule lives in castings, connectors and tight-tolerance parts qualified to spec. We hold QPL hermetic connectors and flight-critical machining domestically. AS9100D, ITAR, Ohio.

Grokosklave profil fotoğrafı
Grokosklave3 ay önce

Ganz sicher nicht.

WarTime profil fotoğrafı
WarTime2 ay önce

Low‑cost and battle-tested air defense - today only the Russians have

Game Main profil fotoğrafı
Game Main3 ay önce

They're down to just the PAC 3 again, dang... NO ONE wants to be in that conference.

Benzer Videolar

🚨🇷🇺🚀 Russia is accelerating ballistic missile production as Ukraine faces a growing shortage of air defense interceptors. The widening imbalance threatens to increase pressure on Ukrainian cities in the months ahead. According to Ukrainian military intelligence, Russia is currently producing around 120 ballistic missiles per month, including Iskander-M and Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, in addition to 20-25 Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles. Moscow is also reportedly expanding its arsenal with KN-23 ballistic missiles supplied by North Korea. The assessment suggests that the Kremlin is increasingly betting on a strategy of attrition, seeking to intensify large-scale missile strikes while Ukraine waits for additional Western air defense interceptors, the development of its own anti-ballistic systems, and the serial production of domestically manufactured ballistic missiles. According to the report, many Ukrainian Patriot launchers are currently without interceptor missiles, with both PAC-2 and PAC-3 launch canisters reportedly standing empty. As a result, Russia’s growing ballistic missile arsenal is expected to remain one of the most serious threats to Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, as well as to the country’s critical infrastructure, in the coming months. The combination of rising Russian missile production and limited interceptor availability is shaping one of the most critical challenges for Ukraine’s air defense as the war enters a new phase of long-range strikes. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

17,630 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Russian report: Gulf air defenses face a “million-dollar missile vs. a drone costing a few thousand dollars” dilemma The Russian Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade published a study and analysis concluding that Gulf states’ reliance on long-range U.S. air defense systems against low-cost threats such as attack drones creates a significant gap between the cost of the attack and the cost of interception. The center noted that an Iranian Shahed-136 drone is estimated to cost around $20,000–$50,000 , while a PAC-3 interceptor missile can cost approximately $4 million , making the interception of large-scale drone attacks extremely expensive. The report argues that systems such as Patriot and THAAD were largely designed to counter long-range threats and ballistic missiles, while Gulf states need diversified defensive layers, including short- and medium-range systems to counter drones, cruise missiles, and low-altitude targets. The center proposed strengthening air defenses with Russian systems such as Buk-M3 “Viking” for medium-range defense, Tor for short-range defense, and Pantsir-S1M to protect critical infrastructure from close-range threats. According to the report, combining long-, medium-, and short-range systems could increase the number of engagement channels and reduce the depletion of costly interceptor missiles, particularly around oil refineries, desalination plants, ports, and energy facilities. The Russian center concludes that addressing the cost gap between offensive weapons and interceptors could make large-scale drone attacks less economically viable by building a layered defense system capable of countering threats at a more balanced cost.

RussiaNews 🇷🇺

13,364 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

‼️🇺🇲 Lockheed Martin has officially unveiled a game-changing addition to the global air defense arsenal, introducing the PAC-3 Adapted Capability Effector (ACE)—a highly advanced, ultra-affordable Patriot interceptor specifically designed to shatter the economics of modern aerial warfare. The revolutionary missile is engineered to complement existing Patriot frameworks while slashing production costs to less than half the price of the current $4 million PAC-3 MSE interceptor. Developed through a high-impact collaboration between U.S. and European defense industries, the PAC-3 ACE is a direct response to the grueling tactical lessons of the war in Ukraine, where the massive proliferation of cheap enemy drones and loitering munitions has demanded a far more cost-effective defensive solution. Lockheed Martin confirmed that development is moving at an aggressive pace, with full-scale production projected to hit the assembly lines within the next 36 months. This breakthrough represents a massive strategic pivot that destroys Russia's and Iran's strategy of trying to bankrupt Western air defense systems through mass-produced drone swarms. By delivering a lethal, high-tier interceptor at a fraction of the traditional cost, the alliance ensures that defenders can protect critical infrastructure without depleting multi-million-dollar missile stockpiles on low-cost targets. As production gears up, the PAC-3 ACE will provide Ukraine and its allies with an unsustainable cost curve for the enemy, cementing long-term dominance over contested skies and ensuring the democratic world can out-produce and out-last any adversarial threat. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

82,265 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

TRUMP UNVEILS GOLDEN DOME MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEM. President Donald Trump said he had selected a design for the $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense shield and named U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, to lead the ambitious program aimed at blocking threats from China and Russia. This is a Manhattan Project-scale mission, one that is both urgent and crucial to America’s security. Lockheed Martin is ready to partner with the best in industry, emerging, and large technology companies together to safeguard our nation. We lead the MDA’s National Team for C2BMC and successfully built the world’s most powerful missile defense software network, which connects forces around the world 24x7. This operationally proven, layered missile defense system allows commanders to make synchronized decisions about threats at any range, in any phase of flight, from any location in the world. From surface to space, Lockheed Martin is delivering combat-proven layered defense solutions so the U.S. and allies can stay ahead of accelerating threats. Our integrated air and missile defense systems provide the most advanced radars and sensors, command and control networks, satellites, targets, interceptors, and directed energy systems in the world. NGI is a first line of defense, tip-to-tail interceptor within the Missile Defense Agency’s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system. PAC-3 is a world leader in defense technology for air defense missile systems, delivering unmatched capability across multi-domain environments. SBIRS serves as a critical missile warning system, utilizing infrared surveillance for early missile detection. The Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) program is the backbone of the Missile Defense Agency’s layered defense strategy to protect the U.S. homeland from ballistic missile attacks. Sentinel A4 is a high-performance surveillance radar, replacing the legacy Sentinel A3, enhancing defense against cruise missiles, UAVs, and air threats. Aegis Combat System, the Navy’s most modern surface combat system, employs the SPY-1 radar for threat detection at sea. Experience the combat-proven THAAD, a top missile interceptor, protecting against ballistic threats with unmatched effectiveness. The F-35 is the most advanced node in a 21st Century Security network-centric architecture with the ability to securely connect high-tech platforms to share information across every domain. With a combination of all these advanced weapons, A.I., direct energy weapons (DEWs), and the finest aircraft and military in the world, let's just say this is like Skynet from Terminator movies on steroids. America will have the best country missle defense system in the world. Source: Lockheed Martin

The SCIF

21,781 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce