Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

INTRODUCING the all-new Cyprx Monthly Subscription! Link to join in comments & profile header 📈 Institutional DELTA zones #Crypto & #forex 📊 Early price analysis 🔎 weekly Zoom calls 💬 private chat, and 🔬 updated research 🚫 No commitment cancel any time Only 200 spots available! #XRP #HBAR #XLM

CDemanincor's profile picture

Cypress Demanincor

48,647 subscribers

16,822 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Finanzen#Crypto#forex
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Cyprx is one of the most comprehensive research communities available to retail. If you’re a crypto investor, active trader, or DeFi user, you’ll find a home here. Our Cyprx Research Lab Official team goes into the rabbit holes most people don’t even know exist. We’ve built one of the largest organized collections of documents, panel discussions, regulatory updates, and institutional publications in the entire space 💎 Non-mainstream research you won’t see on Twitter or YouTube 💎 Real-time macro & institutional market breakdowns 💎 Institutional-grade technical insights 💎4–6 private Zoom calls every week 💎Hundreds of educational documents 💎 The largest collection of esoteric, spiritual, and awakening resources This is what’s waiting for you inside Cyprx No hopium No surface level hype No recycled Twitter noise Just real education, real insight, and a community built for people ready to elevate financially, mentally, and spiritually. 👇🏼
3:29

Cyprx is one of the most comprehensive research communities available to retail. If you’re a crypto investor, active trader, or DeFi user, you’ll find a home here. Our Cyprx Research Lab Official team goes into the rabbit holes most people don’t even know exist. We’ve built one of the largest organized collections of documents, panel discussions, regulatory updates, and institutional publications in the entire space 💎 Non-mainstream research you won’t see on Twitter or YouTube 💎 Real-time macro & institutional market breakdowns 💎 Institutional-grade technical insights 💎4–6 private Zoom calls every week 💎Hundreds of educational documents 💎 The largest collection of esoteric, spiritual, and awakening resources This is what’s waiting for you inside Cyprx No hopium No surface level hype No recycled Twitter noise Just real education, real insight, and a community built for people ready to elevate financially, mentally, and spiritually. 👇🏼

Cypress Demanincor

57,064 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

THIS IS INSANE — AN ANTHROPIC ENGINEER BUILT A CLAUDE CODE BOT THAT READS INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS FLOW IN REAL TIME AND TURNED $200 INTO $14,300 TRADING ALONGSIDE THE BIGGEST ORDERS ON THE TAPE the bot doesn't predict. it stalks it reads thousands of institutional options orders streaming through SpotGamma — scores every block by size, direction, and how it historically moves price — then trades only when the heaviest hands on the tape are moving here's what's running on screen right now: → GEX Surface Analysis — 3D gamma exposure map rotating in real time, strike $8,168, GEX at 1.36B → MotiveWave footprint — ESU6 Range(20) with cumulative delta crashing to -9,500. every bid and ask printed at every level → SpotGamma Live Flow — institutional tape streaming tick by tick: SPX, QQQ, NVDA, AAPL, META, MSTR, NDX. strike, volume, premium — all live → GEXRadar — QQQ at $720.09, Hedging Pressure 53/100, Major Walls mapped, bullish flow → MNQU6 on mobile — Nasdaq 100 M1, bid 29,589 ask 29,591, TP set, P&L at +$109.50 when an institution drops $40K on SPX 7,740 calls or $28,639 on NDX puts — Claude sees it before FinTwit even screenshots it the bot makes only 10 trades per day not 50. not 100. ten. because Claude Code learned the edge isn't frequency — it's selectivity. large institutional block orders only and it exits early. before the institutions unwind. the same flow analysis that finds the entry also maps when large players historically take profit — the bot exits ahead of the crowd $200 in. $14,300 out. built by an engineer who used Claude Code to do what no dashboard can — read every institutional options order in real time and trade only when the biggest ones align you're watching one chart this bot is reading every block order on the tape to find the 10 setups that matter today save this — full setup breakdown below ↓
0:40

THIS IS INSANE — AN ANTHROPIC ENGINEER BUILT A CLAUDE CODE BOT THAT READS INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS FLOW IN REAL TIME AND TURNED $200 INTO $14,300 TRADING ALONGSIDE THE BIGGEST ORDERS ON THE TAPE the bot doesn't predict. it stalks it reads thousands of institutional options orders streaming through SpotGamma — scores every block by size, direction, and how it historically moves price — then trades only when the heaviest hands on the tape are moving here's what's running on screen right now: → GEX Surface Analysis — 3D gamma exposure map rotating in real time, strike $8,168, GEX at 1.36B → MotiveWave footprint — ESU6 Range(20) with cumulative delta crashing to -9,500. every bid and ask printed at every level → SpotGamma Live Flow — institutional tape streaming tick by tick: SPX, QQQ, NVDA, AAPL, META, MSTR, NDX. strike, volume, premium — all live → GEXRadar — QQQ at $720.09, Hedging Pressure 53/100, Major Walls mapped, bullish flow → MNQU6 on mobile — Nasdaq 100 M1, bid 29,589 ask 29,591, TP set, P&L at +$109.50 when an institution drops $40K on SPX 7,740 calls or $28,639 on NDX puts — Claude sees it before FinTwit even screenshots it the bot makes only 10 trades per day not 50. not 100. ten. because Claude Code learned the edge isn't frequency — it's selectivity. large institutional block orders only and it exits early. before the institutions unwind. the same flow analysis that finds the entry also maps when large players historically take profit — the bot exits ahead of the crowd $200 in. $14,300 out. built by an engineer who used Claude Code to do what no dashboard can — read every institutional options order in real time and trade only when the biggest ones align you're watching one chart this bot is reading every block order on the tape to find the 10 setups that matter today save this — full setup breakdown below ↓

INSIDER

127,572 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Introducing: GTM Elites The premium community for top 1% outbound & GTM operators. Over the last few months, I have been quietly building GTM Elites, what will be THE most valuable outbound/GTM community on the market in 2026. Here’s what the community will include: 1. Access to our end-to-end outbound / GTM / cold email course with over 100 modules covering: > How we setup Claude Code & practical + advanced ways we use it for outbound/GTM > 30+ Clay workflow breakdowns with workbook templates you can plug-n-play > Swipe file of 200+ top performing email scripts (can use as a context file for CC) > Step-by-step walkthrough of the campaign creation process that's driven 30,000+ positive responses for our clients > Full walkthrough to setup a top 0.1% cold email infrastructure > Dozens of masterclasses covering messaging, list building, and campaign creation > All recordings from past internal trainings, insider calls, and webinars Modules will be updated weekly over time to stay up to date with the latest shifts in GTM. 2. THREE weekly 1-hour group calls with myself, Shaw, and Lohit > Wednesday: GTM Strategy workshops with Shaw (head of GTM @ Pipeline tech) > Thursday: Claude Code & Clay sessions with Lohit (COO @ Pipeline tech) > Friday: Campaign & strategy review sessions with Christian (Founder @ Pipeline tech) Combined, our coaches have 11+ years of GTM experience, sent 10,000,000+ emails, generated 30,000+ leads, and $ 70M in pipeline. Our calls will be open floor Q&A style — so any questions you have, we’ll be there to answer no matter how niche or technical. 3. Daily GTM insight posts from myself or the coaches > New skills we’re building with Claude Code > New Clay workbook templates > Internal campaign insights on what's working right now > Real-time market shifts to be aware of > Early GTM tool finds 4. Personal DM access to myself and coaches > #/ask-the-experts channel, get questions answered in 24 hours > DM us individually and we’ll get back within 48 hours > Access on live calls for questions as well 5. Access to exclusive discounts to BEST in market software only available in GTM Elites > Ocean io > ScaledMail > EmailBison > Prospeo > Sending ac Any popular tools that the community wants to get discounts on, we’ll reach out to the providers for the community directly and secure us exclusive discounts. 6. Exclusive weekly workflow drops > Get access to new Claude code skills, Clay workbook templates, & n8n templates that we’re building and using for ourselves and clients in real time 7. Job/Hiring opportunities > Live GTM Job Board Monitoring > Job opportunities from others in the community > Looking to hire? Our community is going to have GTM professionals that are operating in the top 1% 8. Community with other top GTM operators > Meet other pros in the space, share alpha, or just make friends! > We’ll coordinate quarterly in-person meet ups (if you’re in the LA area, I’ll get you a coffee) 9. Exclusive guest appearances with top players > Monthly guest appearances with founders that are making waves in GTM --- If you’ve found value from my content, this premium group is on ANOTHER LEVEL of value, like 1,000X value. And you can get access to all of this for an ALL-TIME LOW pre-sale price for the next 72 hours ONLY. Once Monday hits, this pre-sale offer price is gone FOREVER. Want access to this one time pre-sale offer? 👉 Comment "ELITES" and I'll DM you the link for access.
3:36

Introducing: GTM Elites The premium community for top 1% outbound & GTM operators. Over the last few months, I have been quietly building GTM Elites, what will be THE most valuable outbound/GTM community on the market in 2026. Here’s what the community will include: 1. Access to our end-to-end outbound / GTM / cold email course with over 100 modules covering: > How we setup Claude Code & practical + advanced ways we use it for outbound/GTM > 30+ Clay workflow breakdowns with workbook templates you can plug-n-play > Swipe file of 200+ top performing email scripts (can use as a context file for CC) > Step-by-step walkthrough of the campaign creation process that's driven 30,000+ positive responses for our clients > Full walkthrough to setup a top 0.1% cold email infrastructure > Dozens of masterclasses covering messaging, list building, and campaign creation > All recordings from past internal trainings, insider calls, and webinars Modules will be updated weekly over time to stay up to date with the latest shifts in GTM. 2. THREE weekly 1-hour group calls with myself, Shaw, and Lohit > Wednesday: GTM Strategy workshops with Shaw (head of GTM @ Pipeline tech) > Thursday: Claude Code & Clay sessions with Lohit (COO @ Pipeline tech) > Friday: Campaign & strategy review sessions with Christian (Founder @ Pipeline tech) Combined, our coaches have 11+ years of GTM experience, sent 10,000,000+ emails, generated 30,000+ leads, and $ 70M in pipeline. Our calls will be open floor Q&A style — so any questions you have, we’ll be there to answer no matter how niche or technical. 3. Daily GTM insight posts from myself or the coaches > New skills we’re building with Claude Code > New Clay workbook templates > Internal campaign insights on what's working right now > Real-time market shifts to be aware of > Early GTM tool finds 4. Personal DM access to myself and coaches > #/ask-the-experts channel, get questions answered in 24 hours > DM us individually and we’ll get back within 48 hours > Access on live calls for questions as well 5. Access to exclusive discounts to BEST in market software only available in GTM Elites > Ocean io > ScaledMail > EmailBison > Prospeo > Sending ac Any popular tools that the community wants to get discounts on, we’ll reach out to the providers for the community directly and secure us exclusive discounts. 6. Exclusive weekly workflow drops > Get access to new Claude code skills, Clay workbook templates, & n8n templates that we’re building and using for ourselves and clients in real time 7. Job/Hiring opportunities > Live GTM Job Board Monitoring > Job opportunities from others in the community > Looking to hire? Our community is going to have GTM professionals that are operating in the top 1% 8. Community with other top GTM operators > Meet other pros in the space, share alpha, or just make friends! > We’ll coordinate quarterly in-person meet ups (if you’re in the LA area, I’ll get you a coffee) 9. Exclusive guest appearances with top players > Monthly guest appearances with founders that are making waves in GTM --- If you’ve found value from my content, this premium group is on ANOTHER LEVEL of value, like 1,000X value. And you can get access to all of this for an ALL-TIME LOW pre-sale price for the next 72 hours ONLY. Once Monday hits, this pre-sale offer price is gone FOREVER. Want access to this one time pre-sale offer? 👉 Comment "ELITES" and I'll DM you the link for access.

Christian

13,556 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🐶 THE CRYPTO $DOG GIVEAWAY 🐶 🦴 The Daily Bone | 1 SOL a Day | 365 SOL Giveaway OVER $30,000! 💸 📍 HOW IT WORKS - 365 SOL total - 1 SOL per day - 1 winner per day - Winners announced on X, daily. For the next 365 days, we’re giving away one SOL. Every single day. 🐕 HOW TO ENTER 1. Follow, Like ❤️ and repost 🔁 this post 2. Join the DOG X Community (link in profile/below) 3. Set your PFP to DOG meme 4. Make at least one quality post per day including $DOG 5. Join daily for a new chance to win. Multiple wins are possible. 👑 HOW WINNERS ARE CONSIDERED - Quality/originality of posts - Consistency/volume - Creative use of memes - Reach and engagement - Impact on our movement There are also more WEEKLY prizes to be won 👀 🤝 ELIGIBILITY NOTES - No brand-new, under 25 followers or bot accounts - Accounts should show genuine activity - This giveaway runs for a full year, so there’s plenty of time to build an account and participate properly - You can enter every day, and you have a chance to win more than once! 🔍 TRANSPARENCY - The 365 SOL are held in a dedicated multi-sig wallet - Giveaway wallet address: 8CH1nNNFrA9dnvaLiLMxF7FR6Wafxqao3kWx8mNnSM49 - All winners are announced publicly on X and will receive SOL upon announcement 🧠 WHY WE’RE DOING THIS - DOG is a community-run project built to last - $200k added to LP, ~50% locked - Project was CTO’d twice to remove bad actors - 100% community ownership, no dev control Our vision is to make this the Dog of Solana. This giveaway reflects that commitment. Good luck! 🐕
1:34

🐶 THE CRYPTO $DOG GIVEAWAY 🐶 🦴 The Daily Bone | 1 SOL a Day | 365 SOL Giveaway OVER $30,000! 💸 📍 HOW IT WORKS - 365 SOL total - 1 SOL per day - 1 winner per day - Winners announced on X, daily. For the next 365 days, we’re giving away one SOL. Every single day. 🐕 HOW TO ENTER 1. Follow, Like ❤️ and repost 🔁 this post 2. Join the DOG X Community (link in profile/below) 3. Set your PFP to DOG meme 4. Make at least one quality post per day including $DOG 5. Join daily for a new chance to win. Multiple wins are possible. 👑 HOW WINNERS ARE CONSIDERED - Quality/originality of posts - Consistency/volume - Creative use of memes - Reach and engagement - Impact on our movement There are also more WEEKLY prizes to be won 👀 🤝 ELIGIBILITY NOTES - No brand-new, under 25 followers or bot accounts - Accounts should show genuine activity - This giveaway runs for a full year, so there’s plenty of time to build an account and participate properly - You can enter every day, and you have a chance to win more than once! 🔍 TRANSPARENCY - The 365 SOL are held in a dedicated multi-sig wallet - Giveaway wallet address: 8CH1nNNFrA9dnvaLiLMxF7FR6Wafxqao3kWx8mNnSM49 - All winners are announced publicly on X and will receive SOL upon announcement 🧠 WHY WE’RE DOING THIS - DOG is a community-run project built to last - $200k added to LP, ~50% locked - Project was CTO’d twice to remove bad actors - 100% community ownership, no dev control Our vision is to make this the Dog of Solana. This giveaway reflects that commitment. Good luck! 🐕

The Crypto Dog Meme Official

76,307 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: “ETH TO $60K, BITCOIN TO $1M, AND STABLECOINS WILL FUND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT” He called Bitcoin at $25K in 2017 – and was laughed at. Fundstrat’s Tom Lee is one of the most followed macro minds in crypto, with deep ties to Wall Street, CNBC, and the largest players in finance. He says the new financial system is already being built – and crypto will anchor it. Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com isn’t guessing. He was JPMorgan’s Chief Equity Strategist. He’s advised global funds, predicted market cycles, and published one of the earliest institutional theses on Bitcoin in 2017. In this interview, we discuss Crypto’s future, explain why billions are flowing into Digital Asset Treasuries’, and how AI, sovereigns, and Wall Street will drive the next bull run The herd isn’t coming. The herd is here. 01:09 – Why Tom left JPMorgan to publish the Bitcoin thesis 03:45 – Bitcoin to $25K: clients canceled, Wall Street mocked 05:22 – The 4-year cycle: broken or reflexive? 08:48 – Will sovereign buyers put a floor under BTC? 12:11 – The new story arc: AI, institutions, and crypto convergence 14:00 – “Crypto is already UBI.” The forgotten benefit of early adoption 20:01 – How stablecoins will fund U.S. treasuries – permanently 23:47 – ETH’s underperformance and what changed in 2024 25:36 – Ethereum, AI agents & the rise of authenticated instructions 27:43 – “ETH has been dead for 5 years, but it’s not dead tech” 28:46 – ETH vs TON vs Tether: who wins the stablecoin war? 32:53 – Gaming, Pudgy Penguins, and crypto’s IP revolution 34:29 – What are Digital Asset Treasuries? Why they matter 37:10 – BitMNR: how ETH/share went from $4 to $23 in weeks 42:00 – Why BitMNR avoided convertibles – and outperformed 46:29 – ETH down, but ETH/share up – thanks to treasury velocity 53:48 – Price targets: BTC $200K, ETH $60K, and the path to $1M 55:15 – “ETH has a 50% chance of flipping Bitcoin” 56:24 – RWAs and tokenizing the real world – how we hit $100T 58:35 – “Crypto is democratized wealth. Anyone can join.” 59:02 – One chain to rule them all? Or multichain future? 01:00:45 – “Hard work is 2%. Luck is 98%.” 01:01:40 – Why crypto treasuries may become Wall Street’s new hedge This episode is sponsored by BTQ. BTQ is driving the future of post-quantum solutions, delivering a neutral-atom quantum computing platform and quantum-safe security. Backed by a broad patent portfolio and the first commercially significant quantum advantage, BTQ serves finance, telecom, logistics, and defense. (Cboe CA: BTQ | FSE: NG3 | OTCQX: BTQQF) Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the client and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions, especially in highly volatile markets like crypto.
1:01:44

🚨 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: “ETH TO $60K, BITCOIN TO $1M, AND STABLECOINS WILL FUND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT” He called Bitcoin at $25K in 2017 – and was laughed at. Fundstrat’s Tom Lee is one of the most followed macro minds in crypto, with deep ties to Wall Street, CNBC, and the largest players in finance. He says the new financial system is already being built – and crypto will anchor it. Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com isn’t guessing. He was JPMorgan’s Chief Equity Strategist. He’s advised global funds, predicted market cycles, and published one of the earliest institutional theses on Bitcoin in 2017. In this interview, we discuss Crypto’s future, explain why billions are flowing into Digital Asset Treasuries’, and how AI, sovereigns, and Wall Street will drive the next bull run The herd isn’t coming. The herd is here. 01:09 – Why Tom left JPMorgan to publish the Bitcoin thesis 03:45 – Bitcoin to $25K: clients canceled, Wall Street mocked 05:22 – The 4-year cycle: broken or reflexive? 08:48 – Will sovereign buyers put a floor under BTC? 12:11 – The new story arc: AI, institutions, and crypto convergence 14:00 – “Crypto is already UBI.” The forgotten benefit of early adoption 20:01 – How stablecoins will fund U.S. treasuries – permanently 23:47 – ETH’s underperformance and what changed in 2024 25:36 – Ethereum, AI agents & the rise of authenticated instructions 27:43 – “ETH has been dead for 5 years, but it’s not dead tech” 28:46 – ETH vs TON vs Tether: who wins the stablecoin war? 32:53 – Gaming, Pudgy Penguins, and crypto’s IP revolution 34:29 – What are Digital Asset Treasuries? Why they matter 37:10 – BitMNR: how ETH/share went from $4 to $23 in weeks 42:00 – Why BitMNR avoided convertibles – and outperformed 46:29 – ETH down, but ETH/share up – thanks to treasury velocity 53:48 – Price targets: BTC $200K, ETH $60K, and the path to $1M 55:15 – “ETH has a 50% chance of flipping Bitcoin” 56:24 – RWAs and tokenizing the real world – how we hit $100T 58:35 – “Crypto is democratized wealth. Anyone can join.” 59:02 – One chain to rule them all? Or multichain future? 01:00:45 – “Hard work is 2%. Luck is 98%.” 01:01:40 – Why crypto treasuries may become Wall Street’s new hedge This episode is sponsored by BTQ. BTQ is driving the future of post-quantum solutions, delivering a neutral-atom quantum computing platform and quantum-safe security. Backed by a broad patent portfolio and the first commercially significant quantum advantage, BTQ serves finance, telecom, logistics, and defense. (Cboe CA: BTQ | FSE: NG3 | OTCQX: BTQQF) Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the client and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions, especially in highly volatile markets like crypto.

Mario Nawfal

1,945,519 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🤖🔬 Can AI actually do science end-to-end? 🧠📈 And how would we know when it matches, or surpasses, humans? ⚡🧪 AI is rapidly automating scientific discovery, but benchmarking full-cycle discovery, from 💡 ideation → 🧑‍💻 execution → 📊 conclusions, remains unsolved: 🧐🧐🧐 ❌🛠️ Open-ended discovery → manual validation (costly, unscalable) ❌📏 Metric-driven benchmarks (e.g., MLE-Bench) → convenient but narrow (is higher accuracy really enough?) ❌🤖⚖️ LLM-as-judge → useful, but fundamentally risky if used alone 🔥🚀 Introducing FIRE-Bench🔥: Fullcycle Insight Rediscovery Evaluation 👉🌐 📚✨ A benchmark that turns fresh, human-verified insights from recent 🏆 NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers into masked, end-to-end discovery challenges 🧩 🌍🔐 Constrained open-ended discovery–backed by ground truth. 📌 Key takeaways: 1⃣ 📖🧱 Reference-based evaluation still matters: constrained LLM judging helps, but human-grounded references remain essential until agents can consistently match human conclusions 2⃣ 🏆🧠 Expert-validated ground truth: all tasks come from recent NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers, with contamination carefully controlled 3⃣ 🔁🎭 Rediscovery, not reproduction: original 🧪 methods, 📊 experiments, 💻 implementations, and 📈 analyses are fully masked to create real discovery challenges 🔑 Key empirical findings: 💡 The "Science Gap" is Real: Even the best setup (Claude Code + Sonnet-4) caps out at an F1 score of 46.7. On hard tasks, agents struggle to break 30 💡 Success is a "Lottery": Performance has incredibly high variance. Reliability is a major unsolved issue. 💡 Coding is no longer the bottleneck; high-level reasoning and analysis are: ~74% of errors stem from flawed planning, not coding ⚙️ How it works: 🔹 Research-Problem Trees: We parse papers into trees (from broad roots to concrete leaves). This allows us to select intermediate nodes that perfectly balance open-ended exploration with verifiable ground truth. 🔹 Claim-Level Evaluation: We match AI conclusions against human conclusions using granular claim decomposition (F1 score). 🔹 Creativity Check: We score false positives to see if agents are finding novel truths (Spoiler🚨: they aren’t creative yet). 🔹 New Diagnostic Taxonomy: failures traced across four stages: 🧠 Planning → 🛠️ Implementation → ▶️ Execution → 🧾 Conclusion 🔹 Additional Analyses: cost efficiency, contamination checks, and more. 👀 The Future: 🚀 Live-FIRE-Bench: a live, continuously updated FIRE-Bench to track real-time progress on the latest research (Newest LLMs should be benchmarked with the newest research) 🚀 Stronger scaffolding (search + planning + coding) 🧠🧰 and converting FIRE-Bench into interactive environments for training research agents 🚀 Toward real creativity: We want better systems that can produce genuinely novel conclusions toward creativity 🎨⏳ 🚀 Better systems 🧠✨ and better benchmarks 📏 must co-evolve 🔄 over time 📜🎥 Paper, video, demo, and research trees: 👉🌐 #AI 🤖 #MachineLearning 📚 #AI4Science 🔬 #LLMs 🧠 #Research 🧪 #AgenticAI 🚀 #FireBench 🔥
0:42

🤖🔬 Can AI actually do science end-to-end? 🧠📈 And how would we know when it matches, or surpasses, humans? ⚡🧪 AI is rapidly automating scientific discovery, but benchmarking full-cycle discovery, from 💡 ideation → 🧑‍💻 execution → 📊 conclusions, remains unsolved: 🧐🧐🧐 ❌🛠️ Open-ended discovery → manual validation (costly, unscalable) ❌📏 Metric-driven benchmarks (e.g., MLE-Bench) → convenient but narrow (is higher accuracy really enough?) ❌🤖⚖️ LLM-as-judge → useful, but fundamentally risky if used alone 🔥🚀 Introducing FIRE-Bench🔥: Fullcycle Insight Rediscovery Evaluation 👉🌐 📚✨ A benchmark that turns fresh, human-verified insights from recent 🏆 NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers into masked, end-to-end discovery challenges 🧩 🌍🔐 Constrained open-ended discovery–backed by ground truth. 📌 Key takeaways: 1⃣ 📖🧱 Reference-based evaluation still matters: constrained LLM judging helps, but human-grounded references remain essential until agents can consistently match human conclusions 2⃣ 🏆🧠 Expert-validated ground truth: all tasks come from recent NeurIPS / ICLR / ICML papers, with contamination carefully controlled 3⃣ 🔁🎭 Rediscovery, not reproduction: original 🧪 methods, 📊 experiments, 💻 implementations, and 📈 analyses are fully masked to create real discovery challenges 🔑 Key empirical findings: 💡 The "Science Gap" is Real: Even the best setup (Claude Code + Sonnet-4) caps out at an F1 score of 46.7. On hard tasks, agents struggle to break 30 💡 Success is a "Lottery": Performance has incredibly high variance. Reliability is a major unsolved issue. 💡 Coding is no longer the bottleneck; high-level reasoning and analysis are: ~74% of errors stem from flawed planning, not coding ⚙️ How it works: 🔹 Research-Problem Trees: We parse papers into trees (from broad roots to concrete leaves). This allows us to select intermediate nodes that perfectly balance open-ended exploration with verifiable ground truth. 🔹 Claim-Level Evaluation: We match AI conclusions against human conclusions using granular claim decomposition (F1 score). 🔹 Creativity Check: We score false positives to see if agents are finding novel truths (Spoiler🚨: they aren’t creative yet). 🔹 New Diagnostic Taxonomy: failures traced across four stages: 🧠 Planning → 🛠️ Implementation → ▶️ Execution → 🧾 Conclusion 🔹 Additional Analyses: cost efficiency, contamination checks, and more. 👀 The Future: 🚀 Live-FIRE-Bench: a live, continuously updated FIRE-Bench to track real-time progress on the latest research (Newest LLMs should be benchmarked with the newest research) 🚀 Stronger scaffolding (search + planning + coding) 🧠🧰 and converting FIRE-Bench into interactive environments for training research agents 🚀 Toward real creativity: We want better systems that can produce genuinely novel conclusions toward creativity 🎨⏳ 🚀 Better systems 🧠✨ and better benchmarks 📏 must co-evolve 🔄 over time 📜🎥 Paper, video, demo, and research trees: 👉🌐 #AI 🤖 #MachineLearning 📚 #AI4Science 🔬 #LLMs 🧠 #Research 🧪 #AgenticAI 🚀 #FireBench 🔥

Zhen Wang

18,110 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The Laws That Could Break the Banking System: GENIUS & CLARITY Acts — Banks War Against Stablecoins The banking Cartel is officially going DEFCON 1. 🚨 They are losing the digital arms race, and they’ve spent millions on lobbyists to build a wall around your financial sovereignty. The CLARITY Act is the battleground. Here is what they don't want you to know. 🧵👇 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► ⭐⭐ Easiest hardware wallet, portable style!! ✔️ Simply tap to your phone and you’re in! ✔️ Low cost, must-have! Access all crypto! ⚡💰 *Get 30% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ 💥💳 *Tangem Pay ► NEW!! Visa card powered by your Tangem Wallet! ⚡💰 *Early access* — join the waitlist NOW! ✔️ Top up with stablecoins, spend instantly! 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► ⭐⭐ AI-Driven Trading Bot + DCA Tool! ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! ✔️ Simply connect your Coinbase and go “default”! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* … *Start now!: ⭐ ➜ 🚀 … Weekly Webinar!: ⭐ 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► ⭐⭐ Game-changing web3 financial platform! ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, stake, store! ✔️ 100%+ reserved, fully backed, deep liquidity! ✔️ Up to 4.50% USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) ⚡💰 Limited-Time: *Trade $100, get $20 FREE!!* … *Sign up now! ⭐ ➜* 💥👽 *Uphold Debit Card ► NEW!! Visa card powered by your Uphold account! ⚡💰 Up to *6% XRP* on everything you buy! ✔️ Metal card option! Just top up and spend! ▬▬▬ “BANKS ARE PANICKING” 🚨 NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM UNDERWAY 💥 Hello, fam! Crypto Casey here 👋 and I'm on a mission to improve people’s lives through #crypto education. The global financial system is entering a historic turning point as stablecoins, decentralized finance, and new legislation threaten the traditional banking model built on fractional reserves and hidden fees. In this video we break down the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY Act, why banks are going DEFCON 1 to stop them, and how blockchain technology may ultimately reshape the future of money and financial sovereignty... Let’s hit it! ▬▬▬ TOP CRYPTO TOOLS TO GET TODAY! 💥💥⚡ 🔥💳 *Black Friday! ► 💳 *Tangem Card ► 💥 *Tangem Pay ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► 💥👽 *Uphold Debit Card ► 🚀 *Money Line Indicator ► ▬▬▬ SET UP YOUR TRADING BOT TODAY!! 💥💥🚀 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► Automated AI-Driven Trading Bot + DCA Tool! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! BUY NOW! ► FULL REVIEW! ► *WEEKLY WEBINAR!* ► CONNECT BOT TO YOUR TRADING ACCOUNT! ⭐ 🧿 Coinbase ► ⭐ 🐙 Kraken Pro ► ▬▬▬ CHAPTERS 💬 00:00 - Traditional Banking Scam 02:25 - 3 Steps to Escape 03:34 - GENIUS Act 05:50 - CLARITY Act 07:30 - Banks Lobbying Washington 08:45 - How Banks Make Profit 11:05 - Big Win for DeFi 11:05 - Cyber Warfare Threat 13:05 - Paradigm Shift 14:35 - Become Financially Sovereign 15:50 - Build Wealth with AI ▬▬▬ FOLLOW MY ONLY OFFICIAL CHANNELS! 📢 🔥 Linktree (Deals) ► ⭐ TikTok ► ⭐ Twitter ► ⭐ Instagram ► ⭐ Rumble ► ⭐ Facebook ► ⭐ Newsletter Sign-up ► ▬▬▬ TAGS: #Bitcoin #Crypto #Stablecoins #BankingSystem #FinancialSovereignty #DeFi #DecentralizedFinance #GENIUSAct #CLARITYAct #CryptoRegulation #CryptoNews #FinancialFreedom #Blockchain #CryptoCasey #CentralBanks #BankingCartel #DigitalFinance #FutureOfMoney #CryptoAdoption #CryptoRevolution TOPICS: Bitcoin, crypto, stablecoins, decentralized finance, DeFi, banking system, fractional reserve banking, financial sovereignty, GENIUS Act, CLARITY Act, crypto regulation, banking cartel, stablecoin regulation, blockchain finance, future of money, crypto news, financial freedom, central banks, crypto adoption, digital finance, crypto Casey, next generation finance NOTE: This description contains affiliate links. If you purchase a product through one of them, I will receive a commission (at no additional cost to you). Thanks for supporting the channel! DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and not to be construed as financial, legal or tax advice. The content of this video is solely the opinions of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. The speaker does not guarantee any particular outcome. © 2025 Crypto Casey. All rights reserved ▬▬▬ ❤️ Be safe out there. —Crypto Casey
16:46

The Laws That Could Break the Banking System: GENIUS & CLARITY Acts — Banks War Against Stablecoins The banking Cartel is officially going DEFCON 1. 🚨 They are losing the digital arms race, and they’ve spent millions on lobbyists to build a wall around your financial sovereignty. The CLARITY Act is the battleground. Here is what they don't want you to know. 🧵👇 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► ⭐⭐ Easiest hardware wallet, portable style!! ✔️ Simply tap to your phone and you’re in! ✔️ Low cost, must-have! Access all crypto! ⚡💰 *Get 30% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ 💥💳 *Tangem Pay ► NEW!! Visa card powered by your Tangem Wallet! ⚡💰 *Early access* — join the waitlist NOW! ✔️ Top up with stablecoins, spend instantly! 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► ⭐⭐ AI-Driven Trading Bot + DCA Tool! ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! ✔️ Simply connect your Coinbase and go “default”! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* … *Start now!: ⭐ ➜ 🚀 … Weekly Webinar!: ⭐ 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► ⭐⭐ Game-changing web3 financial platform! ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, stake, store! ✔️ 100%+ reserved, fully backed, deep liquidity! ✔️ Up to 4.50% USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) ⚡💰 Limited-Time: *Trade $100, get $20 FREE!!* … *Sign up now! ⭐ ➜* 💥👽 *Uphold Debit Card ► NEW!! Visa card powered by your Uphold account! ⚡💰 Up to *6% XRP* on everything you buy! ✔️ Metal card option! Just top up and spend! ▬▬▬ “BANKS ARE PANICKING” 🚨 NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM UNDERWAY 💥 Hello, fam! Crypto Casey here 👋 and I'm on a mission to improve people’s lives through #crypto education. The global financial system is entering a historic turning point as stablecoins, decentralized finance, and new legislation threaten the traditional banking model built on fractional reserves and hidden fees. In this video we break down the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY Act, why banks are going DEFCON 1 to stop them, and how blockchain technology may ultimately reshape the future of money and financial sovereignty... Let’s hit it! ▬▬▬ TOP CRYPTO TOOLS TO GET TODAY! 💥💥⚡ 🔥💳 *Black Friday! ► 💳 *Tangem Card ► 💥 *Tangem Pay ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► 💥👽 *Uphold Debit Card ► 🚀 *Money Line Indicator ► ▬▬▬ SET UP YOUR TRADING BOT TODAY!! 💥💥🚀 🤖 *GoBabyTrade ► Automated AI-Driven Trading Bot + DCA Tool! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! BUY NOW! ► FULL REVIEW! ► *WEEKLY WEBINAR!* ► CONNECT BOT TO YOUR TRADING ACCOUNT! ⭐ 🧿 Coinbase ► ⭐ 🐙 Kraken Pro ► ▬▬▬ CHAPTERS 💬 00:00 - Traditional Banking Scam 02:25 - 3 Steps to Escape 03:34 - GENIUS Act 05:50 - CLARITY Act 07:30 - Banks Lobbying Washington 08:45 - How Banks Make Profit 11:05 - Big Win for DeFi 11:05 - Cyber Warfare Threat 13:05 - Paradigm Shift 14:35 - Become Financially Sovereign 15:50 - Build Wealth with AI ▬▬▬ FOLLOW MY ONLY OFFICIAL CHANNELS! 📢 🔥 Linktree (Deals) ► ⭐ TikTok ► ⭐ Twitter ► ⭐ Instagram ► ⭐ Rumble ► ⭐ Facebook ► ⭐ Newsletter Sign-up ► ▬▬▬ TAGS: #Bitcoin #Crypto #Stablecoins #BankingSystem #FinancialSovereignty #DeFi #DecentralizedFinance #GENIUSAct #CLARITYAct #CryptoRegulation #CryptoNews #FinancialFreedom #Blockchain #CryptoCasey #CentralBanks #BankingCartel #DigitalFinance #FutureOfMoney #CryptoAdoption #CryptoRevolution TOPICS: Bitcoin, crypto, stablecoins, decentralized finance, DeFi, banking system, fractional reserve banking, financial sovereignty, GENIUS Act, CLARITY Act, crypto regulation, banking cartel, stablecoin regulation, blockchain finance, future of money, crypto news, financial freedom, central banks, crypto adoption, digital finance, crypto Casey, next generation finance NOTE: This description contains affiliate links. If you purchase a product through one of them, I will receive a commission (at no additional cost to you). Thanks for supporting the channel! DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and not to be construed as financial, legal or tax advice. The content of this video is solely the opinions of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. The speaker does not guarantee any particular outcome. © 2025 Crypto Casey. All rights reserved ▬▬▬ ❤️ Be safe out there. —Crypto Casey

Crypto Casey

28,295 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Bitcoin to End Wars? 🚨 Federal Reserve to Start World War III? 🌍 (Private Central Banks & Warfare 🌐) 🤖 *Robotic Crypto Trader ► ⭐⭐ AI-Driven Trading Bot! (GoBabyTrade!!) ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! ✔️ Simply connect your Coinbase and start “default”! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* … *Start now!: ⭐ ➜ 🚀 … Weekly Webinar!: ⭐ 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► ⭐⭐ Game-changing web3 financial platform! ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, store, manage! ✔️ Fully reserved, radically transparent, proof online! ✔️ Connected to 30+ providers, deep liquidity! ⚡💰 *Up to 4.65%* on USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) … *Sign up now! ⭐ ➜* 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► ⭐⭐ Easiest hardware wallet, portable style!! ✔️ Simply tap to your phone and you’re in! ✔️ Low cost, must-have! Access all crypto! ⚡💰 *Get 5% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY5 … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ 🔐 *Ledger Wallets ► ⭐⭐ NEW!! Ledger Stax & Flex On Sale NOW!! ✔️ Highest security, secure touch screen! ✔️ Full ecosystem, 1000's of coins/tokens! ✔️ Advanced management of your assets! ⚡🎁 Holiday Special: *Up to $70 in FREE BTC!!* … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ ▬▬▬▬▬ “PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS FUND WARS!” 😡 TO ENSLAVE THE WORLD 🌏 Hello, fam! Crypto Casey here 👋 and I'm on a mission to improve people’s lives through #crypto education. In this video, we explore how private central banks have been enslaving the world for centuries, highlighting the importance of bitcoin. ▬▬▬▬▬ TOP CRYPTO TOOLS TO GET TODAY! 💥💥⚡ ⭐👽 *Uphold⁺ ► Game-changing web3 financial platform! Rivals banks! ⚡💰 *Up to 4.65%* on USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, store, manage! 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► Easiest hardware wallets! Fully portable! ⚡💰 *Get 5% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY5 ✔️ Simply tap and you're in! Sleek, stylish! ⚡🔐 *Ledger Wallets ► NEW!! Ledger Stax & Flex On Sale NOW!! ⚡🎁 Holiday Special: *Up to $70 in FREE BTC!!* ✔️ Highest security, secure touch screen! ▬▬▬▬▬ SET UP YOUR TRADING BOT TODAY!! 💥💥🚀 🤖 *Robotic Crypto Trader ► Automated AI-Driven Trading Bot! (GoBabyTrade!!) ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! BUY NOW! ► FULL REVIEW! ► *WEEKLY WEBINAR!* ► CONNECT BOT TO YOUR TRADING ACCOUNT! ⭐ 🧿 Coinbase ► ⭐ 🐙 Kraken Pro ► ▬▬▬▬▬ CHAPTERS 💬 (Watch to the end!) 00:00 - Another World War? 02:40 - Currency Act 04:50 - Ignorance of Coin & Credit 06:25 - History Repeating 07:31 - First Bank of United States 08:00 - War of 1812 08:40 - Second Bank of United States 10:13 - Civil War & Assassinations 12:40 - Third Bank of United States 13:25 - Next Generation of Banking 14:35 - Federal Reserve 16:20 - World War I 17:35 - World War II 18:40 - John F Kennedy 19:40 - Off Gold Standard 22:10 - World War III 24:15 - Transfer Crypto to Wallet ▬▬▬▬▬ FOLLOW MY ONLY OFFICIAL CHANNELS! 📢 ⭐ Linktree (Deals) ► ⭐ TikTok ► ⭐ Twitter ► ⭐ Instagram ► ⭐ Podcast ► ⭐ Facebook ► ▬▬▬▬▬ TAGS: #cryptocurrency #bitcoin #cryptocasey NOTE: This description contains affiliate links. If you purchase a product through one of them, I will receive a commission (at no additional cost to you). Thanks for supporting the channel! ⁺UPHOLD DISCLAIMER: Terms Apply. Capital at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Balances $1,000 or more earn 4.65% APY; under $1,000 earn 2% APY. Rates subject to change. Cash deposited in the USD Interest Account solely for the purpose of accessing the Cash Sweep Program is not protected by SIPC or FDIC; you are able to have up to $2,500,000 FDIC insurance when your cash is swept into the program banks. See Atomic Cash Sweep Terms & Conditions and full details and disclosures. DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and not to be construed as financial, legal or tax advice. The content of this video is solely the opinions of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. The speaker does not guarantee any particular outcome. © 2024 Crypto Casey. All rights reserved ▬▬▬▬▬ ❤️ Be safe out there. —Crypto Casey
25:24

Bitcoin to End Wars? 🚨 Federal Reserve to Start World War III? 🌍 (Private Central Banks & Warfare 🌐) 🤖 *Robotic Crypto Trader ► ⭐⭐ AI-Driven Trading Bot! (GoBabyTrade!!) ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! ✔️ Simply connect your Coinbase and start “default”! ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* … *Start now!: ⭐ ➜ 🚀 … Weekly Webinar!: ⭐ 👽 *Uphold⁺ ► ⭐⭐ Game-changing web3 financial platform! ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, store, manage! ✔️ Fully reserved, radically transparent, proof online! ✔️ Connected to 30+ providers, deep liquidity! ⚡💰 *Up to 4.65%* on USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) … *Sign up now! ⭐ ➜* 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► ⭐⭐ Easiest hardware wallet, portable style!! ✔️ Simply tap to your phone and you’re in! ✔️ Low cost, must-have! Access all crypto! ⚡💰 *Get 5% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY5 … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ 🔐 *Ledger Wallets ► ⭐⭐ NEW!! Ledger Stax & Flex On Sale NOW!! ✔️ Highest security, secure touch screen! ✔️ Full ecosystem, 1000's of coins/tokens! ✔️ Advanced management of your assets! ⚡🎁 Holiday Special: *Up to $70 in FREE BTC!!* … *Order now!: ⭐ ➜ ▬▬▬▬▬ “PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS FUND WARS!” 😡 TO ENSLAVE THE WORLD 🌏 Hello, fam! Crypto Casey here 👋 and I'm on a mission to improve people’s lives through #crypto education. In this video, we explore how private central banks have been enslaving the world for centuries, highlighting the importance of bitcoin. ▬▬▬▬▬ TOP CRYPTO TOOLS TO GET TODAY! 💥💥⚡ ⭐👽 *Uphold⁺ ► Game-changing web3 financial platform! Rivals banks! ⚡💰 *Up to 4.65%* on USD balances! (FDIC Insured!) ✔️ #1 All-In-One: buy, sell, trade, store, manage! 💳 *Tangem Card ► ⭕ *Tangem Ring ► Easiest hardware wallets! Fully portable! ⚡💰 *Get 5% off!!* Promo Code: CRYPTOCASEY5 ✔️ Simply tap and you're in! Sleek, stylish! ⚡🔐 *Ledger Wallets ► NEW!! Ledger Stax & Flex On Sale NOW!! ⚡🎁 Holiday Special: *Up to $70 in FREE BTC!!* ✔️ Highest security, secure touch screen! ▬▬▬▬▬ SET UP YOUR TRADING BOT TODAY!! 💥💥🚀 🤖 *Robotic Crypto Trader ► Automated AI-Driven Trading Bot! (GoBabyTrade!!) ⚡💰 Exclusive limited-time offer: *Get $1,000 off!!* ✔️ Profits while you sleep! 24/7 crypto trading! BUY NOW! ► FULL REVIEW! ► *WEEKLY WEBINAR!* ► CONNECT BOT TO YOUR TRADING ACCOUNT! ⭐ 🧿 Coinbase ► ⭐ 🐙 Kraken Pro ► ▬▬▬▬▬ CHAPTERS 💬 (Watch to the end!) 00:00 - Another World War? 02:40 - Currency Act 04:50 - Ignorance of Coin & Credit 06:25 - History Repeating 07:31 - First Bank of United States 08:00 - War of 1812 08:40 - Second Bank of United States 10:13 - Civil War & Assassinations 12:40 - Third Bank of United States 13:25 - Next Generation of Banking 14:35 - Federal Reserve 16:20 - World War I 17:35 - World War II 18:40 - John F Kennedy 19:40 - Off Gold Standard 22:10 - World War III 24:15 - Transfer Crypto to Wallet ▬▬▬▬▬ FOLLOW MY ONLY OFFICIAL CHANNELS! 📢 ⭐ Linktree (Deals) ► ⭐ TikTok ► ⭐ Twitter ► ⭐ Instagram ► ⭐ Podcast ► ⭐ Facebook ► ▬▬▬▬▬ TAGS: #cryptocurrency #bitcoin #cryptocasey NOTE: This description contains affiliate links. If you purchase a product through one of them, I will receive a commission (at no additional cost to you). Thanks for supporting the channel! ⁺UPHOLD DISCLAIMER: Terms Apply. Capital at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Balances $1,000 or more earn 4.65% APY; under $1,000 earn 2% APY. Rates subject to change. Cash deposited in the USD Interest Account solely for the purpose of accessing the Cash Sweep Program is not protected by SIPC or FDIC; you are able to have up to $2,500,000 FDIC insurance when your cash is swept into the program banks. See Atomic Cash Sweep Terms & Conditions and full details and disclosures. DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and not to be construed as financial, legal or tax advice. The content of this video is solely the opinions of the speaker who is not a licensed financial advisor or registered investment advisor. Trading cryptocurrencies poses considerable risk of loss. The speaker does not guarantee any particular outcome. © 2024 Crypto Casey. All rights reserved ▬▬▬▬▬ ❤️ Be safe out there. —Crypto Casey

Crypto Casey

32,927 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.
0:24

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.

X Finance Bull

16,025 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

WATCH ME BUILD AN AI BUSINESS FROM SCRATCH (EPISODE 1) I'm building an AI services business from scratch, on camera, with 4 rules: -100% cold outreach -No audience -No network -60 minutes a day max The scoreboard is how many days it takes a total stranger to pay me $500. Here's the entire model: 1) The niche is tree services in Charlotte. High ticket, no private equity, and after-hours emergencies where the first person to answer wins the job. 2) The offer: a built and hosted website, an AI-powered speed-to-quote form, and a Google Business Profile cleanup. $500 flat. 3) The website IS the lead magnet. We build it first, give it away free, and charge $500 to install and host it. 4) Five agents inside Hyperagent run everything. Prospector, Opener, Sitesmith, Fulfiller, and an Account Manager upsell. 5) The Prospector dispatched 8 subagents, scraped 494 businesses, and verified 98 real leads. Done in 30 minutes. 6) The competition is a joke. The first five "websites" on my list: a blank page, a 404, two dead links, and a redirect to a crypto gaming site. 7) First-touch texts: under 160 characters, no links, no emojis, no mention of AI. "Hey, do y'all still do tree removal in Charlotte? Found you on Google. Corey." 8) The agent wrote "y'all" on its own. Sounding like a neighbor, not a company, is the whole reply-rate game. 9) 60 minutes a day covers 25-50 outreach attempts. Outreach is the only work that actually makes money. 10) All 5 agents get given away free in episode 4, plus $1,000 in free Hyperagent credits at the link in the YouTube subscription. Enough to run my entire lead scrape 6 times over. Two things that I'm looking to accomplish here: 1) Strip away every advantage and prove the model still works. If it works with no audience and one hour a day, nobody has an excuse left. 2) Give away the finished deliverable, not a pitch. An owner looking at their own new website doesn't need convincing. Full breakdown below. (also available on the Build With AI podcast)
43:54

WATCH ME BUILD AN AI BUSINESS FROM SCRATCH (EPISODE 1) I'm building an AI services business from scratch, on camera, with 4 rules: -100% cold outreach -No audience -No network -60 minutes a day max The scoreboard is how many days it takes a total stranger to pay me $500. Here's the entire model: 1) The niche is tree services in Charlotte. High ticket, no private equity, and after-hours emergencies where the first person to answer wins the job. 2) The offer: a built and hosted website, an AI-powered speed-to-quote form, and a Google Business Profile cleanup. $500 flat. 3) The website IS the lead magnet. We build it first, give it away free, and charge $500 to install and host it. 4) Five agents inside Hyperagent run everything. Prospector, Opener, Sitesmith, Fulfiller, and an Account Manager upsell. 5) The Prospector dispatched 8 subagents, scraped 494 businesses, and verified 98 real leads. Done in 30 minutes. 6) The competition is a joke. The first five "websites" on my list: a blank page, a 404, two dead links, and a redirect to a crypto gaming site. 7) First-touch texts: under 160 characters, no links, no emojis, no mention of AI. "Hey, do y'all still do tree removal in Charlotte? Found you on Google. Corey." 8) The agent wrote "y'all" on its own. Sounding like a neighbor, not a company, is the whole reply-rate game. 9) 60 minutes a day covers 25-50 outreach attempts. Outreach is the only work that actually makes money. 10) All 5 agents get given away free in episode 4, plus $1,000 in free Hyperagent credits at the link in the YouTube subscription. Enough to run my entire lead scrape 6 times over. Two things that I'm looking to accomplish here: 1) Strip away every advantage and prove the model still works. If it works with no audience and one hour a day, nobody has an excuse left. 2) Give away the finished deliverable, not a pitch. An owner looking at their own new website doesn't need convincing. Full breakdown below. (also available on the Build With AI podcast)

Corey Ganim

39,767 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

HERMES AGENT + STRIPE PAYMENTS + NVIDIA NEMOTRON. YOUR AGENT CAN NOW RUN A BUSINESS. ACCEPT PAYMENTS. PAY FOR SERVICES. PROVISION ITS OWN INFRASTRUCTURE. ALL INSIDE A SECURITY SANDBOX. two years ago the question was: can an AI agent run a business autonomously? the answer shipped this week. Hermes already handles workflows: cron jobs, sub-agents, kanban orchestration, multi-profile pipelines, scheduled research. what it couldn't do: spend money and prove it's safe. Stripe solved the first problem. Nvidia solved the second. WHAT AUTONOMOUS BUSINESS OPERATIONS LOOK LIKE: → customer sends a request via email → agent reads, scopes the project, estimates cost → provisions the infrastructure it needs (pays via Stripe, you approve on your phone) → builds and deploys the deliverable → sends the result to the customer → creates a payment link via Stripe (Stripe API integration, separate from Link CLI) → tops off its own API credits when balance drops → reports daily costs and progress to your Telegram → all within security policies you set once you set the rules. the agent runs the operation. you review revenue reports. not tasks. this is already happening. Dark Factory: autonomous software factory. send an idea before bed. wake up to a deployed URL. live entry in the Hermes Accelerated Business Hackathon. HOW STRIPE MAKES THE AGENT FINANCIALLY AUTONOMOUS: Stripe Link CLI gives your agent a scoped wallet. not your credit card. one-time-use virtual cards. → agent finds a product or service it needs → creates a spend request via Stripe Link → you get a notification on your phone (Link app) → you review: merchant, amount, context → one tap to approve or reject → agent receives a one-time virtual card → completes the purchase → card expires after single use your real card details never enter agent context. never printed in chat. never exposed to the merchant. Hermes cannot self-approve. you confirm every spend. install: hermes install skills/optional/payments/stripe-link-cli link-cli auth login what the agent can pay for: → API credits (Nous Portal, OpenRouter) → SaaS subscriptions it needs for operations → domain names, hosting, cloud credits → products from any online store currently US only. HOW NVIDIA MAKES THE AGENT SAFE TO TRUST: an agent with spending authority and no security boundaries is a liability. NemoClaw solves this. three layers: 1. OPENSHELL (sandbox) kernel-level isolation. controls network, filesystem, syscalls. default deny. you whitelist what's allowed. agent tries to reach a blocked domain = rejected. agent has no idea it's sandboxed. 2. NEMOTRON (private models) open-weight models on your own hardware. Nemotron 3 Super 120B MoE (48GB+ VRAM). Nemotron 3 Nano 4B (8GB VRAM, edge). fully private. no data leaves your machine. without GPU: inference routes to cloud via Privacy Router. 3. PRIVACY ROUTER (automatic split) decides per query: local or cloud. private data → local Nemotron. general web research → Claude, GPT, Gemini. automatic. per query. no manual routing. install: export NEMOCLAW_AGENT=hermes curl -fsSL https:// www.nvidia. com/nemoclaw.sh | bash requires Docker. NemoClaw is alpha software. APIs may change. test in non-production first. THE FULL PICTURE: before this stack: → agent could work but couldn't pay for anything → agent could pay but couldn't be trusted → agent could be trusted but couldn't operate 24/7 now: → Hermes runs the business logic (workflows, memory, skills, cron, sub-agents) → Stripe runs the financial layer (Link CLI for spending, Stripe API for receiving) → NemoClaw runs the trust layer (sandbox, policies, private routing) → VPS keeps everything always on → Telegram keeps you in the loop TYPES OF BUSINESSES THIS ENABLES: → autonomous software factory (customer request → build → deploy → payment link) → content agency (brief → research → draft → deliver → bill) → lead generation service (scrape → qualify → outreach → book calls) → SaaS monitoring and maintenance (detect issues → fix → deploy → report) → e-commerce operations (inventory → pricing → fulfillment → support) each one: Hermes profiles handle the workflows. Stripe handles the payments (in and out). NemoClaw handles the security. you handle the strategy. THE HACKATHON: Hermes Agent Accelerated Business Hackathon with Nvidia and Stripe. cash prizes + Stripe credits + Nvidia DGX Spark. ends June 30. the goal: build agents that earn, spend, and run real operations autonomously. link in the Nous Research Discord. full Hermes architecture deep-dive in the article 👇
53:28

HERMES AGENT + STRIPE PAYMENTS + NVIDIA NEMOTRON. YOUR AGENT CAN NOW RUN A BUSINESS. ACCEPT PAYMENTS. PAY FOR SERVICES. PROVISION ITS OWN INFRASTRUCTURE. ALL INSIDE A SECURITY SANDBOX. two years ago the question was: can an AI agent run a business autonomously? the answer shipped this week. Hermes already handles workflows: cron jobs, sub-agents, kanban orchestration, multi-profile pipelines, scheduled research. what it couldn't do: spend money and prove it's safe. Stripe solved the first problem. Nvidia solved the second. WHAT AUTONOMOUS BUSINESS OPERATIONS LOOK LIKE: → customer sends a request via email → agent reads, scopes the project, estimates cost → provisions the infrastructure it needs (pays via Stripe, you approve on your phone) → builds and deploys the deliverable → sends the result to the customer → creates a payment link via Stripe (Stripe API integration, separate from Link CLI) → tops off its own API credits when balance drops → reports daily costs and progress to your Telegram → all within security policies you set once you set the rules. the agent runs the operation. you review revenue reports. not tasks. this is already happening. Dark Factory: autonomous software factory. send an idea before bed. wake up to a deployed URL. live entry in the Hermes Accelerated Business Hackathon. HOW STRIPE MAKES THE AGENT FINANCIALLY AUTONOMOUS: Stripe Link CLI gives your agent a scoped wallet. not your credit card. one-time-use virtual cards. → agent finds a product or service it needs → creates a spend request via Stripe Link → you get a notification on your phone (Link app) → you review: merchant, amount, context → one tap to approve or reject → agent receives a one-time virtual card → completes the purchase → card expires after single use your real card details never enter agent context. never printed in chat. never exposed to the merchant. Hermes cannot self-approve. you confirm every spend. install: hermes install skills/optional/payments/stripe-link-cli link-cli auth login what the agent can pay for: → API credits (Nous Portal, OpenRouter) → SaaS subscriptions it needs for operations → domain names, hosting, cloud credits → products from any online store currently US only. HOW NVIDIA MAKES THE AGENT SAFE TO TRUST: an agent with spending authority and no security boundaries is a liability. NemoClaw solves this. three layers: 1. OPENSHELL (sandbox) kernel-level isolation. controls network, filesystem, syscalls. default deny. you whitelist what's allowed. agent tries to reach a blocked domain = rejected. agent has no idea it's sandboxed. 2. NEMOTRON (private models) open-weight models on your own hardware. Nemotron 3 Super 120B MoE (48GB+ VRAM). Nemotron 3 Nano 4B (8GB VRAM, edge). fully private. no data leaves your machine. without GPU: inference routes to cloud via Privacy Router. 3. PRIVACY ROUTER (automatic split) decides per query: local or cloud. private data → local Nemotron. general web research → Claude, GPT, Gemini. automatic. per query. no manual routing. install: export NEMOCLAW_AGENT=hermes curl -fsSL https:// www.nvidia. com/nemoclaw.sh | bash requires Docker. NemoClaw is alpha software. APIs may change. test in non-production first. THE FULL PICTURE: before this stack: → agent could work but couldn't pay for anything → agent could pay but couldn't be trusted → agent could be trusted but couldn't operate 24/7 now: → Hermes runs the business logic (workflows, memory, skills, cron, sub-agents) → Stripe runs the financial layer (Link CLI for spending, Stripe API for receiving) → NemoClaw runs the trust layer (sandbox, policies, private routing) → VPS keeps everything always on → Telegram keeps you in the loop TYPES OF BUSINESSES THIS ENABLES: → autonomous software factory (customer request → build → deploy → payment link) → content agency (brief → research → draft → deliver → bill) → lead generation service (scrape → qualify → outreach → book calls) → SaaS monitoring and maintenance (detect issues → fix → deploy → report) → e-commerce operations (inventory → pricing → fulfillment → support) each one: Hermes profiles handle the workflows. Stripe handles the payments (in and out). NemoClaw handles the security. you handle the strategy. THE HACKATHON: Hermes Agent Accelerated Business Hackathon with Nvidia and Stripe. cash prizes + Stripe credits + Nvidia DGX Spark. ends June 30. the goal: build agents that earn, spend, and run real operations autonomously. link in the Nous Research Discord. full Hermes architecture deep-dive in the article 👇

YanXbt

37,709 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EBS Protocol. Imminent. This will ensure everyone is safely placed in their home, able to witness the historical moment that reveals all truths, cover ups etc. through the E B S which is imminent. * There must be a test and then a review of all occurrences and activities. The possible implications on a National and Global level can be quite complicated so things must be in alignment to the protocols. Yes there are many consequences if things aren’t done with precision and perfection. This is the practice run before the real one folks to see responses and accuracy to what is forthcoming which changes humanity. We hear the schedule is now finally firm, but again I’m just the messenger. Be ready to adjust if needed in regards to possible time changes. Only select few know the moment of exact, precise timing of events. For security and other obvious reasons, must be properly kept private. * The E B S is going to air playing an 8 hour video. It will be replaying 3 times a day for 10 days Communication Darkness. During those 10 Days of Communication Darkness the following things will happen. We will receive 7 “Trumpets “ aka E B S text messages on our phones alerting us to tune into our TV at this time. Our phones will only work for 911 and we are informed the Signal App, which is military encrypted will be available. * Our internet will not work during that time. Our ATM’s will not work. After the 10 days of Communication Darkness, we will connect to a new quantum internet. People are urged to stock up on at least three weeks of food and water. Be prepared with food, water, toilet paper, generators etc. for this great awakening reveal. We are promised the new Star-link Internet System by the end of the month. As we speak the teams coordinating this important historic event are revamping the E.B.S to ensure the utmost security for all involved so remain patient as things get finalized. They want to make certain there are not any interferences of any sort at all. Those making the plan want no one to panic whatsoever because it’s simply the release of the truth. After the E B S and we’ve gone through the 10 days mainstream media blackout and sat through all the 24/7, (eight hours long movies), do we go back to normal like business as usual? Answer is: After E B S and the 8 hours long 24 7, movies all will change. The, life support, attached to the old and evil systems will be pulled. Humanity, and planet Earth simultaneously move to quantum reality consciousness system (Peace and Prosperity). End of Financial and Human consciousness enslavement. Old systems of Government, Education , Finance, Health, Trade and Commerce etc., will all be dismantled and replaced. We will have new currency called the USN US NOTE and gold backed. The time is now to alert as many who will listen. Do not have too much pride. Go warn those you love even though they think you’re crazy. Your goal for others is truly to help absorb the shock of what is coming. Stay updated on these events at 17PLUS with Daily Intel, Truth and Information. A Truth Aggregate site built to connect you with The Plan and Real News!
1:04

EBS Protocol. Imminent. This will ensure everyone is safely placed in their home, able to witness the historical moment that reveals all truths, cover ups etc. through the E B S which is imminent. * There must be a test and then a review of all occurrences and activities. The possible implications on a National and Global level can be quite complicated so things must be in alignment to the protocols. Yes there are many consequences if things aren’t done with precision and perfection. This is the practice run before the real one folks to see responses and accuracy to what is forthcoming which changes humanity. We hear the schedule is now finally firm, but again I’m just the messenger. Be ready to adjust if needed in regards to possible time changes. Only select few know the moment of exact, precise timing of events. For security and other obvious reasons, must be properly kept private. * The E B S is going to air playing an 8 hour video. It will be replaying 3 times a day for 10 days Communication Darkness. During those 10 Days of Communication Darkness the following things will happen. We will receive 7 “Trumpets “ aka E B S text messages on our phones alerting us to tune into our TV at this time. Our phones will only work for 911 and we are informed the Signal App, which is military encrypted will be available. * Our internet will not work during that time. Our ATM’s will not work. After the 10 days of Communication Darkness, we will connect to a new quantum internet. People are urged to stock up on at least three weeks of food and water. Be prepared with food, water, toilet paper, generators etc. for this great awakening reveal. We are promised the new Star-link Internet System by the end of the month. As we speak the teams coordinating this important historic event are revamping the E.B.S to ensure the utmost security for all involved so remain patient as things get finalized. They want to make certain there are not any interferences of any sort at all. Those making the plan want no one to panic whatsoever because it’s simply the release of the truth. After the E B S and we’ve gone through the 10 days mainstream media blackout and sat through all the 24/7, (eight hours long movies), do we go back to normal like business as usual? Answer is: After E B S and the 8 hours long 24 7, movies all will change. The, life support, attached to the old and evil systems will be pulled. Humanity, and planet Earth simultaneously move to quantum reality consciousness system (Peace and Prosperity). End of Financial and Human consciousness enslavement. Old systems of Government, Education , Finance, Health, Trade and Commerce etc., will all be dismantled and replaced. We will have new currency called the USN US NOTE and gold backed. The time is now to alert as many who will listen. Do not have too much pride. Go warn those you love even though they think you’re crazy. Your goal for others is truly to help absorb the shock of what is coming. Stay updated on these events at 17PLUS with Daily Intel, Truth and Information. A Truth Aggregate site built to connect you with The Plan and Real News!

MR. Q-17

35,759 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sharing My Journey Trading Memecoins on Solana (1 Year 4 Months In) I’ll also be doing a giveaway 0.5 SOL each to 3 lucky winners ( 48 hours ). The rules are simple: Repost and Share your trading experience on Solana (memecoins or utility coins) and tell me your biggest profit and biggest loss in the comment below. Alright, now it’s time for us to get back to the story. I wanna share my personal experience trading memecoins (and some utility plays) on Solana over the past 1 year and 4 months. Before that, I was pretty active on Ethereum since around 2020. So what made me switch to Solana ? It started when someone from my private group pointed out the potential of Solana, the speed, the low fees, and how early the ecosystem still felt at the time. Funny thing is, I actually heard about Solana when it was already at $80, but I didn’t really touch it until it hit around $100, and I started with 20 SOL as capital. It was sometime around February 2024 (don’t remember the exact date), when I first tried trading memecoins on Solana. Back then, wasn’t even popping yet, most devs were still launching manually. No fancy bots, no real token scanners, just pure risk. ( Correct me if I’m wrong about when first launched. ) Honestly, in the beginning, it was tough. New tokens popping up every second, rugs left and right, Solana was in hype mode, and everyone wanted to launch something. But by April, things started to click. I was finally making profits trading Solana coins, memecoins, lowcap utilities, all that. If I compare it to now, I’d say it was way easier back then to catch early entries. Not even exaggerating, 100x plays were way more common. I will put sneak peek of some of my PnL from my personal channel, Of course, it’s not as simple anymore with today’s market; Bundles everywhere, token farming systems, launch metas changing fast… Back then? It was cleaner. Simpler. Honestly, better. Through all this, I’ve always had one dream: To help people who are truly serious about learning the game. That’s why I started Bollish Research , a place for real ones to learn and grow in this space. From the very beginning of Bollish Academy until now, we’ve built the Bollish Research team through real work and honestly, quite a few people have been cut along the way. The older I get, the more I realize the value of staying low key… of building a tight circle and only letting the right people in. You can be open, honest, and real, but still know that not everyone deserves a seat at your table. I’ve come to realize this right now, all I want is to grind hard, make a lot of money, and make the people who’ve stood by me from day one proud. The ones who were there when I was nothing, all the way to who I am now. I wanna help people in need too, using the profits from my trading, because I’ve never had any intention of launching paid classes or any of that bullshit. So if you’re reading this, listen. Most of the time there is no support system, it's just you and your grind. So believe in yourself. Motivate yourself. Celebrate your small wins. Pray to God that you will make it. Don’t lose hope. Stay focused. Stay consistent. Be disciplined. If you wanna see my PnL, you can check it out below or you can join my Journey Channel ( ) Thanks for reading. I love you all
0:20

Sharing My Journey Trading Memecoins on Solana (1 Year 4 Months In) I’ll also be doing a giveaway 0.5 SOL each to 3 lucky winners ( 48 hours ). The rules are simple: Repost and Share your trading experience on Solana (memecoins or utility coins) and tell me your biggest profit and biggest loss in the comment below. Alright, now it’s time for us to get back to the story. I wanna share my personal experience trading memecoins (and some utility plays) on Solana over the past 1 year and 4 months. Before that, I was pretty active on Ethereum since around 2020. So what made me switch to Solana ? It started when someone from my private group pointed out the potential of Solana, the speed, the low fees, and how early the ecosystem still felt at the time. Funny thing is, I actually heard about Solana when it was already at $80, but I didn’t really touch it until it hit around $100, and I started with 20 SOL as capital. It was sometime around February 2024 (don’t remember the exact date), when I first tried trading memecoins on Solana. Back then, wasn’t even popping yet, most devs were still launching manually. No fancy bots, no real token scanners, just pure risk. ( Correct me if I’m wrong about when first launched. ) Honestly, in the beginning, it was tough. New tokens popping up every second, rugs left and right, Solana was in hype mode, and everyone wanted to launch something. But by April, things started to click. I was finally making profits trading Solana coins, memecoins, lowcap utilities, all that. If I compare it to now, I’d say it was way easier back then to catch early entries. Not even exaggerating, 100x plays were way more common. I will put sneak peek of some of my PnL from my personal channel, Of course, it’s not as simple anymore with today’s market; Bundles everywhere, token farming systems, launch metas changing fast… Back then? It was cleaner. Simpler. Honestly, better. Through all this, I’ve always had one dream: To help people who are truly serious about learning the game. That’s why I started Bollish Research , a place for real ones to learn and grow in this space. From the very beginning of Bollish Academy until now, we’ve built the Bollish Research team through real work and honestly, quite a few people have been cut along the way. The older I get, the more I realize the value of staying low key… of building a tight circle and only letting the right people in. You can be open, honest, and real, but still know that not everyone deserves a seat at your table. I’ve come to realize this right now, all I want is to grind hard, make a lot of money, and make the people who’ve stood by me from day one proud. The ones who were there when I was nothing, all the way to who I am now. I wanna help people in need too, using the profits from my trading, because I’ve never had any intention of launching paid classes or any of that bullshit. So if you’re reading this, listen. Most of the time there is no support system, it's just you and your grind. So believe in yourself. Motivate yourself. Celebrate your small wins. Pray to God that you will make it. Don’t lose hope. Stay focused. Stay consistent. Be disciplined. If you wanna see my PnL, you can check it out below or you can join my Journey Channel ( ) Thanks for reading. I love you all

Bollish

58,581 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It’s taken nearly a full year of my life - First $LMND, soon everything else. I’ve finally launched IronicApe - not another data provider but what will become (overtime) the world’s leading digital analyst, 100x cheaper and 100x faster. I built it around a simple belief: data is only useful when you understand the context, the source, the business and why the number matters. It brings together narrated earnings updates, company “stories”, operating performance, ownership, fundamentals, market sentiment, technical analysis, valuation, SEC filings, source checks, point-in-time backtesting, community research and Cortex - our map of the drivers and dependencies behind a business… a business is not GAAP accounting, everything connects to everything else and every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction. The walk-forward Machine learning model moves through history one reporting period at a time, using only information available at that point (blind) - It forecasts, compares the result with what actually happened and learns which signals deserve more weight - without quietly learning from the future. It tests possible causal relationships; it doesn’t pretend correlation is proof. I’ve tried my best to make everything understandable for retail investors while retaining enough technical depth, granular analysis and transparent evidence to be useful to leading analysts, all financial data is deterministically retrieved and source backed. Portfolio management (that’s actually useful), a company screener and a much more comprehensive Learning Academy are coming soon… IronicApe is meant for all investors no matter their age, background, education or experience - longer term it will help take a first time investor from understanding the terminology most with years of experience just know, what is revenue or gross margin all the way to complex MBA level knowledge and beyond. For now, please go forth and try it. Find every bug, missing feature, confusing explanation, bad assumption and change you think it needs. Honest feedback is very welcome! If you read this far, fair play! There’s also 10 hidden Paper Bag Investor hidden around the app. I had Ai place them, even I don’t know where they all are, I’ve only managed to find 5 so far! 😅 Together, we can overtime level the playing field with Wall street and democratise financial analysis. I turned down a 7 figure investment to build this for the retail community. It’s not perfect, nothing is - but my commitment to you all is to never stop pushing the boundary of what’s possible.. to iterative, innovate and strive to win together!! And while it’s not perfect, I can tell you this for free… it’s a fu*k load better than Book value per share!!! 🍋 It has real cost to maintain - I’m not yet eligible to monetise from X and I really DON’T want to charge for this. So if you find value in it, please like, share and follow. I also appreciate I post a lot of stuff that people may not want to follow to get access, so I’ll be adding a non follower paid subscription and free ad’s plan soon. For now, when you link your X account it checks follower status to unlock content, it uses the least access x provides to check follower status - I don’t even get your email. Apes Stronger Together!
12:59

It’s taken nearly a full year of my life - First $LMND, soon everything else. I’ve finally launched IronicApe - not another data provider but what will become (overtime) the world’s leading digital analyst, 100x cheaper and 100x faster. I built it around a simple belief: data is only useful when you understand the context, the source, the business and why the number matters. It brings together narrated earnings updates, company “stories”, operating performance, ownership, fundamentals, market sentiment, technical analysis, valuation, SEC filings, source checks, point-in-time backtesting, community research and Cortex - our map of the drivers and dependencies behind a business… a business is not GAAP accounting, everything connects to everything else and every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction. The walk-forward Machine learning model moves through history one reporting period at a time, using only information available at that point (blind) - It forecasts, compares the result with what actually happened and learns which signals deserve more weight - without quietly learning from the future. It tests possible causal relationships; it doesn’t pretend correlation is proof. I’ve tried my best to make everything understandable for retail investors while retaining enough technical depth, granular analysis and transparent evidence to be useful to leading analysts, all financial data is deterministically retrieved and source backed. Portfolio management (that’s actually useful), a company screener and a much more comprehensive Learning Academy are coming soon… IronicApe is meant for all investors no matter their age, background, education or experience - longer term it will help take a first time investor from understanding the terminology most with years of experience just know, what is revenue or gross margin all the way to complex MBA level knowledge and beyond. For now, please go forth and try it. Find every bug, missing feature, confusing explanation, bad assumption and change you think it needs. Honest feedback is very welcome! If you read this far, fair play! There’s also 10 hidden Paper Bag Investor hidden around the app. I had Ai place them, even I don’t know where they all are, I’ve only managed to find 5 so far! 😅 Together, we can overtime level the playing field with Wall street and democratise financial analysis. I turned down a 7 figure investment to build this for the retail community. It’s not perfect, nothing is - but my commitment to you all is to never stop pushing the boundary of what’s possible.. to iterative, innovate and strive to win together!! And while it’s not perfect, I can tell you this for free… it’s a fu*k load better than Book value per share!!! 🍋 It has real cost to maintain - I’m not yet eligible to monetise from X and I really DON’T want to charge for this. So if you find value in it, please like, share and follow. I also appreciate I post a lot of stuff that people may not want to follow to get access, so I’ll be adding a non follower paid subscription and free ad’s plan soon. For now, when you link your X account it checks follower status to unlock content, it uses the least access x provides to check follower status - I don’t even get your email. Apes Stronger Together!

Ironic Ape

29,813 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🟢GIVEAWAY🟢 Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50💎 (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence I’ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal “player lost money” complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of “forwarded to the relevant department.” This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was “testing the website for George,” while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for “proof about your testing job.” The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed support’s instructions. Edward replied that he had “forwarded” the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18–19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was “in continuous evolution.” On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: “A few withdrawals require manual approval,” then added, “Our withdrawals are typically instant but…” That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 → 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 → 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 → 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 → 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 → 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not “instant withdrawal.” And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID → Tequity/provider player ID → session/currency context → seed pair → server seed hash → revealed server seed → client seed → nonce/cursor → raw outcome → final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and “contact VIP” is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: “I don’t have the answers to your questions right now, but I’m forwarding your request to the relevant department.” That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: “I will forward this to the relevant department.” So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17–02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31–13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48–03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20–06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11–01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51–22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19–20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were “working on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,” and then said the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were “legitimate and eligible accounts.” That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: “There has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.” Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: “i dont play 3$ in unoriginals,” “i played all 3M in unoriginals,” and “ive never play slots.” I asked what “Card” was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it “doesn’t make us look good.” That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had “abusers” on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, “even these abusers,” then called me “begging for money.” That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard “abusers.” If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: “1M wagered and 0.2$.” Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21–24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21–24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: “Weekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,” and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, “Sorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.” I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: “Do you have any other concerns?” They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: “Our tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.” So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on “up overall” as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used “up overall” to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: “Your request has been relayed to the relevant department.” Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as “so you want $100,000?” and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to “abusers,” told me I was “up overall,” said “You are begging for money,” and suggested I “just do this to casinos.” Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that player’s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as “abusers,” contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was “up overall” and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 → 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21–24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, “not eligible” is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind “the provider” whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2
22:49

🟢GIVEAWAY🟢 Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50💎 (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence I’ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal “player lost money” complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of “forwarded to the relevant department.” This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was “testing the website for George,” while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for “proof about your testing job.” The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed support’s instructions. Edward replied that he had “forwarded” the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18–19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was “in continuous evolution.” On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: “A few withdrawals require manual approval,” then added, “Our withdrawals are typically instant but…” That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 → 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 → 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 → 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 → 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 → 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not “instant withdrawal.” And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID → Tequity/provider player ID → session/currency context → seed pair → server seed hash → revealed server seed → client seed → nonce/cursor → raw outcome → final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and “contact VIP” is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: “I don’t have the answers to your questions right now, but I’m forwarding your request to the relevant department.” That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: “I will forward this to the relevant department.” So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17–02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31–13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48–03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20–06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11–01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51–22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19–20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were “working on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,” and then said the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were “legitimate and eligible accounts.” That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: “There has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.” Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: “i dont play 3$ in unoriginals,” “i played all 3M in unoriginals,” and “ive never play slots.” I asked what “Card” was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it “doesn’t make us look good.” That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had “abusers” on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, “even these abusers,” then called me “begging for money.” That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard “abusers.” If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: “1M wagered and 0.2$.” Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21–24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21–24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: “Weekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,” and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, “Sorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.” I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: “Do you have any other concerns?” They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: “Our tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.” So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on “up overall” as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used “up overall” to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: “Your request has been relayed to the relevant department.” Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as “so you want $100,000?” and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to “abusers,” told me I was “up overall,” said “You are begging for money,” and suggested I “just do this to casinos.” Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that player’s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as “abusers,” contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was “up overall” and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 → 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21–24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, “not eligible” is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind “the provider” whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2

Dr. W

20,491 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today I'm proud to announce that I've officially become an Aptos Advisor! Let's go back in time... I had my initial comeup years back through Facebook advertising, chasing a dream that required me to leave everything behind in France where I was studying at uni but learning nothing that wasn't already obvious to me. Doing whatever it takes - I washed windows and worked the night shift at a plastic factory to fund my first business arbitraging consumer goods across the world from my grandparents attic when I was 18. I remember hitting a plateau. Some days in the green, some days in the red - learning a lot but it wasn't enough to leave the nest. I got in touch with 2 guys who would alter the trajectory and change my life forever so much its hard to quantify, even now. I sent a cold Instagram DM to one of them at 3 in the morning, expecting no reply. I poured my heart out, explaining my current situation, problems, and solutions i've tried to no avail. However I was met with him giving me his personal phone number, the one only his wife and kids had. I wasn't asking them to "put me on", but they did anyways. To an extent, they saw themselves in me, becoming mentors. My parents confused, at an instant I moved to Puerto Rico, where they ran their global operations from at a huge scale unlike anyone else at the time, and I became the youngest person under act 20/22 on the island. I later reverse image searched their tax attorney, showing up to the office in San Juan. I remember when I first entered the door, he looked around me to see if my parents were coming behind me, since I was so young. These mentors of mine would show me the ropes of how to really scale any product or SKU to 9 figures and beyond. Not just consumer goods, but software and subscription models - they had the Midas Touch with just an AMEX and a dream, going band for band with ANY Fortune500 Facebook marketing spend with much larger teams. It was unreal seeing their backend, filming ads in their home, and getting introduced to heavy hitters and some of the biggest web2 influencers like Logan Paul, which later would be convinced to become neighbors on the island, moving to Puerto Rico before the Floyd Mayweather Jr. fight expecting a huge capital gains event. Fast forward a few years. I got into crypto starting in 2017, but really 2023. I remember hearing stories of my mentors being super early into ETH, fullporting with size in 2015, and telling me during the advertising era to "never fade Facebook", which stuck with me all these years - leading me to Aptos, being the premier ex-libra/diem team with a clear focus on money movement. The first time I sent stablecoins on Aptos it was just so obvious, this product is just better by a mile than anything else, reminiscent of the early days "Pre-meta" of Facebook advertising which created an infinite money generator with the right creative. It only became obvious to others years later, becoming a crowded trade. Aptos is early but not without problems, if we're being honest. The engineering is truly next level and unmatched, which the market is fading for now, but will soon be unignorable with my help going forward. With my advisory position, I look to do a few things exceptionally well: - Combine both of my worlds together, introducing my Facebook mentors (which are now leading WLFI) to the leadership of Aptos, such as avery.apt 🇺🇸 strengthening the relationship by working on [REDACTED] in the coming months. - Guerilla marketing campaigns to gain net new buyers of APT effectively, running enormous retail traffic to Aptos that sustainably converts new users over time at scale. - Fully realize the Aptos CTO (Community Takeover), or activist investing for you oldheads out there. Imagine what happens when the largest Facebook advertisers join hands with the best Facebook developers. This partnership is only just beginning. Chase Herro ... Zak Folkman ... It's time to run it back... Aptos looking good here.
0:45

Today I'm proud to announce that I've officially become an Aptos Advisor! Let's go back in time... I had my initial comeup years back through Facebook advertising, chasing a dream that required me to leave everything behind in France where I was studying at uni but learning nothing that wasn't already obvious to me. Doing whatever it takes - I washed windows and worked the night shift at a plastic factory to fund my first business arbitraging consumer goods across the world from my grandparents attic when I was 18. I remember hitting a plateau. Some days in the green, some days in the red - learning a lot but it wasn't enough to leave the nest. I got in touch with 2 guys who would alter the trajectory and change my life forever so much its hard to quantify, even now. I sent a cold Instagram DM to one of them at 3 in the morning, expecting no reply. I poured my heart out, explaining my current situation, problems, and solutions i've tried to no avail. However I was met with him giving me his personal phone number, the one only his wife and kids had. I wasn't asking them to "put me on", but they did anyways. To an extent, they saw themselves in me, becoming mentors. My parents confused, at an instant I moved to Puerto Rico, where they ran their global operations from at a huge scale unlike anyone else at the time, and I became the youngest person under act 20/22 on the island. I later reverse image searched their tax attorney, showing up to the office in San Juan. I remember when I first entered the door, he looked around me to see if my parents were coming behind me, since I was so young. These mentors of mine would show me the ropes of how to really scale any product or SKU to 9 figures and beyond. Not just consumer goods, but software and subscription models - they had the Midas Touch with just an AMEX and a dream, going band for band with ANY Fortune500 Facebook marketing spend with much larger teams. It was unreal seeing their backend, filming ads in their home, and getting introduced to heavy hitters and some of the biggest web2 influencers like Logan Paul, which later would be convinced to become neighbors on the island, moving to Puerto Rico before the Floyd Mayweather Jr. fight expecting a huge capital gains event. Fast forward a few years. I got into crypto starting in 2017, but really 2023. I remember hearing stories of my mentors being super early into ETH, fullporting with size in 2015, and telling me during the advertising era to "never fade Facebook", which stuck with me all these years - leading me to Aptos, being the premier ex-libra/diem team with a clear focus on money movement. The first time I sent stablecoins on Aptos it was just so obvious, this product is just better by a mile than anything else, reminiscent of the early days "Pre-meta" of Facebook advertising which created an infinite money generator with the right creative. It only became obvious to others years later, becoming a crowded trade. Aptos is early but not without problems, if we're being honest. The engineering is truly next level and unmatched, which the market is fading for now, but will soon be unignorable with my help going forward. With my advisory position, I look to do a few things exceptionally well: - Combine both of my worlds together, introducing my Facebook mentors (which are now leading WLFI) to the leadership of Aptos, such as avery.apt 🇺🇸 strengthening the relationship by working on [REDACTED] in the coming months. - Guerilla marketing campaigns to gain net new buyers of APT effectively, running enormous retail traffic to Aptos that sustainably converts new users over time at scale. - Fully realize the Aptos CTO (Community Takeover), or activist investing for you oldheads out there. Imagine what happens when the largest Facebook advertisers join hands with the best Facebook developers. This partnership is only just beginning. Chase Herro ... Zak Folkman ... It's time to run it back... Aptos looking good here.

🐝 (🌐/acc)

256,182 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Padawans! We are excited to announce the return of Jediswap with concentrated liquidity, full audits, points, and incentives. Check it out at Since our last update two months ago, we have been working hard on a fresh new version of Jediswap, focused on bringing capital efficiency and the best price execution to our users. After two months of dedicated efforts, a full audit by Nethermind Starknet , and passing rigorous security tests, we are excited to announce the launch of Jediswap v2. Jediswap v2 significantly enhances user experience and performance while introducing new features and surprises. Our commitment to community and user growth remains strong, and we have exciting plans to expand the Jediswap ecosystem. Take a look at key updates coming with the launch. A points system that empowers genuine, loyal users: Jediswap's origins go back to early 2020 when we started our journey not as a product but as a community known as the Mesh community. Our mission was clear: bring Open Finance to billions of people. Recognising the strength of community-driven efforts, we understood that collective belief and collaboration, rather than individual or corporate endeavours, would be the most effective path forward. Early loyal users are the most crucial pillars of any community and product. This point system is Jediswap’s first step in recognising and rewarding the value each user has added to the protocol. We have prepared separate point systems for liquidity providers and traders. In short, as an LP, you can maximise your points by earning more fees on your LP positions and maintaining your liquidity in Jediswap over the long term. You can check out the complete math behind points here. For traders, use Jediswap when you genuinely need to swap tokens. There is no need to do any wash trading. We have published the points system for Jediswap v2 and will soon release points for all the activity that has occurred on Jediswap v1 to date with a boost. Check out the points logic on our docs: Improved performance and user experience: We have significantly enhanced Jediswap's performance, making it faster and more user-friendly. One notable improvement is the integration of pool analytics directly within the Pool page, eliminating the need for users to navigate to a separate analytics page. Additionally, balance fetching has been optimised for smoother operation. Any liquidity added to pools now updates the My Positions page in real-time. Battle-tested security For this launch, we implemented several security measures. We underwent a rigorous 7-week audit process with Nethermind. With the help of the Nethermind team, we also created a test framework for Jediswap to compare security against Uniswap v3, which has been operational for 3+ years and is one of the most battle-tested smart contracts available. We simulated real data from different Uniswap v3 pools on Jediswap. We achieved a 100% match in the contract state after each on-chain action, such as swaps and liquidity adjustments, bolstering our confidence in our code's security. We will announce many cool things over the next few weeks. Keep an out JediSwap ;) Mint a Galxe NFT: To commemorate this launch, we have published a new campaign on Galxe, which rewards users with an NFT for being an early user of Jediswap v2. To earn the Galxe NFT, add at least $25 worth of liquidity to one of the pools listed in the Galxe quest.
0:22

Padawans! We are excited to announce the return of Jediswap with concentrated liquidity, full audits, points, and incentives. Check it out at Since our last update two months ago, we have been working hard on a fresh new version of Jediswap, focused on bringing capital efficiency and the best price execution to our users. After two months of dedicated efforts, a full audit by Nethermind Starknet , and passing rigorous security tests, we are excited to announce the launch of Jediswap v2. Jediswap v2 significantly enhances user experience and performance while introducing new features and surprises. Our commitment to community and user growth remains strong, and we have exciting plans to expand the Jediswap ecosystem. Take a look at key updates coming with the launch. A points system that empowers genuine, loyal users: Jediswap's origins go back to early 2020 when we started our journey not as a product but as a community known as the Mesh community. Our mission was clear: bring Open Finance to billions of people. Recognising the strength of community-driven efforts, we understood that collective belief and collaboration, rather than individual or corporate endeavours, would be the most effective path forward. Early loyal users are the most crucial pillars of any community and product. This point system is Jediswap’s first step in recognising and rewarding the value each user has added to the protocol. We have prepared separate point systems for liquidity providers and traders. In short, as an LP, you can maximise your points by earning more fees on your LP positions and maintaining your liquidity in Jediswap over the long term. You can check out the complete math behind points here. For traders, use Jediswap when you genuinely need to swap tokens. There is no need to do any wash trading. We have published the points system for Jediswap v2 and will soon release points for all the activity that has occurred on Jediswap v1 to date with a boost. Check out the points logic on our docs: Improved performance and user experience: We have significantly enhanced Jediswap's performance, making it faster and more user-friendly. One notable improvement is the integration of pool analytics directly within the Pool page, eliminating the need for users to navigate to a separate analytics page. Additionally, balance fetching has been optimised for smoother operation. Any liquidity added to pools now updates the My Positions page in real-time. Battle-tested security For this launch, we implemented several security measures. We underwent a rigorous 7-week audit process with Nethermind. With the help of the Nethermind team, we also created a test framework for Jediswap to compare security against Uniswap v3, which has been operational for 3+ years and is one of the most battle-tested smart contracts available. We simulated real data from different Uniswap v3 pools on Jediswap. We achieved a 100% match in the contract state after each on-chain action, such as swaps and liquidity adjustments, bolstering our confidence in our code's security. We will announce many cool things over the next few weeks. Keep an out JediSwap ;) Mint a Galxe NFT: To commemorate this launch, we have published a new campaign on Galxe, which rewards users with an NFT for being an early user of Jediswap v2. To earn the Galxe NFT, add at least $25 worth of liquidity to one of the pools listed in the Galxe quest.

JediSwap

107,537 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

EllesmereUI's Biggest Patch since Raid Frames is live! Aug Evokers since Blizzard won't give you an active state on your CDM for Ebon Might, I decided to give you one. check out the video! This feature also allows trinkets/pots/racials to get custom active states Players who share profiles: you can now include your full spell layout (which spells go where) and per-spell settings for CDM when exporting profiles! ----------- Full patch notes with new features and bugfixes: **Profiles:** - **NEW:** Profile exports can now carry your entire Cooldown Manager setup - which spells sit on which bars plus every per-spell setting - for the specs you choose, so importing a profile recreates your CDM layout instantly. **CDM:** - **NEW:** Give any trinket, potion, racial, or custom spell an Active State that adds its own glow and color while active, plus a Cooldown State Effect that changes its look based on whether it's ready. - **NEW:** Sync your trinkets, potions, and racials across specs with one button so you only set them up once. - Sound pickers for Focus Cast Sound and per-buff Audio Effect now have a search box. - Pandemic glow's Apply to All now also syncs tracking bars and keeps the same glow style everywhere. - A trinket, potion, or racial already on another bar now auto-moves to the new bar instead of being grayed out. - A buff saved under two spell IDs now shows as a single icon in the buff bar preview. - Cooldowns you remove from Blizzard's Cooldown Manager now disappear from your previews, while trinkets, racials, and custom spells are kept. - Added tracking for the Nightborne racial (Arcane Pulse), which was missing from the racial list. **Tracking Bars:** - **NEW:** Grouped bars now pack together with no blank gaps, always filling the next available slot. - Eclipse (Solar) and Eclipse (Lunar) now each drive their own bar. - Switching specs while the page is open now refreshes the selected bar correctly. - Pandemic glow now fires for Lifebloom on you or a group member. **Resource Bars:** - **NEW:** A new GCD Bar fills over your global cooldown, with full control over size, position, color, and look. - Expand Power Bar if No Resource now also expands when the class resource is toggled off or disabled for the spec. - Fixed the threshold color not showing with Enhance 5 Bar Style. - The cast bar latency overlay now reads live latency, so spell queueing no longer stops it showing. **Raid Frames:** - **NEW:** New healer tools including heal-absorb text, a crowd-control glow on debuffs, and more ways to position and highlight dispellable debuffs. - The Auto Resize toggle is now a dropdown that scales Indicators & Auras and Tracked Buffs independently with frame size. - New Show Over Dispels toggle lifts the heal-absorb overlay above the dispel gradient. - Fixed custom (non-20-player) sizes loading at the wrong position after login. **Unit Frames:** - **NEW:** A non-tank threat border shadows your player frame when you pull or hold aggro, with Has Aggro and Close to Aggro colors. - **NEW:** Player health text gains Heal Absorb Amount and Heal Absorb Short options. - **NEW:** Mini frames and Boss frames gain a per-frame Bar Texture dropdown. - **NEW:** Boss frames gain a Hover Borders control with its own mouseover and target colors. - **NEW:** Independent Spacing X and Spacing Y sliders for buff and debuff icons. - **NEW:** Absorb and heal-absorb style dropdowns now include your installed SharedMedia textures (also on Raid Frames and Nameplates). - A new Hover Borders control lets you turn the mouseover highlight border on or off per frame. - New Show 2 for Boss option adds a second decimal to boss frame health text. - Buff and debuff Offset X/Y sliders now reach plus or minus 1500. - A new Cast Bar Position cog adds an Offset Y slider for the boss cast bar. - Player, target, and focus cast bars now show above other frames instead of behind them. - Cast bar timer text now has room so it no longer cuts off early. **Action Bars:** - **NEW:** A new When Not Dragonriding visibility mode hides a bar while skyriding and shows it the rest of the time. - The When Dragonriding option now also shows the bar in Druid Flight Form. - The stance bar now shows its GCD swipe even for spells that don't change form. - Bars are briefly forced visible while Myslot's window is open to stop a stall during import/export. **Minimap:** - **NEW:** Hovering the calendar button now shows your raid and dungeon lockouts with boss progress, server time, and time until the weekly reset. - The Omnium Folio button no longer goes missing or drifts after a loading screen, and its position and scale now persist. **Mythic+ Timer:** - **NEW:** A new Show Time Remaining toggle adds an MM:SS countdown to the +2/+3 threshold row that reddens as time runs out. - Fixed timer and detail text cutting off after a font swap. **Colors:** - **NEW:** A new Global Colors section lets you share one profile's custom colors across all profiles or give each profile its own. **Localization:** - **NEW:** Full Russian language support. **Auras, Buffs & Consumables:** - Warrior stance reminders now read the stance bar, so each spec is reminded of its correct stance and clears the moment it's active. - The Inky Black Potion reminder now clears after you drink the potion and reappears on cancel, expiry, or death. - The last-used flask, food, and weapon-enchant preference now saves correctly. **Nameplates:** - A new sync icon on the Pandemic Glow Style row applies the nameplate's pandemic glow to all CDM and tracking bars at once. **Chat:** - The Whisper Sound dropdown gained a search box. **Bags:** - Mythic Keystone dungeon abbreviations now split on hyphens (Nexus-Point Xenas shows as NPX) and handle localized names.
0:41

EllesmereUI's Biggest Patch since Raid Frames is live! Aug Evokers since Blizzard won't give you an active state on your CDM for Ebon Might, I decided to give you one. check out the video! This feature also allows trinkets/pots/racials to get custom active states Players who share profiles: you can now include your full spell layout (which spells go where) and per-spell settings for CDM when exporting profiles! ----------- Full patch notes with new features and bugfixes: **Profiles:** - **NEW:** Profile exports can now carry your entire Cooldown Manager setup - which spells sit on which bars plus every per-spell setting - for the specs you choose, so importing a profile recreates your CDM layout instantly. **CDM:** - **NEW:** Give any trinket, potion, racial, or custom spell an Active State that adds its own glow and color while active, plus a Cooldown State Effect that changes its look based on whether it's ready. - **NEW:** Sync your trinkets, potions, and racials across specs with one button so you only set them up once. - Sound pickers for Focus Cast Sound and per-buff Audio Effect now have a search box. - Pandemic glow's Apply to All now also syncs tracking bars and keeps the same glow style everywhere. - A trinket, potion, or racial already on another bar now auto-moves to the new bar instead of being grayed out. - A buff saved under two spell IDs now shows as a single icon in the buff bar preview. - Cooldowns you remove from Blizzard's Cooldown Manager now disappear from your previews, while trinkets, racials, and custom spells are kept. - Added tracking for the Nightborne racial (Arcane Pulse), which was missing from the racial list. **Tracking Bars:** - **NEW:** Grouped bars now pack together with no blank gaps, always filling the next available slot. - Eclipse (Solar) and Eclipse (Lunar) now each drive their own bar. - Switching specs while the page is open now refreshes the selected bar correctly. - Pandemic glow now fires for Lifebloom on you or a group member. **Resource Bars:** - **NEW:** A new GCD Bar fills over your global cooldown, with full control over size, position, color, and look. - Expand Power Bar if No Resource now also expands when the class resource is toggled off or disabled for the spec. - Fixed the threshold color not showing with Enhance 5 Bar Style. - The cast bar latency overlay now reads live latency, so spell queueing no longer stops it showing. **Raid Frames:** - **NEW:** New healer tools including heal-absorb text, a crowd-control glow on debuffs, and more ways to position and highlight dispellable debuffs. - The Auto Resize toggle is now a dropdown that scales Indicators & Auras and Tracked Buffs independently with frame size. - New Show Over Dispels toggle lifts the heal-absorb overlay above the dispel gradient. - Fixed custom (non-20-player) sizes loading at the wrong position after login. **Unit Frames:** - **NEW:** A non-tank threat border shadows your player frame when you pull or hold aggro, with Has Aggro and Close to Aggro colors. - **NEW:** Player health text gains Heal Absorb Amount and Heal Absorb Short options. - **NEW:** Mini frames and Boss frames gain a per-frame Bar Texture dropdown. - **NEW:** Boss frames gain a Hover Borders control with its own mouseover and target colors. - **NEW:** Independent Spacing X and Spacing Y sliders for buff and debuff icons. - **NEW:** Absorb and heal-absorb style dropdowns now include your installed SharedMedia textures (also on Raid Frames and Nameplates). - A new Hover Borders control lets you turn the mouseover highlight border on or off per frame. - New Show 2 for Boss option adds a second decimal to boss frame health text. - Buff and debuff Offset X/Y sliders now reach plus or minus 1500. - A new Cast Bar Position cog adds an Offset Y slider for the boss cast bar. - Player, target, and focus cast bars now show above other frames instead of behind them. - Cast bar timer text now has room so it no longer cuts off early. **Action Bars:** - **NEW:** A new When Not Dragonriding visibility mode hides a bar while skyriding and shows it the rest of the time. - The When Dragonriding option now also shows the bar in Druid Flight Form. - The stance bar now shows its GCD swipe even for spells that don't change form. - Bars are briefly forced visible while Myslot's window is open to stop a stall during import/export. **Minimap:** - **NEW:** Hovering the calendar button now shows your raid and dungeon lockouts with boss progress, server time, and time until the weekly reset. - The Omnium Folio button no longer goes missing or drifts after a loading screen, and its position and scale now persist. **Mythic+ Timer:** - **NEW:** A new Show Time Remaining toggle adds an MM:SS countdown to the +2/+3 threshold row that reddens as time runs out. - Fixed timer and detail text cutting off after a font swap. **Colors:** - **NEW:** A new Global Colors section lets you share one profile's custom colors across all profiles or give each profile its own. **Localization:** - **NEW:** Full Russian language support. **Auras, Buffs & Consumables:** - Warrior stance reminders now read the stance bar, so each spec is reminded of its correct stance and clears the moment it's active. - The Inky Black Potion reminder now clears after you drink the potion and reappears on cancel, expiry, or death. - The last-used flask, food, and weapon-enchant preference now saves correctly. **Nameplates:** - A new sync icon on the Pandemic Glow Style row applies the nameplate's pandemic glow to all CDM and tracking bars at once. **Chat:** - The Whisper Sound dropdown gained a search box. **Bags:** - Mythic Keystone dungeon abbreviations now split on hyphens (Nexus-Point Xenas shows as NPX) and handle localized names.

Ellesmere

53,738 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

THE RAILROAD MEN, THE BROKEN RAILS, AND THE NEW MONEY TRACKS OF THE WORLD Let me tell you a story - the kind your granddad might’ve told sitting by a wood stove, the kind that cuts through the fog, the lies, the banker-speak, and hits your soul with the simplicity of: “Of course that’s how it works.” Once upon a time, every nation ran its money on rotten tracks. Not by accident. By design. The tracks were crooked. The switches jammed. The fees were hidden. The travel times were unpredictable. And the men who owned the track… weren’t elected. They liked things confusing. Confusion keeps pockets open and oversight closed. Your money - my money - every paycheck, every wire, every mortgage, every loan - moved through a rickety, blind, 50-year-old rail system nobody could inspect. Governments complained. Businesses complained. People complained. But the track owners just smiled and said: “Trust us.” And everyone did… because what choice did they have? Then one day a new track appeared - smooth, straight, and honest. A track made of math instead of politics. Transparency instead of secrecy. Finality instead of guesswork. It didn’t wiggle. It didn’t reroute. It didn’t stall. It didn’t shake down passengers for lunch money. It settled every transaction in 3–5 seconds. Every time. No exceptions. It didn’t care whether you were a farmer, a banker, or a prime minister. The rules were the rules for everyone. They named this new track: The XRP Ledger. And instead of one man’s company store, it came with: • a built-in currency exchange (no middlemen) • a global bridge asset (XRP) • a native payment router (ILP) • a regulator-friendly design • no downtime in 12 years • no pay-to-play gas wars • no bribed block builders • no “maybe finalized” nonsense • no outages • no drama It worked the same way every day. Like a railroad should. “But why would the big banks switch?” people asked. Here’s the part Paul Harvey would call “the rest of the story.” The bankers didn’t switch because they suddenly found integrity. They switched because they had no choice. The old tracks were collapsing. • Liquidity dried up • Reserve buffers vanished • Regulations tightened • Fraud got illuminated • ISO 20022 turned the lights on • The Treasury demanded transparency • The world demanded atomic settlement And when the Trump Administration began pushing for a new monetary architecture back in 2017, they weren’t doing it for show. They saw the collapse coming. They planned for the rebuild. They positioned the rails. The only rail that met the criteria — ALL the criteria - wasn’t theoretical. It was already running. The common-sense part: If a man needs to get from St. Louis to Chicago fast, safe, and cheap… and only one railroad line actually runs there… you don’t need a PhD or a banker’s certificate to figure out which train he’ll take. You don’t pick the train that: • breaks down • reroutes randomly • charges you a mystery price • doesn’t run on time • or has “great plans coming soon” You pick the one that works today. That’s XRPL. Not “maybe someday.” Not “once upgrades finish.” Not “if the devs agree.” Not “after an L2 patch.” NOW. Right now. Today. Christmas 2025. Why the other tracks failed: Because they were built for casinos, not countries. • Ethereum: Great for gambling, awful for governance. Probabilistic finality + MEV = instant disqualification. • Solana: Fast until it isn’t. Outages aren’t acceptable for global money. • Stellar: Good tech, but not enough muscle. • HBAR/ALGO: Clean systems, tiny liquidity. • Private chains: Interoperability graveyard. It’s like asking a go-kart to pull a freight train. Not gonna happen. And here’s the Trump-style truth bomb: When building a new global money system, you pick the best tool. And the best tool is XRPL. It’s not close. This isn’t hype. This isn’t tribalism. This isn’t crypto Twitter cheering. (2/2, below) Treasury Department Ripple Interledger Foundation
2:19

THE RAILROAD MEN, THE BROKEN RAILS, AND THE NEW MONEY TRACKS OF THE WORLD Let me tell you a story - the kind your granddad might’ve told sitting by a wood stove, the kind that cuts through the fog, the lies, the banker-speak, and hits your soul with the simplicity of: “Of course that’s how it works.” Once upon a time, every nation ran its money on rotten tracks. Not by accident. By design. The tracks were crooked. The switches jammed. The fees were hidden. The travel times were unpredictable. And the men who owned the track… weren’t elected. They liked things confusing. Confusion keeps pockets open and oversight closed. Your money - my money - every paycheck, every wire, every mortgage, every loan - moved through a rickety, blind, 50-year-old rail system nobody could inspect. Governments complained. Businesses complained. People complained. But the track owners just smiled and said: “Trust us.” And everyone did… because what choice did they have? Then one day a new track appeared - smooth, straight, and honest. A track made of math instead of politics. Transparency instead of secrecy. Finality instead of guesswork. It didn’t wiggle. It didn’t reroute. It didn’t stall. It didn’t shake down passengers for lunch money. It settled every transaction in 3–5 seconds. Every time. No exceptions. It didn’t care whether you were a farmer, a banker, or a prime minister. The rules were the rules for everyone. They named this new track: The XRP Ledger. And instead of one man’s company store, it came with: • a built-in currency exchange (no middlemen) • a global bridge asset (XRP) • a native payment router (ILP) • a regulator-friendly design • no downtime in 12 years • no pay-to-play gas wars • no bribed block builders • no “maybe finalized” nonsense • no outages • no drama It worked the same way every day. Like a railroad should. “But why would the big banks switch?” people asked. Here’s the part Paul Harvey would call “the rest of the story.” The bankers didn’t switch because they suddenly found integrity. They switched because they had no choice. The old tracks were collapsing. • Liquidity dried up • Reserve buffers vanished • Regulations tightened • Fraud got illuminated • ISO 20022 turned the lights on • The Treasury demanded transparency • The world demanded atomic settlement And when the Trump Administration began pushing for a new monetary architecture back in 2017, they weren’t doing it for show. They saw the collapse coming. They planned for the rebuild. They positioned the rails. The only rail that met the criteria — ALL the criteria - wasn’t theoretical. It was already running. The common-sense part: If a man needs to get from St. Louis to Chicago fast, safe, and cheap… and only one railroad line actually runs there… you don’t need a PhD or a banker’s certificate to figure out which train he’ll take. You don’t pick the train that: • breaks down • reroutes randomly • charges you a mystery price • doesn’t run on time • or has “great plans coming soon” You pick the one that works today. That’s XRPL. Not “maybe someday.” Not “once upgrades finish.” Not “if the devs agree.” Not “after an L2 patch.” NOW. Right now. Today. Christmas 2025. Why the other tracks failed: Because they were built for casinos, not countries. • Ethereum: Great for gambling, awful for governance. Probabilistic finality + MEV = instant disqualification. • Solana: Fast until it isn’t. Outages aren’t acceptable for global money. • Stellar: Good tech, but not enough muscle. • HBAR/ALGO: Clean systems, tiny liquidity. • Private chains: Interoperability graveyard. It’s like asking a go-kart to pull a freight train. Not gonna happen. And here’s the Trump-style truth bomb: When building a new global money system, you pick the best tool. And the best tool is XRPL. It’s not close. This isn’t hype. This isn’t tribalism. This isn’t crypto Twitter cheering. (2/2, below) Treasury Department Ripple Interledger Foundation

Rob Cunningham

16,017 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten