正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

#IPCC has successfully finished the Scoping Meeting and produced a draft outline for the Special Report on Climate Change and Cities. 🎥 Our Chair, Jim Skea, expresses his gratitude to the government of Latvia and to Riga city for their warm welcome.

11,967 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

6 条评论

Ladislaus Chang'a 的头像
Ladislaus Chang'a2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC It has ben exciting and remarkable working with scientists and practioners to produce a draft outline for the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Cities, which will be the first product in AR7 co-designed and co-produced with enhanced inclusivity and multi-disciplinarity

Akm Edian 的头像
Akm Edian2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC

Pinheiro 的头像
Pinheiro2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC Have you studied the effects of cloud coverage and albedo in temperature? Nobel laureate John Clauser, talks about this👇

David Salaski 的头像
David Salaski2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC Has nothing to do with temperatures or “saving the planet”. The entire environmentalist / climate change crowd are only concerned with destroying capitalism.

Kārlis Eihenbaums 🇱🇻 的头像
Kārlis Eihenbaums 🇱🇻2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC Thanks, the pleasure was ours!

Claudia Larrea 的头像
Claudia Larrea2 年前

@JimSkeaIPCC Me dejaste solita,

相关视频

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,083 次观看 • 2 年前