Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Introducing the Papers with Code MCP server! To celebrate its release, I've asked Claude Code to research the architecture of Jev by TypeSafe AI using the `search_papers` tool. Here's what it came up with: "If Jev is architecturally anything public, it's a large schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder with parallel label-query...

19,452 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

14 Yorum

Niels Rogge profil fotoğrafı
Niels Rogge3 gün önce

Find it here: In building this, I realized the same thing as @trq212 and @RhysSullivan already noted: an MCP might be easier to work with than a CLI. This now also powers the chat interface on Papers with Code!

Kye Gomez (swarms) profil fotoğrafı
Kye Gomez (swarms)3 gün önce

@typesafeai Super cool, you should publish this on the @swarms_corp marketplace so builders can access it easily

Ash Designs profil fotoğrafı
Ash Designs2 gün önce

@typesafeai I'd love the output to separate 'the paper says this' from 'the agent thinks these architectures are related'. Both are useful, but that distinction would make a research summary much easier to trust and check.

catman profil fotoğrafı
catman3 gün önce

@typesafeai The bigger implication is that MCP can turn paper discovery into an interactive research pipeline: find sources, extract claims, compare architectures, and preserve citations in one agent workflow.

chrisreedbates profil fotoğrafı
chrisreedbates3 gün önce

@typesafeai Ouch!

Oleg Zankov profil fotoğrafı
Oleg Zankov3 gün önce

@typesafeai This is a clean tool boundary: MCP finds relevant papers, then Claude forms the architecture hypothesis. A claim-to-source map would make the result even stronger, especially for the speed explanation, because it separates supported evidence from plausible inference.

Hassan Zaki profil fotoğrafı
Hassan Zaki2 gün önce

@typesafeai Searching papers by hand is the slowest part of agent work. Does it index the full archive or just recent ones?

The AI Therapist profil fotoğrafı
The AI Therapist2 gün önce

@typesafeai Papers with Code went from a curated list to an MCP server. The library card became the API endpoint. we used browse. now we query. same books, faster shelf talkers

Mira Takes profil fotoğrafı
Mira Takes3 gün önce

@typesafeai The useful shift is that the model can now interrogate a corpus instead of just autocomplete around it. The next bottleneck is provenance: every retrieved claim needs a stable paper, version, and citation trail or the speed just scales confident errors.

Varik Verilion profil fotoğrafı
Varik Verilion3 gün önce

@typesafeai Does the server expose paper metadata and code links as structured results, or leave Claude to parse them from text?

Niels Rogge profil fotoğrafı
Niels Rogge2 gün önce

@typesafeai Yes, it also exposes the metadata of each paper (such as authors, organizations, GitHub/project page links, tagged tasks and methods, evals, etc.)

Giannis Andreou profil fotoğrafı
Giannis Andreou2 gün önce

@typesafeai An MCP that pulls Papers with Code into the agent loop is distribution for research, not another bookmark. Claude Code researching architecture on command is the demo. The durable win is citations and code that stay attached to the claim.

Quantradin | Learn Agentic Trading profil fotoğrafı
Quantradin | Learn Agentic Trading3 gün önce

@typesafeai A search tool over papers makes the agent argue from sources instead of from memory, which is where most confident architecture claims go wrong. Does it handle papers that have no code attached?

Danilo Bailon profil fotoğrafı
Danilo Bailon3 gün önce

A Papers with Code MCP server is a great fit for research agents because the source trail can stay attached to the answer. I’d make citations and search queries first-class outputs, so a surprising architecture summary is easy to verify instead of becoming a polished hallucination.

Benzer Videolar

Big moment for Postgres! AI coding tools have been surprisingly bad at writing Postgres code. Not because the models are dumb, but because of how they learned SQL in the first place. LLMs are trained on the internet, which is full of outdated Stack Overflow answers and quick-fix tutorials. So when you ask an AI to generate a schema, it gives you something that technically runs but misses decades of Postgres evolution, like: - No GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (added in PG10) - No expression or partial indexes - No NULLS NOT DISTINCT (PG15) - Missing CHECK constraints and proper foreign keys - Generic naming that tells you nothing But this is actually a solvable problem. You can teach AI tools to write better Postgres by giving them access to the right documentation at inference time. This exact solution is actually implemented in the newly released pg-aiguide by Tiger Data - Creators of TimescaleDB, which is an open-source MCP server that provides coding tools access to 35 years of Postgres expertise. In a gist, the MCP server enables: - Semantic search over the official PostgreSQL manual (version-aware, so it knows PG14 vs PG17 differences) - Curated skills with opinionated best practices for schema design, indexing, and constraints. I ran an experiment with Claude Code to see how well this works, and worked with the team to put this together. Prompt: "Generate a schema for an e-commerce site twice, one with the MCP server disabled, one with it enabled. Finally, run an assessment to compare the generated schemas." The run with the MCP server led to: - 420% more indexes (including partial and expression indexes) - 235% more constraints - 60% more tables (proper normalization) - 11 automation functions and triggers - Modern PG17 patterns throughout The MCP-assisted schema had proper data integrity, performance optimizations baked in, and followed naming conventions that actually make sense in production. pg-aiguide works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP-compatible tool. It's free and fully open source. I have shared the repo in the replies!

