Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Introducing VT FelixClick an Aimlabs pressure click-type scenario that involves targets peeking and strafing towards the player. - Created for Amped player Felix. - Great for practicing calm/composed aim, and micros. ✏️@Lowgravity56 | 🎙️ VT Matty | 💡 VT minigod

16,174 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Voltaic's profile picture
Voltaic2 years ago

To play go to and type in ''VT Felix Click'' all the scenario variants should show there! Task Variants: - VT Felix Click Easy (Bigger & Strafes slower) - VT Felix Click (Strafes) - VT Felix Click Harder (Strafes & Crouches) - VT Felix Click Insane (Strafes, Jumps & Crouches) - VT Felix Click Insane Harder (Same as previous, but faster) Bonus - Download Aimlabs - Aimlabs+ Code VOLTAIC50 for 50% OFF #aimlabspartner

VT LG56 🚀's profile picture
VT LG56 🚀2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @Matty_OW @minigodcs my goat @minigodcs always makes me cook

Felix's profile picture
Felix2 years ago

@aimlab @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs Damnnnn okay 👀

bvop's profile picture
bvop2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs oh my lordy lord. you have done it again voltaic 😻thank you for this wonderous scenario i can’t wait to play this and finally get calm radiant aim

VT Yrup's profile picture
VT Yrup2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs Pewdiepie click sick!

smoke's profile picture
smoke2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs W. I got 2 aces in valorant since this task came out 🔥(i didn't even played it yet but i will do it in a moment)

✦ wapaam's profile picture
✦ wapaam2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs super good scen

Sasà's profile picture
Sasà2 years ago

@aimlab @Felix_6393 @lowgravity56 @Matty_OW @minigodcs I've reached out on modmail to have my ban lifted for the Voltaic Discord server. My account was hijacked but since the day I appealed I haven't received any updates. I can't DM you since I don't have Premium.

Related Videos

🚨 Reporter asks Ayyoub Bouaddi about his future after the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the club he dreams of playing for: 🎙️ Reporter: “Ayyoub, after the World Cup there will be a lot of clubs interested in you. Have you thought about your future?” 🗣️ Ayyoub Bouaddi: “My focus right now is completely on Morocco and the World Cup. This is the biggest tournament in football and I want to enjoy every moment of it. The future can wait.” 🎙️ Reporter: “But is there one club you dream of playing for?” 🗣️ Ayyoub Bouaddi: “I think every young player has a dream club. For me, Manchester United is a club that has always stood out. When you grow up watching football, you see the history, the atmosphere, the legends and everything that makes the club special. It is one of the biggest clubs in the world.” 🎙️ Reporter: “What attracts you to Manchester United?” 🗣️ Ayyoub Bouaddi: “The history. The supporters. The pressure that comes with wearing the shirt. I like challenges and Manchester United is the type of club where you have to prove yourself every single week. That motivates me. When I think about great midfielders, great European nights and the atmosphere at Old Trafford, it is something every footballer would love to experience.” 🎙️ Reporter: “So could you see yourself there one day?” 🗣️ Ayyoub Bouaddi: “Football is unpredictable, so you never know what will happen. But if you ask me honestly, Manchester United is definitely one of the clubs I would love to play for in the future. For now, though, my focus is helping Morocco have a great World Cup campaign “. {Radio Maisha }

SethOfficial

190,155 views • 3 months ago

The Ghost in the Machine: How Player Pianos Sparked Protests, and What They Reveal About Our AI Future In the early 1900s, the player piano was a sensation. These self-playing instruments used perforated paper rolls fed through pneumatic mechanisms to reproduce complex piano performances automatically. By the 1910s to mid-1920s, they outsold ordinary pianos in many markets, filling American parlors, saloons, and theaters with ragtime, marches, and classical pieces. Great artists like Sergei Rachmaninoff and Ignace Paderewski cut rolls, preserving their interpretations for generations. It was automation that brought “live” music into every home, without the need for lessons or live performers. Yet this marvel triggered intense resistance. Composers and musicians saw it as an existential threat. In his fiery 1906 essay “The Menace of Mechanical Music,” bandleader and composer John Philip Sousa warned that player pianos and phonographs would “substitute machinery for the human soul.” He predicted the death of amateur music-making: children would stop learning instruments, families would stop gathering around the piano, and music would lose its emotional depth. Sousa testified before Congress, helping drive the 1909 Copyright Act, which created compulsory licensing so composers could earn royalties from mechanical reproductions, a landmark victory born from protest. As “talkies” and radio displaced theater orchestras in the late 1920s, the American Federation of Musicians (AFM) launched the Music Defense League in 1930. Funded by a tax on members, the union spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (millions in today’s dollars) on a national advertising blitz. Dramatic newspaper ads depicted sinister robots replacing human musicians, with slogans like “Is Art to Have a Tyrant?” and warnings that “canned music” would destroy jobs and degrade culture. The campaign targeted not just records but all mechanical music, including player pianos in public spaces. While there were no Luddite-style riots smashing machines (player pianos were mostly expensive home devices), the opposition was fierce: boycotts, lobbying, lawsuits, and cultural shaming of anyone who chose “the robot” over living performers. The protests did not kill the player piano. Record sales, radio, and the Great Depression did that by the early 1930s. But the episode left a lasting legacy: new copyright rules, heightened awareness of technology’s impact on artists, and a template for how workers respond to automation. We are living through the same story with AI and robotics. Generative models now compose music, write screenplays, generate art, and even perform. Musicians, writers, and visual artists are protesting in eerily familiar ways: lawsuits over unlicensed training data (the modern equivalent of the player-piano royalty fight), demands for “human-made” labels, strikes by Hollywood writers and actors, and public campaigns against “AI slop.” Fears echo Sousa’s exactly: loss of soul, authenticity, jobs, and human connection. “The robot is coming” ads of 1930 could run unchanged today, just swap “canned music” for “AI-generated content.” History’s lesson is nuanced. The player piano did not end music; it briefly coexisted with live performance before giving way to richer ecosystems. Rolls by legends now serve as priceless archives. Protests forced legal compromises that protected creators while allowing innovation. Yet real displacement happened. Thousands of theater musicians lost steady work, and the cultural shift toward passive consumption was real. Today’s AI moment carries higher stakes: it threatens not just one profession but broad swaths of cognitive and creative labor. Robots and AI could augment surgeons, drivers, teachers, and artists, or render many obsolete. The player-piano saga shows that raw Luddism rarely wins, We cannot stop technological progress, The music plays on. The question is: who, or what, plays it?

Brian Roemmele

118,152 views • 4 months ago