正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

IQ matters.

₿en Wehrman

114,881 subscribers

29,637 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

IQ matters. [🎥: @rossduhboss]

IQ matters. [🎥: @rossduhboss]

₿en Wehrman

11,837 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here is Nixon discussing School performance with a scientist… The teachers don’t matter, the funding doesn’t matter, the IQ and race of the kids matters… and once a school is majority minority, the performance tanks.

Here is Nixon discussing School performance with a scientist… The teachers don’t matter, the funding doesn’t matter, the IQ and race of the kids matters… and once a school is majority minority, the performance tanks.

Uncommon Sense

122,021 次观看 • 6 个月前

What matters most in life? Not money. Not IQ. Harvard's Grant Study says it plainly: Happiness is love. Full stop. Add learning, contribution, and time well spent—and you’ve got the ingredients of a good life.

What matters most in life? Not money. Not IQ. Harvard's Grant Study says it plainly: Happiness is love. Full stop. Add learning, contribution, and time well spent—and you’ve got the ingredients of a good life.

Daniel Pink

11,178 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON MUSK: "One of the things I found over time is that, in terms of like recruiting people to the company, or having people work with the company, their individual abilities, their intellectual capabilities matter a lot, but it also matters if they have a good heart. It's not just about whether somebody has, you know, certain IQ or whatever, but like a good person that matters, that matters a lot."

ELON MUSK: "One of the things I found over time is that, in terms of like recruiting people to the company, or having people work with the company, their individual abilities, their intellectual capabilities matter a lot, but it also matters if they have a good heart. It's not just about whether somebody has, you know, certain IQ or whatever, but like a good person that matters, that matters a lot."

DogeDesigner

88,789 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Giants are in that spot where every pick matters. Do you get your young QB more help or trust the defense. Broke it down with NFL IQ from Amazon Web Services and Next Gen Stats Take a look at

The Giants are in that spot where every pick matters. Do you get your young QB more help or trust the defense. Broke it down with NFL IQ from Amazon Web Services and Next Gen Stats Take a look at

Dan Orlovsky

79,409 次观看 • 3 个月前

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) posted another late rant about race because that’s all she ever talks about. She’s mad Republicans are going after Democrat seats in Texas. Crockett obsesses about race because she’s a DEI hire too low IQ to consider what matters to Americans.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) posted another late rant about race because that’s all she ever talks about. She’s mad Republicans are going after Democrat seats in Texas. Crockett obsesses about race because she’s a DEI hire too low IQ to consider what matters to Americans.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

249,664 次观看 • 1 年前

Nick Fuentes says nothing Jake Shields says matters because he is stupid. "He is a low iq ignorant retard. I don't think even he knows where he is half the time." And he's a slave for Dan Khazarian.. They are literally Dumb & Dumber 😭

Nick Fuentes says nothing Jake Shields says matters because he is stupid. "He is a low iq ignorant retard. I don't think even he knows where he is half the time." And he's a slave for Dan Khazarian.. They are literally Dumb & Dumber 😭

KaizerRev

59,117 次观看 • 14 天前

-One of the best shooters in the nation! -High IQ Player -Coachable -3.6 G.P.A. 4 Year colleges, this is a no brainer. Ryan Payne is one of the best shooters I've ever Coached. Makes the right play and plays to win. Every possession matters to him. JUCOadvocate - Brandon Goble

-One of the best shooters in the nation! -High IQ Player -Coachable -3.6 G.P.A. 4 Year colleges, this is a no brainer. Ryan Payne is one of the best shooters I've ever Coached. Makes the right play and plays to win. Every possession matters to him. JUCOadvocate - Brandon Goble

Northeastern Men's Basketball

21,300 次观看 • 2 年前

This video is an example of a real-life IQ test. Diving into water with an unknown depth is incredibly dangerous. The thing is, the depth is known. You can see people standing in it. To make matters worse, a second person dives in AFTER. I don't even know what to say.

This video is an example of a real-life IQ test. Diving into water with an unknown depth is incredibly dangerous. The thing is, the depth is known. You can see people standing in it. To make matters worse, a second person dives in AFTER. I don't even know what to say.

9mmSMG

263,725 次观看 • 1 年前

WHAT IS ‘THE GREAT REPLACEMENT’❓ You can’t replace the greatest civilization in history with 3rd world barbarians. The goal is not to replace us with an equivalent society. The goal is the extermination of white free thinkers. IQ matters. We are dangerously intelligent people. The real ‘Replacement’ strategy unveiled, with Deutschland Kurier.

WHAT IS ‘THE GREAT REPLACEMENT’❓ You can’t replace the greatest civilization in history with 3rd world barbarians. The goal is not to replace us with an equivalent society. The goal is the extermination of white free thinkers. IQ matters. We are dangerously intelligent people. The real ‘Replacement’ strategy unveiled, with Deutschland Kurier.

Naomi Seibt

402,166 次观看 • 5 个月前

The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro ATTACKS Vice President JD Vance for not denouncing Tucker Carlson: “So here’s the bottom line: It is not possible to humor low IQ slop and then assume it will not have consequences. Honoring garbage is exacerbating garbage.” “Laughing along with the purveyors of bullsh*t, while occasionally tut-tutting, and then when push comes to shove, defending the overall importance of grifters and nuts, popularizes the worst ideas. And that matters.” “It matters, because when the same figures push the demoralization opp that America is run by nefarious forces beyond your control. When you prop up and promote those people who do that sort of stuff, you make people’s lives worse. You’re making American politics worse, and that does make the world a worse place.” “Terrible low IQ slop ideas have consequences. Stop burnishing them.”

The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro ATTACKS Vice President JD Vance for not denouncing Tucker Carlson: “So here’s the bottom line: It is not possible to humor low IQ slop and then assume it will not have consequences. Honoring garbage is exacerbating garbage.” “Laughing along with the purveyors of bullsh*t, while occasionally tut-tutting, and then when push comes to shove, defending the overall importance of grifters and nuts, popularizes the worst ideas. And that matters.” “It matters, because when the same figures push the demoralization opp that America is run by nefarious forces beyond your control. When you prop up and promote those people who do that sort of stuff, you make people’s lives worse. You’re making American politics worse, and that does make the world a worse place.” “Terrible low IQ slop ideas have consequences. Stop burnishing them.”

RedWave Press

80,132 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk on recruiting: Being a good person matters just as much as having a high IQ. Jamie Dimon: “From when you started to today, what lessons have you learned, how have you changed both as a leader and as a person?” Elon: “Well, I think I'm probably more chill than I used to be. I'm way more laid back than I used to be. I'm still not that laid back, but, you know, more than I used to be, for sure. One of the things I found over time is that in terms of recruiting people to the company or having people work at the company, their intellectual capabilities matter a lot, but it also matters if they have a good heart. It's not just about whether somebody has a certain IQ or whatever, but are they a good person. That matters a lot. I guess I've learned a lot, although I feel like I still have a lot to learn and make a lot of mistakes. Maybe the future AI will say, not bad for a human.” Source: Elon Musk Interviewed by Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan, June 5, 2026

Elon Musk on recruiting: Being a good person matters just as much as having a high IQ. Jamie Dimon: “From when you started to today, what lessons have you learned, how have you changed both as a leader and as a person?” Elon: “Well, I think I'm probably more chill than I used to be. I'm way more laid back than I used to be. I'm still not that laid back, but, you know, more than I used to be, for sure. One of the things I found over time is that in terms of recruiting people to the company or having people work at the company, their intellectual capabilities matter a lot, but it also matters if they have a good heart. It's not just about whether somebody has a certain IQ or whatever, but are they a good person. That matters a lot. I guess I've learned a lot, although I feel like I still have a lot to learn and make a lot of mistakes. Maybe the future AI will say, not bad for a human.” Source: Elon Musk Interviewed by Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan, June 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

30,911 次观看 • 1 个月前

LeBron James says San Antonio continues to get lucky as fu*k with these generational talented IQ players: “You know David Robinson, Tim Duncan and now Wemby like you know guys who just have this dead serious mentality. You know, they have these horse blinders on and they like the mission is the mission and that’s all that matters, you know, and it’s pretty remarkable to see.” (Via Mind the Game)

LeBron James says San Antonio continues to get lucky as fu*k with these generational talented IQ players: “You know David Robinson, Tim Duncan and now Wemby like you know guys who just have this dead serious mentality. You know, they have these horse blinders on and they like the mission is the mission and that’s all that matters, you know, and it’s pretty remarkable to see.” (Via Mind the Game)

NBA Courtside

547,409 次观看 • 1 个月前

War is a Battle of INTELLIGENCE! Listener Questions Philosopher Stefan Molyneux unpacks Iran's real average IQ near 84 via Richard Lynn's data, shattering online test myths, political censorship and ideological fury to reveal intelligence's raw grip on civilizations. Questions: "Would you say your love for the music of Freddy Mercury is the primary factor that has unconsciously influenced you to repeatedly make false claims on X that the average IQ of Iran is 104-106. Firstly Stef, I’m a man who is deeply fascinated by the topic of IQ. And having said that I know that the IQ of Iran is roughly 84. I of course am not an IQ scientist/researcher myself but I have several sources from the top IQ experts some of which you probably have heard of (or maybe even interviewed on your show!). Now data from the most prominent IQ scientist Richard Lynn confirms the average IQ of Iran to be 84 (Citation 'The Wealth of Nations (2002), pg.133'. Which conversely is not only 20 points lower than your outrageous 104 IQ claim but is also even lower than Iraq which is 87. Now of course in a country of 90 million people you might have a million people with an IQ of 104 and let’s say 90,000 people with an IQ of >129 (See Normal Distribution charts attached below). So you will have some very smart people in Iran, but these people are an extreme minority generated by the bell curve of genetics being thrown 90 million times!, so as a whole on average most of the 90 million Iranians are borderline intellectually disabled. Now Stef back to your claim. Your claim is OUTRAGEOUS! You claim the IQ of Iran is 104-106, which is complete nonsense. I mean Stef think about what you’re saying Stef. Your saying the IQ of Iran a dysfunctional country majority populated with brainwashed borderline mentally dysfunctional people is the same as a highly industrious, innovative and merit based futuristic tech megalopolis like Japan. I mean spend one day in Japan and spend one day in Iran and I imagine the experience would be like worlds apart, yet you Stef claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan??? WHATTT???? Does randomly firing missiles every so often like a child having a tantrum prove anything but the government of Iran is full of low IQ dysfunctional people. Now I know the IQ of the government is not necessarily the same as the general population. BUT, if the IQ of the general population was really that much higher than the governing leaders, then those moronic leaders would have been deposed of by the people a long time ago. Yet they weren't, so we should infer the general population isn’t in fact that much more intelligent than the government’s. Stef, in the West you might encounter Iranians who are very smart, but it goes without saying this sample is a very biased sample. What is particularly strange about all this, is you Stef are a man with a very high knowledge about IQ’s effect on national wealth and civil decorum and functionality, yet despite Iran being a highly dysfunctional nation at practically any level you can look at, you Stef echo a claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan and even higher than Western Europe! How ABSURD! Which brings me back to my initial question. (Continued...) "freedomain (Continuing on ->) So Stef, when otherwise rational people act out of character and push fake news based on data that is from a biased sample (or is possibly even data that has been manipulated and propagated as a psy-op by the Iranian government) when they otherwise wouldn't ordinarily do so, one naturally has to ask WHY??? In my opinion, I think I know the answer. Stef, the only thing that explains this BIZARRE behaviour of yours (tweeting unverified claims about IQ), is you Stef have a bias in favour of Iran which I think stems from your love of Freddy Mercury music. Would you agree Stef? "(*** Stef you did tweet out a Youtube video of a Freddy Mercury song at about the same time you made your Iran IQ tweets, so I think the evidence is clear Stef, Freddy Mercury was on your mind, when you made those fake news Iran 104 IQ tweets.) "Now, lastly Stef you might be asking, why putting out a FALSE tweet falsely claiming the IQ of Iran is 104 even matter's that much? To that I would say it matters a whole lot because IQ of course matters a whole lot, including in regards to military objectives and war. Like ask why would invading Iran be any different from Iraq? Did Trump invade Iran because he thought it would lead to a different outcome because Trump views the population of Iran to be quote 'high IQ people'? (as Trump even said so as much in the last 24 hours.) "BUT … Mr. Trump, what if Iran isn't populated by high IQ people, what if Mr. Trump you were misled by fake news that Mr. Molyneux negligently tweeted rather than read the actual source material. (Lynn, 'The Wealth of Nations' (2002) IQ of Iran = 84). Well, Mr. Trump if you believed the average IQ of the population of Iran was 104 then you Mr. Trump might have assumed that all you had to do was take out the authoritarian government and then the high IQ population will swiftly bring about peace and democracy. But Mr. Trump, what if the average IQ of Iran is not 104? What if the top IQ scientists such as Lynn were right and the average IQ of Iran is in fact 84? Well then Mr. Trump, then your dealing with a very low IQ population, who will be frankly impossible to deal with, they will inevitably vote for another dictator and you Mr. Trump will find yourself in another forever war. That is why national IQ matters and that is why putting out false unverified and unsubstantiated tweets about IQ is a great error of judgment. Lastly to conclude, I believe in the great predictive power of IQ like you Stef, which is why I think it would be incumbent upon you to put out a correction unless you have verified sources from other top IQ researchers that support your OUTRAGEOUS Iran 104 National IQ claim." "Hi Stef! when communicating philosophy or philosophical ideas to the average person, and they respond with confusion or indifference, how do we know whether we have failed to adequately relay the ideas or if it is just too complex a language for them to grasp? I know everyone is capable of understanding philosophy on some level even if they’re lower IQ, so could the disconnect come from the disparity of time spent in the subject?" "Your Sunday (3/15) show was incredible. As a Catholic, that opening monologue challenging today's Christians to answer with clarity what Jesus commands via the Good Samaritan parable, especially when it comes to the specific child abuse scenario you laid out, it left me with a deep sense of sorrow for what you endured, and my own sense of frustration with the leadership of the Church. "The reality that not one, no church leaders, Anglican or not, lay or religious influencers; no one has tried to dialogue with you to address these essential issues, when you have been pointing them out for decades is more than disappointing to hear. "(Not as disappointing as some of the immediate live caller responses yesterday... the second woman was out of line, and the gentleman who landed on the idea that if you had not been abused, we wouldn't have received your philosophy gifts was hard to stomach.) "Nonetheless, if one (myself) was going to try to reach out, share your 3/15 show and try to coordinate a dialogue just to deal with the Good Samaritan and cold abuse topic, is that something you would be comfortable with? "second question "a few days ago, someone asked about how you feel about the Shroud of Turin, maybe you missed it but there has been renewed interest in the Shroud the last few years when a new photo 'negative' that appeared in 2024 along with new studies that for many was very compelling ... from a reason and evidence standpoint... to the image being impossible to reproduce. "I could be wrong but I felt like your answer lumped it so quickly with other things ... I believe u mentioned people of faith like Aquinas have searched for 'proof' for centuries. And you found that people of faith who are seeking proof to be an interesting paradox. "are you able to revisit this topic and assess what authenticating (if we are to believe the new reporting) that specific historical artifact could mean for at least establishing how the image came to be on the cloth? "again appreciate all u do to improve the world via philosophy and advocating for objective morality." "America in WW2 has burned down some and bombed all the major cities in Japan, even using the atomic bomb to create a glimpse of hell never before seen on earth. Yet today, the alliance between US and Japan couldnt be friendlier. In the middle east, we’ve also bombed them to next week and back for 30 or so years. And they still, understandably, hate the US. What do you think causes this difference in point of view between the countries? Is it religion/culture? Could it be IQ? Forgive me if this is too politcal or naive a question. Thank you!" "My martial arts club have a Hazing ritual that I believe is immoral and useless. I trying to get it banned. "Whats your opinions on hazing? Is it for example always immoral?" 0:00:00 The IQ Controversy 0:12:15 Discussing Iranian IQ Studies 0:29:34 Philosophy and Resistance to Truth 0:34:59 Philosophers and Child Abuse 0:38:16 The Shroud of Turin and Faith 0:45:21 Moral Dilemmas and Divine Intervention 0:48:37 Bumper Stickers and Performative Virtue 0:51:10 Closing Thoughts and Support GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!

War is a Battle of INTELLIGENCE! Listener Questions Philosopher Stefan Molyneux unpacks Iran's real average IQ near 84 via Richard Lynn's data, shattering online test myths, political censorship and ideological fury to reveal intelligence's raw grip on civilizations. Questions: "Would you say your love for the music of Freddy Mercury is the primary factor that has unconsciously influenced you to repeatedly make false claims on X that the average IQ of Iran is 104-106. Firstly Stef, I’m a man who is deeply fascinated by the topic of IQ. And having said that I know that the IQ of Iran is roughly 84. I of course am not an IQ scientist/researcher myself but I have several sources from the top IQ experts some of which you probably have heard of (or maybe even interviewed on your show!). Now data from the most prominent IQ scientist Richard Lynn confirms the average IQ of Iran to be 84 (Citation 'The Wealth of Nations (2002), pg.133'. Which conversely is not only 20 points lower than your outrageous 104 IQ claim but is also even lower than Iraq which is 87. Now of course in a country of 90 million people you might have a million people with an IQ of 104 and let’s say 90,000 people with an IQ of >129 (See Normal Distribution charts attached below). So you will have some very smart people in Iran, but these people are an extreme minority generated by the bell curve of genetics being thrown 90 million times!, so as a whole on average most of the 90 million Iranians are borderline intellectually disabled. Now Stef back to your claim. Your claim is OUTRAGEOUS! You claim the IQ of Iran is 104-106, which is complete nonsense. I mean Stef think about what you’re saying Stef. Your saying the IQ of Iran a dysfunctional country majority populated with brainwashed borderline mentally dysfunctional people is the same as a highly industrious, innovative and merit based futuristic tech megalopolis like Japan. I mean spend one day in Japan and spend one day in Iran and I imagine the experience would be like worlds apart, yet you Stef claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan??? WHATTT???? Does randomly firing missiles every so often like a child having a tantrum prove anything but the government of Iran is full of low IQ dysfunctional people. Now I know the IQ of the government is not necessarily the same as the general population. BUT, if the IQ of the general population was really that much higher than the governing leaders, then those moronic leaders would have been deposed of by the people a long time ago. Yet they weren't, so we should infer the general population isn’t in fact that much more intelligent than the government’s. Stef, in the West you might encounter Iranians who are very smart, but it goes without saying this sample is a very biased sample. What is particularly strange about all this, is you Stef are a man with a very high knowledge about IQ’s effect on national wealth and civil decorum and functionality, yet despite Iran being a highly dysfunctional nation at practically any level you can look at, you Stef echo a claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan and even higher than Western Europe! How ABSURD! Which brings me back to my initial question. (Continued...) "freedomain (Continuing on ->) So Stef, when otherwise rational people act out of character and push fake news based on data that is from a biased sample (or is possibly even data that has been manipulated and propagated as a psy-op by the Iranian government) when they otherwise wouldn't ordinarily do so, one naturally has to ask WHY??? In my opinion, I think I know the answer. Stef, the only thing that explains this BIZARRE behaviour of yours (tweeting unverified claims about IQ), is you Stef have a bias in favour of Iran which I think stems from your love of Freddy Mercury music. Would you agree Stef? "(*** Stef you did tweet out a Youtube video of a Freddy Mercury song at about the same time you made your Iran IQ tweets, so I think the evidence is clear Stef, Freddy Mercury was on your mind, when you made those fake news Iran 104 IQ tweets.) "Now, lastly Stef you might be asking, why putting out a FALSE tweet falsely claiming the IQ of Iran is 104 even matter's that much? To that I would say it matters a whole lot because IQ of course matters a whole lot, including in regards to military objectives and war. Like ask why would invading Iran be any different from Iraq? Did Trump invade Iran because he thought it would lead to a different outcome because Trump views the population of Iran to be quote 'high IQ people'? (as Trump even said so as much in the last 24 hours.) "BUT … Mr. Trump, what if Iran isn't populated by high IQ people, what if Mr. Trump you were misled by fake news that Mr. Molyneux negligently tweeted rather than read the actual source material. (Lynn, 'The Wealth of Nations' (2002) IQ of Iran = 84). Well, Mr. Trump if you believed the average IQ of the population of Iran was 104 then you Mr. Trump might have assumed that all you had to do was take out the authoritarian government and then the high IQ population will swiftly bring about peace and democracy. But Mr. Trump, what if the average IQ of Iran is not 104? What if the top IQ scientists such as Lynn were right and the average IQ of Iran is in fact 84? Well then Mr. Trump, then your dealing with a very low IQ population, who will be frankly impossible to deal with, they will inevitably vote for another dictator and you Mr. Trump will find yourself in another forever war. That is why national IQ matters and that is why putting out false unverified and unsubstantiated tweets about IQ is a great error of judgment. Lastly to conclude, I believe in the great predictive power of IQ like you Stef, which is why I think it would be incumbent upon you to put out a correction unless you have verified sources from other top IQ researchers that support your OUTRAGEOUS Iran 104 National IQ claim." "Hi Stef! when communicating philosophy or philosophical ideas to the average person, and they respond with confusion or indifference, how do we know whether we have failed to adequately relay the ideas or if it is just too complex a language for them to grasp? I know everyone is capable of understanding philosophy on some level even if they’re lower IQ, so could the disconnect come from the disparity of time spent in the subject?" "Your Sunday (3/15) show was incredible. As a Catholic, that opening monologue challenging today's Christians to answer with clarity what Jesus commands via the Good Samaritan parable, especially when it comes to the specific child abuse scenario you laid out, it left me with a deep sense of sorrow for what you endured, and my own sense of frustration with the leadership of the Church. "The reality that not one, no church leaders, Anglican or not, lay or religious influencers; no one has tried to dialogue with you to address these essential issues, when you have been pointing them out for decades is more than disappointing to hear. "(Not as disappointing as some of the immediate live caller responses yesterday... the second woman was out of line, and the gentleman who landed on the idea that if you had not been abused, we wouldn't have received your philosophy gifts was hard to stomach.) "Nonetheless, if one (myself) was going to try to reach out, share your 3/15 show and try to coordinate a dialogue just to deal with the Good Samaritan and cold abuse topic, is that something you would be comfortable with? "second question "a few days ago, someone asked about how you feel about the Shroud of Turin, maybe you missed it but there has been renewed interest in the Shroud the last few years when a new photo 'negative' that appeared in 2024 along with new studies that for many was very compelling ... from a reason and evidence standpoint... to the image being impossible to reproduce. "I could be wrong but I felt like your answer lumped it so quickly with other things ... I believe u mentioned people of faith like Aquinas have searched for 'proof' for centuries. And you found that people of faith who are seeking proof to be an interesting paradox. "are you able to revisit this topic and assess what authenticating (if we are to believe the new reporting) that specific historical artifact could mean for at least establishing how the image came to be on the cloth? "again appreciate all u do to improve the world via philosophy and advocating for objective morality." "America in WW2 has burned down some and bombed all the major cities in Japan, even using the atomic bomb to create a glimpse of hell never before seen on earth. Yet today, the alliance between US and Japan couldnt be friendlier. In the middle east, we’ve also bombed them to next week and back for 30 or so years. And they still, understandably, hate the US. What do you think causes this difference in point of view between the countries? Is it religion/culture? Could it be IQ? Forgive me if this is too politcal or naive a question. Thank you!" "My martial arts club have a Hazing ritual that I believe is immoral and useless. I trying to get it banned. "Whats your opinions on hazing? Is it for example always immoral?" 0:00:00 The IQ Controversy 0:12:15 Discussing Iranian IQ Studies 0:29:34 Philosophy and Resistance to Truth 0:34:59 Philosophers and Child Abuse 0:38:16 The Shroud of Turin and Faith 0:45:21 Moral Dilemmas and Divine Intervention 0:48:37 Bumper Stickers and Performative Virtue 0:51:10 Closing Thoughts and Support GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

11,040 次观看 • 3 个月前

Steve Nash advice to undersized guards 🔥 When you’re undersized, skill isn’t optional, it’s the equalizer. You can’t rely on height or raw athleticism to level the playing field. You have to become elite at your craft: knockdown shooting, advanced ball control, and a high basketball IQ that keeps defenders guessing. Unpredictability is your advantage. Change pace. Read help early. See the floor one step ahead. And for small guards, throwing strikes matters. Deliver passes directly into the shooter’s pocket, it raises shooting percentages, builds trust, and turns simple reads into easy assists. If you’re a guard looking to seriously upgrade your skill set, my 30-Day Ball Handling Program is 50% off right now. 🔗

Steve Nash advice to undersized guards 🔥 When you’re undersized, skill isn’t optional, it’s the equalizer. You can’t rely on height or raw athleticism to level the playing field. You have to become elite at your craft: knockdown shooting, advanced ball control, and a high basketball IQ that keeps defenders guessing. Unpredictability is your advantage. Change pace. Read help early. See the floor one step ahead. And for small guards, throwing strikes matters. Deliver passes directly into the shooter’s pocket, it raises shooting percentages, builds trust, and turns simple reads into easy assists. If you’re a guard looking to seriously upgrade your skill set, my 30-Day Ball Handling Program is 50% off right now. 🔗

GymRat Basketball | Trey Winkler

46,437 次观看 • 6 个月前

Metal Gear Solid Delta is poorly optimised on all platforms and it's disingenuous to use it as indicative of typical PS5 Pro advantages. Even in its infancy PS5 Pro's often delivering on Cerny's target of it achieving PS5 30fps mode like fidelity, only at 60fps. Numerous tentpole games this year show sizeable improvements. Battlefield 6 Beta - "Substantially" better IQ and up to 55% better fps than PS5 in performance mode. Assassin's Creed Shadows - Generationally tansformative RTGI/fidelity mode settings, but at 60fps. Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 - Fidelity and graphics settings of PS5's 30fps mode, but at 60fps. Death Stranding 2 - Near locked 60fps with similar IQ and fidelity as PS5's 30fps mode. Monster Hunter Wilds - Far superior image stability and more consistent 60fps vs PS5. As someone who bought a PS5 Pro at launch, I can absolutely say it's been worth it for me, and I'd struggle to go back to the base system. There will always be outliers like MGS Delta, but they don't represent typical improvements PS5 Pro generally brings. Much like PC releases with issues like shader compilation or traversal stutter, or more general bugginess vs console counterparts, it would be unfair to use those things as indicative of PC gaming performance improvements in totality, or to conclude all PC gaming hardware is a scam lol. Context matters. Video compilation. #PS5Pro #PS5 #DigitalFoundry

Metal Gear Solid Delta is poorly optimised on all platforms and it's disingenuous to use it as indicative of typical PS5 Pro advantages. Even in its infancy PS5 Pro's often delivering on Cerny's target of it achieving PS5 30fps mode like fidelity, only at 60fps. Numerous tentpole games this year show sizeable improvements. Battlefield 6 Beta - "Substantially" better IQ and up to 55% better fps than PS5 in performance mode. Assassin's Creed Shadows - Generationally tansformative RTGI/fidelity mode settings, but at 60fps. Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 - Fidelity and graphics settings of PS5's 30fps mode, but at 60fps. Death Stranding 2 - Near locked 60fps with similar IQ and fidelity as PS5's 30fps mode. Monster Hunter Wilds - Far superior image stability and more consistent 60fps vs PS5. As someone who bought a PS5 Pro at launch, I can absolutely say it's been worth it for me, and I'd struggle to go back to the base system. There will always be outliers like MGS Delta, but they don't represent typical improvements PS5 Pro generally brings. Much like PC releases with issues like shader compilation or traversal stutter, or more general bugginess vs console counterparts, it would be unfair to use those things as indicative of PC gaming performance improvements in totality, or to conclude all PC gaming hardware is a scam lol. Context matters. Video compilation. #PS5Pro #PS5 #DigitalFoundry

NIB

77,144 次观看 • 10 个月前

IQ as a measure simply doesn't work for women the way it does for men (totally serious point that Lukas (computer) 🔺 is making partly as a joke) IQ is a direct measure of "how good is this this person's brain at solving logical puzzles" Turns out that this is a great proxy measure for a lot of things because the world provides all kinds of logical puzzles to solve; this is not a great proxy measure for women across a bunch of areas since women have an entirely different set of solutions open to them Classic example of this here 👉 "Why *think* about this and maybe get it wrong when 'make a lot of noise and let a man figure it out' is an option?" This is the same reason why it's difficult to compare the intelligence of wolves and dogs by seeing how well they do when presented with a problem - wolves will attempt to solve the problem to the best of their ability, dogs will attempt to figure out what the nearest person wants the dog to do Especially in matters involving sex (and almost everything with women in our society involves sex) women are adapted to an environment where the outcome of their actions isn't about what would logically happen but about what people would decide for her when she acted that way

IQ as a measure simply doesn't work for women the way it does for men (totally serious point that Lukas (computer) 🔺 is making partly as a joke) IQ is a direct measure of "how good is this this person's brain at solving logical puzzles" Turns out that this is a great proxy measure for a lot of things because the world provides all kinds of logical puzzles to solve; this is not a great proxy measure for women across a bunch of areas since women have an entirely different set of solutions open to them Classic example of this here 👉 "Why think about this and maybe get it wrong when 'make a lot of noise and let a man figure it out' is an option?" This is the same reason why it's difficult to compare the intelligence of wolves and dogs by seeing how well they do when presented with a problem - wolves will attempt to solve the problem to the best of their ability, dogs will attempt to figure out what the nearest person wants the dog to do Especially in matters involving sex (and almost everything with women in our society involves sex) women are adapted to an environment where the outcome of their actions isn't about what would logically happen but about what people would decide for her when she acted that way

Covfefe Anon

57,078 次观看 • 1 年前

Jordan Peterson hit hard: “People with extreme high IQs are so much more productive than people on the lower end… they’re not even in the same universe.” But here’s the part that matters most: IQ has nothing to do with morality. Being smarter doesn’t make you better. In fact, Peterson warns there’s a real “Luciferian temptation” that comes with high intelligence — the arrogant belief that your superior mind gives you the right to impose your systems and values on everyone else. We all have the same intrinsic human value. In a world that worships intelligence and status, remembering that smarts and goodness are completely separate traits is crucial. I’ve seen brilliant people do ugly things and “average” people show incredible moral strength. What do you think — does high intelligence actually make someone more prone to arrogance and moral blind spots, or is that just a stereotype?

Jordan Peterson hit hard: “People with extreme high IQs are so much more productive than people on the lower end… they’re not even in the same universe.” But here’s the part that matters most: IQ has nothing to do with morality. Being smarter doesn’t make you better. In fact, Peterson warns there’s a real “Luciferian temptation” that comes with high intelligence — the arrogant belief that your superior mind gives you the right to impose your systems and values on everyone else. We all have the same intrinsic human value. In a world that worships intelligence and status, remembering that smarts and goodness are completely separate traits is crucial. I’ve seen brilliant people do ugly things and “average” people show incredible moral strength. What do you think — does high intelligence actually make someone more prone to arrogance and moral blind spots, or is that just a stereotype?

Camus

444,069 次观看 • 2 个月前