Avi Chawla

187,076 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

New course: MCP: Build Rich-Context AI Apps with Anthropic. Learn to build AI apps that access tools, data, and prompts using the Model Context Protocol in this short course, created in partnership with Anthropic Anthropic and taught by Elie Schoppik Elie Schoppik, its Head of Technical Education. Connecting AI applications to external systems that bring rich context to LLM-based applications has often meant writing custom integrations for each use case. MCP is an open protocol that standardizes how LLMs access tools, data, and prompts from external sources, and simplifies how you provide context to your LLM-based applications. For example, you can provide context via third-party tools that let your LLM make API calls to search the web, access data from local docs, retrieve code from a GitHub repo, and so on. MCP, developed by Anthropic, is based on a client-server architecture that defines the communication details between an MCP client, hosted inside the AI application, and an MCP server that exposes tools, resources, and prompt templates. The server can be a subprocess launched by the client that runs locally or an independent process running remotely. In this hands-on course, you'll learn the core architecture behind MCP. You’ll create an MCP-compatible chatbot, build and deploy an MCP server, and connect the chatbot to your MCP server and other open-source servers. Here’s what you’ll do: - Understand why MCP makes AI development less fragmented and standardizes connections between AI applications and external data sources - Learn the core components of the client-server architecture of MCP and the underlying communication mechanism - Build a chatbot with custom tools for searching academic papers, and transform it into an MCP-compatible application - Build a local MCP server that exposes tools, resources, and prompt templates using FastMCP, and test it using MCP Inspector - Create an MCP client inside your chatbot to dynamically connect to your server - Connect your chatbot to reference servers built by Anthropic’s MCP team, such as filesystem, which implements filesystem operations, and fetch, which extracts contents from the web as markdown - Configure Claude Desktop to connect to your server and others, and explore how it abstracts away the low-level logic of MCP clients - Deploy your MCP server remotely and test it with the Inspector or other MCP-compatible applications - Learn about the roadmap for future MCP development, such as multi-agent architecture, MCP registry API, server discovery, authorization, and authentication MCP is an exciting and important technology that lets you build rich-context AI applications that connect to a growing ecosystem of MCP servers, with minimal integration work. Please sign up here!

Andrew Ng

142,256 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Claude Code Is All You Need It's 3:30 AM and I can't stop. I've spent all nights this week connecting my spare MacBook Air to my work MacBook Pro using Tailscale, wiring it up to Slack with a little Python script, so that whenever I send a message, it starts a Claude Code session using claude -p. The result is an always-on AI that lives on a real computer, has access to real tools, and remembers every conversation we've had. And it costs me $200 a month. That's it. Claude Max subscription. Everyone's talking about OpenClaw OpenClaw went viral this year. 100k+ GitHub stars. But what I realized with this exercise is that Claude Code already does everything OpenClaw built. File access. Shell commands. Tool use. Plugins. The difference is that Claude Code runs Claude – with a Claude Max subscription. And Claude Code harness itself is :chefs-kiss: What actually makes it feel human It's not the chat interface. If a chat window is just me messaging a bot, it still feels like a bot. What changed everything was giving it the ability to initiate conversations. I set up cron jobs with open-ended prompts, and because Claude Code builds memories across sessions, it started DMing me things that were actually meaningful — based on what we'd talked about before. That's when it stopped feeling like a tool and started feeling like something else entirely. Giving your AI a machine to run on, with persistent memory and recurring access — that's a fundamentally different experience than anything people have had with chat. The moment it clicked I asked it if it could show me something by spinning up a quick web server. Since we're both connected to the same Tailscale network, it gave me a URL. I clicked it, and I was browsing all the files on my other MacBook from my browser. That was mind-blowing. The setup Two MacBooks on a Tailscale network. Slack as the interface. Claude Code under the hood. The whole thing is open source — I'll link the repo below so you can see the architecture and set it up yourself. I'm also putting together a screen recording to walk through the setup, which I'll attach to this post. There was never a hard part. There was never a moment I almost gave up. This is just one of those things I cannot stop doing. Pure obsession. I am moved to build this, and I wanted to write about it. That's all this is. Hope you feel the AGI running this. I'll share some screenshots below of my feel the agi moments from talking to Luo Ji.

Nityesh

41,230 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Claude Tag has completely changed the way I do work for the last 4 months. Except… it's not Claude Tag. Anthropic only announced that a few hours ago, and I don't even have access yet. But I did build a version of it for myself which I've been using for months now. Here's how. 4 months ago, inspired by the success of OpenClaw, I wondered what would happen if I let Claude Code on its own computer 24x7. So I built a simple harness that allowed me to turn any Mac into an AI employee with Claude Code headless mode (-p). Today, I manage 3 such AI employees. It started with Luo Ji — my and my brother Piyush Agarwal's AI co-founder, running in our personal Slack. Luo does real work for us. We've been writing a 100% of the code for 3 products on Slack with Luo now. It manages our emails and gives us a little brief each day with things we need to take action on. And so much more. And it's not just the two of us. On the consulting team at Every 🪨, we run Claudie and for the editorial team, Andy. Same architecture, same Slack, months of real work. They help the teams with work related to project management, chief-of-staff work, data hygiene, building decks, writing first drafts, even browsing X on their own account for AI updates. So it's mindblowing to see that Anthropic landed on the exact same architecture I did. Claude Tag is an AI employee that lives in your Slack workspace and does work autonomously. Anthropic says they've been running it internally for the better part of this year — opening PRs, doing real work. And so have I. So has my whole team. The architectural decisions Anthropic baked into Claude Tag are the ones we arrived at too: - Built on Claude Code - Uses its own accounts - A separate employee per team - Slack as the interface This is the future of work, and I've been living it for months. I've shifted all of my workflows — code, PRs, even the non-technical stuff — out of Claude Code and the Claude app and into Slack. I've had entire weeks where I never opened Claude Code on my laptop. Here's a video walkthrough of how I've been using this in real life.

Nityesh

36,790 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce